On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 08:38:22 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
A good histogram tutorial for those listers new to digital imaging:
http://www.bayphoto.com/Instructions/Histogram.htm
Rob,
Thanks for the link, I need to explain this to people sometimes.
Did you notice the left handed SLR in the
At 05:02 PM 1/2/2004, Tanya wrote:
WHAT a fantastic way to wake up in the morning, I came to my 'puter and
literally laughed my way through breakfast. You guys are so hilarious, and
have just increased my motivation to get to GFM about 10-fold...
This one of the reasons I hang around this list.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Firstly, let me say that this has got to go down as the best response ever
to a thread on PDML. Thank you SO much Chris for your detail and thought
that has gone into this, it must have taken you for EVER. Every point has
been noted and is
Fantastic!!! Thanks a lot!!! I think I'll give it a try with TTL cameras
first.
Cheers Guys!!!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extension tube K
Andy, the basic formula for
under average circumstances, you should not be able to tell any difference
at all. a very slight difference in color would have been the most i would
have expected, and i suspect that a minor variation in the camera's auto
white balance to be the main cause of that. the differences should be more
Thank you Ian,
Your advice is most welcomed and hopefully I can make good use to those
extension tubes. It is more of an experiment than a sort of have-to-use
basis since I have purchased a 100/2.8 macro to do most of my macro
work. And it has served me exceptionally well. I'm fairly new to macro
Tanya, same thing as what Arnie says, but even more. you have to figure your
break even rate, what you need to run your business and stay open. cost of
materials is a small portion of that total and that is entirely billed to
your clients. you have obvious business expenses like equipment,
Hi Sven,
on 04 Jan 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
I still wonder, why they don't make those finders a bit larger. Would
this really require a very large prism - or do the manufacturers just
find it unimportant? How wonderfull if the *ist D had a ME-Super-sized
finder image...
Yes, but the ME
Hi,
Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:36:15 AM, you wrote:
Me too - just on the list the other day, I noticed that I had used the words
their, they're and there in *their* wrong contexts! I was almost
going to post an apology for it too, but decided to swallow my pride for
once and just accept
someone please refresh my memory of the url for the pug please?
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
scanning color Kodak 100 gold negs - arrrggh!
Are you using the official Epson plastic negative holder?
I have a Perfection 1660 and haven't had any problems scanning colour
negatives of any description, although Fuji tend to come out slightly
better than Kodak.
S
At 02:57 AM 1/4/2004, JCOwrote:
someone please refresh my memory of the url for the pug please?
It's at http://pug.komkon.org/
Pat in SF
Good call. . . If you've ever been where a gaggle of geese figured you
as a terratorial interloper, and tried to crowd you off their space, the
analogy works. g
keith whaley
Ryan Lee wrote:
Had the cricket on as background noise and I heard something I haven't heard
in a while: gaggle of
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] burst forward and
uttered:
Spot-on again Tom. I didn't read the question properly - my apologies.
Perhaps if I had phrased it better, my apologies for that.
Kind regards
Kevin
Nor did I,sorry. But the portable light
I don't know about the Canons but neither a Nikon F100 nor F5 would be an
alternative - they both have a .7 finder magnification.
Does anybody know how cameras with digital viewfinders (like the Minolta A1)
compare to this?
Sven
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Heiko Hamann
I've had violent ducks believe my fingers held bread when it long ran out. I
think I get the picture :-) But hmm.. I forgot what it is for ducks- it's
not flock is it.. sheesh. Oh and a long time ago in Trafalgar Square when
they were still selling birdseed for 25p, a friend of mine discovered he
Hello!
I am new to this list and new to photography. I have a feeling this is
not the list for me - from the messages I've been reading you all seem
very experienced. Maybe I need to find a list for beginners?
Thanks so much,
jasmine
Hi
Re the stars photo - I would love to be able to recreate photo's where the
shutter stays open for a period of time with the starts creating almost a
circle effect.
Thanks a lot
Naomi
I dabble in this once in while in the spring and or fall in
Ryan Lee wrote:
Had the cricket on as background noise and I heard something I haven't
heard
in a while: gaggle of photographers. Gotta prefer it to mob or hoarde or
swarm..
that isn't very alliterative though. How about phalanx of photogs or flock
of photographers?
Tom Reese
Hi Sven,
on 04 Jan 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
I don't know about the Canons but neither a Nikon F100 nor F5 would be an
alternative - they both have a .7 finder magnification.
I didn't care of the magnfication but of the viewfinder size: the
viewfinders of the F100 and F5 are quite big and
Nup! I still like gaggle. If one's a stickler for that little bit of
cadence, how bout a photogaggle of photographers? But then again, just
'photogaggle' would suffice wouldn't it? I think phalanx sounds too
anatomical and flock sounds too Heidi.. Hmm.. a farm of photographers.
No no! Gaggle!
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Scanning BW negs -- no problem
Scanning flatbed prints and objects - no problem
scanning slides - no problem
but, but, but..
scanning color Kodak 100 gold negs - arrrggh!
Going to
Hello everyone,
I`ve tried posting about myself last friday when I saw a couple of you do so
and it has occured to me that it would be nice that I make a little
introduction about myself. However for some strange reason it didn`t go
through and so here I go agian.
My name is William Robert
At 07:32 AM 4/01/2004 +, you wrote:
Re the stars photo - I would love to be able to recreate photo's where the
shutter stays open for a period of time with the starts creating almost a
circle effect.
1. you need a tripod (or other sturdy, stable
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 11:43:28AM -0800, Jasmine wrote:
One thing I would like to get is a flash-thingy. Are they hard to
find? Expensive? (and yes, I said flash-THINGY - I have a fine command
of the English language, thank you very much!)
You already received a lot of good advice.
I
Here is a link to my homemade light table. I did not make it a friend of mine
did , but it might be good for some ideas...
Vic
P.S. You have to scroll down to the bottom to see it...
http://hometown.aol.ca/pentxuser/200lens.html
Now that I have the *ist D and installed the try-out version of BB, it
shows the images from Pentax RAW format rather blue. It might improve
with the next version. I'll keep an eye on it.
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 09:32, Bruce Dayton wrote:
My first look at it seems that it only supports viewing
But he did take a lesson from Dan Quayle. No e on potato.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: PUG January is open
If you are eating stakes graywolf, you'd wanna watch out
That would be a homonym.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:17 AM
Subject: RE: PUG January is open
Steak and stake ain't a typo or a mispelling now is it?
Theres a term for words that sound the
I fear a long thread is about to begin but I have to say it again for Tanya's
sake. I use both systems. I use Macs, my daughter uses a PC IBM clone. The PC
works. There are some advantages to owning a PC over a Mac but for people who
are not computer literate, who want a machine that works
Hi, Robert,
I've been on the list for several years (feels like an eternity, with all
the abuse I put up with here). Either you left just before I came around,
or I forget you. Likely the latter.
Either way, welcome back!
cheers,
frank, Toronto, Canada
The optimist thinks this is the best
Hi, William,
I'm a Canadian living in Canada (Toronto). What part(s) of Canada are you
from?
I'm pretty much a Pentax guy (Spotmatics, MX, LX) with an old Yashica Mat
(just for fun), and a Leica CL/40mm Summicron C (that's all the Leica I can
afford, but I love it dearly).
Sounds like
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 02:58, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don't complain. I'm living in a country full of... Americans!
My sympathy Mark.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holy crap, Herb,
That makes all the difference in the world! It's not that the yellows are
brighter or more vibrant, but that I can see many more yellow tones in the
animal. It's kind of like more contrasty, but not really. Just much more
yellow information in there, if you know what I
Tanya,
A few thoughts after 58 spins around the sun on this rock...
I've seen Moms do rotten things to daughters, often out of jealousy.
You can't change who your relatives are, so you'll have to live with it.
Just remember that you've got what she hasn't, and really wants.
Keep working and
You would now *have* infinity focus because the lens would be seated
properly.
Going the other way is no problem, i.e. putting a SMC Tak on a Fujica body -
at least it works for me, except that the Fujicas feel like garbage compared
to a Spottie or Rolleiflex body.
--
Robert
- Original
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: OT: why trailing-curtain-sync is useful
And here I thought the flash circuit was simple and mostly
mechanical... Though I'll agree that
Homonyms?
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PUG January is open
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 02:17:06 -0500
Hi!
One of the *most* interesting threads here on PDML while I've been a
member. I am sorry that I am joining a little late.
Yeah, I suppose so. I just feel guilty being paid to have fun, but I guess
movie stars do it all the time and they earn alot more than i could ever
conceive of! lol
What ~exactly~ are you driving at, Pieter? vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Pieter Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Flash is a tool, mostly used as a weapon that makes one look more flashy
and
But, seriously,
I agree with you, Pieter. Despite my earlier advice to Jasmine about
flashes, when I got back into photography several years ago, after my
hiatus, I didn't use a flash for about 2 years. Not out of choice, just
because I didn't have one. It did force me to learn to use
when i look at the image on the web site using Internet Explorer 6 and
compare to the source image in Photoshop CS, the source is more saturated
and there isn't a greenish tinge to the image. the entire anemone should be
shades of orange and no other color. the only difference between what is on
Hi, Tanya,
I'm not a pro. I don't know anything about being a pro. So take what I'm
about to say with a grain of salt. Besides, Chris seems to be doing a fine
job of providing advice, much better than I could.
But what you said below scares me. Is it not normal practice to get the
money
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 11:03 PM
Subject: OT: Polarizer pictures, which is better, and why?
. I want
some honest opinion here. Anyone?
It looks like the B+W is the stronger polarizer, but judging
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer
Subject: AW: *ist D finder magnification
Nice work - and makes the *ist D look a little better when compared to its
competitors rather than to film cameras (and this looks like a major
disadvantage of the Olympus E1 system, too).
I still
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: New to list
See? Again, I'm making nice to the newbies, and I get slagged for it!
I'm taking my toys and going home. I don't think I want to play with you
guys anymore.
Ahh Frank, I forgot the smileys again.
William Robb
Tanya, isn't there an Australian professional photographers association? you
should be using them as a resource too. random Google gives me Accredited
Professional Photographers Australia as an organization. then there is
http://www.acmp.com.au/ who should know who the wedding photographers
No, es is added. As it is in most words that end with O.
--
Steve Larson wrote:
But the e is added when pluralized.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 8:51 AM
Subject: Re:
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Scanning BW negs -- no problem
Scanning flatbed prints and objects - no problem
scanning slides - no problem
but, but, but..
scanning color Kodak
Tom Reese wrote:
Ryan Lee wrote:
Had the cricket on as background noise and I heard something I haven't
heard
in a while: gaggle of photographers. Gotta prefer it to mob or hoarde or
swarm..
that isn't very alliterative though. How about phalanx of photogs or flock
of photographers?
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Ann,
I have the Epson Perfection 1650. It seriously sucks for neg scans and I
loathe the day that I bought the thing. For print scanning it is great, but
I shouldn't have been such a tight-wad and spent the extra 500 or so bucks
to get a neg scanner.
I
The funny thing is that I suspect the reasoning surrounding dropping
the
aperture ring control may have partly been a function of the move to
make this
body as small as possible. Anyone who actually owns a *ist will well
know that
you have to set the lens in the A position before it's mounted,
A recent Time Magazine (The Person of the Year Issue) has a full story on
the incident.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: News about Nachtwey and Weisskopf
Thanks for posting that ... very much ON topic as far as I'm
Steve Jolly wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
scanning color Kodak 100 gold negs - arrrggh!
Are you using the official Epson plastic negative holder?
I have a Perfection 1660 and haven't had any problems scanning colour
negatives of any description, although Fuji tend to come out slightly
Well after seeing Nick and Steve both present themselves, and given that its
new
Year, I'd better do the same.
Hello everyone, I'm Ian. Currently expatriated to San Francisco working for
HP, I was born in
Rotherham S. Yorkshire, and lived in Lyon, France from 1984-2000.
Which makes me a heinz
Ryan Lee wrote:
(snip snip)
PS. I'm sure there are a couple of others in it too.. just wait til sometime
in February- someone's going to post a yeah it was a total surprise, I
didn't think I'd win.. didn't you know I entered it too, Ann?
Hey, IF they say that in February it would
indicate
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
The holders just hold the neg in place, I can't
image it would affect color
They also hold the negs away from the all-important first centimetre of
the glass, which the scanner uses to calibrate itself when in
transparency mode. Put *anything* in this region and it's
Hi!
ft Cory,
ft The photo you called 10 zig is as good a football shot as one will ever see!
ft It's terrific! That's as good as anything you'll ever see on the cover of
ft Sports Illustrated; it's that good!
ft You mentioned the lens. Was it taken with the *ist D? Whatever it was
ft
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
gotcha :)
indeed 8-)
It was because I had been using Vuescan for a while, when it went all
funny on me. I switched back to the original scanner software and, I
think because I had been having so much trouble with colours for a few
days, I completely missed that it
Steve wrote to Thrainn:
Denim might not be too great an idea - cotton soaks up water like a
sponge, and water resistant sprays wear off quite quickly in my
experience. A better plan might be to start with water-proof material -
cut up a cheap plastic raincoat or something?
Thrainn,
Denim is
The wife and I went to GFM yesterday for lunch. I went on up to the top and
took these shots with the *ist D. There are 8 images stitched together
using PT Assembler in the final. It looks pretty good printed on Epson 8
inch wide roll paper and 34 inches long:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine is 3600 dpi
Thankyouverymuch :-P
Your welcome.
I think I'll settle for 365 dpy...
Jostein
:-)
1. For those who have me listed in their address book,
please note that my primary email address is changed; I will
be receiving mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Also note the new address for the old Lens Info site:
http://stans-photography.info
This will also be the address of the new site when
It's 366 dpy for 2004 :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: New Year's Resolution
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine is 3600 dpi
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've had violent ducks believe my fingers held bread when it long ran out.
I
think I get the picture :-) But hmm.. I forgot what it is for ducks- it's
not flock is it..
Quackpack?
Jostein
On Jan 4, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Needs to be more photo-oriented - hmmm a pose of
photographers?
How about a bunch of poor people? vbg
Speaking of language and typos, I wrote a message about panning last
night while I was falling asleep. I kept nodding off after every few
Hello Ian,
Welcome aboard. Nice to have another NorCal body on the PDML. Stayed
tuned for another PDML get together for our area.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, January 4, 2004, 10:00:30 AM, you wrote:
Ib Well after seeing Nick and Steve both present themselves, and given that its
Ib new
Beautiful view, nice shot. Makes me want to go there. Who knows what
the spring will bring?
Paul
On Jan 4, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
The wife and I went to GFM yesterday for lunch. I went on up to the
top and
took these shots with the *ist D. There are 8 images stitched together
Glad you liked it, Frank.
Thanks for the kind words.
And a huge thanks for taking time to comment all the pictures so well.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Party Time! by Jostein Oskne:
Here's another shot where bird's faces seem to take
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 14:39:56 -0500, Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks to Doug (?) who suggested pair.com as a possible web
hosting site. So far they are very good to work with, very
responsive to questions. For a little bit lower cost per
month I have vastly increased my storage and my allowable
Ann,
I have the 1640 too.
While I haven't scanned the Gold 100 film, I have used it a lot with Portra
400 VC which scans quite nicely.
One problem I have run into sometimes is that adjustments from previous
scans sticks. So I have to reset the box by clicking either the Reset or
Auto button to
Ok quick!
Tell me the name of 1 native windows program that automatically
imports and catalogs your pictures from a digital media source. It
allows you to catalog the pictures in your own virtual folders (not
actual folders), using an XML file. This way a picture can be in 3
folders, and
Oh, bugger.
I'll be late as usual, then.
Hope I catch the plane to GFM..
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 8:41 PM
Man oh man! I just quickly looked at the main page of PUG, and I've barely
made a dent in this month's offerings! Big gallery! Better get cracking:
Cormorants, Lake Awassa Ethiopia, 1988 by Bob Walkden:
Cropped and composed just about perfectly, this shot would be wonderful if
it were only
Frank,
Your comments are much appreciated. I watched him for about an hour, will
post the rest of the series when I get the time.
Many thanks,
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 January 2004 16:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: January
Hello all,
I've been away from this list for a extended period of time. I have just
recently started to read it again. I have a question. Does a website exist
that lists comments from PDML members on different Pentax mount lenses. I
recall of one such site a long time ago, but have lost track.
I
Steve Jolly wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
The holders just hold the neg in place, I can't
image it would affect color
They also hold the negs away from the all-important first centimetre of
the glass, which the scanner uses to calibrate itself when in
transparency mode. Put *anything*
Ian, he IS right. Buy, read, study Shaw's Closeups in
Nature. Go try some macro shots. Then go back and read Shaw
again. He is an extremly good writer, one who is effective
at getting his ideas across.
Stan
Ian bromehead wrote:
Andy
I am just as gullible as you, ...
The guy I bought them from
I haven't shot racecars for a long time, but I got my practice as a teenager
at Mosport.
One thing I did learn and remember is that both Doug and Paul are right:
it's all in the followthrough! Keep following the subject well after you
snap (sorry, s-q-u-e-e-z-e) the shutter release. Makes
Steve Jolly wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
The holders just hold the neg in place, I can't
image it would affect color
They also hold the negs away from the all-important first centimetre of
the glass, which the scanner uses to calibrate itself when in
transparency mode. Put *anything*
On 4/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Me too - just on the list the other day, I noticed that I had used the
words
their, they're and there in *their* wrong contexts! I was almost
going to post an apology for it too, but decided to swallow my pride for
once and just accept that I am
On 4/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
So, they are geese? How about a pantheon of photographers (are they
gods)? No, I
got it a murder (crows) of paparazzi. GRIN
Where I work, it's a focus of cameramen, a whinge of reporters, an
assembly of editors, and the collective noun for soundmen is not
On 4/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
My name is William Robert and I`m from Canada now living in Hong Kong. I`m
into photojournalism and documentary photography. Presently I`m working on
a book about life here in Hong Kong and I have a long ways to go before I
finish. I`m not a
On 3/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] burst forward and uttered:
Spot-on again Tom. I didn't read the question properly - my apologies.
Perhaps if I had phrased it better, my apologies for that.
Kind regards
Kevin
Hey - I'm the Brit here - I can apologise better
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:56:09PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Taken by a robot on Mars!
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-04-2004/images-1-4-04.html
Its mission is to find life, right?
They should have send Lewis the robot photographer we discussed a while
ago. That robot was
Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The negatives look pretty normal to me (errors in
technique notwithstanding ;-) ), but the prints look extremely
odd.
I've tried to point out the weirdness in the captions.
Overall, the
dark areas have come out looking almost solarised - areas that
are
Bruce et al.,
Mea culpa, maybe I was spouting a bit there. My posting had been
made just after seeing that Tanya was looking for a laptop (for one
reason) to use to project pictures while at the wedding reception
coupled with the posting I copied that said pc's and macs could do
exactly
Nothing wrong with that graywolf - I lrv(ed) Buffy.
Actually, was just looking at the series on DVD on Ebay...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: PUG January is open
Watching too
graywolf said:
So, they are geese? How about a pantheon of photographers (are they gods)?
No, I
got it a murder (crows) of paparazzi. GRIN
DEFINITELY a pantheon of photographers, but only if it allows for godESSES
too! lol
tan.
On 4 Jan 2004 at 12:34, Steve Desjardins wrote:
This explains a lot. I had no idea what you meant when I first read
this because I have never had any problem pressing the A-lock button on
the end. I also have no trouble removing my CF card, although I can
easily see how someone might. My
On 4 Jan 2004 at 12:27, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Get a life you guys - go take some pictures - Tanya already said that
Mac's are non-existent where she is. The PC people have been far more
restrained this time around.
We know it's as futile as trying to justifiably criticize the *ist D :-)
Rob
Thank you, Frank - I'm flattered!!
Being the photographer, I can nit-pick the shot with such things as I wish
the falling snow were more obvious, that I were a few steps to the left,
etc. I was deliberately looking to demonstrate the winter coat of these
animals, and how that changes their
Because the module just set the camera to synch speed when the flash
recycled.
Billy Gates and confusers are smarter than *you*! :)
--
Robert
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 4:25 AM
I don't know about 1/30th for racecars ...
It's impressive as all get-out if you can manage it.
I've never got quite that slow, but I have shot several at 1/60,
and even one reasonable shot at 1/45. One of the regulars from
a few years ago used to consistently do shots at 1/20 or slower.
A
Thanks for your thoughts Frank! About blown out whites and underexposed
shadows, other than available lighting conditions, I'm guessing the 2 stop
overexposure and the cross-processing added to it as well. About sharp
enough, I'm pretty happy with it, but I might have lost some shooting at
2.8. I
lol Piet!
Do it again!
Haha it tickles!
Again again!
- Original Message -
From: Pieter Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks for the Welcome!
Can you do that beam thingy again,
mate?
Packers won in OT! Right now, I'm a cheesehead (only North Americans will
know what that means, but I doubt many will disagree in any event g).
Time to do a few others, until I make supper (it's my turn to make it
tonight)
Fluffy by Fred Widall:
First off, a great job on cropping. I love
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Anyways, my question is: is this normal, or should I be
asking for reprints? :-)
I guess you should.
My thanks to you and William for the advice; I've sent the lab a snotty
email and I shall expect a grovelling reply from them tomorrow. ;-)
S
frank theriault:
Maybe a few of the pros on this list can enlighten me. For a commercial
job like Tanya's doing, what's the industry norm? Payment or part payment
up front? Or complete the work and then invoice? And wait. And hope
you get paid.
Here in Sweden, the norm for basically all
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-04-2004/captions/image-6.html
I see lots of tyre tracks and a big yellow arrow - proof of an ancient
Martian one-way system, perhaps? It's definitely ancient - just look at
those pot-holes...
S
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Dogs in space! Over here we're
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
