frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
Great shot Frank!
To sharp to be really Theriaultean but great none the less ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Red? RED?!?
How the hell am I going to do that in black and white?
One word Frank: Infra
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be adapted. Thanks!
Zoom !
f:4/28-70
f:2.8/28/70
xx/35-70
...
others ?
AE probably translates to metered. I used to make the same
mistake when talking about my 6x7.
It's still a very good deal and an amazing camera.
Welcome to the Brotherhood.
Chris
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:49:21 -0700, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah crap! I just KNEW there was a
On 17/10/04, Michel Carrère-Gée, discombobulated, unleashed:
Zoom !
f:4/28-70
f:2.8/28/70
xx/35-70
...
others ?
Mais non mon ami, M. Belinkoff n'aime pas les zooms - il aime seulement
des objectifs principal! Il est comme dire: 'Avez-vous un verre d'Asti
Spumante', au lieu du champagne!!!
:-)
On 16/10/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does distance count?
On Oct 16, 2004, at 9:37 AM, Cotty wrote:
He's certainly getting around - I wonder if he qualifies as the most
travelled PDMLer (to meet other PDMLers) ?
I'm sorry Dave, you slipped my mind. NZ *is* further than
On 16/10/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've done the unthinkable here: I digitally removed a couple of big
blades of grass from the bottom of the picture. I did my best to avoid
them at exposure-time but I could only raise the camera by so much :)
On 16/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html
This is still a bit of a work in progress - there are a few things yet to
do with some details, but I thought I'd present it anyway. Be happy for
comments and criticism.
Works for me.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3845290789;
rd=1
I never saw a SMC Pentax 4.0/45-125mm lens before.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3845290789;
rd=1
I never saw a SMC Pentax 4.0/45-125mm lens before.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be adapted. Thanks!
how about converting a Leica Macro-Elmarit 60/2.8? g
--
Cheers,
Bob
Amazing image.
Their business idea seems to be unique as well but I see no customers lining
up.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
Would lacking in sharpness be more correct?
You have no problem with the image sharpness of course, that I know but this
image does.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
The 2.5/75 mm Color-Heliar is an excellent lens - I have one in 39 mm screw
mount - but it is not between 60 - 65 mm.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I'd suggest, for manual focus lenses, perhaps the A 70-210/4, if
that's long enough
I've used the FA 80-320 F4.5/5.6 results were very good easily comparable
with my 70-20 f4, however a little slower aperture wise. Makes a nice
conbination with the FA 28-105 for a two lens kit.
John
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today I had the pleasure of a brief encounter with Jostein. He was
attending
a coference on the Oslo-Copenhagen ferry, and
had some time off during the daytime. We saw an exibition about
portraits at
Gallery Asbak, and visited
On 17/10/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
I almost missed meeting up with Jens. Something I ate on the boat
wreaked havoc with my digestive system, and kept me running for the
loo every 15 minutes or so all night. Some sleep in the morning made a
change, so I chanced on leaving my cabin
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty soon that man will have had a pint with every PDMLer on
Earth.
And perhaps a few of the others, too.
Bob, I'm no match for the real globetrotters on this List. Think about
Stan Halpin or Tanya for example. Rob Studdert had a
On 17/10/04, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3845290789;
rd=1
LOL!! Someone with a sense of humour ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 17/10/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was interesting to meet with the Klingons, though. :-)
DO explain!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
If you mean Hobgoblins as in Pan Galactic Garlge Blaster, no.
I had to retire before the chaffing even started...:-(
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Jostien in Copenhagen
What do you mean?
You were there, remember? :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Jostien in Copenhagen
On 17/10/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was
Very pretty. Nicely composed. And you apparently did a good job cloning
out the grass.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2004, at 4:16 AM, David Mann wrote:
Another one from the archives.
I've done the unthinkable here: I digitally removed a couple of big
blades of grass from the bottom of the picture. I did my
Great subject. Nice range of grayscale. I would crop a little tighter,
but that's highly subjective. I might also have lowered the camera
about a couple of feet when shooting if it could have been done without
destroying the mood or drawing too much attention. But it's a very nice
shot as is.
On 17/10/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
What do you mean?
You were there, remember? :-)
Ptaak!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi Shel.
This is a good one. I like how you managed to get two riders in the frame which gives
it a
good 'racing'feel to it.
Nice contrast aswell.
It looks sharp enough on my uncalibrated monitor.
Dave
BTW you must have sneezed on your mouse. I'm home sick to.LOL
Did I miss sumthin', what's funny?
great zoom range, wish it came in A or AF.
JCO has one for sale too.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 5:17 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Rare lens?
On 17/10/04, Jens Bladt,
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/K45-125f4.html
Saw 1 or 2 not long ago on eBay, but the prices weren't high as I remember.
Not very popular for sure, don't know if they are rare.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
But they also don't show up very often, either.
Uncommon would probably be better.
Maybe even undesirable?
CRB
At 04:30 2004.10.17 -0700, you wrote:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/K45-125f4.html
Saw 1 or 2 not long ago on eBay, but the prices weren't high as I
remember. Not very
Sort of rare, but definitely unloved. I've got a mint-in-box example sitting
on the shelf that probably isn't worth putting on eBay. I guess it is just
too big compared to most of the more modern 35-135 zooms. In fact it is
bigger than just about any modern zoom except a fast (2.8) or long (300mm)
Just watched this programme where they were judging pictures for a calendar
sent in by the viewers on various nature themes. They showed a slide sent in
depicting a larvae on a twig, with a long Latin name, which looked just like
a bit of red striped toothpaste. Which is exactly what it turned out
Joe, I'm interested in both screens if you don't mind sending to Australia.
Payment by Bidpay or Paypal. Just one question though, is the box for the
SC-1 screen marked as being SC-1, or is it from some other screen. Usually
it seems that the owner buys a different screen and then pops the SC-1 in
On 17/10/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Did I miss sumthin', what's funny?
great zoom range, wish it came in A or AF.
JCO has one for sale too.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3845290789
Don't worry Don, just my sordid mind at work. The pic!
Hoya 52mm close up set. LN. +1, +2, +4. $20 shipped in US.
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
Ahh! NOW I get it!
Must be an SMCF(reudian)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 6:53 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Rare lens?
On 17/10/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Did I miss sumthin', what's
I don't use zooms ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even consider a screw
mount that can be
Thanks for the suggestion, but, with one exception, I don't use zoom lenses.
Shel
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
Does anyone know if there are any lenses that will work on the K-mount in
the 60mm - 65mm range, and what they may be? Would even
Someone mentioned a while back that it was easy to apply a polariser effect
in Photoshop.
How is this done?
TIA
Don
Here are a few more comments on photos from Octobers PUG that caught my eye. My
first set
where of the train shots, as Im partial to this mode of transportation. lol.
Again I enjoyed viewing ALL of them.
No Title
by Max McRae
Oh I forgot to mentioned, partial to horses to. Lol. Nice
Her's a few for you Wendy.
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/copper.jpg
Copper.jpg(above) is a 3 year old chocolate lab. Very friendly and a good bird dog.
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/winni.jpg
Winni.jpg(above) is a 2?
ITV 1 tonight (Sunday 7th October) 23:10 (dur: 60 mins)
The South Bank Show profiles photographer Robert Frank - whose first
major retrospective of his work is set to appear at the London Tate Modern.
http://www.southbankshow.com/coming_shows/show/65
and
Hi Mr. C.
Remember, sir, this isn't designed as a web pic. The full print, which is
about 11 x 14 or so, shows the sign more than adequately. The woman is
supposed to be somewhat separated from her surroundings, a bit lost, as it
were. In the full-sized print she has a greater presence,
Hi Paul
A tighter crop? Well, I'll fiddle with it some more, just to see if I've
missed something, although after two days this seemed about perfect to my
eye. Why don't you show me what you mean.
I took numerous shots from other angles, so drawing too much attention
wouldn't have been
Hello Fred,
I'd suggest, for manual focus lenses, perhaps the A 70-210/4, if
that's long enough, or the Tokina AT-X 100-300/4 (one of my favorite
lenses).
Thanks for recommendation. I was thinking about A 70-210/4 and I even
tried to get one on ebay, but it went too high. Is it really that
Hi Shel,
Good point about the sign angle in regard to camera position. I hadn't
thought of that. Of course you've spent much time thinking about all of
this, and I'm just thoughtlessly winging it g. Seriously, I may be
wrong about the crop as well. A tighter crop does sacrifice a bit of
the
The A 70-210/4 is a wonderful lens, sharp, nice boket.
I have it and 2 Vivitar Series 1 210/2.8-4, some say the Pentax is better.
I think they are about the same, just different in color rendering and
boket.
The AT-X 100-300/4 is an awesome lens also, I love mine.
It is large and a bit heavy but
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:16:58 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Somehow I'd have never thunk it ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of that being said, I have to say that if I had the money, I'd
love a dslr - but I
Hi Paul ...
I played with a similar crop and it just seemed too tight to me. Be
interested to see what others think. IMO, a little more space around the
principals, showing a bit more of the environment, works better.
Your suggestion of a tighter crop for the web is interesting. Is that, do
Here's a link to the Nikon version of the AT-X 100-300:
http://tinyurl.com/6nf7v
It shows what it looks like and some info.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Peter Belak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Long zoom
Listed on Boz's site:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/K45-125f4.html
Jens Bladt wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3845290789;
rd=1
I never saw a SMC Pentax 4.0/45-125mm lens before.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I think in most cases the web image should be cropped the same as the
print. The exception might be where there is interesting detail that
gets lost in a small image. Perhaps the ideal solution in regard to
your Spare some sex image would be a larger file. My web posts are
generally 13 inches
On 17/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sure wish
there were some way to show prints on the web that look a lot closer to
reality.
Ain't that the truth!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I was just reading another thread, and noticed a post from Bob, now on
G-mail, and singing it's praises.
I couldn't help noticing Bob's post, because at the top of it, inside
a big yellow banner, screamed the words:
Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be. Beware
of following
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:15:00 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
BTW, I need to have some filing done ... does marlee ever do this in an
OFFICE LOL
AFAIK, Marlee has never worked in an office. Which is why she's so
well equipped to comment through her art WRT the
On 17/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Since you and Paul both suggested a closer crop, why don't you show me what
you mean. How would you crop this pic?
Oh God. I'll try
I hate doing this to someone's work. It's all so subjective
Try this:
Hi Frank
As you may have gathered from several of my recent posts, the idea of a
DSLR is appealing to me as well, and the Pentax is a nice choice if for no
other reason than the size is about perfect and we do have a plethora of
lenses that will work with it. My biggest concern is that it
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:26:18 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
Not suggesting that you should do it, but have you thought about just
getting your film processed and having the roll scanned so you can view the
pics on the computer? Electronic proof prints, and you can
No better or worse than just suggesting it be cropped with no indication of
how anyway, I asked for it, and it's probably less invasive than you
making magazine covers of other photos ... no need for a double standard
here, Mr. C ;-)) Glad to see that you were able to overcome your
Yes Frank you should be afraid, very afraid...
frank theriault wrote:
I was just reading another thread, and noticed a post from Bob, now on
G-mail, and singing it's praises.
I couldn't help noticing Bob's post, because at the top of it, inside
a big yellow banner, screamed the words:
Warning:
On 17/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
No better or worse than just suggesting it be cropped with no indication of
how anyway, I asked for it, and it's probably less invasive than you
making magazine covers of other photos ... no need for a double standard
here, Mr. C ;-))
H thought provoking approach. Not sure I like it, not sure I
don't, but there's something to it ... see, y'did good ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try this:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
mike wilson wrote:
A chantarelle or oyster mushroom?
Maybe a bracket fungus.
mike
Well it seems many of us perceive it as gills of a fungus -
Maybe Ken will back off the macro and show us the whole cap.
Unless he is totally messing with us and it isn't a mushroom. :)
ann - now I'm really
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:42:07 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html
This is still a bit of a work in progress - there are a few things yet to
do with some details, but I thought I'd present it anyway. Be happy for
comments and
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
Here's one I'm not sure of (for obvious reasons) I won't say anything
more, but I'd be real interested to hear what y'all think.
thanks,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: OT:Polariser effect in PS CS?
Someone mentioned a while back that it was easy to apply a
polariser effect
in Photoshop.
How is this done?
Ummm, that bluff got called and instructions were not
forthcoming
William Robb
On 17/10/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Also, don't like
Cotty's tilt.
Hey, you're not the only one! VBG
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 17/10/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
Here's one I'm not sure of (for obvious reasons) I won't say anything
more, but I'd be real interested to hear what y'all think.
Took me a while to see the head but I love the
I don't know.
That female creature trying to give it her Theda Bara best is enough to
keep anyone walking!
Especially when she's got her B.F. pimping for her/them. {shudder}
keith
On the other hand, your crop is just fine, Cot! g
Cotty wrote:
On 17/10/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated,
Thanks Bill.
How about a way to darken blue skies a bit and not cool the whole pic?
I was out the other day without a PL (shame on me) and got some nice
fall colors but the sky is too pale to contrast.
Ive tried the replace color feature but the result isn't at all
natural.
Don
-Original
I think I agree with just about everything Frank said, (now the big
question does this mean I've finally lost my mind).
The one thing I don't see in the womans face is defiance, more of a look
challenge. But the surroundings still tell a lot of
the story. To tight a crop and you lose that.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:15:02 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Courier's Parking Lot
by Frank Theriault
I like this one for two reasons. One, the lines of the window and sidewalk and Two,
how
the front bike
fades into the rest. Good DOF her Frank. Framing and contrast are good.
Thanks,
you buy a plugin that simulates it. from what i remember, it's a plugin that
costs about $100 or so.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:09 AM
Subject: OT:Polariser effect in PS CS?
Someone
It shows what it looks like and some info.
Thanks for info, it looks good. But I did not find any in K mount, not
even in completed listings.
Peter B.
All your points are well-taken, Frank.
The scene has an importance all of it's own.
I'd leave it as shot. All the elements in place and appropriately
distracting.
The girl with her haunting eyes and her net stockings sticking out of
her cutoffs is just one of the little oddities.
Most excellent
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:37:32 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I agree with just about everything Frank said, (now the big
question does this mean I've finally lost my mind). snip
No, the question is: Which one of us should be ~more~ worried!
LOL
cheers,
frank
PS:
Thanks Dave. Not sure if eerie works for the picture though..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 6:15 PM
Subject: Horse shooters Oct Pug comments:part Deux
Look Ma no Hands
by Ryan Lee
Good stop action
Looking at Dave the Horsewhisperer's PUG comments reminded me that the
deadline for November PUG is arriving on Wednesday, so I thought now
would be a good time to see what the theme is, so I can get to
printing/scanning/submitting.
Red? RED?!?
How the hell am I going to do that in black and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Staten Island Ferry
by Ann Sandedele
Now that I realize the sign project, I understand a lot of these shots better now.
Nice
contrast between
the window light and the interior. I like a lot of line work, and I enjoy how the
window
and floor lines work
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:32:06 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The girl with her haunting eyes and her net stockings sticking out of
her cutoffs is just one of the little oddities.
snip
I keep coming back to this photo again and again - can't keep my eyes off it.
Good point
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PUG Deadline Approacheth
What if I submit, say, a photo of a Ferrari, and say it's red in
real
life, really it is. vbg.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/2782878_red.jpg
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: OT:Polariser effect in PS CS?
Thanks Bill.
How about a way to darken blue skies a bit and not cool the whole
pic?
I was out the other day without a PL (shame on me) and got some
nice
fall colors but the sky is too pale to contrast.
OK, took your advice and put up a much larger image ... might be a slow
download for someone with a slow connection, but there's not much I could
do about it ... so, here's large and small:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh-lg.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:24:08 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/10/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
Here's one I'm not sure of (for obvious reasons) I won't say anything
more, but I'd be real interested to hear
does it remove the reflections? you have url?
mishka
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:29:41 -0400, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you buy a plugin that simulates it. from what i remember, it's a plugin that
costs about $100 or so.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:50:45 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/2782878_red.jpg
Uh, thanks...
-frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
That auction ended, mine is still going though:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=3846338403
They are not really rare, but not common either.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 4:53 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:14:36 -0400, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should have added - Do you know what this is?
Since everyone else is guessing mushroom, and they're probably right,
I'll be perverse, and guess something different, just in case they're
wrong.
I say it's the pages of
nik Color Efex Pro 2.0 from nik multimedia contains a
Polarization Filter for Photoshop.
I've never used it so I can't comment on its abilities.
The blurb states 'The Polarization filter is among the more unique and
powerful filters in the nik Color Efex Pro 2.0 collection. The
Polarization
Today I went to listen to Sisse Brimberg and see her photgraphs in
Øksnehallen, Copenhagen - the lecture Jostein unfortunately didn't get to
attend two days ago. She showed the some of the famous shots we can all find
on the internet and then some photographs from the former USSR republic
called
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:44:05 +0100, Malcolm Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just watched this programme where they were judging pictures for a calendar
sent in by the viewers on various nature themes. They showed a slide sent in
depicting a larvae on a twig, with a long Latin name, which looked
On 17/10/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
And, just so anyone doesn't think the worst of me: I know the young
lady, she knew I was in her back yard taking photos, I wasn't
stalking, and she's seen the photo and told me she likes it...
Just wanted to clear that one up.
If you
I like this a lot. It's intriguing and well composed. Very good.
Paul
On Oct 17, 2004, at 10:19 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
Here's one I'm not sure of (for obvious reasons) I won't say anything
more, but I'd be real interested to hear what y'all
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2793927
I'm trying to improve my protrait technique and I offer up this
image for critique.
Shot with my Ricohmatic 225 on Agfa APX 100 film. Developed in Rodinal
(1:100 for 60 mins) scanned on my Epson 3170. Heavily cropped in PS7
with contrast
Go to Image/Adjustments/Hue and Saturation in PS. On the menu at top
where it says master, pull down to blue. Decrease lightniess and
increase satuation. Adjust hue if necessary.
Paul
On Oct 17, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Bill.
How about a way to darken blue skies a bit and
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2782878
I won't say anything
more, but I'd be real interested to hear what y'all think.
Caveman thinks Halloween is near.
On 17/10/04, Fred Widall, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2793927
I'm trying to improve my protrait technique and I offer up this
image for critique.
I think your traits are very pro Fed ;-)
Yeah, works fine for me - great shot.
Cheers,
Cotty
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:15:46 -0400, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Few realize that the Detroit suburbs are chock full of lakes and trees.
The image of downtown casts the entire area in unfortunate tones of
gray and black. In truth, the metropolitan area is one of the most
beautiful
Wow! What a difference a few inches make. Now I get a sense of how
crisp the image is. And for the first time I see that the girl has a
piereced nose and is wearing fishnet stockings. The fishnets seem to be
almost a nod to prostitution, but the stocking cap says she really
doesn't want to do
Thanks so much for you Komplimentary Komments Keith. I went ahead and put
up a larger, screen filling image (hope it's not too large - there's room
around it on my screen - per Paul's suggestion. Might allow a better sense
of the photo.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PUG Deadline Approacheth
What if I submit, say, a photo of a Ferrari, and say it's red in
real
life, really it is. vbg.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/2782878_red.jpg
William Robb
You beat
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
