In a message dated 8/31/2005 3:06:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By all means, go to Yosemite. It is one of the best places on earth for
a nature lover and for a photographer. As for the bears, never carry
any food, candy, gum, or cosmetics on your person or in your
Looking at the 5n viewfinder (also applies to the DS), there is a little
(minus) on the right edge of the slider and a little (plus) on the left edge of
the slider. Since I need near-sighted correction (i.e., negative diopters), I
push the slider all the way to the right when I am not wearing my
Quoting Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I heard that the *istDS has some sensitivity in the infrared. Has
anybody experiences shooting IR with *istD?
Thanks and best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die
Zx-5n manual also says that the diopter adjustment ranges from +1.5D to -2.5D.
Same for the DS.
Pat in SF
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which direction is that? If I set the 5n all the way to the right, as I
look at the camera from behind, working without glasses is just fine.
Thanks! I looked at the manual but didn't see anything about the direction
until you mentioned it. Now I see it.
Well, off to watch a movie and then to bed.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Pat Kong
Looking at the 5n viewfinder (also applies to the DS), there is a little
(minus) on the
On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:38 PM, David Mann wrote:
There is some, particularly in the components that are optimized
to to take advantage of the native hardware signal processing
capabilities integrated into the PowerPC G4/G5 and Pentium series
cpus. Hand-coded instructions in these critical
On a more serious note, the 5n finder has enough correction to
allow me to
focus without wearing my glasses. It would be great if the DS
allowed that
as well.
It's got enough for my eyes. I guess it depends on how much
correction you need, sans glasses.
Godfrey
Subjective opinions follow...
Bad(lands)Mud by Kenneth Waller - It really stands out and captures my
attention. Good Mud Ken! I had a similar shot taken near Grand Junction
Colorado that I considered, but the scene was no where as 3-D as yours is.
It POPS!
Old Rose by Dag Thrane -
That's Great! Maybe I won't have to wear my glasses when using the DS.
BTW, I can't thank you enough for the loan of the 5n.
Now I'm outta here ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Pat Kong
Zx-5n manual also says that the diopter adjustment ranges from +1.5D to
-2.5D.
Same for the
Some suggestions just throw out there:
1. What is it?
2. Purple
3. Where am I?
4. 2-toned
5. Panorama
6. Tri-color
7. Wooden
8. Night (did we have a night?)
9. Texture
10. Contrast
11. Morning
12. Painting
BW is always good. I liked the Synchronicity themes of the past as
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 11:15:51PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The difference is that the 30-50% gains with the automated tools
might mean more value for large bodies of code, where the number of
code sections that can be optimized to the maximum extent by hand
tend to be a lot
I did plan for this in advance... Just made sure the skies didn't blow
up too much, and the statues didn't clamp at the bottom of the
histogram too much either...
The conversion was a quick job done in the train as I was leaving
Budapest. I'd have to redo all of those if I were to print.
Yep, I
I heard that the *istDS has some sensitivity in the infrared. Has
anybody experiences shooting IR with *istD?
Shot this with my D, the FA-J 18-35, and a Cokin infrared filter (which is
nearly opaque in the visible spectrum).
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/d2/infra_01.html
So yeah,
Stan Halpin wrote:
No, I think I won't bid on this auction. [End of stream of consciousness]
I might well do.
Malcolm
The roof of my apartment (accessible through normal stairs) looks on
to the bay, and both bridges are visible. I can't guarantee it will be
a great view, (there are some buildings across the street) but we
could end up there if you guys want.
This map is pretty much centered on my place:
I think there might be a WPi in my future. Sometimes I'd like to have
a little camera with me, and a submergable one is a plus. The other
day I was in the baths in Budapest, and would have loved to have a
small camera with me to photograph that place...
j
On 9/1/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I liked the Synchronicity themes of the past as well.
Seconded.
More:
Reflection (not reflections)
Air
Stormy
Space
Dirt
Locomotion
Artifice
Beauty
Destruction
Eye
Rain
I appreciate greatly the work that all Pugmeisters put into this project.
I'm in the same situation but I know I review pictures quite a lot,
deleting a couple ones when I have time to get more capacity out of my
little 1GB card. So I often take up to 5 pictures in a row and delete
2-3 of'em a bit later. That uses batteries quite much.
2005/9/1, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL
These provide a higher than 3V voltage don't they?
2005/8/31, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear All,
I have been following the debate regarding batteries with interest, After
trying several I have settled on rechargeable Lithium CR-V3 which work
brilliantly. I did a lot of research
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Cotty wrote:
Hi team,
2 new Optios:
WPi:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0508/05083107pentax_optiowpi.asp
No SMC lens.
(in a very posh hotel in Berlin - been filming for a couple of days at
short notice - cock up over hotel bookings for me and reporter, so got
upgraded
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Steam of consciousness response to the lens...] Impressive lens. And
only 7300 grams! I think that a gram is about the weight of a feather,
7300 of them shouldn't be too bad. Oh, wait. That is close to 7.3
kilos. That is about the weight of my bowling
Thank you!
The reason why the edge of the wall is in the picture is that I liked the way
the old rose turns away from the world outside. The first exposures I made was
cropped as you suggest, but I think they lack some of the mood in the picture
and become a little bit too simple.
DagT
Hi Shel,
My D has enough correction for me to leave my reading glasses home --
+2 is the max I think. I think the S is the same. I have it set at
about +1.8. Prior to buying that camera I had forced myself to learn to
focus with my left eye. It's nice to be back to shooting righty.
Paul
On
Descriptive words have work well, it seems.
Some directional terms
Top, Bottom, Left, Right, etc.
Some relative position terms
Over, Above, Under, Beneath, Beside
...
Perhaps each year, the theme being something about one month?
so a January, July, or November theme?
Maybe one month a year?
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/Collingwood%202005/?action=viewcurrent=LL_9063.jpg
Hi Gang.
My original post never made it to my computer and i don't see it in the
archives, so i'll
resend.
Shot two in my mini series of
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.marketplace/browse_frm/thread/d1593
318513c0e10/827139c0116b0dd0?hl=en#827139c0116b0dd0
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Thanks, that looks very cool! The leaves on the lower right side seem
to be moving - how long was the exposure time?
Regards, Hans.
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff: Re: IR *istD experiences?
Datum: Thu, 1 Sep 2005
Awesome photo John!
Thanks for the link to Jens' IR world, very interesting and *istDS too!
Shot this with my D, the FA-J 18-35, and a Cokin infrared filter
(which is
nearly opaque in the visible spectrum).
http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/d2/infra_01.html
Did you actually look through the viewfinder of the thing, like looking
through a small cramped tunnel, made me claustrophobic...
Jerry in Houston wrote:
I have to admit to being tempted to switch to the
Olympus E-volt. I have recently seen specials of the
camera with 2 Zuiko lenses for
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 31, 2005, at 8:47 PM, Jerry in Houston wrote:
I have to admit to being tempted to switch to the
Olympus E-volt. I have recently seen specials of the
camera with 2 Zuiko lenses for about $800.
It's a good
From: Monty Python's Flying Circus
(A sign hangs in a chemist's office, Dispensing Department. John Cleese is
a chemist and is behind a chemists counter. One man is standing and a man
and lady are sitting, facing CHEMIST on the other side of the counter)
CHEMIST: Right I've got some of
Three that have occurred to me recently:
Roots
Oops
Solitaire
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some suggestions just throw out there:
1. What is it?
2. Purple
3. Where am I?
4. 2-toned
5. Panorama
6. Tri-color
7. Wooden
8. Night (did we have a night?)
9.
The eye cup on the DS is a different design that wraps entirely around
the viewfinder frame. Much more difficult to knock off accidentally.
(I've though about trying one on my D but the eye cup for the zx5n works
almost as well, more friction).
Stan Halpin wrote:
Fred, you will find, if
It doesn't say SMC but then again how often doe Pentax not publicize a
feature.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Cotty wrote:
Hi team,
2 new Optios:
WPi:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0508/05083107pentax_optiowpi.asp
No SMC lens.
(in a very posh hotel in Berlin - been
How apposite. I was thinking of posting some information about the ecology of
freshwater streams in areas of previous heavy metal extraction. But live and
let live.
8-)
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/01 Thu PM 01:28:22 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
well, don't expect it to be *so* sensitive,
you usually have to overexpose a lot (5/6 steps, but YMMV) from what
the meter says _with the filter on_ (which already *eats* all the
light)
I have no digital pentax-es, but with my DSRL (enemy-branded), in a
sunny day, the tipical exposure, at 100 Iso
I didn't try it but AFAIR (test from magazines etc.) Olympus has the
slowest AF you can find on DSLR. Pentax is almost a speed demon.
I could be wrong however...
2005/9/1, Jerry in Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have to admit to being tempted to switch to the
Olympus E-volt. I have recently seen
I recall seeing some discussions about these things, but never paid much
attention to them. So now that I've joined the Pixel Parade, it might be
helpful to know what they are and if I should be concerned about them. Are
there cold pixels as well?
Shel
Dave,
Cutsie sells. I gotta believe that the mother was pleased with this
one. Nice shot.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 4:05:52 AM, you wrote:
bcin
Ah, yes. The schoolboy's favourite:
Licence my roving hands, and let them go
Before, behind, between, above, below.
O, my America, my Newfoundland, ...
How about Point, Line, Area, Volume, Contrast, Time, Movement, Dimension,
Scale, Texture, Man and Machine, Couples, Primitive, Rococo,
Hot pixels are photosites on the sensor that are, in layman's terms, more
sensitive to the light striking them, than average pixels. Therefore they
turn 'ON' sooner and tend to be more visible during long exposures. Cold or
dead pixels are photosites that are always turned 'OFF'. There are
How about:
hot
communication
blue
container
display
tall
creature
technology
history
tragedy
pretend
reflection
sight
surface
knowledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Descriptive words have work well, it seems.
Some directional terms
Top, Bottom, Left, Right, etc.
Some relative position terms
30 second camera limit? Just go to Bulb and hold the shutter open
as long as you need.
Godfrey
On Sep 1, 2005, at 7:43 AM, danilo wrote:
well, don't expect it to be *so* sensitive,
you usually have to overexpose a lot (5/6 steps, but YMMV) from what
the meter says _with the filter on_
What Tom said. Plus...
Hot pixels become more visible as exposure times lengthen: I have a
few on my DS that surface with exposure times approaching 2 seconds.
There are three solutions to hot pixels: Noise Reduction in the
camera, hot pixel removal in the RAW converter, and cloning in
Hi, everybody!
I haven't been submitting that many pictures to PUG myself,
but I thought I'd share my idea about the themes.
Sorry if this idea is a bit stereotypical (or even extremely so):
Latin phrases. Personally I'd suggest to chose from the following:
ad hoc
et cetera
mea culpa
cogito
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi, everybody!
I haven't been submitting that many pictures to PUG myself,
but I thought I'd share my idea about the themes.
Sorry if this idea is a bit stereotypical (or even extremely so):
Latin phrases. Personally I'd suggest to chose from the following:
ad hoc
et
I find that the DS eye cup is a lot snugger that that of the 5n, which I have
lost and now place a rubberband to keep the new one in place.
Pat in SF
--- Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fred, you will find, if the DS is anything like the D, that the eyecup
will quickly choose to remove
To me it was a big misson to sell most of my analog Pentaxes to help finance
my D. I never really regretted this. Except for the MZ-S I sold it MZ-S,
but later bought annother one (from a fellow PDML'er). If you put it up for
ebay auction, it'll be gone in a week :-)
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
I lost one eyecup (eyeglasses protector? it doesn't seem much like a
cup to me ;-) from my DS ... the replacement ($30!) fits more snugly
than the original, and the second DS body's is snugger too.
A little rubberband place around the piece and the bottom edge of the
eyepiece will keep it
On Sep 1, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
To me it was a big misson to sell most of my analog Pentaxes to
help finance
my D. I never really regretted this. Except for the MZ-S I sold
it MZ-S,
but later bought annother one (from a fellow PDML'er). If you put
it up for
ebay auction,
I really should sell the MX body I picked up as I've had it for nearly six
months now and still not taken a single picture with it. But I figure I
really should take at least one roll of film with it before posting it for
sale. Nostalgia for a kind of camera that was the basis of my
Shel,
Yes, I remember that lens.
800mm/f4.0 for the 6x7...
I knew it was for the 6x7 but never caught the focal length.
It was a monster. The Front was bigger than a dinner plate.
The lens was probably a meter in length.
You would need help to mount it on a tripod.
Regards, Bob S.
On 8/31/05,
Fred,
It's nice to hear you are enjoying the DS, I think Shel will too.
I've got 1,000 jpg's out of mine since mid June. (I'll get to RAW eventually.)
Still on the original batteries and no firmware upgrades yet.
Mostly I'm using AF lenses - AF50/1.4 and F28/2.8.
Used the AF70-210/4-5.6 at the
I tend to shoot automatic at wedding receptions, occasionally outdoors in
low light conditions and often when shooting family snaps. I've never hade
that problem with any of my five LXen.
Regards,
Bob...
In a message dated 9/1/2005 8:57:55 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From my own experience, if you don't look for them you probably won't see
them.
Tom C.
===
Unless there is a hot pixel in a dark area (lighter on darker) usually you
can't see them unless you zoom
On Sep 1, 2005, at 15:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless there is a hot pixel in a dark area (lighter on darker)
usually you
can't see them unless you zoom the RAW/JPG a lot. If it has a LOT
of hot pixels,
enough to be noticeable even without zooming, then I would consider
the
sensor to
These are very fine photographs. The cloudy sky was a brilliant choise as
well.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Juan Buhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 31. august 2005 19:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: GESO: Statue
Have a great time but...
n0 50 are you crazy? ; )
Hell, it took two of us just to LOOK at it LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Sullivan
Shel,
Yes, I remember that lens.
800mm/f4.0 for the 6x7...
I knew it was for the 6x7 but never caught the focal length.
It was a monster. The Front was bigger than a dinner plate.
The lens was
The DS I ordered was scheduled for delivery tomorrow. I called FedEx
yesterday when I knew the camera was at their distribution center and asked
if it could be delivered today, or if I could pick it up. I was told it
would be delivered tomorrow and that I couldn't pick it up. This morning I
UPS is as bad. Just think how bad delivery is in New Orleans right now.
Probably all kinds of packages afloat.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: FedEx Hoovers!
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:30:50 -0700
I'm not real fond of their regular delivery either.
I've learned to wait patiently for the tracking info to
say Out for Delivery, then I know it will be there that
day, _Sometime_ between 8:00am and 8:00pm.
Fortunately they usually deliver to my home which seldom
requires a signature.
Don
With regard to this kind of thing, the folks at the desk and on the
trucks are only doing their job. They have corporate policy to adhere
to. It's when they're NOT doing their job that I get pissy. ;-)
I usually watch the tracking so I know what day the package is loaded
on the truck. If
the camera's not off. press the shutter release half-way and it should wake
from sleep mode.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: Hitachi 4GB Microdrive
Most of the time I
there are very, very few cases where that matters enough anymore to pay
someone to do it. i have lots of friends at IBM's compiler research group.
optimal code generation is a solved problem as far as the research community
is concerned. the fact that GCC isn't very good at it is the project of
Your package arrived today ;-))
Giving out misinformation doesn't seem like they're doing their job very
well. Of course, it's probably my fault that i was given the wrong
information several times.
At least buydig performed well - better than anticipated.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
it works that way on the 360FGZ.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: Hitachi 4GB Microdrive
Hi Tom: the *ist-D will power up again from a light touch on the shutter
The eyecup on my DS doesn't seem likely to fall off easily but it
looks very fragile. As I've always preferred the older style cups as
fitted to the M series, I replaced the DS cup with one off my ME - it
fits snugly and is actually better suited to the DS than the ME (where
the cup had to be
Quoting keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What a beautiful shrub!
Never having heard of it, I tried Google.
http://farrer.riv.csu.edu.au/ASGAP/a-pub.html
Small wonder I hadn't!
Near extinction! Bloody shame!
It's probably reasonably well preserved in its remnant areas and it's
a tough
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice one Brian.
Wild flower season is almost upon us. :-)
Thanks Dave - wildflower season might be a bit disappointing here this
year due to the extended drought.
Cheers,
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Western
Of course, Herb. That goes without saying.
Evidently it matters enough to Adobe and the development of Photoshop
to put in the effort. The kind of performance work being done in this
area is well beyond what can be done with the compiler's code
optimization. The person at Adobe responsible
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Your package arrived today ;-))
Glad to hear it. The USPS often amazes me at how quickly they get
letters and small packages delivered.
Giving out misinformation doesn't seem like they're doing their job
very
well. Of course, it's
my friend is a contractor to Apple, not an employee.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Gimp, Anyone?
I probably know your friend: I worked intimately with the
What does an M eyecup look like? There's none on my MX. I saw a
picture of one on bojidar's site that looked enormous and clumsy ...
I can't use anything like that due to my glasses.
Godfrey
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
The eyecup on my DS doesn't seem likely to fall
My last stint in the compiler team was as a contractor too, Herb.
Makes no difference: I probably know him if he's been working with
the team at all.
Godfrey
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
my friend is a contractor to Apple, not an employee.
Herb
- Original
I just scored a pair of SMCP-M35/2.8's that both need the aperture
blades cleaned of oil.
While I'm at it I want to clean the rest and re-lube.
I've heard a couple of people mention a synthetic grease that won't
migrate back onto the blades, I can't find that reference now.
Does anyone know of a
Dr. Ken Zadeck. i probably see him about once a month since he lives near
me. he has few kind words to say about people who screw up implementing
25-year old technology.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday,
Yes, I've met Ken a couple of times.
Listen, I'm not going to get into a name-calling hissy-spat here.
Compilers are very complex software projects: the gcc compiler suite
is probably a larger code base than Mac OS X itself, and it has been
pummeled, tweaked, beaten up, and shoved around
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What does an M eyecup look like? There's none on my MX. I saw a
picture of one on bojidar's site that looked enormous and clumsy
...
I can't use anything like that due to my glasses.
Godfrey
Yes - well it's the same as the one on
Actually, Shel, you are physiologically incorrect.
The sphincter you have in mind (the anal one, I
presume) =prevents= fecal waste from passing.
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the third or fourth time I've had delivery
problems with FedEx.
What a bunch of
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Your package arrived today ;-))
Glad to hear it. The USPS often amazes me at how quickly they get
letters and small packages delivered.
Show 'em the photos of *my* package Godders!
--
Mark
In a message dated 9/1/2005 6:39:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Monty Python's Flying Circus
===
Hmmm, didn't work.
Try beer, wine, coffee, motorcycles, or cars. That should.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Shel, you are physiologically incorrect.
The sphincter you have in mind (the anal one, I
presume) =prevents= fecal waste from passing.
Say Rick, are you going to Chicago? I'm off to France tomorrow to meet
Lisa at the SPP meeting.
--
Mark
Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a great time but...
n0 50 are you crazy? ; )
I still may take the 50, even though it's kind of close to the 43. I'll
decide at the last minute, probably...
(Plane departs at 12:45 tomorrow!)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
In a message dated 9/1/2005 2:05:47 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a DS which I purchased in November of last year. When I shoot
for more than a few frames (like, concert photography) at ISO800,
there are 13 (!!) pixels of varying shades and brightnesses that are
Hi Peter,
Since you're willing to camp try this site:
www.reserveamerica.com
It let's you reserve campsites so you can be
sure of getting a place to pitch your tent.
Look forward to meeting you in San Francisco.
Regards,
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Peter Lacus [mailto:[EMAIL
I have had problems with them too.
Typical scenario with UPS is that the lens arrives in Albuquerque on
Thursday night. I know it is in Albuquerque, and it would be nice to
have it over the weekend. UPS will not let me pick it up. I get the lens
on Monday. This has happened, I think, three
After my first couple of experiences of having packages FedEX'ed, I
just found it too hard knowing that it was within my grasp but I had
to wait an extra day or two. for this reason I no longer watch the
package tracking.
As the saying goes A watched pot never boils, this holds true when
waiting
My sympathy.
I have been having a problem with an item I ordered more than a month ago. But
I have to blame the sellers, I picked them because the said they shipped via
USPS, then the shipped it via Fed Ex Ground (The absolute worse shipping
service in the world) the other day after 8 days
The truth is that many people have had minor to severe problems with many
shippers. At one time the PO was the butt of many jokes, but it seems
they've pretty much gotten their act together, at least with parcel
shipments. I like using the PO because the items are delivered to my PO
Box, I don't
Great info ... thanks!
I've tried Vuescan a couple of times, but it always crashes my computer to
hang up or Photoshop to crash. It's happened with two or three versions
of the program. I'd really like to try it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Hot pixels become more
On Sep 1, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Show 'em the photos of *my* package Godders!
LOL ... yeah, they made a mess of that one.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/markpackage/
Godfrey
H
OK - for a while I was wondering just what you were talking
about..
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sep 1, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Show 'em the photos of *my* package Godders!
LOL ... yeah, they made a mess of that one.
On Sep 1, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
However, I think Godfrey is correct in that I'm a little cranky
because I
want this camera NOW. I couldn't have used it anyway as the place
I bought
the SD card from, who, on their web site says: We guarantee same-day
shipping before 6:00PM
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: FedEx Hoovers!
This is the third or fourth time I've had delivery problems with FedEx.
What a bunch of sphincters!
Funny you should mention shippers.
After all my rants about how much UPS sucks, I had to have a couple of
pieces
Consider camping at Kodachrome Basin.
The scenery is quite nice, and there are some food photographic
opportunities to be had there.
Devil's Garden State Park is nearby, as is Hole in the Rock.
It's a bit of a drive to Bryce through some nice countryside.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: What Are Hot Pixels?
Maybe it's time to take advantage of the 1-year warranty before it's too
late, but goodness me I don't want to be without the camera over the
holidays! Who would be the person that needed to be
My previous employer shipped between 400 and 1700 packages per day.
About 10% (give or take) were USPS. The rest were UPS. The USPS lost
more total packages than UPS! I would sometimes go weeks without
having to deal with a lost UPS package. USPS issues were a daily
occurence. Plus, at least
Take the 50. Consider it insurance. If you don't take it the 43 will
be lost/damaged/stolen on the very first day. If you do take, both
lenses will be fine. Don't believe me? Ask the Philly PDML crew
about bringing spare bodies. g
On 9/1/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan
Hmm. What hardware/RAM/OS version are you running? I've been using
Vuescan on Mac OS since about 1999 and version 2 or three. The
current v8.2.36 (released today for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux) is a
vastly improved application. You might give it a try ... it's a
2Mbyte download evaluation
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo