Yes - does appear to have possibilities. It will take a while to figure out
the best combinations of program options.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Sandy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From researchers at respectable
Jack Davis wrote:
One of my images has been in on hold status for about three days.
Anyone else had this happen?
Only four days? I had one that was on hold for over a week before they
rejected it!
What dilemma could possibly be causing such an extended period
of indecision?
I expect it's
Detroit does St. Paddy's day. Waiting in line to get into Dick
O'Dow's Pub -- at noon.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736543
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Actually, that's niot a bad idea, Mike. Perhaps this is getting a little too
close to being kitsch?
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=424461453size=o
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra:
Hi Jack
I did not find a reference to the Beta Pentax gallery on www.photo.net in
the Pentax section, the collection would probably grow faster if.
Have you seen the photos of Julie Smith, I find the overall quality amazing
considering her biography.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
I had a bunch on hold for quite a while. I asked and got a reply that
they were still under consideration. There is a group that makes the
decision and I think the On Hold ones were not unanimous keepers or
stinkers on first glance. They will be re-visited and decided. All mine
were eventually
Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110
(actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have
not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it.
I got one of my Auto110s fixed at APEX Camera Repair, in Walnut Creek,
California.
Good title.
The odd leg works.
I like the framing off to the right as in the rule STS:-)
Dave
On 3/17/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I had my Sigma 500 updated and it seems to be working fine with the
K10D now.
I hope to add a Pentax 540 later this year but I'm saving up for a big
lens purchase first.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Did some testing this afternoon. I have a birthday shoot Sunday, a one
year old. Boy i get around eh.:-)
Its my daughters dressage coaches son, i mentioned in the BW refresher psot.
I tried various settings with the 500DG super and K10D and results are
all over the place. Shooting directly(90
On Mar 17, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Doug
would you show the Leadville photo here?
greetings
Markus
http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm
Doug Brewer
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Bruce
You seem to occupy the A70-210mm lens category alone at the moment :-)
If the gallyery is a marketing instrument and I think it should be they will
have to select photos based on the used equipment too.
Maybe the chances of an acceptance rise when you use a rare lens or one
lens/body with
Hi Dave
all I can say is that I had a similar phenomen with the Metz 32 MZ-3 and
Pentax AF400-FTZ underexposing heavily in *auto* mode directly but working
quite good bounced (60 degrees) to the ceiling on the K10D. I do not
understand the logic because the flash sensor position where the same.
Sorry, the AF400-FTZ was of course in hi manual mode, the Metz in *auto*
mode.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Markus Maurer
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 10:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Anyone got the
I quess i should add, i tried in P mode Green mode and M mode at 1/60
and F 4 in a room with decent ambient light.
I had the upgrade done on the flash back in Feb.
Dave
On 3/17/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave
all I can say is that I had a similar phenomen with the Metz 32
Thanks Dough, now I remember it.
Maybe there is a point in the supposition that a photo should look good as a
thumbnail too for them?
Your photo should be presented very large IMHO to be effective, I like it.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I forgot to add the DA14 does have a focussing ring which does NOT
turn when focussing. Rare enough to be mentionned.
2007/3/17, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess it depends on your use of wide angle.
What * I * would do if I had the choice now would probably to buy the
12-24 for two
Thanks for the comparison Fiso.
The DA 18-55mm is light and has the wide 28mm I miss now on digital.
Otherwise I see no use for it *for me*, I will use my old A/M/T primes and
the A70-210mm 4.0 + Tamron 70-150mm 2.8 soft focus zoom with the K10D.
Your test shows quite a drastic difference in
Markus Maurer wrote:
Maybe there is a point in the supposition that a photo should look
good as a thumbnail too for them?
That's the impression I get.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, William Robb wrote:
Initially, I used the 31, and got it looking good, then switched to the 14,
and discovered the error was still there, so I adjusted until the 14 was
good, and restested the 31, which was also still good.
Have you checked whether your adjustment has
Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
Markus Maurer wrote:
Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens?
No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :)
Up until 1975 there was no such thing as a Pentax lens: Asahi Optical
Co. sold their
From:
Bill Owens
321 is under construction between Lenoir and Blowing Rock. I would suggest
I-77 to 421 to Boone and 105 from Boone to Linville. At the stoplight (only
one) in Linville, turn left on 221 for about 2 miles to GFM.
Or take I-40W when you come to it at Hickory and exit at
I'm glad I managed to apologize one mail in advance for my erroneous
assumption Ann!
Age is not important here :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
ann sanfedele
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Anyone know how one gets a Pentax Artist Code? I tried using their Contact
Us form this past week, but haven't heard back.
Thanks,
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page
http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730
announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard
Windows file browser know how to extract thumbnails from .PEFs
(and from a plethora
That's precisely the way we go from Gastonia
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Sessoms
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:23 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: GFM Question: Charlotte to The Mountain
From:
Bill Owens
321 is
From:
Cotty
Tom, or anyone, what's the quickest way over to GFM from I-85? Down the
26 and get off at/near Johnson City, or what about the 37 from Bluff
City? Last time (2004!) I was a passenger while tv drove the whole way
(late plane means I missed presenting my docs at the rental place)
Honestly, I wasn't bowled over or I suppose I'd remember by her stuff
specifically. I do remember hating her for seeing her name so many
times in the Premier Collection. :)
Jack
--- Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack
I did not find a reference to the Beta Pentax gallery on
Well, I went out and took some pics tonight. It's been a long time.
Broad Street in Oxford was the venue, and the place was festooned with
'fire sculpture' called Luminox - a travelling street exhibition with
huge bunsen burners, lit pendulums, zillions of wax-filled plant pots,
all belching flame
On 17/3/07, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I-85 at what city and state? AFAIK, Johnson City is in Tennessee and
I-85 doesn't go anywhere near it. Do you mean I-81?
Apologies - Yes I meant the 81.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Remember, Paul, as long as you can lay flat on your stomach on the
ground and not fall off the earth, you're not really drunk. (Irish
proverb) 8-/
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Detroit does St. Paddy's day. Waiting in line to get into Dick
O'Dow's Pub -- at noon.
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg
She don't look like no freaking Borg, man.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 17/3/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.alphoto.com/leadville.htm
I rather like that.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: PESO: Three of Four
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg
She don't look like no freaking Borg, man.
Waiting for assimilation in Detroit
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Kwan
Subject: Re: K10 Debug Mode
Initially, I used the 31, and got it looking good, then switched to the
14,
and discovered the error was still there, so I adjusted until the 14 was
good, and restested the 31, which was also still good.
Have
So, on Lawrences recommendation, I went and fiddled with the AF offset, and
decided that at distance, the camera now had some front focus issues. A few
tweaks later, and now I have neutral focus at distance, but the camera will
now have some back focus, though not as much as when I started, at
Well she was learning from the pro in the gallery. I think she got
some extra consideration in the early goings. As they were building
up the Premier Collection, the earlier you got on board, the better
your chances. I think they are going to have an issue down the road,
because if that gallery
Bruce Dayton wrote:
The real thing to remember is this is a show off gallery for Pentax
equipment. Much more than it is a show off gallery for the
photographer. So they are looking for some cliched images - many of
which she has produced. They want some really punchy colors and
classic
I'm with Cotty here.
And that is not because you are our guy Markus.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: 15. mars 2007 00:20
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: PESO:High flyer
On
That sentence was specially designed for you Marnie ;-)
You responded exactly as expected. Does that make me a bad person?
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16.
Thanks Dave. Having some fun on the street these days. Gotta do
something to pass the time until I land a new job.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 5:40 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Good title.
The odd leg works.
I like the framing off to the right as in the rule STS:-)
Dave
On 3/17/07, Paul
I think it's also a matter of showing off the equipment in general.
Photos that appear sharp with well delineated edges seem to please
the Pentax folk. And, hell, it's their website. They are using it for
promotional purposes. Their choices probably make sense to them.
Although some calls
William Robb escribió:
I meant to reply earlier. Is she a good example of a Pyrenees by European
standard? She looks quite a bit different from what we see here.
William Robb
I have a Mountain of the Pyrenees (female, almost 10 years old), known
as Great Pyrenees in North America. I
She's very good, and her work deserves all the attention it is getting.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Honestly, I wasn't bowled over or I suppose I'd remember by her stuff
specifically. I do remember hating her for seeing her name so many
times in the Premier Collection.
Huh? That one went whizzing right by my ear pal:-).
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg
She don't look like no freaking Borg, man.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Maybe the chances of an acceptance rise when you use a rare lens or one
lens/body with no entries yet?
greetings
Markus
Hi. I thought about that in some of my shots. A lot were taken using
a SMCP K 135/2.5 which was not on the database and selectable in their
pull-down menu. But they were
Huh? That one went whizzing right by my ear pal:-).
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg
She don't look like no freaking Borg, man.
Referencing the Star Trek Voyager
Okay, don't watch much television.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Huh? That one went whizzing right by my ear pal:-).
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Bong Manayon wrote:
Maybe the chances of an acceptance rise when you use a rare
lens or one lens/body with no entries yet?
Hi. I thought about that in some of my shots. A lot were taken using
a SMCP K 135/2.5 which was not on the database and selectable in their
pull-down menu. But they
I agree that they seem to be going for the more universally read image.
Pretty..bright..colorful..obvious. Edgy and ethereal will likely find
more limited access.
Some culling/rotation may take place in the name of opportunities for
more shooters.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty's Review Decision:
Highly Recommended So Go By The Motherloving Thing If You'd Been Umming
And Ahhing.
Never seen the bag, but I'm giving it a Highly Recommended (just) - I've
heard it if you put your camera in it, it makes your jpegs softer.
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Crazy -
The deer are much more interesting than the bear
OF course I remember your Mistic shot - cause I saw you shooting it :)
At least they too that one!
ann
David J Brooks wrote:
My approved gallery shots.
On 3/18/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: I just noticed today that their lens series list doesn't include
the original K k-mount lenses! I had to list my K 15/3.5 as the A
version.
Also, Bong, I noticed that you and I are the only two people to have
submitted photos shot with
David Savage wrote:
On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1
The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop
sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens
development strategy. And who would
Seven of Nine was the Borg character from Star Trek: Voyager
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Huh? That one went whizzing right by my ear pal:-).
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks for posting that. The extension works like a charm.
John Francis wrote:
There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page
http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730
announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard
Yes Ann, Takumars are Pentax lenses.
ann sanfedele wrote:
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Mark
I left them an email and had an artist code one day later.
Since nearly all of my photos are made on film and with old equipment I miss
a lot of M/A lenses and the complete Spotmatic/Takumar series
From:
Bill Owens
I think, Bill, that he was referring to the part from the airport to
I-85. Think as someone who hasn't a clue of what is what and where is
where. Since you worked there a million years or so, you ought to be
able to give those directions. I have driven that 10-12 times
From:
Bong Manayon
Well...sort of, so I made him his own website:
http://www.khalil.uni.cc
Bong
PS pardon the navigation...we're still arguing where each button leads to
The only problem I have with the navigation is the Back button doesn't
take you back to the preceding page, it takes
We're still arguing about that :-)
Bong
On 3/18/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From:
Bong Manayon
Well...sort of, so I made him his own website:
http://www.khalil.uni.cc
Bong
PS pardon the navigation...we're still arguing where each button leads to
The only
From:
Cotty
On 16/3/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
t's very hilly here and years
ago, when this was a city of factories and working class people who
walked to work, they constructed dozens and dozens of sets of stairs up
and down the hills. They're all over the
She is without question. I went back and looked at her work. Some nice
things technically very well handled.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She's very good, and her work deserves all the attention it is
getting.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
After seeing all the hubbub with this stuff on DPReview.com, I
decided to leave my camera alone and do the fw 1.11 update. The AF is
close enough and produces excellent results. If I really need
critical focusing, I focus manually and use a focusing magnifier. It
only makes sense if I'm
From:
Joseph Tainter
http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1
The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop
sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens
development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors?
Based on the other
From:
Paul Stenquist
You can probably buy another one for less than it would cost to repair
it. Even the super usually goes for quite a bit less than $100 US.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:55 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110
From:
John Celio
Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110
(actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have
not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it.
I got one of my Auto110s fixed at APEX Camera Repair, in Walnut
From:
Bill Owens
That's precisely the way we go from Gastonia
Bill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Sessoms
Or take I-40W when you come to it at Hickory and exit at Morganton. From
there, take NC 181 up to Linville. That'll put you about 2 miles
Have you been taking lessons from Ken Rockwell® and DPReview?
Peter Loveday wrote:
Cotty's Review Decision:
Highly Recommended So Go By The Motherloving Thing If You'd Been Umming
And Ahhing.
Never seen the bag, but I'm giving it a Highly Recommended (just) - I've
heard it if you
Or he's technologically illiterate, and is just parroting a buzzword for
something similar to what he was actually told.
Adam Maas wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1
The poster is a
On 3/18/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Not much else you can say about it. I prefer the black - I also got a
small FX5-B for hauling a spare TV camera battery about on location -
and that is sand (khaki) in colour. A bit to bright for me. Black is
stealth
In my high school days
On 3/18/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, Bong, I noticed that you and I are the only two people to have
submitted photos shot with the MX at this point :)
I have to admit that yours is a much nicer shot than mine. That Salt
Shaker Caps image is a stunner!
The statue is your
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2468804/7#136711608-L-LB
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
on my way north to visit Wheatfield
http://tinyurl.com/2bf87d
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Markus Maurer wrote:
I'm glad I managed to apologize one mail in advance for my erroneous
assumption Ann!
Age is not important here :-)
greetings
Markus
You will think differently when you are older, Markus :) hehe
I was joking around about this all along but, in fact, my memory is
I've submitted a number of shots taken with the SMC Pentax 85/1.8. I
marked the lens as unknown and listed it in the comments. They took a
few of these. One is even in the collection. And it's not bright and
colorful, by the way.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bong
So what. Pointless.
On Mar 17, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Seven of Nine was the Borg character from Star Trek: Voyager
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Huh? That one went whizzing right by my ear pal:-).
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/3/07, Paul Stenquist,
Not exactly shot this week but I was working on some photos and this
one just seemed to suit my mood best...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/13.htm
Comments, critique, and flames always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: PESO: Three of Four
Seven of Nine was the Borg character from Star Trek: Voyager
I always thought of her as BILF.
However, I am a self admitted pig.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In your case it may well be worth it. I have an auto 110 kit, new in
the box. But it's not the super.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 10:29 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Paul Stenquist
You can probably buy another one for less than it would cost to
repair
it. Even the super usually goes for
I like that.
At first I wondered about the strange reflections across the image until the
penny dropped.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Very nice, Ann. Excellent composition, beautiful sky.
Paul
On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:34 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
on my way north to visit Wheatfield
http://tinyurl.com/2bf87d
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele
Subject: PESO: bus stop
Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
on my way north to visit Wheatfield
http://tinyurl.com/2bf87d
Perhaps you shouldn't have been
On 3/18/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: PESO: Three of Four
Seven of Nine was the Borg character from Star Trek: Voyager
I always thought of her as BILF.
However, I am a self admitted pig.
LOL
Dave
--
PDML
Like I said, pointless.
On Mar 18, 2007, at 12:13 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what. Pointless.
Your title Three of Four...Seven of Nine. Us sci-fi tragics make
these kinds of connections.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
You know...the interesting thing about this gallery is that I am
actually seeing how some of you looks like :-D
I've yet to post a photo of myself in my profile (in a twisted
sense--I am vain); maybe after Boris does...
Bong
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hmmm not the pic I meant to show.actually
thats the one I use for my card.
the tinyurl went bananas on me I guess.
anyway -- this should be a geso then
the
the new shot is the Hackensack bus stop taken from the bus window/
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2468804#136711608-L-LB
i'm
90% of the stuff on this list is pointless.
What's your point!
Dave :-)
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, pointless.
On Mar 18, 2007, at 12:13 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what. Pointless.
Your title
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele
Subject: PESO: bus stop
Shouldn't ahve been working on this stuff but I felt like it --
This was from the trip across the country in 2005 -
on my way north to visit Wheatfield
http://tinyurl.com/2bf87d
Perhaps you
Perhaps it's time I unsubscribe. 90% is far too high a percentage.
On Mar 18, 2007, at 12:30 AM, David Savage wrote:
90% of the stuff on this list is pointless.
What's your point!
Dave :-)
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, pointless.
On Mar 18, 2007, at
someone, I forgot who, found the first watermarks I did on smugmug were
distracting and i agreed.
have a new one in place, as those who look at the bus stop peso will see.
mainly serves more as a signature than a serious watermark.
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Brian Walters wrote:
I like that.
At first I wondered about the strange reflections across the image until the
penny dropped.
Cheers
Brian
Hehe - thanks Brian - remember, don't pick the penny back up unless it
is heads up :)
ann
++
Brian Walters
I like this as well. The reflections make it unique.
Paul
On Mar 18, 2007, at 12:27 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Hmmm not the pic I meant to show.actually
thats the one I use for my card.
the tinyurl went bananas on me I guess.
anyway -- this should be a geso then
the
the new shot is
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what. Pointless.
Your title Three of Four...Seven of Nine. Us sci-fi tragics make
these kinds of connections.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi Mark and Bong
I like the Salt Shaper Cap photo a lot as well.
BTW I haven't seen a dog or cat picture in the gallery, maybe that is too
sweet for Pentax :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Sent: Sunday, March
This one made me chuckle. Nice shot!
--
Bruce
Saturday, March 17, 2007, 9:00:14 PM, you wrote:
GD Not exactly shot this week but I was working on some photos and this
GD one just seemed to suit my mood best...
GDhttp://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/13.htm
GD Comments, critique,
Here is a visual proof.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17066full=1
Boris
P.S. A bit of sand went into lowest leg clamp of my monopod. Is it a
good idea to spray it with machine oil??? Thanks.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Only 50%?
David Savage wrote:
90% of the stuff on this list is pointless.
What's your point!
Dave :-)
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, pointless.
On Mar 18, 2007, at 12:13 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 3/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello ann,
I looked at the Sparks, NV and bus stop. In fact, I looked at them
all. You do have a good eye for this kind of stuff. Making the
ordinary just a bit special and worth looking at. Sparks is my
favorite. Glad you shared with us.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 17, 2007,
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello ann,
I looked at the Sparks, NV and bus stop. In fact, I looked at them
all. You do have a good eye for this kind of stuff. Making the
ordinary just a bit special and worth looking at. Sparks is my
favorite. Glad you shared with us.
Thanks Bruce,
I use that
On 3/18/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a visual proof.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17066full=1
Cheater :-)
It looks a little soft IMO could do with a slight levels adjustment
to bring up the highlights.
P.S. A bit of sand went into lowest leg clamp of my
101 - 200 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
