Exquisite!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I've been back from Italy for over a week and haven't posted any
photos. Until now. I'm keeping very busy with my Photoshop book but I
had to make time for at least one image from Italy.
This is in
I concur. Although when I first saw the lens in your hands, Jaume, I
did not expect to own it some day. I should point that it is not that
heavy given the speed and zoom range. It is rather well made although
indeed eventually the zoom becomes creepy. It does have the zoom look
that is handy for
John, can it be that any authorized camera service willing give your
sensor a proper cleaning would do? It seems to me that an experienced
camera technician (not necessarily exclusive to Pentax brand) could
help you and obviously, to clean a sensor won't cost you an arm and a
leg.
On Tue, Jul 23,
Thanks, Brian!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Brian Walters
apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
G'day all
A great gallery with plenty of variety.
A few favourites:
Bob's 'Looking for a mate' - just fantastic
Aahz's 'Endicott Sunset' - stunning colour
Gerrit's 'Done Fishing' - simple but
Bob and I met up with Rick who's over on a fleeting visit. We had a
pleasant couple of hours in Greenwich where my son Pete also joined
us. Here's a snap of Rick when I found him by the Cutty Sark:
http://www.zen50061.zen.co.uk/PDML/DSCF2569.jpg
And here he is at the Old Brewery where we had
CRIS won't perform ny repairs without your authorization. They're quite
reasonable and willing to negotiate.
Paul
On Jul 24, 2013, at 2:23 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
John, can it be that any authorized camera service willing give your
sensor a proper cleaning would do? It
On 23/07/2013 9:42 PM, Walt wrote:
On 7/23/2013 6:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
No Walt, I won't
give you my 77ltd so that I have an excuse to by the 85/1.4.
I'm glad you didn't have to see me flounce out of the room and slam
the door just now.
I didn't let having a 77 stop me from buying an
Thanks for the comments so far. Given me some things to think about. I
have a fader ND filter at 67mm dia, so the Pentax 17-70 would fit it,
but leery of the SDM from what i have read previously. I don
t need IS as its in the K-5 body so that would be a wasted Sigma
feature. Decisions decisions.
One of local Pentaxians had 17-70/4. The SDM failed on him and being a
handy person he took it apart. I won't repeat what he told me so as
not to insult anyone. It was a very strong arguments against the SDM
lenses, at least the cheaper ones.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:27 PM, David J Brooks
Fader filters don't work too well below 70mm, especially as you get to
the higher levels of filtering. An X tends to appear in the image due
to the design of the filter.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:27 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the comments so far. Given me some
Thanks, Brian. Excellent stuff. There certainly are many talented
photographers in the group. Bob's looking for a mate immediately caught my
eye too. From the thumbnail I initially thought Gerrit's Done Fishing was
a windsurfer.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Brian Walters
Sent:
what did he say? why would we be insulted? if its poorly built, its
poorly built.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
One of local Pentaxians had 17-70/4. The SDM failed on him and being a
handy person he took it apart. I won't repeat what he told me so as
I don't know what's more amazing, that they think that anyone would pay
$600. for it or that they still have 5 brand new ones in stock.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0028N7442/ref=pe_62860_31277760_email_1p_3_lm
--
There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive
The makeover looks good. When I was there last, they were still busy.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:14 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESOs: Micro PDLM meeting in Greenwich
Bob and I met up with Rick who's over on a fleeting
Boris said: ...indeed eventually the zoom becomes creepy
Boris, I have found this to be a general phenomenon; as things age, they start
to appear creepy to others. You'll find out soon enough!
stan
On Jul 24, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I concur. Although when I first saw the
LOL...so true.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Boris said: ...indeed eventually the zoom becomes creepy
Boris, I have found this to be a general phenomenon; as things age, they
start to appear creepy to others. You'll find out soon enough!
An addition to my on-going Long Lake 2013 gallery, this is a shot of one of
Ann's favorite critters. Last featured performing hazardous duty as a escort to
a loon, today we see the intrepid drone at rest on the dock . . .
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p769975649/h6f441a6f#h6f441a6f
stan
--
Pretty much he said that it was shameful engineering...
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
what did he say? why would we be insulted? if its poorly built, its
poorly built.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
One of
Well, I was expecting that someone would notice my use of the word
creepy... And so it came to be ;-).
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL...so true.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Boris said:
I have the 16-45, but the wobbly barrel is killing my corners
randomly. In portrait the upper half tends to get soft. I have two
copies of this lens. The one I'm using now is very good when it is
sharp, but inconsistent. I would pay to have one of them tightened,
but I'm afraid that it will just
i think the big problem is that the lubricant seizes on the sdm motors
rendering them useless. my guess is that they've fixed SDM now that
they finally admitted it was faulty. they should have offered to fix
everyone's lenses. way to stand by your products pentax! fuji bit the
bullet and replaced
Ken, Bob and Bruce, thanks for looking and thanks for your comments.
I liked the shape of the group in my original PESO, despite the OoF
flowers at the top. I decided to take your advice, and cropped the
image:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17471959
I hope this is an improvement.
Very nice portrait of Rick.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Chris Mitchell
chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
Bob and I met up with Rick who's over on a fleeting visit. We had a
pleasant couple of hours in Greenwich where my son Pete
WOW! That image is quite special. That is the way HDR should be used.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I've been back from Italy for over a week and haven't posted any
photos. Until
You don't really want to look inside any modern autofocus lens.
Compared to even the cheapest old brass and glass manual focus lens
they appear to be made of well the best was I can describe it is cheap
roughly finished stampings. The Japanese especially have a knack of
reducing the cost and
Back home from my NY trip. Travel home was difficult. However, New York was fun
... On Sunday, my brother and I had a moment to get down to the Guggenheim for
the James Turrell exhibit. Marvelous ... catch it if you can.
Some photos from the excursion..
Zos, he was referring to very low quality of plastics used in the
moving parts of the mechanism and in general to very poor engineering
quality of the whole mechanism. But again - we're playing a broken
phone here. Suffices it to say, I opted not to buy DA 17-70 and
ultimately decided to stay with
I wouldn't know for sure, but I would guess it does show his best side.
On 7/24/2013 9:30 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Very nice portrait of Rick.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Chris Mitchell
chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
Bob
All good. Especially like the tones and clean lines in the first one,
and the light and shadowed figures in #4. Very fine.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
Back home from my NY trip. Travel home was difficult. However, New York was
fun ... On
screw drive for the win! :)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Zos, he was referring to very low quality of plastics used in the
moving parts of the mechanism and in general to very poor engineering
quality of the whole mechanism. But again - we're playing
Zos, you have to realize that availability of service, its quality and
the fact that I normally don't have backup for everything (such as
every lens, etc) are important factors here. If you have good service
and have sufficiently many lenses, the SDM may not pose that much of
an issue.
On Wed,
Wow Stan, that's really close up!
Were you using the 35mm Macro?
Nice and crisp.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
An addition to my on-going Long Lake 2013 gallery, this is a shot of one of
Ann's favorite critters. Last featured
We'll worry if the loon goes missing now
ann
On 7/24/2013 09:15, Stan Halpin wrote:
An addition to my on-going Long Lake 2013 gallery, this is a shot of one of
Ann's favorite critters.
Last featured performing hazardous duty as a escort to a loon, today
we see the intrepid drone at rest
Nice series... fun shot of the people lying on the floor photoing the
lights - nice minamalist Guggenheim view.
Sorry not to see you , as you know, but not sorry to have missed the
light show and the crowds there.
Godders is understating his travel difficulties - you see there was this
P.J.,
What a bargain!
Directly from Amazon, it costs almost twice as much.
Hurry up, just one left!
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002OHDBZS/?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
:-)
(oops, that's a kit, but anyway...)
Cheers,
Igor
Wed Jul 24 08:44:10 EDT 2013
P.J. Alling wrote:
I don't know what's
I have a minty K-7 I'll sell you for $500.. :P
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
P.J.,
What a bargain!
Directly from Amazon, it costs almost twice as much.
Hurry up, just one left!
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002OHDBZS/?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
Super excellent gallery. Kudos to every poster. The best caption goes to
Alan Cole. Hippo Surfing . A title I shall never have an opportunity
to use.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:33:47 -0400
From: David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
(This is not OT, since the original image was created with my Pentax K-5.)
I mentioned in a previous thread, my interest in Alternative
Processes. That interest was reawakened at our local Art in the Park
a couple of Sunday's ago. There was a Nebraska practitioner of
Alternative Processes there
Only $24.00
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/313120-Holga-Lens-for-Pentax-DSLR-Cameras
You to can have that unique image quality.
--
There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive
failure, and those that will.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'm sure it would. The guy who comes to GFM is not exclusively Pentax.
He's mostly CaNikon. I don't have any idea where I'd find a guy who only
cleans Pentax sensors.
On 7/24/2013 2:23 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
John, can it be that any authorized camera service willing give your
sensor a proper
9356262623 is the most excellent abstract.
What are the people lying on the floor looking at?
On 7/24/2013 9:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Back home from my NY trip. Travel home was difficult. However, New
York was fun ... On Sunday, my brother and I had a moment to get down
to the
You didn't even mention the Pentax K110D 6.1MP Digital SLR kit for
$829.99 or the Pentax K100D 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera for $829.99
On 7/24/2013 8:44 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I don't know what's more amazing, that they think that anyone would pay
$600. for it or that they still have 5 brand new
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/dolomite1.jpg
K-5 and DA*16-50/2.8
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The fates of the god's were with you. Clouds, hills, a bit of snow, rocks,
grassy slopes, a winding road some hikers. It's got it all. What an
amazing scene.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:54 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
Simple snapshot my ass. As I said elsewhere it's an effervescent mug
of does not suck.
This Italy you speak of appears as if it might be a photogenic
travel destination. Also: Your camera takes good pictures.
:)
:)
:)
Wonderful stuff!
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Out of the city
WOW Mark, the hits keep coming !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Subject: Another shot from Italy. Mountains this time
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched
kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/dolomite1.jpg
K-5 and DA*16-50/2.8
WOW Mark, the hits keep coming !
I
That is a very fine image!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
Will be interested to see where you go using some of the old processes.
Some nice stuff on his web site. Did he say what his Wisconsin
destination was going to be?
-p
On 7/24/2013 11:31 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
(This is not OT, since the original image was created with my Pentax K-5.)
I
I took part in a charity event, recently, the specific details of which
I wish to forget. Since I was taking part and not rececording it for
posterity, or posterior, (the latter seems somehow more appropriate), I
only took along my old trusty *ist-Ds and the M40mm f2.8. It was a team
even
You oversmarted your website.
I get:
http://www.robertstech.com/errordocs/hotlink.jpe
Hotlinking to files at robertstech is not permitted.
(accesesed in FF under Win7 from
http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2013-July/352650.html )
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/dolomite1.jpg
--
Wonderful. Superb composition and rendering.
Paul
On Jul 24, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/dolomite1.jpg
K-5 and
A friend just pointed me to http://thewirecutter.com
It seems that they do far more in depth reviews than other places, and
cite other reviews in their reviews.
Their mid-level DSLR review is on the D7100,
http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-best-mid-range-dslr-is-the-nikon-d7100/
And, they
They look ready for an eating contest or beer drinking :-)
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.J. Alling
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 4:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- The Team.
I took part in a charity event,
Of course, I meant PDML. Must have been a semi-concious slip as we
were telling Rick about the last London PDML gathering with Godfrey
where there was no Pentax kit at all and thought that the group might
need a new name...
On 24 July 2013 08:14, Chris Mitchell chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
The inability to use m42 lenses (without an adapter that contains an
optical element for infinity focusing) is the main reason I would not
have a Nikon. Love to experiment with those legacy lenses. And in-body
image stabilization is a biggie feature, for me.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:07 PM,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 04:42:44PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
The inability to use m42 lenses (without an adapter that contains an
optical element for infinity focusing) is the main reason I would not
have a Nikon. Love to experiment with those legacy lenses. And in-body
image stabilization is
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
--
Hugs and backrubs
I use all of the limited number of AF points that Pentax provides. Eg:
the two upper corners of the 9-square land nicely on eyes in
portraits. The outliers are good for faces in full-body shots. Etc.
39 would be both good and bad. With the Pentax cluster, it takes only
a moment to steer over to
Larry Colen wrote:
A friend just pointed me to http://thewirecutter.com
It seems that they do far more in depth reviews than other places, and
cite other reviews in their reviews.
Their mid-level DSLR review is on the D7100,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
I think it would be a big help for birds in flight. On Pentax bodies,
it's easy for the bird to slip in between the sites, or outside the
area
Apparently Nikon is playing with a 75 mp camera ouch
DAVE
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
A friend just pointed me to http://thewirecutter.com
It seems that they do far more in depth reviews than other places, and
cite other
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Does anyone actually use those multiple
Once you're into that sort of farting around with af points you are essentially
focusing manually.
B
On 24 Jul 2013, at 23:55, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I use all of the limited number of AF points that Pentax provides. Eg:
the two upper corners of the 9-square land nicely
Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
on 2013-07-24 17:04 Bob W wrote
Once you're into that sort of farting around with af points you are essentially
focusing manually.
yeah, better would be focus peaking overlaid in the optical finder; especially
if you could hit a button to lock focus on the object where it has peaked, so
the
on 2013-07-24 7:19 Zos Xavius wrote
I have the 16-45, but the wobbly barrel is killing my corners
randomly.
yeah it's an interesting compromise of a lens; i thought all the corners were
soft
but my point was that i had carried a zoom for a long time before almost
completely switching to
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
I think it would be a big help for birds in flight. On Pentax bodies,
it's easy for the bird to
On 7/24/2013 6:15 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
I think it would be a big help for birds in flight. On
on 2013-07-24 17:15 Aahz Maruch wrote
Let me rephrase: does anyone actually use manually-selected AF points for
handheld shooting?
yes, i have done it some, particularly with DA 15mm and FA 28mm lenses; it is a
bit awkward, and i usually don't even use autofocus, but when i tried it out it
Am running internet explorer and I'm getting:
Hotlinking to files at robertstech.com is not permitted.
Never before seen. ??
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:54
I do, at least in a limited way, Mostly I use the four corners or the
center focus point. On the other hand I have a split image rangefinder
screen in my K20D so I focus and recompose on with manual lenses anyway.
On 7/24/2013 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Let me rephrase: does anyone actually use manually-selected AF points for
handheld shooting?
I use the single centre and recompose
Dave
(I did use the camera-selected AF points some during our Alaska cruise
and got limited
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:47:17PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Does anyone actually use those multiple
On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Let me rephrase: does anyone actually use manually-selected AF points for
handheld shooting?
Yes, frequently.
It was once explained to me - and this might be of interest to bird-shooters
out there - that setting the camera to
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:47:17PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Generally, for hand held shooting of static or slowly moving subjects
I'll use the center point and recompose.
When the camera is on a tripod, especially if I'm shooting in the
portrait orientation I'll select an individual focus point that's in
the right spot.
When I'm shooting sports or other
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
That's why I do what David does: center point AF, shutter half-press,
recompose. I only ever had problems with that on your K-x. ;-)
Similarly, letting the camera pick the AF points
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
I just can't even visualize the mechanics of manually selecting AF point
for handheld shooting, so I figured I'd ask whether anyone does.
If I have my camera set up on a tripod, with a
How so? I'm telling the AF what to focus on then letting it do what it
does better than me.
If you let AF focus on what it wants to you might as well hand the
camera to someone else and let them shoot what they want to as well.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I also use the Live View in some situations. All of the shots from
the church that I have posted over the last few months were focused
through the LCD and live view. The focusing point can be moved
anywhere in the frame. The camera was on a tripod. Even though
focusing is slower in live mode,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:05 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Let me rephrase: does anyone actually use manually-selected AF points for
handheld shooting?
I use the single centre and recompose
That doesn't work
gee too bad you didn't go anywhere beautiful ;-)
simple is good
ann
On 7/24/2013 14:54, Mark Roberts wrote:
Out of the city and into the mountains. No tricky HDR or stitched pano
stuff this time. Just a simple snapshot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/dolomite1.jpg
K-5 and DA*16-50/2.8
--
Wonderfully dramatic shot, Mark! Love it!
Ideal rendering.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Another shot from Italy. Mountains this time
Thanks Bob. 300mm actually. If I had had the 35mm on the camera I would have
gone lower and gotten more of its face, but the minimum focusing distance on
the 300mm would have forced me into the water to get that perspective and I
didn't want to get wet right then. Yeah, I know, a truly
No worries Ann. The loon was hanging around for 30-45 minutes late this
afternoon, just off the end of the neighbor's dock. I am about to look through
the 250-300 shots I took . . .
On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
We'll worry if the loon goes missing now
ann
On
Warning serious dog expression. I haven't got a lot of recent stuff,
been another photographic dry spell. So I went back and looked at some
of the stuff I shot with the *ist-D.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20butseriously.html
Equipment: *ist-D w/smc Pentax FA
Lovely expression. A good subject for Bruce's eyelash test.
gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.J. Alling
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- But seriously...
Warning serious dog expression.
I just got a undelivered message that my upstream mail
host has been blacklisted.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
You are coming through to this list.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just got a undelivered message that my upstream mail
host has been blacklisted.
--
Larry Colen
or.I'm beggin' you, please stop this thing and let me out.
Like the pleading fear in the eyes.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:48 PM
Subject: PESO -- But
A soldier in Afghanistan has been experimenting with making tin type
prints of his colleagues:
http://twentytwowords.com/2013/07/24/soldier-in-afghanistan-photographs-comrades-using-civil-war-era-technique-14-pics/
--
Doug Lefty Franklin
NutDriver Racing
http://NutDriver.org
Facebook NutDriver
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17468739size=lg
Comments invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
cute - you got the latin name down when you showed the other photo -
Echinacea it is, but it is cone flower not corn flower (the things you
learn having done stock nature photography)
YOu have a lot of lovely floral close-ups, Dan, - for this isn't one of
them I think for it to work the
The original FA 28-105 f4-5.6 (the power zoom one for the PZ-1)
is a bit heavy, but an unknown sleeper - fine quality lens.
But you'd still need a 15mm prime.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:13 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-07-24 7:19 Zos Xavius wrote
I have
Amen to that!
I find it difficult to use the multiple autofocus points in any
handheld shooting.
Pentax doesn't focus fast enough to select th 26th point vs the 27th.
When I try letting the camera pick the AF point, it goes all over the scene.
And not necessarily where I want.
Regards, Bob S.
On
Possible, but the unlikelyhood is
certainly positive...
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On July 25, 2013 5:03:26 AM Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I just got a undelivered message that my upstream mail
host has been blacklisted.
--
Larry Colen
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:20:46AM +0300, Boris Liberman wrote:
Possible, but the unlikelyhood is
certainly positive...
That reply has reach a unique level of definitiveness.
This was from the header of one of my bounces:
The mx1.mx3.got.net program
pdml@pdml.net: host
99 matches
Mail list logo
