How is it focusing with that thing? Is the viewfinder noticeably
brighter? As my eyes get older, I tend to like faster lenses more
because the viewfinder is brighter even if I don't need the extra stop.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
Jostein, you could sell this shot to the devlopers for PR! ;-)
Honestly, I remember seeing thsi thing from overlook near the
campgrounds at GFM and thought it was such an eyesore. Nonetheless,
just drive around the area and you can see the retirement population
growing as well. We have some of
I think people are more likely to quote a number simply because the
number is right there to see. With film, it wasn't being prominently
displayed in front of our faces all the time. I also think some folks
are expressing surprise at how their shooting habits have changed.
Different habits will
LOL. I may work on the stealth chimping mode.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/24/2004 6:51:00 PM >>>
On 24/12/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleas
I used to have the instant preview on so I could check the histogram.
That got old really fast. As someone mentioned, it's either too brief
to help of too long not to be annoying, and it lights up like a neon
sign. I check in playback mode, when I have time or just get bored. Of
course, for an i
As spell checker goofs go, I like that one. I probably typed in
"cherval" , however. Serval cats. Some nice pics at
http://www.hdw-inc.com/wildcatsphotos17.htm
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL
I have a colleague whose wife breeds cats that are a mix of chervil and
domestic cats. They can hit about 30 lbs. I'm not sure I trust cats
that large ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTEC
Sort of. I bought my first SLR in 1972 (SP500) and built-in meters were
pretty standard. The meter broke and I couldn't fix it then (16 and no
money) so I used Tri-X and guessed. Of course, it usually worked.
I always use Lithium. They do cost more, but ultimatley save money in
terms of the effects of stress on my health ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2004
Just to note, the DS will have a pentaprism. Look at the specs on
Adorama.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/22/2004 11:08:57 AM >>>
Hi!
> Not being one of the "digitally-enabled" yet, I wonder what the
> ~principal~ differences are between the *ist DS and the *ist D.
> Sure, I can compare the features a
The D70 appears to be the darling of the photomags, and seems to be
better than the Rebel D. Pop Photo just gave a nice write-up to the DS,
which I got to read while spending 7 quality hours in newstands in
Charlotte ariport last weekend.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/2004 10:18:16 AM >>>
D70 bod
Best of Luck! It's amazing that stuff has gotten so "routine". I've
read that they are trying to develop robot surgeons that will be able to
operate on the heart while its beating. The bad news is the robot will
probably want a separate fee.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington
The only problem I have had is that when I first got the camera it
failed to read the aperture setting electronically on several of my FA
lenses. This problem "went away" after about a week. I suspect that
despite all my cleaning attempts, some coating on one of the contacts
had to wear off. Aft
Good stuff. I love the geometry of desert landscapes.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/7/2004 9:02:45 PM >>>
Nice work Larry. White Sands is one of my favorit
Actually, I went as a dust bunny. ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/6/2004 8:21:28 PM >>>
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:00:01 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAI
Glad to hear your son is better. Nothing feels worse than a sick
child.
Odd as it was, I immediately thought of the "Two Sheds" Monty Python
skit when I read your Email. How do you like the sound of "One Shed
Canning"? Or maybe there's another . . .
Great. Go out, take few thousand pictures, and tell us what you think
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/5/2004 11:38:30 AM >>>
Hi!
Just some minutes ago I go
better.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/26/2004 9:46:10 PM >>>
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:38:48 -0400, Steve Desjardins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
Definitely. I just meant in terms of efficiency.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/26/2004 12:14:05 PM >>>
- Original Message -
There are many activities (music) that have no real benefit except that
someone exnjoys it.
I was a bit puzzled by your comment about jumbo jets. They are
actually pretty efficient even though they use a lot of fuel because
they move so much stuff. They are certainly more efficient than trucks.
Didn't know you were one of the faithful, Ann. Don't you live in NY?
The WS oughta be fun. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/2004 1:14:18 PM >>>
Too bad
Good luck Tom.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
never shows nudes of any kind (photos of real people,
not photos of naked statues) because the reaction is so unpredictable.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/19/2004 12:19:36 PM >>>
See below:
Chris Stoddart wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
>
>>A
ts and are without artistic
merit.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Desjardins"
> Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Spare some sex?
>
>
> > Yeah, that is really good. Nice use of the artistic filter, and a
> > intriguing facial expression.
>
Yeah, that is really good. Nice use of the artistic filter, and a
intriguing facial expression.
Yet this is exactly the kind of shot that straddles the
art/pornography line. Which it is depends on the viewer.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/19/2004 2:19:11 AM >>>
Sorry Paul,
I didn't want to raise o
they are similar or better in quality & design, have all the original
features plus new ones. This leads to a preference for the new models
over
the old ones.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Actually, Ive notcie that Pentax MF prices have
he only one of five or six recent pics that may fit your
description.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We've seen enough of Shel's work to safely say that this is the kind
of
> photography he favo
I'd take something with he perspective of a 50, i.e., a 50 or a 35 for
the *ist D. OTOH, I always like something a little on the Tele side, so
I'd take a 50. On the third hand, however, there are many zooms that
would do the job quality wise.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washingto
We've seen enough of Shel's work to safely say that this is the kind of
photography he favors. In general, I think he likes photos that make
social commentary, and certainly not always negative ones. ( Sorry to
talk about you in the third person, Shel)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/18/2004 11:03:21 AM
I'm with Frank on this one. It's technically very good and socially
very sad, which si why it's such a powerful photo. I don't think they
are many changes that would make a significant improvement.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/17/2004 10:14:47 AM >>>
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:42:07 -0700, Shel Belinko
Actually, Ive notcie that Pentax MF prices have dropped a lot at KEH.
You can now get a bargain 645 body for $200 USD whereas I paid $300 two
years ago. It also looked like the 67 prices were dropping too, although
I don't follow those as closely.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washin
Does "&*^%#$%" count?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an interesting point. I thought these shutters were rated for
about 100,000 or so. You could reach that a lot quicker with a DSLR.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL
Nice hat. I also like the see-through camo in front of the Stars and
Bars.
You could melt them down to make monopods for 1Ds Mark II's.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/24/2004 11:50:06 PM >>>
Nah. Most Leicas haven't been used in the last 20 years. I don't
think unavailability of film would present any problem with most
owners. :)
Chris
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:04:21 -040
I read the article about the new Minolta in pop photo, but thinking back
now I am confused by something. I don't have the magazine here to
check, but I swear they said they put a 500 mirror lens on the camera
and that the image stabilized through the viewfinder when they engaged
IS. How could the
I went to see"Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" last tonight. The
movie was entertaining and there were some funny running photography
jokes, although I found it dragged a bit at times. I found the whole
image quality of the movie interesting, however. (Since the
backgrounds were almost co
Nice composition and mood. I really like the grading of the blue/gray
tones.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glad to hear it. You folks have had a rough couple of months, and
Jeanne is still coming. The remnants of Ivan are getting here now, but
that will mostly be rain and flooding.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540)
Just a comment: I think the folks on this list really overestimate the
importance of extreme wide angles. Most of the market for these kinds of
cameras use mostly telephotos, so that concentrating the pixels into a
smaller space is an advantage. The noise issue for the "denser sensor"
remains, of
But Frank, it's . . . sharp. ;-)
I really like the onlookers. The bike guy is doing something extreme,
and they look so nonchalant.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really? I guess I hear much more about the Natural Bridge track, which
is an dirt oval.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/5/2004 3:29:06 PM >>>
Steve wrote:
>Really nice work.
Thanks very much.
>Where exactly is this track?
Just north of Waynesboro on US 340, not an hour from
your office door.
--Joh
Congrats. Now we'll really get to see how many shots you can rack up on
that *istD.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really nice work. Where exactly is this track?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone had mentioned this a while ago and I had dismissed it as a dumb
idea. Clearly i should have knwon better. The SD card works fine but
typically DSLR users want big cards. I guess Pentax is not thinking of
the Baby D as a backup to the *istD.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/4/2004 9:24:24 AM >>>
My German is a little weak, i.e., no-existent, but this page actually
refers to the new DSLR as the "baby" *ist D. It's interesting because I
thought that designation actually originated on the PDML.
The DA 14 is EXTRA limited.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/3/2004 5:29:03 PM >>>
Or
"The Limited digital Camera of the Officials"
DagT
På 3. sep. 2004 kl. 23.21 skrev Jostein:
> "The official digital camera of the Limited."
>
> Jostein
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PR
I lie the first one better. I think the more "cluttered" shot is much
more interesting.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/3/2004 10:35:55 AM >>>
I like the second on. Less cluttered, alowing the eye to concentrate
on
the musician's concentration.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
>Since I like Valentin's idea of as
I think that this might be an acceptable loss given the smooth
operation. Also, I never notice the viewfinder as being particularly
dark. OTOH, that was a f2-2.4 zoom.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
Bottom line here: Some of us would rather work on a computer than in a
darkroom. I'm one of them. I sincerely hope that both film and digital
prosper for many years because I know the pleasure of pursing a favorite
pastime. There will always be a certain satisfaction of using film and
making pri
A couple of things:
1. I'm not in any great rush to move up to an 8 or 10 MP camera. 6 Mp
is working fine for me, although I'll probably buy a better DSLR at some
point because it seems I get the bug to buy a new camera every 5 or 6
years. And, since the *istD doesn't take a proprietary battery
I have an office just like this buried under a bunch of stuff.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome, although you can see what you've gotten yourself into.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/27/2004 7:36:22 AM >>>
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>About the only piece of advice you haven't received (and I might as
>well say it before Mark Roberts does... ): Don't believe
>anything I say
We'll have to pay attention on the Aug 32. ;-)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/25/2004 2:14:37 AM >>>
G'day Peedeeemmellers,
Anyone else noticed the trend in Pentax's recent announcements? Just
pulling the days/dates off DPReview gives the last three (macro lenses,
two compacts, another two compacts) a
Didn't Kodak used to own (and maybe still does) Hasselblad?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/24/2004 2:46:25 PM >>>
I like the idea of a camera that will take an optional digital back, as
is
the case with some med format bodies. I'll soon be looking at a
Hasselblad, which seems to offer the best of film a
I didn't say they were bad cameras, just that they never caught. If
they had, Canon and Nikon would have made then too.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/17/2004 11:16:17 AM >>>
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> There are many folks that have enough money to buy a DSLR but reall
I think it's the wrong camera for a hotshoe. It's meant to be compact,
and the external flash would be bigger than the camera. What Pentax
needs is an EVF camera like the Nikon 8700 which is not a DSLR but has
all the fixin's. For many folks (maybe even some of us on the list) a
high end EWVF c
Calumet sells a Pentax body cap with a laser cut pinhole for about $30.
(In case anyone was taking this seriously ;-)
Nice shot. Not very good restaurant, however, if you have to bring your
own dog. 8^O
ld switch to still life. ;-)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 9:17:28 AM >>>
Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> "I did have Chicory coffee and a number of Beignets
> (the best were actually at the airport!)"
>
> I noticed that too when I went to a meeting i
Troublemaker. In this case, however, I happen to agree.
I like it as is.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
I never noticed this, but I never use really small apertures. I'll have
to try this tonight.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/9/2004 5:00:3
Norm's a Texan. He uses a 6x7 'cause it's the biggest damn SLR he can
get.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/8/2004 11:55:20 PM >>>
--- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I did it.
Say it ain't so, Joe...
So, who's left, me and Norm?
-frank
=
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all
I think that most of Sigma's production goes to making the 120-300 zooms
for Canon and Nikon so there's really nothing left for Pentax. Just a
thought.
I must be in some weird why why why mood, but I was also wondering what
kind
of issues stop Sigma from offering it's 120-300 2.8 lens in a Pentax
Nice job Vic. You get this week's gold star!
As always, Adelheid, thanks to you and Jos for all your work.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/7/2004 2:35:08 PM >>>
Hi folks,
I saw this discussion about PUG vs PAW.
I think Bernd put it very nicely, saying that PUG lasts as a gallery
where
you can enjoy the pics and the PAWs are short lived and are gone
As I mentioned elsewhere, the K/M lenses work fine. But the whole
approach, while clever, does smack of "afterthought", which doesn't
exactly inspire confidence in the future. OTOH, who knows what Pentax
thinks? It could simply be that they rushed the *ist D to market as
fast as they could and s
I don't hesitate to use K or M lenses on the *istD. I just bought a K
300. The "green button mode is quick and easy once you do it a few
times.
This is really good news because:
1. We have two nifty new macros. The 100 is only 12 oz! And look at
the size of those focusing rings, as opposed to rubber bands we have
now. The focus clutch should be especially nice for macro work. And
that 50 would make a nice normal lens. I'll be espec
I have a 681B and a 484RC2 miniball head. I also take the ball head off
for long lenses like the K 300 since the whole platform feels more
stable. There are times, though, like a a recent balloon rally, when
the head was important because it allowed my to point the lens upwards
without too much
Actually, I read somewhere that Canon has an AF lens in the 1200 range
that costs 50-70 thousand dollars. I found it on there site, but there
was no price given.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/6/2004 3:09:43 PM >>>
I wouldn't pay $100 a millimeter for ANY lens even a super wide angle!
:)
JCO
-Ori
Ouch.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/6/2004 4:17:19 PM >>>
Shel wrote:
>
>As opposed to assholes with macros taking closeups of bugs and flowers
with
>(D)SLR's that only show a portion of the frame?
>
You can get an a*e with a macro lens now? Cool.
Tom C.
I'm pretty sure Frank is older than that.
Actually considering the point of the post, just thinking of a
photograph as something that takes time to setup could be a valuable
lesson. What camera was it? Not the 67? That thing is bigger than
most 3 year olds.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/5/2004 9:09:
Also, snapshots need all of the pieces of any photograph, e.g.,
exposure, composition, etc., except that the photographer has to achieve
them faster.
I really don't think you should call him "Strange Norm" in public.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/4/2004 2:19:43 PM >>>
Strange Norm's post never got to me...
Caveman wrote:
> Only at 1.4 ... ;-)
>
> Norm Baugher wrote:
>
>> - my 50/1.4 is better than your 50/1.7
>>
>> Caveman wrote:
>>
>>> Well, we
Given the number of abyssmal snapshots in the world, taking good ones
must be considered a distinction. Given the nature of people, what HCB
did was optimised to show human life. The alternative to "snapshots" is
a posed style like Avadon. While I do like Avadon's work (there, I
said it), HCB w
] 8/3/2004 8:45:26 PM >>>
Now THERE's an excuse. Can't decide if it's a good one or not though.
CW
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re:
I think this is probably a fairly accurate assessment. It would have
been useful to talk about the uses of each lens or funny to say
something disparaging about each., The combination gives some funny
lines but also a lot of unsupported opinion. Besides, what's wrong with
a snapshot lens? I tak
Congrats. There is no higher praise than payment.
I remember reading once about possible reasons to put a processor in a
commode. The most intriguing one is that chemical/biological sensors
would effectively give you a lab test whenever you relieved yourself,
and would alert you to any detected medical problems. The obvious
problems involve ste
Does anyone here have a high end Canon or Nikon (like a D2H or a 1D II)?
I suspect that these AF systems are much better and may lead to more of
a "fire and forget" mentality with a little practice. I MF a lot on my
*ist D since I have some A lenses I really like, but when I do use AF I
always us
How about "Hey, I thought you brought the beer".
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/1/2004 12:09:50 AM >>>
Jostein,
Yet another wonderful image. For me, the title doesn't quite fit. I
get a different feeling - one of solitude. The placement of the boat,
catching the oars up and the lighting are all gre
A classic shot. Well composed, exposed, and sharp. You do such nice
work. I especially like the high contrast rendering of the boat and the
couple.
Just out of curiouslity, does the focus hexagon appear when you think
its in focus?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/1/2004 12:37:27 AM >>>
> MF for landscapes, probably
> pre-focussed MF for many sports and full MF for portraits
> too. Gotta get those eyes sharp, sayeth all the masters.
Am I the only
I didn't see the 55 on the list.
Steve (proud owner of a Tak 55 f2)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/30/2004 8:44:35 PM >>>
My first SLR was purchased used in
Scientific American did an article about 3-5 years ago on ways that
engineers and physicians would redesign the human body (if they had been
consulted). A major part of the redesign was the knee, which would have
a greater range and forward motion.
Steve the Trivial
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/27/20
To respond to both you and Ken, I have some with just tractors (I went
back after the event and the tractor were still in the arena) but I
preferred the people shots. This was the antique (old) tractor class,
and there weren't nearly as many spectators as there will be tonight
with the modern tra
Last night at the Rockbridge County Fair:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
This was the the antique tractor pull, and you're looking at some of
the boys watching the competition.
Allow me to aks the ultimate "Mr. Clueless" question. What's it like
doing color LF?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/26/2004 4:12:30 PM >>>
Perhaps they are more gadget/equipment enthusiasts instead of image
enthusiasts?
Bruce
Monday, July 26, 2004, 12:35:59 PM, you wrote:
WR> I still don't understan
Luck! What kind of catalog?
Steve( hoping fo a cheap thrill)
Really nice. I like the composition and I find the DoF to be just about
right. I just got this lens, and so far I really like it on the *istD.
I've had real problems submitting things to PUG. I assume I keep
getting the old submission page and my file is just to going off to some
computer in the Homeland Security Office.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540
Great Shot! The right moment and not distracting backgrounds.
Thank you, Michel. It's too bad he had to win it 6 times to get our
attention . IN truth, my wife is an avid cyclist so she follows
the TdF closely every year. I was just impressed that her could still
ride and drink champagne.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/25/2004 11:47:12 AM >>>
American friends,:
I always enjoyed Ferengi and (especially) the rules of acquisition.
He doesn't have the lobes for it.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/24/2004 1:19:16 PM >>>
Ferengi?
Bruce
Saturday, July 24, 2004, 6:13:55 AM, you wrote:
>> > What you all don't realise is that the Klingons have landed and
are
>> > slowly infiltrating society disguised as Norwegians.
>> >
>> > Pt'aa
Really nice work. I agree with your favorite, even before I read it was
your favorite.
Keep them all. The good ones you want to keep, and the bad ones aren't
worth selling.
Sorry. I don't scroll before 9
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/23/2004 8:09:34 AM >>>
In his former life as a egzotic dancer Steve Desjardins wrote on
23.07.04
14:06:
> It really is a technically fine shot. A little gross, but
technically
> well done. What lens?
FA 100
I just came in and saw this thread. We definitely need some new Pentad
products. While we're here, however, my favorite is "tyromancy", which
is foretelling the future by watching cheese curdle. The grand list of
predictive methods can be found at:
http://phrontistery.50megs.com/divine.html
601 - 700 of 1590 matches
Mail list logo
