Re: Has anyone else been having trouble uploading to flickr?

Larry Colen wrote: >When I got home last night I tried another spin on the mount shasta photo >based on the feedback I got. I tried to upload it, and it didn't work. It is >still not working this morning > >I'm getting an error message about CloudFront attempting to establish a >connection.

RE: Has anyone else been having trouble uploading to flickr?

Yes. I thought it was just me. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Has anyone else been having trouble uploading to flickr?

Yup, not only did I try a smaller version, but I also tried from the web interface rather than lightroom > On Feb 17, 2024, at 10:08 AM, Henk Terhell wrote: > > I have no such problem. Usually there is a delay with full resolution > uploading on Flickr. Perhaps you can try smaller files. >

Re: Has anyone else been having trouble uploading to flickr?

I have no such problem. Usually there is a delay with full resolution uploading on Flickr. Perhaps you can try smaller files. Henk Op 2024-02-17 om 19:02 schreef Larry Colen: When I got home last night I tried another spin on the mount shasta photo based on the feedback I got. I tried to

Has anyone else been having trouble uploading to flickr?

When I got home last night I tried another spin on the mount shasta photo based on the feedback I got. I tried to upload it, and it didn't work. It is still not working this morning I'm getting an error message about CloudFront attempting to establish a connection. -- Larry Colen

Re: Ot : is anyone (else) watching Sisiphus on NEtflix? CAMERA content question

Thanks, Larry In Episode 3 there is a lot more of the camera from multiple sides ..  and yes, must be an FT - not an oversight or accident that the name is blocked :-) Still watching the program -- Episode 6 of 16..  I prefer not to have to read subtitles but the actors are great and

Re: Ot : is anyone (else) watching Sisiphus on NEtflix? CAMERA content question

> On Apr 29, 2022, at 4:11 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > IF you are watching it - what is the camera ? I have only watched two > episodes so don't tell me anything > about what happens in the story -- amusing that they are carefully blocking > the name on the camera which looks like > a

Ot : is anyone (else) watching Sisiphus on NEtflix? CAMERA content question

IF you are watching it - what is the camera ?  I have only watched two episodes so don't tell me anything about what happens in the story --  amusing that they are carefully blocking the name on the camera which looks like a  1970's SLR that /isn't/ a pentax 1000.. I'll start searching on

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

> On Apr 13, 2020, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3. KEH had one in bargain, (or as > anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a "bargain" K-5II > from them, which not only still had the new camera

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

Cool. I miss being able to go out and USE my last "enablement", but I have hopes that someday ... On 4/13/2020 13:09:23, P. J. Alling wrote: So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3.  KEH had one in bargain, (or as anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a &

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun P. J. Alling , 13 Nis 2020 Pzt, 20:10 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > > So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3. KEH had one in bargain, > (or as anyone else would say Ex+,

Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3.  KEH had one in bargain, (or as anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a "bargain" K-5II from them, which not only still had the new camera smell, but had less than 3000 shutter actuations),  condition.  Plus now I'll

Re: Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

I also saw it. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:41 PM mike wilson wrote: > A Leopard kill in a Jakkalsbessie tree near Letaba Camp, Kruger Park. In > deep shadow, very difficult to see, spotted by my daughter. Amazing what > a bit of PP can

Re: Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

Yes, Yesterday. J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:29 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > I saw the post - but could hardly see the animal in the tree.. and I'm kinda > glad.. I don't want to look at bloody things > > ann > >> On 10/8/2018 3:52 PM, mike wilson wrote: >> Looks like Alan

Re: Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

I saw the post - but could hardly see the animal in the tree.. and I'm kinda glad.. I don't want to look at bloody things ann On 10/8/2018 3:52 PM, mike wilson wrote: Looks like Alan is not seeing his original posts. I'm not seeing them or responses. On 08 October 2018 at 20:44 Larry

Re: Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

Looks like Alan is not seeing his original posts. I'm not seeing them or responses. > On 08 October 2018 at 20:44 Larry Colen wrote: > > > Yup, I saw it a couple days ago when Alan posted it. > > > mike wilson wrote on 10/8/18 12:40 PM: > > A Leopard kill in a Jakkalsbessie tree near

Re: Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

Yup, I saw it a couple days ago when Alan posted it. mike wilson wrote on 10/8/18 12:40 PM: A Leopard kill in a Jakkalsbessie tree near Letaba Camp, Kruger Park. In deep shadow, very difficult to see, spotted by my daughter. Amazing what a bit of PP can do,

Anyone else seen this? I didn't.

A Leopard kill in a Jakkalsbessie tree near Letaba Camp, Kruger Park. In deep shadow, very difficult to see, spotted by my daughter. Amazing what a bit of PP can do, https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/44415820054/ K5 & Sigma 170-500 DG @ 500mm Alan C -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

We'll see where this goes, but I think you can set "reply to list" as a default. On 6/2/2017 01:37, P. J. Alling wrote: Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:03:22 -0400 From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty

Re: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

or too small. On 3 June 2017 at 18:27, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > For some reason this is too big for the list? > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:39:51 -

Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

For some reason this is too big for the list? Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:39:51 -0400 From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> To: pdml@pdml.net I'm pretty sure they killed the Q b

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Never looked at the PEN camera's Got the original Q for fun for a nice price which I couldn't resist and since then I'm hooked on the Q. The raw files are perfect, and I'm a real pixel peeper. The little lenses are real gems. My 08 wide zoom on a Q-S1 is as good as my DA12-24 or DA*16-50 on a

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

I'm pretty sure they killed the Q because there was no where to go with it. The sensor was already pushing resolution limits, the form factor was already too small for a decent powered battery to improve performance, as well as being less that optimal for heat management. Pretty much any

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

The 08 is a real gem. LR has a profile for it. allmost a macro wide angle The 06 tele zoom and 01 are also excellent. I had to get three copies of the 02 standard zoom to get a good one. If you put a raynox 150 or 250 in front of the 06 tele you get an excellent tele macro. and if you get a Metx

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Thanks Toine! Actually I had to order the Q/K adapter from B, so I ordered the wide angle too while at it. :-) Now I really look forward to testing it. Jostein Den 2. juni 2017 22.46.24 CEST, skrev Toine : >Yes Q7 and a Q-S1 and all the lenses. You'll want the 08 wide zoom >

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Yes Q7 and a Q-S1 and all the lenses. You'll want the 08 wide zoom Toine On 1 June 2017 at 19:29, Jostein Øksne wrote: > Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other users > here? > Jostein > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

I thought the same thing but was not able to get stacked images that were as good as APS-C work, but I was just getting started with focus stacking when I experimented with it and gave up on the Q quickly. The issues I ran into were that that Q's sensor, even at ISO, if fairly noisy and focus

Re: Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 03:37 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: Anyone else with Q7? > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:01:57 -0400 > From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> > To: Jostein <p...@alu

Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:03:22 -0400 From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> To: Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> Wait, this was a big deal on the list a few years ago. Cotty, ar

Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Once again I failed to reply to the list. Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:58:43 -0400 From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> To: Jostein Øksne <p...@alunfoto.no> Every time I was tempted a

Fwd: Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Anyone else with Q7? Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:01:57 -0400 From: P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> To: Jostein <p...@alunfoto.no> Wow, they've been discontinued in Japan and the US for at last a couple of y

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Mark, Very happy to read your considerations about macro. I had thoughts along similar lines, but actually for extreme macro studio work. Controlling vibration at 4X and beyond can be a pain. A setup that requires less magnification to fill the frame could be a good thing if the image quality

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Depends on camera Mode, I guess. Jostein Den 1. juni 2017 22.13.15 CEST, skrev Larry Colen : > > >Jostein wrote: >> >> >> Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: >>> >>> >>> On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" >>> wrote: What is a Q7?

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

I have the original Q, not the Q7. It's a fun system though I haven't used mine in a long time. Back in the days when I traveled for my job I took the Q kit on the road with me -camera , fisheye, normal zoom and tele-zoom - a small, light but versatile kit. And as an update to the copy of

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Looks nice -- in black and silver, at least. How much? Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Jostein wrote: > Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... > This is it: >

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

On 1/6/17, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed: >Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... >This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital- mirrorless.html Never seen this before. Looks like a neat little camera. Any good? -- Cheers, Cotty

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Jostein wrote: Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Or the seventh quartile of a statistical distribution? To bring that back to photography, how many

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Den 01.06.2017 21.01, skrev Larry: On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Or the seventh quartile of a statistical distribution? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

Oh, right. Not an uplifting first response... This is it: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.uk/en/product/10404/body/overview/digital-mirrorless.html Jostein Den 01.06.2017 20.57, skrev Daniel J. Matyola: What is a Q7? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

You mean they finally made a digital version of my old Minox?

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

On June 1, 2017 11:57:44 AM PDT, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: >What is a Q7? The third quarter of next year. Either that or a really small interchangeable lens camera. > > >Dan Matyola >http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > >On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM,

Re: Anyone else with Q7?

What is a Q7? Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote: > Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other > users here? > Jostein > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.

Anyone else with Q7?

Picked up a Q7 kit today that came at an irresistible price. Any other users here? Jostein -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

I often shoot single trip bracketing mode and LR 5.7 seems to cope, the images are never out of order. On 11 January 2015 at 14:28, Igor PDML-StR pdml...@komkon.org wrote: Larry, Whenever I need to batch-rename files, I am using FastStone Image Viewer. It is free and works well (it does a

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

Rob Studdert wrote: I often shoot single trip bracketing mode and LR 5.7 seems to cope, the images are never out of order. Interesting. I was photographing black belt exams at the dojo today. I didn't do any bracketing but I did do some rapid fire sets, and LR was failing for those as

Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

When I bracket shots, I frequently have problems in Lightroom's sort by capture time in that it will get photos from the same bracket out of order. This can be a nuisance when I'm trying to sort them out by under/nominal/over exposure. I don't know whether this is a case of LR using file

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5? On 10/01/2015 12:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: When I bracket shots, I frequently have problems in Lightroom's sort by capture time in that it will get photos from the same bracket out of order. This can be a nuisance when I'm trying

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

On 10/01/2015 12:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: When I bracket shots, I frequently have problems in Lightroom's sort by capture time in that it will get photos from the same bracket out of order. This can be a nuisance when I'm trying to sort them out by under/nominal/over exposure. I don't know

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: When I roll over my counter, I will get a few shots from the end of the session showing up at the beginning of the session. Is there an easy way, in lightroom, on a mac, to rename a group of files from something like

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

Message - From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5? On 10/01/2015 12:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: When I bracket shots, I frequently have problems in Lightroom's sort by capture time in that it will get photos from

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Billanotherdrunken...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5? On 10/01/2015 12:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: When I bracket shots, I frequently have problems in Lightroom's sort by capture time

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

Thanks Mathew, http://www.robcole.com/Rob/ProductsAndServices/FileRenamerLrPlugin/ Looks like it should do a good job for what I want. I hadn't considered looking at plugins. Unfortunately Jeff Friedl doesn't seem to have one to do what I want. Matthew Hunt wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with sort by capture time in LR 5?

Larry, Whenever I need to batch-rename files, I am using FastStone Image Viewer. It is free and works well (it does a few other batch jobs well). [Occasionally I also use FastStone Photo Resizer, - which is also free. - But that's typically when I need to quickly resize several photos from the

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Might as well argue about whether something is *good* art or not. I like the Peter Lik photo in question. I can see that it would make a really beautiful big print. But it's not unique, and it's not outstanding above all others. There are many images quite as good in the genera. Just go to

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Might as well argue about whether something is *good* art or not. I like the Peter Lik photo in question. I can see that it would make a really beautiful big print. But it's not unique, and it's not outstanding above all others

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

I missed this post the other day. Sean O'Hagan of The Guardian writes a perfect rejoinder to that other -- Jonathan Jones also of The Guardian -- idiot's argument that photography can never be art and Peter Lik proves it.

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On 13/12/14, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: Thanks Christine. Worse things happen at sea. This will push me into getting a proper kitchen at last. Excellent! Suggestion: http://uglyhousephotos.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ phx50skitchennational1957b.jpg -- Cheers,

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

I'd love a kitchen like that, if only because it would mean my house was 10 times the size of this one! B On 14 Dec 2014, at 14:54, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote: On 13/12/14, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: Thanks Christine. Worse things happen at sea. This will push

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

It looks like a kitchen from one of the Case Study House houses for Art Architecture Magazine or some 1950s California prefab houses using industrial materials. Some of them were quite small, 800 - 1000 sq ft to fit on some tiny California building lots. On 12/14/2014 11:17 AM, Bob W-PDML

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

What? You think that there might be manipulation of a market, where every perception, of value, is totally subjective, and there are lots of consumers who's taste is entirely in their mouths? Maybe not even there if you take into account some fine, and very expensive, vintages? Well I

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On Dec 12, 2014, at 1:24 AM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: The turd in a tin is a better work than the photo, and didn't cost millions. The article itself is a turd in type, with its talk about protecting an investment. If the financial value was what mattered the Tate would have

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On 13 Dec 2014, at 18:37, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote: On Dec 12, 2014, at 1:24 AM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: [...] My house looks like a work of modern art since yesterday morning when the kitchen ceiling fell down. Perhaps Nick Serota would like to buy

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Ken - many of yours are much,much better That antelope canyon shot is the one I meant - grossly oversaturated on my monitor.. if you

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On 12/12/2014 2:33 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote: Bob W wrote: My house looks like a work of modern art since yesterday morning when the kitchen ceiling fell down. Perhaps Nick Serota would like to buy it. Doesn't that make your kitchen an 'installation'? Best of luck with the ceiling; I had a

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On 12 Dec 2014, at 07:33, Malcolm Smith rrve...@virginmedia.com wrote: Bob W wrote: My house looks like a work of modern art since yesterday morning when the kitchen ceiling fell down. Perhaps Nick Serota would like to buy it. Doesn't that make your kitchen an 'installation'? Best of

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Frankly, this is so far out of the ordinary that I have a hard time believing there isn't a little market manipulation at play. Say I'm a wealthy individual who already owns a lot of fine art photography. I approach a fine art photographer with a deal. I tell him that I'm willing to offer him the

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Just catching up now... yikes - kitchen ceiling down? Is that rain caused? Of course we only have your say that the ceiling fell down... (you know the next line..) ann On 12/12/2014 18:48, Bob W-PDML wrote: On 12 Dec 2014, at 07:33, Malcolm Smith rrve...@virginmedia.com wrote: Bob W wrote:

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

He has a better marketing team than anyone else for sure. And some competent people who make good quality large prints for him. Some BS that he is not editing his pictures in Photoshop, well he has a team for that. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Attila Boros wrote: He has a better marketing team than anyone else for sure. And some competent people who make good quality large prints for him. Some BS that he is not editing his pictures in Photoshop, well he has a team for that. Actually, it's his showroom salesmen who claim there's

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

:56:46 AM Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Attila Boros wrote: He has a better marketing team than anyone else for sure. And some competent people who make good quality large prints for him. Some BS that he is not editing his pictures in Photoshop, well he has

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Message- From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Attila Boros wrote: He has a better marketing team than anyone else for sure. And some competent people who make good quality large prints for him. Some BS that he

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

. -Original Message- From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Attila Boros wrote: He has a better marketing team than anyone else for sure. And some competent people who make good quality large prints for him. Some BS

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Ken Waller wrote: I don't see what's the fuss about the apparent lack of use of PS in the image. Um, I think it's the apparent *presence* of PS that's causing fuss. According to his bio he's been shooting for 30 years so he's likely shot slide somewhere along the way. The narrow latitude of

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

So you're saying his image must have been run thru PS or some such program ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... Ken

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? Toss up which is more awful - the 6.5 or the color Antelope canyon shot. well after all, this did happen in Las Vegas so... ann On 12/10/2014 16:20, Bruce Walker wrote: ... and sells a photo for a historical 6.5 million dollars as a

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Now that sub prime mortgages and dot.com stocks are know to be bad investments, people have to strike out and find new bubble investments Makes you wonder what crazy thing people will over pay for next - maybe tulip bulbs will make a comeback. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

On 12/11/2014 5:53 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Ken Waller wrote: I don't see what's the fuss about the apparent lack of use of PS in the image. Um, I think it's the apparent *presence* of PS that's causing fuss. According to his bio he's been shooting for 30 years so he's likely shot slide

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Obviously the 6.5 mil is obscene. I'd be proud to call the color image mine. -Original Message- From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? Toss up which is more

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

the 6.5 mil is obscene. I'd be proud to call the color image mine. -Original Message- From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? Toss up which is more awful - the 6.5

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

- Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? Toss up which is more awful - the 6.5 or the color Antelope canyon shot. well after all, this did happen in Las Vegas so... ann On 12/10/2014 16:20, Bruce Walker wrote

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

anyone else ... So I guess the worse photos are the more he gets for them? Toss up which is more awful - the 6.5 or the color Antelope canyon shot. well after all, this did happen in Las Vegas so... ann On 12/10/2014 16:20, Bruce Walker wrote: ... and sells a photo for a historical 6.5

Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

not a million dollar shot. ann On 12/11/2014 21:12, Ken Waller wrote: Obviously the 6.5 mil is obscene. I'd be proud to call the color image mine. -Original Message- From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com Subject: Re: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ... So I guess

RE: OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

Bob W wrote: My house looks like a work of modern art since yesterday morning when the kitchen ceiling fell down. Perhaps Nick Serota would like to buy it. Doesn't that make your kitchen an 'installation'? Best of luck with the ceiling; I had a bedroom ceiling come down in 2009 and that

OT - Peter Lik has a better camera than anyone else ...

... and sells a photo for a historical 6.5 million dollars as a result. https://fstoppers.com/landscapes/what-65-million-dollar-photograph-looks-49113 -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: OT - Anyone else having trouble with TinyURL?

Quoting David Mann dmann...@gmail.com: On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote: It seems that others don't have a problem with TinyURL but I'm still getting a time out. I wonder why I'm being picked on? Perhaps my ISP is blocking it for some reason. Probably just Stephen Conroy

Re: OT - Anyone else having trouble with TinyURL?

On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote: It seems that others don't have a problem with TinyURL but I'm still getting a time out. I wonder why I'm being picked on? Perhaps my ISP is blocking it for some reason. Probably just Stephen Conroy protecting you. It's for your own good!

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

On Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:02 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote: on 2011-10-06 21:36 Brian Walters wrote I'm using the Google Home page (http://www.google.com.au/). I can never remember to use the toolbar. the Google Instant control determines whether it will show search

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

From: Darren Addy First off, I was assuming you were talking about a problem with the Google search page, but now I wonder if you mean the Search box (that can be set to different search engines, in the Firefox browser). Do you have the same problem with another browser (like Opera or Chrome)?

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

From: Brian Walters On Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:49 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: Probably a bug that was introduced in a recent code change. If it is like others that have done similar tricks in the past, the temporary solution is to Disable Instant (search autocomplete):

OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

I type about 15 characters in the Google search box it just loses focus. I have to click in the search box again to get it to let me type the rest of the search term. EG: apropos today's discussions, I wanted to know What is the difference between a spoonerism and a malapropism. But I am

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

Probably a bug that was introduced in a recent code change. If it is like others that have done similar tricks in the past, the temporary solution is to Disable Instant (search autocomplete): http://practicalrambler.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-to-disable-google-instant-no-google.html I hate Instant,

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

From: Darren Addy Probably a bug that was introduced in a recent code change. If it is like others that have done similar tricks in the past, the temporary solution is to Disable Instant (search autocomplete):

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

First off, I was assuming you were talking about a problem with the Google search page, but now I wonder if you mean the Search box (that can be set to different search engines, in the Firefox browser). Do you have the same problem with another browser (like Opera or Chrome)? Firefox 3.6.6 is no

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

On Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:49 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: Probably a bug that was introduced in a recent code change. If it is like others that have done similar tricks in the past, the temporary solution is to Disable Instant (search autocomplete):

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

on 2011-10-06 19:55 Brian Walters wrote Hmmm. I tried that, set Google Preferences to 'Do not use Google Instant', saved and then a 404 Error came up. I tried a Google search anyway and found Google Instant wasn't disabled. Went back to Google Preferences and saw that 'Do not use Google

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

On Thursday, October 06, 2011 9:17 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote: on 2011-10-06 19:55 Brian Walters wrote Hmmm. I tried that, set Google Preferences to 'Do not use Google Instant', saved and then a 404 Error came up. I tried a Google search anyway and found Google Instant

Re: OT: Has anyone else noticed any problems with Google

on 2011-10-06 21:36 Brian Walters wrote I'm using the Google Home page (http://www.google.com.au/). I can never remember to use the toolbar. the Google Instant control determines whether it will show search _results_ dynamically, but you are facing a hang up in the search term suggestions

Question for Mark, Doug, William and anyone else that has judged a photo contest

http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2011-markhamfair/album/index.html In my markham fair post, i mentioned that one of the jays shots, 6037, the landing one, is a bit soft, Paul calls in motion blur.:-) This is the one i like for the wild bird class, but am bothered by this bit of softness, which does

Re: Question for Mark, Doug, William and anyone else that has judged a photo contest

On 9/19/11 10:08 AM, David J Brooks wrote: http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2011-markhamfair/album/index.html In my markham fair post, i mentioned that one of the jays shots, 6037, the landing one, is a bit soft, Paul calls in motion blur.:-) This is the one i like for the wild bird class, but am

Re: Question for Mark, Doug, William and anyone else that has judged a photo contest

due to my connection with a large local camera shot/lab. Jack - Original Message - From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net Cc: Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 7:08 AM Subject: Question for Mark, Doug, William and anyone else that has judged a photo

  1   2   3   >