On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I disagree.
stan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 19/12/2013 3:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
You'll know it's too stupid to debate when I wade in.
/thread
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I disagree.
No you don't!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
Mark - did you pay for the arguement??
ann
On 12/19/2013 17:32, Mark Roberts wrote:
Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I disagree.
No
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:56:41PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I disagree.
You're right, that should be Nobody
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I'm just trying to insert a bit of levity into a weighty situation.
Of course, many photographs are art. Anything by HC-B, and much of
that by AA, for easy examples.
I don't know about that, you saw what happened when one of
On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nothing is to stupid to be debated on this list! G:
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
I disagree.
No you don't!
--
Mark
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
/thread
Heh. Optimist.
Try mentioning the war.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On 19/12/2013 6:10 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
/thread
Heh. Optimist.
Try mentioning the war.
Don't ever mention the war
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I'll never get over Macho Grande!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/12/2013 6:10 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
The topic got passing mention at my weekly nature photography group
brunch today.
A comment was made that it's art when a photograph needs a paragraph
to explain what it's about.
But that got me to thinking. How do you know if it's a photograph that
needs a paragraph or a paragraph that needs a
John wrote:
A comment was made that it's art when a photograph needs a paragraph
to explain what it's about.
The more words there are on a gallery wall next to a picture, the
worse the picture.
- Gustave Flaubert
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
2013 23:23
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: What is photographic art?
I don´t care if my pictures are art or not. It doesn´t make them any better.
DagT
17. des. 2013 kl. 23:03 skrev Walt ldott...@gmail.com:
Of course my photos are art. And so is everything else I do if you leave
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John
The topic got passing mention at my weekly nature photography
group brunch today.
A comment was made that it's art when a photograph needs a
paragraph to explain what it's about.
But that got me to thinking. How do you
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
John wrote:
A comment was made that it's art when a photograph needs a
paragraph
to explain what it's about.
The more words there are on a gallery wall next to a
picture, the worse the picture.
- Gustave Flaubert
Earlier in this thread someone mentioned the example of mobiles: once art,
now the baby-crib attachment to keep ankle-biters occupied.
We watch Antiques Roadshow on PBS. The other evening they had a Calder
miniature mobile, appraised at $1M. My mother-in-law's caregiver (NOT a
sophisticate)
And to finish my thought...
On Dec 18, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Earlier in this thread someone mentioned the example of mobiles: once art,
now the baby-crib attachment to keep ankle-biters occupied.
We watch Antiques Roadshow on PBS. The other evening they had a Calder
Stan Halpin wrote:
And this is why I disagree with the notion that if it takes more words to
describe,
it must be of lower quality. It might also be the case that the public
doesn't
understand that artist's language.
I agree with you on that. So, I think, would Gustave Flaubert, because
I
-Opprinnelig melding- Fra: DagT
Dato: 17. desember 2013 23:23
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: What is photographic art?
I don´t care if my pictures are art or not. It doesn´t make them any better.
DagT
17. des. 2013 kl. 23:03 skrev Walt ldott...@gmail.com:
Of course my photos are art
Of course my photos are art. And so is everything else I do if you leave
it to me to be the judge.
-- Walt
On 12/16/2013 8:45 AM, CollinB wrote:
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art
form.
But popularity, it seems, destroys art. (eg, the mobile went from an
Mine must be because I frame em!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Walt ldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: What is photographic art?
Of course my photos are art. And so is everything else I do if you leave
it to me
I don´t care if my pictures are art or not. It doesn´t make them any better.
DagT
17. des. 2013 kl. 23:03 skrev Walt ldott...@gmail.com:
Of course my photos are art. And so is everything else I do if you leave it
to me to be the judge.
-- Walt
On 12/16/2013 8:45 AM, CollinB wrote:
-Opprinnelig melding-
From: CollinB
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it
remains an art form. But popularity, it seems, destroys art.
Ironically, that seems not to apply to rhetorics. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 16/12/2013 8:58 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
-Opprinnelig melding- From: CollinB
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an
art form. But popularity, it seems, destroys art.
Ironically, that seems not to apply to rhetorics. :-)
Jostein
I'm
CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art
form.
But popularity, it seems, destroys art. (eg, the mobile went from an
art
form to a baby crib toy)
Kodak is to blame for the change in photography and that was about a
century
ago.
Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
From: CollinB
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it
remains an art form. But popularity, it seems, destroys art.
Ironically, that seems not to apply to rhetorics. :-)
grin
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:45:51AM -0500, CollinB wrote:
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art
form.
The only people who are bigger wankers than self proclaimed artists,
are the people who debate about what qualifies as art.
Photos can be used to express
Larry Colen wrote:
The only people who are bigger wankers than self proclaimed artists,
are the people who debate about what qualifies as art.
Have I mentioned lately that the 2013 PDML Quotations List will be out
next week?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:20:11PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
The only people who are bigger wankers than self proclaimed artists,
are the people who debate about what qualifies as art.
Have I mentioned lately that the 2013 PDML Quotations List will be out
next week?
Well you woke up bored, didn't you, Collin? :-D
Cheers,
-M.
Reading too much Feyerabend.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
And some of us don't give a shit, we just like playing with our toys.
If we get pretty pictures in the process, so much the better.
Larry
Nobody said we couldn't have fun.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art
form.
But popularity, it seems, destroys art. (eg, the mobile went from an art
form to a baby crib toy)
Kodak is to blame for the change in
If I think it's art, then it's art ... at least as far as I'm concerned.
Your mileage may vary. Professional driver on a closed course. Do not
try this at home. Standard disclaimers apply.
On 12/16/2013 3:58 PM, Attila Boros wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, CollinB
Quoting Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:45:51AM -0500, CollinB wrote:
When a medium belongs exclusively to the artists then it remains an art
form.
And some of us don't give a shit, we just like playing with our toys.
If we get pretty pictures in the process, so
On 12/16/2013 1:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
The only people who are bigger wankers than self proclaimed artists,
are the people who debate about what qualifies as art.
Have I mentioned lately that the 2013 PDML Quotations List will be out
next week?
So you're saying
I've seen a lot of art where the if the artist was trying to evoke
the feelings of disgust they succeeded admirably, however I don't think
that /I/ would call that art.
On 12/16/2013 3:58 PM, Attila Boros wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
When a
What do you think, Ricoh is Leica? There are only two manufactures
photography that could get away with making such a special purpose
device as a monochrome only digital camera, and only three that might
actually try it. Leica already makes such a beast, and will probably
make a profit on
No, I don't think I would. Too limiting. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you buy it? There would be a lot to gain in resolution and
sensitivity by eliminating the color filter. Big bonuses if you tend
to shoot
On 11/29/2013 9:55 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
And likewise for me as well. Although I work almost entirely in BW,
the conversion tools in ACR and Photoshop have become key elements in
establishing each shot’s tonality. I wouldn’t be willing to give that
up in exchange for whatever resolution
On 11/29/2013 2:55 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 11/29/2013 12:01 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Would you buy it?
No.
Likewise.
And likewise for me as
Some questions for you:
* Assuming you gain sensitivity by using a monochrome sensor, then
you would lose it by placing a coloured filter in front of it.
* So what have you gained in the end? The K-3 already seems to have
plenty of resolution; what will you do with all the extra rez?
* What
On 11/29/2013 12:01 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Would you buy it?
No.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Would I buy it? No.
I'm afraid the market would be too small for such a beast.
But given that
what will you do with all the extra rez?
That is what we BW film people make the most use of.
All that detail on the neg just waiting to be burned in.
It's the texture of
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 11/29/2013 12:01 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Would you buy it?
No.
Likewise.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
In looking at some more examples, it seems that removing the AA filter
offers the most benefit, while removing the CFA offers only marginal
improvements, though there are gains to be had for astrophotographers.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri,
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 11/29/2013 12:01 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Would you buy it?
No.
Likewise.
And likewise for me as well. Although I work almost entirely in BW,
Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you buy it?
Of course not.
One of the benefits of shooting BW film is being able to change
between different films with different spectral responses. Buying a
camera that was BW only would be like locking yourself into, say,
Ilford FP4, and never
Would I buy it? No. For some reason, the notion of an SLR system camera that is
monochrome only does not appeal to me at all.
I do, however, consider the possibility of trading my Leica M9 (and some
frighteningly large chunk of cash) for a Leica M Monochrom, however.
G
--
PDML
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:01:56PM -0500, Zos Xavius wrote:
Would you buy it? There would be a lot to gain in resolution and
sensitivity by eliminating the color filter. Big bonuses if you tend
to shoot in black and white a great deal anyways. I realize the
downsides of having to use filters
originale-
From: Marco Alpert
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 8:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What if Pentax made a monochrome K-3?
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:15 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote
For light room plugins just go to Jeff Freidl's site.
http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:17:45PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All!
I've been using TTG web-plugins in LR for creating web galleries.
http://theturninggate.net
At some point I
on 2013-10-06 22:50 David Mann wrote
On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Been a word for something like two decades, at least in geek communities.
I've known it in that context for a while too, but I haven't found it in any of
our dictionaries. Our Shorter Oxford
LOL. This is one of the funniest things I have read in a long time.
Too bad it is too long for a MARK!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 10/2/2013 4:07:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
s...@stans-photography.info writes:
Tarnation is an oxidization process that affects fine silver. The
Egad, administrivia is really a word???
Marnie aka Doe ;-) Although, when you think about it, it's a very apt word.
In a message dated 10/2/2013 4:14:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
godd...@me.com writes:
administrivia: becoming common shorthand for administrative trivia,
trans.:
here's a
LOL. Okay, another one.
MARK!
Marnie aka Doe :-) These are much better than puns, guys. But not sure
what to call them, made-up definitions?
In a message dated 10/2/2013 4:26:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes:
Portmanteaux is a syndrome suffered by fellows
On 6 Oct 2013, at 08:56, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
LOL. Okay, another one.
MARK!
Marnie aka Doe :-) These are much better than puns, guys. But not sure
what to call them, made-up definitions?
Funny you should ask that, because the correct name for such a word is an
'akado'. The
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Egad, administrivia is really a word???
Been a word for something like two decades, at least in geek communities.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
On 10/6/2013 03:56, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
LOL. Okay, another one.
MARK!
Marnie aka Doe :-) These are much better than puns, guys.
As good as, anyway
Remember this is the Puns Daily Make (us) Laugh list!
ann
But not sure
what to call them, made-up definitions?
In a message dated
Uh huh. Sorry, Bob, you don't get a mark. I mean you've ALWAYS made things
up. Definitions/tall tales. Which by the way, in old English that was
defined as being long-nosed lier. Optional adjective, wooden. Which, BTW,
derives from the word, lyre. Due to the fact it was struck with a
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
eactiv...@aol.com
Uh huh. Sorry, Bob, you don't get a mark. I mean you've
ALWAYS made things up. Definitions/tall tales. Which by the
way, in old English that was defined as being long-nosed
lier. Optional adjective, wooden.
Okay, that's a good one. LOL.
BTW, I wasn't even trying to out piss-artist you. No way, on either side
of the pond, could I succeed.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 10/6/2013 7:47:42 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net]
On Oct 7, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Egad, administrivia is really a word???
Been a word for something like two decades, at least in geek communities.
I've known it in that context for a while too, but I haven't
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:03:01AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Hmmm how did this get from my riff on the Steinberg New Yorker Cover
regarding Cotty once living in California (after someone joked about
his Britness)to a serious discussion of the Hudson
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 07:48:29AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:03:01AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Hmmm how did this get from my riff on the Steinberg New Yorker Cover
regarding Cotty once living in California (after
Hmmm how did this get from my riff on the Steinberg New Yorker Cover
regarding Cotty once living in California (after someone joked about his
Britness)to a serious discussion of the Hudson River? I had hoped I had
released a jolly play-on-words thread.
Oh well
ann
On 10/3/2013 22:43, P.J.
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:03:01AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Hmmm how did this get from my riff on the Steinberg New Yorker Cover
regarding Cotty once living in California (after someone joked about
his Britness)to a serious discussion of the Hudson River? I had
hoped I had released a jolly
On 3 Oct 2013, at 05:49, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 2/10/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I get that when my crappy ipad decides to send something as html.
Hmm. My email app on my Macbook is set to text only.
So is mine, but every now and then when I paste a
On 3 Oct 2013, at 05:50, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 2/10/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty lived for a bit on this side of the big pond - somewhat west of
the Hudson river I believe :-)
There's a river named after Rock Hudson? Cool. ;-)
It flows both
On 3/10/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
So is mine, but every now and then when I paste a link it decides that
it knows better.
Aha
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
on 2013-10-02 16:54 Bruce Walker wrote
Cotty, email list handling software traditionally accepts meta
commands within submitted messages to do things like subscribe,
unsubscribe, list the subscribers, etc. They are usually only
interpreted immediately following a newline. This list has had these
What it probably means is that you inadvertently included something
other than plain text.
On 10/2/2013 4:42 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me
I think Rock pretty much flowed one way, he was just a very good actor.
On 10/3/2013 3:35 AM, Bob W wrote:
On 3 Oct 2013, at 05:50, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 2/10/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty lived for a bit on this side of the big pond - somewhat
On 10/3/2013 3:35 AM, Bob W wrote:
On 3 Oct 2013, at 05:50, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 2/10/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty lived for a bit on this side of the big pond - somewhat west of
the Hudson river I believe :-)
There's a river named after Rock
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On 10/3/2013 3:35 AM, Bob W wrote:
On 3 Oct 2013, at 05:50, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 2/10/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty lived for a bit on this side of the big pond - somewhat
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't think the Hudson River flows south either.
Although, depending on the tides, it probably flows both directions
right at the opening.
not just the opening — in flood tide, it flows
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't think the Hudson River flows south either.
Although, depending on the tides, it probably flows both directions
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:24PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't think the Hudson River flows south
On 10/3/2013 4:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:24PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't
on 2013-10-03 14:43 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:24PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't think
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:23:12PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-10-03 14:43 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:24PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03,
On 3 Oct 2013, at 20:35, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:27 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2013-10-03 13:11 Larry Colen wrote
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't think the Hudson River flows south either.
on 2013-10-03 15:40 Larry Colen wrote
I wonder what the elevation of the river is 140 miles upstream.
mean elevation of Hudson River at Albany is 2 feet above sea level (per a
USGS site via google cache due to government shutdown)
High tides much over, what?, a meter?, are probably a bit
On 3/10/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I wonder what the elevation of the river is 140 miles upstream.
High tides much over, what?, a meter?, are probably a bit unusual,
and tidal effects are probably mostly limited by the elevation
of the river surface, and the high tide level.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:56:14PM +0100, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 3/10/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I wonder what the elevation of the river is 140 miles upstream.
High tides much over, what?, a meter?, are probably a bit unusual,
and tidal effects are probably mostly
The Hudson River is geologically considered to be a fiord so it's pretty
close to sea level. The Connecticut River which geographically isn't a
fiord is tidal to about 30 miles inland.
On 10/3/2013 5:40 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:23:12PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
on
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
I need an adequate definition of tarnation first.
(Seriously, I've always wondered what
On 10/2/2013 3:42 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
My guess is that it's a portmanteau of administrative and trivia.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I need an adequate definition of tarnation first.
There you go: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tarnation
Also, according to my English-Hungarian dictionary it's an
americanism. Why would a fine English
On 10/2/2013 16:49, Mark Roberts wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
I need an adequate definition of tarnation
Well, according to your like, James Joyce used it. I hear he was
passably literate, and certainly not American.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Mark Roberts
On 2 Oct 2013, at 21:49, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
I need an
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, according to your like, James Joyce used it. I hear he was
passably literate, and certainly not American.
I stand corrected. I knew I can't trust this thing too much.
--
Attila
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 2 Oct 2013, at 21:42, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
I get that when my crappy ipad decides
Cotty lived for a bit on this side of the big pond - somewhat west of
the Hudson river I believe :-)
ann
On 10/2/2013 17:04, Attila Boros wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I need an adequate definition of tarnation first.
There you go:
Cotty, email list handling software traditionally accepts meta
commands within submitted messages to do things like subscribe,
unsubscribe, list the subscribers, etc. They are usually only
interpreted immediately following a newline. This list has had these
meta commands disabled AFAICT, but if
Tarnation is an oxidization process that affects fine silver. The effete elite
would probably rather speak of patination, not realizing that patination is not
the acquisition of a patina, but rather the process of acquiring a patent.
stan
On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Steve
On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain 'administriva'.
Can someone please tell me what in tarnation is this?
I need
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:13:16PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed pending review
by Doug - and that my post may contain
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:13:16PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Had an email back from the list saying my post is delayed
On 10/2/13 6:54 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Cotty, email list handling software traditionally accepts meta
commands within submitted messages to do things like subscribe,
unsubscribe, list the subscribers, etc. They are usually only
interpreted immediately following a newline. This list has had
601 - 700 of 5601 matches
Mail list logo
