Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond or
rules and order. In Germany they often have Ph. D´s while in
the US
they often have bachelors degrees in their technical field... .-)
DagT
Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 21.29 skrev Bob W:
Perhaps he
All too true.
Is that what they are called, fast food technicians? Oh, boy.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Don't worry - it's only a matter of time before they become fast food
engineers.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:34:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
If Moon landing deniers are today's flat earth people, what the heck are
these wackos?
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
I don't feel that my academic freedom would be infringed in the
least if he got the boot.
Keith, you wouldn't feel that your academic freedom would be infringed
if a professor were booted without an examination of
Its an elaborate joke. Read the footnote on the main page.
Don
mike wilson wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:34:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
If Moon landing deniers are today's flat earth people, what
Mine was less elaborate. No footnotes. I wouldn't offend people who live that
far North. Not me. No, sir. 8-)
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 09:10:14 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Its an elaborate joke. Read
mike wilson wrote:
Mine was less elaborate. No footnotes. I wouldn't offend people who live
that far North. Not me. No, sir. 8-)
Speaking of elaborate, jokes, and crap, here's one of my favorites:
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
http://www.venganza.org/
--
Thanks,
DougF
21:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
But he was correct. All you need is all the facts and a
powerful enough
computer. Boulders are not capable of self-determination and
follow pure
physical rules. However, if he was applying that to
psychology he
I think that most of our comments, have the unstated but presumed to be
understood proviso If the article is correct. Most of us are talking
generalities and think that if someone is using their teaching position
proselytize their own agenda they should not be supported by the taxpayers.
One
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM machines are
not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without
consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented that
fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that case,
been cleverly
Fri AM 03:34:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
If Moon landing deniers are today's flat earth people, what the heck are
these wackos?
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
They are Alaskans. Over six months
Yeh, around here they get $10/hr while those PHD's working at BK make
only $8. But then, this is a Liberal Arts University town, so there is a
glut of PHD's.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
and stay here reading the PDML.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
At 07:35 AM 27
graywolf wrote:
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM machines are
not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without
consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented that
fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that case,
That is probably true. Another thing is that some patent attorneys
are so good at camouflaging real inventive that they end of with a
PM .-)
DagT
Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 17.24 skrev graywolf:
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM machines
are
not patentable, and any
But some of us have actually met him, and can testify that he is a robot
fueled by beer.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
P. J. Alling wrote:
Hey, what about my Theory that knarf is
Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 17.43 skrev keith_w:
graywolf wrote:
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM
machines are
not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without
consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented that
fall into that category,
Frank:
http://www.sf-radio.net/futurama/bilder/bender.gif
Dave :-)
On 7/28/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But some of us have actually met him, and can testify that he is a robot
fueled by beer.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/28/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But some of us have actually met him, and can testify that he is a robot
fueled by beer.
C'mon Tom,
If someone was going to build a robot, doncha think they'd have built
it better looking and smarter than me?
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Har!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 28 July 2006 15:55
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
I kind of think I have just been insulted by an expert.
--
graywolf
http
Probably because Alaska's closer to Jerusalem on a flat earth.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 28 July 2006 16:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Actually the real
So it seems that your arguments are, to quote someone or
another, Much
Ado About Nothing.
Probably Mark Twain...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:05 PM, frank theriault wrote:
If someone was going to build a robot, doncha think they'd have built
it better looking and smarter than me?
With a good amount of Photoshop, Frank can look passably intelligent.
However, Dave Chang-Sang will always be too bald.
-Aaron
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM
machines are
not patentable, and any
That guy gets some totally ace emails:
http://www.venganza.org/email_neg.htm
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Franklin
Sent: 28 July 2006 13:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
mike
On 7/28/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank:
http://www.sf-radio.net/futurama/bilder/bender.gif
H...
A surprisingly accurate likeness...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM
machines are
not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without
Really? You amaze me.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 28 July 2006 20:51
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 28 July 2006 16:24
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM
machines are
not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected
Of DagT
Sent: 28 July 2006 21:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Not really, I should know. I am a patent attorney and former patent
examiner/clerk in Norway, and a partner here: http://
www.protector.biz/uk/ You´ll find my face somewhere on that cite.
...and just
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 28 July 2006 21:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Not really, I should know. I am a patent attorney and former patent
examiner/clerk in Norway, and a partner here: http
It's all relative you know.
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Talk about crap
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:19:38 +0100
Amazing. I'm astounded that any Swiss patent clerk could
On 7/28/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all relative you know.
You're related to DagT?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 7/28/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all relative you know.
You're related to DagT?
cheers,
frank
As a matter of fact I believe I'm related to both of you. :-)
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
DagT wrote:
...and just to say somethng about the US patent attorneys: They have
law degrees as well, making them very good at handling conflicts.
handling or instigating? :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/28/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a matter of fact I believe I'm related to both of you. :-)
Wow, your answer to my post was, like, at the speed of light!!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No joke, His Noodlelyness has come to me in my dreams.
He awakened my dormant pirate spirit and urged me to take action on
global warming. I am building a ship to sail down river from Chicago
to New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico where I can become a Pirate of
the Caribbean.
Please pass the
HAR! back at you grin.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Bob W wrote:
So it seems that your arguments are, to quote someone or
another, Much
Ado About Nothing.
Probably Mark
:
Really? You amaze me.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 28 July 2006 20:51
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Well, actually the Swiss, and the German, are quite good. Fond
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Sad, but true.
My son quit school and got a job driving an ice cream truck, for money he
couldn't have made for another 5 or 6 *YEARS* following his chosen line of
education and work.
Guess what? He loves
On 26/7/06, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
My son quit school and got a job driving an ice cream truck, for money he
couldn't have made for another 5 or 6 *YEARS* following his chosen line of
education and work.
Have you ever seen 'Thunderbolt and Lightfoot' (1974, Clint Eastwood,
Jeff
On 26/7/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know how true this is, but I have heard that plumbers in England can
pretty much charge whatever they want, some making 1/4 million pounds a
year.
Norwegian plumbers are all off shooting porn
So are the Polish ones.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4115164.stm
Look at the size of his flange!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 27 July 2006 08:35
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Talk about
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 27 July 2006 08:35
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
On 26/7/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know how true this is, but I have heard that
plumbers in England can
pretty much
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/26 Wed PM 11:35:53 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
I expect, no demand, that any education I pay
William Robb wrote:
Sad, but true.
My son quit school and got a job driving an ice cream truck, for money he
couldn't have made for another 5 or 6 *YEARS* following his chosen line of
education and work.
Why is it sad?
Universities have done an excellent job of brainwashing the masses into
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/27 Thu AM 07:55:18 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Talk about crap
I need a warning about pictures like this. I don't want my wife to see it...
DagT
Don't worry. He will be a lousy plumber.
Fra: Bob W
Cotty wrote:
On 26/7/06, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
My son quit school and got a job driving an ice cream truck, for money he
couldn't have made for another 5 or 6 *YEARS* following his chosen line of
education and work.
Have you ever seen 'Thunderbolt and Lightfoot' (1974,
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I think I know why this conversation is confusing me -- in Canada, colleges
and universities are different animals. You go to college for a targeted,
practical education. You go to university to acquire letters to place
behind your name on your resume.
-Aaron
Okay.
On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
His premise is that 9/11 was staged by the US government. He claims
that explosives, not airplanes, brought down the buildings. He's been
on TV and in some newspapers. I suspect he's history. His vision
isn't just different, it's absurd.
On 27/7/06, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you ever seen 'Thunderbolt and Lightfoot' (1974, Clint Eastwood,
Jeff Bridges) ?
;-)
Yes, long ago...
Since I can't recall the theme, it appears it's time to get a copy again and
review it!
Aha, I did a Google search, and NOW I
Cotty wrote:
On 27/7/06, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you ever seen 'Thunderbolt and Lightfoot' (1974, Clint Eastwood,
Jeff Bridges) ?
;-)
Yes, long ago...
Since I can't recall the theme, it appears it's time to get a copy again and
review it!
Aha, I did a Google search,
Actually the biggest bullshit is the assumption that a legislature
doesn't have the right to pull funding from a state university, on the
basis of academic freedom. A legislature can do any damned thing that
they can get a majority to vote for, and frequently proves it. Then
there's the fact
I wouldn't put a lot of credence in the Pentagon having been that well
defended before 9-11. During the cold war the USAF flew combat air
patrols over important installations and had 15min warning ready
fighters on many airstrips. Either of these options was very expensive,
it's expensive to
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:46:06 -0400
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I've read some interesting and compelling arguments for the
fakery of
the moon photographs, but I've read even
He's more advanced than Eliza... more like MegaHAL.
USER: Live and die for Slayer!
MEGAHAL: A COMPUTER CANNOT DIE FOR SLAYER
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Talk about crap
Date: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:20 pm
Size: 584 bytes
To: Pentax-Discuss
Hey, what about my Theory that knarf is an auto reply Eliza program?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Norman Baugher wrote:
From: Tom C
Not to mention that the USSR never doubted it as a fact.
Just as I thought!! The USSR was in on the conspiracy...
Norm
Norm. Yeah, right.
Everyone
I don't have a problem with free speech, I have a problem with 1.)
involuntarily paying for it, (supporting them with tax dollars), and 2.)
Giving them a captive audience. Otherwise people can say anything they
want. It's even easier today, than ever before. Anyone who wants to
spend a few
In a message dated 7/26/2006 2:54:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's for post grad school.
When you're a university freshman, and a couple of levels up from there, you
have to be taught or exposed to truth as we know it. Like all well-learned
subjects, first get
I would. It's a good life. I'm often sorry I passed on it.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I wouldn't hire a lunatic to teach a college course.
Who else would take the job?
;-)
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Talk about crap
I agree with everything you wrote Bob. It's just this guy
should go stand
on a street corner somewhere and preach his crap instead of
getting paid to
do it in an institution of so-called higher learning.
Tom C.
--
When you're worried
Obviously it was a fig newton of your imagination, (and Cotty's as well
I would imagine).
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norm. Yeah, right.
Everyone knows Norm is just a figment of Frank Theriault's
imagination.
Then who called Cotty from GFM
In a message dated 7/26/2006 6:54:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the moment a good tradesman (Electrician, carpenter, welder, fitter
turner etc.) can make more than any university educated fast food technician.
;-)
Dave
==
All too true.
Is that what they are
I'd stay away from that if I were you, far away...
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:06 AM, keith_w wrote:
When I pay for my child to get an education, I do NOT wish that
so-caalled
education to consist of piling bushels of input on him, so he can sort
them
out with his
P. J. Alling wrote:
It's even easier today, than ever before. Anyone who wants to
spend a few bucks a month can start a web site and publish
anything they want.
Witness my latest effort, only just getting off the ground:
http://SurlyDoug.com
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every crackpot who
wishes to tell us about his
Fra: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every crackpot who
wishes to
Otis C. Wright, Jr. wrote:
And it rankles me to hear that academics deserve some special place in
the universe. [...] And, I will always defend a tax payer's
previledge to offer guidance at to how public funds are spent
... especially at the polls.
I'm with you, Otis.
--
Thanks,
DougF
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/26 Wed PM 12:04:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Talk about crap
Fra: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box
Fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/26 Wed PM 12:04:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Talk about crap
Fra: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
I agree Frank. But you have to draw a line somewhere. Academia has to be a bit
selective. An intelligent point of view should be at least a prerequisite.
There's a big difference between someone whose views don't coincide with one's
own and someone who is spouting utter nonsense. Disparate
Hey folks.
Learning comes in many different forms.
Of course you let this idiot teach. Things like this thrive in dark
corners (even on the internet) where they can go unchallenged. In this
case this theory is being aired in a public forum where it can be
challenged. Most people don't read
From: Scott Loveless
On 7/25/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norman Baugher wrote:
From: Tom C
Not to mention that the USSR never doubted it as a fact.
Just as I thought!! The USSR was in on the conspiracy...
Norm
Norm. Yeah, right.
Everyone knows Norm is just a figment
Then you would not object to paying me to teach a course about Perpetual
Motion Engineering at the University of Toronto? Or how about a couse
about how Jackie had Marilyn murdered because John was going to devorce
her and marry Marilyn (which is no where near as far fetched as the 9/11
The real question is why they hired such a nincompoop in the first place.
Having hired him, they should let him say what he likes.
John
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:28:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree Frank. But you have to draw a line somewhere. Academia has to be
a bit selective.
On Jul 26, 2006, at 10:41 AM, graywolf wrote:
Then you would not object to paying me to teach a course about
Perpetual
Motion Engineering at the University of Toronto?
You should see what I'm already paying to have taught at U of T. Sure,
if you're an international expert in the field and
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Hey folks.
Learning comes in many different forms.
Of course you let this idiot teach. Things like this thrive in dark
corners (even on the internet) where they can go unchallenged. In this
case this theory is being aired in a public forum where it can be
On 7/26/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expect, no demand, that any education I pay for is valid and of use...
I hope he's not doing an arts degree then.
:-)
Dave (I don't have any degree ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:06 AM, keith_w wrote:
When I pay for my child to get an education, I do NOT wish that
so-caalled
education to consist of piling bushels of input on him, so he can sort
them
out with his unformed and untested mind.
Would I be starting a crapalanche if I said
In a message dated 7/26/2006 7:44:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about a couse
about how Jackie had Marilyn murdered because John was going to devorce
her and marry Marilyn (which is no where near as far fetched as the 9/11
conspiracy stuff)?
--
graywolf
And, of course, for the maths department you need to hire the resident
loon on sci.math who claims to have a simple proof of Fermat's last
theorem (insert obligatory joke here about the margins of this post
being too small to contain the proof).
There's a reason why the patent department returns
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:06 AM, keith_w wrote:
When I pay for my child to get an education, I do NOT wish that
so-called education to consist of piling bushels of input on him,
so he can sort them out with his unformed and untested mind.
Would I be starting a
There is a movie out called Was it only a paper moon..Look for it on the web.
At 09:06 AM 7/25/06, you wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
Personally, I don't doubt for a minute that men
actually landed on the moon, walked around, drove around, hit golf
balls, etc. But
Sorry, but this is how education works. You can't say believe what I
tell you, Oh untested mind, because I am an expert who knows all while
this other idiot is full of crap. You have to explain why that idiot's
theories are crap. We don't have a big book on the shelf that says
Truth on the
On 7/26/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you would not object to paying me to teach a course about Perpetual
Motion Engineering at the University of Toronto? Or how about a couse
about how Jackie had Marilyn murdered because John was going to devorce
her and marry Marilyn (which is
Your psychology professor must have been a Jansenist.
My linguistics tutor was deaf, which always struck me as probably a
disadvantage for someone in his field. However, now that I too am
practically deaf I've started to revise my opinion.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Our universities are more heavily
But he was correct. All you need is all the facts and a powerful enough
computer. Boulders are not capable of self-determination and follow pure
physical rules. However, if he was applying that to psychology he was an
ass, and you did the correct thing. If you are going to be taught
nonsense,
On 7/26/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your psychology professor must have been a Jansenist. snip
Or a Calvinist.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 26 July 2006 21:18
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Talk about crap
But he was correct. All you need is all the facts and a
powerful enough
computer. Boulders are not capable of self-determination and
follow pure
On 7/26/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he was correct. All you need is all the facts and a powerful enough
computer. Boulders are not capable of self-determination and follow pure
physical rules.
Correct!
However, if he was applying that to psychology he was an
ass,
So I
Darn you Bob! You beat me to it!
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Talk about crap
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:26:16 +0100
I've never done this before, so if I get it wrong, please
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every crackpot who
wishes to
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Sorry, but this is how education works. You can't say believe what I
tell you, Oh untested mind, because I am an expert who knows all while
this other idiot is full of crap. You have to explain why that idiot's
theories are crap.
That's for post grad school.
When
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:37 +0100, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, of course, for the maths department you need to hire the resident
loon on sci.math who claims to have a simple proof of Fermat's last
theorem (insert obligatory joke here about the margins of this post
being too
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
I don't feel that my academic freedom would be infringed in the
least if he got the boot.
Keith, you wouldn't feel that your academic freedom would be infringed
if a professor were booted without an examination of the material or
even a
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 23.49 skrev John Forbes:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:37 +0100, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, of course, for the maths department you need to hire the
resident
loon on sci.math who claims to have a simple proof of Fermat's last
theorem (insert
Keith Whaley wrote:
No, neither are we expected to discern what any given truth is, when our
analyzing skills are so under-developed.
That's what we're in university for. To develop ways ~ tools ~ for
separating
the wheat from the chaff... Ways to tell who the liar is, who the ignorant
one
is.
I saw him on televison Aaron. The claims came from his own mouth. He was
not teaching the class how to discern truth from falsehood.
Tom C.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Talk
And what were they? The article is very vague.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Talk about crap
Date: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:33 pm
Size: 1K
To: pdml@pdml.net
I saw him on televison Aaron. The claims came from his own mouth. He was
not teaching
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
