Re: Enablement

Yeah, well *IF* I could afford it, I wouldn't have mentioned it to you guys until AFTER I bought it ... like I did when the FA-600 f/4 popped up - which I also couldn't *really* afford, but it only took 2 years to pay off. On 2/19/2023 12:13 AM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 18, 2023, at

Re: Enablement

> On Feb 18, 2023, at 8:06 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > > FWIW, IF anyone is interested, KEH currently has a Pentax 400mm F/2.8 SMC A* > ED IF Manual Focus Lens on offer. $3522.44 https://www.keh.com/shop/pentax-smc-p-a-400mm-f2-8-ed-if-telephoto-lens.html > > I lusted after this lens many

Re: Enablement

FWIW, IF anyone is interested, KEH currently has a Pentax 400mm F/2.8 SMC A* ED IF Manual Focus Lens on offer. I lusted after this lens many years ago. I wish Pentax could offer something similar in an AF lens for full-frame. I probably couldn't afford it if they did. On 2/18/2023 4:36 PM,

Re: Enablement

On 2/18/2023 2:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 18, 2023, at 12:30 PM, Bill wrote: That's not something I'm well known for, but I'll try real hard. We'll settle for technically excellent crap. That's more what I'm known for... bill -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe

Re: Enablement

MARK!  oh wait... BRUCE! ann On 2/18/2023 3:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 18, 2023, at 12:30 PM, Bill wrote: That's not something I'm well known for, but I'll try real hard. We'll settle for technically excellent crap. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood --

Re: Enablement

> On Feb 18, 2023, at 12:30 PM, Bill wrote: > > That's not something I'm well known for, but I'll try real hard. We'll settle for technically excellent crap. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Enablement

That's not something I'm well known for, but I'll try real hard. bill On 2/18/2023 2:21 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: Sounds great! We will anticipate some wonderful images. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Sat, Feb 18, 2023

Re: Enablement

Sounds great! We will anticipate some wonderful images. Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:08 PM Bill wrote: > My poor old Fuji gear has been sitting bereft and alone ever since I > bought my K1 in 2016. >

Enablement

My poor old Fuji gear has been sitting bereft and alone ever since I bought my K1 in 2016. Unused, unloved, nearly forgotten, it sad in it's Domke bag with ever increasing amounts of dust collecting on top. Today I changed all that. My old XT-1 body has been supplanted by a spiffy new XT-5

Re: Enablement! New Monitor!

Yes, it's a very nice monitor. On 7/20/2021 3:17 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: Am 20.07.21 um 19:45 schrieb P. J. Alling: It's a Philips 276E9QDSB/27, 124% RGB, wide viewing angles, plug and play on Windows 7. What a difference a screen makes... :-) Had the same experience last year. Ralf

Re: Enablement! New Monitor!

Am 20.07.21 um 19:45 schrieb P. J. Alling: It's a Philips 276E9QDSB/27, 124% RGB, wide viewing angles, plug and play on Windows 7. What a difference a screen makes... :-) Had the same experience last year. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog :

Enablement! New Monitor!

It's a Philips 276E9QDSB/27, 124% RGB, wide viewing angles, plug and play on Windows 7. So far I've been quite pleased.  There were some reviews that intimated that proper drivers were a problem, but so far no problems.  I'll know better when I run my spyder which has decided to make like

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

Alan is correct about my K5. I also have no complaints about the AF. One thing that I have done with each of my camera purchases (Super Program, istD, K10D, K20D, K7, K5, a K50 for my daughter and a K70 for my wife) is waiting to order until at least a year after introduction, so that most of

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

Lovely image! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:29 AM David Mann wrote: > It's been a long time since I bought anything photographic but I recently > found a used K5ii at a reasonable price, and it arrived

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

It is what Mike Johnston, and I seldom agree with Mike Johnston, would call a camera at the point of "sufficiency".   Which is one of the things that are killing the Photo equipment manufacturing industry.  It's got more resolution than most people need, more dynamic range than most people

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

On 3/15/2021 8:06 AM, Alan C wrote: My K5 (ex Mark Cassino) is just great & hasn't given any problems. I'm sure Rick Womer feels the same. No buttons have fallen off & the AF is excellent. However, I believe there were some dicey K5's sold at the end of the Hoya era. Sure, I hear that a lot

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

My K5 (ex Mark Cassino) is just great & hasn't given any problems. I'm sure Rick Womer feels the same. No buttons have fallen off & the AF is excellent. However, I believe there were some dicey K5's sold at the end of the Hoya era. Alan C On 15-Mar-21 03:53 PM, Bill wrote: The K5II is what

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

The K5II is what the K5 should have been, had there been adults in the room. It seems to have solved all of the niggly K5 problems that were not resolved during production, such as buttons falling off and the AF being as reliable as a 10 year old Skoda. It is a big jump from the K10, enjoy it.

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

> On Mar 15, 2021, at 12:28 AM, David Mann wrote: > > It's been a long time since I bought anything photographic but I recently > found a used K5ii at a reasonable price, and it arrived today. This is a big > upgrade from my K10D. yes, the K-5 was the first Pentax body that I owned which I

Enablement (and PESO)

It's been a long time since I bought anything photographic but I recently found a used K5ii at a reasonable price, and it arrived today. This is a big upgrade from my K10D. I went outside and took a couple of photos just after my daughter went to bed but the light was getting a bit low. No

PESO -- Circular Waterfall 2021 & an enablement.

I guess this is kind of and enablement post as well as a PESO. Ever since the destruction of my funky, 60's vintage Sigma* 12mm semi circular fish eye, which was pretty much a full frame fisheye on APS-C digital, I've been on the lookout for a good deal on a fisheye lens to use on my K-3 and K

Re: Enablement!

; & an f/3.5 - f/4, but I think they're both really f/4. I don't know which >> "version" I have. >> >> It was part of a deal where I got the 10-20mm, a 35mm f/1.4 and the "Bigma" >> all used for $1K. >> >> It's a VERY wide angl

Re: Enablement!

de angle of view at 10mm (110° IIRC). On 12/2/2020 17:37:42, P. J. Alling wrote: Fun fact, Thunderbird wants to correct Enablement to Enfeeblement, could be more right than I want to admit. Back to my original point.  I just received my "new", refurbished actually, Sigma 10-20mm f3.

Re: Enablement!

On 12/2/2020 17:37:42, P. J. Alling wrote: Fun fact, Thunderbird wants to correct Enablement to Enfeeblement, could be more right than I want to admit. PS: You don't want to know what Thunderbird thinks some of the names on this list should be. -- Science - Questions we may never find

Re: Enablement!

It's a VERY wide angle of view at 10mm (110° IIRC). On 12/2/2020 17:37:42, P. J. Alling wrote: Fun fact, Thunderbird wants to correct Enablement to Enfeeblement, could be more right than I want to admit. Back to my original point.  I just received my "new", refurbished actually, Sig

Re: Enablement!

Am 02.12.20 um 23:37 schrieb P. J. Alling: Back to my original point.  I just received my "new", refurbished actually, Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 from KEH.com I have the slightly slower version for a number of years and I'm still quite fond of it. Coincidentally, I've just posted a photo taken with

Enablement!

Fun fact, Thunderbird wants to correct Enablement to Enfeeblement, could be more right than I want to admit. Back to my original point.  I just received my "new", refurbished actually, Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 from KEH.com along with a Pentax silver (MZ/ZX), strap, with snap pockets, whic

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

Thank you Rick. On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:53:05 -0400 Rick Womer wrote: > Subash, these are lovely. I particularly like the combination of > colors and the compostion of the common pierrot photo. > > Rick > > > On Aug 22, 2020, at 7:47 AM, Subash Jeyan > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

tion from such trips: > > https://something-feathered.in/2020/08/22/bugs-butterflies-and-a-bike/ > > all the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. > > the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 royal enfield > thunderbird 500cc, bought second-hand. it is

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

thank you Dan. On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:38:14 -0400 "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: > Very nicely done, Subash, especially with the butterfly images! > I wish we had that much variety here. > > Dan Matyola > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 7:50 AM Subash Jeyan > wrote: > >

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

thank you Alan. with a 100mm you have to get fairly close but then shooting with a 24mp camera gives you a lot of leeway in terms of cropping. do you have any links to the footprints team's sojourn in india? looks interesting. On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:28:15 +0200 Alan C wrote: > Interesting

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

thank you Ann. hope you are keeping well... On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:15:36 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: > always a pleasure to view your captures in the wild.. paticularly > like the common pierrot > Glad you are able to get out and about to do this kind of shooting > > ann > > On 8/22/2020 7:47

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

thank you Henk. it's the first time i am shooting butterflies/dragonflies with a 100mm. until now, i have used the DA 50-200 or the 55-300. still getting used to it... On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:16:30 +0200 Henk Terhell wrote: > Subash, nice series of butterflies and dragonflies! > Great to see

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

://something-feathered.in/2020/08/22/bugs-butterflies-and-a-bike/ all the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 royal enfield thunderbird 500cc, bought second-hand. it is not all that powerful but it's got plenty of torque available

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

birding/butterflying...this is a small collection from such trips: https://something-feathered.in/2020/08/22/bugs-butterflies-and-a-bike/ all the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 royal enfield thunderbird 500cc, bought second

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

to go out birding/butterflying...this is a > small collection from such trips: > > https://something-feathered.in/2020/08/22/bugs-butterflies-and-a-bike/ > > all the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. > > the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 ro

Re: GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

ll the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 royal enfield thunderbird 500cc, bought second-hand. it is not all that powerful but it's got plenty of torque available at a relatively lower rpm and that's what is needed for a rid

GESO: bugs, butterflies and a bike.... and an enablement

to go out birding/butterflying...this is a small collection from such trips: https://something-feathered.in/2020/08/22/bugs-butterflies-and-a-bike/ all the photos have been taken with the k3ii and the FA100/3.5. the enablement is not photo-related. it is a 2013 royal enfield thunderbird 500cc

Major enablement

It doesn't always have to be new cameras or lenses. Just got myself a new monitor, an EIZO CS2420, and boy am I happy with it. My old one, also an EIZO, had almost 16,000 hours on its counter and it was high time to get a replacement. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

> On Apr 13, 2020, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3. KEH had one in bargain, (or as > anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a "bargain" K-5II > from them, which not only still had the new camera smell, but had less than >

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

Cool. I miss being able to go out and USE my last "enablement", but I have hopes that someday ... On 4/13/2020 13:09:23, P. J. Alling wrote: So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3.  KEH had one in bargain, (or as anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a &

Re: Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

Happy playing with that I ilke my K3 so much because it cured my DSLR-acquision-syndrome. Let's if it will help you in that regard. Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/

Enablement, (does anyone else miss these threads...)

So I've finally pulled the trigger on a K-3.  KEH had one in bargain, (or as anyone else would say Ex+, and I say this on having bought a "bargain" K-5II from them, which not only still had the new camera smell, but had less than 3000 shutter actuations),  condition.  Plus now I'll no longer

enablement and a PESO

i've just bought a new-old tokina 400/5.6 at-x sd af in exc+++ condition from ebay japan. i have of course read reviews on the net (Mark Cassino's note on the lens with the k3 was particularly helpful and encouraging). it has a reputation for sharpness and also CA in high contrast situations,

Re: enablement

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 12:49:24 -0400 "P. J. Alling" wrote: > that was instructive. i don't think i'll have the stomach for it... > I wouldn't say I've had bad luck with the lens, anyone who's seen my >

Re: enablement

I wouldn't say I've had bad luck with the lens, anyone who's seen my equipment knows I don't baby it, (though in the case of the 70-210mm my current version looks very nice, I've been a lot more careful with it), the biggest problem is a lot of parts are now made of unobtainum, and while the

Re: enablement

com/kennethwaller > > - Original Message - > From: "Subash Jeyan" > Subject: enablement > > > > i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be two > > weeks before i get my hands on it. the reviews of the lens on the PF > > wer

Re: enablement

Yes, i saw that shot in the PPG too... i guess i'll be shooting quite a lot when i get it because it is a "new" lens but i'll decide nearer to the trek whether i should take it or the 55-300. expecting to do some birding on the trek so i suspect it'll be the 55-300. thanks for your inputs, Igor.

Re: enablement

i sure hope i have better luck with the lens than you've had. it didn't cost much so, fingers crossed, i think it's a bargain on the whole... On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:20:38 -0400 "P. J. Alling" wrote: > I've owned three of them, the biggest problem is they are getting > old, first sold with the

Re: enablement

thanks Alan. because i expect to do some birding too, i think i'll take the 55-300. but i look forward to the lens nevertheless. On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 20:05:20 +0200 Alan C wrote: > Subash, I still have one from film days & I must say it's pretty > good. However, I prefer my HD 55-300  (greater

Re: enablement

I've owned three of them, the biggest problem is they are getting old, first sold with the SF series bodies, (1984ish), first "successful" Pentax auto focus system. There are a number of points of failure that become more likely as the lens ages.   \ The problem is that the replacement

Re: enablement

the polarizer after focusing. Actually I counted 48 of the total 84 images were mine. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Subash Jeyan" Subject: enablement i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be

Re: enablement

Subash, I still have one from film days & I must say it's pretty good. However, I prefer my HD 55-300  (greater range & even better) so my poor F 70-210 hardly sees the light of day. Alan C. On 02-Oct-18 04:42 PM, Subash Jeyan wrote: i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd

Re: enablement

Subash, I also have that lens. I've purchased it some 15 years ago, while looking for a better tele-zoom, to replace my Tamron 70-300, while still being on a limited budget. I bought it from eBay for a bit higher than I should have, but it was a moment when they seemed to have been

Re: enablement

The 55-300 would have, also, been a great companion and with more reach on both ends. I've, also, heard the cry that one cannot have too many lenses. J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: > > i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be

enablement

i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be two weeks before i get my hands on it. the reviews of the lens on the PF were pretty good and i was curious about the images taken with the lens. so i went to PPG to have a look. most of the images for that lens in PPG seems to have

Re: Enablement (thanks to the Theta SC price drop)

I somehow missed the earlier announcement of an upcoming Theta 4K, which will be introduced sometime this year. If I like what I can do with the SC, it sounds like the 4K is the one that will produce good video and would be the one I would potentially upgrade to instead of the S model.

Enablement (thanks to the Theta SC price drop)

Hadn't really seriously looked at the Theta until this: Price drop info http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ricoh-announces-199-price-for-theta-sc-360-camera-300479364.html Decided for this price that I should dip my toe in the waters of 360 degree video (particularly since I can hang it

OT: Alternative enablement

Made a couple of boss-approved purchases yesterday that I will be using for work (non-Pentax, thus the OT) The first is the DJI Mavic Pro, a compact drone with 4K video capability. For anyone interested, or considering such a thing, this This guy may seem annoying at first, but he’s pretty funny

RE: Enablement

P. J. Alling wrote: Well if what you need is better high ISO capability, they I can't argue with that. I'm just pointing out that it's not particularly compact compared to it's two immediate predecessors, but all the reviewers and Ricoh itself seem to be making a big deal over it. The K-3 took

Re: Enablement

Well if what you need is better high ISO capability, they I can't argue with that. I'm just pointing out that it's not particularly compact compared to it's two immediate predecessors, but all the reviewers and Ricoh itself seem to be making a big deal over it. The K-3 took a pretty big hit

RE: Enablement

P. J. Alling wrote: Alright in the first two paragraphs I already have issues with this review. First there are the incorrect terms, the reviewer confused mechanical with manual (as in "manual shutter"), then there's the size issue. The reviewer talks about it's compact size. Well go to Camera

Re: K-1 Enablement

There is a difference between wanting a new camera and needing one. If I bought a new camera only when I needed one, I'd probably still be shooting with the K10D. If we all did that, Pentax - and most every other manufacturer other than Canon & Nikon - would be out of business by now. On

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/24/2017 2:13 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: I find it's a Really Bad Idea to keep these vintage computing anecdotes in mind, though. All that does is hamper you when you are deciding how to accomplish many computing tasks. If you keep on thinking that 400 megabytes is enormous, you will miss

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/24/2017 1:56 PM, Gonz wrote: In the 80's, a company I worked for had the big room with raised floors for all the computing equipment. One day, after we had been chronically short on disk space, a huge box came in. It was a washing machine sized disk drive from Fujitsu, that came with the

Re: K-1 Enablement

And you could have sold it to one of the many folks keeping old PDP-11's alive these days. They really were art. They were hand-stitched and really cool looking objects. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Gonz wrote: > Haha, when they dismantled a PDP-11 with 8K core at

Re: K-1 Enablement

Haha, when they dismantled a PDP-11 with 8K core at school, I was thinking: hmm I should take this core memory and keep it as a memento, but alas, I did not. Now I wish I had. It was art. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > I find it's a Really Bad

Re: K-1 Enablement

I find it's a Really Bad Idea to keep these vintage computing anecdotes in mind, though. All that does is hamper you when you are deciding how to accomplish many computing tasks. If you keep on thinking that 400 megabytes is enormous, you will miss opportunities like stacking multiple images. I

Re: K-1 Enablement

In the 80's, a company I worked for had the big room with raised floors for all the computing equipment. One day, after we had been chronically short on disk space, a huge box came in. It was a washing machine sized disk drive from Fujitsu, that came with the whopping capacity of 400Mbytes. We

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/24/2017 8:36 AM, Mark C wrote: I did the upgrade to 32 gb / 8 cores / SSD last year, so I should be prepared. I use Zerene Stacker for larger stacks and it is more efficient with memory than is PS, though I usually combine multiple ZS stacks in PS. I'm sure things will feel a bit more

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/23/2017 6:33 PM, Bill wrote: I've been doing a lot of focus stacked macros with pixel shift. The level of detail goes up quite a bit, and blown out reds seem to be a thing of the past as well. The only downside is that a couple of dozen K1 pixel shift files stacked up in Photoshop take

Re: K-1 Enablement

Glad to hear about the weight - it was one concern that I had, seems like a lot to lug around while traveling etc. For a general purpose zoom in situations where I don't want to carry a second lens I prefer the extra reach that the 28-105 gives. Mark On 2/23/2017 5:48 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/22/2017 11:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Congratulations. The K-1 is a nice piece of kit, and I look forward to seeing what it can do in your hands. Although, I can't help but wonder if you'd be able to do more with your macros using the new K-p, the sample photos I saw showed it giving

Re: K-1 Enablement

That should read Series 1 90/2.5 macro Paul via phone > On Feb 23, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I really liked my Vivitar Series 2 90/2.5 macro. It was a heavy metal lens, > the first version of this iconic lens. Wonderful bokeh and very sharp. Still >

Re: K-1 Enablement

I really liked my Vivitar Series 2 90/2.5 macro. It was a heavy metal lens, the first version of this iconic lens. Wonderful bokeh and very sharp. Still bummed that it's gone. Paul via phone > On Feb 23, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Yep. I bought one at B

Re: K-1 Enablement

Yep. I bought one at B Found a slightly used one on eBay for $420, but decided it wasn't worth the risk, and opted to pay $539 at B No shipping, no sales tax collected. Paul via phone > On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> I

Re: K-1 Enablement

Paul Stenquist wrote: I think I want the 100/2.8 as well. Good reviews. The tamron 90/2.8 is a very nice lens, but I wanted WR because I do a lot of my macro work outside, and it is often a bit damp outside. The Pentax 100 does seem to be just a dab more fairy dust than the Tamron 90, and

Re: K-1 Enablement

I think I want the 100/2.8 as well. Good reviews. Paul via phone > On Feb 23, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> Bill, what macro lens do you use? I was happy with my 90/2.5 Vivitar for >> many years, but I think it was stolen by a

Re: K-1 Enablement

Paul Stenquist wrote: Bill, what macro lens do you use? I was happy with my 90/2.5 Vivitar for many years, but I think it was stolen by a painter who worked here last year. I need a new macro. I've got a Tamron 90/2.8 272E that I need to put up for sale. I found a too good to resist offer

Re: K-1 Enablement

Bill, what macro lens do you use? I was happy with my 90/2.5 Vivitar for many years, but I think it was stolen by a painter who worked here last year. I need a new macro. Paul via phone > On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Bill wrote: > >> On 2/23/2017 12:48 PM, Mark C

Re: K-1 Enablement

On 2/23/2017 12:48 PM, Mark C wrote: I've been doing some macros lately using continuous lighting and am hoping that doing them in Pixel Shift mode would make a difference, though the level of detail is already pretty good. I have to say that for macros some of the benefits of a full frame

Re: K-1 Enablement

Mark, good choice. I got mine with the 28-105 a week ago and am still very much in the learning curve. I was a bit worried about the size and weight of the K-1 when walking around, but so far this is acceptable. Now I'm trying my old prime lenses, but the 28-205 is also fine. Henk Op

Re: K-1 Enablement

Awesome Mark. I only beat you by a few days. I love it so far. The flexibility and configurability is overwhelming. I've never had aperture-bracketing before (unless I never read my previous manuals thoroughly!), which sounds interesting. The AF and image quality so far exceeds my

Re: K-1 Enablement

Looking forward to getting my hands on it tomorrow. I also want to test the Tokina ATX 400 f5.6. Its proven to be a good performer on APS-C bodies, we'll see WRT full frame. On 2/22/2017 4:51 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Congratulations. I love that camera. I think Len has been using his with

Re: K-1 Enablement

Thanks Mark. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net> Subject: Re: K-1 Enablement I've been doing some macros lately using continuous lighting and am hoping that doing them in Pixel

Re: K-1 Enablement

expect of the K-1 over the K-3? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net> Subject: K-1 Enablement I finally bit the bullet and put in an order for a K-1 today. I went with the 28-105 lens

Re: Enablement

That should read "the one for the K-3 will not fit." Oh well I get excited, but not about the new camera. On 2/23/2017 11:01 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: Alright in the first two paragraphs I already have issues with this review. First there are the incorrect terms, the reviewer confused

Re: Enablement

Alright in the first two paragraphs I already have issues with this review. First there are the incorrect terms, the reviewer confused mechanical with manual (as in "manual shutter"), then there's the size issue. The reviewer talks about it's compact size. Well go to Camera size and

RE: Enablement KP

Following up my earlier reply, they are obviously already ready to go, as I've just received a parcel tracking number! Malcolm Larry Colen wrote: Just after I posted this reply I ran across this review: http://www.mycameratravels.com/pentax-kp-hands-on-experience-review/

Re: K-1 Enablement

togallery.com/kennethwaller > > - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net> > Subject: K-1 Enablement > > >> I finally bit the bullet and put in an order for a K-1 today. I went with >> the 28-105 lens since the 24-70 overlaps so much with t

RE: Enablement

Larry Colen wrote: Just after I posted this reply I ran across this review: http://www.mycameratravels.com/pentax-kp-hands-on-experience-review/ Thanks Larry, I'd not seen that review. More from me on this, hopefully around the start of March. Malcolm --

Re: Enablement

Just after I posted this reply I ran across this review: http://www.mycameratravels.com/pentax-kp-hands-on-experience-review/ Larry Colen wrote: Malcolm Smith wrote: In the hope this one finally gets through, I've seen few posts about the KP. The project I'm trying to work on involves

Re: Enablement

Malcolm Smith wrote: In the hope this one finally gets through, I've seen few posts about the KP. The project I'm trying to work on involves me going out at dusk in low light (an ongoing urban fox project), and whilst I don't expect any of the really high ISO images to be useful, I was

Re: K-1 Enablement

Mark C wrote: I finally bit the bullet and put in an order for a K-1 today. I went with the 28-105 lens since the 24-70 overlaps so much with the Tamron 28-75 that I already have. I'm looking forward to seeing how the K-1 performs with some old film era lenses - the FA 50 f1.7, F28 f2.8, A*

Re: K-1 Enablement

Hey, cool it man. I haven't progressed to the K5 yet, let alone a K3 or a K1. Mark's old K7 is still doing OK. Alan C -Original Message- From: Ken Waller Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:19 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-1 Enablement Sounds good Mark, but I

Re: K-1 Enablement

t; Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: K-1 Enablement > > >> I meant to say, I think Ken has been using his with the A* 200 macro. >> >> Paul via ph

Re: K-1 Enablement

I meant to say, I think Ken has been using his with the A* 200 macro I use my A*200 on a K-3, I don't have a K-1. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@mac.com> Subject: Re: K-1 Enabl

Re: K-1 Enablement

Sounds good Mark, but I wonder what advantages do you expect of the K-1 over the K-3? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net> Subject: K-1 Enablement I finally bit the bullet and

Re: Enablement

On 22/2/17, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed: >The project I'm trying to work on involves me going out at dusk in low light >(an ongoing urban fox project), and whilst I don't expect any of the really >high ISO images to be useful, I was surprised at how good sample photos have

Re: K-1 Enablement

The only issue I have with my Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art lens is the K1 automatically sets the field of view to crop mode. I just leave the camera on the full frame setting. Philip Northeast www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au On 23/2/17 7:59 am, Mark C wrote: I finally bit the bullet and put in an

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >