On Sep 22, 2005, at 6:42 PM, John Celio wrote:
The only paper I ever use these days is Epson Premium Lustre. It
is by far the best paper I've ever used. I use it in both the
Epson 9600 and 2200 printers at work.
I've heard a lot of good things said about that paper. I'd try if it
were
the DSLR.
I wouldn't recommend any less than 200ppi unless you're printing
something to be viewed from afar.
Normally I use 360ppi for printing: for inkjet printers I've seen
recommendations that for best results you should print at a whole
fraction of the dpi rating (in my case 360 is 1/4
pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: printing papers ...
My old Epson 1270 is beginning to drive me a little batty: it
occasionally takes to drooling ink from the heads now and then takes 4-5
head cleaning passes and about ten sheets of paper passed through
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: printing papers ...
My favourite setup for printing though is my Epson C86 printing Black Only
onto Moab Kayenta. Just wish it was 300gsm paper instead of 190. Very cold
whites, very rich and warm blacks. I use the Epson ink, although I hear
I print with an Epson 2200 and am very satisfied. In several years and
over 600 13 x 19 prints, I've never experienced a drip or a clogged
head. The 2400 is the latest version of this printer. I'll upgrade when
my 2200 begins to show signs of wear. Maybe sooner. My favorite matte
paper is
Thanks, gang ... I didn't even think about rezzing up. Certainly worth a
try to see what kind of quality can be had. It's also nice to know that,
with digi, a lower rez (200ppi v 330ppi) may give good results. I see a
batch of test prints in my future LOL
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
Whenever I have prints made on the Lightjet or the Frontier, I use 300ppi
to 330ppi or so for the resolution (is that the term?) which gives me a
nice, big, richly detailed print from scanned negatives. Using the same
resolution with the DS results in a much smaller print size, on the order
of
Shel - It seems to vary depending on the service provider and the
enlargement software they'll use on your files (something like Genuine
Fractals).
For example, PixelOutpost.com (specializing in large format prints)
indicates that a meager 3MP image is sufficient for creating a 22x28 inch
print;
. I've been concentrating on
printing to consumer grade inkjet printers (Epson 1140, 1270 and HP
7960 specifically) and optimizing print setup for them specifically.
All of these are rated as 1440x1440 dpi capable printers.
In my experience, any output density over 360 ppi does not produce
you're using
as well as the quality of the driver. I've been concentrating on
printing to consumer grade inkjet printers (Epson 1140, 1270 and HP
7960 specifically) and optimizing print setup for them specifically.
All of these are rated as 1440x1440 dpi capable printers.
In my
On 21/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can get are
small prints using the recommended ppi from the digi, well, that's an
unhappy circumstance. But it seems that many of you are getting larger
than 6x9 prints from the
, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:04 AM
Subject: PPI for Printing
Whenever I have prints made on the Lightjet or the Frontier, I use 300ppi
to 330ppi or so for the resolution
Try up-sizing them in Photoshop, the new Bicubic, Smoother seems to
work about as well as the expensive add ons do. For inkjet prints I
find anything over 200ppi works fine, below that I see a loss of
quality. I have not had any outsourced prints done so can not address
that issue.
graywolf
But do the upsize interpolation in the RAW conversion process. If you
have to do it later, use Bicubic Smoother.
Paul
On Sep 21, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 21/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can get
are
Subject: Re: PPI for Printing
In my experience, any output density over 360 ppi does not produce any
noticeable improvement, and between 200 and 360 ppi the improvements are
very fine *with digital capture images*. For larger scale prints, I've
gone as low as 150ppi with excellent results
Those of you with the HP 7960 series printer ... Have any of you
experimented with other than HP papers?
I'm not particularly fond of glossy surface and have been looking for
a good matte paper. HP's matte surface is more of a semi-matte ...
kinda speckly. Epson Enhanced Matte and
Yes its Adorama.
I have used Adorama their Matte printing is excellent. Even BW is good.
Now they have 25% discount on all prints. I am planning to submit 100s of
prints this wek..:-)
bye
Ramesh
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss
The magazine I work for these days, Digital Camera Magazine, wants to
do a roundup and comparison article on the on-line printing services.
I'm not writing it, but I offered to help the writer by getting some
opinions.
I'd appreciate feedback from people who have used such services
@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 3:59 AM
Subject: On-line printing services
The magazine I work for these days, Digital Camera Magazine, wants to do a
roundup and comparison article on the on-line printing services. I'm not
writing it, but I offered to help the writer by getting some opinions
That you're in the USA is a pity, because I could give you some nasty
comments from recent experience with European services... I'd suggest that
you make software quality also a factor in the comparison, as that was the
major problem I bumped into when trying to find a decent online printing
This one time, at band camp, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're a USA publication, we're
interested in services in the USA.
Well, you would not find much pleasant to write about in .au
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is
work for these days, Digital Camera Magazine, wants
to do a roundup and comparison article on the on-line printing
services. I'm not writing it, but I offered to help the writer by
getting some opinions.
I'd appreciate feedback from people who have used such services for
ordinary
Hi Bob,
Here in Portland, Oregon, I use Quickstop Photo for on-line printing. Q.S.
is a locally owned company founded way back in 1949. I believe the son of
the owner is the one who set up the on-line service.
Jim A.
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date
Sorry to all if you receive this email twice, I did not see it on the
list... greetings Markus
-Original Message-
From: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:14 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Digital printing kiosk quality
Hi Brian
thanks
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems - Update
Firstly let me apologize for not answering all your responses. I read
them and tried the suggested fixes. My thanks to all.
This is what I did:
1) I used 3/4 of a ink cartridge running head cleaning cycles using
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/27 Wed PM 12:36:26 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems - Update
Sounds like you're ready for the Pentax Lens fungus correction procedure
(backyard, large sledge hammer )
Won't cure your
G'day Mike,
I might give that a go this weekend.
Dave S
On 4/27/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
7) At this point I got desperate pulled the damn thing apart. Using
a syringe some silicone tubing and a 50-50 solution of warm water
isopropyl alcohol, I flushed all the
9:46 PM
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems - Update
Hi Dave
I have not been paying attention as I see too many ink jet problems on the
Epson printer group I monitor.
Intermittent problems like this in Epsons at least (not sure what yours is)
are frequently caused by air leaks where the ink cartridge plugs into the
printer.
HTH
Powell
At 06:42
Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems - Update
After I flushed the nozzles I did some test prints and the first 2
came out great. I thought to myself You little ripper. Of course the
third print
On Apr 26, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Brian Dunn wrote:
Take an sRGB image, put it onto a CD, and go around to all the various
printing kiosks and order some 4x6s. Amazing variance in results.
Whites which go blue, blacks which go green, saturation and contrast
cranked way up, colors which are more
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently been thinking about upgrading to
R1800...hmm...I
think I feel an enablement coming on.g
Dave S
Get it. You won't be sorry!
I bought one a couple of weeks ago. Fabulous quality.
Wendy
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dunn
Subject: Digital printing kiosk quality
Here's an area which you'd figure digital would have helped tremendously
but which seems to still be a big problem... You'd think by now that
anywhere which takes a digital image in sRGB and produces
Firstly let me apologize for not answering all your responses. I read
them and tried the suggested fixes. My thanks to all.
This is what I did:
1) I used 3/4 of a ink cartridge running head cleaning cycles using
the printer management utility Jens suggested.
2) Made several test prints.
3) I
Have you tried to adjust the heads' alignment ?
Andre
print on the spot
would more or less have its colors and contrast optimized such that 255 is
white, 0 is black, and skin tones look human.
Take an sRGB image, put it onto a CD, and go around to all the various printing
kiosks and order some 4x6s. Amazing variance in results. Whites which go
G'day PDML'ers
After a year of not being satisfied with my prints, I sat down last
Sunday and read everything I could find on the subject of colour
management. Long story short, success, I am now able to produce
consistent, if not perfect, results.
But...
I've now got problems with blue lines
I've seen this problem but never experienced it personally. Those I
know who've corrected it have done so with numerous head cleanings.
Epson printers won't clog if they're used regularly, but when they sit,
they're trouble.
Paul
On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:51 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day PDML'ers
I had a similar problem with my Canon S820. Of course it has a
removable head, but the cost is up near $100. The printer could be
replaced for $150. I nearly used up an entire set of ink running the
deep cleaning, and even tried alcohol swabs on the head to unclog the jets.
The final
Dave -
Sometimes banding will occur when high speed printing is enabled.
Disable high speed in the printer properties and see if that solves the
problem
-P
David Savage wrote:
G'day PDML'ers
After a year of not being satisfied with my prints, I sat down last
Sunday and read everything I
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems
I've now got problems with blue lines running through all my prints:
http://tinyurl.com/9ub3b
The only time I have seen that sort of banding was when I ran the printer at
less than best quality.
William Robb
Sorry to say, but I had two cheap Epson printers that were used
regularly that still clogged. My more expensive one never had a
problem.
Based on my experiences, I will never buy another cheap Epson. Go up
a bit in price and they work well.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, April 23, 2005,
I was going to get a cheap Epson for making cheap proof prints, but heard
similar comments about clogging. I've just started looking at HP printers.
Which model do you have, Bruce?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
Sorry to say, but I had two cheap Epson printers that were used
if the nozzle printing is coming out clear, then there is something else
wrong. double check the nozzle pattern. if it really is perfect, then it is
software or possibly electrical interference on the printing cable.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dave
Try to install: SSC service utility, which will enable powerfull head
celaning: www.ssclg.com
as well as restting ink counters, which makes i s possible to install
cleaning cartridges and later shift to (half used) ink caartridges.
Regards
Jens
G'day PDML'ers
After a year of not being
On 23/4/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
if the nozzle printing is coming out clear, then there is something else
wrong. double check the nozzle pattern. if it really is perfect, then it is
software or possibly electrical interference on the printing cable.
What about head alignment
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:39:06 +0100, Cotty wrote:
What about head alignment?
You know, when you leave the barn door open that wide, you have to
expect a horse to walk in ... or at least a horse's ass. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: Inkjet Printing Problems
On 23/4/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
if the nozzle printing is coming out clear, then there is something else
wrong. double check the nozzle pattern. if it really is perfect
On 23/4/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
since the head is fixed and only some nozzles are having this problem, it
would have to come that way from the factory. i doubt that. the nozzles are
a single fixed assembly that is either good or bad, not partly bad.
I have a S9000 and it
Jens,
Looking at the blue strikes, even on the white area, it doesn't look like a
clogged print head, but one that is spraying blue ink where it shouldn't.
That also would be consistent with the correct nozzle chack pattern and
no improvement after head cleaning.
Why is this? Is it coming from
I have the 7960 - I am happy with it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, April 23, 2005, 12:14:11 PM, you wrote:
SB I was going to get a cheap Epson for making cheap proof prints, but heard
SB similar comments about clogging. I've just started looking at HP printers.
SB Which model do you
Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Inkjet Printing Problems
I have a S9000 and it allows for alignment of the 5 colours and black. If
they are not aligned, banding occurs. The driver software has
It's hard not to like the HP 7960 or 8450 for a cheap, high quality
proof printer. It's about the only consumer grade printer that has a
factory supplied grayscale inkset for decent BW printing with little
to no metamerism. HP inks and paper are a little pricey, but unless
you're printing
Tried that Paul, it didn't help.
Thanks anyway.
Dave S
On 4/24/05, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave -
Sometimes banding will occur when high speed printing is enabled.
Disable high speed in the printer properties and see if that solves the
problem
-P
David Savage
G'day Bruce,
I wouldn't call it cheap. At AU$550 it was the top of the line Epson
A4 photo printer when I got it :-)
I let it sit for about a month without using it. Up until then I was
quit fanatical about running it at least once a week. I thought the
head charging cycle it went through every
G'day Fritz,
I've only ever used genuine Epson inks.
Dave S
On 4/24/05, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens,
Looking at the blue strikes, even on the white area, it doesn't look like a
clogged print head, but one that is spraying blue ink where it shouldn't.
That also would be
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's hard not to like the HP 7960 or 8450 for a cheap, high quality
proof printer. It's about the only consumer grade printer that has a
factory supplied grayscale inkset for decent BW printing with little to
no metamerism. HP inks and paper are a little pricey
. april 2005 23:14
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems
Dave
Try to install: SSC service utility, which will enable powerfull head
celaning: www.ssclg.com
as well as restting ink counters, which makes i s possible to install
cleaning cartridges and later shift to (half used
Wüthrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. april 2005 00:48
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: OT: Inkjet Printing Problems
Jens,
Looking at the blue strikes, even on the white area, it doesn't look like a
clogged print head, but one that is spraying blue ink where it shouldn't.
That also
Our print department at work has been running PS ver 4 since i dont
know when.
Well his wish
list was answered today. New box,DVD machine and PSCS.
I'll have to go vist more often.LOL
Dave
result also depends on the capabilities of
their printing processes.
If your files are going to press then I'd suggest using Adobe RGB as
it's pretty much an industry standard. It'd pay to ask your clients if
they have a preference. Just make sure you record your current setup
in case something
Paul Stenquist asked: Mac or PC? What software are you printing
from?
A Mac of course. Is there any other kind worth using? Raw files
converted to tif format in Pentax Photo Lab 2.1, opened and
attempting to print in Photoshop 7.
You might try printing using the ICM feature. Mac's with Colorsynch
Hi Godfrey,
Well, it's good to know we have an informed Apple resource on the list
:-). While you're here, I have a question. I'm printing with colorsynch
and getting very good results, printing to an Epson 2200. When I first
selected Colorsynch Worklflow in my PhotoShop color settings panel
Mac or PC? What software are you printing from?
Paul
On Mar 4, 2005, at 12:58 AM, Timothy Stark wrote:
I have recently started shooting Raw files, I have the update
browser and photolab. I convert raw files to tif and open them in
Photoshop 7 on a Mac in OS X.
I cannot get accurate colour
Paul Stenquist asked: Mac or PC? What software are you printing
from?
A Mac of course. Is there any other kind worth using? Raw files
converted to tif format in Pentax Photo Lab 2.1, opened and
attempting to print in Photoshop 7.
-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:58 AM
Subject: Printing Raw Problems
I have recently started shooting Raw files, I have the update
browser and photolab. I convert raw files to tif and open them in
Photoshop 7 on a Mac in OS X.
I cannot get accurate colour printing to an Epson
--- Timothy Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist asked: Mac or PC? What software are you
printing from?
A Mac of course. Is there any other kind worth using? Raw
files converted to tif format in Pentax Photo Lab 2.1, opened
and
attempting to print in Photoshop 7.
It's not so much
Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:58 AM
Subject: Printing Raw Problems
I have recently started shooting Raw
the Color Settings box, go
to the top menu Settings. Under this menu select ColorSynch Workflow. That
should get you very close to perfect printer output.
Paul
Paul Stenquist asked: Mac or PC? What software are you printing
from?
A Mac of course. Is there any other kind worth using? Raw files
By the way, when you open your tiff in PhotoShop it may ask you if you want the
embedded profile or the working space. Select the working space if you're going
to use colorsynch workflow.
Paul
Paul Stenquist asked: Mac or PC? What software are you printing
from?
A Mac of course
Thank you for all the suggestions! I will work through them over the next few
days. I was hoping to be able to use the device profiles to avoid purchasing
yet another piece of gear.
Many thanks
--- Timothy Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for all the suggestions! I will work through them
over the next few days. I was hoping to be able to use the
device profiles to avoid purchasing yet another piece of gear.
I know what you mean, Tim. Unfortunately, no amount of using
profiles
Some monitors can be calibrated quite accurately with the Mac display software.
I don't know what kind of monitor Tim is using, but the Apple Cinema Display,
for example, can be dialed in very nicely with the system software. If your
printer output is accurate and your monitor matches your
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Printing Raw Problems
Some monitors can be calibrated quite accurately with the Mac
display software. I don't know what kind of monitor Tim is using,
but the Apple Cinema Display, for example, can be dialed in very
nicely
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some monitors can be calibrated quite accurately with the Mac
display software. I don't know what kind of monitor Tim is
using, but the Apple Cinema Display, for example, can be
dialed in very nicely with the system software. If your
printer output is accurate and
I have recently started shooting Raw files, I have the update
browser and photolab. I convert raw files to tif and open them in
Photoshop 7 on a Mac in OS X.
I cannot get accurate colour printing to an Epson 825, the colours
are overly bright an browns become solarized reds. The same shot
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it is possible that the Wal-Mart has a terminal that sends to the
lab, but it looks the same as the kiosk.
One thing with the Noritsu labs, they are most comfortable working with sRGB
files, so get used to that colourspace.
Yeah, here in
myself picky but this printing is driving me insane!
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
Hi Wendy.
I have been sending 90% of my printouts to Futureshops online photo printing
service.
I think they do a good job.They use Kodak Royal Paper and i'm sure print
Have you considered one of the online services like EZ Prints?
-Original Message-
From: wendy beard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:03 PM
To: pentax-discuss
Subject: photo printing rant
Photo finishing here is just getting worse!
I had just prepared an 8x10
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: photo printing rant
Yeah, here in Vancouver I have tried some labs and finally settled
with, you know
what, Costco in Richmond. Despite the ridiclous low price, the
digital print quality
is very good. In fact, they are more predictable
with my Epson 2000P so decided to try a few local
photo printing places. Up until the end of last year I had been using an
independent lab downtown with good results. They have since been taken over
by a local chain and the last lot of prints I took there all had some sort
of staining on the edge
. I have been
having problems recently with my Epson 2000P so decided to try a few local
photo printing places. Up until the end of last year I had been using an
independent lab downtown with good results. They have since been taken over
by a local chain and the last lot of prints I took
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: photo printing rant
Apparently they wanted her to use the kiosk to print her own out. She was
not impressed and informed me that they had one of those kiosks in the
Loblaws store where she worked and the paper was crap and so were
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:14:08 -0800, Adam McKenty wrote:
I've put some photos together into a calendar (yes, a bit behind schedule),
and I'm getting it printed by someone who runs a local news paper and
offers printing services on the side. Unfortunately neither I nor the
person doing
- Original Message -
From: Adam McKenty
Subject: Colour laser printing issues
Hi folks,
I've put some photos together into a calendar (yes, a bit behind
schedule), and I'm getting it printed by someone who runs a local
news paper and offers printing services on the side
Hi folks,
I've put some photos together into a calendar (yes, a bit behind schedule),
and I'm getting it printed by someone who runs a local news paper and
offers printing services on the side. Unfortunately neither I nor the
person doing the printing know much about the complexities
Makes judging quality easy then, don't it...
Cotty wrote:
All my pro quality prints are completely jet black.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graywolf wrote:
LOL!
Okay, call me simple minded, but I don't get it. Jet black prints? That's humorous??
If it's photographic and it's not black it's not 'professional'...
LOL!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Hi,
What do you think about a Pixma IP4000? It also uses BCI6 cartidges, btw.
Alex Sarbu
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:57:53 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I am in the market for a new printer to print off a few images
On Dec 20, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I must have hit the minilab jackpot, the lab I'm working with now
provides
12x18 prints out of a well calibrated Agfa d-lab 2 for AU$5.00 (or
about
US$3.80) a print. They will print with a border or border-less with
bleed (I
add a 2% border and
Hello all,
I am in the market for a new printer to print off a few images from
time to time and occasional other stuff as well.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Hi Leon.
I have not had a chance to look at
Hello all,
I am in the market for a new printer to print off a few images from
time to time and occasional other stuff as well.
The question is do I go for an ink jet printer or a colour laser
printer?
The laser seems cheaper to run and a bit more to buy. The laser also
has advantages in the
? What
percent of the printing will be for photos? My HP 7960, which uses 8
colors, can swap the photo black/gray cartridge for an all black one
to save on ink and print faster. I suspect that other inkjets do the
same. If speed of printing is important, then get one of the Canon
printers
Hi Leon
I had the chance to print for free on a friends Canon A3 CP660 color laser
printer some times ago.
In the default settings, the pictures where way too dark and to much red and
blue.
Interestingly, Red seems to be the most critical color to print.
The printer can be adjusted in it's menus
on, but here it goes. So far, I haven't seen a color
laser print that really looks like a photograph (unlike the inkjets).
Seems that color lasers are more useful for things like business
graphics.
Other things to consider - do you want to print on 4x6 paper? What
percent of the printing
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser printing
Laser printers are for mass production and speed. If you want photo
quality prints, you have to go with an inkjet. I've printed for
gallery shows, my portfolio and various other critical projects
with my Epson 2200
printing
Laser printers are for mass production and speed. If you want photo
quality prints, you have to go with an inkjet. I've printed for
gallery shows, my portfolio and various other critical projects
with my Epson 2200. The quality is outstanding.
Often, you can get away from
: 12/19/2004 12:08:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser printing
Really? My digital minilab does decent work, but they get $10 for an
11x14. I can print a far superior 11x 17 for about $4 on my Epson 2200. And
I get to keep the full frame without going up another print size.
Paul
$$ for an expensive printer.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12/19/2004 12:08:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Ink or Laser printing
Really? My digital minilab does decent work, but they get $10 for an
11x14. I can print a far superior 11x 17 for about $4 on my
Hi Shel
color prints from my Epson 2100 on good paper are *much* better than from
the color lasers I have seen.
Color lasers are very good for business chart prints but not for *critical*
photos
like portraits with skin tones or large uniform areas of color.
I think I already know the results of
701 - 800 of 1101 matches
Mail list logo
