Well I took some firework photos last night I forgot to turn SR off.
They turned out fine.
I also took this shot after the fireworks, mainly as a long exposure/noise test.
Small (800x536 ~100kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0733_sml.jpg
Full size (3872x2592 ~1M)
On 14/1/07, Ken Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed:
They already
virtually announced that the next model would be K1D which is
supposedly a pro or near pro model :-).
'Virtually : 2. Almost but not quite; nearly'
(source: Dictionary.com)
You mean the 645D ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
The 4th shot of the tree against the light is very good. Excellently
exposed and captures the fresh feeling of the woodland, and the
character of the tree, very well. I half expect Robin Hood to appear.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On 14/1/07, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/amwall.html
istDS, A50/1.4 @ f/7.1, 1/250 sec hand held, ISO 200
Comments welcome
What is that in the foreground?
Looks like a seal.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
From: John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/15 Mon AM 12:43:34 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - American Wall / American Grafiti
From:
Shel Belinkoff
Continuing to photograph the area in which I live and frequent, this one
has also become part of my flag series.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/amwall.html
istDS, A50/1.4 @ f/7.1, 1/250 sec hand held, ISO 200
Comments welcome
What is that in the foreground?
Looks like a seal.
Must be the Great Seal of the United States.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/15 Mon AM 07:39:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Gimiky Gallery - Take 2
Well that worked a treat didn't it? Bugger!
It seems to be an issue with ImageShack who host's the pictures that
are referenced by
F*$k it! I hate Flash.
Put it this way, if you could get it to work you would see an open
book. By clicking dragging the corner of the page it has an effect
that looks like, yep you guessed it, turning the page of a book. The
photo on the next page is distorted to look like it's on curling
Hi all.
I borrowed a K100D from a friend for the weekend, mainly to get a feel
for how the actual process of using a manual lens with it is. I have to
say, it's quite easy to do -- lens+ae lock isn't hard, especially since
I've been shooting (intentionally) with a fully manual camera (K1000)
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:51:56 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Under lens ID part, it has correctly picked up both a 80-320 zoom and a tamron
28-300 zoom.
I have tried an A lens and all it said was a series lens.
Would there be a an entry at all for the focal length entered?
The camera can get the
LOL
Thanks Markus.
Dave
On 1/15/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I found this link on photo.net and of course there is *no Pentax* gear
involved ;-)
Enjoy some funny photographer shots :
http://granik.com/blog/2007/01/13/funny-photo-pictures/
--
PDML
Hi,
(
I should clarify, i already own the 16-45 also and i own the 14mm and
have primes that cover this range, i think the difference between the
wide ends of the zooms wouldnt bother me that much.
I was more curious about the optical qualities of the 18-55 compared
to the 16-45, I'm really
My particular 16-45 is quite a bit sharper than the 18-55 at 28mm, and they
are comparable in sharpness at 50mm. The 16-45 has noticably better contrast
at either focal length.
The 16-45 also has comparable sharpness and better contrast than an M 28 f2.8
prime which I have here.
The 16-45
Sometimes described as 'an overbearing metaphor'.
It loaded fine on my machine (XP), but isn't worth the effort.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Savage
Sent: 15 January 2007 09:09
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Cesar and Dan
I sent mine via email attachement since I got the same error with the form.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:28 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: February Pug
Just tried a Sigma 28-90 3.5-5.6 AF zoom (macro) and show tags reported the
following.
DNG Data: Lens Identification63 1 2 @0x032C 3 44
SIGMA 18-50mm F3.5-5.6/12-24mm F4.5/Tamron 35-90mm F4 AF
Maybe a small adjustment is in order unless other lens report the same ID.
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Cesar and Dan
I sent mine via email attachement since I got the same error with the form.
greetings
Markus
I must be missing something. I'm only seeing last year's themes, and
the one for January this year. Is
http://pug.komkon.org/general/themes.html the
I shot this in the back yard this evening (About 1/2 and hour ago actually)
with the 600mm mirror lens and 2x teleconverter. That hill is 2 suburbs
away (about 3km). This was a 76 second exposure with the wireless remote.
I only closed the shutter when the comet disappeared behind the hill.
Hi all,
In December I sent two zooms with falling damage (FA 28-105 powerzoom and
F70-210) to Pentax for repair. I promised to report back on the quality of
the service:
The good news is they were fairly fast, exactly one month in the holiday
season. The bad news is the FA will cost more
Thanks Brian.
Regards,
Paul
On 15/01/2007, at 8:41 PM, Brian Dunn wrote:
My particular 16-45 is quite a bit sharper than the 18-55 at 28mm,
and they
are comparable in sharpness at 50mm. The 16-45 has noticably
better contrast
at either focal length.
The 16-45 also has comparable
I suspect the difference would be small.
Bob
On Jan 14, 2007, at 1:06 PM, John Celio wrote:
Will setting P to MTF mode produce sharper images, on average, than
normal
Program mode?
As my old friend Fred Picker used to always say when asked questions
like this, TRY IT.
That's the only
Now, come on. You just added a sloping white line in Photoshop, didn't you.
Interesting capture - I went out comet watching too but there was just too much
dirty haze in the south west to get a decent view. Saw it through binoculars
though.
Cheers
Brian
Normal shots just showed a white dot, so I decided to track it to the
horizon with a longer exposure. It moved a long way in 76 seconds!
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:55 PM
On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
I found this link on photo.net and of course there is *no Pentax* gear
involved ;-)
Enjoy some funny photographer shots :
http://granik.com/blog/2007/01/13/funny-photo-pictures/
Some of those are effing hilarious!!!
Bob
--
PDML
Actually, it's the Presidential Seal.
-P
Bob W wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/amwall.html
istDS, A50/1.4 @ f/7.1, 1/250 sec hand held, ISO 200
Comments welcome
What is that in the foreground?
Looks like a seal.
Must be the Great Seal of the United States.
Bob
--
Godrey,
What type of screen you had made for the DS? You may have already
discussed it but I lost track of that email. I did check the Katz Eye
site and it looks to be a good option for screens not offered by Pentax.
Angel
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 7:23 PM, K.Takeshita
From:
Charles Robinson
On Jan 14, 2007, at 18:18, John Sessoms wrote:
Lucked onto it last Wednesday 10Jan07
[snip!]
We were out on a flood control dam shooting west over a lake, which gave
a low horizon. I got maybe a dozen images, none of them spectacular, but
at least one does show a
That's my favorite as well. Pretty pic. I also like the Golden Gate
pic. An interesting perspective.
Paul
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:20 AM, Bob W wrote:
The 4th shot of the tree against the light is very good. Excellently
exposed and captures the fresh feeling of the woodland, and the
character of
On 1/15/07, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Cesar and Dan
I sent mine via email attachement since I got the same error with the form.
greetings
Markus
I must be missing something. I'm only seeing last year's themes, and
the one for January this year.
Pentax has announced the 645. They've also indicated there will be a
top of the line addition to the K series.
Paul
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:10 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 14/1/07, Ken Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed:
They already
virtually announced that the next model would be K1D which is
- Original Message -
From: David Savage Subject: Re: OT: Gimiky Gallery - Take 2
F*$k it! I hate Flash.
Put it this way, if you could get it to work you would see an open
book. By clicking dragging the corner of the page it has an effect
that looks like, yep you guessed it,
What's the average size of RAW and DNG image files on K10D?
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/15/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice pictures,
Thanks Bill.
really sucky website.
Yep. The novelty has well and truly worn off.
I got as far as the BW fern and gave up
I'm surprised you lasted that long :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Roman Subject: K10D RAW and DNG image size
What's the average size of RAW and DNG image files on K10D?
DNG is about 16mb. I haven't shot a PEF yet, as ACR doesn't support them yet
(AFAIK).
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Here is a quick test i did a few weeks ago.
http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/K10D%20SR%20Test.html
First two are at 1/10 and the second two at 1/180
Gives you an idea
Dave
Quoting Sandy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pentax claim their shake reduction is worth 2.5 to 4 stops. Some
Canon
On 1/14/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The doctor called me yesterday and wants me to go into the hospital for
some tests. I'll be leaving in a couple of hours and will be away for a
short while. I usually don't put my business on the internet, but I'm a
little concerned, and
On 1/12/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=200066245436
LOL
Is it April Fools' Day and I didn't notice?
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/15/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty, you will regret this. But as long as you save enough money for a
free ticket to Japan for me, I have no complaint.
Oh, and don't forget a sturdy shaver.
and :-))
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/15/07 3:10 AM, Cotty, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They already
virtually announced that the next model would be K1D which is
supposedly a pro or near pro model :-).
'Virtually : 2. Almost but not quite; nearly'
(source: Dictionary.com)
Cotty, you will regret this. But as long as
On 15/1/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pentax has announced the 645. They've also indicated there will be a
top of the line addition to the K series.
My hat awaits on the dining table ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16 GB
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: K10D RAW and DNG image size
What's the average size of RAW and DNG image files on K10D?
--
new photos ever so often...
On 15/1/07, K.Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you will regret this. But as long as you save enough money for a
free ticket to Japan for me, I have no complaint.
Oh, and don't forget a sturdy shaver.
No regrets! Publish and be damned! Words to fall by ;-)
I wish to heaven that it
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:32:14 +0100, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in the LX. Not sure where I read it, but I think the LX screens are
supposed to work, or at least some of them are.
Hi John,
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, Pentax change
physical screen size
I couple the DA14 with the FA20-35 and DA21, Paul, so the wide field
coverage is nicely covered for my uses. I love the DA14's field of
view, but even with that I use the FA20-35 at 28-35mm much more than
I use it at 20mm, and I use the DA21 a LOT. The FA20-35 nets nearly
prime quality
No, it's not the Great Seal, he is much bigger.
No, it's not a baby seal, they are white.
And no, it's not the Presidential Seal, he's in Washington
and looks a lot more like George...
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/15/07, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it's the Presidential Seal.
-P
I don't own the 16-45 although I'm considering buying it but I own the
18-55 and I must say it is a very honest lens. Sure it is cheap slow
consumer zoom but it does its job more than well.
I use it with the 50-200 in my every day photos and I'm quite
satisfied with it. It is also very
Hi Peter
http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
shows the older themes and has a link for the upload form.
In the upload form you see all of the themes for 2007.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Peter McIntosh
Sent:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Angel Ramos wrote:
What type of screen you had made for the DS? You may have already
discussed it but I lost track of that email. I did check the Katz
Eye
site and it looks to be a good option for screens not offered by
Pentax.
I had Katz Eye Optics
What if you use a fast lens? An F 1.2 prime plus the claimed 2.5-4
stops gives F 0.5 or better.
I don't know if anyone has tested Pentax's claims for SR, but in in my
experience it does indeed give you a big boost in low-light capability.
A few weeks ago I posted a link to an experimental K10D
I did check the Katz Eye site and it looks to be a good option for
screens not offered by Pentax.
Angel
-
The Katz Eye screens are well respected, but they may affect metering.
Some people don't mind this, or develop compensation or workarounds for
it. For me, it is a deal-breaker, so I
Gabriel,
Nice shots from the Seattle farmer's market. They are all closed in Chicago.
Yes, it is not hard to shoot older lenses with the current Pentax digitals.
I know the batteries limited the number of pictures you took, but take more.
It's one of the joys of digital versus film. Experiment,
I don't generally think too hard about how many stops the SR will
net me, I just use it and find that it lets me hold the camera steady
for longer exposure times. Quite a bit longer in most cases ... With
lenses in my normal range (20-77mm), I find 1/10, 1/4 and even 1/2
second quite
Bruce,
You've been busy again! The bridge is great stuff.
I looked thru all the shots from the first back thru the gallery to
the PESO of the bridge over the creek. There was lots of nice stuff
there and the snow shot with the weed stalks adjacent to a little hill
was on the verge of something
On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I did check the Katz Eye site and it looks to be a good option for
screens not offered by Pentax.
The Katz Eye screens are well respected, but they may affect metering.
The focusing aid is what causes metering issues as the focusing aid
Paul,
I bought a 18-55 from a list member and put it on the DS which my wife
is using. The package handles a lot 'smaller' than the K10D with the
16-45, and the results look just fine for a walk-about lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/15/07, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(
I should clarify, i
Last week I finished a roll that had lived in my Voigtlander Vitessa for
more than a year. I took it for processing over the weekend and had fun
parsing through the results. Compared to my *ist-Ds, the delayed
gratification is both maddening and fun! It's a little magical to break out
the
So, if you buy the package from these guys, will you always have the
Get Your Own tag hanging down there?
I'm assuming the free version will, but what about the Pro version?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Paul. That type of view of a bridge is certainly different
than normal - probably some of it's appeal.
--
Bruce
Monday, January 15, 2007, 5:35:15 AM, you wrote:
PS That's my favorite as well. Pretty pic. I also like the Golden Gate
PS pic. An interesting perspective.
PS Paul
PS On Jan
Hello Gabriel,
Some good shots there, especially for a test drive. I think you have
found, like many, that the usage of pre 'A' lenses is not that big of
a deal. For me, like you, I shoot manual exposure most of the time
anyway so it is not an issue at all. Those that want to shoot in AV
mode
On 1/15/07, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16 GB
Yikes!!! I'd better get a new hard drive! And a few more SD cards!
--
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello jim,
With my K10D, when I put on a pre 'F' lens, you can put in the focal
length for SR purposes. I have found that whatever focal length is
entered is the focal length recorded for the shot. So you can get
some idea what lens you used from that. On my *istD, you just get no
information.
Thanks, Bob. Several people who have seen that one really liked it.
You have articulated what originally caught my eye.
--
Bruce
Monday, January 15, 2007, 12:20:57 AM, you wrote:
BW The 4th shot of the tree against the light is very good. Excellently
BW exposed and captures the fresh feeling
This is a computer website, not a photo oriented website so don't ask too much.
However they do indeed point the particuliar K10D features and there
are interesting comparison photos.
Didn't have time to read everyting but it seems a quite honest review
from a tech site.
D80 got:
Ergonomics: 4/5
Way too much silliness/incompatibility/etc in all these flash and
photo hosting sites. The nicest flash display tool I recall seeing in
recent months is the one that Juan Buhler is using in
http://www.jbuhler.com/f/start/index.html
I'm thinking I might try this one.
I like the lighthouse
Must be the Great Seal of the United States.
Na. Shel took the image in California, therefore it must be great seal of
California.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PESO - American Wall / American Grafiti
Hi Boris,
As a rule I never use the computer to delete images from the card.
As much as possible i even avoid deleting inidividual images in camera
for 2 reasons:
a) I don't like evaluating an image on the lcd screen
b) Increases likelyhood of corruption.
When i erase the card I always
On 1/15/07 12:57 PM, Thibouille, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D80 got:
Ergonomics: 4/5
Functions: 3.5/5
Picture Quality: 4/5
K10D got:
Ergonomics: 4/5
Functions: 4.5/5
Picture Quality: 4/5
Seeing various reviews, I am convinced that Pentax's investment to beef up
their imaging processing
Best of luck Shel. Hurry back.
dk
On 1/14/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The doctor called me yesterday and wants me to go into the hospital for
some tests. I'll be leaving in a couple of hours and will be away for a
short while. I usually don't put my business on the internet,
Oddly, the K10D compresses the PEF files but not the
DNG files.
My ist D produces ~13 MB PEFs. My workflow is to put
the card in a card reader, and import pix onto the
home Mac as (losslessly) compressed DNGs using Adobe
DNG Convertor. Those DNGs are 5-6 MB.
Rick
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL
LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Six British schoolboys were rushed to the
hospital after taking the erection-enhancing drug Viagra at lunchtime
for a dare, the school said Thursday. Paramedics were called after a
fellow student told teachers about the 13-year-olds' prank, a
spokesperson for Forest
On Jan 14, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
No titles, hopefully that won't detract too much.
I generally prefer photos without titling unless the titling is
essential to direct my attention...
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/8
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16 GB
Yikes!!! I'd better get a new hard drive! And a few more SD cards!
LOL ... of course, Mbytes were meant, not Gbytes.
I set the K10D for capture as RAW/DNG format. I run the DNG files
through Adobe's DNG
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:00:27AM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
I found this link on photo.net and of course there is *no Pentax* gear
involved ;-)
Enjoy some funny photographer shots :
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Peter
http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
shows the older themes and has a link for the upload form.
In the upload form you see all of the themes for 2007.
greetings
Markus
Thanks, Markus.
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
David Savage wrote:
This site hasn't been updated. Adelheid posted this back in December:
http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2006-December/043060.html
Cheers,
Dave
Aha - cool. It's bookmarked now. Thanks, Dave.
Ciao,
P
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:04:26AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The kit lens is relatively worthless, due to the number available.
Put it on the shelf for the day you sell the camera.
I think it's a little better than that. I've got one as a stop-gap
until the DA* 16-50/f2.8 is available,
So has anyone successfully uploaded an image for the Feb PUG? And how was
that accomplished?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: February Pug uploading error?
David Savage wrote:
This site hasn't been updated. Adelheid posted this
Hi Mark
and how would you explain a little girl that she can't instantly review the
photo you took of her.
Yesterday, I showed the film capsule and told her that I have to send it to
the labs for the prints because it is an old camera but she didn't
understand :-)
I know what you mean with the
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:07:41AM -0800, Rick Womer wrote:
Oddly, the K10D compresses the PEF files but not the
DNG files.
Not too odd. Compression (of any kind) was only added at the
last minute; as little as a month before the final release of
the camera there was no compression of either
On Monday 15 January 2007 11:51, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Hi all,
In December I sent two zooms with falling damage (FA 28-105 powerzoom and
F70-210) to Pentax for repair. I promised to report back on the quality of
the service:
The good news is they were fairly fast, exactly one month in the
True. But some of them just show a group of photographers at work.
I don't see what's particularly noteworthy about a truck fitted out
with a multi-tier photographer stand; I presume it's for covering
something like a marathon or other event run on city streets.
They have a truck? I
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Mike Hamilton wrote:
On 1/15/07, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16 GB
Yikes!!! I'd better get a new hard drive! And a few more SD cards!
I'm watching the price on the Buffalo 2TB setup. That's 1TB fully
mirrored (which
Hi Mark
I got a Voigtlaender Bessamatic SLR with a zoom and a prime for free but it
was way too heavy for me to use it.
And I prefer the look and build feeling of the 1959 Agfa Ambiflex SLR with
35mm prime over it, it's the only old camera I have left and will use
sometimes.
greetings
Markus
On 15/1/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
True. But some of them just show a group of photographers at work.
I don't see what's particularly noteworthy about a truck fitted out
with a multi-tier photographer stand; I presume it's for covering
something like a marathon or other event
That should give them somewhere to hang their wet towels.
They must have been inspired by living so close to Winnersh Triangle,
and in a Forest school. That sort of Carry On is bound to get the
boys' imaginations racing. They can expect a stiff punishment (and the
eternal admiration of their
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Once I get it sorted out, I'll think about whether I want to put in
the time to wrap this into a useful UI, etc. It is a largish effort
as I will need to unwrap all the code that extracts the data and
separate it into
and bought istDs. :-) Crazy man am I not?
The K10D is admirable camera but it's on the big side of comfortable for
me (both size and weight). The K100D was also ruled out, because the
viewfinder is not up to the quality of K10D/istDs viewfinders and build
quality seemed to be lower as well.
Godfrey,
Were I to need the 4G capacity, I'd buy the Sandisk Ultra II SDHC,
which come with a compatible reader. But for now I'm standardized,
and content with, 2G capacity cards.
BTW my Transcend 4GB (non SD-HC) works just fine in my istDs (~360 RAW
exposures available after formatting,
The last apples of the season, at the local farmer's
market in mid-December.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458065
ist D, FA 16-45, ISO 200, 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/8, RAW, minor
adjustments in PE4.
Comments most welcome.
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
How are you opening PEF files. My dng converter on the ibook is the
newest, but won't recognise them.
Dave
Quoting Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oddly, the K10D compresses the PEF files but not the
DNG files.
My ist D produces ~13 MB PEFs. My workflow is to put
the card in a card
On Jan 15, 2007, at 12:48 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Once I get it sorted out, I'll think about whether I want to put in
the time to wrap this into a useful UI, etc. It is a largish effort
as I will need to unwrap all the code
On 1/15/07 3:05 PM, John Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. But some of them just show a group of photographers at work.
I don't see what's particularly noteworthy about a truck fitted out
with a multi-tier photographer stand; I presume it's for covering
something like a marathon or
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:59:13PM +1000, jim wrote:
Just tried a Sigma 28-90 3.5-5.6 AF zoom (macro) and show tags reported the
following.
DNG Data: Lens Identification63 1 2 @0x032C 3 44
SIGMA 18-50mm F3.5-5.6/12-24mm F4.5/Tamron 35-90mm F4 AF
Maybe a small
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:28:36PM +1000, jim wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:51:56 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Under lens ID part, it has correctly picked up both a 80-320 zoom and a
tamron 28-300 zoom.
I have tried an A lens and all it said was a series lens.
It really said A series
MB, of course!
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: K10D RAW and DNG image size
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16
Peter,
I had two of the Ds, with no hot pixels to speak of.
I'm using a K10D, but think the Ds is a great way into Pentax digital.
Make sure you get the download off the Pentax USA site.
It will upgrade the Ds functions to a Ds2 (2gig sd cards).
Pentax USA has the DS2 manual if necessary.
Regards,
We had an ice storm in Michigan today. Shot some pics this morning and
again this afternoon. The first is with the K85/1.8, the second is with
the Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro, and the last two are with the DA
50-200. All on the K10D.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458250size=lg
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:12:53PM -0500, K.Takeshita wrote:
On 1/15/07 3:05 PM, John Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. But some of them just show a group of photographers at work.
I don't see what's particularly noteworthy about a truck fitted out
with a multi-tier photographer
We'd say it was one boner of a mistake on this side of the pond... Bob S.
On 1/15/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That should give them somewhere to hang their wet towels.
They must have been inspired by living so close to Winnersh Triangle,
and in a Forest school. That sort of Carry On
Paul Stenquist wrote:
We had an ice storm in Michigan today. Shot some pics this morning and
again this afternoon. The first is with the K85/1.8, the second is with
the Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro, and the last two are with the DA
50-200. All on the K10D.
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
