Thanks mate. I manage fine with my 50mm macro lens which is manual focus.
What's bothering me with the 1.7 is the camera's focus indicator says the
focus is right, but subsequent viewing on the computer shows a slightly oof
shot.
Hopefully practice will make perfect.
- Original Message
A really well-deserved win - that's an excellent shot, and a nice
change from the bird-on-twig-with-catchlight cliché.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Sawyer
Sent: 06 February 2007 02:44
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
On 5/2/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
You
acted semi-rationally for about three messages so I turned it off,
Fatal mistake!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/06 Tue AM 12:52:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: combat photography
On 2/05/07 7:32 PM, P. J. Alling, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd have thought 16 would have been big enough...
K.Takeshita wrote:
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5010343
Well observed and excellently executed. I like it a lot.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
On 2/6/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some gut-wrenching stuff.
http://www.tomstoddart.com/
indeed. thanks for the link
subash
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nope.
HTH
Cheers,
Dave ;-)
On 2/6/07, jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 06/02/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What has film got to do with the K10D's lack of ISO 3200?
I can appreciate that in certain situations the advantages of having ISO
3200 available outweigh it's disadvantages.
I've taken very usable printable ISO 1600/3200 shots with the
Bill Sawyer wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5010343
Fabulous shot Bill! You deserve the win.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 05/02/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep my cameras on daylight white balance all the time, even if I'm
in a tungsten-lit room. I can't see any purpose in setting the camera
for such things when shooting raw. The only settings that matter are
shutter speed, aperture, ISO and colour
Excellent. Amazingly detailed.
Paul
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I wasn't sure if this lens would have enough resolution for the 10 mp
sensor. But I believe it does. This was shot at F8, and the lens's best
aperture is actually F11:
Maybe you should have your camera checked out, David. I find that noise
at 1600 with my K10D is quite minimal, less than with my *istD. This is
shot at 1600, and it's cropped to about 60%. No noise reduction.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5247870size=lg
Paul
On 06/02/07, David
I have it installed on Win XP so that I can use UF Raw occasionally but like
most people used to Windows, I find the GIMPs interface difficult. I really
want to like it but I just don't.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting jim
K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sweet shot Paul.
I admit, I have got good results at 1600 with the K10D in decent
light. But in really poor light the shots I have are quite noisy.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you should have your camera checked out, David. I find that noise
at 1600
Ya, but i had to explain it, so it does not count.:-)
Thanks for the comments Ann. I have the filters installed on both
computers now, and i'll play around toinight.
Dave
Dave
On 2/5/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey - who said you could take sign shots???
Harumph
Looks fine
I'v got the link to work now Mark.
Thanks
Dave
On 2/4/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I'll give it a whirl.
One question. I see sometime Gifs that have some action to them. I was
toying with making the transmission part of the whistle seen
Joe,
Love the shot. Great detail. I see those here in Chicago, just not right now!
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Amazingly detailed.
Paul
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I wasn't sure if this lens would have enough
The AK-47 (7.62x39 Russian) round is a low-power round. It will make
anybody unhappy, but it doesn't penetrate well against anything tougher
than human. It's more of a beefed up SMG round than a real rifle round,
as it ist replacement (5.45mm in the AK-74 and siblings).
If that had been
If you want to get anything for them, head over to APUG.org and try
selling them there, that's basicly your market.
Frankly, darkroom equipment is damned near worthless today, as so many
labs have been dumping theirs. Only something truly interesting will net
any $$. There's just too many
Paul,
That's a beautiful portrait shot of the woman.
As we age, youth and beauty fade - but not here.
The dog (puppy?) brings that spark and spontaneous expression of joy back.
My only wish is that she wasn't wearing her sun glasses.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grab them while you can. 650 euro a piece. I already have both of them, they
are awesome.
They also have some other nice stuff.
Click kleinbeeld and then Pentax at the left.
Frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks. Maybe they're underexposed a bit? This shot was taken in very
dim light. Just a bit of room tungsten lighting at night. But it's
right on with exposure. I think it was something like f2 @ 1/8th second.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:47 AM, David Savage wrote:
Sweet shot Paul.
I admit, I have
On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:27 AM, jim wrote:
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
No. Primary difficulties with The Gimp are the lack of 16 bit editing
and color management. For my work,
nicely done!
G
On Feb 6, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Form manual focus, if you have the viewfinder adjustment in sharp
focus, the usual issue is wide-open contrast of a given lens.
I find the focus indicator is right on the money for lenses in the f/
2.8 to f/4 range, but isn't accurate enough to use it alone with an f/
1.4-f/2 lens wide open.
Poor interface, no appreciable 16 bit support, no colour management.
Give it a pass.
Photoshop elements is dirt cheap, has almost enough 16 bit support and
just barely enough colour management. Give it a try.
-Adam
jim wrote:
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull
On 2/06/07 8:15 AM, Paul Stenquist, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shot was taken in very dim light. Just a bit of room tungsten lighting at
night.
That's amazing Paul.
It looks as if it was under a full lighting. Perhaps you brightened it up a
bit. I see no appreciable noise for 1600.
BTW,
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: PESO: The Greeting
K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
I remember whan my puppy was small enough for that
Nice picture Paul. It illustrates nicely why we keep dogs.
jim wrote:
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
The Gimp is a great program, but IMO it's got some problems for general
purpose photographic use. The most profound issue for me is that
Speaking of animated .gif's
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Master_GIF-Test.gif
Dave
On 2/6/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'v got the link to work now Mark.
Thanks
Dave
On 2/4/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I'll
Oh the under exposed shots are terrible (the K10D is less forgiving
than the D when it comes to exposure IMO). But even the correctly
exposed frames have this streaky blue channel noise through it.
In the busy parts of the shot isn't so noticeable, but in the black
areas it stands out like a sore
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:27 AM, jim wrote:
As subject says. anyone use this Free app?
Almost as powerfull as photoshop, in some ways, maybe more.
Interested hearing from anyone who does.
No. Primary difficulties with The Gimp are the lack of 16 bit editing
and color
all, but I really see FF digital, even from Pentax,
as inevitable evolution, regardless of whether the
Semiconductors (i.e. sensors) get MUCH more expensive to produce
than the simple increase in area they occupy. Something like 10x-100x to
produce FF as opposed to APS-sized IIRC.
Paul, I suggest each time you describe the way you took a shot you
insert a word steady somewhere ;-).
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Maybe they're underexposed a bit? This shot was taken in very
dim light. Just a bit of room tungsten lighting at night. But it's
Godfrey, the GIMP 2.3.xxx beta releases indicate that they support
ICC-based color managed workflow. Also there are some words about
16-bit support as well. I am anxiously waiting for GIMP 2.4 to be
finally released. It may be my savior in a way of speaking...
On 2/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL
No. Primary difficulties with The Gimp are the lack of 16 bit editing
and color management. For my work, there's little point to using an
image editor that does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED] editing and color
management. Some folks have found ways around these limitations, but
why struggle
Yes, it's considerably brighter than the actual lighting. Quite a bit colder as
well. But it seemed to look good that way.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/06/07 8:15 AM, Paul Stenquist, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shot
Thanks Bill, Godders and Bob. This is one I overllooked when I first processed
the shots from that day. I wasn't happy with the light. But some burning in and
a BW conversion helped a lot. BTW, I used the BW Green Fotomatic conversion
filter on this one. That's from the set that Peter
Nice one Paul.
I think this shot may lend itself to a slight warm/sepia tone.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The blue channel streaking was reportedly fixed with the last firmware upgrade.
We shall see.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh the under exposed shots are terrible (the K10D is less forgiving
than the D when it comes to
How about Shake Reduction? :-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, I suggest each time you describe the way you took a shot you
insert a word steady somewhere ;-).
On 2/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/07, David Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Photoshop, Elements or otherwise, a 16-bit editior? I seem to
remember that some features are and some features are not? Please
clarify. If not, is your work around to shoot in raw and use raw
editors and then save in what format? Are
Me to.
It works fine on my PZ-1 but at the extreme ends,28 and 105 it hunts terribly.
Move it a MM and its fine.
I had reported this before.
Its on my PZ-1 pretty much permenatly. Its my BW camera and the focal
lentgh is good for 95%
Dave
On 2/5/07, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Good to hear they're finally getting close to 2002 functionality. ;-)
I see no need to fight the tide on this. Want to work on Linux OS?
GIMP and its derivatives are important.
For anyone doing photography and using Windows or Mac OS operating
systems, there are too many upsides to
Yes, that would be in line with modern times...
On 2/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about Shake Reduction? :-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, I suggest each time you describe the way you took a
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:56:58 -0500
Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at this point). Photoshop does this all very close to seamlessly. I
wish there were an OSS solution that would come close. I would look at
it in a heartbeat. Maybe in the 2.4.x version of Gimp, that will get
better.
hi,
For anyone doing photography and using Windows or Mac OS operating
systems, there are too many upsides to Photoshop/Lightroom/other
better developed photo editing tools to be worth wasting time with
The Gimp.
... unless you're a cheap bastard. For many, it's a viable
inexpensive
Mat Maessen wrote:
On 2/6/07, David Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Photoshop, Elements or otherwise, a 16-bit editior? I seem to
remember that some features are and some features are not? Please
clarify. If not, is your work around to shoot in raw and use raw
editors and then save in
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:44 AM, David Weiss wrote:
Okay, naive non-programming/non-electrical engineer question here:
Is Photoshop, Elements or otherwise, a 16-bit editior? I seem to
remember that some features are and some features are not? Please
clarify. If not, is your work around to
Just saw this wonderfully rendered shot. Filter, etc. certainly
produced a terrific image and moment.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bill, Godders and Bob. This is one I overllooked when I first
processed the shots from that day. I wasn't happy with the light. But
some burning in
Godfrey, the GIMP 2.3.xxx beta releases indicate that they support
ICC-based color managed workflow. Also there are some words about
16-bit support as well. I am anxiously waiting for GIMP 2.4 to be
finally released. It may be my savior in a way of speaking...
I've been following this
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My workflow in PS CS2 or Lightroom starts from the RAW file
([EMAIL PROTECTED] capture) and is only rendered to an [EMAIL PROTECTED] RGB
file when I output JPEGs for the web or tell whichever program I'm
using to print ... the 16bit - 8bit conversion is done at
Of course the hacksaw is an extra cost if you buy the A* 85 F1.4
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
For anyone doing photography and using Windows or Mac OS operating
systems, there are too many upsides to Photoshop/Lightroom/other
better developed photo editing tools to be worth wasting time with
The Gimp.
... unless you're a cheap bastard. For many, it's a
Cute shot - the lens does seem to perform pretty well.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 4:29:36 AM, you wrote:
PS K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I ignore it all the time. I have not found it's accuracy to the level
that I require. It seems to have a wider range of acceptable focus
than works for me. So I just focus manually as I always have. My
preference is for a plain matte screen, so the supplied screen is not
too bad for me.
--
Cool shot and a hearty congrats on the success!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 12:13:28 AM, you wrote:
BW A really well-deserved win - that's an excellent shot, and a nice
BW change from the bird-on-twig-with-catchlight cliché.
BW --
BW Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In a message dated 2/5/2007 6:46:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And with a Pentax!!
The Detroit Zoological Society publishes a quarterly glossy for it's 40,000
plus members called Habitat. Each issue has a themed photo contest and at
the end of the year they award a
My god, that's almost obscene.
David Savage wrote:
Speaking of animated .gif's
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Master_GIF-Test.gif
Dave
On 2/6/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'v got the link to work now Mark.
Thanks
Dave
On 2/4/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL
I didn't think these were still available. In the Netherlands and me
without any extra disposable cash. Crap :-(
Frank Wajer wrote:
grab them while you can. 650 euro a piece. I already have both of them, they
are awesome.
They also have some other nice stuff.
Click kleinbeeld and then
On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:00 AM, David Weiss wrote:
Do you find yourself using PS CS2 much since the advent of
Lightroom in
your workflow?
I find I'm doing the vast majority of my rendering work exclusively
in Lightroom now, probably in excess of 90%. What Lightroom does not
offer is layers,
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:41 AM, David Weiss wrote:
Do you know if this subset includes sharpening, curves and levels?
Those and cropping is what I use normally.
Yes, CS/CS2 all support sharpening, curves and levels operations on
full 16bit per channel files. Also layers, color space conversions,
On 2/6/07, David Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote:
I cannot speak for Elements, but both Photoshop CS and CS2 have
extensive 16-bit support. Not all functions are 16-bit ready, but a
very useful subset of them are.
Do you know if this subset includes sharpening, curves and
Or try Picture Window Pro, which has full 16 bit support, full color
management and costs about the same as Elements.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:28:13 AM, you wrote:
AM Poor interface, no appreciable 16 bit support, no colour management.
AM Give it a pass.
AM Photoshop elements is
I struggled with various conversion methods for a while, and this is so,
so easy. With good results, (or maybe I should say goo results), quite
painlessly. Amazing isn't it, (especially for only 8bit software).
By the way, I like the photo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bill, Godders
Dear list
Sine the *ist D and the K10D use different memory cards, I bought a very
nice adapter. It allows the SD card to get concealed inside the adapter.
This makes it possible to use it in the *ist D. I have seen other adapters
that couldn't be used in the camera.
I actually got it in order to
Hi.
I'm a long-time lurker on the group. This is my first PESO posting as I've
retired and now have time to do this sort of thing:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnpoirier/381846004/in/set-72157594521239417/
I'm in the process of setting up my image management system and unpacking
many, many
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a lot Germans seem to read the PDML, I know about 3 active members only?
And those few live in other parts of the country. I tend to agree with
former German chancellor Adenauer who insisted on installing the
;-)
From a 10k race I photographed a couple of weeks ago...
http://www.robertstech.com/run/graphics/pages/7d700259.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have no wish to get rid of my TTL flashes. Not yet, anyway.
So, I keep on using my Metz 45's and 60's as well as smaller Pentax and Metz
flashes.
I dont like flash lioght a lot, so I bounce it off the ceiling or a
refelctor screen.
Shooting at places like this, high SIO values are really
P. J. Alling wrote:
David Savage wrote:
Speaking of animated .gif's
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Master_GIF-Test.gif
On 2/6/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'v got the link to work now Mark.
My god, that's almost obscene.
ALMOST??? Damn, I'm gonna have to try
I was shooting (photographing) some paintball over Christmas. One of
the players saw me in the corner of his eye, turned fired. Took it
in the left hand. If it wasn't holding the lens, paint would have been
all over my DS 50-200.
Not quite combat, I know.
dk
On 2/3/07, Kenneth Waller
Hello John,
Welcome to the list. Your name seems very familiar to me for some
reason. Anyway, very nice shot. I really love the soft colors on the
snow and the fine shadows involved. I look forward to more of your
posts.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 8:35:03 AM, you wrote:
JP Hi.
Well, it is a camera after all.
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
David Savage wrote:
Speaking of animated .gif's
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Master_GIF-Test.gif
On 2/6/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'v got the link to work now Mark.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2007-02-06-kodak-printer_x.htm?csp=34
Looks like the one predicted by my friend in Rochester a couple of
weeks ago.
Struggling photo giant Eastman Kodak is launching a new line of inkjet
printers aimed at luring digital shutterbugs back to Kodak paper. The
Just finished shooting a wedding on Saturday afternoon. Previously I
had been using my AF400T with Lumiquest softener on TTL with the
*istD. For this round, I used the K10D and the AF400T with Lumiquest
Promax Ultrasoft attachment. I used the flash on Auto setting and set
the camera accordingly
I would have thought an 18 naval gun would be longer than 7'!
;-)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: combat photography
You'd have thought 16 would
Yes, it's very good. Experimenting with the various filters is entertaining and
enlightening.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I struggled with various conversion methods for a while, and this is so,
so easy. With good results,
On 2/06/07 12:52 PM, Kenneth Waller, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have thought an 18 naval gun would be longer than 7'!
;-)
That would be an amazing looking gun, wouldn't it? :-).
Even more amazing is PDML's ability to elongate a BB gun pellet into a 7'
long 1.6 ton cannon ball in a
Seems appropriate to me - the guy has to babysit instead of shoot
since he brought a Canon. Nothing wrong with that grin.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 9:35:05 AM, you wrote:
MR ;-)
From a 10k race I photographed a couple of weeks ago...
MR
Well seen and caught! What appears as low sunlight certainly adds to a
pleasing visual impact. Nice exposure, as well.
Glad you came out. ;-)
Jack
--- John Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I'm a long-time lurker on the group. This is my first PESO posting
as I've
retired and now have
Way to go Bill - congratulations!
A really nice image. Nice subject, colors composition.
Well seen captured.
As much as I enjoy my Pentax, its not the equipment, its the operator.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Holy Sureshot, I
Adam McKenty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting Ralf. I didn't know Berlin was considered so provincial.
Nothing to do with provinciality. It's simply far away, at least by our
standards.
if anything, Bonn would be the quintessential small German province
town.
What would you say is the
I think that's the length of the shell...
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I would have thought an 18 naval gun would be longer than 7'!
;-)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007
Intense. Very intense.
thanks, Bob!
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Bob W wrote:
While surfing I came across Tom Stoddart's site again - I haven't
looked at it for a while. Stoddart is an English photojournalist of
the very highest calibre, and you're probably familiar with some of
his
In a message dated 2/6/2007 9:26:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
I'm a long-time lurker on the group. This is my first PESO posting as I've
retired and now have time to do this sort of thing:
As much as I enjoy my Pentax, its not the equipment, its the operator.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
Heresy. Pure heresy.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Wow! Congratulations Bill. Quite a pretty bird.
I hesitate to offer what might be construed negatively, but I might consider
cropping slightly to remove the highlights at the bottom edge and the small
portion of what might be one of the bird's legs.
This image jumps out and grabs you with
Hello John.
I love the light quality and the resulting cool tone pinks and blues.
Tom C.
From: John Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Snow-covered Jack Pine
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:35:03 -0700
I tend to show photos in batches, because of where my head is at the time
and my free time at the time. Then I start feeling all guilty that I am
showing
too many at once and taking up bandwidth and all that jazz.
However, when I look over the total number of photos I've shown since I've
On a related matter -
One of my brothers was stationed on the battleship Iowa for several years.
The Iowa had 3 turrets of 16 guns. The projectile fired weights
approximately the same as a VW bug. Around 2000# IIRC.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL
The big question is will they be compatible with tomorrow's HDTV systems.
Norm
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Its not moot because the thread evolved into
discussion of future usability/performance of
FF vs. DA lenses and having no K mount FF camera today does
not preclude simple discussion of
Welcome John.
Its all about the light.
Hope you worked the scene. I see possibilities of close ups of the snow
covered branches.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: John Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Snow-covered Jack Pine
Hi.
I'm a long-time lurker on the group.
Very nice. I like the blue mood. Good light.
Paul
In a message dated 2/6/2007 9:26:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
I'm a long-time lurker on the group. This is my first PESO posting as I've
retired and now have time to do this sort of thing:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Bob W wrote:
While surfing I came across Tom Stoddart's site again - I haven't
looked at it for a while. Stoddart is an English photojournalist of
the very highest calibre, and you're probably familiar with some of
his photos, but if you haven't seen his website
Ce mardi, le 6 février, à 22h05 sur RTBF La Première:
LES MARDIS DES ARCHIVES : RAYMOND DEPARDON (1980)
Production: Pascale Tison
C'est le photographe et cinéaste, Raymond Depardon, que nous retrouvons
ici en compagnie de Michèle Cédric. Fils de paysans, c'est à la ferme
familiale que Raymond
Great shot Paul.
Expression says it all
Dave
On 2/6/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: PESO: The Greeting
K10D and DA 50-200/4.5-5.6 @ 50mm:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5561054size=lg
I remember whan
Merci Ralf ! :)
Le 06/02/07, Ralf R. Radermacher[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Ce mardi, le 6 février, à 22h05 sur RTBF La Première:
LES MARDIS DES ARCHIVES : RAYMOND DEPARDON (1980)
Production: Pascale Tison
C'est le photographe et cinéaste, Raymond Depardon, que nous retrouvons
ici en
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
