In a message dated 2/2/01 10:16:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion the high point of portrait photography passed many years
ago.
I liked it all Mike, but would you explain the above?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from
In a message dated 2/2/01 11:54:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, a portrait _should_ please the subject.
I agree Bill.
Who else *has* to be pleased? The one who pays my freight, if not the
subject. I only have to be *proud* of my work, that I applied all I
One can use i-escrow. If the other party refuses it, the it becomes risky.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: Todd Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will be there on business, in the Station Square area, next Tuesday/Wednesday.
Anyone want to get together for dinner or show me some place to shoot at night,
if I bring a tripod?
Tiger Moses
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Hi,
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
[...]
shot. The pictures were among the best examples of double exposures I've ever
seen: shots of toreadors on shots of paintings of various ages representing
bulls, sacrifices, ancient women. Strong colors made the rest...
[...]
Sounds like a rally enjoyable
Sid wrote:
But immediately, she's already sold a series of swamp scenes I did a
couple of years ago, based on some 8 x 10 examples I gave her to use.
These photographs are all in 35mm format.
She wants them in sizes ranging from approximately 18 x 24 inches to 30
x 40 inches.
canislupus wrote:
... talk about extreme situations. Here are folks who (like me;)
try to push the MOST speed off a film, to put MOST TCs on a lens
(was it someone's 64/4800mm rig? the UFO=flare shot last year ;)
that was me - I admit! "6400mm, guilty as charged" :^D
2)
Hi all,
Yesterday, I found in a shop an A35-105/3.5 for JP\18,800
(approx. US$160). From what I saw at the Stan's Lens Page,
it has obtained fairly good reputations from PDMLers.
I've got an A35-70/4 and an A70-210/4 to cover the rage.
I've been wondering if I should get one to replace the
- Original Message -
From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr." Subject: Getting' funky with film
choices
PS: A small bit of good news. The AF280T that I thought had
been
stolen in the burglary had just gotten kicked behind other
stuff --
it must have fallen out of the bag. I'm still rather
Can't you simply use AOL as your 'ISP' and then set up a free pop email acct
with someone like crosswinds.net and use something like Outlook?
D
on 2/3/01 10:52 AM, Peter Alling at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that doesn't convince someone to stop using AOL
then nothing will.
--- Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" Subject: Color Neg Film Balanced for
Tungsten
What, if any, color print film is balanced for tungsten?
Anything in 400 or 800 ISO?
Fuji NPL 160:
http://www.fujifilm.com/tcm.html?x-tempest-op=genericContentId=
I tried to view the PUG this AM, and again just now. The Komkon
server seems to be down. I have a call in to tech support.
Hopefully this won't be for too long.
Thanks
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
According to B+H, Portra 100T is available in 35mm.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
Bob W. regarding the dating of Stonehenge and Newgrange, wrote:
Sorry to be so pedantic, but there are already far too many myths
around about Stonehenge and other ancient sites. The facts are far
more interesting.
Not pedantic at all Bob. Thanks for the interesting info, despite it's high
Sid, I've gotten excellent results (IMHO) in getting 16" X 20" prints from
original 35mm images. I have a local lab shoot a 4" X 5" internegative of
the slide and then print from the neg using the slide as a color guide. The
interneg cost approx. $11-12. The cost per print varies with the number
Hmmm. I must be on crack. My first go round at Kodak's website
indicated that the stuff was available in 120 and sheet only.
Now I can't find that page, but the one I am looking at now
definitely lists it as available in 35mm.
Must be another flashback
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
The PUG is back on line.
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
I don't usually find myself defending the use of AOL (in fact, this
may be the one and only time), but I can see why someone would use
it. Here are a couple reasons:
1.) Ubiquitous nodes. Pretty much anywhere you go (at least in the
States) there's a local dial-up number.
2.) Family reasons.
Bill,
I use AOL 5.0 and won't upgrade to 6.0 even with Doug's patch to send plain
text (It looks like a pain in the a__).
To answer your question, I was in Phoenix and Atlanta this week. My AOL
account was a local phone call away in both cases. Very convenient.
And I did need to call !!!
William Robb wrote:
Maybe a dumb question, and WAY off topic, but I can't see a
reason to use AOL, but I knwo there are many on the list who do.
What do they offer?
Thanks
A handy way to raise you blood pressure, mostly.
I can't wait to see the posts on what is good about it.
One of the
I really was just curious. BTW, I still have that AOL version 5
coaster awaiting the first caller. This is the rare last version
that supports plain text email. A must have peice of software
for any AOL subscriber.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/03/2001 09:56, Doug Brewer opined:
Oh, and please, please, do not let this degenerate into another
HTML/plain text war.
Doug
At 9:50 AM -06002/3/01, William Robb caused thus to appear:
Maybe a dumb question, and WAY off topic, but I can't see a
reason to use AOL, but I knwo there are
In a message dated 2/3/2001 11:51:31 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe a dumb question, and WAY off topic, but I can't see a
reason to use AOL, but I know there are many on the list who do.
What do they offer?
Thanks
Bill
Bill-
I elected AOL three or four
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 11:22:11 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I really was just curious. BTW, I still have that AOL version 5
coaster awaiting the first caller. This is the rare last version
that supports plain text email. A must have peice of software
for any AOL subscriber.
Heck, post it on eBay.
On 02/01/2001 12:37, Tiger Moses opined:
At 10:50 AM 2/1/01 -0800, you wrote:
Can I use a simple hotshoe adapter with a PC
connection to plug in my Photogenic Medalight into my
PZ1?
Thanks,
Herbet.
Yes you can, but you can decrease the risk of damage to the Pentax by using
devices designed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To answer your question, I was in Phoenix and Atlanta this week. My AOL
account was a local phone call away in both cases. Very convenient.
AOL is not unique in having nodes all over the US. I use Mindspring (now
part of Earthlink), and can connect from anywhere I
On 02/03/2001 10:19, Ann Sanfedele opined:
I have an AOL account as an emergency backup for $4.95
a month, so I can get to ebay even if my server is down or I'm visiting
someone who has it I
can easily access the email I had forwarded there from my regualr
server. But there are so
many
I guess I should have waited on this. Turns out it's still HTML. Oh
well, back to the drawing board.
Doug
At 11:38 AM -05002/3/01, Doug Brewer caused thus to appear:
Jay O'Brien sent this to the majordomo users list. Thought it might
be of interest here. And I might also take this
Mike wrote:
"Bear in mind that it's possible this is just a rumor. "
REPLY:
It isn't possible just a rumor; its a false rumor. In my previous post I said that it
was almost certainly bullshit. You can cut the almost; since then I've gotten it
confirmed (so have others it seems) that the
Michael Reichmann's site includes a thorough review of the Canon D30,
including a very interesting comparison of the output of that camera to
35mm Provia F100. The film was scanned using a (US$ 10,000?) Imacon
Flextite, then sharpened, etc. The D30 images were manipulated as he
describes,
Does anyone have a "recipe" for Delta 3200 using either T-Max or D-76? I
acquired a couple of rolls of the Ilford film (Ilford is packing two
rolls with its new Multigrade IV Cooltone paper). So rather than buy
more chemistry, I'd like to be able to process it with one of the two
developers I
Canislupus wrote:
"Sorry if somebody already asked this, but anybody knows if there are the
HyP/HyM modes in MZ-S? From a first glance, it seens there are no buttons
for them, but perhaps the AF button on back can be reprogrammed using
Pentax Functions into a IF button, or the green dot button
Absolutely - get it!
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: Takehiko Ueda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piv: 03. helmikuuta 2001 17:36
Aihe: Re: Vs:
"D. Glenn Arthur Jr." wrote:
Anyone out there cross-process Provia?
-- Glenn
I haven't cross-processed Provia, but I did shoot some deep orange
flames with Velvia and then cross-processed the Velvia. The orange
flames printed as a nice bright
Sid,
Congratulations on finding a market for your images. I'm especially interested to
find out there is a market in this part of the world for swamp pictures. I'm gonna
have to spend more time out in the boat (without my rod and reel).
Based on my snip below and the assumption that you're
Hi all;
I recently purchased a 300f4.0 (k) lens from KEH. After having lost several
Ebay auctions, I just couldn't get the bad taste out of my mouth any other
way! Argghhh! That 300m* on Ebay just did not find its way into my
collection. I will be receiving my 300f4.0 in a few days and was
D-76 and ID-11 are virtually identical formulations. They can be
used pretty interchangably.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "PAUL STENQUIST" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentaxlist" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 3, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Delta 3200 Processing
Does anyone have a
This comes from my friend Oren Grad, who is not on the list but is a Pentax
fan of long standing (although he shoots with Leica and large format):
Re that new Nikkor 45 - there's something perverse about a pancake lens
coming from a vendor of dreadnought cameras. There's not a camera in the
Thanks Bill,
That being said, I'm going to load a roll of that stuff in my LX, strap
on the 400/5.6 and the A2X-S and walk down the street to the marsh to
see if I can shoot some ducks. It's a cold, gray winter day here in
Michigan, but I gotta have some fun.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
D-76
I think you know the classical answer to the question already,
so are just "stirring the pot". :)
The easy answers (and those are the only kinds of answers I
know) that satisfy my requirements are:
1. A lens of sufficient focal length to allow a decent
working distance and not cause any of
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
Thanks Bill,
That being said, I'm going to load a roll of that stuff in my LX, strap
on the 400/5.6 and the A2X-S and walk down the street to the marsh to
see if I can shoot some ducks. It's a cold, gray winter day here in
Michigan, but I gotta have some fun.
Paul
I'm in the market to buy a new film scanner in the next month (I'm giving my
S20 to my father so he scan 50 years of family photographs and annotate them
as a digital legacy to all his descendants).
My upcoming bonus at work should be nice enough to afford something better
than an S20.
What do
Dave Weiss writes:
I recently purchased a 300f4.0 (k) lens from KEH.
Congratulations on your purchase. Every original Pentax PK prime
is a masterpiece.
According to Boz's site, the optical formula is 7 elements
in 5 groups while all the subsequent 300 lenses were 7-8
or 7-9. What specifically
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I'd prefer, if anyone on the list is going to use AOL,
that they use an earlier version that supports plain text or consider
employing another email client to interface with the list, as Peder
did.
Hasn't AOL gotten around to making its system
Mike, that is as definitive a description of what a good
portrait lens is as I have ever read.
--Tom
Mike Johnston wrote:
Shel wrote:
What is a "portrait lens?" Can someone define it for me? What
are the characteristics of a good portrait lens?
I suppose by definition it's a lens
Nikon is coming out with new scanners soon, though I don't know if they are
on the market yet:
"A New Generation of Nikon Coolscan Film Scanners:
The Coolscan IV ED, Super Coolscan 4000 ED and Super Coolscan 8000 ED"
http://64.77.49.6/usa_category/category.jsp?cat=7
Maris
- Original
Does anyone actually have a Pentax SMCP Tilt Shift 28mm f/3.5? I can't find
a picture of one anywhere (even the Pentax, BH, and Blue Book sites) and
I'm curious to know what they look like; also whether anyone who's used one
has an opinion about it (as in, worth USD 1200?).
Thanks.
JJ
J. John
Anybody knows this?
With the compensation dial on the left: Is it possible to choose intermediate steps
(e.g.
set it between 2x and 4x to get 3x) or does this not work?
PS: Interesting: When the ASA film speed is set to 800 you cannot choose 1/4x, when it
is
set to 1600 you cannot choose
Try...
http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/
They have a picture.
Cy Galley - editor, B-C Contact!
Bellanca-Champion Club
Visit us at: http://www.bellanca-championclub.com
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject:
Looks like his first time selling something also
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Stanley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Black ME super on eBay!
Hmm... depends on how much of a risk taker you are to send a money order
Nikon has new scanners arriving soon.
http://64.77.49.6/usa_product/product.jsp?cat=7grp=701productNr=9236 see
also the 4000 and the 8000 linked to on that same page.
Good luck,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm in the market to buy a new film scanner in the next month (I'm giving my
S20 to my
Nothing any longer, for me. At one time it they were one of the few
"National" ISP's that had local numbers all over which is great for
traveling. Now there's quite a few more big providers that do the same.
Tom C.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Thanks Jay and Doug. This seems to work for Compuserve too. At least I
think it does you tell me
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
So I'd really like to figure out a way to put a tripod
collar on my FA* 300mm F4.5 lens. I remember someone
out there had one custom-machined, but I can't find the
link to the picture.
I was surfing on the BH website, however, and discovered
that Tokina and Canon both have tripod collars that
Hi
It's true it could be dangerous to use old/un current flashes for this
camera. Anyway, please notice, that the shoe of the PZ-1 is slightly
different from the usual design. There has to be a small rectangular
"cut-away" in front of the metal plate, that goes into the camera hotshoe.
Regards
This lens is on my SuperProgram about 80% of the time. Wonderful
quality, and it balances nicely with a ME II grip . . .
Illinois Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Hi
It's true it could be dangerous to use old/un current flashes for this
camera. Anyway, please notice, that the shoe of the PZ-1 is slightly
different from the usual design. There has to be a small rectangular
"cut-away" in front of the metal plate, that goes into the camera hotshoe.
Regards
Hi JJ
Yes, I have it.
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]P; vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. februar 2001 22:08
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Tilt Shift lens for 35mm
Does anyone actually have a Pentax SMCP Tilt Shift 28mm f/3.5? I can't
On 02/03/2001 13:29, Cy Galley opined:
Cy Galley - editor, B-C Contact wrote:
Try...
http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/
They have a picture.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tilt Shift lens for 35mm
Does anyone actually have a Pentax SMCP Tilt Shift 28mm f/3.5? I
In a message dated 2/3/01 11:51:31 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe a dumb question, and WAY off topic, but I can't see a reason to use
AOL, but I knwo there are many on the list who do.
What do they offer?
Thanks
Bill
Bill, some of us started out with AOL way
In a message dated 2/3/01 11:53:17 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If that doesn't convince someone to stop using AOL then nothing will.
What "that" are you reffering to Peter?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Mike,
All due respect, but I'd be more inclined to believe Pl and Yoshihiko. They both have
a long-standing relationship with the list and have proven reliability (okay, well,
Pl is hit-and-miss at times, but I have faith in him overall).
It seems odd that you demand Pl identify his source,
Hi Dave,
Dave Weiss writes:
I recently purchased a 300f4.0 (k) lens from KEH.
Maybe it is of high quality then.
Perhaps the two extra lenses that were added compared to the
5-5 design of the smc tak were added to correct some
aberrations?
That would be my guess.
I did order the ultimate
In a message dated 2/3/01 1:40:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
That said, I don't know that I would ever miss AOL if I moved to another
server;
I know one: if your "Favorite Places" is nearly as huge* as mine, with all
those websites, saved mail, eBay folder-etc.,
Lately I have been thinking of getting the FA 135 f/2.8, but since it has
recently been discontinued, I'm debating on whether or not to wait for the
replacement, if there is one. Does anyone know if or when there will be a
replacement brought out?
merci,
-paul
In a message dated 2/3/01 3:04:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What is a "portrait lens?" Can someone define it for me? What are
the characteristics of a good portrait lens?
Shel Belinkoff
My 80-200 f/2.8 FA AF was a great "portrait" lens. You could shoot
Discontinued? Where did you hear this? It's still available from B+H,
and listed on Pentax USA's web site.
OTOH, B+H still lists the SMCT 135/3.5 screw mount
The 135/2.8 is a *great* lens, even wide open. I think it may be the
best of my lenses wide-open. It's my favorite portrait lens.
It's been discontinued?
By all accounts, It's a winner. I've considered buying it myself, but I'm saving up
for a 77 and have the length/speed covered with my 80-200/2.8. If it's available and
you see a need/want for it in your photography, grab it. I don't think you'll be sorry.
Doug
At
Hi Bill,
You wrote:
This lens is on my SuperProgram about 80% of the time.
Wonderful quality, and it balances nicely with a ME II
grip . . .
Illinois Bill
It's the same situation as mine (in the near future). I'll
go and try.
Thanks a lot,
Take "Now let's go" Ueda
Hi Raimo,
You wrote:
Absolutely - get it!
All the best!
Raimo
Now is the time to go and get it!!
Thank you,
Take "Where is my Wallet?" Ueda
Take Ueda, Osaka, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.co.jp/hayatama/photo/
-
This message is from the
William Robb wrote:
Ok, Mike, here is where the rubber meets the road.
Prove it. And lets not use a "The sky is pink, I read it on the
net" website. Though if you want to post a few links, that would
be fine also.
As I've stated several times now, it's just a rumor. I can't prove it and I
Gary,
It was a MX Motor Drive that the high bidder can contact him about. Someone
(?)
was looking for a MX motor drive.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Gary L. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Users Group" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February
SETH wrote:
Actually, this is a situation where Stephen Gandy is
uncharacteristically engaging in the sort speculation that Pl
Jensen has become famous for. We are supposed to beleive some
unnamed double secret sources.
I don't think Paal gives a monkey's butt if you believe him.
It
I have one. Nifty. It's not quite as sharp as my SMC K 28/3.5, but then it
has to cover a larger image circle. There is slight barrel distortion, but
you really need a straight edge to detect it at maximum shift. I wish there
was a "no filter" or "UV filter" option among the internal filter
I haven't heard of such a law. If you and I decide not to bid
against each other we still have no control over what others
will pay. So it only affects the price if we are the only
bidders. Shilling (having someone who has no intention to buy
bidding just to drive the price up for the seller)
Hi,
I'm not sure about the other lens's collars, but also
on BH, you will find the Bogen/Manfroto lens "collar"
which looks like a generic solution. I can't tell how
stable it is, but it only cost $10 to try it out. If
it is stable, it only costs about $50.
--- Mark Erickson [EMAIL
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Don't do it in the T-Max.
That's my only advice. :)
Darn. Now I'm tempted to try it in the T-Max:). That Photo Source
Massive Development Chart that someone else pointed me too (sorry,
forgot who, speak up and acknowledge your responsibility here :) calls
for 8.5
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
Darn. Now I'm tempted to try it in the T-Max:). That Photo Source
Massive Development Chart that someone else pointed me too (sorry,
forgot who, speak up and acknowledge your responsibility here :)
That was me. Glad I was useful to someone today, I seemed to irritate
Brian Walsh wrote:
I just shot my first roll of Delta 3200 in 120. It looks like I'll
really need to use EI 6400 for my purposes (shots of people indoors,
with slow lenses--f4.5). I realize that that's well above the film's
true speed--but can anyone recommend a good recipe to give me that
I wrote:
Ilford only recommends microphen and dd-x above 3200, and that's all I
would use.
Oops. It's actually 12500.
I'd still only use the microphen or dd-x...
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentax-discuss-digest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 3, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Delta 3200 Processing
Aaron [who can tell ya all about Delta 3200 in Studional
(good),
Microphen
(really good), Rodinal (good),
Pal, FYI
The rumour started on Stephen Gandy's rangefinder site
"www.Cameraquest.com". Apparently, the President/CEO etc. of Cosina was
asked if the Pentax LTDs were made by Cosina. The fellow's answer was "no
comment ".
I however, have 100% faith that they are indeed all Asahi Pentax made.
Hello,
At 03 Feb 2001 20:52:23 -0600,
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
As I've stated several times now, it's just a rumor. I can't prove it and I
don't necessarily believe it. It was posted by Stephen Gandy on his website,
www.cameraquest.com (in the profile of the 43mm Limited lens,
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 19:07:14 -0800, Steve Larson wrote:
It was a MX Motor Drive that the high bidder can contact him about. Someone
Whoops! Brain fart. :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
In a message dated 2/3/2001 4:30:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/
They have a picture.
I also have some images shot ~through~ the lens, at
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/index.html.
The K 28/3.5 Shift is a pretty good 28mm lens (when used
In a message dated 2/3/2001 8:06:15 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yesterday, I found in a shop an A35-105/3.5 for JP\18,800
(approx. US$160). From what I saw at the Stan's Lens Page,
it has obtained fairly good reputations from PDMLers.
I've got an A35-70/4 and an
A few weeks ago I posted regarding flash options for the LX, and after
severa; people's advice decided to stick with the AF220T I already had.
Of course, that meant that the flash would promptly start malfunctioning...
Now I'm wondering - before buying another flash - if there is perhaps an
In a message dated 2/4/2001 12:47:54 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unlike the filter choices in the K/A
15/3.5 (where one can select "no filter"),
Speaking of the K/A 15/3.5, there's one on eBay right now, billed as a
"PENTAX SMC K 15MM FISH EYE RECTALINEAR" (both
Hi all,
I've got some promising negatives, (Kodak HIE 35mm) save one troubling
aspect-- They're horribly over-developed
I can see on the -2 stop brackets that ta few might be worth trying to
save.
I've used Farmer's to good effect on prints, and I know it was
originally intended for
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, William Robb wrote:
Kodak Portra 100T is available in sheets, and 120, but strangely
enough, not 35mm.
The 35mm version is relatively recent, from what I remember... as in the
past year or so, and maybe less. We sometimes have it in at Don's, but
not always.
:)
chris
-
Hi,
I am currently trying to decide between the Pentax
100mm f2.8 Macro Autofocus SMC-F and SMCP-FA versions.
Optically, are they similar? I can pick up the *F*
version for about $10 less used compared with the *FA*
version.
Thanks in advance,
Barry
Must be like one of those soft lenses, turn a ring and dial in the amount
of distortion you want :) LOL.
Todd
At 12:57 AM 2/4/01 EST, you wrote:
Speaking of the K/A 15/3.5, there's one on eBay right now, billed as a
"PENTAX SMC K 15MM FISH EYE RECTALINEAR" (both distorted and distortionless
;
Isn't Fuji Reala tungsteen balanced? I haven't tried
yet but I was reading CTEIN book and he mentions the
new technology incorporated in Reala that allows it to
show tungsteen and fluorescent lights in their true
colors not the greenish or yellowish common to other
emulsions.
Herbet.
--- Chris
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, herbet brasileiro wrote:
Isn't Fuji Reala tungsteen balanced? I haven't tried
yet but I was reading CTEIN book and he mentions the
new technology incorporated in Reala that allows it to
show tungsteen and fluorescent lights in their true
colors not the greenish or
95 matches
Mail list logo
