>
> There is also a thing called hyper something or other.
> The word hyper scared me off, and I still don't know
> what hyper whatever does.
Probably my favourite feature (also found on the PZ-1p).
If you put the camera in HyperProgram mode then it starts
off in full-program point-and-shoot mod
This one time, at band camp, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 06:17 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> If you want to emphasize the smoke, you need to light the smoke, which
> means less light on the rest of the set. Do you have any way to snoot
> the light?
If it went for the same price then as the aps do today, then maybe...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Gonzalez"
Subject: Re: *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the rain)
If (big IF) Pentax came out with a full frame, 14Mp, K/M compatible
camera next yaar,
There are 3 camera shops in town, but I don't know if any of them rent
equipment. Charlotte Camera, Biggs Camera and Camera World. If you'd like,
I'll give them a call tomorrow and see what I can find out for you.
Nearest looney bin or insane asylum would be here in Gastonia.
Bill
- Origin
I somehow got suckered into doing photography at a friend's wedding in a
little under two weeks (November 1st), in Charlotte, NC.
So now, I've got this wonderful idea that I'll do a couple of posed
portraits of the bride/groom under some non-flash lighting. Looking for
photo floods (halogen ligh
I shot about 45 frames of a church league softball game tonight using manual
white balance and ISO 3200. I'll post some tomorrow, along with some full
size crops. Noise is obvious, but to me no worse than film grain. I was
shooting using a Tamron 75-300/4.0-5.6 in aperture priority wide open and
Did Cotty fall apart again?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: RE: New to the list
> I'll join you.
>
>
>
> "The optimist thinks this is the best
What world is that, Rob? The rich, white, professional, middle-aged or
retired male world?
Nope, I don't think so...
-frank
p.s.: don't tell anyone over at LUG I said that .
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppen
I'll join you.
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*I need a drink*
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusSc
How many shots of "motorway exits" (we crass North Americans call them
off-ramps, but I like "motorway exits" ever so much more, don't you?) does
one require for it to be considered a "collection", I wonder?
Probably not as many as you'd think.
But, to bring this back on-topic, wouldn't that ma
Dear me...
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "David Bellwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please unsubscribe me.
Thanks
David Bellwood
_
STO
Dave & Sid,
What are you scanning 6x7 film with?
Regards, Bob S.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pheeew.:-)
I scanned a chromie for this months pug.
Dave
> Not a chance-- just thought I'd pass on an interesting find.
> My 6x7 is in full use. Love those big negs-- But, interestingly enough,
I've
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Butch Black wrote:
> Hi Guys;
>
> A friend just asked me to recommend a digicam that is shirt pocketable,
> uses compact flash cards, AA's NiMH, writes to RAW, 3X or better optical
> zoom, and is around $400 US. Any suggestions? I suggested the Optios
> 500/550 and S/S4 though
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 06:17 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
My lighting was set up with two heads with 2 stops difference placed
like
subject
|__|
Light Light
Don't worry about Adelheid, just keep an eye on Phyllis.
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Who's going to protect her from tv. He needs an assistant.
>
> Bill
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "pentax
Last year I picked up a cambo 8x10 but it was just too big for the house.
So I dumped it and have been looking for something along the lines
of an old Kodak 2D. Haven't found what I want as yet, but today I got a
bargain on a Nikkor-M 300/9. Nice lens.
So now I "graduate" from 4x5 to 8x10 and ...
FWIW,
I just sold nearly all of my P67 system for the
same price I paid for it 2 years ago ( some went higher, some lower).
So it seems at least the P67 market hasnt gone south
(yet?). I didnt really want to sell it but needed the
cash so to ebay it went. One thing I will admit I didnt
like about
On 20 Oct 2003 at 18:48, frank theriault wrote:
> Certainly, on LUG, the prices for anything Leica are staying up there, if
> For Sale Fridays are any indication. One might have thought that with the
> introduction of the M7, M6 used prices might drop, but that doesn't seem to have
> been the ca
On 20 Oct 2003 at 18:50, Thrainn Vigfusson wrote:
> If you mean the Thordur Hermannsson born on the 21st of November 1955, then I'm
> afraid I don't know him, since he lives on the opposite side of the country. And
> I'm afraid we're not very related. Our nearest common ancestors are Thorarinn
> J
On 20 Oct 2003 at 17:19, graywolf wrote:
> How have you been discussing for months the fact that sensor densities have not
> gone up in the past year? Months ago all you could discuss is that they had not
> gone up in the last few months which would prove nothing as the high-end cameras
> are usua
On 20 Oct 2003 at 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Besides, initial use suggests that for certain forms of photography the
> distortion is very subtle and not objectionable, and electronic
> compensation may mitigate it further. I'd rather see a $250 14mm lens
> or a $1500 full-frame DSLR, but
I know. You're absolutely right Will-iam.
Thanks, keith
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Keith Whaley"
> Subject: Re: File size and capacity ?
>
> > But, that doesn't address his question, which asks why the total number
> > of shots that showed up in his folder exc
Hi John,
John Coyle wrote:
>
> It spreads it out along the top of the frame, Keith. Shutter speed between
> one pair, aperture the next, and so on. Veeerrryyy useful.
Sure sounds like it!
A leetle bit smaller than the LX's data back prints!
keith
> John Coyle
> Brisbane, Australia
> -
Sorry David,
You are stuck in a loop, no getting out.
If you really want to, go here:
http://www.pdml.net/dbrewer/p2.html
You have to do it yourself.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "David Bellwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: M
Hi Brian, welcome to the list.
I too have found wal-mart's CD's to have a very blocky mosaic pattern to
them. If you use Photoshop (full or elements, not LE) Applied Science
Fiction www.asf.com has a set of Photoshop plug-ins that are useful. Digital
GEM can help get rid of the blocky mosaic. thou
>
> Thanks John, but that's the way it's set and still no thumbs or photos.
Try emptying the Internet cache (Tools/Internet Options/General, then
click on "Delete files..." in the Temporary Internet Files.
If that doesn't work then toggle all the settings mentioned below,
exit from IE, restart i
Please unsubscribe me.
Thanks
David Bellwood
- Original Message -
From: "Pat White"
Subject: film vs digital (was *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the
rain))
> Who knows what films will
> be out in five years? Medium-grained 3200-speed, ultrafine-grained
> 400-speed? I'm keeping my film cameras.
>
I can't help but thin
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I will be purchasing an Optio S shortly and want to purchase additional
> memory - 256 mb. Any yeas, nays or suggestions? Vendors to stay away from/or
> recommended?
>
> Kenneth Waller
I have a Sandisk 256MB SD card in mine, no problems. I think I pai
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: File size and capacity ?
> But, that doesn't address his question, which asks why the total number
> of shots that showed up in his folder exceeds the number he said he put
> in there..
> He took 57 shots, up- or downloaded them to
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: *ist 35mm
> Hi!
>
> >The two chassis are not the same size, and share no common parts.
> >What we
> >are seeing is a "family resemblance".
> >As another example, I noticed the other day that a particular Ford
> >automobile seemed
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Ignatiev"
Subject: Re: New to the list
> I'll quote this to the judge at my ticket hearing
> in a couple of weeks -- 80 mph: "Yor Hono(u)r, but this
> is what this has been design for, dammit!".
> If it works and he lets me off the hook (not to
> mention
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Gonzalez"
Subject: Re: *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the rain)
> If (big IF) Pentax came out with a full frame, 14Mp, K/M compatible
> camera next yaar, alot of *istD owners would feel their camera was
> obsolete.
What you are talking abou
- Original Message -
From: "Bucky"
Subject: RE: photographing cigarette smoke
> Sexistic.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
>
> Oh, and these pix are very sexist.
>
I thought they were deliberately trying to damage the baby with evil tobacco
toxins...
They should be arrested a
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens"
Subject: *istD and P.I.M.
> I'm currently printing some *istD photos using P.I.M. via the Adobe PIM
> plug-in and printing on an Epson 925. I am amazed at the color accuracy
> when using the color space recorded in the camera rather than sRGB or
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Re: Autopug confirmation
> I sent in a shot on the 19th and did not get a confirmation.
> Hate to stir this pot. Must be a hassle for those of you
> who maintain it.
When I was maintainer, I preferred to have people email me pri
Who's going to protect her from tv. He needs an assistant.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: New to the list
> On 20/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
> >Adelheid i
> >>>For relatives coming down, I often send them photos of key turn offs to
> >>>follow with a map, as the motorway near me (M25) has resulted in many
new
> >>>roads which a map doesn't show.
> >>
> >>Malcolm, you photograph motorway exits?
> >>I'd like to see your collection ;-)
> >
> >I took a c
Cotty:
For relatives coming down, I often send them photos of key turn offs to
follow with a map, as the motorway near me (M25) has resulted in many new
roads which a map doesn't show.
Malcolm, you photograph motorway exits?
I'd like to see your collection ;-)
I took a couple of pictures of a moto
On 20/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I saw one of these in use today:
>http://www.leica-camera.com/digitalekameras/digilux1/index_e.html
It's supposed to be a lemon from what I've read...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/s
Try scanning your film.
I'll bet, if it's processed "1 hour",
you'll have more dust and scratches than you
can shake 8 sticks at.
Dip and Dunk is supposed to minimize these problems,
but such processing is rare, may be quite a distance from
your house, and more expensive.
-Lon
jmb wrote:
Mark Robe
On 20/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Cotty the Sinner.
The name of my next album. How did you know!
Never mind, Redemption is my middle name.
666,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads
I will be purchasing an Optio S shortly and want to purchase additional
memory - 256 mb. Any yeas, nays or suggestions? Vendors to stay away from/or
recommended?
Kenneth Waller
Bill, try:
Open Internet Explorer
Click on Tools/Internet Options
Click on the 'Advanced' tab
Scroll down to the option 'Show image download placeholders' - check this
OFF
Down one to 'Show pictures' - check this ON.
Down one to 'Smart image dithering' - check this ON.
That should do it!
HTH
John
On 20/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>For relatives coming down, I often send them photos of key turn offs to
>follow with a map, as the motorway near me (M25) has resulted in many new
>roads which a map doesn't show.
Malcolm, you photograph motorway exits?
I'd like to see your collection
Unreadable (covered by slide mount) for slide shooters though.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Stach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Vs: Old lenses, *istD, and the Pentax M(Z)ad-S(cientists)
> Hi!
>
> For
I can't say much, except a deal seems to have been reached. For the sake of
discretion, I don't want to say too much until it's consumated, likely
around November 2nd or 3rd.
I won't be a member of the Brotherhood, but trust me, it will be a Major
Pentaxian Enablement of the 35mm film variety.
It spreads it out along the top of the frame, Keith. Shutter speed between
one pair, aperture the next, and so on. Veeerrryyy useful.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:4
Hi friends,
Would someone of us living in the US be willing to help me with an
Ebay shipping? I want to buy a Domke camera bag (as these are
pretty hard to get in Europe, especially in Czech Republic), but
most of the US Ebay sellers will ship them only in the US. I would
like to as
> And the PDML list is growing for GFM...
>
> César
> Panama City, Florida
Got my email confirmation that my registration was
received.
D60 and D100 are both more than 1,5 years old, but OK, they were quite
alone for a while.
What I was referring to was that the limitations, such as diffractions
limits, signal/noise ratio etc, has made further increasing of the
number of pixels less likely. This has been discussed for quite a
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
> Nice one Ann.
>
> I really got a kick out of the one of the Vesuvio Bakery. I have a shot
> myself when we went there.
>
>
> Gee, was that over two years ago!
>
> Cesar
> Panama City, Florida
So when are you coming back to NY ? :)
Tempis fugiting
Glad you like it...
På mandag, 20. oktober 2003, kl. 21:36, skrev John Francis:
På mandag, 20. oktober 2003, kl. 18:40, skrev John Francis:
Nothing new here - it's just the normal semiconductor technology
progression.
Yep, that was what I was saying in the lines you omitted in you
response. We´ve been discussing th
How have you been discussing for months the fact that sensor densities have not
gone up in the past year? Months ago all you could discuss is that they had not
gone up in the last few months which would prove nothing as the high-end cameras
are usually replaced annually and introduced in time fo
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you wish to accentuate the smoke, pass strong light through it. Strong
> light through snoots can accentuate the smoke without lighting the model.
Thanks for you comments. An excellent idea. My question now is, from where
This one time, at band camp, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:51 AM 10/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Black background is a good idea, but the light is a little flat. Try a
> little more drama in the lighting.
My lighting was set up with two heads wit
I'm only as far as 101.5 8-)
Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> Good explanation.
> I'm learning...day by day...
>
> keith
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Keith Whaley wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, but...
> > > A saved size of 17.3 MB sounds like it didn't save in .jpg but RAW!
> > > Does Photoshop
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, alex wetmore wrote:
> I was just cleaning up my office and came across my Hoya R72 IR
> filter. I've used this a little bit with my Sony DSC-F717 and thought
> I'd give it a try with the *ist D.
>
> From playing around in the house I have to say that it looks
> promissing. My
Hi,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 8:34:00 PM, you wrote:
> There is a Leica digital camera, or maybe more than one, by now. The
> styling is, well, very retro. More like a tall screw-mount body than an
> M-series, really. I suspect that they had to do that to live with
> themselves.
I saw one of
Good for you!
Jim A.
> From: Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:16:24 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: film vs digital (was *ist D makes me cringe (was Pentax 6x7 in the
> rain))
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Mon, 20 O
As an occasional wedding photographer I have never trusted autofocus for
important shots. It is always manual focus. I test all of my equipment a
week before a shoot to make sure sync is correct, synch cords are OK with
the strobe, etc. My film lab was chosen because it has a good reputation
am
> That's one thing that's very cool about film cameras: you "upgrade the
> sensor" by using an improved film, which is why my 30-year-old 6x7 is able
> to produce state-of-the-art, 2003, 160Mb images. Who knows what films
will
> be out in five years? Medium-grained 3200-speed, ultrafine-grained
New list member, finally got signed up to reply to a thread from a week or so
ago:
---
I did one wedding with a Minolta 600si which had trouble auto focusing on the
bride and dad as they came down the aisle. It focused on people behind them
instead. My own fault, since I had turned off the s
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think this "obsolete next year" is more of a mentality than a
technological issue as long as the images are satifactory in the first
place, which I think 6MP is. OTOH, there's no question in my mind that
these *ist D's won't be around as long as any film body. 10 years?
And for the fact that you treated grade school teachers unkindly.
And for the state of your toenails, most days.
And for Frankencameras and all they will let loose upon the world.
Cotty the Sinner. Let us all pray. grin.
Cotty wrote:
Don't apologise! I should be apologising for my demented sense
Good explanation.
I'm learning...day by day...
keith
mike wilson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Keith Whaley wrote:
> >
> > Okay, but...
> > A saved size of 17.3 MB sounds like it didn't save in .jpg but RAW!
> > Does Photoshop do something to an imported image that would account for
> > that massive incre
If anyone on the list plans to visit Iceland, I will be more than happy to
help them plan their trip and to book vehicles and lodgings.
Thrainn
On Monday 20 October 2003 09:11, Bob Walkden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Monday, October 20, 2003, 9:03:34 AM, you wrote:
> > :-)
> >
> > I was just thinking of
Alas, I really doubt I will have the time to put together a web page, since
I've never seem to get around to it, despite (?) working with computers day
in and day out. But I will keep trying.
However, I have seen the PUG and may well contribute to it. I won't make the
November PUG, but I'm prett
>
> På mandag, 20. oktober 2003, kl. 18:40, skrev John Francis:
>
> > Nothing new here - it's just the normal semiconductor technology
> > progression.
> >
>
> Yep, that was what I was saying in the lines you omitted in you
> response. We´ve been discussing this for months :-)
It would have
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul
Stenquist) wrote:
> I've been watching ebay for an M6. So far, no bargains. I'm also a
> regular on the Leica forum. No one is paniced over there. Many have
> digital cameras, but they're not about to give up their Leicas.
There is a Leica
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(John Francis) wrote:
> > If you want to do scripted picture manipulation, my recommendation
> > would be ImageMagick. A very versatile command line tool:
> > www.imagemagick.com
> And you can call it from perl, too. If that can't handle your s
Hi!
For me this feature was one of the main reasons to get an MZ-S.
I hope I can learn a lot from this!
(Also a very nice body overall...)
Thomas
Keith Whaley schrieb:
>
> Well, I'll be dinged!
>
> Thanks for the good info.
>
> keith whaley
>
> John Francis wrote:
> >
>
> > > Raimo Korhon
Well, I'll be dinged!
Thanks for the good info.
keith whaley
John Francis wrote:
>
> > Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > MZ-S prints exposure data on the film between the sprocket holes - easy to
> > > retrieve.
> > > All the best!
> > > Raimo
> >
> > "[B]etween the sprocket holes?
Hi Bob,
> > Chuck the first part of that journey, unless you like traffic and
> > misery, and substitute with M11, A14, M6 then...
>
> that was according to Bill Gates, so it must be correct!
> (Autoroute software).
I use (used) a version of that myself, but would like one with bridge
height
Hi,
Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> Okay, but...
> A saved size of 17.3 MB sounds like it didn't save in .jpg but RAW!
> Does Photoshop do something to an imported image that would account for
> that massive increase in file size?
> The poster said the file size of each downloaded and saved image file, I
If you mean the Thordur Hermannsson born on the 21st of November 1955, then
I'm afraid I don't know him, since he lives on the opposite side of the
country.
And I'm afraid we're not very related. Our nearest common ancestors are
Thorarinn Jonsson (1630 - 1699) and Halldora Thorsteinsdottir (1630
Folder size is 231 MB. It's down to the idea that some images will compress
more than others based on t he image itself. It's something I didn't know
about JPEG. Makes perfect sense now. Thanks list :)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > MZ-S prints exposure data on the film between the sprocket holes - easy to
> > retrieve.
> > All the best!
> > Raimo
>
> "[B]etween the sprocket holes?" I measure that width at about 2.8 mm.
> How does one put ANY info in that small a space?
In t
Two b&w enlargers.
I'm getting a newer one so these older ones need to clear out.
#1 Dejur Versatile Professional. c. 1948 4x5.
Has alignment issues. Requires futzing for a squared-up print.
Fabricated Metal construction. (not cast aluminum)
#2 (forgot the name) made in Czechoslovaki
Agreed, I meant to add that!
graywolf wrote:
Only if it cost $1500. If it cost $6000. Most of them would not be
bothered at all.
Robert Gonzalez wrote:
If (big IF) Pentax came out with a full frame, 14Mp, K/M compatible
camera next yaar, alot of *istD owners would feel their camera was
obso
John Francis wrote:
There are competing demands; to shrink the size of an individual sensor,
and to increase the precision of measurement (roughly corresponding to
bits per pixel). We're not at the technologically imposed limits yet,
but getting beyond the next generation or two is going to re
Raimo Korhonen wrote:
>
> Hi!
> MZ-S prints exposure data on the film between the sprocket holes - easy to retrieve.
> All the best!
> Raimo
"[B]etween the sprocket holes?" I measure that width at about 2.8 mm.
How does one put ANY info in that small a space?
keith whaley
> Photos at http://p
Okay, but...
A saved size of 17.3 MB sounds like it didn't save in .jpg but RAW!
Does Photoshop do something to an imported image that would account for
that massive increase in file size?
The poster said the file size of each downloaded and saved image file, I
assume on his computer, was between 1
Hello. Has anyone compared these two lenses with regards to sharpness
and contrast. Thanks.
Previously written;
The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
about
> 1.9 - 3.02.
>
> C onfused ry
JPEG compression is not, to my understanding, a static thing. For instance a
image with a large expanse of sky should save smaller then an image with
lots of fine detai
Thanks, Bob.
I have saved that mail for later. :-)
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: "Bob S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: OT: USA Inters
Well if you can vouch for all the pictures, what's the problem? :-)
The predicted capacity of 57 shots is assuming that all the pics will be
full size.
Check the total number of megabytes for all the images. If it's more than
256 Mb, I'm at loss...
Jostein
-
Pictures a
Yep!
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: File size and capacity ?
>
>
> Bill Owens wrote:
> >
> > > The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
> > > about
Hi!
MZ-S prints exposure data on the film between the sprocket holes - easy to retrieve.
All the best!
Raimo
Photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
- Original Message -
From: Dave Miers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:09 AM
Sub
Each.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: File size and capacity ?
>
>
> Bill Owens wrote:
> >
> > > The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
> > > a
No, he told the camera 'supposed' to have capacity for storing 57 shots,
then it actually stored 101 pix. It happened to me too, with different
cards, different figures and more or less same 1:2 ratio between calculated
pictures and true capacity.
Dario Bonazza
Keith Whaley wrote:
> But, that do
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Genealogy is a very small subset of genetics, if it can actually be
considered
> related at all. One is social science, the other is very basic biological
science.
Absolutely.
Besides, genealogy generally follows family names. I
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Bill Owens wrote:
> > > The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
> > > about 1.9 - 3.02.
> > >
> > > C onfused ry
> >
> > And when these same files are opened in Photoshop, they show 17.3 MB.
>
> EACH?
Photoshop shows the mem
Bill Owens wrote:
>
> > The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
> > about 1.9 - 3.02.
> >
> > C onfused ry
>
> And when these same files are opened in Photoshop, they show 17.3 MB.
EACH?
> Bill
keith whaley
But, that doesn't address his question, which asks why the total number
of shots that showed up in his folder exceeds the number he said he put
in there..
He took 57 shots, up- or downloaded them to his computer and now his
folder contains 101 images.
Where did the extra images come from?
keith wh
Hi!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:34:08 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok here are the facts:
* Camera - *ist D
* CF card - Lexar 256 MB 12X
* Camera shows 57 available shots when card is empty and the camera
is in
best (***) JPEG mode.
* I filled up the card until it the camera showed 0 availabl
Jpg compression varies depending on the content of the picture. Lots of
areas of continuous tone compress far better than something with lots of
detail or lots of grain/noise for example. The camera doesn't know in
advance how small it will be able to make the files, so assumes that
they will all
> The Computer shows the files to vary in size by as much as one MB from
about
> 1.9 - 3.02.
>
> C onfused ry
And when these same files are opened in Photoshop, they show 17.3 MB.
Bill
Welcome to the world of jpeg. Compression varies depending upon the picture.
Large monotone areas compress more than areas with a lot of small detail. If you
compare the photos to their compressed sizes you will see what I mean.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok here are the facts:
* Camera - *ist D
I'll quote this to the judge at my ticket hearing
in a couple of weeks -- 80 mph: "Yor Hono(u)r, but this
is what this has been design for, dammit!".
If it works and he lets me off the hook (not to
mention the $200 ticket), I'll even agree with
the "low-cost option" part.
mishka
> Highway Syst
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
