On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:18 PM, William Robb wrote:
On Aug 8, 2005, at 4:50 PM, William Robb wrote:
Is an apple better than an orange?
Would you change your answer if the apple was rotten?
No. I'd prefer the orange in any case (keeping in mind that my
personal preference for oranges has nothing
Thanks Boris (again) :-)
It's the same one you've seen yesterday... i didn't change anything
On 8/9/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for a typo in spanish (if there is any) in the name :)
This was shot with my new baby SMC M 35mm F/2.8 that i've got just
yesterday
I Like this one very much
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=111
On 8/9/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/7/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/6/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
All my color photos are from Sunday morning. It was
On 9/8/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.nrvtoday.com/content/view/650/56/
It whined at me for not being a subscriber.
I had to paste the URL into Google and look at the cached version.
Interesting, it let me straight in. It's possible I may have visited the
site before
From: Jack Davis
Esthetics apply only until displaced by emotions.
The decisions then made in framing chance elements,
becomes the art.
Whatever does that mean? Are the decisions the art or
is the art the art?
Regards,
Gautam
On 8/8/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
Except for Cotty, almost everyone can be a bit of an Adam Henry at
times... ;-)
I had to Google that one.
Please call me Adam.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 8/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I do have ~some~ friends on this list, Cotty!
Mark!
(no I mean, er I don't mean, er i mean, er i don't mean, er)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Cotty wrote:
You see a big butt. I see a Volvo.
And a Leicaphile would see the bokeh on the Volvo.
On 8/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, when you get right down to it, Fine is an adjective and Art is a
noun. So is Rubbish.
However, don't ask me what Fine Art is (as opposed to any other type
of art. Now that I think of it, don't ask me what Art is, as I have
no
On 8/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've got a couple of beer in the fridge.
You could all come over to my place...
Love to; it's a bit of a drive from San Jose, however.
Do you know the way?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
On 8/8/05, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, that's what I really want, but it won't just fit on any old camera,
right? Unless you really bring out the tools... Has anyone tried that? I
mean, modify other bodies so that the LX viewfinders will fit.
Har!!!
Hi!
Thanks Boris (again) :-)
It's the same one you've seen yesterday... i didn't change anything
You got me, dude :-).
--
Boris
In continue of the previous photo, that was taken with the SMC M 35 MM
, here are some more :-)
(i wish i'd open the diaphragm some more to make the B/G not to be that sharp)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/August08_TelAviv/94510028_G.jpg
Here is one with Takumar 135 2.5
[...]
On 8/9/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for a typo in spanish (if there is any) in the name :)
This was shot with my new baby SMC M 35mm F/2.8 that i've got just
yesterday (MANY THANKS TO BORIS)
I have no idea whether anyone is looking for one. Adorama has a used
15mm/3.5 lens for $774.
Tom Reese
Michael Spivak wrote:
In continue of the previous photo, that was taken with the SMC M 35 MM
, here are some more :-)
(i wish i'd open the diaphragm some more to make the B/G not to be that sharp)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/August08_TelAviv/94510028_G.jpg
That is one beat up
Beautiful camera. Is it Leica thread mount?
Paul
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ok so I should read these things. It ended without a bid. So it
still ended for less than I would have expected.
P. J. Alling wrote:
In case anyone is interested this camera, probably the most
The Volvo was actually the one thing that I didn't like about this
shot, until others focused on the heiny :-). I actually considered
photoshopping the Volvo out of there, but I got lazy.
Paul
On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Gautam Sarup wrote:
Cotty wrote:
You see a big butt. I see a Volvo.
Why disappointed?
I mean, what is it about the image you don't like?
Or is it an overall thing, where you just can't make up your mind if you
like the lens or not?
It's just it's VERY not sharp and i can really see the difference in
the quality between the 50 or 35mm and this one...
At the local collector's club auction this past Memorial Day
a complete Ektra outfit went for about ... wait ... memory failing ...
was it $5k or $10k. Anyway, a bunch. All as new in boxes.
Really a nice outfit.
Collin
Nope. Not a thread mount. This is the first google result:
http://www.cameraquest.com/ektra.htm
Very nifty camera, indeed.
On 8/9/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful camera. Is it Leica thread mount?
Paul
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Ok so I should
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=111
You would, wouldn't you? And yes, that is Amita having
ANOTHER drink. g
Yes, to make my total for that evening...a whoppingtwo. (Or was it
three?) VBG
Nice job with the fisheye!
Amita
No problems at all, I like simple presentations without too much
clutter or razzel dazzel.
Dave
On 8/9/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I am curious
about is whether any of the folks on this list have difficulties
viewing the pages I present.
Godfrey
snip
Furthermore, I would suggest that my 'derisive attitude' has no bearing on
the merits or perceived quality of my own photographs
Yeah, I agree. I was chewing on that since I read Shel's post.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Splittin
There have been some threads on low light shooting lately. I just came over
this article
http://194.100.88.243/petteri/pont/Photography_lessons/h_Lesson_7/a_Availabl
e_light_situationals.html
at Petteri's Pontifications titled In A Jazz Club With No Flash.
Very to the point. As I read it, it's
SAD NEWS!!
PENTAX announced today that prices of 67II and 645II and all medium format
lenses will grow from 21st September.
See Japanese site.
David
Michael,
to me, the backgroud is OK and part of the image. I like the framing ou
chose, with that big nothing in the lower right corner, it's one of the
pictures where I think everything in the frame is at it's correct place.
Very nice, and of course a cool scooter!
Pancho
Michael Spivak
Simply a first class photo.
How bout the title Dancing with Seagulls? ;-)
In my mind thats what the people in centre do.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
frank theriault wrote:
However, don't ask me what Fine Art is (as opposed to any other type
of art.
It's what the F.A. stands for in certain university degrees.
ERNR
always happy to help
What was the name of the 35mm camera that also featured interchangeable
backs like the Ektra?
Jim A.
At the local collector's club auction this past Memorial Day
a complete Ektra outfit went for about ... wait ... memory failing ...
was it $5k or $10k. Anyway, a bunch. All as new in
It's what the F.A. stands for in certain university degrees
You mean the Pentax FA lenses are not Fine Art lenses!
BG
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Great Expectations
frank theriault wrote:
However, don't ask me what Fine Art
Another great flash system was used by the inventor of flash, Doc
Edgerton. He once took a picture of Cambridge, MA at night from a
plane. The power was so great it melted the giant quartz xenon tube he
had made for that purpose. The tube and the picture are on display down
the hall at MIT
Kodak apparently created their own locking thread mount. I've never seen
one in person but there are features on supported by the Kodak mount
that are very different from the Leica.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Beautiful camera. Is it Leica thread mount?
Paul
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:36 AM, P. J.
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke, but *that's* a big plane! Boeing C-17. Waiting for air
crew to
On 9/8/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
That shot looks like a prime candidate for an alternate caption
contest! Any takers?
This keyless entry sucks...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Little pig, little pig, let me come in!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 8:45:03 AM, you wrote:
C On 9/8/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
That shot looks like a prime candidate for an alternate caption
contest! Any takers?
C This
Mark Roberts wrote:
That shot looks like a prime candidate for an alternate caption
contest! Any takers?
British shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missile fails to work over long
distances?
S
Cool pic. The crew doesn't have a chance. Nail em Cottster!
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke, but *that's* a big plane!
After heroic submarine rescue, door must be cut off plane to free British
flight crew.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another day at the office
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:53:20 -0400
Cotty [EMAIL
Size does matter
rg
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke, but *that's* a big
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Another day at the office
On 9/8/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
That shot
What was the name of the 35mm camera that also featured interchangeable
backs like the Ektra?
Jim A.
There was a Mamiya single-lens RF that did.
Andre
Thanks for the feedback, David!
Godfrey
On Aug 9, 2005, at 4:32 AM, David Savage wrote:
No problems at all, I like simple presentations without too much
clutter or razzel dazzel.
Dave
On 8/9/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I am curious
about is whether any of
Various Zeiss Ikon models (I think the Contarex or Contaflex)
supported interchangeable backs. Also, in a more modern era, Rollei
made a 35mm SLR system with interchangeable backs ... the 3003? or
something like that.
Godfrey
On Aug 9, 2005, at 7:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was
Please... Let me come too!
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
That shot looks like a prime candidate for an alternate caption
contest! Any takers?
However, don't ask me what Fine Art is (as opposed to any other type
of art. Now that I think of it, don't ask me what Art is, as I have
no satisfactory, all-encompassing definition.
That's easy. Fine art is very expensive and usually done by some old dead
guy. :)
They teach courses on that
- Original Message -
From: Marco Alpert
Frankly, it seems to me that there are some of the unsual assumptions
here about what exactly constitutes fine art photography (as a
category - quality evaluations aside). Whose idea of fine art? As
opposed to what other kind of art? (This
Warning - Juvenile politically incorrect joke follows...
Q: What do you call a man with no arms or legs hanging on the wall?
A: Art
Tom C.
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Great Expectations
Date: Tue,
The Volvo was actually the one thing that I didn't like about this
shot, until others focused on the heiny :-). I actually considered
photoshopping the Volvo out of there, but I got lazy.
I like the picture Paul. A nice intimate moment between friends. Sure it
could be improved or ruined by:
No way to control this, I know, but I suspect it would
be revealing if there were some way to control image
critiques, wherein any who would care to, would rate
or grade an image prior to reading what others think.
Suspect there would be much guessing as to how others
might rate it. The real
Powell Hargrave wrote:
Please... Let me come too!
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
That shot looks like a prime candidate for an alternate caption
contest! Any takers?
Yeah.
I send the shot to my wife, and all she said, Cotty has a wonderful job!
Got any comments, Cot? ;-)
alternate caption
You locked the keys where?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another day at the office
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Warning - Juvenile politically incorrect joke follows...
Q: What do you call a man with no arms or legs floating in the water?
Bob
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 9, 2005 2:04 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Great
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611289
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Well that DOES explain the border xing thingy last month.LOL
Seriously, its a good portrait shot with some nice
Powell Hargrave wrote:
The Volvo was actually the one thing that I didn't like about this
shot, until others focused on the heiny :-). I actually considered
photoshopping the Volvo out of there, but I got lazy.
I like the picture Paul. A nice intimate moment between friends. Sure it
could
Warning - Juvenile politically incorrect jokes follow...
Q: What do you call 5 men with no arms or legs and one woman floating in the
water?
Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob and Ann
Q: What do you call a man with no arms or legs at the front door?
A: Matt
Christian
- Original Message -
From:
It's ArtSpeak! And a good example, too.
http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/Artsp.htm
http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/FebArtspeak.htm
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Gautam Sarup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jack Davis
Esthetics apply only until displaced by
Children s ChorusMrs. Wilson, Mrs Wilson, Can Billy come out and
play Baseball?
Mrs. Wilson Children, you know Billy doesn't have any arms or legs.
Children s Chorus That's all right Mrs. Wilson, we want him to be
second base.
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Warning - Juvenile politically
Hah! Easily a third of the people posting here would love it
if you could put one of those TV obscurers such as a
rectangle of badly out-of-focus mottled gray, over the offending part.
Gasp!
I don't think so. Based on my reading of the thread, I'd say at most one
person might have been
On Aug 9, 2005, at 12:13 PM, Bob W wrote:
... I also think it detracts from the picture, which captures a
nice moment, but
I have no objection in principle to looking at a woman's nether
regions. No
sir.
I presume this means you have no objections in principle to looking
at men's nether
Need advice, gang.
My wife has set up a bird feeder that is the most popular thing (for birds)
since day-old bread. Every time I try to approach with my camera on monopod,
though, off they fly. I don't have time to wait for them to get used to me. But
I can shoot them in the mornings from our
I think Bob is right. But, on the other hand, the very fact that this tiny
heiny is a distraction may say something about the way we react to body parts.
It seems that if we were not programmed to react in a certain way to a
bent-over woman, it wouldn't distract??? If she were facing forward,
I assume you're going to be using a fairly long lens? That flash isn't going to
be powerful enought to have much affect on the exposure outdoors. I'd try
shooting at ISO 400. Set exposure manually to one stop under a spot meter
reading on the bird feeder at as large an aperture as possible.
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 10:38:53 +0100, David wrote:
Here's my problem:
For my business (read hobby) I process 1500-2000 jpgs from one day into
web galleries and most of the images need to be rotated. Before I switched
to CS2 I used Photoshop's file browser to rotate the images so when the
Warning - Juvenile politically incorrect joke follows... I can't help it...
Q: What do you call a man with no arms and no legs water skiing?
A: Skip
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Great
It seems that if we were not
programmed to react in a certain way to a bent-over woman, it
wouldn't distract??? If she were facing forward, the
composition would apparently be okay???
No, not as far as I'm concerned. It's not the botty, or the fact that it's a
woman, it's the compositional
Zeiss Contaflex and Contarex come to mind.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: OT- Kodak
Hope you don't get bored with my rock images.
Positive feedback on previous photos, has made me hungry for more feedback
So, you have only yourself to blame ;-)
The name of the band is King Midas. Still from Malakoff Rockfestival.
This time I've made my first serious(?) attempt to convert a
Thanks for all the suggestions, all of you!
Oh my god, in the end, I was urged to use my digital camera instead
(limited to focus of 35mm eq.), because there was no time.
Anyway, the results are here:
http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/caroline/index.html
The vertical lines are not
On 9/8/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yeah.
I send the shot to my wife, and all she said, Cotty has a wonderful job!
Got any comments, Cot? ;-)
Very occasionally it's boring as hell. It's always sweaty. It's 30,000
miles a year in the car. It's lunch on your lap while driving. It's as
On 9/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, we've probably milked this for all it's worth.
Oh for goodness' sake Paul, you *must* be joking. This is the PDML.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
This is a nice shot, IMHO. I like the haze (adds perspective), I love the
colours, and I do like the general composition. But I dislike the sky in top
of frame, distracting, doesn't add anything to the image.
Emotionally, it makes me feel humble towards Mother Nature.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
Andre,
Thanks for your kind attention.
I have been trying to contact Kennedy's but I am getting the emails
returned. Is there any other option?
Thanks again,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: segunda-feira, 8 de Agosto de 2005 22:49
Para:
Paul, that pic is simply outstanding. Thanks for sharing.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Two weeks to the Dream Cruise and traffic is building on Woodward
Avenue. Must have been several thousand enthusiast type cars of various
genres out tonight. In two weeks there will be 50,000 or so. But there
Bob W wrote:
It seems that if we were not
programmed to react in a certain way to a bent-over woman, it
wouldn't distract??? If she were facing forward, the
composition would apparently be okay???
No, not as far as I'm concerned. It's not the botty, or the fact that it's a
woman, it's
Forgot about the Rollei. I considered getting one of those, but they were
pretty expensive.
Jim A.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:03:51 -0700
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT- Kodak Ektra Sold on eBay.
Thanks, Tim. I did try cropping the sky off, but didn't like the loss
of finality to the mountains in the rear. It lost the perception of
the size of the mountain because you couldn't see the top.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 2:44:46 PM, you wrote:
TØ This is a nice shot,
Hi Tim
a big advantage of digital cameras versus analog for me is the freely
changeable iso setting.
I had ISO 200 film in both bodies at the Swiss national holiday to take
photos of fireworks,
when I saw these friends with their Chinese lanterns. Of course the film was
to slow in the
night for
Cotty wrote:
On 8/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, when you get right down to it, Fine is an adjective and Art is a
noun. So is Rubbish.
However, don't ask me what Fine Art is (as opposed to any other type
of art. Now that I think of it, don't ask me what Art is, as
Hi Tim
I liked the Rock festival shots you showed before.
I do not see what the artificial grain would be good for here.
The photo seems to be to bright as well. I do not like this b/w
conversion...
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Vic
I do not think that the house is shown in a good way overall.
Inside it is much too crowded with some things laying around and the photos
have a yellow cast.
The outside shoots are not a lot better.
sorry for my harsh critic.
greetings
Markus
Anyway, the results are here:
I guess since Joe sounds sure about the powerfullness of his flash,
it is probably not _that_ far, so he can still use it.
Joe,
I don't know the exact answer to your original question (I hope somebody
will respond soon).
The manual says that with P-TTL it uses multi-segment metering (with
Hi Paul
Being one of the last to respond, count me to the ones who like the content
of your photo a lot despite some understandable shortcomings in the
composition.
greetings
Markus
Sorry, I forgot. We could digress into a Volvo discussion. Has the
brand suffered since Ford acquired it? Do white Volvo wagons retain
their value better than black sedans?
Paul
On Aug 9, 2005, at 5:22 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 9/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, we've
Thank you, Gonz.
On Aug 9, 2005, at 6:15 PM, Gonz wrote:
Paul, that pic is simply outstanding. Thanks for sharing.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Two weeks to the Dream Cruise and traffic is building on Woodward
Avenue. Must have been several thousand enthusiast type cars of
various genres out
Cotty wrote:
On 8/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've got a couple of beer in the fridge.
You could all come over to my place...
Love to; it's a bit of a drive from San Jose, however.
Do you know the way?
Seems so -- he got there
Thanks Cotty. And thanks to all who responded to this thread, both
negative and positive.
I frequently shoot with wide lenses on the street. In fact, the 16-45
is my most common choice, followed closely by the 35/2. I do like to
use a long lens from time to time. It is an effective way of
- Original Message -
From: keithw
Subject: Re: PESO: Great Expectations
Who can find unwanted suggestiveness in a set of wrinkled shorts stuffed
with someone's behind, who just happens to be a woman?
Un-damned-believable!
Interestingly, none of the people whose posts I read
William Robb wrote:
I see this as a case of if you repeat a lie often enough, it somehow
becomes the truth.
OK. Let's test that out.
Bill's a great photographer. Bill's a great photographer. Bill's a great
photographer. Bill's a great photographer. Bill's a great photographer.
I don't think it's working...
Tom C wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I see this as a case of if you repeat a lie often enough, it somehow
becomes the truth.
OK. Let's test that out.
Bill's a great photographer. Bill's a great photographer. Bill's a
great photographer. Bill's a great
The Takumar Bayonet is not know for being a stellar performer. Some
like it but the general consensus is
that it's a dog. Some might attribute this to a certain amount of
snobbery, but I've learned to believe in the wisdom
of the list, in most cases.
Michael Spivak wrote:
In continue of
No we don't want to buy any cookies
Butch
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke,
Bill is correct. I can't recall anyone who said specifically that they
were offended by the woman in the middle. I misinterpreted a comment
that included the word offensive.
Another may have said that the shot was in some way objectionable,.
again without being very specific about the nature of
You have to give it time.
On Aug 9, 2005, at 8:39 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think it's working...
Tom C wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I see this as a case of if you repeat a lie often enough, it somehow
becomes the truth.
OK. Let's test that out.
Bill's a great photographer.
Former cameraman play 'chicken' with jumbo jet.
On 8/9/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is
P. J. Alling wrote:
The Takumar Bayonet is not know for being a stellar performer. Some
like it but the general consensus is that it's a dog.
He didn't say he was using a Bayo Takumar.
He said Takumar 135 2.5. I interpreted that to mean the
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2.5/135 like I
I went to the Studebaker museum in downtown South
Bend, IN over the weekend while on a trip through IN
and OH. I've always liked the Avanti, and I thought
this photo came out rather well.
http://jon.beigetower.org/misc/midwesttrip/60v6/avanti.jpg
LX, M50/1.4 (I forget what f-stop it was
He said Thanks Boris, maybe I'm jumping to conclusions, but that's what
Boris had, and I have both the SMC Tak and the SMC Pentax version of
this lens and haven't seen anything to be disappointed about by either
of them.
keithw wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
The Takumar Bayonet is not know for
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: PESO: Great Expectations
I don't think it's working...
Its not working.
William Robb
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke, but *that's* a big plane! Boeing C-17. Waiting for air
crew to pop out for a chat. Looks like
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
