Thanks to all who have commented so far. I took some of your advice and
made this conversion of the Drummer shot:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/drummer2.html
Bit of a crop, converted to black white. What do you think?
Original: http://www.neovenator.com/special/drummer.html
John Celio
I use the A*300 f4 it's a great lens, but it has a very long focus
throw, (you can't expect to change from closest focus to infinity
quickly), and it's closest focus is none to close, about 13 feet. On
the other hand it's not a lot larger than the smc P 135mm f2.5 with the
lens hood mounted
So, I still don't know the true voltage and current specs for the
hotshoe,
but at least I know it works with my old higher-voltage Sunpak flash.
I'm
both surprised and delighted.
The entire flash voltage issue is an invented one.
I have used my istD with a very old Metz 60 CT-2, both with
Oh my GOD! NOT KEN ROCKWELL, AIEEEeee.
Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
Yes, I read about that as well.
For some reason, however, I can't go to that place.
I can go to http://www.nikon.co.uk/press_room/.
However, can't go to download after that and can't see
download anywhere on that page.
Your idea of not much larger is certainly a bit different than mine,
Peter. You might want to double check the figures over at Boz's site.
I've had both lenses at the same time, and the A*300 is seemed quite a bit
bigger than the K135/2.5 ...
As for its greatness, well, we'll just have to
right! let's pretend not to know we know they're only
pretending. then one day they'll give the game away
and we've have 'em where we want 'em. evil laugh
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:22 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sorry about that sweep.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
No goats about it, No curses, no ivy, no whining. Chicago's best ball
club does what the cubbies never will do. Not just a win, but a sweep!!!
(Sorry for the outrageously OT post, but I waited all my life for
this:-). Silly, isn't it :-))).
Paul
You've managed to put your own stamp on a landscape.
frank theriault wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
Wonderful pictures. Especially the second lot.
Also, they downloaded all right on 50.6 Kbps
dial-up.
Do you fix a focus and keep shooting or do you
fiddle with the lens everytime?
Cheers,
Gautam
-Original Message-
Hi!
Finally, a few pics up. Sorry - 18 pics on this page, not
OTOH... if one would take an EOS 5D (as way of example because it's twice
the MP), and put a *high quality Canon* lens on it that is equal in focal
length (crop factor considered) and aperture, to what is on the *ist D, and
take a photo, side-by-side, both tripod mounted... all things
I said the lenses were the same length when you have a lens hood mounted
on the K135 f2.5. The hood I use is the one from the SMC Takumar version
of the same lens. I've found the A*300 to be very good optically, it's
not great from that standpoint, very good though. When you take into
account
On 27/10/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Doesn't your 1D have a 1.3 crop factor as opposed to the istD's 1.5.
Everything equal your viewfinder image would be noticably larger than
the istD's. (Yeh, I know you know this, Cotty, but I figured it would
not be obvious to everyone who
On 27/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nice pics, Cotters. Love the subtle muted Oxford colour.
Thanks John. Appreciated.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 26/10/05, Gianfranco Irlanda, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well done, well done...
Ciouououaoauaoauou Gianco!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 26/10/05, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks for taking the time to put them together and sharing them with
us.
Yo Bruce, pleasure.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 27/10/05, Gautam Sarup, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wonderful pictures. Especially the second lot.
Also, they downloaded all right on 50.6 Kbps
dial-up.
Good to know Gautam, many thanks.
Do you fix a focus and keep shooting or do you
fiddle with the lens everytime?
Fiddle fiddle fiddle -
G'day All.
Thanks to all for the comments on my first PESO.
Kenneth. The leaves on the LRH side. I tried to move to the left, but I
lost the background. I couldn't break them off due to the fact that the
missus would have kicked my arse.
Jack. The sharpness was straight out of the *ist Ds on
Also i have been happily using my old Nissin 340T (190V trigger voltage)
with my *istD. Nice to know that people at Pentax (at least Mark...)
thinks it safe too !
Niko
I've tried again to set the custom
function 'F stop other than A' and get
the same message each time. No card in
Camera. If OK is pressed again -- nothing.
Don
By the way I sold my very first Pentax,
an ME Super in beautiful condition, on
eBay last week -- and a P30 as well. I
have one
G'day Barry,
Shots taken using the *ist D with DA16-45 mounted on a Manfrotto 055.
Converted the images from RAW to.tif. I then started up PTGui
http://www.ptgui.com/ which is a front end for the Panorama Tools
application. http://www.path.unimelb.edu.au/~dersch/
Upload the files, enter the
LOL
On 10/27/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any opinions on these 2 lenses
Yes
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Schork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A* 200 f2.8 ED versus A* 300 f4
I'm considering the A* 200 f2.8 ED and the A* 300 f4 for use on my
ROTFL
Thanks Bill.
Dave (still chuckling)
On 10/27/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Ivu
William Robb
I'm with everyone else Barry. Very nicely done.
Maybe think about cloning out the white section in the top right corner though.
Dave
On 10/26/05, Barry Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Folks,
Since it is common for folks to post photos, I've put one of my own new
images up. This came off
It was an entertaining Series. One of the best I've seen in a while. I do
hope they get some better umpires for the next one.
Enjoy your celebration Paul. You Chicagoans waited long enough for it. Is
there room on that Sox bandwagon for all the Cubs fans?
Tom Reese
No goats about it, No
I can see the difference in my *ist D prints from the FA 35/2 vs. the
DA16-45/4. The latter show excellent resolution in 12 x 18 size, the
former are superb. Wearing my most powerful reading glasses and
examining the prints at a distance that is far closer than that from
which they would
A true Cub fan would never hop on, but some of the younger ones and
some of the Uppies who are Cub fans only because it's trendy will
conveniently convert. When the Cubs made the last round of the
playoffs a few years ago, bars on the south side of Chicago were giving
out free beers every time
i like the LowePro Rover series. an Orion AW would also work.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bag enablement (correction)
While on this topic, I'm also in the
For some reason, I want to like it.
The problem is the composition. It is too centred to be dramatic, and to off
centre to be harmonic. To me it looks like you have tilted the camera
slightly to the right. This takes part of the drama away.
There is also something with the proportions. Because of
I had read about the characteristics of the load before I did this. 2.1Amps
is way more than enough, I dont know why they would design theirs for 3A,
unless they intend to use the same supply for other bodies not yet released,
i.e. 645D.
... or bodies that can charge batteries.
Okay, I found a partial answer -- in case anyone else was also wondering. I
contacted Pentax-USA tech support, and spoke to a gentleman named Mark. He
claimed that although he didn't remember the exact voltage specs, that they
were impressively high in his opinion -- on the order of at least
knarF does nature with an urban twist (bad pun intended g).
I likes it.
Dave
On 10/27/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so
And here I thought sports fans in St. Louis were bad. What the hell
was I thinking?
On 10/27/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A true Cub fan would never hop on, but some of the younger ones and
some of the Uppies who are Cub fans only because it's trendy will
conveniently convert.
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Ivu
Thanks Bill, best laugh of the day.
There's more. Too bad they kicked
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 08:38 PM, Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
what is the source of this news ?
Is it Official ?
I am curious -
Look at the bottom of the page. Those photos were all taken from
Nikon's official UK web site.
Bob
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 09:02 PM, Anand DHUPKAR wrote:
Other thing that led me to doubt is the article on
following link which says THERE IS NO D200 YET
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200.htm
Not a particularly reliable source for info, IMHO.
Bob
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 09:22 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
That's just more of Rockwell's blathering. He's merely pointing out
the obvious (no D200 in stores today) and making it seem like a
revelation.
-Adam
I often wonder why anyone reads his blather.
Bob
On 27 Oct 2005 at 6:33, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I can see the difference in my *ist D prints from the FA 35/2 vs. the
DA16-45/4. The latter show excellent resolution in 12 x 18 size, the
former are superb. Wearing my most powerful reading glasses and
examining the prints at a distance that
Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 5:52:27 AM, Bill wrote:
BDC Dave wrote:
Now if he needs 40 fps etc then he needs to upgrade to the Canons
or Nikons. I amd very satisfied with my istD as a steath camera.
People run when they see the 70-200VR with 1.7b tele.
BDC I just got my 300mm f4
Bob Shell wrote:
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Ivu
Thanks Bill, best laugh of the day.
There's more.
On 10/27/05, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all who have commented so far. I took some of your advice and
made this conversion of the Drummer shot:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/drummer2.html
Bit of a crop, converted to black white. What do you think?
Original:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you not alerted eBay to the fact that you indicate that the manuals
available for down-load at your web site aren't allowed to be sold on? You do
say that don't you?
I do occasionally, but it's a bit like trying to eradicate cockroaches
by stepping on
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Herb Chong
the assumption among many professional photographers is that you have the
skill or you wouldn't be there.
That is not a safe assumption for them to make.
That's an understatement.
I've run into a lot of pro photographers who are only
Hi Cory,
While we're still on the power supply
matter can you tell me which is positive
(+) on the AC mains adapter plug? The
outside or the pin. I'm making up a lead
with spades on one end and a concentric
plug on the other to use a 6V 8AH lead
acid gel accumulator when the camera is
on
It's too bad they deleted this guy. Noctilux issues:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006NNe
Worth another chuckle.
On 10/27/05, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/05, William Robb,
On 27 Oct 2005 at 8:08, Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you not alerted eBay to the fact that you indicate that the manuals
available for down-load at your web site aren't allowed to be sold on? You do
say that don't you?
I do occasionally, but it's a bit
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Oct 2005 at 18:32, DagT wrote:
Den 26. okt. 2005 kl. 15.38 skrev Sylwester Pietrzyk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 26.10.05 15:34:
Some Nikonians are already complaining about the small finder
And they haven't seen that in reality yet ;-)
Hi Herb,
How do you like the Sigma 400/5.6 Apo? I
have one (EX) and I like it a lot. But
haven't put it on the *ist D yet.
Don W
Herb Chong wrote:
i like the LowePro Rover series. an Orion AW would also work.
Herb...
- Original Message - From: Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Glen
So, I still don't know the true voltage and current specs for the hotshoe,
but at least I know it works with my old higher-voltage Sunpak flash. I'm
both surprised and delighted.
The entire flash voltage issue is an invented one.
Possibly
On 27 Oct 2005 at 15:02, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Cory,
While we're still on the power supply
matter can you tell me which is positive
(+) on the AC mains adapter plug? The
outside or the pin. I'm making up a lead
with spades on one end and a concentric
plug on the other to use a 6V
On 27 Oct 2005 at 8:16, Mark Roberts wrote:
From what I head from my sensor guys at Kodak in August, it's CCD
production that's holding up the camera. Early 2006 was suggested for
when Kodak would be turning them out...
I assume we are talking about the sensor slated for use in the D645. So
On 10/27/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's an understatement.
I've run into a lot of pro photographers who are only able to do what they do
because the automation in the camera has enough skill to cover for them.
I suspect that the % of truly skilled pro photographers is now
I still don't know about this. In my mind, these lenses have too many custom
parts for them to bother making a single lens. The lens barrels, the
focusing helixes, the diaphragm mechanisms etc have to be different. I can't
see Pentax going to their supplier and ordering one of each to build a
On 10/27/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's too bad they deleted this guy. Noctilux issues:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006NNe
Worth another chuckle.
LOL!
what's this guy on?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Frank said
draw your own conclusions...
-frank
Great, now i have to learn to paint.:-)
Dave
On 10/27/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
They don't need to worry about exposure with color negative film. There's
enough latitude that a three stop miss will still give usable results.
I've saw evidence of that at the photo shop. We used to do a lot of
processing for pros. When they started making the transition to digital
you could
At least it's baseball.
(Unlike Ohio football he double hockey sticks.)
Being a native-born cheesehead from behind the cheddar curtain ...
I became a Cub fan in 1965 when the Braves left Milwaukee for warmer clime.
Far from hanging Wrigley(Yuppie)ville, I'm must a faithful old pup.
But
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I still don't know about this. In my mind, these lenses have too many
custom
parts for them to bother making a single lens. The lens barrels, the
focusing helixes, the diaphragm mechanisms etc have
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I guess my question is how the heck do other manufacturers manage to sell
one
camera that's higher spec'd than a *ist D if that's all anyone actually
needs?
I don't think anyone would argue
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
On 26 Oct 2005 at 22:03, William Robb wrote:
Here we disagree. The istD is hardly a poor offering imaging wise.
Yep I agree it's fine if you only use a slow consumer zoom lens.
It seems to
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
They don't need to worry about exposure with color negative film. There's
enough latitude that a three stop miss will still give usable results.
They are pros. They are supposed to
Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cory,
While we're still on the power supply
matter can you tell me which is positive
(+) on the AC mains adapter plug? The
outside or the pin. I'm making up a lead
with spades on one end and a concentric
plug on the other to use a 6V 8AH lead
acid
On 10/27/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A true Cub fan would never hop on, but some of the younger ones and
some of the Uppies who are Cub fans only because it's trendy will
conveniently convert. When the Cubs made the last round of the
playoffs a few years ago, bars on the south
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how the heck do other manufacturers manage to sell one camera that's
higher spec'd than a *ist D if that's all anyone actually needs?
If members of the public were prevented/prohibited from buying camera
gear higher spec'd than what they need, the major
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:18:11 -0600, William Robb wrote:
That sounds more like a compatability issue. If it was a voltage one,
I suspect the camera would stop working entirely, not just with them
mounted. We had some problems with Minolta Maxxum and third party
flashes years ago. It was badly
Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've saw evidence of that at the photo shop. We used to do a lot of
processing for pros. When they started making the transition to digital
you could see who really had a handle on exposure and who didn't. Not
many did.
They don't need to worry about
They don't need to worry about exposure with color negative film. There's
enough latitude that a three stop miss will still give usable results.
They are pros. They are supposed to be giving better than usable
results.
If you are out by three stops photographing a wedding, you are
On 10/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh my GOD! NOT KEN ROCKWELL, AIEEEeee.
ARRGHH
-FRANK
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 27 Oct 2005 at 6:25, William Robb wrote:
It seems to be pretty good with some of the stratospherically priced glass
that
I use as well. Maybe you need a better tripod.
I don't disagree, I'm just incensed at being told contusions that I need no
higher spec's in a camera and being
On 27 Oct 2005 at 8:54, Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how the heck do other manufacturers manage to sell one camera that's
higher spec'd than a *ist D if that's all anyone actually needs?
If members of the public were prevented/prohibited from buying camera
On Thursday, October 27, 2005, at 07:50 AM, keith_w wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
If members of the public were prevented/prohibited from buying camera
gear higher spec'd than what they need, the major camera manufacturers
would be out of business in a week.
Isn't that a fun thing to think about.
Joe Photographer: Hi, can I take a look at that 80-320 zoom?
Clerk: Let me
Hi Don,
On the *istDS, the camera itself is labeled as to what polarity the power
connector has. The center pin is clearly marked as being positive. The
voltage of 6.5 Vdc is also clearly marked on the camera. (Only the amperage
specification is missing from the camera body.)
Please, let
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Clerk: Out of 36 shots, 10 were out of focus, 15 were blurry, you accidently
took three pictures of the floor, you had tilted horizons in two others and
the other six were mediocre compositions.
geez, that's a pretty good roll by
Bob Shell wrote:
On Thursday, October 27, 2005, at 07:50 AM, keith_w wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, at 06:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/10/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Seriously funny, though I doubt serious
At 08:19 AM 10/27/2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Glen
So, I still don't know the true voltage and current specs for the
hotshoe,
but at least I know it works with my old higher-voltage Sunpak flash. I'm
both surprised and delighted.
The entire
I like it. I was on a switchback similar to this in YoHo national
park last year. Couldn't figure out a way to take a picture of it
that would do justice. I'd say you did.
Good job.
dk
On 10/26/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this
On 25 Oct 2005 at 21:55, Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily, I know there are at least two levels of password protection
and various level of encryption in my package. There is a User password which
allows the document to be opened and a Master
Yes, it's a great feeling. And thanks for the book tip. I haven't read a great
baseball book since Boys of Summer. It's about time I did.
Paul
On 10/27/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A true Cub fan would never hop on, but some of the younger ones and
some of the Uppies who are
Wow. Great job Rod.
I picked up on the comment about autostitch by Fred back in the
spring, and tried it in the summer. I was quite happy with the
results (with the stitch, the source image had it's problems). Ive
recommended it to a few people who were looking for something, but it
seems that
Hi,
I got an old nice Pentax MV. Everything seems to work fine, but I
noticed, that by User Manual longest shutter speed should be 1 second.
My camera gives me also much longer exposures. I tried it at late
evening with lens stopped down to f22, exposure was about 8 seconds and
everything
... to be an email subject! :)
CRB
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a great feeling. And thanks for the book tip. I haven't read a
great baseball book since Boys of Summer. It's about time I did.
Paul
http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/sportandleisure/0,6121,1125459,00.html
-frank
--
On 27 Oct 2005 at 9:56, Dave Kennedy wrote:
Wow. Great job Rod.
Thanks Dave.
I picked up on the comment about autostitch by Fred back in the
spring, and tried it in the summer. I was quite happy with the
results (with the stitch, the source image had it's problems). Ive
recommended it to
On 10/26/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. It was humor.
you left out the u...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Margus,
I'm going to pass along a thought, although I don't own an MV and know
absolutely nothing about them.
The 1 sec. min. shutter speed may only apply to a manual setting.(?)
The meter may, however, be able to set an exposure of up to 30 secs.(?)
I'll be checking to see if you find the answer.
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3831059size=lg
i dunno about this one, so be brutal as you please g
Brutal: I like it Great
Margus Männik wrote:
I got an old nice Pentax MV. Everything seems to work fine, but I
noticed, that by User Manual longest shutter speed should be 1 second.
My camera gives me also much longer exposures. I tried it at late
evening with lens stopped down to f22, exposure was about 8 seconds
On 10/27/05, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got an old nice Pentax MV. Everything seems to work fine, but I
noticed, that by User Manual longest shutter speed should be 1 second.
My camera gives me also much longer exposures. I tried it at late
evening with lens stopped down to
Well, you should be proud. You've been a loyal and vocal Cub's fan, so it was
quite natural that a good south sider like me would address you directly. It's
all in good fun of course. Even those of us who live and die for a sports team
realize in the end that it's all just a game. But a high
Excellent pic. And you can tell that drivers have some fun on that bend.
John
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:31:08 +0100, Dave Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I like it. I was on a switchback similar to this in YoHo national
park last year. Couldn't figure out a way to take a picture of it
the 200 will be short for many kinds of wildlife photography.
I always carry a 200mm a 300mm. The 300mm gets used a lot more than the
200mm (maybe 9 times out of 10 I choose the 300 over the 200).
The 300 f4.5 is the FA the 200 is the f4.0 macro A.
Kenneth Waller
(does outdoor photos
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic, there was a big meeting of the Party brass with journalists
coming to it, including few foreign. And in walked a cameraman with
a Steadycam and began shooting (for those
P.J.
No comment on #1
Red Mill - if it were mine I'd crop from the top down a little to eliminate
the sky in the center top.
Autcolors - the bit of railing along the bottom and the OOF branches on the
RH side are detractions to an otherwise well done image.
My $.02 US worth.
Kenneth
On 10/27/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Classic.
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
is excellent, and
At 10:54 AM 10/27/2005, Cotty wrote:
Actually I'm surprised nobody has ever actually assassinated a political
figure using a video camera as the weapon. Hollowed out, it could provide
plenty of cavity space for high explosives or projectile weaponry. Access
is excellent, and they even stand the
Woah
The perspective distortion is what makes the picture for me. Well,
that and the Teriaultian grain. :-)
-Mat
On 10/26/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
On 10/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got out to take a few photos today and decided to do some seasonal
stuff. The first is a Theaualtian exercise, (so I don't want to hear
any complaints about focus or camera movement, other complaints sure,
I'll just ignore them if I feel
It looks like the limiter here is the monopod. I use a Tamarac 757,
(probably no longer available as a 757) with the exception of that 400, it
looks like I'm carrying more than you. The 757 has leather patches you could
strap the monopod to.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
There seems to be an ongoing defense of Pentax in regards to them being a
smaller firm, not being able to get the sensors, etc. Well when comparing
camera brands, models available, and deciding on purchases, isn't this a
relevant factor?
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
