From a new collection that is well on the way ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/32a.htm
Comments, critique, and the tooting of a horn always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
you need to get a lot closer, Godfrey. Capa would have.
:o)
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 24 July 2007 07:09
To: DUG; PDML List; PAW; SeePhoto Talk
Subject: PESO 2007 - 32a - GDG
From a new
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anybody else here has had a similar injury I'd be interested to
learn how much movement you managed to recover, and in what period of
time. When I broke the wrist the surgeon told me not to expect to
recover full movement, and suggested I might not be able
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When the going gets tough, the big spend money.
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/07/23 Mon PM 04:51:39 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Flooding in England
2007/7/23, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just spent a week under canvas in mid-Wales. Great fun. Only thing
is, I can't work out
there's an awful lot of spare water lying around. I'm quite envious of
Cotty for getting a helicopter ride over it all. I've been watching
the aerial shots on the news and they're fascinating.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
2007/7/24, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can't imagine how hungry being constantly damp makes you..
I can, believe me!
:-(
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/07/23 Mon PM 08:41:14 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Viewfinder readouts
Well, I went to the eye-sight check, because I had serious difficulty
reading green led indicators in my Pentax camera. It appeared my eyes
are more sensitive to the red
On 23/7/07, John Graves, discombobulated, unleashed:
Do you like your hats rare or medium rare. I guess that would be a
measure of how much of a hothead you are?
Actually raw. But I'm being hypothetical as I've never eaten a hat...and
the odds are that I never will ;-)
PS, Liked your
On 24/7/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
there's an awful lot of spare water lying around. I'm quite envious of
Cotty for getting a helicopter ride over it all. I've been watching
the aerial shots on the news and they're fascinating.
I just spoke to my old neighbour where we used to live
Bill Sawyer wrote:
A well deserved congratulations, Mark. Let us know when we can get our copy,
and the best way to get the author to sign it!
Hey Bill -
I ordered a few copies to sell at art fairs, so once they arrive I can
handle signed copies.
My work hours are being cut back to just 1
Or: The Shopgirl
I haven't settled on a title yet...
http://bp1.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RqXsJrMItTI/AcY/EySEY9vVjbo/s1600-h/july_24+001.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/38vj7m
This is the full-frame version. I'm still working on a cropped
version that I may like even more, but I've got some
I like it. The girl reading is in between the mannequins making a nice
triangle, and the colours are vivid.
Dave
On 7/24/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or: The Shopgirl
I haven't settled on a title yet...
I just realized that in my previous PESO post I referred myself as
being at the office. That's because right now, I'm in the office.
Last week I was a courier, this week, I'm back in the office.
If you care for any details, here's my Blog entry from yesterday (but
be warned: I do swear a bit,
Frank I can feel your anquish. I went through the same BS with MMM for
34 years. No respect, no advanced notices about going out of town for
months at atime,among other things.
Things have a way of working out. It has for me for 55 years, and i'm
sure they will for you.
I mean if the big fella
I can't seem to fiqure out the math on this and don't want to quess,
but can anyone tell me what size i need to uprez a 2000 x 1300 file to
print 16x20.
If a 2.74 D1H file can be resized that big.
A client wants this size for her company wall.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
Checking e-mails? Playing games? Watching a video?
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RqX017MItUI/Acg/RCi2_HaXbow/s1600-h/july_24+002.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/2da8eb
Comments always welcome, and thanks in advance.
cheers,
A 16 x 20 at 240dpi would have to be 3840x 4800. That's increasing the
dimensions by almost 3x - don't know how well PhotoShop would do that.
FotoFusion does a great job up-rezzing. Depending on which version you
have there may be size limitations though. The mid-priced ($100)
version
I sure I'm going to be proved wrong by a printer-savy, but almost for
the academic exercise here's my logic:
If the recommended for 8x10 is 5mpixels or 2000x2500, for an image
double size if would be 4000x5000 or almost 4 times the size of your
image.
But the advice I always read is that the
He sure is multitasking: drinking, playing games and breathing...
I like it, I think it would be great as part of a series of people in
bars, alone and wireless connected
Cheers
On 7/24/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
$690 might be more than what you want to spend, but adorama is selling
the Samsung version of the K10D for that:
http://www.adorama.com/ISGDGX10B.html
(Samsung Digimax GX-10) still almost double than the K100D ($374.95)
but I couldn't go back to 1 wheel...
On 7/23/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL
4800 x 6000 will give you 16 x 20 at 300 dpi. But you'll have to go larger and
crop to end up with the proportion of a 16 x 20 as your file is more
rectangular. If you're doing it in photoshop, just go to image size, select
bicubic smoother and set the short end to 16 inches and the pixels per
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:10 AM
Subject: Print sizing question
I can't seem to fiqure out the math on this and don't want to quess,
but can anyone tell me what size i need to uprez a 2000 x 1300 file to
print 16x20.
If a 2.74 D1H file
That blows Frank, sorry to hear about it. On a positive note, I loved
the picture of Charlie, nice shot.
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
I just realized that in my previous PESO post I referred myself as
being at the office. That's because right now, I'm in the office.
Last week I was a
From:
mike wilson
You can't imagine how hungry being constantly damp makes you..
BTDT GTTS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
4800 x 6000 will give you 16 x 20 at 300 dpi. But you'll have to go larger
and crop to end up with the proportion of a 16 x 20 as your file is more
rectangular. If you're doing it in photoshop, just
The BBC will shortly unveil a way of viewing recent programmes through
it's web site. Sadly, only available to users of Windows XP via iPlayer.
Other methods for other platforms will be available over time, though
not specified.
Don't want to start a debate, but if you're a
I see that both BH and Adorama are selling the K10D body for a net
$730 after rebate. I can handle that fine and probably will.
Jack
--- Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$690 might be more than what you want to spend, but adorama is
selling
the Samsung version of the K10D for that:
On 7/22/07, Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been quite awhile since I've posted (or shot much), but like it
or not, I seem to be back.
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo07/peso1.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
The DOF makes for a real 3D effect!
Really interesting pose:
I think it would depend on three things. 1.) Subject matter, a very
detailed photo will loose a lot upresed that much, while a less detailed
shot might be fine. 2,) Viewing distance. If viewed from a reasonable
distance it will look fine. Close up flaws will be very apparent. 3.)
The
On 7/24/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a new collection that is well on the way ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/32a.htm
Comments, critique, and the tooting of a horn always appreciated.
A photo that I'd be proud to have taken. Take that as a
Bwahahahahah!!!
g
Dave
On 7/24/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BBC will shortly unveil a way of viewing recent programmes through
it's web site. Sadly, only available to users of Windows XP via iPlayer.
Other methods for other platforms will be available over time, though
not
On 7/23/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to be in the Village of Stony Creek this morning and took this.
Not much recorded that wouldn't have been in view in 1900.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20oldstonycreek.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax
The point everyone seems to be missing is that this is only a 2x upsize at the
most. No need for a lot of exotic stuff. And I have not noticed that GF or
Stepping does all that much better than Bicubic Smoother. Converting from RAW
is a bit better, but not miraculously so. While I do not print
You do not have to do any math. Just set the short side and rez to what you
want. Use Bicubic Smoother in Photoshop. Better would be to upsize the image
from the RAW file, of course if you upsize from RAW you get to reedit the
image. You can probably get away with a 19x15 or 19.5x15.5 inch
You spend all that money on pro spec'ed equipment, expecting it to be
tough in the field, and it can't even handle this:
http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/07/23/allo-paris-we-have-a-problem/
Pfft.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It would need some cropping anyway to get rid of a bit of hose i didi
not see in the back ground when i shot the picture.
Its a presentation shot, rider on horse, with cooler and ribbon she won.
Dave
On 7/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4800 x 6000 will give you 16 x 20 at 300
I would have to send it out, mostlikely to Future shop lab.
I don't want to by a whole pack of paper for 1 print.
I did an 11x14 re sized by the 10% method last year, but i cannot find
the file to see what i had for that size, thus the quiry.
Thanks all for the answers so far. I told the
Its the new icoke
Good eye on this one Frank
Dave
On 7/24/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
Checking e-mails? Playing games? Watching a video?
I thought it was best to do it in steps using the 10% up res in PS.
No?
Dave
On 7/24/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
4800 x 6000 will give you 16 x 20 at 300 dpi. But you'll have to go
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
I would have to send it out, mostlikely to Future shop lab.
I know their prints up to 12x18 are photographic, you might want to check
with them and see what they do with bigger prints.
For $14.99, I expect
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
You do not have to do any math. Just set the short side and rez to what
you want. Use Bicubic Smoother in Photoshop. Better would be to upsize the
image from the RAW file, of course if you upsize from RAW you
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
I thought it was best to do it in steps using the 10% up res in PS.
No?
I learned it that way a few years ago when 6.0 was still current. I noticed
with CS that it didn't seem to make much difference, and
Perhaps you should tell that to Fred Miranda, who sells a Photoshop
plugin. to do Stepwise, (or as he puts it stair), interpolation, and
seems to be well respected for his results. He even supplies samples to
compare results between his SI method and Genuine Fractals. I'm not
sure where
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy this lens at a reasonable price. Is it any good ?
SMC PENTAX-FA 1:3.5-4.7 28-80mm
This one: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/short/FA28-80f3.5-4.7.html
I intend using it on the K10D
--
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This is sort of a photo for Frank so maybe he'll feel better about his
current indoor status, (then again it may make him feel worse).
This morning yet again I had to be in Stony Creek, and while there
captured this. I shot around it a bit and ended up liking the first
exposure best...
Maybe I'm a cynic, but considering Reuters recent history with altered
photographs can we be sure it wasn't staged?
David Savage wrote:
You spend all that money on pro spec'ed equipment, expecting it to be
tough in the field, and it can't even handle this:
On 7/24/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is sort of a photo for Frank so maybe he'll feel better about his
current indoor status, (then again it may make him feel worse).
This morning yet again I had to be in Stony Creek, and while there
captured this. I shot around it a bit
Maybe he's just totally mystified by his new iProduct...
Nice capture by the way.
frank theriault wrote:
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
Checking e-mails? Playing games? Watching a video?
It's a power zoom lens so it's a bit heavier than most Pentax lenses of
the same general type. I have no direct experience but it is however
not generally well thought of.
http://stans-photography.info/LongComments.html#28-80%20mm%20f/3.5-4.7%20(p)%20FA
Useful site to visit before asking
Sounds better, last time I checked the Pentax was $130+; now $40 is no
difference and you can share the battery grip if needed
On 7/24/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that both BH and Adorama are selling the K10D body for a net
$730 after rebate. I can handle that fine and
I like it. Nicely composed.
frank theriault wrote:
Or: The Shopgirl
I haven't settled on a title yet...
http://bp1.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RqXsJrMItTI/AcY/EySEY9vVjbo/s1600-h/july_24+001.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/38vj7m
This is the full-frame version. I'm still working on a
That's just fantastic Mark, both the photos of course and the fact you're
publishing them this way.
Tom C.
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: A Snowflake Book (At Last)...
Date: Sat, 21 Jul
Good one. Nicely composed.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is sort of a photo for Frank so maybe he'll feel better about his
current indoor status, (then again it may make him feel worse).
This morning yet again I had to
Patrick Genovese wrote on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:12:50 -0700
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy this lens at a reasonable price. Is
it any good ?
SMC PENTAX-FA 1:3.5-4.7 28-80mm
This one: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/short/
FA28-80f3.5-4.7.html
I intend using it on the K10D
Native resolution would have it print at about 80 ppi, which is a bit
too low. I'd uprez it to about 2.7x that resolution, making a
4160x5200 pixel file, and then do some careful resharpening for the
16x20 inch print @ 260 ppi. It will not be great for ultimate
resolution, but if the
On Jul 24, 2007, at 5:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
Checking e-mails? Playing games? Watching a video?
http://tinyurl.com/2da8eb
Could be doing all four, and more, including reading text messages,
checking stock market
On Jul 24, 2007, at 5:16 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/38vj7m
This is the full-frame version. I'm still working on a cropped
version that I may like even more, but I've got some more to do on it
tonight (can't do it from the office right now) when I get home. I'll
likely
I've seen Fred's plug-in plug. I think he's one of only a few who still
consider stepping to be a good method. For normal upsizing a straight Bicubic
Smoother interpolation compares very favorably to a fractals job as well.
Fractals is at its best when you have to go extremely large. The art
I agree on both counts.
G
On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Norm Baugher wrote:
That blows Frank, sorry to hear about it. On a positive note, I loved
the picture of Charlie, nice shot.
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
I just realized that in my previous PESO post I referred myself as
being at the
On Jul 24, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Cotty wrote:
The BBC will shortly unveil a way of viewing recent programmes through
it's web site. Sadly, only available to users of Windows XP via
iPlayer.
Other methods for other platforms will be available over time, though
not specified.
Don't want to
Pretty girl, pretty pic. I like the framing as presented. A slightly tighter
crop might be a wee bit better, but not necessarilly. The steps help establish
place and of course the background figures are important and don't look like
they'd be happy being squeezed.:-).
Paul
--
Good one. Interesting moment well captured.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 24, 2007, at 5:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
It looks like a cell phone. Is he checking his address book?
Checking e-mails? Playing
As a PS to my earlier message, I would probably clone out the orange chair if I
didn't crop. But I know you would not :-)).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it. Nicely composed.
frank theriault wrote:
Or: The Shopgirl
Adam Maas schreef:
Rodinal: If it' liquid, it's good. Has shelf life measurable in decades.
Probably true, but I just noticed that when switching from a bottle that
was openend about a year ago (and quite brown and some residu) to a
fresh bottle requires, you may have to adapt development time
The exotics may work better when you are trying for a 10x upsize, but Dave is
only talking about 2x. And Steady was normally upsizing his images to 50mb
files for his agency last I knew, but but don't listen to him. Instead listen
to someone who read something, or is selling something, or is
Is this better?
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154/display/9678878
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: peso: sami on
A simple web search shows that many photographers have found that
stepwise or stair interpolation is superior to Photoshops single step
bicubic interpolation, and many are still using the technique. Some
even offer free tools to work with 16 bit images. In fact I haven't
seen a site that
Set image interpolation to bicubic smoother in preferences/general.
Set the crop tool to the aspect ratio and resolution you want, and do it
in
one step.
I'd try 240 pixels per inch. I can generally get away with that on my
printer.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From:
Godfrey, I'm unfamiliar with the term low frequency as it relates to this
discussion.
Please elaborate.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
Native resolution would have it print at about 80 ppi, which is a
It's 4x I believe, not 2x. At least 4 times the area
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:31 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Print sizing question
The exotics may work better when you
On 7/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just waiting for him. Don't mind me.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/31c.htm
Comments, critique, maybe a treat, always appreciated.
I can almost ~feel~ his nervous energy!
Terrific feel - wonderful shot.
cheers,
frank
On 24/7/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I were a UK citizen, I'd be happy to. I hate seeing government
subsidized monopolies, in any venue.
D'oh!! Apologies - I forgot it's UK only. Please disregard this thread
unless you're a Brit :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Yes, it is! The pole partially blocking her face can be forgiven. The
lighting, however, is another matter. Can't be done now obviously, but
had flash been used at this angle, a vertical hold with flash to the
right might have covered enough of that sweet face to save the image.
Actually, an off
That's the file size, Bill. The ppi is only 2x. Advertisers use file size
because it is the square of the magnification and thus sounds more impressive.
Ad speak has noting to do with reality.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Last weekend I took the kids into Brighton to see the area I grew up,
most of it still still looks just the same... I was interested to see
the ancient Church of St Peters in Preston village was open to the
public. I personally don't have religion, but I am constantly amazed
what our ancestors
Few more shots from today...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sorry, I dropped into jargon ... ;-)
Generally, highly detailed scenes with lots of interacting edges are
considered high frequency. Scenes with few hard edges and crossing
interactions are considered low frequency. Digital sharpening
techniques use to enhance the perception of sharpness
A 16x20 is a linear 2x magnification of an 8x10 and has 4x the area.
G
On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
It's 4x I believe, not 2x. At least 4 times the area
The exotics may work better when you are trying for a 10x upsize,
but Dave
is only talking about 2x. ...
--
PDML
Cotty wrote:
Few more shots from today...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
If ever there was a good advert for Landy Tanks, this is it I feel a
bit bad really, while the rest of the country were bailing out their
homes, right down on the Sussex coast we were enjoying the
Fascinating. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last weekend I took the kids into Brighton to see the area I grew up,
most of it still still looks just the same... I was interested to see
the ancient Church of St
I suggest you take up with a sadist.
that would be nice, although I'm making it fairly painful for myself
at times. I'm determined to regain as much movement as possible.
I must say, I don't remember noticing any difficult with you walking.
Smashing a knee-cap must be a candidate for one of
Does that video cam float?
Norm
Cotty wrote:
Few more shots from today...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Amazing old church. Nice shots too...
Norm
drew wrote:
Last weekend I took the kids into Brighton to see the area I grew up,
most of it still still looks just the same... I was interested to see
the ancient Church of St Peters in Preston village was open to the
public. I personally don't
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
mike wilson
You can't imagine how hungry being constantly damp makes you..
BTDT GTTS
YFB
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
David Savage wrote:
You spend all that money on pro spec'ed equipment, expecting it to be
tough in the field, and it can't even handle this:
http://blogs.reuters.com/2007/07/23/allo-paris-we-have-a-problem/
For the price of it, I would expect at least fire _resistance_.
--
PDML
Bob W wrote:
I suggest you take up with a sadist.
that would be nice, although I'm making it fairly painful for myself
at times. I'm determined to regain as much movement as possible.
I must say, I don't remember noticing any difficult with you walking.
Smashing a knee-cap must be a
On 24/7/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does that video cam float?
it does if the price is right :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Maybe??
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe I'm a cynic, but considering Reuters recent
On 24/7/07, drew, discombobulated, unleashed:
If ever there was a good advert for Landy Tanks, this is it I feel a
bit bad really, while the rest of the country were bailing out their
homes, right down on the Sussex coast we were enjoying the sunshine.
Previous to these shots i was
On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Cotty wrote:
Few more shots from today...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
Fer hell damp I call it. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi,
I do own one and unfortunately it's nothing special. Similar 28-105mm
PowerZoom lens is much better.
BR, Margus
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Hi
I have the opportunity to buy this lens at a reasonable price. Is it any good
?
SMC PENTAX-FA 1:3.5-4.7 28-80mm
This one:
I told my ex wife I needed a backup body...
Regards,
Bob...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Back Up Body
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks, Paul. I'm going to wait until I can get a defaced version, so
that I'll have proof that I once knew a famous person
I hope Grace enjoyed the Zoo, especially the foal zebra, whose name, I
believe, is Phoebe. When active, they're great to watch. By the way, the Zoo
is open on Wednesday
Mark,
The cut-back hours thing sounds like a mixed blessing, I hope it works out
OK. I'm serious about a signed copy, so please let me know when I can get
my copy - Noted Michigan Artist, etc.
By the way, I've been planning a trip to the Allegan State Game Area this
summer, to see if I can get
- Original Message -
From: drew
Subject: GESO: Trip to Brighton
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/72157600985249378/
Appreciate any thoughts...
Sucky presentation. I was gone before the first picture came up.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
And she went shopping for one?
;-)
Cheers,
Dave
At 08:11 AM 25/07/2007, Bob Blakely wrote:
I told my ex wife I needed a backup body...
Regards,
Bob...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Back Up Body
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
They seemed to come up quick enough for me to view.
Nice pictures.. but I was hoping to see a bit more of the church and
area. I've not been to Brighton but I spent some time wandering in
Northleech and its church: there are a lot of photo opportunities in
these old churches regardless of
On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/7/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does that video cam float?
it does if the price is right :-)
Does PortaBrace sell water wings?
Cheers
Beaker
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey Bill -
The cut-back hours thing sounds like a mixed blessing, I hope it works out
OK. I'm serious about a signed copy, so please let me know when I can get
my copy - Noted Michigan Artist, etc.
No problem on the signed copy - I'm getting a batch of 20 books in next
week, and can get
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
