In engineering parlance you ...pulled it out of your a**...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Juan Buhler
Subject: Re: AW: Manual Focus Pentax Glass on istD
I don't have an LX, but love the viewfinder in my MXs.
I wonder how much would a DSLR with a viewfinder that is as
Shouldn't that be handbag holder...
Tanya and her handbag wrote:
hehe, is this better Frank? lol...
tan. :)
Tanya Mayer Photography
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 3315 4549
Mobile +61 0437831247
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because they mellow with age...
Actually there's a short explanation here.
http://www.aohc.it/info08e.htm
The cure seems to be to expose the lens to UV light. Leaving in in
direct sunlight with the caps off so that the light streams through the
elements for a time seems to be enough.
Nicola
I think these come with separate rear filters.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Frank.
Something wrong with your LX its producing bent lines.vbbg
Love this one.The family in the centre and the background curves all work fine
together.
This one actually started me thinking(oh oh)A lense like
Now that really is silly looking.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Mann Subject: Re: More Damn
Flower Pictures (MDFP?)
I was expecting to see the *istD attached to your 6x7 bellows.
Dave, since you asked...
It was only scorched, which is why it's painted White today, otherwise
it might be known as the Stone House...
(or variations there of...).
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: For Francis
It's nice *we* can finally blame *you guys* for
mike wilson wrote:
snip
I thought the Kazimierz, Krakow subtitle to the picture was quite
enough clue 8-)
Anyway, I see nothing wrong with naming a child with an unusual name.
They only have to endure vicious spitefulness through infant and
primary school. After that, it's plain sailing.
And
I'm sure you've heard this a lot by now but... Link?
John Francis wrote:
I know - it's a cat picture.
He might be fluffy, but I wouldn't describe him as 'cute'.
Technical details:
*ist-D @ ISO 200, FA 28-105/f4-f5.6 @ 65mm, 1/250 @ f8
Shot in RAW, imported to Adobe Elements 3.0 using ACR,
and
Innocent! That thing looks like a battering ram. Military equipment
with protruding ordinance looks more innocent.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You think Guzzis are ugly?
Not me, not any of them ... well, except for one or two.
My MZs can knock them into a cocked hat...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/istD_6x7bellows.jpg
Damn! What are you, the Howard Hughes of cameras???
From the looks of that he's the Mikhail Kalashnikov of
If they were that efficient we'd all be in jail by now.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bob W
Subject: Re: PESO: For Francis
If you decide to do it again within the next 4 years, please let me
know.
I'll stand shoulder-to-shoulder with you.
Watch it Bob, the department of
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_cyowtfs.html
Technical Data
Pentax *ist-D ISO 200 @ 1/50sec
smc Pentax-FA 20-35mm f4.0 @ f16.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that
Creative Accounting.
Derby Chang wrote:
Joseph wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2005/20050210.pdf
That's really interesting. The company certainly has turned around in
the last three years (9 billion yen loss in 2002 to 2 billion yen
profit last year).
So why can't I buy the
The 600mm Solid Cat was manufactured by Perkin Elmer.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah the Leica R 600mm mirror lens in a Minolta one indeed...
Hmm. I was always under the impressiong that that particular
lens was made by Vivitar ... Vivitar made an
Gee, it would be nice to have a link, since if there was an original it
didn't get to my mailbox.
Jim Hemenway wrote:
Ah! So that's what Godfrey looks like... 6th row, last column.
:-)
Jim
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the
He could try to arrest all of the scofflaws, but he'd soon run out of
handcuffs.
Jim Hemenway wrote:
I like this bunch of photos... well done along with an interesting story.
I'm unclear on the concept though. If using more than two dogs is now
illegal, why are there so many. And, why isn't the
Large buffer for fast shooting, 8mp to make somewhat larger prints,
(also allows for more cropping). Small size with a good grip, oh wait
the *ist-Ds already has that. The first two items. On the other hand
it's not enough better than the *ist-D or Ds to make it worth the hassle
of changing
Or just stubborn about it.
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:16:37 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: PESO: Roasting Marshmallows, Canadian Style
Nice, Frank.
Here we think of roasting marshmallows as a
I like it, I'm not even sure why.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maiden Hair grass is an interesting plant in that it looks better dead than
alive. After a few months of frigid temperratures, it's flowers puff up and
becomne quite pretty. I used it to test the Sigma EF-500 DG Super flash. This
is
You're right, this is just way too much information, (damn more nightmares).
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:59:27 -0700, Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and nibble at screaming children
Who wouldn't?
Joe
I've gotten in trouble whenever I've tried to do that.
Be honest Frank, of course you would, any time you have a chance.
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:04:13 +, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand corrected. Slip of the finger, as I _do_ know how to spell it.
She is Polish.
m
Well, you should have told us from the
Interesting. I like it. (You don't need me to tell you the exposure
and scanning are dead on).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/obey.html
Junk? Profound? Intriguing? Bland? LOL
I don't know just a quick little snap of a scene that caught my
attention.
Jostein, we care, we care...
Jostein wrote:
Dunno if anyone cares,but...:-)
Will be back in 10 days' time.
See you guys.
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
I can understand why
If they are like most other companies they probably hired a fulfillment
house to handle it for them. These places are usually run on a very
tight budget and the only way for them to make a profit is to run as
lean as possible. This can lead to very spotty operations.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/18 Fri AM 02:21:07 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Big Dress Day
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:39:02 +, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bwahahahahahah..
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You're all evil. I was up there on an errand again this morning
and stopped back into the store. They threw in a used Nikon HN-1
metal lens hood and several used Pentax back caps as extras,
dropped the price $50. I took it.
Sheesh, I own too many
There's a rational for keeping the 1.7. The instructions that come with
the Autobellows M states that
the M 1.7 50mm has a flatter plane of focus than the 50 f1.4. Since all
the 1.7's have the same basic
optical formula as all of the 1.4's as well. You could assume that the
1.7 would give
I think you're reading more into this than there is.
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
I divert all my junk mail into a separate folder, and periodically
check to make sure there isn't any real mail in there, before I flush
it away. I have noticed for a long time that the spam subjects often
contain the number
A major manufacturer with an existing relationship will have
pre-production copies and specifications
for design and testing. If Sony is going to have the chip in quantity
soon then their major customers already
have something to work with.
John Francis wrote:
Mark Roberts mused:
Alin
After the recovery post how could we ever forget...
Steve and Tanya wrote:
hey Paul! yep, i's alive
hehe, glad that you all seem to remember me!
tan. :)
Tanya Mayer Photography
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 3315 4549
Mobile +61 0437831247
-Original Message-
Since I like my camera bodies to have identical controls I'd veto the
*ist-Ds as it seems to have significant handling differences if you use
it in anything other than in green program mode. In addition it uses
CF cards as opposed to SD cards, which will complicate your life with
another
Lots of context.
frank theriault wrote:
I had this printed up for today, because I thought the PUG theme for
March was BW (as mentioned in another thread). I've now decided
that, while it's an okay shot, I'll wait until closer to March 20 to
decide what I'm going to submit. Since it's hanging
Just what we need, second rate numerology to find the answer to life,
now if only we knew the question...
Mishka wrote:
nah, much simpler, really:
1443 = 1442+1 - , moving 1 to the first position, 11442 - 2442
which is 42 reversed and 42.
42!
42!!
42!!!
i bet, those are coded emails sent by
Canon also put the mode control dial where the shutter speed dial used
to go to give it a more analog appearance, removed
the information LCD, since who needs information if the camera is going
to think for you after all. (The best of all possible worlds).
Still the 8mp is a slight improvement,
DPReview quotes $899.00. Still doesn't excite me I'd have to use Canon
glass, which is expensive if it's good.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I just read the article, and while some of the technical stuff eludes me as
to its value or just what it all means, the camera sure looks tempting.
Interesting
Ooooh, they must be serious it's black.
Cotty wrote:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't
- From: Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: M42 adaptor
Aside from the obvious superiority of the coatings on the SMC
Takumars, not all M42 lenses have an auto manual
switch, which will be necessary if you want to use
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and make room before they have
to sell them for
So you're voting for number 2. It's more hopeful than 1.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone
Powell Hargrave wrote:
At 09:11 PM 16/02/2005 , you wrote:
Aside from the obvious superiority of the coatings on the SMC Takumars,
not all M42 lenses have an auto manual
switch, which will be necessary if you want to use the lenses at any
aperture other than their maximum.
One way around
I've been looking for a way to order this, I too prefer a grid screen
and this looks like it's the closest we may get.
Unfortunately Pentax USA doesn't seem to be importing them.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Simon King
Subject: RE: LL-60 Screen for istD
Hi William,
/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: M42 adaptor
When's the last time you used an M42 lens? I don't think so.
Raimo K wrote:
Auto/manual switch is not needed
A bit more clever than the usual...
John wrote:
going back to slep..
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
Vivitar 2000 flash units have them, nothing special, just a medium power
flash, that tilts, for under $14.00. I've bought two and I wasn't even
upset when one of them bit the dust, literally...
Butch Black wrote:
Hi Rodney.
Any flash with a sync cord will work. The trick is finding a flash
You're a cruel man Robb...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Mark Roberts Subject: Re: More
Damn Flower Pictures (MDFP?)
What are you using for a macro rig?
ist-D and SMC-F 100/2.8 Macro
Check this:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/istD_bellows.html
William Robb
--
There should be but I wasn't very successful. I'm still working on it.
I was exposing for his face which was illuminated primarily by room
light. I'm finding that even RAW is a lot like shooting slides.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Peter,
Nice capture, although there sure are a lot of fried
Cheap 'n nasty, but in a good way...
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: New From Pentax...
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:00:26 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make
Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 2/16/2005 7:59:34 AM
Subject: Re: PESO -- Beanery Baby Revisited
There should be but I wasn't very successful. I'm still working on it.
I was exposing for his face which was illuminated primarily by room
light. I'm
John you're right and you're wrong. If the lens tells the body the
focus distance, that would be usefully for
helping calculate the flash duration, disabling TTL flash with lenses
that don't support sending distance
information to the body has two purposes, and one is the sale of new
lenses,
Yes, any k mount rear lens cap will fit on any k mount lens.however
there are two basic types of rear lens mount one with a flange which
covers the A contact the other without. It's would be better to use the
version with the flange on A contact lenses.
Isaac wrote:
Hello, I was wondering if
They sound ugly and painful...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah - maybe I'll sign up for accordion lesions...
You can get a doctor to remove those, you know...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
, that simply isn't the case.
As I said, people are far too fast to accuse Pentax of deliberately
disabling bodies for the sole purpose of selling new lenses.
Peter J. Alling mused:
John you're right and you're wrong. If the lens tells the body the
focus distance, that would be usefully for
helping
He can get a 12mm for the LX as well...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Well, there's a 12mm for the Leica LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
It's an addiction, really. When I got my 24-48mm zoom, I thought,
man, who needs anything wider than this? Then I bought Chang-Sang's
Vivitar
It got to my mailbox.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Not sure if this shows up on the list or not. If you are able to read
it, please respond to my email address rather than the list, as I have
not seen any list traffic since this morning.
Thanks,
Bruce
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up
Now that brings to mind a whole bunch of images I didn't need just
before bed...
Brian Walters wrote:
Frank
Nicely done - who needs a waist level finder?
What happened after the shutter went off? Did you have an unpleasant
encounter with the broom handle???
Cheers
Brian
M42 lenses work perfectly with an adapter.
Isaac wrote:
I saw the reply to my question about the use of Leica lenses. Do you have
the same problem with the M42 lenses as well? I notice they are quite
inexpensive these days and wouldn't mind adding a few if they would work
correctly.
--
I can
Actually it's image circle is a tad smaller than that required to cover
an APS sized sensor. The Vemer/Spiritone/Sigma
12mm is just about right. (Thought the Peleng is probably a sharper lens).
Tim Sherburne wrote:
You could always try the partial frame 8mm Peleng fisheye. Although it
doesn't
Frank, I'm surprised at you, this is wonderfully focused. It's a great
composition by the way.
frank theriault wrote:
This poor kid could hardly keep his eyes open. vbg
Taken with the LX at waist level (I'm not taking a photo, I'm just
fixing something on the camera, just ignore me, I'm not
I'd like to thank everyone who commented. It looks like one of the main
features of the two images escaped everyone. Here's a hint, they were
taken about 8 months apart.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:02:03 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone who
Aside from the obvious superiority of the coatings on the SMC Takumars,
not all M42 lenses have an auto manual
switch, which will be necessary if you want to use the lenses at any
aperture other than their maximum.
Isaac wrote:
Good to know. Is there any reason to buy the Pentax over one of the
.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.muellerworld.com/peleng/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling
Actually it's image circle is a tad smaller than that required to cover
an APS sized sensor. The Vemer/Spiritone/Sigma
12mm is just about right. (Thought the Peleng is probably a sharper
There's no accounting for e-bay. In fact looking at the lens I'd not be
inclined to bid particularly
high. A sellers description can inspire confidence or not. This did not.
mike.wilson wrote:
Slightly dusty and not the most desirable version but still
Francis wrote:
At 10:21 AM 2/15/2005 -0700, you wrote:
For a short non-technical answer...
I typically let the meter determine exposure unless I'm shooting in
unusual lighting/circumstances where I know better than the meter,
for instance shooting a subject in a snow covered scene or with
Shel,
I would love to have gotten this from you, but any reasonable offer
would have been well beyond my current budget.
--Peter
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Since no one here wanted to pay my asking price, I put the lens on eBay
today with a lower starting bid. Have fun or not ;-))
I think touched would be more like it...
Cotty wrote:
http://memorial.petalert.com.au/memorial.php?uid=95
I'm really choked.
Arf.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why
Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: OT - Cotty is dead. Long live Cotty!
http://memorial.petalert.com.au/memorial.php?uid=95
I'm really choked.
Nasty little Eskimo.
The world is a better place without the little
For anyone who remembers my earlier PAW Beanery Baby
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Beanery_Baby.html
I was in the local coffee shop, (The Beanery, get it), and I caught
this, not quite as
interesting and shot with the *ist-D in color not Tri-X but still
interesting...
Damn, must have erased it. It'll be back soon.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling Subject: PESO --
Beanery Baby Revisited
For anyone who remembers my earlier PAW Beanery Baby
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Beanery_Baby.html
No picture.
William
It's there now.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Damn, must have erased it. It'll be back soon.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling Subject: PESO --
Beanery Baby Revisited
For anyone who remembers my earlier PAW Beanery Baby
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_
This did.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Testing - none of my posts seem to be coming through.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
Oh, well I stand, well actually sit, corrected...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not show tunes, but Gilbert and Sullivan. (Which may be even worse).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
New guy posts to say hello
I should have realized that...
John Forbes wrote:
Gilbert would not have rhymed dance with Penzance!
John
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:18:37 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not show tunes, but Gilbert and Sullivan. (Which may be even worse).
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Now you should know better than that.
Nicola Griffanti wrote:
Test don't reply, thanks
Nicola Griffanti
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during
A bit like athletes foot...
Cotty wrote:
On 14/2/05, Will Dimmit, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually, I was just thinking how nice it was to have stumbled upon to
what seems to be a vibrant, closely knit community - with a sense of
humor to boot. I was (~am) a long time Minolta guy, and
That's good. Better than mine, damn...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Welcoming myself
Wil, I only stopped by for some advice about a motor drive for an MX in
1998. These guys and gals kinda grow on you.
Venereal warts do the same thing, something you
That's a very nice image the back lighting worked wonderfully.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I was trying to decide to post this or not. But all this talk of
macro lenses pushed me over the edge. Taken two days ago as I saw the
sun shining through the daffodils.
Pentax *istD, Tamron SP 90/2.8 Macro AF,
You sure, I've heard that peat bogs stop deterioration of bodies, the
evidence will never go away...
Cotty wrote:
On 14/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wil, I only stopped by for some advice about a motor drive for an
MX in
1998. These guys and gals kinda grow on you.
OK, so where, and how much?
William Robb wrote:
Resend. sorry.
I have just aquired one of the above mentioned screens.
Installation was easy, imaging putting a screen into an LX, only smaller.
Here is a view through the istD viewfinder of the screen.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/ll-60.jpg
I don't know why you have to work on it Frank, you already are very
proficient at taking fuzzy shots...
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:21:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, this sounds like a Toronto/Detroit international PDML outing. We have to work on
I was going to include a possible patriotism warning but didn't think it
necessary.
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:32:37 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I had a very unproductive day. I usually shoot a bunch of useless
photos, if I have nothing better
Yes.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Is it true that later K-1000 cameras were built outside of Japan (China?)
and the later K-1000 bodies use some plastic parts while the earlier ones
were all metal?
Shel
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
I get the message No Such Photograph.
Jens Bladt wrote:
I made two similar shots with these two lenes.
The difference is not all that obvoius.
Considering I paid 300 USD for the Pentax lens and only a fraction of this
for the (MF) Tokina
lens, it's not all that bad, is it?
mike wilson wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Yet you use the metric system, how strange...
mike wilson wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
My God, they're all driving on the wrong side of the road!
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3107166size=lg
We didn't get beaten by Napoleon
But he uses a whip and at least some might enjoy that.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: mike wilson Subject: Re: PESO:
Automaton
We got beaten by De Gaulle 8-(((
I feel your pain. We got beaten by Cretien
William Robb
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
I don't know if this works for me, there's some kind of unnatural
feeling about it, like the grain is wrong.
The composition is alright though.
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/bank.jpg
Taken yesterday while I was out strolling around on my lunch break.
ist-D, FA*80-200/2.8
Sounds like my problem when I tripped over my dog and dropped my LX onto
the road from
a couple of inches after cradling it all the way down. It still hurts
to look at the scrapes. Luckily
everything still works on the camera, except the prism
interchangeability, which was a problem
sometime
You should be very afraid.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: frank theriault Subject: Re: GFM
Photo Weekend.
Billy Boy, I am ~so~ looking forward to meeting you.
That's Dave, you and me - three Canadians. Must be a record, eh?
Thats like a half dozen who have told me
Not exactly what I expected, but it's a good newspaper shot.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
As we seem to have a small theme going of pictures taken on the road,
here's one I made earlier.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/2593239
mike
--
I can understand why mankind
I make no comment...
http://www.pma-show.com/pentax/003_istDS.html
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
Damn, I didn't see this before I posted. Nevermind.
David Nelson wrote:
Well that got your attention didn't it?
It's the *ist DS Silver, identical functionally to the normal black
*ist DS. HAR!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0502/05021306pentax_istdssilver.asp
Will a silver limited lens look good
Nice job getting the ISO 3200 noise out. (You don't want to know what
my e-mail client's spell checker suggests for Dimmit).
Will Dimmit wrote:
Hi. I'm new to the list (48hrs our so now). Just thought I'd
introduce myself and share a music (rock rather than jazz) photo.
This was taken
Ann, it's a nicely executed photo, in spite of the fact that I generally
see Christo's work to be more than a bit silly.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3117510
Comments, as much about the subject as my photo,
welcome :)
Pentax K-X - tri-x - grabbed it.
annsan
Now it really does compete with the Rebel D, (they're both silver)...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: New From Pentax...
I make no comment...
http://www.pma-show.com/pentax/003_istDS.html
That should attract the consumers who want an amateur camera
Well I had a very unproductive day. I usually shoot a bunch of useless
photos, if I have nothing better to do. All I saw that caught my eye
was this.
Taken with the 28-200mm FA which on a film body is just so-so but really
finds it's mark on the *ist D. I bet it would be great on a DS as
Not show tunes, but Gilbert and Sullivan. (Which may be even worse).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Poor Will!
He's going to think he's stumbled into a nut-house (OTOH, maybe he has!
g).
You realize that WAS the idea? Let him have a very clear view
Cotty wrote:
snip
Anyway, off to do some more mono prints. Substandard and proud of it ;-)
I think that this belongs on that memorable quote list.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I
It sounds like there's something defective in your camera. I haven't
seen any behavior like this
when my batteries get low enough my camera just shuts down with a
batteries exhausted message.
Michael Heim wrote:
The stange thing is: the batteries ARE new. I had the smae behaviour
with tho old
Yet you use the metric system, how strange...
mike wilson wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
My God, they're all driving on the wrong side of the road!
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3107166size=lg
We didn't get beaten by Napoleon. 8-)
--
I can understand why mankind
That would depend on what you were trying to accomplish, wouldn't it?
Graywolf wrote:
I always understood that there are Leica users, and Leica
collectors. You do not want to invite both to the same party.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Very nice.
Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3342/display/2582715
The subject is also the mission at Carmel, California. This is a
companion to the one I posted a few days ago.
Comments welcome.
Joe
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war
401 - 500 of 2603 matches
Mail list logo
