No, Scott, thank you for posting this information--I very much
appreciate it. As I have no current plans to digitize, this is
valuable information. My wife and I have been using the Wal-Mart in
Winchester for most of our processing. The pro shops in toward DC
charge about four times as
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Anyway, in the years we have done this, our results with print
processing have been very good. I wish they would offer good BW
print C-41 processing, though. Those two rolls with the purplish
tint disappointed me. Perhaps
of scanning and printing at home.
Glen
On Oct 10, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
At 11:20 AM -0400 10/10/07, Glen Tortorella wrote:
I am considering buying a scanner (and a photo inkjet, too). I do
not like being pigeon-holed to the 8.5x11 size, or having to cut my
prints in order
in
5x7 (Entrada bright is a superb matte art paper).
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I am considering buying a scanner (and a photo inkjet, too). I do
not like being pigeon-holed to the 8.5x11 size, or having to cut my
prints in order to attain different sizes. I mention 8.5x11 because
that
minilabs pass off as matte paper. Matte papers are not really ideal
for colour work unless you want a watercolour look to the print.
You may want to look at Moab?legion's other products as well, I
simply went with the paper I knew.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam
:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam...
Will the Moab 5x7 paper you mention work with the R280? I just want
to make sure of this.
Though, I am somewhat disappointed, as Newegg is now out of stock on
the R280. I would prefer buying it from them. I know the R280 is
probably available
Is it at all difficult to select and print only those negatives that
you find acceptable?
Glen
On Oct 10, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
At 1:10 PM -0400 10/10/07, Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you for the comment...
The Epson 4x6 paper is available only in glossy or semi-gloss
on the righteous and the unrighteous” (Matt. 5:45).
To alienate someone for their beliefs is not a way of making friends.
Tom C.
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film
people like you who know the 'right'.
So much war and persecution can be blamed on this.
Regards, Bob S
On 10/10/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thank you for you comments, Scott. Since you have made note of the
subject, I will explain my position with regard to BH.
I am
discriminate against
another because
of their beliefs. Such nonsense.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thank you for you comments, Scott. Since you have made note of the
subject, I will explain my position with regard to BH.
I
you no doubt support their economy through your
purchases.
Tom C.
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing (Long winded)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:40:48
not write your next emails in Aramaic for us?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Tortorella
Sent: 10 October 2007 22:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing (Long winded)
I do not wish
, at 6:18 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Glen,
Nobody is slandering anybody here or blaspheming. See my post again.
It is a simple comment and a wish for recognition of my rights to hold
a different opinion than yours without holy war.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/10/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED
in this country is supporting a godless
Red China - yet you no doubt support their economy through your
purchases.
Tom C.
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing
on the way to a synagogue?
If there house were on fire, would you warn them?
Tom C.
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing (Long winded)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17
them, they demand 'reason and discernment'! Har!
I wish you a harvest of turds, my bigoted chum!
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Tortorella
Sent: 10 October 2007 23:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Wal
feel
motivated to purchase something from someone who believes and upholds
the teachings of this book?
Read the Talmud.
Glen
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:13 PM, David Savage wrote:
On 10/11/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who contradict and blaspheme Jesus Christ clearly
In my last post, I forgot to add this link:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
This should also help.
Glen
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:13 PM, David Savage wrote:
On 10/11/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who contradict and blaspheme Jesus Christ clearly
This sounds great. The eastern slope of the Sierra is wonderful. I
did some hiking there in 1996 (around Big Pine). Too bad there is no
sign of fall here (northern Virginia). Summer just refuses to die.
It has been in the 90s here. When will the cooler weather finally
arrive?...(I
Good point--I agree.
Glen
On Oct 8, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Link to Gary's Classic Cars doesn't belong there... Regards, Bob S.
On 10/8/07, Ted Beilby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has been many years since I did this type of work. My boss
wanted to have
me do the photos
Nice shots, Ted. I have yet to master interior lighting. I need a
good (bounce capable) flash.
Glen
On Oct 8, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Ted Beilby wrote:
It has been many years since I did this type of work. My boss
wanted to have
me do the photos for the web site he was getting up. Was a nice
Nice shot, P.J. Judging by your comments, you would seem to be a
railfan. Are you a NYNHH fan?
Glen
On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:19 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I had to be in the center of Milford a much bigger shore town, but as
self consciously quaint as Stony Creek is still mostly un-self
results, you need to print it one real
silver based BW paper or scan them and print them yourself. Or you
need
to find a lab that really knows what they're doing to get decent
results
on Color Print paper.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I forgot to ask: is all C-41 processing the same? I ask because
Hi all,
Since I have a new, more advanced body, the N80, I tried taking
some shots I would have avoided in the past. The results were awful--
not one good shot on the entire role, a miserable 0-for-24 (Kodak
Gold 200).
In the past, I would avoid two types of shots: 1) indoor shots and 2)
Here is a correctly stated issue #2:
2) On the outdoor high sun shots, the camera turned seemingly minor
shadows (through the viewfinder) on the subject's face into black
blobs that covered almost all of the subject's face.
I sometimes have a tendency toward the typo ;-)
Glen
--
PDML
Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: Disappointing Results
Hi all,
Since I have a new, more advanced body, the N80, I tried taking
some shots I would have avoided in the past. The results were
awful--
not one good shot on the entire role
wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi all,
Since I have a new, more advanced body, the N80, I tried taking
some shots I would have avoided in the past. The results were
awful--
not one good shot on the entire role, a miserable 0-for-24 (Kodak
Gold 200).
In the past, I would avoid two types
selectable exposure stop increments.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam, for your detailed commentary. Also, I thank
everyone else who has responded--even the fellow who said I should
have bought a Pentax (Dave, I think) :-)
Adam: I tried dialing-in the -0.7 FEC value you suggest
Thanks, Scott. I have some Fuji Neopan Acros 100 on hand. What do
you recommend in traditional BW 400?
Glen
On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I forgot to ask: is all C-41 processing the same? I ask because on
my C-41 BW I had processed at Wal-Mart
corrections on a per-
emulsion basis. Most 1-hour labs can't be bothered to print correctly.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I forgot to ask: is all C-41 processing the same? I ask because on
my C-41 BW I had processed at Wal-Mart, some of the whites have a
bit of a purplish tone. My
Yes, I know what you mean. I recently purchased an OEM hood for one
of my lenses. I have been inclined to use just a filter, and so I
have already forgotten to use the hood on several outdoor shots.
When I go out, I must think hood, think hood. :-)
Glen
On Sep 30, 2007, at 6:27 AM,
? Or do
you have a fast lens? I hope your bath picture comes out well :)
rg2
On 9/29/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Fuji is very good, particularly in dim lighting (this was my
experience with the 800 speed variety). Wow, you shoot down to 1/4
with the 400 speed
in essentially the same condition, although the
warning card had been removed (And placed in the box). And I was
the 3rd
owner. But it was in KEH LN shape when I got it (And I payed LN prices
for it, $450CDN with LN grip, in box)
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Yes, it appears to be NOS. It came
removed (And placed in the box). And I was
the 3rd
owner. But it was in KEH LN shape when I got it (And I payed LN prices
for it, $450CDN with LN grip, in box)
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Yes, it appears to be NOS. It came with everything--from warranty
card to plastic wrappings...even
Yes, Fuji is very good, particularly in dim lighting (this was my
experience with the 800 speed variety). Wow, you shoot down to 1/4
with the 400 speed...no blur? I loaded a roll of the 400 in my
camera today. I just took a picture of my one year-old getting a
bath, and I I thought I
Adam: I do not know if you were able to read a post I wrote a couple
of days ago regarding my N80 body purchase, but, anyway, I received
the body and am quite impressed. I thought the smallish viewfinder
magnification (supposedly .75x) might be a hinderance, but I find
that, so far, the
Yes, Godfrey, more stuff ;-) They also seemed even a bit heavier
than some of the film SLRs I have held. How does your K10D feel? I
do not know the size of your hand, but how does the thickness feel to
you?
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 28, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Yes, most
to be too
small, but I'm used to the larger F100, F2, F3 and my Mamiya 645 kit.
And yes, Digitals tend to be a bit thicker, they need the extra
thickness for the LCD, main circuit board and sensor.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Adam: I do not know if you were able to read a post I wrote
it. It's not a
small camera, but it is simply one of the best handling AF cameras
ever. And it delivers incredible performance in a small package (To
get similar performance from most other cameras would require a
large battery grip)
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I was not aware
Hi all,
Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer,
Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am
wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400
speeds offered by both brands.
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
-On button, it takes 6
AA's or a dedicated rechargable pack vs the 4 AA's that the body's
AA carrier takes).
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you for the detailed commentary, Adam.
Wow, the N80 feels like flimsy plastic compared to the F100. Since
I have gotten the N80, I have been
will be
announced.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
True, but I purchased a brand new N80 and MB-16 for the price I
indicated--with box, manual, etc.--and the price also included
shipping. Whenever I could, I tend to prefer buying new.
Glen
On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Glen
are the Portra's and 100/400UC, all of which are 'Pro'
films.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi all,
Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer,
Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am
wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400
speeds
-is-purple color variance.
Glen
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Get a scanner, and you can do the same with your film stuff. All my
film
work (and I'm only shooting film now) is scanned and printed with an
inkjet. It works pretty well for me.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Digital SLR Guide News - Best Budget DSLR
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:16:04 -0700
Glen Tortorella wrote:
While I have been resistant to digital for quite some time, I find
this article interesting. The idea of getting a good budget DSLR
has
as much ink).
For scanners, I'd look at the Epson 4490 with a pair of
Betterscanning.com 35mm ANR inserts, or a used Minolta Scan Dual
III or IV and a copy of Vuescan (The minolta software doesn't work
on 10.4, it will work on 10.3)
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam. I
/display/
Tom C.
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Digital SLR Guide News - Best Budget DSLR
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:41:09 -0400
Has my lack of knowledge in regard to digital
). The scanners in them are really only
suitable for documents and prints, I wouldn't even bother trying to
get decent neg/slide scans out of them.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam. How do you feel about the all-in-one printers? The
Canon PIXMA MP810 and Epson RX680 look
-100x as much
ink).
For scanners, I'd look at the Epson 4490 with a pair of
Betterscanning.com 35mm ANR inserts, or a used Minolta Scan Dual
III or IV and a copy of Vuescan (The minolta software doesn't work
on 10.4, it will work on 10.3)
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Adam. I
probably the better buy.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
This is valuable feedback, Adam. I am a bit confused with regard to
the hierarchy of the D40 and D50. Which is the newer model (or were
they released at the same time)? Also, which is higher up in the
line? I have been under
Micro.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Adam--sorry for the late reply on this, but I have read (in more than
one place) that the D40 will not accept the F-series D Nikkor
lenses. What do you think of this? I ask because I have an F 50/1.8
D...which is a rather nice lens. Also, would the D40x
What a timely post, Larry!
While I have been resistant to digital for quite some time, I find
this article interesting. The idea of getting a good budget DSLR
has crossed my mind, but I know so little about working within the
DSLR format that I cannot get motivated to buy one. I tend to
Thanks, P.J. Would my A 50/2 work with the Pentax digital bodies--
i.e. the K100D?
Glen
On Sep 25, 2007, at 7:23 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh yes the question how does the K100D compare to the D40 or D50?
Favorably.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
What a timely post, Larry!
While I have been
and camera body?
Thanks again,
Glen
On Sep 25, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
prints. Thus, I ask the supremely elementary question: how does one
turn the zeros and ones stored in the DSLR's memory into prints?
Several options:
1) A laser or inkjet printer
the K100D and the D50. Liked the K100D better
for the
most part, missed the D50's larger buffer though.
P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh yes the question how does the K100D compare to the D40 or D50?
Favorably.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
What a timely post, Larry!
While I have been resistant
the question how does the K100D compare to the D40 or D50?
Favorably.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
What a timely post, Larry!
While I have been resistant to digital for quite some time, I find
this article interesting. The idea of getting a good budget DSLR
has crossed my mind, but I know so little
, but then there are those hidden costs...ink,
paper, software, and who knows what else...
Perhaps this is why I have tried to remain ignorant of the DSLR world.
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
While I have been resistant to digital
Hi all,
I am thinking of getting a flash for my ZX-M. It would be for
general indoor use and perhaps for some fill use. The Pentax AF280T
looks like a good choice. Any other recommendations?
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi all,
Is there any way to sign off from the list for a brief period? I
will be away for a week, and thought it might be better if I avoid
having 1000 or more unread messages in my inbox when I return home.
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Unfortunately, this is a rather typical story. I have been in shops
where I have felt I was speaking a different language...perhaps these
clerks speak only NiCan and Digispeak.
Glen
On Sep 8, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Y. Rowe wrote:
I'd support local shops if they carried my preferred
An improvement over the NiCan hype, for sure.
Glen
On Sep 9, 2007, at 9:26 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
At least the places I go have bags emblazoned with the relatively
neutral Kodak.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
grin My local store that does stock some decent Pentax gear always
sends me out of the
I agree with whoever replied (I think PJ) that dust or dirt in the
viewfinder is somewhat irritating. To reiterate, I have checked over
the various relevant parts (including the mirror) of my Super Program
and cannot find the specks I see in the viewfinder. Is there any way
to get them
. A good repair man can
usually clean it up. You could do it yourself but a slip of a
screwdriver could mar the surface of your focusing screen which is
infinitely more annoying...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I agree with whoever replied (I think PJ) that dust or dirt in the
viewfinder is somewhat
, and if you have a shop
nearby
with an in house repair guy. If they have to send it out you might as
well get a CLA because you'll end up paying for one.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thanks, PJ. Have you ever done this? If I bring it to a shop, I
gather this would be a rather inexpensive repair?
Glen
to get rid of the
dust.
all in good fun :o)
rg2
On 9/9/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with whoever replied (I think PJ) that dust or dirt in the
viewfinder is somewhat irritating. To reiterate, I have checked over
the various relevant parts (including the mirror
are much older or have user replaceable screens, or
both.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I know that before I bought the camera, it was professionally
serviced. It had new seals installed. I do have a set of small
screwdrivers. What would I have to remove, etc.?
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 9, 2007
it rank?
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 9, 2007, at 12:14 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Good question, I don't even know where to look on your camera, all the
Pentax's I own are much older or have user replaceable screens, or
both.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I know that before I bought the camera
Yes, maybe you should call Big Brother :-)
Glen
On Sep 8, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Oh no! An army of nutjobs.
Of course, some folks are maniacal collectors. There are a lot of
50's
out there, so cornering the market might be tricky. Unless he's going
to combine them
Hi all,
I have a question for those who own earlier Pentax models--those
bodies with a maximum shutter speed of 1/1000. Do you folks find
this limiting--both in terms of your corresponding aperture choices
and in terms of action photography?
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Tortorella
Sent: 08 September 2007 21:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Speed Range of Earlier Pentax Bodies
Hi all,
I have a question for those who own earlier Pentax models
Hi Adam,
Recently, I have gotten some rolls of non-C41 BW, some Fuji Acros
100. I see you mention mailers here, indicating that they are
cheaper. What (or who) do you recommend for developing these
prints? I would like to be economical--but get good quality--and a
mailer would be fine.
with 2
inversions per minute. Should run you about $0.60 or less per roll
(including stop fix) if you 1-shot the dev and reuse stop fix.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi Adam,
Recently, I have gotten some rolls of non-C41 BW, some Fuji Acros
100. I see you mention mailers here
Thank you very much, Scott. I have been wanting to try developing my
own prints, but I have feared doing so. I tend to be a
perfectionist, and I fear disappointment. I do not have the
equipment, either. What would I need? It would be great to have
someone show me the correct way of
film scanner?
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 7, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you very much, Scott. I have been wanting to try developing my
own prints, but I have feared doing so. I tend to be a
perfectionist, and I fear disappointment. I do not have
I agree: ouch.
Glen
On Sep 7, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Rebekah wrote:
I saw a lens on Ebay for a 67 camera listed at almost $1000. Is that
for real? ouch.
rg2
On 9/7/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz,
So you got that one! Good searching techniques.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/7/07,
Toralf,
I do have two 50mm lenses already, but I may be interested in your A
50/1.7. I see you say it is in nice condition. I am new to the
list, and so can you be more precise? Do you have both caps for it?
Where are you located?
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Toralf Lund
I have done it many times. It is much easier when holding the camera
with one's hands.
Glen
On Sep 7, 2007, at 3:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea what you're asking. You said the movie folk make it
look easy. I tried to explain that while it may look easy in the
finished
Thanks...
I have an iMac, and none of the internal links work when I click on
them. I did not try the external links.
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
It's up! Congratulations to GDG :-)
http://www.pentaxian.com
Btw, there's a link to PDML from there (the cap
Hi all,
Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
about the longevity of these little flashes.
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, G.
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Be sure you update to Flash Player v9 on whatever platform you're
using...
G
On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thanks...
I have an iMac, and none of the internal links work when I click on
them. I
I tend to agree. I find that when shooting a moving subject (i.e. a
train), it is almost impossible to frame correctly when using a tripod.
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Rebekah wrote:
http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm
With use, it (or your own version) becomes second nature.
...). I have to hold
it up to use it...but it works.
Bong
On 9/6/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
about the longevity of these little
. Alling wrote:
Yes, they're a week point, they break...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
about the longevity of these little flashes.
Thanks,
Glen
I own...I have had my ZX-
M body for over three years, and the plastic mount still looks as it
did when I first took the body out of the box.
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up
opportunities to break, and when you need just a little bit of
extra
light, it's there.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thanks, P.J...
In view of this, I question the decision to include these flashes on
camera bodies. Obviously, no pro would use such a flash. For the
rest of us, I say
, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
I tend to agree. I find that when shooting a moving subject (i.e. a
train), it is almost impossible to frame correctly when using a
tripod.
In many cases it is certainly not sensible to use a tripod for moving
subject
Hi all,
I finally put a lens on my Super Program. When I look through the
viewfinder, I see a few specks there. The outside of the viewfinder
seems to show no dirt or dust. I cleaned the lens, too, and it looks
good. Thus, are these specks inside the viewfinder? Will this be a
/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I finally put a lens on my Super Program. When I look through the
viewfinder, I see a few specks there. The outside of the viewfinder
seems to show no dirt or dust. I cleaned the lens, too, and it looks
good. Thus, are these specks inside
screw mount
bodies floating around that I don't use enough as it is, not to
mention
the other cameras, I've accumulated over the years, otherwise I might
have kept both).
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I have just posted
some further thoughts
or the ZX5n?
Thanks again,
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:52 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Pretty much, the only thing the M has going for it is it's split image
focus aid, which I've learned to not use anyway...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you for the detailed comments. Hence, I gather your vote in my
M vs
here).
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Toralf. While the problem may seem minor, I still say:
why have a rather useless (and perhaps inoperable) flash atop my
body? Things such as these tend to irritate me.
Yeah, I know what
screw things
up. Learn to love them:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I finally put a lens on my Super Program. When I look through the
viewfinder, I see a few specks there. The outside of the viewfinder
seems
body)...unless it were inhibiting my skill development
in some way. Advice is welcome.
Thanks again,
Glen
On Sep 4, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Is multi-segment metering always better than center-weighted
metering? My ZX-M has TTL multi (2)-segment
this
dammed focus.
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Bob,
Thank you for your opinion. I was thinking that this may be a
matter
of preference, and your comments helped to clarify the issue.
Hence,
will I be unnecessarily confusing myself by having both cameras
in my
arsenal (one with center
These are excellent comments, Brendan. You highlight many important
issues we Pentaxians face...and things we feel.
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 4, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
So, after my fruitless search for the 16-50mm f2.8
over the last coupe of days (except for the 5
available
is to get a MZ-5n instead of another MZ-M. In these days,
they shouldn't be that much difference in price between them.
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: miércoles, 5 de septiembre, 2007 15:30:47
Asunto
Thanks...does the ZX-5n accept the FG battery pack (AA, like on the
ZX-M)?
Thanks again,
Glen
On Sep 5, 2007, at 10:07 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:03:25 -0700 (PDT), Jaume Lahuerta wrote
Normally there is a setting that lets you switch between
multisegment, CW and
Thanks very much, Adam...
This is good news, as I like the FG pack. Is there any difference
between the ZX-5 and the ZX-5n?
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 5, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Yes.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thanks...does the ZX-5n accept the FG battery pack (AA, like
Hi all,
Is it true that both Fuji and Kodak have announced plans to stop
producing film? A dealer mentioned this to me, and I would like to
know if it is true.
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
the battery pack (I would say that all the
MZ's except for the MZ-S accept it...)
Regards,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: miércoles, 5 de septiembre, 2007 16:46:13
Asunto: Re: Metering
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
