.
On July 26, 2017 11:30:39 AM PDT, Beth Zuckerman <zuckermanb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The first thing I tried was updating the app. The camera is an Olymps
E-M5
Mark II.
Thanks,
Beth
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
Beth Zuckerman wrote:
I already h
DNG Converter works on a folder of images but you can convert a single file if
the folder only contains one image.
The problem could be a compatibility issue. I'm away from my PC at present but,
if I recall correctly, you need to select (in the preferences) the correct
compatibility for whatever
wrote:
Beth Zuckerman wrote:
I already had Adobe DNG converter installed. The files I
copied to my
computer are grayed out when I try to open them in it. I
tried updating
the app, and that did not help.
g I tried was updating the app. The camera is an Olymps
>E-M5
>Mark II.
>
>Thanks,
>Beth
>
>On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Beth Zuckerman wrote:
>>
>>> I already had Adobe DNG converter
On 4/16/2014 6:13 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:54, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd watch?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
On 16/04/2014 4:56 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd watch?
I am so in. We could call it
That's tweaking not twerking, right?
ann
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
I'm in!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode.
Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
That's tweaking not twerking, right?
ann
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
I have just been violently reminded that covering one's
On 16/04/2014 9:31 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
I have just
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:31 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking,
On 16/04/2014 10:06 AM, Bruce wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Alas, poor Yorick! I twerked him, Horatio.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
To Twerk or not to Twerk, that is the question.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 10:06 AM, Bruce wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Alas, poor Yorick! I twerked him, Horatio.
--
PDML
On Apr 16, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just been violently reminded that covering one's eyes does
nothing to prevent unwanted mental images.
MARK!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 16/04/2014 10:46 AM, Bruce wrote:
To Twerk or not to Twerk, that is the question.
Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness
twerked upon them.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just reached new
heights (or is that lows?) of farce.
I'm not complaining, mind.
You guys are all effing mad. 'Twerk' is where a Yorkshireman goes every
morning.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 16 Apr 2014, at 19:43, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:54, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just reached
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but
On 2014-04-16 18:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
And listening to electronic music by Kraftwerk.
Possibly my favorite Kraftwerk lyric:
Die Fahrbahn ist ein graues Band
Weisse Streifen, grüner Rand
It scans really well, and it agrees with my inner driver, though on
track we do have some Gelbe
Just an twerkish observation
Is that the language they speak in twerky?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
Subject: Re: DNG converter
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
I have an older mac OSX 10.6.8 with LR version 4.1. I know this would
not have support say oh i don't know say a Fuji XT-1 raw file. Would
LR4 at least know its not a file it can deal with and let me convert
to DNG to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use
not a file it can deal with and let me convert
to DNG to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use in LR4.
Dave (just looking) Brooks
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an older mac OSX 10.6.8 with LR version 4.1. I know this would
not have support say oh i don't know say a Fuji XT-1 raw file. Would
LR4 at least know its not a file it can deal with and let me convert
to DNG to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG
don't know say a Fuji XT-1 raw file. Would
LR4 at least know its not a file it can deal with and let me convert
to DNG to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use in LR4.
Dave (just looking) Brooks
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more
support say oh i don't know say a Fuji XT-1 raw file. Would
LR4 at least know its not a file it can deal with and let me convert
to DNG to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use in LR4.
Dave (just looking) Brooks
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario
On 15/4/14, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have an older mac OSX 10.6.8
Hey mate not that old! My MacBook Pro is 2010 running 10.6.8 and it does
everything I need and runs all my professional software :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web
to use in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use in LR4.
Dave (just looking) Brooks
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario
on 2014-04-15 8:48 David J Brooks wrote
has anyone upgraded from snow leopard 10.6.8 to maverick. What
glitches should i expect, programs that will not work. I have CS1
running with a second program, forget the name, so it will work, i
suppose that will not work now. My Epson 2400 printer and
On 15/04/2014 12:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once the order of the bit patterns is known they all work the
same way. However Foveon and what ever Fuji X-trans sensors are enough
different to require lots of special
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/04/2014 12:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once the order of the bit patterns is known they all work the
same way. However Foveon and what
In the Fuji community, there are certain people who are totally snotty
about the ACR/Lightroom processing of the X-trans raw files and would
only use one of these niche products. I look at their example shots
and can’t see the difference myself
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bill
the difference myself
My main reason for asking was after reading the dpreview of the X-T1
and it mentioned something about the Adobe conversions were better
than supplied software. If such a file will work on LR 4 with my
10.6.8 OS be it readable by LR4 or a DNG converter not regurgitate a
OS
be it readable by LR4 or a DNG converter not regurgitate a
OS upgrade, beauti.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/04/2014 12:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once
on 2014-04-15 18:17 Tim Bray wrote
Alternately, all the Fuji X-cam reviews say they make JPEGs that are
really excellent, to the extent that RAW might be superfluous. So
maybe no big deal.
i often see this kind of statement (not just for Fuji), and i am puzzled — in
what world would an 8-bit
Well, they do look pleasing to the eye. In particular, the X-cams’
auto-white-balance is frighteningly good, I basically never go near
that control in Lr, and WB correction is one place where you can fix
things in RAW that you just can’t in JPEG. But yeah, I don’t find
the idea tempting either.
So you always accept the WB that the camera hands you? A so-called
accurate WB is not necessarily what a given scene calls for in the
final rendered shot. You would not be tempted ever to add warmth or
coolness for artistic reasons?
I do, all the time. I would never accept that I can only use
To the extent I have a photo ideology, it’s “make the picture look
like what I saw” and the Fuji does an amazingly good job of that out
of the box, whereas with my Pentaxes up through the K-5, I often have
had to tweak the WB to achieve it. Pretty well the only time I touch
it with the Fuji is
or a DNG converter not regurgitate a
OS upgrade, beauti.
The supplied software is silky pix.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 15/04/2014 7:38 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
So you always accept the WB that the camera hands you? A so-called
accurate WB is not necessarily what a given scene calls for in the
final rendered shot. You would not be tempted ever to add warmth or
coolness for artistic reasons?
Honestly, I
in LR4 or do i need the separate DNG converter from
Adobe, convert and use in LR4.
Dave (just looking) Brooks
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
For those wanting to convert other file formats into DNG (e.g. for using RAW
files of newer cameras with older releases of Photoshop), the latest
software from Adobe is available.
Windows:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=5519fileID=5528
Mac:
Support for the following cameras has been added in this update.
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Nikon D7000
Nikon Coolpix P7000
Nikon D3100
Olympus E-5
Panasonic DMC-GF2
Panasonic DMC-GH2
Pentax K-5
Pentax K-r
Samsung NX100
Samsung TL350 (WB2000)
Sony A560
Sony A580
Last night's release of Lightroom 3.3, Camera Raw 6.3 and the free
standalone DNG Converter utility adds support for the K-5 and K-r. Some
other brands (Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus) were mentioned too.
http://goo.gl/qqRu1
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Heck i just bought the CD for LR3 but no computer to put it on just
yet. Might have LR3.5.:-)
Dave
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Last night's release of Lightroom 3.3, Camera Raw 6.3 and the free
standalone DNG Converter utility adds support
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Last night's release of Lightroom 3.3, Camera Raw 6.3 and the free
standalone DNG Converter utility adds support for the K-5 and K-r. Some
other brands (Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus) were mentioned too.
http
On 10-12-07 9:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Last night's release of Lightroom 3.3, Camera Raw 6.3 and the free
standalone DNG Converter utility adds support for the K-5 and K-r. Some
other brands (Canon, Nikon
Thanks Godfrey. I always wonder why, release after release, year after year,
they fail to put the DNG converter where they link you. Follow the link to
Camera RAW + DNG Converter and you get the Camera RAW alone. One must use
their link as a simple reminder of the availability of the converter
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter v6.3,Lightroom 3.3 updates
now available
Thanks Godfrey. I always wonder why
On 7 December 2010 12:56, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
- Original Message - From: Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter v6.3
I wrote:
Not to speak of the grossly overextimated time for downloading.
They tell you:
2 hrs, 19 mins @ 56K modem
18 mins, 49 secs @ DSL
4 mins, 42 secs @ T1
While it took me about 1 minute with my DSL connection.
Perhaps above estimates apply to the supposed Camera RAW + DNG Converter
, Camera Raw + DNG Converter, through
the various revisions for the OS platform you want. Same for
Photoshop, Photoshop Lightroom, etc.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Thanks Godfrey. I always wonder why, release after release, year after year
A question for the DNG experts...
Alongside the PEF-files I have a bundle of XMPs. When running the DNG
converter, will the info from those XMPs be embedded into the DNG
files?
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
of XMPs. When running the DNG
converter, will the info from those XMPs be embedded into the DNG
files?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
preset to cyanotype renderings. I
then used the Metadata-Save Metadata to Files command. This created
the three .xmp files next to the native RAW files. I then exited
Lightroom and ran DNG Converter on the folder containing those native
RAW files with their .xmp sidecars, outputting DNGs
then exited
Lightroom and ran DNG Converter on the folder containing those native
RAW files with their .xmp sidecars, outputting DNGs to another folder.
When I opened Bridge on the output folder, all the metadata was
incorporated into the .DNG files ... keywords and cyanotype rendering.
So
RAW files. I then exited
Lightroom and ran DNG Converter on the folder containing those native
RAW files with their .xmp sidecars, outputting DNGs to another folder.
When I opened Bridge on the output folder, all the metadata was
incorporated into the .DNG files ... keywords and cyanotype
them in a primary directory, convert the pef's to
dng's and put them in whatever directory you specify (assuming you have
DNG Converter installed), create copies of all the originals on the card
and put them in a backup directory - you can specify both a primary and
a secondary backup directory
I want to automate my backup/conversion flow, and I dont know if you
guys have ever run across any tools that do this. Basically I take
the images from the file, if they are PEF, I convert them with Adobe's
DNG converter, save the PEF files in a negatives directory, back
that up, then put the DNG
DNG Converter installed), create copies of all the originals on the card
and put them in a backup directory - you can specify both a primary and
a secondary backup directory. You can try it free for 30 days to see if
it's what you want.
There's also an SDK available that will let you write more
any tools that do this. Basically I take
the images from the file, if they are PEF, I convert them with Adobe's
DNG converter, save the PEF files in a negatives directory, back
that up, then put the DNG in my working area. If the original is a
JPG, then I just skip the conversion stage
this would be preferable from
using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter...
Because Adobe's current DNG converter doesn't recognize PEF files
from
the K100D?
Not sure but I read it does... just that it is not officially
supported.
It doesn't without editing the PEF's to change
Hello,
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
Thanks
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
David Weiss wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
In the Photo Browser, right
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
Thanks
Dave
using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter...
Patrice
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam Maas wrote:
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can
Indeed. it will work with next update I guess.
2006/9/23, David Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam Maas wrote:
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand
this would be preferable from using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter...
Because Adobe's current DNG converter doesn't recognize PEF files from
the K100D?
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
didn't see DNG listed in the File Types box of the File Save As dialog box.
... though I don't clearly see why this would be preferable from using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter...
Because Adobe's current DNG converter doesn't recognize PEF files from
the K100D
The Pentax software is write-only with DNG's. Which is a good thing, as
the only thing it's useful for is DNG conversion.
-Adam
David Weiss wrote:
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam
, and one of the options
that appears will be Save as DNG. There may be other ways, too, but I
didn't see DNG listed in the File Types box of the File Save As dialog box.
... though I don't clearly see why this would be preferable from using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter
using
the free and fully automated Adobe DNG Converter...
Because Adobe's current DNG converter doesn't recognize PEF files
from
the K100D?
Not sure but I read it does... just that it is not officially
supported.
It doesn't without editing the PEF's to change the camera identifier
with the latest version of DNG
Converter, however: that's version 3.4. This is a standalone
application, and is not dependent upon Camera Raw. The output of DNG
Converter 3.4 is fully compatible with Camera Raw 2.4.
A typical PEF file of 10.1Mbtyes from the *ist DS converts to a DNG
file
with the latest version of DNG
Converter, however: that's version 3.4. This is a standalone
application, and is not dependent upon Camera Raw. The output of DNG
Converter 3.4 is fully compatible with Camera Raw 2.4.
A typical PEF file of 10.1Mbtyes from the *ist DS converts to a DNG
file
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Powell
solution 1: Sort the PEF files into a subfolder. Open DNG Converter,
set source to the subfolder and destination to the same folder as the
other DNG files.
solution 2: Let it do it's thing on all the files, than delete the
redundant files with a properly executed wildcard file parameter
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Yes, it's quite simple. Grasp the power cord that connects your cpu
to a folder which has DNG
files
in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Powell
AM
Subject: DNG Converter converts DNGs
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Powell
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Yes - don't put the DNG files in the same
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
John Francis wrote:
Yes - don't put the DNG
Just a quick question about DNG.
I use CS, and I can't find any reference to the DNG format. Is this a CS2
feature only? Also, how much space is saved with using DNG?
Thanks.
Hi Gang,
I've been trying to upgrade the DNG converter that I'm using to 3.2 or 3.3,
but the Adobe store has been having difficulties and I can't download the
programs.
I was hoping someone here has either or both of the DNG converters that
they could send by email or post to a personal site
are done.
Igor
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:41:23 -0800
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang,
I've been trying to upgrade the DNG converter that I'm using to 3.2 or 3.3,
but the Adobe store has been having difficulties and I can't download the
programs.
I was hoping someone here has either or both of the DNG
Thanks to everyone who responded. I've got the needed files now
Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff
I've been trying to upgrade the DNG converter that I'm using to 3.2 or
3.3,
but the Adobe store has been having difficulties and I can't download the
programs.
I
Just posted on the Adobe DNG forum:
Adobe will release the DNG 2.4 converter at the same
time as the final release of the Camera Raw 2.4 plug-in.
No announced schedule yet, but it will probably be
sometime before the public beta expires (end of Feb).
97 matches
Mail list logo
