This is a gallery I put together from pictures already posted to my
color photoblog. Color is not my thing, but I've been playing with it
a bit, on and off.
For those who didn't mind the flash interface:
http://jbuhler.com/f/colb/index.html
And for those who prefer html with thumbnails:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:11 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Meetining went ok i suppose.
I'm still structured.
Good to hear.
- Dave the disestablishee
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Now, they're fencing off river and canal harbours in the German and
Belgian hinterlands. Roll out the barbed wire and bring up the CCTV
cams! No more loopholes for those nasty terrorists to capture a river
barge and set sail to cross
On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
In that case, my gear must be gaining value as antiques.
Speaking as an expert in the field (or at least an expert by marriage;
my wife works at the Computer History Museum) it's a rare piece of
computer equipment that's worth more than scrap
On 12/9/06, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
My archives thank dog for the Adobe DNG convertor.
Bill's Rottie? Or you got a new puppy? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 11/9/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I love the idea of having just one extra battery, topped off and
ready to go. hit the road, shoot until #1 is exhausted, and
(surprise!) battery #2 is still fully charged and ready for the next
stream of photos.
No more fumbling
On 12/9/06, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let's hope Pentax has had the
foresight to try to keep everyone happy, that would be a coupe in this
day and age.
Actually more of a ute ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 12/9/06, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Scrap metal unloading at the river Sambre, flowing right through the
middle of the Thy-Marcinelle steel mill at Charleroi, Belgium:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6641671
Your comments and suggestions are as
Now, they're fencing off river and canal harbours in the German
and
Belgian hinterlands. Roll out the barbed wire and bring up the
CCTV
cams! No more loopholes for those nasty terrorists to
capture a river
barge and set sail to cross the seas!
Our port was fenced off years ago after
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll buy two batteries and never be out of power.
Mark!
That phrase would _haunt_ me...
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more
Mark what you're doing is torture :D
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I did boot my PC with a CF card.
The thing is NOT to let it swap on the CF otherwise, it will quickly
go away. Otherwise it is VERY fast. I booted a small Linuw distro on a
32MB CF. The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit smaller.
2006/9/12, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Sep 11,
I did boot my PC with a CF card.
The thing is NOT to let it swap on the CF otherwise, it will quickly
go away. Otherwise it is VERY fast. I booted a small Linuw distro on a
32MB CF. The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit smaller.
I meant The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit FASTER
There's nothing there to search.
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/11 Mon PM 11:26:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Up an aisle on the Upper Nile
mike wilson wrote:
Nothing there.
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Yes - really top shot. I particularly like the sharpness of the reticulated
patten on the wing and the grains of yellow pollen on the legs.
A very busy little bugger.
How do you like the 50 mm on the DL? I have a 90 mm Tamron that I like a lot
on the DS but I've recently obtained an old
Thanks mate. The lens is good, but I'd love to have a longer focal length.
It's hard to get shots of moving creatures with the 50mm as you have to get
physically close. I did manage to spend about 3 hours harrassing the bees
in the garden today without getting stung though. :)
- Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of mike wilson
Sent: 12 September 2006 08:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D Weight
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll buy two batteries and never be out of power.
I use the same lens on an ist D with a Tokina Auto Doubler.
Don
J and K Messervy wrote:
Thanks mate. The lens is good, but I'd love to have a longer focal length.
It's hard to get shots of moving creatures with the 50mm as you have to get
physically close. I did manage to spend about 3
Excellent picture. Lovely light and sharp as a tack.
John
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:15:04 +0100, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks mate. The lens is good, but I'd love to have a longer focal
length.
It's hard to get shots of moving creatures with the 50mm as you have to
I've got some Plutonium and graphite blocks you can borrow, at a pinch.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/12 Tue AM 09:30:34 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: K10D Weight
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 9/11/2006 3:58:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scrap metal unloading at the river Sambre, flowing right through the
middle of the Thy-Marcinelle steel mill at Charleroi, Belgium:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6641671
Your
In a message dated 9/11/2006 10:00:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spring has finally sprung here in the Southern Hemisphere, so I'd thought
I'd try my first PESO post. This was shot with my Sigma 50mm manual focus
macro on the *istDL.
http://tinyurl.com/pbb7h
Cheers
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have two. The other one I charged three months ago and is still
100% on the meter.
Thanks, it sounds good. I currently use Lithium AAs (non
rechargeable) on the MZ-S and the hungry beast known as AF500FTZ. 3
months sounds acceptable.
Kostas
--
Possibly, but that rumour hasn't been officially announced.
g
Dave
On 9/12/06, Ken Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously someone thought enough was enough.
Did I hear the rumour that the rumour of 9/14 press release is also a
On Sep 11, 2006, at 23:48, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:51:56PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Matt Kelch wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
I detest lame NiMh batteries that self-discharge at such an
alarming
rate that I always have to reach for the
That always grossed me out.
And it still does
Dave ;-)
On 9/12/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've known about Mike for a few years, but last night I learned that he had
his own web site. Mike was an amazing chicken!
http://www.miketheheadlesschicken.org/story.html
Shel
--
Excellent. You nailed the focus. Not an easy thing to do.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2006, at 1:00 AM, J and K Messervy wrote:
Spring has finally sprung here in the Southern Hemisphere, so I'd
thought
I'd try my first PESO post. This was shot with my Sigma 50mm manual
focus
macro on the *istDL.
Juan Buhler wrote:
This is a gallery I put together from pictures already posted to my
color photoblog. Color is not my thing, but I've been playing with it
a bit, on and off.
For those who didn't mind the flash interface:
http://jbuhler.com/f/colb/index.html
And for those who prefer
Well done. I like the highly saturated look. And you were able to make
it a constant element here. Quite a few of these would only work well
as color. That's a good thing.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:37 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
This is a gallery I put together from pictures already posted to my
On 12/09/06, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm Energizer 2500s are the batteries of disappointment that I
have been using for the past year. Hmm
You do have to charge them you know wink, wink ;-)
What charger do you use?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 12/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of
CF? These devices will work just fine in SD cards too.
Sure but the point is whatever the current density of chips the CF
card will physically hold about 4x more than SD.
--
and is ok to go up to 137GB ...
2006/9/12, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of
CF? These devices will work just fine in SD cards too.
Sure but the point is whatever
mike wilson wrote:
There's nothing there to search.
Sorry, I was trying to get just the single 'blog post but boneheaded it.
Use this URL and search the page of one goat or scan down to
September 5, 2006.
Language warning still applies.
On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:00, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 12/09/06, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm Energizer 2500s are the batteries of disappointment that I
have been using for the past year. Hmm
You do have to charge them you know wink, wink ;-)
What charger do
On 12.09.2006, at 14:16 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
Sure but the point is whatever the current density of chips the CF
card will physically hold about 4x more than SD.
So what? You said you wouldn't use 8GB card because of risk of losing
too many photos at once, and this capacity is already
I use Energizer 2500's and the Energizer 15 minute charger, which usually
takes 10 minutes or less.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:35 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
You too, eh? I got a TurboColor Slab awhile back and put a virgin
OpenStep 4.2 install on it. Wish I had the correct cables to connect to
the sound boxes and monitor. Really was a purdy machine.
I have two complete units at my desk,
Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could someone post a
link to where one may be available.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sylwester Pietrzyk
On 12/09/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what? You said you wouldn't use 8GB card because of risk of losing
too many photos at once, and this capacity is already available in SD
form ;-)
Oh no that wasn't me, I gave up my 4GB microdrive because I don't
trust drives, solid
On 12/09/06, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the Rayovac 1-hour charger which, 3-4 (??) years ago, got rave
reviews. Can't remember the specific model number but it's one that
charges each battery separately and all kinds of good stuff like that
(although not as slick as the
On 12/09/06, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could someone post a
link to where one may be available.
Yes there are but they slow down the fastest SD cards considerably,
On Sep 12, 2006, at 8:02, Digital Image Studio wrote:
I'm interested in the K10D but hope that it's AA compatible (like most
of the rest of my kit) as I've got eight good sets of 4 AA cells.
My AA's will go with the DS to either the wife or my daughter (so the
problem is out of my hands).
Thanks Rob,
I think I'll stick with the 1 gb CF card and 4 gb microdrive.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT Why CF is still
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
You too, eh? I got a TurboColor Slab awhile back and put a virgin
OpenStep 4.2 install on it. Wish I had the correct cables to connect to
the sound boxes and monitor. Really was a purdy machine.
I have two complete units at my desk,
On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Bob W wrote:
I'll buy two batteries and never be out of power.
That phrase would _haunt_ me...
Me too. So I bought 3. One in the camera, one charged and waiting, one
in the charger. ...
It must be said that I was referring to the R1 in that phrase.
In the
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Francis wrote:
Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
part of why its still around.
I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE.
It is. In fact, there are even passive adapters for CF-IDE
(being the
40-pin sort found
I wouldn't buy a charger that doesn't charge individual cells but I
wouldn't use one without a display either. I now use a BC-900 and each
time I buy 12 or so cells I run them through the refresh cycle then
match the sets based on charge capacity. My high capacity cells do
self discharge
I don't recall anyone saying that CF cards were no longer viable storage
devices, only that SD cards were replacing them in many cameras and were
becoming the more common - dare I say, standard - card. Were I to be
desirous of using a larger camera - like a 645 or a huge Nikon or Canon, CF
would
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 12/09/06, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could
someone post a
link to where one may be available.
Yes
Ah, that just because no one was packin'...
Norm
From: Bob W
snip
I saw a group of Muslim women veiled head-to-toe in black (on a bright
sunshiny day)
with metal grills across their eyes, sitting around having a picnic
with their very Western-looking children. Along the towpath came a
On 12/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recall anyone saying that CF cards were no longer viable storage
devices, only that SD cards were replacing them in many cameras and were
becoming the more common - dare I say, standard - card. Were I to be
desirous of using a
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/11/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've got a couple machines that I expect to climb in value over the next
10 years, but they're working NeXT slab's, which aren't exactly common
(only about 10,000 made).
You too, eh? I got a TurboColor Slab
Hi,
There are some great pics in the gallery. For the most part, the saturated
colors work very well, adding to the shapes, textures, and imagery created
by the images themselves. A few are outstanding ... keep working on the
technique. I think you're on to something.
Shel
[Original
On 9/12/06 9:31 AM, Charles Robinson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My AA's will go with the DS to either the wife or my daughter (so the
problem is out of my hands). :-)
You think so, but they might come back and haunt you! :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 12/09/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Similar or the same device is available from www.mittoni.com and
www.psism.com as well.
The device seems to have a maximum throughput rate equal to that of a
32x card.
Likely, mine is the Mittoni one.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
Dave was about the first on the list to go D-SLR. He now as so many that
we can not keep count of them. Surprised he would let one go grin.
Hey, Dave, I would be glad to take that off your hands on indefinite loan.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/11/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've got a couple machines that I expect to climb in value over the next
10 years, but they're working NeXT slab's, which aren't exactly common
(only about 10,000 made).
You too, eh? I got a
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
I'll give you that the Zeiss is longer and faster, but this one is
actually usable
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
The monitors are nothing special anymore. At the time they were
pretty high-resolution ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or so), but now you'd just need an
adapter to physically connect to a VGA monitor. That's how I got mine up
and running... soldered up
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
Oh and i forgot about this one, which is still available new:
http://tinyurl.com/z6vhv
--
Christian
That's a cracker! Amusing to see the small black blob of a Hasselblad on the
end of it.
Anyone know who commissioned it?
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/12 Tue PM 02:24:25 GMT
To: PDML PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Long, Fast Glass
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
At 10:38 PM 12/09/2006, Christian wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
That's a monster. I'd like to see Paul try and hold that one steady ;-)
Wonderful shot!
You did especially well considering the short focal length.
It's obviously easier in the Southern Hemisphere. LOL
Composition is, also, beautiful.
Jack
--- J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spring has finally sprung here in the Southern Hemisphere, so I'd
thought
Juan,
I love your work. :-)
A couple of comments:
- For those photos which are essentially a color reprise from what
you've presented in BW, I tend to prefer the BW rendering. Perhaps
this is because I've enjoyed them in the monochrome first and the
color seems distracting, perhaps it's
indeed.I have a CF - IDE adapter which is passive.
2006/9/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Francis wrote:
Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
part of why its still around.
I'm not sure about CF using or being a
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=searchQ=b=21a=157_1127a=706_6375mnp=0.0mxp=0.0cmpsrch=cltp=clsgr=Submit.x=9Submit.y=9Submit=Goshs=ci=1082ac=
http://tinyurl.com/hcrc3
$919 body only, 999 with 18-55
--
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Only if has a aperture ring!! ;)
-P
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
A=searchQ=b=21a=157_1127a=706_6375mnp=0.0mxp=0.0cmpsrch=cltp=
clsgr=Submit.x=9Submit.y=9Submit=Goshs=ci=1082ac=
http://tinyurl.com/hcrc3
$919 body only, 999 with 18-55
Yes, it's coming
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are
basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very adaptable.
Yes, it is not true. PCMCIA is more like ISA, so an adapter would have
electronics.
--
PDML
I wonder how many will asked to be notified when in stock?
Glad to see it offered allowing the choice of body only.
Jack
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Although virtually all of them are very pleasing and the set is a
very strong presentation, I particularly like these three:
http://jbuhler.com/html/colbimgp7662.html
Interesting - those are amongst my favorites as well. The deep colors
really work well with those photos ,,,
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Although virtually all of them are very pleasing and the set is a
very strong presentation, I particularly like these three:
When I was considering a DS2, the best price i could find was within about
$100.00 of the K10D. Based on what we know about the 10, this is a very
good price, especially since it come in under the Nikon D80 ;-))
I think a lot of current Pentax users are going to be very pleased with
this camera
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens,
given the super-sonic motor and fast aperture... Perhaps Pentax's
most expensive zoom?
Where has that be said ... can you provide a pointer?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Thibouille
16-50/2.8 is said to be about 1000 dollars.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Y'gotta start somewhere.
You've won the prize for being the first person to complain about the new
camera. I wondered how long it would take before complaints and criticisms
started.
What makes you think the upcoming 16-50/2.8 will have a super-sonic motor
- I don't recall seeing that
On Sep 12, 2006, at 8:55 AM, ryan brooks wrote:
Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are
basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very
adaptable.
Yes, it is not true. PCMCIA is more like ISA, so an adapter would
have
electronics.
Yes, it
Why wouldn't it be Body-Only. The K100D and K110D are available as such.
-Adam
Jack Davis wrote:
I wonder how many will asked to be notified when in stock?
Glad to see it offered allowing the choice of body only.
Jack
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16-50/2.8 is said to be about 1000 dollars.
2006/9/12, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens,
I remember it being said before on this list... '-)
G
On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Where has that be said ... can you provide a pointer?
16-50/2.8 is said to be about 1000 dollars.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:43, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Yes, it's coming soon.
$919 .. darn near what I paid for my first *ist DS. ;-)
*LESS* than I paid for mine (with kit lens, though). I think all
told, with taxes and (yes, I did it) extended warranty I paid about
$1100 for my DS.
I'm
Rumours and/or documents being circulated under the table. I know you love
rumours Shel ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel
Belinkoff
Sent: 12. september 2006 18:43
To: Pentax-Discuss
On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be weather sealed. ...
I fully expect that if they have gone the distance to a weather
sealed body,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:43:59AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
A=searchQ=b=21a=157_1127a=706_6375mnp=0.0mxp=0.0cmpsrch=cltp=
clsgr=Submit.x=9Submit.y=9Submit=Goshs=ci=1082ac=
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:15:28AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
Hmmm Energizer 2500s are the batteries of disappointment that I
have been using for the past year. Hmm
Oh, they work just fine (and I love the capacity; with a full set of
eight batteries, and the switch from
On 9/12/06 12:36 PM, Thibouille, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16-50/2.8 is said to be about 1000 dollars.
2006/9/12, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be
I like what you've posted.
Looks like you pulled of a successful combination of high saturation
subject matter.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO: Some color pics
This is a gallery I put together from pictures already posted to my
Mike Hamilton wrote:
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens,
given the super-sonic motor and fast aperture... Perhaps Pentax's
At this point, only for Windoze, though :-(
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just announced:
Elements 5.0 adds several new tools including Black
and White conversion,
Curves (at last!) and lens distortion correction.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091202adobeelements.asp
Just announced:
Elements 5.0 adds several new tools including Black and White conversion,
Curves (at last!) and lens distortion correction.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091202adobeelements.asp
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Scrap metal unloading at the river Sambre, flowing right through the
middle of the Thy-Marcinelle steel mill at Charleroi, Belgium:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6641671
Another fine photo, Ralf. :-)
Godfrey
Shel, I wasn't complaining by any stretch! I don't know what portion
of my message you interpreted as such. I was simply making a logical
connection that I hadn't seen discussed on PDML.
As for the SSM, that was based on the speculation that has been
circulating the list for some time. Aside
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/pentax_09132006_k10d_pr.html?AType=0
Also, the DA70/2.4 Limited ...
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Who knows what they had under all those robes, veils and wigs...
Ah, that just because no one was packin'...
Norm
From: Bob W
snip
I saw a group of Muslim women veiled head-to-toe in black
(on a bright
sunshiny day)
with metal grills across their eyes, sitting around having a
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:11:26AM -0600, Mike Hamilton wrote:
What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed
lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one)
will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens,
given the super-sonic motor
Would a 1700mm/4.0 interest anyone?
http://tinyurl.com/qn5b6
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109c
b80bddfc12571e
100393a1b
He's gonna need one of these:
http://tinyurl.com/e55pm
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Aw, it's only 256kg. Paul will do fine with it, once
he has his K10D with shake reduction!
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a monster. I'd like to see Paul try and hold
that one steady ;-)
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
The official rumored price has it that the camera will be $799.00 with kit
lens in time for Christmas there! You've read it here.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis
It will probably be down to $750 (maybe even $700) by Christmas.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
