Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 19 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/10/05/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-19/ All, I included this note in a series where I may more easily find it again and added the Figure which always helps me stay oriented in this arena.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

List: > On Sep 28, 2021, at 9:30 AM, Jon Awbrey wrote: > > The likeness theory of reference has the same problem as the > correspondence theory of truth, namely, as used in those theories > both terms refer to dyadic relations and dyadic relations are not > adequate to the task of accounting

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 18 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/09/28/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-18/ Re: FB | Medieval Logic https://www.facebook.com/groups/medievallogic ::: Edward Buckner

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/09/12/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-17/ Re: Peirce List https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-08/thrd5.html#00090 ::: Robert Marty

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 16 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/09/02/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-16/ Re: FB | Semeiotics https://www.facebook.com/Semeiotic/posts/4441505199249593 ::: Marius V. Constantin

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 15 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/09/01/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-15/ Re: Peirce List https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-08/thrd5.html#00090 ::: Robert Marty (quoted)

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 14 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/31/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-14/ Re: Animated Logical Graphs • 81 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/26/animated-logical-graphs-81/ Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations •

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 13 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/30/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-13/ Re: Category Theory https://categorytheory.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233104-theory.3A-logic/topic/sign.20relations ::: Peiyuan Zhu

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 12 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/25/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-12/ Re: Peirce List https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-08/thrd5.html#00090 ::: Robert Marty (quoted)

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

ah, what do mathematicians know of life's exigency? proof is our rock and our soul necessity. we don't just make abstractions, we are abstractions. it's coffee and doughnuts all the way down ... no one disturbs our vain diagrams till human voices wake us, and we drown.  also sprach 0* 23

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 11 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/22/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-11/ Re: Peirce List https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-08/thrd1.html#9 ::: Robert Marty

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Jon, excuse me for "John" ... Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty *https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ * Le dim. 15 août 2021 à 12:18, robert marty a écrit : > Dear John, > > I think that the text

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Dear John, I think that the text "*Modeling in Humanities: the case of Peirce's Semiotics (Part A*)" that I just published answers your question. I maintain that retaining a definition of the sign that does not incorporate the internal determinations of the sign by the object and the interpreter

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 10 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/14/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-10/ Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 8 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/13/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-8/ Re:

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 9 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/14/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-9/ Re: Category Theory https://categorytheory.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233104-theory.3A-logic/topic/sign.20relations ::: Morgan Rogers

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 8 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/13/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-8/ Re: Peirce List https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-08/thrd5.html#00090 ::: Robert Marty

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 7 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/13/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-discussion-7/ Re: Category Theory https://categorytheory.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233104-theory.3A-logic/topic/sign.20relations ::: Morgan Rogers

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Jon, List Thank you for reminding me of the definition of a group that I have taught for 45 years ... I think you work with the permutations of symmetrical groups that do not fit well with the interdependence of categories and which make us go out of the Peircian theory, which is not forbidden

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 3 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/12/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-3/ All, It helps me to compare sign relations with my other favorite class of triadic relations, namely, groups. Applications of mathematical groups came up

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Jon, List I am familiar with this type of confusion, and it is not because it has been in Wikipedia for 15 years that it is validated. It existed in my immediate environment that I finally break. I will first make some remarks and then ask you a question. The remark: you spend without

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 2 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/10/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-2/ Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/09/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-1/ All, Definitions

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations

Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/09/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-1/ All, I opened a topic on Sign Relations in the Logic stream of Category Theory Zulipchat to work on Peirce's theory of triadic sign relations in a