> Can anyone point me at examples of pod6 in use?… Concise would be nice,
One concise example I've found useful is the Pod::Load script,
https://modules.raku.org/dist/Pod::Load:cpan:JMERELO/lib/Pod/Load.pm6
This short script shows pod6 used both as a more full-featured
documentation format (the
> $ raku --version
> This is Rakudo version 2020.07 built on MoarVM version 2020.07
> implementing Raku 6.d.
> Whats is new??
Release notes are at
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/blob/master/docs/announce/2020.07.md
I'm most excited for new the Unicode operators, ≡ and ≢ (though the
permutatio
tion of the docs is so different. I've been trying to
contribute to the docs more in the past few weeks, so maybe I can play a small
part in making that situation better for us all.
Best,
Daniel
> Here is my keeper on a hash
Thanks for sharing :)
I like Bruce's Regex-based approach.
Here's how I'd probably approach the problem:
raku -e 'say [+] @*ARGS.grep(+*)' 0 100 200 300 apples 400oranges 2kilos
18.7876 500 grams14 10stars10 sun100moon 77
August 31, 2020 2:28 PM, "Bruce Gray" wrote:
> my $is_a_number = / ^ \d+ [ '.' \d* ]? $ /;
>
> Is there a convenient way to get a list of all classes built-in to Raku?
Short answer:
raku -e '.say for (|CORE::, |UNIT::, |OUTERS::, |MY::).grep({ .key eq
.value.^name }).grep({ .value.HOW.^name eq "Perl6::Metamodel::ClassHOW"
}).map(*.key).unique'
Somewhat longer answer:
https://stackoverf
Kevin Pye wrote:
> Just because mathematics allows an implied multiplication doesn't mean Raku
> does -- in fact I can't
> think of any programming language which does.
As a (potentially) interesting side note, while Raku doesn't provide implied
multiplication, it _is_
one of the few programmi
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> My suggestion is that some formal decision is made about documentation for
> Raku modules, that some
> documentation good practices are put together and included in the Modules
> page.
I think that this is a great idea (and that your suggestions afterwords are a
go
Hi Paul,
That's an interesting question, and I have a few thoughts below. Before I get
to those, I wanted
to point out an issue with the way you started your email with "Hey Gents": the
Raku community
includes many talented women, and I'd love to see it include more.
On to the technical quest
ebsite might look like, but don't think I can communicate
it without a POC). I
hope to be able to share more details in the coming days.
Best,
Daniel / codesections
> For example, you can't get a count of the number of elements in a junction
Well, if you're willing to stoop to ugly enough hacks, there's _always_ a
way :D
any('a', 'b').raku.substr(3).EVAL.elems # OUTPUT «3»
> My guess would be that the `ACCEPTS` method for a Junction
is special cased to ha
> But .EVAL is evil, right?
Indeed! And
any('a', 'b', 'c').raku.substr(3).EVAL.elems;
arguably deserves _extra_ evil points for using the .EVAL method which, unlike
the
EVAL sub, doesn't even warn about how dangerous it is (even though it probably
should).
> It can be done without the EVAL:
>
>> any('a', 'b', 'c').raku.substr(4, *-1).split(',').elems
>
> 3
Yeah, but only at the cost of some fragility:
> any('a', 'b,b', 'c').raku.substr(4, *-1).split(',').elems
4
I suppose you could do:
> any('a', 'b,b', 'c').elems.raku.substr(4, *-1).split(',')
liable trick would be to use a sub and a counter
> variable:
>
> my atomicint $c = 0;
> sub foo($) { ++⚛$c }('a' | 'b,b' | 'c');
> say $c;
>
> Or, taking about tricks:
>
> ('a' | 'b,b' | 'c')».&(-> $ { ++
> Oh, and WAT is [short for] "Weird/will Ass Thing"?
No, it's not an abbreviation for anything – it's the word "what", but
pronounced in a way that
indicates the speaker is surprised/confused. More specifically, it's a
reference to the WAT talk (a
really good one, even if it is about a different
Hi Paul,
If you _do_ want/need to work with C-style null-terminated strings, you can use
the (core)
NativeCall library. So, given your example:
> my Buf $b .= new([72, 105, 0, 32, 97, 103, 97, 105, 110, 0]);
> say $b.decode;
> I would expect this to print 'Hi'.
>
> Instead it prints 'Hi again'
To expand slightly on what Clifton said, the reason that
> %a = %a.map: { .sqrt };
> # (1 1.4142135623730951 1.7320508075688772 2 2.23606797749979)
does what you mean but
> %a{'column1'} ==> map( { .sqrt } )
> # (2.23606797749979)
does not is that the method .map maps over *each item* in the A
I just submitted a PR based on this useful thread.
https://github.com/Raku/doc/pull/3942
Thanks to you both!
(Also, apparently $:a has the same behavior – after the first time, you
can use $a )
y is pretty convincing, but is sounds like you no
longer agree with that guy> I'd be very interested to know what
convinced you.
Thank you in advance,
Daniel
y is pretty convincing, but is sounds like you no
longer agree with that guy> I'd be very interested to know what
convinced you.
Thank you in advance,
Daniel
> * I'm pretty sure i saw something like :!$test to express Bool :$test = False.
> Did i just dreamed about it ?
You sort of dreamed it. :!test passes test => False as a Pair, which means
$test = False.
But that's syntax for calling the fn, not declaring it. You could do Bool()
:$test=0, but
i
+1 from me too. I'd also add test files to the list, which have at least .t
and .rakutest
(with the latter being preferred AFAK, so that GitHub will start highlighting
them correctly).
I'm not sure if there are other acceptable extensions for test files, though?
> The question now is that I can't find anything about COERCE in the
> documentation.
Yeah, COERCE definitely should be documented but just hasn't been yet.
There's a raku/doc issue about needing to add it
(https://github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3807)
but unfortunately none of us has done so yet :
February 12, 2022 4:12 PM, "Parrot Raiser" <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In this article, "Every Simple Language Will Eventually End Up Turing
> Complete"
> https://solutionspace.blog/2021/12/04/every-simple-language-will-eventually-end-up-turing-complete
> the author points out an unfortunate ten
be a good
option if you're trying to keep something concise.)
Using that syntax, your example goes from
S:g[(x)|(y)] = $0 ?? x-replacement !! y-replacement
to
S:g[$=[x]|y] = $ ?? x-replacement !! y-replacement
which is pretty similar.
I hope that helps!
Best,
Daniel
--
Am 30.09.2017 19:34 schrieb "Mark Devine" :
My most common OC case: initialize attributes at OC time from external
input that will be parsed with grammars &/| scrubbed with elaborate
conditional tests.
Just a shot in the dark without fully understanding the above: maybe your
difficulties indicat
Wrt your second problem, if this
> $arg_for = [ ( 0 .. $arg_for ) »*« $arg_for ];
is not rw so is not actually adding the entry to the hash (btw,
shouldn't the >>*<< be >>* as the right-hand operand is a scalar?), then
it is possible that
> > > And then I get an error telling me 'No such method in
> what problems Perl 5 has that Perl 6 fixes
A type system to die for.
I think that is enough of a win on its own that mentioning any of the
other features will only muddy the issue :->
--
"The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who
are laughed at are geniuses. The
> (would that be a "pliki"? a "sixwiki"? a "plixi"? erm-)
psiki, where the "p" is silent. Like what you throw when you fancy a
free day off work.
--
Humpty Dumpty sat on the wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall,
All the King's horses and all the King's men | http://surreal.istic.org/
> Ask Bj�rn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Woah, we are getting really far away from talking about perl6
> > here...
>
> Kind of a usenet law or corollary? "Every discussion about wikis ends
You're being a bit optimistic there, aren't you? The only way you'd end
a my-wiki-is-better-than-y
> Also realize that it is not necessarily the duty of Textile (et al) to
> handle that aspect beyond text formatting. A diff or history-revision
> view goes beyond the context of the tool.
I don't think Juerd was talking about tables for the purposes of showing
version diffs, but so you can give p
> Multimethods are not just overloading as in C++.
To expand upon this point a little, you can use multimethods to do
pattern-matching in the style of ML and similar languages. So, to pinch
an example from the pugs tree (examples/functional/fp.p6)
multi sub length () returns Int { 0
> What am I doing wrong?
Sounds like you need to define (or at least declare) the new operator
before you use it. Perl 6, like Perl 5 compiles with a single pass, so
when you are using your random operator, it hasn't yet read the
declaration further down the file.
It does its best to DTRT with mos
Qui, 2008-02-21 às 11:15 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu:
> I was already told at the beginning of Perl 6 that nobody wanted my
> implementation skills. :)
I really wouldn't mind your implementation skills being used in SMOP ;).
daniel
the request
# params.
action bar($patharg, :$param1, :$param2) does Path {
# Catalyst already expects a context variable, $c, which
# contains the info for the current processing
$+c.stash. = 'bar';
}
}
daniel
oking for is $/.from.
Unfortunally, rakudo doesn't seem to support match-in-while semantics,
but follows a preview of something that does work...
my $word = 'banana';
my @guess = ;
$word ~~ /a/;
@guess[$/.from] = 'a';
say @guess;
daniel
Em Sex, 2009-01-02 às 08:34 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> token routine_def: {...}
Actually, I was just looking at STD, and the correct token would be
token routine_declarator:coro { }
I was also looking at the spec files, and I realized that DRAFT S17
mentions coroutines, but
d idea to avoid
action-at-a-distance.
But maybe we even convince larry to push that into STD... since it's
such a nice feature...
daniel
ot in the rakudo
logo?
...
sorry, couldn't resist... again...
daniel
Em Ter, 2009-03-24 às 09:01 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> A zombie cat?
While I wasn't really serious about it...
<>
ser features that
> Perl
> 6 provides which is relatively new to languages in general.
A zombie cat?
sorry... couldn't resist...
daniel
regex-dna benchmarks. You
use regexes to analyze DNA code. Currently Rakudo is very slow at it,
but that's not surprising at this stage.
http://daniel.carrera.bz/_2009/perl/shootout-perl6-2009.05.27.tgz
Cheers,
Daniel.
Daniel Carrera wrote:
http://daniel.carrera.bz/_2009/perl/shootout-perl6-2009.05.27.tgz
To run the benchmark:
perl6 regex-dna.p6.pl < regex-dna.input
On my computer it takes about 99s to run on Rakudo, compared to 0.18s
for Perl 5 (the Perl 5 benchmark is included in the .tgz f
an language shootout to Perl 6. I figure this is a good place to
start because each benchmark is designed to test one specific aspect of
the language. I've only done a couple of benchmarks. If you are
interested, why don't you help me? Porting benchmarks is a good way to
learn Perl 6.
Cheers,
Daniel.
the benchmarks are well
designed, your page will be not only nice but also useful.
Daniel.
king on the reverse-complement benchmark.
Cheers,
Daniel.
ctors.
I am interested in a tool that can benchmark both perl 5 and perl 6
natively.
If you write such a tool, I'd like to try it.
Daniel.
things to even
out.
I look forward to seeing your code.
Daniel.
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Aruna (>):
I tested the below code on parrot-1.1.0 and it read all the lines in the
file and tested same code on the latest git update (4th June 2009), it
outputs only the first line.
That's what C<$file.get> does -- it gives you one line per default.
You want C<$file.lines>.
ank line!!
Daniel.
seful.
http://daniel.carrera.bz/2009/06/rpn-calculator-in-perl-6/
Cheers,
Daniel.
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
TIMTOWTDI ;)
The objective of the blog was more about the learning + teaching
experience than anything else.
http://sial.org/pbot/37075
% perl rpn.pl "2 2 +"
Semicolon seems to be missing at rpn.pl line 2.
String found where operator expected at rpn.
Daniel Carrera wrote:
http://sial.org/pbot/37075
% perl rpn.pl "2 2 +"
Tee hee... that should have been "perl6". :-)
Ok, try again:
% perl6 rpn.pl "2 2+"
2 2
Daniel Carrera wrote
Ok, try again:
% perl6 rpn.pl "2 2+"
2 2
You can probably fix that with a different split() line. I tried using
instead of \s+ but the program just hangs forever.
I also tried a more complex expression, and the calculator didn't like it:
% perl6 rpn.pl
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
You can probably fix that with a different split() line. I tried using
instead of \s+ but the program just hangs forever.
Hmm.. it certainly is in the split, I'm not sure how to get the barrier
between the 2 and the +
Does Perl 6 still have the word barrier \b
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes... that's what wasn't implemented... But now it is ;)
http://sial.org/pbot/37085
Close, but...
% perl6 rpn.pl "5 4 + 3 / 5 3 - *"
-6
That should be a positive 6.
Are you planning to write a post explaining how your program works? I
figure tha
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Are you planning to write a post explaining how your program works?
Maybe, but if you want to beat me to it, feel free ;)
I figure that the explanation is as useful as the example. I sure
spent a lot of time writing the blog post.
I'm not sure I'll have t
http://sial.org/pbot/37077
A slightly improved syntax, as per jnthn++ suggestion...
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 18:08 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Carrera wrote
> > Ok, try again:
> > % perl6 rpn.pl "2 2+"
> > 2 2
> You can probably fix that with a dif
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 19:45 -0400, Minimiscience escreveu:
> my $ls = @a.shift;
> my $rs = @a.shift;
> To:
> my $rs = @a.pop;
> my $ls = @a.pop;
Thanks... this was already solved in the latest version I sent
http://sial.org/pbot/37089
daniel
Em Dom, 2009-06-07 às 00:07 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> >> Are you planning to write a post explaining how your program works?
> > Maybe, but if you want to beat me to it, feel free ;)
> >> I figure that the explanation is as useful as the e
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 14:06 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> I just wrote a blog post showing how to make a reverse polish notation
> calculator in Perl 6. In the process I show some of Perl 6's grammar
> features.
TIMTOWTDI ;)
http://sial.org/pbot/37075
daniel
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 18:22 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > er... that's because I didn't tried to implement it... but it
> certainly
> > is possible to, just by declaring the :(@a, Num $a) variant...
> Well, * is implemented, so I gues
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 19:51 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > Yes... that's what wasn't implemented... But now it is ;)
> > http://sial.org/pbot/37085
> Close, but...
> % perl6 rpn.pl "5 4 + 3 / 5 3 - *"
> -6
> That should be
one can no longer say that Perl's OOP is awkward.
I put a lot of effort in writing the code the same way in all languages
and I tried very hard to avoid any bias.
Cheers,
Daniel.
very informative. It just says "Confused at line 28, near my @sorted".
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large
number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
t;
Thanks. The blacklash "unspace" works.
my @sorted = @names.sort({ %sets{$_} })\
.sort({ %matches{$_} })\
.reverse;
Though I'm a bit sad that you need that and you can't just separate methods
with spaces.
Daniel.
--
No trees were des
postcircumfix:sym<{ }>, couldn't find final
'}'
%matches{ $r1 > $r2 ? $p1 : $p2 }++;
# Idea 2 gives: Unable to parse blockoid, couldn't find final '}'
$r1 > $r2 ? { %matches{$p1}++ } : { %matches{$p2}++ };
Is there a way to make something along these lines wor
ative:
$r1 > $r2 ?? { %matches{$p1}++ } !! { %matches{$p2}++ };
Now the problem is that %matches is empty. I'm not sure why. Maybe you can't
have code blocks inside ?? ... !! ...
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large number
of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
not a big fan of special cases. As you said, they make the language
harder to learn. I would add that it makes it harder to predict what a piece
of code is going to do. One thing I want from a programing language is to
predict what it's going to do.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
No trees were destro
s, I confirmed that the following
works:
$r1 > $r2 ?? {%matches{$p1}++}() !! {%matches{$p2}++}();
So, in this needlessly complex code, I basically create an anonymous
function and immediately execute it.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large number
of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> or
>
> my $closure = $r1 > $r2 ?? { %matches{$p1}++ } !! { %matches{$p2}++ };
> # invoke it
> $closure();
>
That's very cool. Perl 6 is a functional language with lambdas and
everything.
Daniel.
--
No t
mind that TTIAR is always a syntax error
> in Perl6, then if your code is compiling, whatever is between ?? and !! must
> be a single term.
>
> It's really the TTIAR thing that makes reading Perl6 so incredibly
> predictable, I think.
>
What is TTIAR?
Daniel.
--
No tree
T
> Multi()
>
> &say.WHAT
> Multi()
>
> &sin.WHAT
> Multi().
Interesting. I imagine that Multi() means that the function has multiple
definitions. For example, I expect that "sin" has one implementation for
floats and another for complex numbers.
> But ser
two terms one after the
other with nothing in between.
Yes, Multi() means it is a multimethod. Multimethods [are routines
> that can have multiple variants that share the same name, selected by
> arity, types, or some other constraints.][3]
>
Thanks.
Daniel.
--
No trees were
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM, yary wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Carrera
> wrote:
> >
> > So TTIR just means that any two terms must be separated by something,
> like
> > an operator (2+5). Which basically is common sense and I'm actually
&g
", "length" and "size" without success.
3) More generally, is there a way to find out what methods are
available? I'm thinking of something like "@foo.METHODS" and it'd give
me a list of all the methods available in arrays. That would be
useful.
Cheers,
D
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>> 1) Does anyone know what a "Parcel" is?
>>
>> <1 2 3 4>.WHAT => Parcel()
>> <1 2 3 4 ; 2 3 4 ; 5>.WHAT => Pa
esearch (e.g.
Masters thesis, PhD thesis, or university research), does that count
as "production environment" or just "real problems"?
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large
number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
ting for a specific feature to be implemented in Rakudo.
* Rakudo is too slow.
* I didn't realize Rakudo was ready for use.
* Other [ fill in the blank ]
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large
number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
Out of curiosity, is it possible to get Rakukdo to talk to C, C++ or Fortran?
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> On behalf of the Rakudo and Perl 6 development teams, I'm happy to
> announce the December 2010 release of "Rakudo Star", a useful and usable
> distribution
;.
But as you can imagine, I need to spend most of my time doing my
research. I can't afford a big battle to get Rakudo and Fortran 95
talking to each other.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large
number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 23:02, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>> We will have questions about usage of Perl 5 and we think there should
>> be also questions
>> about Perl 6.
>
> Should Perl 6 be called something else?
> * No
> * Yes, not sure what
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Chas. Owens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:39, Xue, Brian wrote:
>> I want to adding one more answer about what are people waiting for before
>> they
>> start using Perl 6.
>>
>> There hasn't an official release of PERL6.0, just Rakudo. I'm afraid of
>> Raku
r. In turn, if Perl 6.0 is ready and Rakudo hasn't released a
1.0 I might figure that they still need more time.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email, but a large
number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
xpecting that when Rakudo is ready it would have a
1.0 release. I sure did. Using year + month is nice in a way, but it
means that you don't immediately know if the release is production vs
devel, or whether it's a major vs minor release.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the
nux?
I suspect 1.0
> - At what point was each of the above declared a "production release";
> was it concurrent with the release, or some time afterwards?
IMO, concurrent.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email. However, a
large number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
e, yes. I
don't think it's a rule, but I expect to see a feature freeze, and a
period where you just look for bugs for the existing feature set, and
then comes the production release.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email. However, a
large number of elec
n official blessing is needed by most of us. This can
> be Larry for Perl or Patrick for Rakudo or having it
> "supplied by our vendor" (e.g. Ubuntu, Red Hat or ActiveState).
Yeah, something like that.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email. However, a
large number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
development list and track its progress in order to decide
for myself if it is ready for use. I certainly don't have the time or
energy or inclination to do that for every single software product I
use.
I will make exceptions for software that has a very long history. I
have no doubt that Emacs
That's rather annoying. Isn't there a way to fix that?
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 03:19 AM, gvim wrote:
>> Does this mean I have no option but to install git in order to keep my Perl
>> 6 up to date?
>
> No. You can download and install a release tarball o
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 09:30, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>>
>> That's rather annoying. Isn't there a way to fix that?
>
> Yes, install Rakudo Star instead, that bundles a suitable version of Parrot.
Oh, gvim w
about strange attractors and orbits, but I
haven't the faintest clue how big the "orbit" of either Perl 6 or
Rakudo is. Therefore, I cannot recommend it to other people, and I
will hesitate to use it on anything that is very important.
Daniel.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Ric
one who wants to see increased adoption of Perl 6 /
Rakudo.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email. However, a
large number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
use. For any given software package, 99.99% of
users do not follow the developers list of look through the test
suite.
Daniel.
--
No trees were destroyed in the generation of this email. However, a
large number of electrons were severely inconvenienced.
of
> the compiler, they will look at the size of the test suites.
If they are critics to begin with, the size of the test suite will not
impress them. They could just as well conclude that Perl 6 must have a
million corner cases and gotchas that have to be tested. I have never
seen a language re
ideas. As it is, I'll probably use PDL or NumPy for that
purpose.
Daniel.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke)
wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 02:51 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>
>> Let me just give a probably totally irrelevant comment here.
>> I think most of the
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-01 at 14:53 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>> I would be very interested to see something that allowed Rakudo to
>> talk to Fortran 95.
>>
>> I am going to use Fortran 95 for my thesis work, and maybe I
Is it possible to explain briefly wht the Rulle-Takens algorithm is?
That web page seems to mainly explain how some fractals like the
Mandelbrot set and the Julia set are generated. Is there a specific,
simple algorithm that we can try to implement in PDL, Perl 5 and Perl
6?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 a
n no
offence by this, is that people try to divert the question because they
do not like the answer. If Perl 6 + implementations had a support
comparable to C99 or Fortran 2003, I strongly suspect that most people
would have answered with "yes, it is production ready".
Daniel.
On 11
ons.
Javascript has the advantage of being in the browser. The only thing I
like about Javascript is that it is a functional language, but it is not
a terribly well designed one.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
I'm not overweight, I'm undertall.
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
