Re: [HACKERS] StringInfo misc. issues

2007-08-30 Thread NikhilS
Apologies! As Alvaro guessed it correctly I was working with 8.2 sources. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Nikhils On 8/29/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NikhilS [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch should fix this. And break other things, no doubt. needed = 0 is a perfectly

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Gregory Stark
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no question things would be clearer with only one text search data type. The only value I can see to having a tsquery data type is that you can store a tsquery value in a column, but why would that be much better than just storing it in a TEXT

Re: [HACKERS] msvc++ build of 8.2.4 and encodings

2007-08-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:49:03PM -0600, Charlie Savage wrote: Hmm. Its postgresql 8.2.4 + tsearch2 + tree + postgis. postgis in turn loads proj4 and geos. I grepped through those 3 libraries source code and did not find any calls to setlocale. So I don't think so. So now I'm

Re: [HACKERS] Some more msvc++ 8.2.4 build feedback

2007-08-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:53:55PM -0600, Charlie Savage wrote: In addition to the encoding issues I have with the 8.2.4 MSVC++ build (see previous email), there are some other issues that I've run into: 1. The custom build step that generates DEF files for DLLS using a perl script does

Re: [HACKERS] initdb failed on Windows 2000

2007-08-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:57:55AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote: I have compiled PostgreSQL 8.2.4 with MinGW on Windows 2000. Then I have executed initdb as Administrator. However initdb failed with the following message. The program postgres is needed by

Re: [HACKERS] correct behavior of ANALYZE ...

2007-08-30 Thread Hans-Juergen Schoenig
hi tom ... the idea behind this is to disable the stats on a certain column entirely. this would give me more control about the plan. in this special case data is changing so frequently that the default values are ways better than trying to keep the real stats up to date. in case of

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Andrew Dunstan a écrit : Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think it might make sense to put Contrib Modules as a section under either Reference or Appendices. Also, I don't think it's necessary to make each command option

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:18 schrieb Neil Conway: I wonder if it would be possible to keep the master version of the contrib docs as SGML, and generate plaintext READMEs from it during the documentation build. Using asciidoc you could do it the other way around. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:27 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib, namely that we break it out into standard modules But that would also mean that the documentation system is somewhat modularized. That is, if I deinstall some module,

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Tom Lane wrote: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And I'm quite tempted to not flush the XLOG at all during ABORT, and to only force synchronous commits if one of the to-be-deleted files is non-temporary. +1 on the first, but -1 on the second, because we'd have to track whether

[HACKERS] testing more than one configuration on a single build machine

2007-08-30 Thread Gabor Szabo
Hi, I have recently signed up to run smoke testing of PostgreSQL. As I understand each animal has a set of configuration that is represented as icons on the status page. I wonder how would be it possible to run several configurations on the same machine? I mean with or without debug, with or

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread ohp
Hi all, On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:34:46 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan

Re: [HACKERS] testing more than one configuration on a single build machine

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Gabor Szabo wrote: Hi, I have recently signed up to run smoke testing of PostgreSQL. As I understand each animal has a set of configuration that is represented as icons on the status page. I wonder how would be it possible to run several configurations on the same machine? I mean with or

Re: [HACKERS] testing more than one configuration on a single build machine

2007-08-30 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Gabor Szabo wrote: Hi, I have recently signed up to run smoke testing of PostgreSQL. As I understand each animal has a set of configuration that is represented as icons on the status page. I wonder how would be it possible to run several configurations on the same machine? I mean with or

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 20:27 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib, namely that we break it out into standard modules But that would also mean that the documentation system is somewhat modularized.

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does someone have a box with lots of grunt that can spare some cycles for a few hours once a week or so? I've just configure centaur (CentOS 5) like this. Do you need it for every version (8.1, 8.2) or just HEAD Do you need it just once a week or every run? I

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it, but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for contrib. I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of the contrib docs, ie, put the

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 15:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: What? No it doesn't. You have missed the key word in the sentence above: standard. The idea is that the docs will describe the *standard* modules, i.e. those that ship with the PostgreSQL core distribution (because they are currently

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Gregory Stark
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems doable, but it's not pretty. One possible scheme would be to emit a record *after* chosing a name but *before* creating the file, No, because the way you know the name is good is a successful open(O_CREAT). The idea was to log *twice*.

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 15:26 schrieb Tom Lane: I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have *not* installed or even heard of the modules.  So it's not in the docs unless you installed it

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just configure centaur (CentOS 5) like this. Do you need it for every version (8.1, 8.2) or just HEAD Do you need it just once a week or every run? I can also configure wharthog (unixware) like this if you need... I have

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 15:26 schrieb Tom Lane: I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have *not* installed or even heard of the modules. So it's not in the docs

Re: [HACKERS] testing more than one configuration on a single build machine

2007-08-30 Thread Gabor Szabo
On 8/30/07, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't really the place to ask about running buildfarm - it has its own mailing list to which you should have been subscribed. I am sorry. Do you mean this? http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members I could not find

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no question things would be clearer with only one text search data type. The only value I can see to having a tsquery data type is that you can store a tsquery value in a column, but why would that be much better

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: +1 on the first, but -1 on the second, because we'd have to track whether deleted files are temp or not ... it's very unclear that it'd be worth the trouble. I'm confused. smgrcreate already tracks if it created a file for a temp

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Gregory Stark
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no question things would be clearer with only one text search data type. The only value I can see to having a tsquery data type is that you can store a tsquery value in a

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, do you need it on unixware? do you need it more than once a week? No, and no. FYI, centaurc is running make check for 3 hours now and has'nt finished! You're finding out why I suggested a really low duty cycle ;-) regards, tom lane

[HACKERS] tsearch2, gin and @@@ operator?

2007-08-30 Thread Jean-Paul Argudo
Hi all, I cant find in the docs about tsearch2 (nor the OlegTeodor's wiki) when to use @@@ instead of @@. @@ works in GIST, even with 'lexeme:a' (:a, :bc, etc.. every combination of a,b,c d part) @@ doesnt with GIN in the same queries it, PostgreSQL says: ERREUR: With class of lexeme

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread ohp
Hi Tom On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:04:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no question things would be clearer with only one text search data type. The only value I can see to having a tsquery data type is that you can

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How would that happen if there wasn't a tsquery type? I don't think Bruce is suggesting that the search operand can really be plain text (or if he is, he's nuts). The question here is whether there's really a need for a distinction between tsvector and

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How would that happen if there wasn't a tsquery type? I don't think Bruce is suggesting that the search operand can really be plain text (or if he is, he's nuts). The question here is whether Yes, that is what I was suggesting

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, do you need it on unixware? do you need it more than once a week? FYI, centaurc is running make check for 3 hours now and has'nt finished! The platform probably doesn't matter so much, I suspect. Once a week on a separately registered animal should be fine.

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] reindexdb hangs

2007-08-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Yeah, an extra fetch of the pg_class row doesn't seem all that nice. I think you'd want to check it in approximately the same two places where pg_class_ownercheck() is applied (one for the 1-xact and one for the

Re: [HACKERS] Some more msvc++ 8.2.4 build feedback

2007-08-30 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi Magnus, Yeah, this is a known problem, and it's fixed for 8.3. Really, the msvc build process in 8.2 has a *lot* of rough edges ;-) The code itself builds fine, but the buildsystem needed a lot more work. Great - figured that might be the case. 3. If you have a contrib module that is

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote: Gregory Stark wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is no question things would be clearer with only one text search data type. The only value I can see to having a tsquery data type is that you can store a tsquery value in a column,

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2, gin and @@@ operator?

2007-08-30 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote: Hi all, I cant find in the docs about tsearch2 (nor the OlegTeodor's wiki) when to use @@@ instead of @@. it's written here http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/fts/doc/indexes-fts.html @@ works in GIST, even with 'lexeme:a' (:a, :bc, etc..

[HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread Merlin Moncure
I noticed that enums are not available to be queried as binary through the protocol. Is this a known issue? Too late to fix for 8.3? This is kind of a pain, because it forces any query that returns an enum to return the entire result as text. afaik, enums are the only POD type to behave this

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Ron Mayer
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why does text search need a tsquery data type? I realize it needs tsvector so it can create indexes and updated trigger columns, but it seems tsquery could instead just be a simple text string. By that logic, we don't need any data

[HACKERS] Re: Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Gregory Stark wrote: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems doable, but it's not pretty. One possible scheme would be to emit a record *after* chosing a name but *before* creating the file, No, because the way you know the name is good is a successful open(O_CREAT). The idea was

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Tom Lane wrote: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: +1 on the first, but -1 on the second, because we'd have to track whether deleted files are temp or not ... it's very unclear that it'd be worth the trouble. I'm confused. smgrcreate already tracks if it created a

Re: [HACKERS] Why is there a tsquery data type?

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Ron Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could similar logic argue that we'd want special types for regular expressions too? That seems quite parallel to the tsquery type to me. Yeah, it certainly seems like something we might want to consider in future --- we could get rid of that klugy cache for

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So should we not force synchronous commit if all to-be-deleted files are temporary? Or is that pushing our luck too much, because it opens the window of possible file leakage considerably wider? I think this area is something to be left for later.

Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Merlin Moncure wrote: I noticed that enums are not available to be queried as binary through the protocol. Is this a known issue? Too late to fix for 8.3? This is kind of a pain, because it forces any query that returns an enum to return the entire result as text. afaik, enums are the only

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] reindexdb hangs

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure I follow. Are you suggesting adding a new function, similar to pg_class_ownercheck, which additionally checks for temp-ness? No, I was just suggesting adding the check for temp-ness in cluster() and cluster_rel() where we do

Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noticed that enums are not available to be queried as binary through the protocol. What do you think the binary representation ought to be? Copying OIDs seems pretty useless. regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Merlin Moncure wrote: I noticed that enums are not available to be queried as binary through the protocol. The trouble is that an enum doesn't have an immutable internal binary value. I guess we could say that the binary value is the integer offset

Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread korry.douglas
What if we just defined the binary format as being identical to the text format, ie, the enum label? A bit silly but at least it would eliminate the gotcha that binary I/O fails. Seems like it would make a lot more sense to the client application that way too... -- Korry

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 00:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And I'm quite tempted to not flush the XLOG at all during ABORT, and to only force synchronous commits if one of the to-be-deleted files is non-temporary. +1 on the first, but -1 on the second,

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So should we not force synchronous commit if all to-be-deleted files are temporary? Or is that pushing our luck too much, because it opens the window of possible file leakage considerably wider?

[HACKERS] synchronous_commit: Developer's View

2007-08-30 Thread Simon Riggs
Async Commit is a useful feature, yet it requires some additional application code to be added to appropriate transactions. That code is then clearly version dependent, which may not always be desirable. It would be good if there was a way to make that a DBA-controllable setting, much the same as

Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: What if we just defined the binary format as being identical to the text format, ie, the enum label? A bit silly but at least it would eliminate the gotcha that binary I/O fails. So we should pretty much mimic text_send/text_recv? If so I can probably get that

[HACKERS] Password requirement in windows installer

2007-08-30 Thread Decibel!
Why does the windows installer require a password for the superuser account, since it's perfectly legitimate not to have a password on that account? I could see perhaps producing a warning, but making this a hard requirement seems like overkill. -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit: Developer's View

2007-08-30 Thread Gregory Stark
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps it would be possible to do this ALTER FUNCTION fubar SET synchronous_commit = off; So that any invocation of the function would automatically set all of the appropriate parameters prior to execution. The problem here is that functions

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit: Developer's View

2007-08-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Simon Riggs wrote: Async Commit is a useful feature, yet it requires some additional application code to be added to appropriate transactions. That code is then clearly version dependent, which may not always be desirable. It would be good if there was a way to make that a DBA-controllable

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit: Developer's View

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... So at least for the pl/pgsql case, it seems easy enough to temporarily change GUCs already. For other PLs, things might be different though - I wouldn't know, I have never really used them... It's definitely possible, but it's inconvenient and

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -1 to second: If there are any temporary deleted files then it is because we've done a large sort, hash join etc, so avoiding the sync makes no difference to the overall response time. I think you're confused, actually: this is not about temporary sort

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -1 to second: If there are any temporary deleted files then it is because we've done a large sort, hash join etc, so avoiding the sync makes no difference to the overall response time. I think you're confused, actually: this is not

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why don't we create temp tables in a separate directory, anyway? That would make it trivially easy to get rid of them during recovery: just zap all the files in there. Hmm ... doesn't do anything to fix the problem of file leakage for crashes when

Re: [HACKERS] Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment

2007-08-30 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Tom Lane wrote: Whether that's common enough to be worth special optimization, I'm not sure. Your point that the transaction may have been heavyweight enough that it'd hardly matter is still on-target, you just got there by the wrong reasoning ;-) My point is that there is hardly any effort

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Some committers are using DocBook installations that seem quite lax about closing tags :-(, so they fail to see this type of breakage. Yep. What should I upgrade, and to what version?

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Some committers are using DocBook installations that seem quite lax about closing tags :-(, so they fail to see this type of breakage. Yep. What should I upgrade, and to what

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: I figured out how to make my toolchain warn about missing tags like newer tool chains. My openjade needs the -wfully-tagged warning. I added it to sgml/Makefile. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tatsuo Ishii wrote Can someone please fix this? openjade -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -wfully-tagged -D . -c /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets/catalog -d stylesheet.dsl -i output-html -t sgml postgres.sgml openjade:bookindex.sgml:2731:0:E: character data is not allowed here

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: I figured out how to make my toolchain warn about missing tags like newer tool chains. My openjade needs the -wfully-tagged warning. I added it to sgml/Makefile. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] broken doc

2007-08-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tatsuo Ishii wrote Can someone please fix this? It's working for me On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says. I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of