-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 00:53
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage
Andreas Pflug wrote:
pgAdmin is designed for a good interactive experience, which isn't
achievable
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 12:48
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage
especially != only
Very true :-)
BTW, pgadmin could improve its Linux coverage somewhat by a)
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 22:27
To: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Guys,
Oh, and how about we kill the Image Map of
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 November 2003 23:11
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Josh Berkus writes:
If possible, for the upcoming release we'd like
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 14:47
To: Robert Treat
Cc: Dave Page; Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
On Thu, Nov 06
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 22:18
To: Robert Treat
Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Dave Page; Josh Berkus;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Let me ask you
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 November 2003 17:37
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Josh Berkus;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List
I really think they
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 November 2003 19:35
To: PostgreSQL Development
Subject: [HACKERS] Timestamps on schema objects
People occasionally seem to ask for keeping time stamps on
schema objects (tables, functions, etc.)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 November 2003 23:31
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Josh Berkus writes:
Given all that, don't people think it's
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2003 09:23
To: Dave Page
Cc: Josh Berkus; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Dave Page writes:
Least interesting to many
Hi all,
I get the following build error when attempting to build 7.4 in a Linux
Vserver (like a FreeBSD jail) built on Slackware 9.1 with the 2.4.22
kernel:
make -C doc all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.4/doc'
gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf -
for file in man1/*.1;
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2003 15:31
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
From: Nagib Abi Fadel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 December 2003
14:37To: generalpost; developPostSubject: [HACKERS]
Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when dealing with string
columns ?
HI,
let's say we have the following table:
#CREATE TABLE
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2003 01:17
To: Ray Aspeitia
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 include file conflict
Where are we going on the pgsql/include file conflicts?
sqltypes.h is very common on
It's rumoured that David Fetter once said:
I guess that's OK, but it shows up like a beacon to all kinds of
hostile gear. Passive systems are usually a better bet.
Are there many hostile forces in your hallway?
:-)
/D
---(end of
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 December 2003 02:41
To: PostgreSQL-development
Cc: Tom Lane; Peter Eisentraut; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Quoting of psql \d output
We have been discussing this patch on the
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 January 2004 20:21
To: William ZHANG
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OLE DB driver
AFAIK, rely on libpq is a fast way but not always convenient.
Seems like more convinent than
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 00:21
To: Lamar Owen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Old binary packages.
Lamar Owen wrote:
I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary
tree on the
ftp site,
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only
things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 February 2004 08:15
To: Dave Page
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well I've
only been
using PostgreSQL since 1997
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 February 2004 17:35
To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2004 13:18
To: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development
Subject: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends
Would adding OID to the rows returned by each Select
call, and then doing
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2004 14:10
To: Dave Page
Cc: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends
I would, except I'm not sure how many queries I would
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2004 14:56
To: Dave Page
Cc: Hackers; PostgreSQL OLE DB development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends
I'll have a look at that. How would updateable cursors do
It's rumoured that Andrew Dunstan once said:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Another problem is that pg_description is per-database, while
pg_user/group are global for all databases.
databases are also per cluster, but we have comments on those.
Could we keep the user/group comments in those tables
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2004 23:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pgsql-www] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
B) Favor www.pgfoundry.org
I don't really mind too much either way, but if
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
So I'd suggest:
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Gardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 March 2004 01:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Doxygen?
I'll start posting the documentation I am generating to my
vanity site (announcements later), but would this be
something that the
It's rumoured that Euler Taveira de Oliveira once said:
Hi Christopher,
The \l command should only list databases that the current user is
authorized for, the \du command should only list users authorized
for the current database (and perhaps only superusers should get
even that much
It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Dave Page wrote:
k, but what I'm suggesting shouldn't prevent that, should it? They
should only be able to see those resources that they have permissions
to see, not all of them ... no?
Wouldn't that require per-row
It's rumoured that Bruce Momjian once said:
Is it better in /contrib or gborg?
Gborg imho. I thought we were trying to move all non-core code there now.
Isn't that why psqlodbc etc. were moved?
Regards, Dave
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3:
-Original Message-
From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2004 19:16
To: Jan Wieck
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for
replication solutions
Hello,
My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2004 08:43
To: Shachar Shemesh
Cc: Tom Lane; Robert Treat; Dennis Bjorklund; Bruce Momjian;
PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL advocacy
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Do we prefer software that works or
-Original Message-
From: Matthew T. O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 May 2004 21:40
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2
Anyway, not having looked at this at all, how
[Third attempt to send this - dunno where they're all going!]
I forgot to CC the start of this to -hackers last time - please see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-05/msg00034.php
for background.
Following Magnus' suggestions yesterday I made the following changes:
- The
-Original Message-
From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 May 2004 10:20
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Relocatable installs
I don't think that's a problem at all:
1. Believe it or not, you
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2004 15:49
To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch
Hi!
A few quick comments:
1a) Please don't use such a long name for event source
It's rumoured that Marc Slemko once said:
For Windows, replace config file with Registry. That is usually
hardcoded for (depending on whether you want it changeable per-user)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\company name\product name (replace
HKLM with HKEY_LOCAL_USER if you want per-user
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 11:40
To: Simon Riggs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices
It definitly is there fro Windows Server 2003, in the new
port. But since you are talking
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 13:01
To: Dave Page; Simon Riggs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Small OS ports Handheld devices
Not having looked at the code, I think you are going to have
a much easier time
-Original Message-
From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2004 16:02
To: Bruno Wolff III
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type
About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near
future, rejecting private subnet
-Original Message-
From: Steve Atkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2004 16:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
syntactically valid, but should be immediately rejected.
I
-Original Message-
From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2004 17:02
To: Dave Page
Cc: Bruno Wolff III; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type
Well I think that accept an email like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is a risky.
It's true
It's rumoured that Steve Atkins once said:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:01:05PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is syntactically valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
syntactically valid, but should be immediately rejected.
I disagree - just because the database server cannot verify
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2004 19:34
To: Jeffrey W. Baker
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc Fournier
Subject: [HACKERS] search engine down (again)
Jeffrey W. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you are referring to
-Original Message-
From: CoL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2002 13:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Web site
Hi,
So, why not just redirect people to one of the mirrors listed? This
could be done based on IP (yes it is inaccurate but it is
Hi,
Now that the ODBC driver has moved from the main distro to
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc/, we can no longer use the
main build system under *nix.
Can someone who knows make better than I (which is probably the vast
majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 September 2002 21:11
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
Dave Page writes:
Can someone who knows make
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
Dave Page writes:
majority of you!) knock up
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
Dave Page writes:
majority of you!) knock up
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am concerned that removing them may cause
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
To: PostgreSQL-development
Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and
version
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
To: PostgreSQL-development
Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and
version
-Original Message-
From: Tommy [mailto:tmartin1;telocity.com]
Sent: 28 October 2002 03:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Pgsql and .NET (Help!)
I have been trying for 3 days to connect to my postgres linux
box via vb .net on a windows box. I have to make this work
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
To: Dave Page
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Dave,
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl;sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53
To: Jason Tishler
Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas
Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Make installcheck also
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
To: Dave Page
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48
To: Dave Page
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
I found a solution
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason;tishler.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
To: Dave Page
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Hackers: As the Cygwin
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Attached is a diff to fix the pclose problem
-Original Message-
From: Greg Copeland [mailto:greg;copelandconsulting.net]
Sent: 30 October 2002 01:08
To: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
C++? Really? What GUI toolkit is being used?
Just curious.
wxWindows. The CVS is online if anyone
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18
To: Sean Chittenden
Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
Ports list updated:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Conway [mailto:mail;joeconway.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 16:16
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Jan Wieck; Hannu Krosing; PostgreSQL-development; Tatsuo Ishii
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
Bruce, I can compile on VC++ (VS .Net) for you. Let me know
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 08 November 2002 04:54
To: Steve Howe
Cc: Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
OK, Steve's vote is enough to indicate that most want to wait
for PeerDirect's version
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman;candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: 08 November 2002 16:10
To: Dave Page
Cc: Steve Howe; Katie Ward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port
I hope I didn't sound too unappreciative of the great
contribution PeerDirect
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2002 06:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Time to move on...
Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL
steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and
-Original Message-
From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 November 2002 21:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
I had read on one of the newsgroups that there is a planned
native port to the win32 platform, is this true?
-Original Message-
From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 14:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PgSQL Performance ML
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Realtime VACUUM, was:
performance of insert/delete/update
I always wandered if VACUUM is the right name
http://odbc.postgresql.org/
Regards, Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Horacio Miranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2002 14:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] about ODBC
Someone know any ODBC driver without problem with UPPER CASE ?
--
-Original Message-
From: David Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2002 20:18
To: David Walker
Cc: PostgreSQL Development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Boolean casting in 7.3 - changed?
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 04:34 PM, David Walker wrote:
Does this
-Original Message-
From: Karel Zak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 December 2002 11:26
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Christopher
Kings-Lynne wrote:
Hi guys,
Just out
-Original Message-
From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 06:17
To: psqlodbc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?
I am working on getting a shrink-wrapped version of
PostgreSQL for Windows
Currently it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 12:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any
issues? Anyone?
I've looked long and hard and can't find any license issues. Does
anyone
-Original Message-
From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 12:44
To: Dave Page
Cc: psqlodbc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shrinkwrap Windows Product, any issues? Anyone?
Dave Page wrote:
No problems with pgAdmin, though I do have to wonder
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 19:12
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
Development Group Announces
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Wow,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 23:34
To: Justin Clift
Cc: Dave Page; Marc G. Fournier; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
Development Group Announces
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 10:59
To: Dave Page
Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Marc G. Fournier; Bruce Momjian;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
Development Group Announces
I'll
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 13:56
To: Dave Page
Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Justin Clift; Bruce Momjian;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global
Development Group Announces
On Wed
-Original Message-
From: Lamar Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2002 04:23
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
However, I seriously question the need in the long term for
our sites to be as
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2002 06:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
I'm volunteering to do work here. I could at the very least
go through
the sites and make a
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2002 17:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group
Dave,
BTW, we do coordinate with the Website development group
When did that
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2002 16:48
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with function permissions
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would not have expected public to now have execute
-Original Message-
From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 January 2003 15:36
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Justin Clift;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Password Cracker
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:33, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Peter Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 12:28
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm just announcing here,
-Original Message-
From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 13:22
To: Peter Mount
Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
Peter Mount wrote:
However, the bugs link on the main page is
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 01:10
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: Dan Langille; Peter Eisentraut; Greg Copeland; Bruce
Momjian; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...
-Original Message-
From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 16:36
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Tom Lane; Hannu Krosing; Lamar Owen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant.
(2) Upgrade HAS HAS HAS to be fool proof.
Agreed.
No one is going to use it
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 20:34
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 20:42
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
Two thoughts:
Are there any plans to 'strip' the users lounge of
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 21:03
To: Dave Page
Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [webmaster] [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS
switched ...
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 21:06
To: Dave Page
Cc: Rod Taylor; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
Umm, Marc
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 22:03
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 19:40, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm just announcing here,
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2003 22:38
To: Dave Page
Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote:
There were always ads
-Original Message-
From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 03:05
To: Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Npgsql-general] Get function OID and function
calling support
Hi Francicso,
I could, however, call a function
-Original Message-
From: Lamar Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 06:12
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne; Hackers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde Schonig
On Monday 06 January 2003 21:01, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Yeah, the MS one - sorry 'bout that :-). I was feeling quite chipper
before another day of voip hell...
-Original Message-
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 21:28
To: Dave Page
Cc: Greg Copeland; Justin Clift; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 22:47
To: mlw
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc G. Fournier
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
This is a serious inquiry, very
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 15:01
To: Dave Page
Cc: Kristis Makris; Francisco Figueiredo Jr.;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Npgsql-general] Get function OID and
function calling support
So does NT iirc ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2003 15:00
To: Justin Clift
Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Next platform query: Alphaservers under VMS?
IIRC, they too have a POSIX layer
1 - 100 of 1699 matches
Mail list logo
