On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding to you.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii
Sorry for the delay in responding to you.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
No maybe. But I think that all the client
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
options.
I would
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
options.
I would consider the rest of the apps using it as a consensus. I will
make sure
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Phil
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
it will get
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
OK, here is the patch that handles the connection
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 09:55:29PM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote:
I think that output is important as do others up thread. I think it'd
be simpler to just disable dbname's ability to double as conninfo. If
we are looking for easy, that is.
I don't mind duplicating the behavior from
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage.
Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage.
Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm not sure whether
we have enough time to implement that. Instead, how about using
both PQconninfoParse()
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage.
Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm not sure whether
we have enough time to implement that. Instead, how about
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Phil Sorber escribió:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage.
Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
That's what it sounds like - confirming that PostgreSQL is really fully
shut down.
I'm not sure how you could do that over a protocol connection, myself.
I'd just read the postmaster pid from the pidfile on disk and then `kill
-0` it in a delay loop
2013/1/27 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
That's what it sounds like - confirming that PostgreSQL is really fully
shut down.
I'm not sure how you could do that over a protocol connection, myself.
I'd just read the postmaster pid from the pidfile on
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
set_pglocale_pgservice() should be called?
I think that the command name
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
We now haw to solve small puppet issue, because our puppets try to
start server too early, when old instance live still.
Maybe some new parameter - is_done can be useful.
Regards
Pavel
When the conninfo string including the hostname or port number is
specified in -d option,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
We now haw to solve small puppet issue, because our puppets try to
start server too early, when old instance live still.
Maybe some new parameter - is_done can be useful.
What about something like:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
We now haw to solve small puppet issue, because our puppets try to
start server too early, when old instance live still.
Maybe some new parameter - is_done can be
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
We now haw to solve small puppet issue, because our puppets try to
start server too
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
We now haw to solve small puppet issue, because
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Pavel Stehule
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Pavel Stehule
On 01/27/2013 06:20 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan
On Jan 26, 2013 6:56 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/27/2013 06:20 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/1/26 Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Stehule
On 01/27/2013 08:16 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote:
That's what it sounds like - confirming that PostgreSQL is really fully
shut down.
I'm not sure how you could do that over a protocol connection, myself.
I'd just read the postmaster pid from the pidfile on disk and then
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
set_pglocale_pgservice() should be called?
I think that the command name (i.e., pg_isready) should be given to
PQpingParams() as
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Phil Sorber
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
set_pglocale_pgservice() should be called?
I think that the command name (i.e., pg_isready) should be given to
PQpingParams() as fallback_application_name. Otherwise, the server
by default uses unknown as the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
Changing up the subject line because this is no longer a work in
progress nor is it pg_ping anymore.
OK, I committed this. However, I have one suggestion. Maybe it would
be a good idea to add a -c or -t option that sets the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
Changing up the subject line because this is no longer a work in
progress nor is it pg_ping anymore.
OK, I committed this. However, I have one
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
[rhaas pgsql]$ pg_isready -h www.google.com
grows old, dies
Do you think we should have a default timeout, or only have one if
specified at the command line?
+1 for default timeout
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
[rhaas pgsql]$ pg_isready -h www.google.com
grows old, dies
Do you think we should have a default timeout, or only
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
[rhaas pgsql]$ pg_isready -h www.google.com
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:50:01PM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:50:01PM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
+1 for default timeout --- if this isn't like ping where you are
expecting to run indefinitely, I can't see that it's a good idea
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
+1 for default timeout --- if this isn't like ping where you
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Phil Sorber p...@omniti.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Tom Lane
51 matches
Mail list logo
