On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:55:14PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Rohit Khare wrote:
> > > Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
> > > expected in pgAdmin:
> > >
> > > (1) Facility to insert a column in betwee
Robert Treat wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Rohit Khare wrote:
Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
expected in pgAdmin:
(1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table
design.
This I can s
On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Rohit Khare wrote:
> > Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
> > expected in pgAdmin:
> >
> > (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table
> > design.
>
> This I can see how people lik
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Well, contributions come in many forms, not just patches. Note too
> that almost all the requested features had nothing to do with core
> postgres, which is what this list is about
Well, as a driver developer I can tell you that the core teams attitude
toward driver driven
Comparing with MySQL/FireBird is not to be taken other-wise. Good things
need to be taken care of if they can benefit users. Yes, it is open source
and one can contribute code. But the level of expertise and skill also
matters. PGSQL development community involve experts in the areas of RDBMS,
C/C+
Neil Conway wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-08 at 09:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
So what are *you* doing about it? This is open source, where if you want
it and it's not there you make it. Otherwise you're just one more
whinger wanting something for nothing.
I don't agree with this attit
On Sat, 2007-04-08 at 09:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> So what are *you* doing about it? This is open source, where if you want
> it and it's not there you make it. Otherwise you're just one more
> whinger wanting something for nothing.
I don't agree with this attitude at all: we should be l
> --- Original Message ---
> From: "Rohit Khare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 04/08/07, 12:58:25
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] .NET driver
>
> Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following
Rohit Khare wrote:
> Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
> expected in pgAdmin:
>
> (1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table
> design.
This I can see how people like, actually. Theorists claim it's not
needed since column order really
Rohit Khare wrote:
Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
expected in pgAdmin:
(1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table
design.
(2) Facility to view relationship diagram.
(3) Facility to view table performance level graphically.
(4)
Seeing the history of PostgreSQL development, following features are
expected in pgAdmin:
(1) Facility to insert a column in between other columns during table
design.
(2) Facility to view relationship diagram.
(3) Facility to view table performance level graphically.
(4) More documented interface
Rohit Khare wrote:
PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is
the oldest product. Still its performance (in some areas) and GUI does
not match MySQL. MySQL .NET Driver gives very good performance for the
MySQL Database, FireBird .NET Driver gives performance for Fir
PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is the
oldest product. Still its performance (in some areas) and GUI does not match
MySQL. MySQL .NET Driver gives very good performance for the MySQL Database,
FireBird .NET Driver gives performance for FireBird.
Not only it is
Frank Wiles wrote:
ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In
fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from
pgfoundry:
And I've been using a threaded Perl on Linux/BSD systems for
years. In fact, unless someone recompiles Perl every Fedo
Hi.
Yeah, We have released Ver2.0 now. However, It is MS-VisualStudio and
somewhat difficult. Then, Some change of ADO2.0(.NET2.0)...
we want to clear a problem. However, It seems that very much time is
required one by one. There is many expectations. :-)
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Original M
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:19:36 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brar Piening wrote:
> > Robert Treat schrieb:
> >> That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to
> >> hackers, so I'd
> > Your'e right - of course.
> >
> > But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a l
Brar Piening wrote:
Robert Treat schrieb:
That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers,
so I'd
Your'e right - of course.
But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their
interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces
and s
Robert Treat schrieb:
That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers, so I'd
Your'e right - of course.
But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their
interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces and
some of the PostgreSQL-i
Andrei Kovalevski schrieb:
I have an experience with writing ODBC driver for PostgreSQL
(https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng/). I would be happy
to help community to improve .NET data provider.
Please join the Npgsql Project at http://pgfoundry.org/projects/npgsql
Francisco
On Thursday 02 August 2007 08:57, Andrei Kovalevski wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare:
> >>> I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET.
> >>> As stat
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare:
I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET.
As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless
integration and
On 8/2/07, Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare:
> > I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET.
> > As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless
> > integration and performance with .N
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2007-08-02 kell 11:24, kirjutas Rohit Khare:
> I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET.
> As stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless
> integration and performance with .NET. Instead when I used ODBC, the
> performance was comparat
23 matches
Mail list logo
