Seems like the debate has flared again.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gunnar Rønning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Per-Olof Norén" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:22 AM
Subject:
Hi again all,
First off, I´d like to declare that my intention is not to be a pain in the
B** :-)
Working on customer´s campuses equipped with laptop and a viennaSQL (a pure
java sql client) i have had
the need for many different drivers for different dbmses. The effort
involved getting
Hi folks
I'd like to make the JDBC driver comple with JDK1.4. I've got the
following list of errors and potential remedies. Does anyone have any
objections if I start work on this?
The following are the methods defined in JDK1.4 which are not currently
implemented in the JDBC driver:
javax.tran
Title: RE: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!
Why is this such a big issue? Shipping the Ant binary would be like shipping the make binary, which seems silly to me. However, I would far prefer to use Ant to build the JDBC driver. So, is it not possible to simply maintain a Makefil
Just a thought. Why not separate postgres and postgres jdbc in that
case?
Jayesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: Barry Lind
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant conf
> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.
>
> Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and
> redistribu
Ned Wolpert writes:
> Actuall, it does.
peter ~$ ant -version
Ant version 1.3 compiled on March 22 2001
peter ~$ echo $?
0
peter ~$ ant
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
Build failed
peter ~$ echo $?
0
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
--
Hi
Attached is a unified diff to DatabaseMetadata from the jdbc2 interface.
It fixes a bug where the metadata does not include the scale/precision
of the database columns.
We have been using this patch successfully for about 2 years, it would
be great to finally get it into the sources.
Suggest
I compiled postgres jdbc jar into jdbc.so using gcj and moved it into
usr/local/gcc/lib which is in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Then I created an application which uses jdbc and compiled it to native
code using gcj
now when I run the application, it's not able to find(load) the jdbc
driver.
Note that the
> Attached is a unified diff to DatabaseMetadata from the jdbc2 interface.
> It fixes a bug where the metadata does not include the scale/precision
> of the database columns.
>
> We have been using this patch successfully for about 2 years, it would
> be great to finally get it into the sources.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-Oct-2001 Jayesh K. Parayali wrote:
> Just a thought. Why not separate postgres and postgres jdbc in that
> case?
To be honest, this is the one thing I want to avoid if possible. Its important
that the postgres build system builds the 'offici
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > Seriously would installing GNU Make be enough, or would you need to install
| > Cygwin and other packages as well ?
|
| GNU make runs natively on Windows.
I know and I've used GNU Make when working with Windows, but that taught
me that you ofte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-Oct-2001 Shevland, Joseph (AU - Hobart) wrote:
>> Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and
>> redistribute it in order to build the jdbc code? Are their license
>> incompatibilities between the Apache License and the Postgre
Added to TODO:
o Move to using 'make' rather than 'ant'(?)
At least we know it is an issue for final decision.
---
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 23-Oct-2001 Jayesh K. Parayali wrote:
> > Just a thought. Why
> Gunnar R?nning writes:
>
> > Seriously would installing GNU Make be enough, or would you need to install
> > Cygwin and other packages as well ?
>
> GNU make runs natively on Windows.
We do allow ODBC to be built natively on MS Windows. Does that require
gmake or can it use native MSWin buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using ant 1.4.1
Also, try using it with a valid build.xml file and see how that works when the
build fails or succedes
On 23-Oct-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ned Wolpert writes:
>
>> Actuall, it does.
>
> peter ~$ ant -version
> Ant versio
Gunnar Rønning writes:
> | * In numerous attempts I have failed to convince Ant to place the built
> | files in a tree different from the source tree. This really makes it a
> | pain to build for multiple architectures (in Java, architecture =
> | different jdk).
>
> destdir="${build}"
Tom,
My reasons for not wanting to depend on Ant are:
Many binary distributions of Postgres are not including the JDBC code
because of the added overhead of the jdbc build process (i.e. getting
Ant installed).
Users have complained to the mail lists in the past about the
requirement for Ant
Gunnar Rønning writes:
> Seriously would installing GNU Make be enough, or would you need to install
> Cygwin and other packages as well ?
GNU make runs natively on Windows.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
---(end of broadca
Barry Lind writes:
> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.
My problem with Ant isn't primarily the availability or
20 matches
Mail list logo
