Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> > Y'know I was gonna check up on that because my recollection was that it was
> > a 2/2 split as well, though I thought that was of people who made their
> > view clear rather than just -core (whose opinion in this case is no more
> > important than any of the other long
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
Y'know I was gonna check up on that because my recollection was that
it was a 2/2 split as well, though I thought that was of people who
made their view clear rather than just -core (whose opinion in this
case is no more important than any of the other long time
contri
Y'know I was gonna check up on that because my recollection was that it was a
2/2 split as well, though I thought that was of people who made their view
clear rather than just -core (whose opinion in this case is no more important
than any of the other long time contributors imho). Don't suppos
On 8/27/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Is not quite complete
Only because it wasn't merged into the core. Which, like I said,
would be difficult to get consensus on design, grammar, and
implementation when it's a brand new and non-standard feature only a
few people understan
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Sun 8/27/2006 3:24 AM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Bruce Momjian; Tzahi Fadida; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib
It&#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Sun 8/27/2006 3:24 AM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Bruce Momjian; Tzahi Fadida; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib
> It's odd,
On 8/26/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, yes, it is used, and by far more that just hard core hackers.
OK. Kewl. I just hadn't run into many people (except hackers) that
knew about it. Thanks for sharing that.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
Ent
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 8/26/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your attitude has been lacking about this whole thing, as has a lot of
other people. PgFoundry is the official sub project site for PostgreSQL.
That may be the case. However, all I've seen+heard is conjecture that
On 8/26/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your attitude has been lacking about this whole thing, as has a lot of
other people. PgFoundry is the official sub project site for PostgreSQL.
That may be the case. However, all I've seen+heard is conjecture that
pgfoundry is a good thing
On 8/26/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is inaccurate, irresponsible and insulting to those of us who spend
time maintaining pgfoundry.
Andrew,
I'm sorry if it sounded that way... it wasn't meant as such.
It is not a graveyard. Plenty of stuff outside the core gets include
this is inaccurate, irresponsible and insulting to those of us who spend
time maintaining pgfoundry. It is not a graveyard. Plenty of stuff
outside the core gets included in packaged distributions - just see for
example what goes into the Windows distro, or the packages that CP
distributes.
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 8/25/06, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, we did not get enough feedback to include this in 8.2. Please
add it to pgfoundry and let's see how it goes.
Yep... it's too bad. A new feature no other database has now goes to
it's final resting place on p
On 8/25/06, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, we did not get enough feedback to include this in 8.2. Please
add it to pgfoundry and let's see how it goes.
Yep... it's too bad. A new feature no other database has now goes to
it's final resting place on pgfoundry.
--
Jonah H. Har
Sorry, we did not get enough feedback to include this in 8.2. Please
add it to pgfoundry and let's see how it goes.
---
Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> Hi,
> I wish to add the fulldisjunctions function to the contrib.
> With the help
14 matches
Mail list logo
