[PHP-DEV] RE: 4.0.5: Merge Request

Its doesnt at all :) We are using it as a temporary codename until we can think of a better one. - James > -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 April 2001 18:42 > To: James Moore > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5: Merge Request

you should subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list where discussion about a new bug system is occuring. - James > -Original Message- > From: Stephen van Egmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 April 2001 17:56 > To: Andi Gutmans > Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf; Zeev Suraski; Jani Taskinen; [EM

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5: Merge Request

> The QA process as it is IS a joke. Without the support from the developers > there aren't any possible ways that it can ever succeed. > It isn't the QA people who fix bugs. They just test and report to > developers > who should FIX those bugs. Some core developers seem to have forget this.. I c

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-WIN] xml with php

> Any guidance would be greatly appreciated, Please dont cross post like this these questions should be sent to php-general. I just got three copies of this in my mailbox which isnt really necessary now is it? - James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mai

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5, GD 2.0 and the zend.com weekly summary

irm/deny this? > > I'm not bothered either way, but I would like to correct the info > on the weekly summary if it is not going to appear in 4.0.5. > > --Wez. Its not in the branch and thus wont be in the release. - James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.perl.c

RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #8722 Updated: non blocking sockets reading doesn't work on WIN32

> > ID: 8722 > > Updated by: jmoore > > Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Old-Status: Open > > Status: Assigned > > Bug Type: Sockets related > > PHP Version: 4.0.4pl1 > > Assigned To: jmoore > > Comments: > > > Ill test the patch and commit if it works well. It looks right to me. > > james, thi

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt

> Stig Bakken wrote: > > Log: > > here's a preliminary list of stuff for 4.1 > > Is there any timeframe for when PHP 4.1.0 will be released? > > PS: When will PHP 4.0.5 be released? :) Well im not happy with the current state of some bugs in HTTP_AUTH section and waiting for a reply from

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5 modules

> Hi! > > Is there some policy about the inclusion of newly added modules to RC's? > I'ld like to see the dbx module in the 4.0.5 release... > > Cheerio, Marc. I dont think any new code should be added to the Release branch now, although this is a contentious issue but I think its a bit late in

[PHP-DEV] RE: changes

> > What are we doing with the current release right now? > > who is having problems and which problems are outstanding?? > > a single compiler warning issue - in ext/standard/exec.h there must be a > declaration of php_Exec: > > int php_Exec(int type, char *cmd, pval *array, pval *return_value);

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sockets sockets.c

> > Everyone, > > Can I merge this into the current RC? This should not cause > any problems. What are we doing with the current release right now? who is having problems and which problems are outstanding?? We have two possible MFH's that people want to do which shouldnt really be included at

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DEV] --with-pear[=DIR] patch

> > 4. The CGI version of PHP is always built and installed. > > I think this should be optional. Perhaps optionally disabled.. --without-cgi? James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: ; arg seperator

> Same here. I know there's a few things like this out there...I am going > to bed now. If no one else has done it before I wake, I'll start doing > some digging. > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following to Joey > Smith, PHP...: > > > At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrot

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ; arg seperator

Just to reply to myself we are fairly broken here according to rfc 2396 but if you guys think thats acceptable until 4.1 (whenever that might be) then thats fine.. Relavant part of RFC: 2.2. Reserved Characters Many URI include components consisting of or delimited by, certain special cha

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: ; arg seperator

> I disagree, we explicitly document that the arg_separator defaults to & > and that this is the character that separates url arguments. This follows > the original CGI specification. The fact that this is no longer the > accepted standard for this doesn't mean we can just up and change it in a

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> James, > > You have to be aware that now PHP has such a big user base we need to be > very careful in the changes we make especially when we can be pretty > certain that it might burn quite a lot of people. We can break > compatibility more easily when we have a major release (as from PHP 3 to

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> > Yes, that's true. I did ask (couple of times) before > > I committed that patch. And yes, now both & and ; are > > considered as arg separators. > > > > And I'd like to think that it's a feature than bug. ;) > > That would be true, if PHP would be some kind of reference > implementati

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> Anyone have an idea why this happens? > > Andi Shouldnt the ; be urlencoded (%3B works fine)?? James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP-4.0.5-RC6

> test.php >echo $test; > ?> > > http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3 This happens for me too with 4.0.5RC6 and yesterdays CVS. Is this the expected behaviour? shouldnt the ; be %3B (at which point you get the expected output.. I dont think that this is a bug. -James -- PHP Developm

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re[2]: [PHP-QA] RC6 available!

Sounds like your debugger was built against a different version of PHP (4.0.5RC1 or 4.0.4pl1, kill the loading of the debugger from your php.ini to test and it should not give the error. The zend people will provide a new debugger build against php 4.0.5 when its released im sure. - James > Com

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.5 Release Candidate testing

> Zeev's output buffering fix hasn't been committed yet; it's a one-line > change, and it makes the transparent output compression stuff work. MFH it then and we can get 4.0.5 out the door ;) James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] mail.c

I was just reading through mail.c and this stuck out to me as seeming a little strange.. can anyone explain it?? (lines 43-46) #ifdef COMPILE_DL_STANDARD ZEND_GET_MODULE(odbc) #endif Why is it odbc? is this a careless ctrl-c ctrl-v someone has done or should it actually be this? cheers, James

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.5 Release Candidate testing

> > 1. The function array_flip($array) puts one extra zero byte at > the end of > > each element in the return array thus making the result non binary safe. > > I've just fixed it in CVS. How critical is this? does it need to also be in 4.0.5 (sorry Zeev ;)) James -- PHP Development Mailing L

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

ibuting the latest version of PHP compiled or as source code with midguard so people can go one place and download midguard or midguard can be placed in PEAR but midgard is too bigger project to have in PHP cvs for the two systems release cycles to coordinate well so both are stable at the sam

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

> Um... > > If I'm not mistaken, the midgaurd extension itself, only provides > functionality to the "midguard" application? Ie, end-users of midguard > will not use the functions and classes exported by the extension, only > midguard will use that functionality? > > If so, I'm not too sure i

[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0.5 Release & Midgard Problems

ooner too. If nobody objects to this strongly I propose we do this in 24-48 hours and then release 4.0.5 which has been dragging on for a while now. James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHP Web Scripting: http://www.php.net/ PHP QA Team: http://qa.php.net/ PHP-GTK: http://gtk.php.net/ VL-SRM: h

[PHP-DEV] fastcgi

.5RC4\sapi\fastcgi\fastcgi.c(409) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before ',' D:\php-4.0.5RC4\sapi\fastcgi\fastcgi.c(409) : error C2059: syntax error : ')' Error executing cl.exe. Is this just me being totally stupid and not defining somthing I should or is th

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10000: corrupt http_post_vars when using session_start

> Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #1: corrupt http_post_vars when using Whoo 10k bugs.. Hmm is that somthing to be proud of or not?? ;) James -- James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5 RC2 Win32 Binaries?

> Any chance in getting the Win32 4.0.5 RC2 binaries built? The > 4.0.5 RC1 binaries did not include crypt() support, so I could > not fully test them on our test server. Ill pop a build up later although I dont know if I can get crypt support in there.. Ill try James -- PHP Development Mail

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1 packaged

You can grab win32 binaries from ftp://ftp.phpuk.org/php_binaries/ James > -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 March 2001 19:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-QA] 4.0.5RC1 packaged > > > http://www.php.net/distr

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request

> Full name: Steph Fox > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ID: sfox > Purpose: Working on php-gtk manual Can someone please add steph and give her karama for php-gtk/docs as shes been helping with parts of the manual (mainly correcting my terrible english.. ;0) Cheers, James -- James

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

> -Original Message- > From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 February 2001 09:52 > To: Hartmut Holzgraefe > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming > > > HH>> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5? > > ( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases > (X) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... > ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... and have [Undocumentated] ctyp

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9267 Updated: vars are set to "" instead of NULL

> 1) not mysql, mssql > > 2. it means that the mssql_result call failed for some reason, because > false was returned, not an empty string. > > still, the bug should be closed ;-) *Cough* I should really get some glasses ;) *cough* James -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-PEAR] PEAR issue #2 (pear-dev) vote

(X) pear-users and pear-dev James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Problem with strings on Win32

> ** > string(6) "" > > . So, the variable's type and size are set correctly, but not its value. > > I'm using yesterday's CVS on Windows 2000 Professional. Sascha already > checked this on his machine(s) and could NOT reproduce this. Sorry to ask this but your not being stupid and lo

RE: [PHP-DEV] Time for 4.0.5?

> Hum, having just contributed to said download size... we've done our > best to > minimize the KLOC, removing some cruft and moving a couple of functions > into > a (separate) library, but we'd be down to stripping comments to go > further... > the only other thing I could suggest is using bzip2

RE: [PHP-DEV] Midgard (Was: cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore...)

> > > With the PHP4 version of Midgard, patching is no longer a necessity. > > > It's an ordinary extension like the others. > > > > Perhaps it would be an idea to move it out of the main PHP CVS > (into another > > cvs module) for now and put links on php.net, personally I > would really like > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Midgard (Was: cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore...)

> > At 22:11 12/2/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >The idea here is that Midgard has a large installed base of > users, all of > > >whom have to run a modified version of PHP. The extension, > albeit rather > > >large at this point, is supposed to provide the basic > functionality in the > > >st

[PHP-DEV] FW: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard .cvsignore ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.in access.c article.c attachment.c calendar.c config.m4 element.c event.c eventmember.c file.c fudge genentry.pl group.c ho

Thought this should really be brought up on Dev list rather than CVS list but personally I dont think that midgard has a place in the main distributions CVS.. maybe im wrong but if we begin to put all full applications in CVS just because they are useful we are going to bloat. Whats the difference

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4032 Updated: Major security issue PHP+Apache

Liz, Was this issue fixed and does it still occur? Can you still reproduce it? Thanks James -- James Moore PHP QA Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Liz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 February 2001 02:08 > To: Bug Database > Subject: [PHP-DEV

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2483 Updated: set_file_buffer return value

cant === sort this one out in php4 James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 February 2001 18:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2483 Updated: set_file_buffer return > value > > > ID: 2483 > Updated by: jimw > R

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2328 Updated: I would like animated gif support within php.

whats wrong with gd? Although current version doesnt support it there are lots of patched versions avalible. James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 February 2001 18:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2328 Updat

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Dear Friends & Future Millionaire:

> Top priority for me is that common list operations must not > require manual attention. There were more than 16,000 > different senders on our lists so far. And only a small > fraction of those addresses are subscribed. Do you really > want to approve all those sender add

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request

Im intrigued though.. what does inki want to do with a CVS account?? I think inki is a secret MSFT operative sent to introduce bugs into PHP as its kicking ASP's arse :) James > This is certainly one for the archives ;-) > > -Sterling > > > > Full name: Ingmar Heinrich > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /win32 time.c

works now. Ill look and see if theres a way to make it as accurate as the *nix version. James > -Original Message- > From: James Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 February 2001 15:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /win32 time

RE: [Fwd: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9094: Microseconds seem to be untrue values]

Ill have to eat my words and find what else could be causeing the problems :) James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assaurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but:

erability without knowing your > > servers setup. It is possible, but personally I wouldn't worry too much > > about it although you should urge your ISP to upgrade to 4.0.4pl1. > > > > Andi > > > > At 08:07 PM 1/27/2001 +, James Moore wrote: > > &

RE: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but:

her an upgrade is necessary. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: moshe doron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 January 2001 19:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] ooops, i thought it new one but: >

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net\version4\downloads directory gone! How to build on win32 without?

Its in CVS now isnt it. http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php4/bindlib_w32/ also number.c is now included in PHP. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline

ich could contradict or at least not be compatible with each other, I can see no mention of the jurisdiction that these issues should be resolved in.. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe,

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: question about this patch release (fwd)

Jani, What is the exact setup of the machines? Do you know or can you find this out. Apache Version, httpd.conf A sample vhost would be good so I can see how the include paths are set. And any other relevant information we can get off them to make it easier to reproduce. Especially any details of

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP script source revealed on windows

released in a few hours then more information on this will be made avalible and will be posted in the appropriate places. James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

t know if I would like to see it in production enviroment yet but under Win 2k IIS5 it seems Good. Under NT 4 AFAIK it is terrible for some unknown reasons. If we can get the few win issues sorted then I think maybe then it will be up to product standards under win2k and IIS 5. (I can never seem

<    1   2