php-general Digest 10 Feb 2010 11:49:15 - Issue 6583
Topics (messages 301913 through 301924):
Re: SOAP connect error
301913 by: Shawn McKenzie
301914 by: Eric Lommatsch
Re: howto do informative error handling without the fatalities
301915 by: clancy_1.cybec.com.au
On 9 February 2010 16:47, Ryan Sun ryansu...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, Richard, maybe you are right, the actual file name is not my job
I changed it to 'php://temp' but its still the same, nothing has been
changed...
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Richard Quadling
rquadl...@googlemail.com
On 9 February 2010 22:14, Eric Lommatsch er...@micronix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shawn McKenzie [mailto:nos...@mckenzies.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:07 PM
To: Eric Lommatsch
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: SOAP connect error
Eric Lommatsch wrote:
Hello,
On 9 February 2010 22:25, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:09:05 +, rquadl...@googlemail.com (Richard
Quadling) wrote:
On 9 February 2010 14:20, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:19 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Richard wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
allowing IE8 to install on W2k
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:02 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
Try http://www.seekposition.net/php-encode
Ignore everything, just enter the code and check if it still works.
On 2/8/10, Brian Dunning br...@briandunning.com wrote:
Hey all -
I'm selling a custom PHP solution to FileMaker users. It uses FileMaker's
PHP API, so everyone who has FileMaker
At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:41 -0500, tedd wrote:
At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a web
developers mailing list right?
The
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
technology, which could go some way to explaining the abysmal
Richard Quadling wrote:
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
web
developers mailing
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
From: Ashley Sheridan
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:20 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Ashley Sheridan
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010
hi all
having trouble here with a site that I am hosting on go-daddy
I want to keep my php and my images apart
so to do this I have the base directory which contains the php scripts.
On the directory above that I have
my photos stored in /photos
when I run my scripts I get the following:
On 10 February 2010 14:33, דניאל דנון danondan...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device
Use ROT26 for best security
I can't read a word of that!
--
-
Richard Quadling
Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!
EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html
EE4Free :
On 10 February 2010 16:31, Pat patrick.j.r...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
having trouble here with a site that I am hosting on go-daddy
I want to keep my php and my images apart
so to do this I have the base directory which contains the php scripts. On
the directory above that I have
my photos
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as W3C still refusing to
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
The W3C validator rejects that autocomplete attribute because it still
isn't in any valid standard. Some browsers have introduced it, and PCI
requires it to be there for browsers that recognise it, but it's not a
good security feature, as browsers don't have to honor it
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:20 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What about search engines? Will there be any impact on these,
particularly with regards to semantic content?
I expect semantic markup to (eventually) improve how pages are indexed.
Also, are there any browsers that would fall over with unknown tags? I
know IE
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one element that needs to be
That meaning the message? I'll re-send it now:
Try http://www.seekposition.net/php-encode
Ignore everything, just enter the code and check if the code still works.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Richard Quadling
rquadl...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 10 February 2010 14:33, דניאל דנון
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:56:36PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
snip
The interesting things in my websites go on behind-the-scenes, in the PHP,
and produce
relatively straightforward HTML. I have avoided the well-known bugs in IE6,
and think my
webpages display correctly on any of
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
allowing IE8 to
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not exactly the semantic meaning
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's aside, but it's not
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
aside. Sure it's
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar
Brian Dunning wrote:
But I do want to add some level of code obfuscation to prevent them
from making simple changes to my code that allow them to exceed the
privileges they've purchased.
I have used PHP Processor 1.5 from http://gridinsoft.com for this. Back
when I was looking
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of aside as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
the standard sidebar. - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
Unfortunatley I examined that side quite
Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
It took very little work since I was essentially doing that already.
aside is the most logical html 5 layout tag for describing the
sidebar
in a two
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings rob...@interjinn.com wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
the standard sidebar. - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
Unfortunatley I examined
From the editor's draft:
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
element, and which could be considered separate from that content. Such
sections are often represented as sidebars in printed
tedd wrote:
At 1:38 PM -0500 2/10/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Agreed. Those make sense to demarcate the structure layout of the
document... but still, for styling the class makes more sense since it
keeps the specificity low and easy to override (especially true for
skinnable apps). In my
Good day,
May I ask you, gurus, whether it is possible to set a flag in PHP that
persists for the duration of the server being switched on?
If the server would be power cycled, the flag would be off. Similarly if
the web server would be restarted the flag would be off also.
I do realize that
Op 2/11/10 5:42 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
Thank you for the hints given. I'll look into the various options given.
The main reason for the need for a persistent flag in memory is that
several installations where the PHP code would be deployed do not have
access to crontab, so I am simulating
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:08:42 +1030, james.mcl...@gmail.com (James McLean) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
I'm basically familiar with the UNIX permissions - 'owner', 'group', or
'other', but I
have no real idea how these apply to webpage users under PHP.
Hello guys, I encountered a syntax error, and cannot figure out the
reason, for example:
== CODE ==
1:?php
2:$opts = array ('header'='str1'.'str2');
3:?
===
Works fine, but when I try to put it into a class,
Dasn wrote:
I got the syntax error. Why?
Read the first paragraph on the following page.
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.properties.php
[quote]
... This declaration may include an initialization, but this initialization must be a constant
value--that is, it must be able to be
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
2. you are tackling the problem incorrectly
at any rate, as far I'm concerned, you should never have a long
*haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
content below...
Jochem Maas wrote:
Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
From the editor's draft:
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the
Op 2/11/10 6:34 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
2. you are tackling the problem incorrectly
at any rate, as far I'm
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 06:46 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
Op 2/11/10 6:34 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
2. you
2010/2/11 Jim Lucas li...@cmsws.com
Dasn wrote:
I got the syntax error. Why?
only constant literal is allowed.
You can think that it is static complie but not on runtime .
Regards,
Eric,
Read the first paragraph on the following page.
59 matches
Mail list logo
