Hi,
I'm trying to package jquey-ui-rails and ran into jquery-ui version
conflicts. jquery-ui-rails embeds a version of jquery-ui and easiest
option would be to ship jquery-ui-rails as is, but it would mean
duplication of libjs-jquery-ui package. So I thought of depending on
libjs-jquery-ui package
2014-04-14 0:33 GMT+05:30, Per Andersson :
> Does different minor versions break compatibility between libjs-jquery-ui
> and
> ruby-jquery-ui-rails?
I hope it would only be fixes.
> Do you know if it is difficult or a lot of work to carry patches in
> ruby-jquery-ui-rails
> to fix possible incomp
On Saturday 10 January 2015 11:55 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone help me with libjs-jsxc package? It ships jsxc.dep.min.js and
> when trying to minify it using yui-compressor I get the following error.
>
> java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't fi
Hi,
Can anyone help me with libjs-jsxc package? It ships jsxc.dep.min.js and
when trying to minify it using yui-compressor I get the following error.
java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name
org.mozilla.javascript.resources.Messages, locale en_US
package is in team rep
package: libjs-jquery
version: 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2
severity: important
justification: original repo is no longer maintained and diaspora
depends on jeresig fork
Dear maintainer,
Please switch jquery.hotkeys to jeresig fork which is maintained.
https://github.com/jeresig/jquery.hotkeys/
On Monday 12 January 2015 11:49 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> package: libjs-jquery
> version: 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2
> severity: important
> justification: original repo is no longer maintained and diaspora
> depends on jeresig fork
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Plea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package: libjs-backbone
version: 0.9.10-3
severity: wishlist
please update to 1.2.0.0 version, it is required by diaspora 0.5.3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV5eXVAAoJEM4fnGdFEsIqvRIP/123yB4q/frzHKiJ35IREamm
PNy2i
package: nodejs
version: 4.3.0~dfsg-2
severity: wishlist
I'm trying to backport gitlab to jessie and it depends on nodejs >= 4.0.
I got the following error when trying to build it.
g++ '-DNODE_ARCH="x64"' '-DNODE_PLATFORM="linux"'
'-DNODE_WANT_INTERNALS=1' '-DV8_DEPREC
ATION_WARNINGS=1' '-DNODE_
On Monday 07 March 2016 04:22 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-handlebars is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), s
package: jqueryui
version: 1.10.1+dfsg-1
Please update jqueryui to 1.11.4 which has support for bower and
required to package rails-assets-jquery.ui (a dependency for diaspora).
I tried to update it, but watch file is not functional and there is no
README.source (fakeroot debian/rules get-orig-so
Control: severity -1 wishlist
This is not a minified file, only browserified. Though ideally we should
browserify it in debian, grunt is still not packaged. Since its still a
human readable and modifiable format, I don't think DFSG applies here.
When node-grunt is available in the archive, we can
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:41:17 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-07-10 18:40:53)
> > This is not a minified file, only browserified. Though ideally we
> > should browserify it in debian, grunt is still not packaged. Since i
package: libjs-uglify
version: 2.4.15-6
severity: wishlist
I'd like to update ruby-uglifier to 3.0.2 version (for updating diaspora
to 0.6). It ships with 2.7.3 of uglify.js. It would be better to have
the matching version in debian.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-
nodejs bin/uglifyjs --help
module.js:339
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'yargs'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:337:15)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:287:25)
at Module.require (module.js:366:17)
at require (module.js:385:17)
at Object.
(/hom
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: important
$ npm2deb search nomnom
Looking for similiar package:
None
Looking for existing repositories:
pkg-javascript/node-nomnom -- Packaging for node-nomnom
Looking for wnpp bugs:
None
Looking for packages in NEW:
None
prav
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: grave
justification: it should not crash
$ npm2deb search lex-parser
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/npm2deb", line 7, in
sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/npm2deb/scripts.py", line 139, in
main
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: grave
justification: breaks package build
So npm2deb should use the correct file in debian/install
dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "package.json" (tried in "."
and "debian/tmp")
dh_install: node-jju missing files: package.json
dh_install: miss
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: wishlist
It would be better to automate 'uscan --download-current-version' as
part of npm2deb as watch file is created correctly and manual step does
not give any advantage.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel
uupdate -b can also be run automatically. Once we have all required
files, we should run dpkg-buildpackage as well like gem2deb does for
ruby gems.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists
On ഞായര് 09 ഒക്ടോബര് 2016 04:43 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> some modules has package.yaml instead of package.json
>
> Could you provide an existing package name and/or simple testcase for this?
>
node-jju package has package.yaml.
Similarly colors.js does not have a package.json file,
On ഞായര് 09 ഒക്ടോബര് 2016 05:59 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> node-jju package has package.yaml.
>
> Can't seem to find this package in the archive!
This was accepted only a few hours back. See
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: grave
justification: it breaks build
^1.1.0 and similar should be converted to debian format like >= 1.1.0
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency node-jju (^1.1.0)
dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Depends field:
, nodejs
,
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: wishlist
Currently only a require test is run as autopkgtest. It would be better
to run all test run during build are also run as autopkgtest. gem2deb
does this for ruby packages already.
This will make it easy to update dependencies as we can run the
a
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: important
When running npm2deb create JSONSelect it should create package as
node-jsonselect instead of node-JSONSelect.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debia
We cannot reproduce it on other machines. Local machine is dist-upgraded
today in sid, but the issue remains.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 20:36:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> ^1.1.0 and similar should be converted to debian format like >= 1.1.0
node-formatio uses >= 1.x for samsam dependency, it should be converted
to 1.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-deve
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 21:24:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Currently only a require test is run as autopkgtest. It would be better
> to run all test run during build are also run as autopkgtest. gem2deb
> does this for ruby packages already.
You can just look for "scripts: test:&qu
On 2016, ഒക്ടോബർ 13 11:30:08 PM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>according to LICENSE copyright holder for "File: *" are three people.
>So
>better put them instead the entry from package.json into your
>debian/copyright.
Done.
>Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>===
>
>Please feel free to respond
On 2016, ഒക്ടോബർ 15 5:30:08 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>please mention:
>JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/css/droid_sans.tt
>JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/js/showdown.js
>JSONSelect-d642d73c1ff71627fc989e194875725c71b8d5a2/site/
Control: -1 tags pending
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:10:01 + Santiago Vila wrote:
> npm install jison
> make[1]: npm: Command not found
jison is just uploaded to debian, so npm is no longer required. Once it
clears NEW, I'll upload a fixed version that uses jison package via apt.
signature.asc
On Thursday 13 October 2016 12:30 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> scripts/preroll mentions some other authors not in d/copyright
Fixed and uploaded.
> -- Chris Lamb Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:48:47 +
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:35:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> We cannot reproduce it on other machines. Local machine is dist-upgraded
> today in sid, but the issue remains.
>
I figured out the issue, it can find existing packages only if deb-src
line is present in apt sources. I thin
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
sverity: important
jison and other cli programs have this issue.
Execution permission for /usr/lib/nodejs/jison/lib/cli.js gets stripped
and a symlink to this file from /usr/bin is not sufficient.
/usr/lib/nodejs/bin/mocha seems to be retains its execution permi
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 21:28:54 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:35:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
> > We cannot reproduce it on other machines. Local machine is dist-upgraded
> > today in sid, but the issue remains.
> >
>
> I figured out t
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: important
'_' should be converted to '-' and capital letters should be converted
to small letters.
$ npm2deb search string_decoder
Looking for similiar package:
None
Looking for existing repositories:
pkg-javascript/node-string-decoder -- Pa
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
node module where this happened: repeat-string
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: wishlist
For example, if you take the module level,
npm view level dist.tarball
https://registry.npmjs.org/level/-/level-1.4.0.tgz
We can take this tarball and information on
https://registry.npmjs.org/level/ to look for newer versions.
We will have t
https://github.com/jonschlinkert/to-regex-range also got the same
issue. its has tags like 0.2.0 instead of v0.2.0.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mail
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:36:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
> node module where this happened: repeat-string
>
Also failed for
https://github.com/isaacs/isexe/releases
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascr
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 11:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-os-homedir is NEW.
> source:node-os-homedir is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> OpenPGP sig
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:56:08 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> This package is in main, but it depends on node-ebnf-parser and node-cjson,
> which are both in contrib.
These were uploaded in contrib because they were built using jison from
npm (bootstrapping circular dependency). Now new versions of bo
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.5-1
severity: wishlist
An example module is jquery-textcomplete
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javas
package: npm2deb
severity: important
version: 0.2.5-1
Example module builtin-modules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-dev
package: node-jsdom
version: 0.8.10+dfsg1-1
severity: serious
Justification: depends on a package that is planned to be removed
Control: block 842022 by -1
contextify has rc bugs and is going to be removed. It is required for
node < 0.12 only. jsdom should be updated to a version that does not use
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:03:35 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:36:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
> >
> > node module where this happened: repeat-string
> >
> Also failed for
> https://github.com/isaacs/isexe/releases
>
This happens
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:13:51 + shana...@disroot.org wrote:
> All npm modules should have a package.json.
>
> The issue is npm2deb retrieves module source from git repo instead of npm
> registry.
>
> This will be fixed with #842465
> (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842465)
Hi,
node-global-prefix tests expect global prefix to be /usr/local but gets
/usr.
Full error log here https://github.com/jonschlinkert/global-prefix/issues/15
Strangely the test fails only in a clean chroot, so patching the test
will make it fail in a local build. Package is pushed to team repo
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 14:18:47 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:
> uupdate -b can also be run automatically. Once we have all required
> files, we should run dpkg-buildpackage as well like gem2deb does for
> ruby gems.
>
We can make this with just 'npm2deb ' (instead of changing
n
On Sunday 30 October 2016 12:50 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> These I'd keep on hold until we do 0.4.3-1.
We are also waiting to update node-findup-sync for grunt, but it needs a
few more dependencies to be packaged (they are waiting for packages in NEW)
See https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 11:32:47 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:
> severity: grave
> justification: breaks package build
reducing severity to important, this does not have to block the release
as it happens only in a few packages and which can easily be
On Saturday 29 October 2016 08:52 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
>
> Accepted:
Any idea why this is still stuck in NEW and not getting built?
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/npm2deb_0.2.5-3.html
I see some other packages in NEW with similar issue where maintainer
looks like "all Build Daemo
On Monday 31 October 2016 03:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> reducing severity to important, this does not have to block the release
>> as it happens only in a few packages and which can easily be fixed.
>
> The tag is "severity", not "complexity": If the bug cause failure to
> build packages t
On Tuesday 01 November 2016 03:09 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> That's a very helpful overview, and it makes it clear that it's quite a
> lot of work.
Yup, we have been doing it for some time as part of
igg.me/at/debian-browserify campaign.
> - node-os-homedir has an ITP bug http://bugs.debian.org/84
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:09 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Next I'd create branch from there with branch name "debian/sid" and work
> on that that branch to avoid interfering with the master branch.
>
> Any comments ?
You can just work on the master branch. We do all the work targeting sid
on
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:46 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> For this one it seems the master branch has some commits targeting
> experimental (4.3.0+dfsg-1 and 3.9.3+dfsg-1) that have not made it to to
> sid yet:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/tree/debian/changelo
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 03:50 PM, shana...@disroot.org wrote:
> Does debian allow installation of multiple version of same npm module
> via package manager ?.
>
> If not how will debian manage version conflicts like module a requires
> module c@1 and module b requires c@2 ?
We'll update mod
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:11 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Fine, can you review what I have done so far and if it's OK sponsor it ?
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/log/?h=debian/master-2.4
I have uploaded it even though there are other possible improvements
(l
On 2016, നവംബർ 3 8:44:12 AM IST, Lucas Castro wrote:
>I was looking at node-chalk that's already is in Debian.
>
>But it's not all its build dependences in debian.
Some of them are optional, used only for code coverage, linting etc.
We are mostly interested in running tests and mocha is alrea
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 20:36:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:
> severity: grave
> justification: it breaks build
Only affects newly created packages
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript
[adding debian-ruby]
On Sunday 23 October 2016 04:23 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> jQuery 3.0 was release back in June, so in principle affected upstreams
> had at least a few months to deal with any fallout. If that's not the
> case, you can refer upstream to this upgrade guide, which documents t
On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:30 PM, Sruthi Chandran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated node-lodash to 4.16.6 and pushed to Alioth.
>
> Please review and upload.
It has 3 reverse dependencies, node-globule, libjs-backbone and glances.
node-globule is updated in git so we can upload together with
On 2016, നവംബർ 12 4:30:10 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>according to
> https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt/issues/1478
>and an entry in the CHANGELOG, the copyright holder is no longer Ben
>but the jQuery Foundation. So please update your debian/copyright.
Updated.
>Thanks!
> Thor
Hi,
Using globally installed grunt is not supported upstream (see
https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/issues/10). With
https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/pull/55 patch, I was able to ignore
the error but it fails to read package.json now
$ grunt
Loading "Gruntfile.js" tasks...ERROR
>> Error: U
On Saturday 12 November 2016 04:31 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using globally installed grunt is not supported upstream (see
> https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/issues/10). With
> https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-cli/pull/55 patch, I was able to ignore
> the error bu
package: node-should
version: 8.4.0~dfsg-1
severity: important
Without this every module that looks for node-should needs patching.
Right now, this fails for node-nodeunit
Error: Cannot find module 'should-type'
at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:325:15)
at Function.Module._lo
On Thursday 03 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> unfortunately I have to reject your package.
>
> Please mention at least package/runtime.js in your debian/copyright.
Fixed and uploaded.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if
Hi,
Can someone help browserify fuzzaldrin-plus? This will allow me to use
packaged libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus instead of embedded fuzzarldin-plus.js in
gitlab.
You'll need to build node-grunt-contrib-coffee from alioth and run grunt
to covert .coffee to .js
Also it would be nice if we have a grunt-b
On Friday 18 November 2016 09:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Though the released version of fuzzaldrin-plus does not have browserify
> task in Gruntfile, github master branch has it.
After downloading the master branch, I could get browserify-lite to
work. So it looks like browserify-lite
On Friday 18 November 2016 09:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Also it would be nice if we have a grunt-browserify-lite module which
> will allow us to just change browserify task to browserify-lite in
> Gruntfile and be done.
Requested this feature upstream, but if any of you here can
package: node-lodash
severity: important
version: 4.16.6+dfsg-1
control: block -1 by 836722
Some dependencies for gulp [1] declare dependencies like
lodash.assignwith which current lodash package is not providing.
Though this would require updating unglifyjs as current version throws
and error wh
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> to-fast-properties-1.0.2/license seems to contain a different person than
> your debian/coypright.
>
> Thorsten
Fixed.
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your fil
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please mention TJ Holowaychuk in your debian/copyright.
>
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
Fixed.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 04:38 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I packaged node-string-width as per this ITP
> https://bugs.debian.org/845240, this is the repo:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-string-width.git
> it's set up for git-buildpackage.
>
> Please someone more ex
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 03:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this doesn't work, does it?
> W: node-window-size: unusual-interpreter usr/lib/nodejs/window-size/cli.js
> #!node
Ah! I overlooked that as another warning about lack of execution
permission. Fixed.
> Thorsten
>
>
>
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:03:22 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-09-05 09:22:06)
> > nodejs bin/uglifyjs --help
> > module.js:339
> > throw err;
> > ^
> >
> > Error: Cannot find module 'yargs
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:19 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I got this when running the updated uglifyjs package (before seeing your
>> previous comment about yargs).
>
> What version is "the updated uglifyjs package"?
latest upstream release which needs yargs.
>
>> We are getting close to
On Sunday 20 November 2016 10:34 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-babel-runtime is NEW.
> binary:node-babel-runtime is NEW.
> source:node-babel-runtime is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was ot
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Ah, I understand you now: You present breakage when using code not in
> Debian. Quite confusing - please *always* mention explicitly in
> bugports when using non-Debian packages!
Sorry, that was mostly meant a self note (I should h
On Saturday 19 November 2016 10:19 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW.
> binary:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW.
> source:node-grunt-contrib-coffee is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to pro
Control: tags -1 pending
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 03:04 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [33mWarning: Task "coffee" not found. Use --force to continue.[39m
missed builddeps on node-grunt-contrib-coffee. Fixed. But
node-grunt-contrib-coffee needs to clear NEW.
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 03:30 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Missing attribution for Ben Alman (and possibly more).
>
> -- Chris Lamb Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:34:52 +
>
Fixed.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or
package: node-rimraf
version: 2.2.8-1
severity: wishlist
with current version node-y18n tests fail, once rimraf is updated, we
can enable node-y18n tests. Also many other libs would benefit from a
recent version.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mail
package: node-lru-cache
version: 2.3.1-1
severity: wishlist
this is required for updating node-cross-spawn and which in turn is
required for packaging execa.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
h
On Saturday 26 November 2016 03:05 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I packaged node-cliui as per this ITP:
> https://bugs.debian.org/845266, this is the repo:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-cliui.git
> it's set up for git-buildpackage and pristine-tar.
>
> Please someone mo
On Saturday 26 November 2016 02:59 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I packaged node-wrap-ansi as per this ITP
> https://bugs.debian.org/845262, this is the repo:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-wrap-ansi.git
> it's set up for git-buildpackage and pristine-tar.
>
> Please som
On 2016, നവംബർ 26 6:34:26 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i've been doing in all my latest uploads this setup:
>- autopkgtest runs the package test suite
>- build does not run tests
>
>Because:
>1) it feels wrong to add Depends to Build-Depends,
>and debian/tests/control already have all the
On Saturday 26 November 2016 11:23 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Side question - Do you know why we're not there yet ?
I guess its because autopkgtest is new service and we don't want to
disrupt this release with more rc bugs. It may change in next release
cycle and autopkgtest failure can be rc.
> Hav
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:02:29 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
From upstream discussion,
"The bug is that the Global destructor runs at process exit and tries to
free the object slot but that doesn't work because the
Control: tags -1 pending
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:24:44 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I can understand how might have seen the clues as being "right around
> the corner".
yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Saturday 26 November 2016 06:18 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-yargs is NEW.
> binary:node-yargs is NEW.
> source:node-yargs is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had
On 2016, നവംബർ 26 6:34:26 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i've been doing in all my latest uploads this setup:
>- autopkgtest runs the package test suite
>- build does not run tests
>
>Because:
>1) it feels wrong to add Depends to Build-Depends,
>and debian/tests/control already have all the
package: node-through2
version: 1.1.1-1
severity: wishlist
cloneable-readable (dependency for gulp) needs through2 >= 2.0.1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-
On Sunday 27 November 2016 08:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please take care of all FIX_MEs in debian/*.
Fixed. Filed a wishlist bug (#846009) against lintian so we can find it
before upload.
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if yo
On Sunday 27 November 2016 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> almost done: Andrei Mackenzie is missing ...
fixed and uploaded.
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> con
Hi,
I find these scripts very useful so I thought of sharing it more widely.
I use it for ruby, go and nodejs packages.
Scripts are here
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/pkg-ruby-extras.git
1. git clone
2. add cloned location to PATH,
3. and run `setup`, (this will create sbuild c
On തിങ്കള് 28 നവംബര് 2016 05:49 രാവിലെ, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>* New upstream version 4.0.2
This broke node-cross-spawn-aysnc, I think this type of dependency
declaration is not sustainable.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-cross-spawn-async.git/tree/debian/control#n2
Message
Subject: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lru-cache_4.0.2-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPTED into unstable
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:18:00 +0100
From: Jérémy Lal
To: Pirate Praveen
CC: Debian Javascript Maintainers
2016-11-28 11:10 GMT+01:00 Pirate Praveen :
> On തിങ്കള് 28 നവംബര് 2016 0
Control: block -1 by 846076
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:08:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted.
>
Hi Jonas,
I have prepared the package in git and it is almost ready for upload.
Can you review and fix these two warnings and upl
On 2016, നവംബർ 28 10:27:15 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Hi this is opinionated but very useful. I have a couple of newbie
>questions.
>
>Did you try these scripts on Debian stable as host ?
No, I have not tried.
>Why do we need two virtualization systems (schroot for sbuild & lxc for
>autopkgt
On 2016, നവംബർ 29 10:05:58 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Cannot build the new uglifyjs until bug#846076 is resolved.
This is now fixed.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-
1 - 100 of 693 matches
Mail list logo
