On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 02:44, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 16:17:34 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Since we need to
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 16:17:34 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Since we need to advertise this list, I think we should do a Bits From
our team. I have started a
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Since we need to advertise this list, I think we should do a Bits From
our team. I have started a draft in
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom, so please add
anything you think we should be saying.
That's a really
Hi all,
shortly:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
1. Mailing list
I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
discussion list (for instance for discussion like this) for a Debian
Multimedia Blend and for an entry point
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:12:47PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Bugreports have been mentioned as an example of inappropriate mails for such
list, right? So what is then on-topic? Is it for visions and metadesign -
like a multimedia-specific d-project@ ? Or is it more of a
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to come back to a thread about a Multimedia Blend which was
started in August this year[1]. There was some discussion but no obvios
action. Yesterday I was able to do at least a bit of action *I* feel
able
[Quick answere from Hotel in Sevillia]
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I apologise again for having forgotten about this discussion.
No problem - thanks for taking action now.
potential Multimedia Blend - just agree upon a fieldname (UpstreamDoc
comes to
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
1. Mailing list
I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
discussion list (for instance for discussion like this) for a
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 19:58, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
1. Mailing list
I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi Andreas!
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
|--== On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:10 +0200, Andreas Tille
|--== andr...@an3as.eu said:
AT On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
As seen on the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/
Yes, the DeMuDi idea is quite old and eventually evolved in the 64
Studio project, which is more a Debian remix/customization than an
official
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do you
see a chance that we move
Hey,
|--== On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:01:43 +0200, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu
said:
AT On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
AT Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/
Same here! :)
Yes, the DeMuDi idea is quite
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
merged into this one (d-multime...@lists.debian.org).
Thanks for reminding me that the
[quoting myself in parts]
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:01:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
That's perfectly fine. So I will move any imaging related stuff to some
Debian Imaging area which I will keep on maintaining for my own purposes
This is just done and the imaging stuff is not any more
On 09/08/10 06:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
merged into this one
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Probably. So, if there was no actual technical work involved, we'll just
start from your definitions.
OK.
for each project. However I would recommend to keep all the tasks files
in one place just to enable easier general
(CCing Andreas because I don't know if you are subscribed)
On 07/08/10 14:58, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I'm inspired by the following IRC log to rephrase my mail I recently
sended to debian-enterprise list[1]:
fsateler :) I'm liking this more and more. I would really appreciate it if
you
19 matches
Mail list logo
