As you have apparently now learned, there is a big difference between the
sendmail package and the postfix sendmail command (which exists for
compatibility reasons and is part of Postfix so no need to try to install it
independently).
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan
results in a
very quick implementation of new ideas (where else can you offer an idea and a
good reason for it and have a patch implementing it in a few hours?).
All in all, well done!
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 5:20 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-us
tarlet. Many references to Starlet
remained at that time both inside files and as file names. I just checked on a
current version VMS system I can access - found 18 STARLET* filenames in the
system library directory.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
mand line, the mail enters Postfix via the pickup
service. That’s completely different from smtpd (that’s the SMTP daemon).
Command line works because having the mail enter via pickup does not use the
bad smtpd_…_restrictions parameters.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
-line documentation.
Anyway, thanks for the reply. All works as desired now.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jul 27, 2020, at 11:05 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> I’m trying to figure out how to tell make {install | upgrade} to install
> sendmail eleswhere? I tried sendmail_path=/usr/local/sbin as well as
> -DDEF_SENDMAIL_PATH and while that changes the default value of
> sendm
that as well. And I don’t need the Postfix built sendmail in
/usr/bin as I have Apple’s built-in Postfix configured to write to the same
queue files so it works fine anyway.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
if you installed
it in the non-local part of /usr but you should not be able to install Postfix
there unless you turned off SIP (System Integrity Protection).
The various problems you are having suggest something very non-standard about
your configuration.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
een
away from VMS for 25 years or so but it wouldn’t surprise me if that old name
still lives on in the current version.
— Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
(protocol)
> behavior and reputation, plus a static allow/deny list that is
> typically populated with information from major provider SPF records.
Unfortunately, I believe the poster’s question was a political correctness
question, not a technical question.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
be
%Y%m%d-%H%M%S.
And as I said, it’s technically not a bug because it works as documented but as
documented and as works is not what one would reasonably expect.
I’m running Postfix 3.5.1.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On May 9, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Larry Stone wr
g/MAILLOG_README.html (so technically not a bug since it
works as documented but not as one would expect).
Easy fix with an override in main.cf
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
imate messages.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Larry Stone:
>> Yep. Sadly, the mail provider I use for personal email had a spam
>> check to consider dates 2020 and later to be ?from the future? and
>> rejected mail. It took a few hours for them to
them to fix it on 1/1, meanwhile, considerable mail was
lost. Check your various spam checking processes.
As my mail provider has told me they updated it to 2030, I now have a reminder
set on my computer for 1-Dec-2029 to remind them to update it (should I still
be using them 10 years from now).
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com <mailto:lston...@stonejongleux.com>
.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> On 7/08/19 2:02 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
>> I use MacOS Mail and for receiving, I just have “Automatically manage
>> connection settings” checked and it just works (but that’s really a
but make sure you didn’t make a typo in the server
name.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
8 albion postfix/postfix-script[71490]: refreshing the Postfix
mail system
Jan 23 14:09:28 albion postfix/master[71397]: reload -- version
3.4-20190121-nonprod, configuration /usr/local/etc/postfix
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
Disregard. Reposted in the proper topic.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 23, 2019, at 10:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> I noticed what appears to be a cosmetic problem: log entries from master are
> being time-stamped with the time they were last started
as 43l9l92Zkzz16xT)
Jan 23 07:30:10 albion postfix/qmgr[61559]: C81A61033C87: removed
^^^ time of first activity above
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 22, 2019, at 6:20 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:0
rst activity above
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 19, 2019, at 3:10 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
>
>>>>>> "Wietse" == Wietse Venema writes:
>
> Wietse> John Stoffel:
>>>>>>>> "Wietse" == Wiets
elope
> sender @mydomain.com unless the client has authenticated via port 465 or 587:
Not so typical IMHO. And probably unneeded to solve the OP’s problem. Once we
see what he really had in smtp_relay_restrictions, we are likely to find a
simple issue there that he can easily fix.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
utgoing only) was properly logged. Have not
tested anything yet involving log rotation. Unlike James Brown and his
Unsupported Berkeley DB version, I do not have Berkeley DB on my system (unless
a version comes with MacOS), do not use mySQL, and do not have anything from
Homebrew on the system
system processes and monitoring
jobs), I’ll be happy to do some testing when you have it ready.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
of issues I never thought
about and as a result, my knowledge of the subject has been greatly expanded.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 9, 2019, at 9:48 PM, James Brown wrote:
>
>> On 10 Jan 2019, at 2:01 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
>>
>> Is this a recent build of Dovecot or was it built on an older version of
>> MacOS before the logging changes? If the former, ask on the
pile on old Mac and
> transfer.
Not as far as any of us know. It’s been discussed here before and no solution
has been found.
— Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
four directories you mentioned the same.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
t everyone else has
of Apple Mail does not do that. I’ve sent a test message to myself with HTML
included and there was no conversion of links. And this message was sent with
Apple Mail.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
s email was sent by Apple Mail and I don’t believe you’ll see
anything weird done to it.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
plies should be interleaved with
the lines you are replying to.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> James.
>
>> On 8 Nov 2018, at 6:57 pm, Robert Chalmers wrote:
>>
>> I have been asked how I turn on /var/log/mail.log for postfix on a Mac
>> running Mo
bviously not a long-term viable solution. Not concerned about
having the latest and greatest Postfix since it’s not externally accessible.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.g. relaying outbound mail
through an upstream server) requires Cyrus.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
logging would be to build
your own log handler. But that’s something that is way beyond me.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Nov 6, 2017, at 12:10 PM, James Reynolds <reyno...@biology.utah.edu> wrote:
>
> Larry,
> Can you explain what you mean by the current Ap
is the latest 3.2.3. However, due to the current Apple logging
system, I build (make) Postfix on an older system running the final version of
Mavericks (10.9.5) and then copy the build directory to the target system to
run make upgrade.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Oct
it does not attempt to document SMTP
and assumes the reader has a basic understanding of SMTP. Similarly, your car’s
owner’s manual documents your car; it does not teach you how to drive and
Word’s documentation documents Word and does not teach you how to write.
-- Larry Stone
Sent from my iPad
tag, then you
need to tell us what else is handling the email before it makes it to your
mailbox.
Also, reply on list, not directly to me. Future emails sent directly to me will
be ignored.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 6:03 AM, Zalezny Niezale
, the [MASSMAIL] tag is a symptom of some other problem adding the
undesired (to you at least) tag. Fix the problem, not the symptom.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:32 AM, Zalezny Niezalezny
> <zalezny.niezale...@gmail.com> wr
lcome message will help. As it says
there:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
That includes a list of what is required.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 7:36 AM, paul.greene.va <paul.greene...@verizon.net>
>
> On Feb 18, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Larry Stone <lston...@stonejongleux.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> If you have a pre-Sierra MacOS/X machine, perhaps building
> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:37:27AM -1000, Larry Stone wrote:
>
>> Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue?
>
> No. Insufficient time to figure out the i
ot;/usr/local/etc/postfix\"\
-DDEF_DAEMON_DIR=\"/usr/local/libexec/postfix\"\
-DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/local/include' \
AUXLIBS='-L/usr/local/lib -lpcre -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto \
-L/usr/local/lib -lsasl2’
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 6:51
configuration changes (with Postfix, I know what the configuration does and I
feel confident making changes; with the others, I have a configuration that
meets my needs but I’m not quite sure why and I don’t dare even breathe on it
out of a fear it will horribly break if I do).
--
Larry Stone
lston
es the future problems as well.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
06:18:18.094145-0600 localhost backupd[13915]: (TimeMachine)
[com.apple.TimeMachine.TMLogInfo] Backup completed successfully.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Robert Chalmers <racu...@icloud.com> wrot
ts it. But the latter example would also apply to voice communications
in the amateur bands so since you can't be sure that even voice is unencrypted,
I guess they aren't legal either.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
il disable
• Restart OS X, your Mac should then restart as normal with SIP disabled,
This is a permanent setting so once done would never need to be done again. But
if you want to toggle it on and off as needed, to turn it on, just say “csrutil
enable” instead.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
, aliases are created
(automatically by Mailman) to pipe the Mailman addresses to the proper Mailman
program. Postfix transports are not involved (however, there are a lot of
non-standard Mailman distributions out there). It appears the OP is doing
something non-standard.
--
Larry Stone
lston
rse. When I reached a point where I wanted to integrate
other things like Amavis, DKIM signing, and other filters, it was time to move
away from what his product set up.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ect mixing the two is not a good idea.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
of port 465 was deliberately not included in the above as it does not
seem to be part of the OPs issue.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
\
-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\dovecot\\
-DDEF_COMMAND_DIR=\/usr/local/sbin\\
-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\/usr/local/etc/postfix\\
-DDEF_DAEMON_DIR=\/usr/local/libexec/postfix\\
-DHAS_PCRE -I/usr/local/include' \
AUXLIBS='-L/usr/local/lib -lpcre -lssl -lcrypto’
--
Larry
have to work around the problem again when the next
change is made.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
done the build (not installed yet) but that is the same command I used for
building my currently running 2.11.1.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
You should no longer need to specify -lresolv (though it won't
fix this problem), and should never have needed to specify -arch x86_64?.
Hmmm
and then bounce” behavior you seem to have,
you have changed something. But since you have provided no information on your
configuration, anything further is merely guessing.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
. The
backscatter problem is a symptom of the bigger problem of your users
abusing your server. Fix the real problem, not the symptom.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
or
whatever Mail Delivery Agent you’re using is not configured to deliver it there.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
are helpful as
well.
However, as I stated earlier, this is probably not a Postfix issues.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Apple Developer tools
installed but only two have my local install of PCRE in /usr/local on them).
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
of an IMAP or POP
server such as Dovecot, not Postfix. Besides that, mynetworks defines
trusted IP addresses, not domains.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
in learning at this point
than actually getting it running. But pointing me in the right direction will
be appreciated.
It may be simpler to upgrade your system.
AFAIK, Apple does not have a later version of OpenSSL available.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com
On May 11, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 06:00:38PM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
On the test system, trying to force the new version of OpenSSL (1.0.1g), I
used:
make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
CCARGS='-DUSE_TLS /usr/local
On May 11, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:57:29PM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
The above syntax is incorrect. Try
... CCARGS='
-DUSE_TLS -I/usr/local/ssl/include
-DUSE_SASL_AUTH
-DDEF_COMMAND_DIR=\/usr/local
this past weekend) has workarounds for the
From and Reply-To piece of this. And despite your claim that you told
Mailman to send to port 587 instead (no proof provided), you must not have
done what you thought you did. But the Mailman list is the place for what
you need.
-- Larry Stone
lston
than 29217 so even before getting to the
last three delay components, it's obviously bogus).
As Wietse said, you've wasted our time. And if you don't know who Wietse
is, I suggest you do a search on his name before posting here again.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html for more information.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
provided.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
, the DSL provider will change
the reverse DNS but not always. It’s the dynamic address hostnames you want to
block.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
not mindreaders and if you do not provide the information requested, we
can't tell you what you did wrong.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
, don't just do what we suggest; make
sure you understand it and that it is doing what YOU want.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
in question is actually set to
use 587 only. IIRC, that is not the default.
-- Larry Stone
Sent from my iPhone
, that is not the default.
-- Larry Stone
Sent from my iPhone
OK, so perhaps just refusing AUTH on port 25 will solve the problem. I've
set the Server Port in Outgoing mail settings on iPhone to 587, so I don't
really understand what's going on here...
I doubt it. Based on what you previously
4.3.5 Server configuration error
permit_sasl_auth permit_sasl_authenticated
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
than as
a decimal point.
No doubt no matter what you do, some people will get confused. So stick with
what we have which fits with much other software.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
is in a
different location than the previous version.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.
Thanks. I had a feeling that was the answer.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
On Apr 30, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 30.04.2013 21:20, schrieb Larry Stone:
FWIW, I consider Lion (10.7) to be the last version of OS X for which the
Apple provided Postfix is usable. For
Mountain Lion (10.8), they changed a lot of the default
the router to the alternate IP
address (thereby stopping legitimate outside mail from getting in), install in
production, test, and if all seems OK, switch back to the regular IP address.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
of Linux since it's been a cool buzz-word but have no idea what Unix is.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
on the part of site3.
Your example says m...@site3.com so I assume you are the site3 recipient. Are
you running some sort of script on the received message that might be doing
this? Do you control the site3 SMTP server or are you just a user there?
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http
and would not have
your initial statement of the problem.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
from a content filter with 3 recipients.
Seeing your master.cf might help too. But it's most likely the content
filter listening to port 10026.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
than SquirrelMail)
required.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
/local (which Apple so far does not touch) so that I am
not at the whim of their changes.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
, not main.cf contents (in other words, the
configuration postfix is actually using, not the one you think it is
using).
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
mean unsubscribe.
As for the second question, receiving your own post back does an adequate job
of acknowledging the post. Unless, of course, you mean something different when
you say post acknowledgements.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
.
Information about the list including a subscription sign-up form can be
found at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users/
There are lots of Mailman users there who have it integrated with Postfix
so you should be able to get your questions answered there.
-- Larry Stone
lston
is a registered trademark for a
competing mailing list server and is not a generic term for any mailing list
server.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
to do with them.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
the
definition of BCC.
(perhaps part of the problem is younger folk, rarely if ever exposed to
traditional office paper communications, are not familiar with why the
term is carbon copy, when blind carbon copies were used, and perhaps
have never even seen carbon paper)
-- Larry Stone
lston
or somehow
make postfix to authenticate the users telneting the server directly?
No. To an SMTP server such as Postfix, there is no difference between an SMTP
client and a Telnet client that is talking to it. SMTP clients essentially use
the Telnet protocol to talk to an SMTP server.
--
Larry
the OP
should probably just remove check_relay_domains from his configuration.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/
the top of my head, as a former New Jersey, USA resident, there are three
counties ending in sex: Essex, Middlesex, and Sussex; lots more elsewhere in
the world). Your check will reject legitimate mail that contains the names of
these places.
--
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http
reject when attempting to send
from outside your network to outside your network. Note that
permit_sasl_authenticated must be ahead of reject_unauth_destination.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
of
what they were trying to do. To the extent it makes you actually
understand SMTP and Postfix better, it's probably good not to be too
specific.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
that a plus since it lets me add comments
and group things in a logical fashion.
-- Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
