]]
Sent: 22 November 2001 00:27
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] MS versus Linux
On 05:46 PM 11/21/2001 -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
Andrew Jenkins wrote:
On 07:29 PM 11/21/2001 +1000, robi artwork wrote:
Talking about Operating Systems !
To my knowledge -
Linux is a much
I managed 283days uptime on my Windows 2000 work station and
thats using
Protel, Word, Excel and numerous other application everyday
and just loging
off at night.
That sounds about right for Windows 2000.
The reboot came when I installed service pack 2, 114 days ago
and yesterday
I can't manage 2 hours on my win 2k box without BSOD
unless of course I don't touch it.
In fact just booting up the machine is hit and miss,
about 25% of the time it crashes before it finishes booting,
try and save something, crash, try to open a file, crash
try to type in a URL, crash.
I miss
PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] MS versus Linux
I managed 283days uptime on my Windows 2000 work station and
thats using
Protel, Word, Excel and numerous other application everyday
and just loging
off
, November 21, 2001 7:29 PM
Subject: [PEDA] MS versus Linux
Talking about Operating Systems !
To my knowledge -
Linux is a much-much faster and a lot-lot more stable Operating System as
any of Microsofts Op's will ever be.
Simply said - it's a much better Platform.
Talking to Protel about
I ( and I am sure many others here) would be more than willing to beta test
a Protel unix version. I can not see it being that hard to convert protel
over (apart from converting the database over to mysql from access) I know
it would be labour intensive, but I believe it would give them more
is essentially Delphi on Linux.
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: robi artwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:29 AM
Subject: [PEDA] MS versus Linux
Talking about
: Kathy Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] MS versus Linux
When Protel (or what ever they call themselves today) pestered me the
other
day about upgrading my 98SE license (probably cause I downloaded
At 07:29 PM 11/21/01 +1000, robi artwork wrote:
Well well well -
Maybe the time has come to ask Altium to get Protel running under Linux.
Given the way that Microsoft is going, I request that Altium pursue the
Linux system as an option. I'm aware that this may require substantial
effort, but
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Oh boy, a chance to stir the Windows/Linux pot!
But seriously:
We use both Linux and Windows 9X, 2K. Linux is used so far only as the LAN
server/gateway. All of the desktop work is done on Windows. Linux is a
great server OS, but still needs a lot of GUI
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Has any of the *nix users here tried protel under VMware ?? as I have been
I think you still need a copy of Windows to run Windows apps under VMware
when you run VMware hosted on Linux.
Yes, certainly. VMware just provides you with a virtual PC, with no
Robi,
I used to use Cadence on Unix for many years. 10 years later I still say
the older versions of Unix are better
than all the crap out today, period. These overinflated operating systems
of today, from my viewpoint, are
about money and not service for the customers. Having had the benefit
Andrew Jenkins wrote:
On 07:29 PM 11/21/2001 +1000, robi artwork wrote:
Talking about Operating Systems !
To my knowledge -
Linux is a much-much faster and a lot-lot more stable Operating System as any of
Microsofts Op's will ever be.
Dear Robi Artwork, please send me some of what
On 09:13 PM 11/21/2001 +1000, Don Ingram wrote:
We vowed to stick with M$ to save having to deal with 'yet more different
software' but since our experience with dealing with Win2K server and M$'s
new direction in licensing we decided to have a look at Linux.
I think that readers may be confused
21 matches
Mail list logo
