Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Edi Im Hof
At 16:22 22.02.02 -0500, you wrote: At 01:36 PM 2/22/2002 -0500, Paul Hutchinson wrote: It seems to be getting difficult to buy Windows 2000. Computer Gate only sells it with hardrive/motherboard/CPU orders, but a search did turn up active auctions. My favorite vendor, PC Connection, has

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote: As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000. Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license, yes, of course it would be legal. But if it is not specifically allowed, there would

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Dennis Saputelli
buycheapsoftware.com has it $147 Dennis Saputelli Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote: As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000. Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license,

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Greg . North

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Andrew Jenkins
On 01:40 PM 2/25/2002 -0500, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote: As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000. Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license, yes, of course it would be

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Brian Guralnick
] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:00 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems | At 16:22 22.02.02 -0500, you wrote: | At 01:36 PM 2/22/2002 -0500, Paul Hutchinson wrote: | It seems to be getting difficult to buy Windows 2000. Computer Gate only

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-25 Thread Jacob Ellis
: Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote: As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000. Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license, yes, of course it would be legal

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-22 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:26 PM 2/21/2002 -0800, Mike Ingle wrote: Are you really running w95? I suppose you may have noticed that w2k is the currently preferred base OS for PROTEL. Although who can take a few days off to reintall eberything and get it working. It seems to be getting difficult to buy Windows

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-22 Thread Paul Hutchinson
It seems to be getting difficult to buy Windows 2000. Computer Gate only sells it with hardrive/motherboard/CPU orders, but a search did turn up active auctions. My favorite vendor, PC Connection, has it in stock. Full Version:

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Grewell, Mel - TNTD- AMPS
Bob, Actually that program only runs when your processor is idle, and therefore doesn't impact Protel. However just in case you aren't aware of what the program is, or recently downloaded it you should check the following url- http://www.distributed.net/ . It appears some bad copies are

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:18 PM 21/02/2002 -0500, Bob Jones said: DNETC.EXE Is a trojan according to a quick search on google. I think you will probably want to do your own research on how to get rid of it. The Symantec AV and the McAfee AV sites would be good starting points. Ian

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Mike Ingle
Are you really running w95? I suppose you may have noticed that w2k is the currently preferred base OS for PROTEL. Although who can take a few days off to reintall eberything and get it working. Mike -Original Message- From: Bob Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Tim Hutcheson
Bob, This looks like a part of one of the distributed computing apps like the Seti or United Device Cancer or Antrax project. Perhaps you had been a participant at one time in something like that? regards, Tim Hutcheson Institute for Human and Machine Cognition 40 S. Alcaniz St. Pensacola, FL

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Clive . Broome
So the end result is your comp still freezes on text move for 2 seconds on 0805 and 12 secs for SOP? Thats way unacceptable performance. In the table, the big jump is from DRC. Is it disabled using right click/options/preferences/online DRC (unchecked)? Are you using network licenses and

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Dennis Saputelli
yes W95 may not be the prob, but i would say it is time to move on, it may fix things by accident Dennis Saputelli Mike Ingle wrote: Are you really running w95? I suppose you may have noticed that w2k is the currently preferred base OS for PROTEL. Although who can take a few days off to

Re: [PEDA] results of performance problems

2002-02-21 Thread Rusty Garfield
At 05:11 PM 2/21/2002 -0500, you wrote: Bob if it is just these two footprints and not others in your libraries try deleting these two parts. They may be corrupted. I vaguely remember having this problem years ago. Delete the parts save and exit Protel. Reenter Protel and try to repair the