[protobuf] Issue 150 in protobuf: src/Makefile relies on $^ which is not understood by FreeBSD make.

2010-01-07 Thread protobuf
Status: Accepted Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 150 by ken...@google.com: src/Makefile relies on $^ which is not understood by FreeBSD make. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=150 FreeBSD's default make does not seem to understand

[protobuf] Re: Issue 150 in protobuf: src/Makefile relies on $^ which is not understood by FreeBSD make.

2010-01-07 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.3.0 Comment #1 on issue 150 by ken...@google.com: src/Makefile relies on $^ which is not understood by FreeBSD make. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=150 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

[protobuf] Issue 151 in protobuf: protobuf 2.3 's plugin not work on Cygwin 1.7.1

2010-01-10 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 151 by pop.atry: protobuf 2.3 's plugin not work on Cygwin 1.7.1 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=151 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Open cygwin. 2. cd protobuf-2.3.0 ./configure make 3. src

[protobuf] Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 152 by rktoomey: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 What steps will reproduce the problem

[protobuf] Re: Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 152 by rktoomey: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 I am using protobuf-java 2.2.0, defined in the parent pom dependencies for both project A and project B

[protobuf] Re: Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 152 by rktoomey: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 The problem is that AbstractProtocMojo.makeProtopathFromJars is constructing a non-viable Windows path

[protobuf] Re: Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Updates: Owner: gk5885 Comment #3 on issue 152 by ken...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

[protobuf] Re: Issue 151 in protobuf: protobuf 2.3 's plugin not work on Cygwin 1.7.1

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: CannotReproduce Comment #2 on issue 151 by ken...@google.com: protobuf 2.3 's plugin not work on Cygwin 1.7.1 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=151 I tried this with Cygwin 1.7.1 and did not see the problem you describe: $ cat /usr/bin/protoc-gen

[protobuf] Re: Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #4 on issue 152 by rktoomey: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 Confirmed working on Linux (Ubuntu 9.10), so this is a(n annoying) Windows-only bug. But it's a blocker

[protobuf] Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 153 by jordanbg: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 What steps will reproduce the problem? Importing from protoc's python output gives the following error

[protobuf] Re: Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 153 by jordanbg: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 I realize I left a cryptic and potentially unuseful error message, but I didn't take the time to isolate the problem. However, if it helps, this was with Python 2.6

[protobuf] Re: Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 153 by jordanbg: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 I don't think so, as this was a fresh install on a virgin machine. I installed protobuf, boost, and gsl for the first time. -- You received this message because you

[protobuf] Re: Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #4 on issue 153 by ken...@google.com: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 Well, descriptor.py clearly defines FileDescriptor: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/python/google/protobuf/descriptor .py#557 So I don't

[protobuf] Re: Issue 152 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException)

2010-01-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #5 on issue 152 by rktoomey: Maven Protoc Plugin fails when a jar file contains a .proto file (FileNotFoundException) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 The stupidest thing that could possibly work - edit AbstractProtocMojo.makeProtopathFromJars method to produce

[protobuf] Issue 154 in protobuf: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages.

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 154 by huas.su: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=154 The C++ class generated by protoc for a message doesn't implement an operator

[protobuf] Re: Issue 154 in protobuf: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages.

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #1 on issue 154 by ken...@google.com: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=154 I think you mean operator==(). We intentionally chose not to include comparison, as we find

[protobuf] Re: Issue 122 in protobuf: Two test failures on Windows

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #12 on issue 122 by ken...@google.com: Two test failures on Windows http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=122 That is, you need to specify the full path of the .proto file, which should start with some directory in the proto_path. C:\Software\protobuf-2.3.0\vsprojects

[protobuf] Re: Issue 122 in protobuf: Two test failures on Windows

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #13 on issue 122 by ken...@google.com: Two test failures on Windows http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=122 Err, remove the That is, from the start of that post. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

[protobuf] Re: Issue 154 in protobuf: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages.

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 154 by huas.su: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=154 Thanks for your comments. I think message1.SerializeAsString() == message2.SerializeAsString() is acceptable. -- You received this message because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 154 in protobuf: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages.

2010-01-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 154 by huas.su: Generate operator =() implementatoin for messages. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=154 Thanks for your comments. I think message1.SerializeAsString() == message2.SerializeAsString() is acceptable. -- You received this message because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 122 in protobuf: Two test failures on Windows

2010-01-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #14 on issue 122 by briford.wylie: Two test failures on Windows http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=122 Hi, thanks for the tip. Worked fine. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue

[protobuf] Issue 157 in protobuf: win32's subprocess.cc doesn't compile if UNICODE is defined.

2010-01-14 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 157 by n...@chromium.org: win32's subprocess.cc doesn't compile if UNICODE is defined. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=157 subprocess.cc doesn't compile if UNICODE was defined, because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 155 in protobuf: Compiler complains with 'error: extra qualification'

2010-01-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 155 by ken...@google.com: Compiler complains with 'error: extra qualification' http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=155 How strange. That never should have compiled, but it passed testing on MSVC, MinGW, and Cygwin (GCC 3.x

[protobuf] Re: Issue 159 in protobuf: 2.3.0 build fails under QNX fails

2010-01-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.3.1 Comment #1 on issue 159 by ken...@google.com: 2.3.0 build fails under QNX fails http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=159 Thanks, committed as revision 309. -- You received this message because you are listed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 156 in protobuf: extension_set.h needs GetMessage / GetMessageA / GetMessageW workaround

2010-01-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.3.1 Comment #1 on issue 156 by ken...@google.com: extension_set.h needs GetMessage / GetMessageA / GetMessageW workaround http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=156 Your revision 305 fixed this. Thanks! -- You received

[protobuf] Re: Issue 155 in protobuf: Compiler complains with 'error: extra qualification'

2010-01-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Labels: FixedIn-2.3.1 Comment #2 on issue 155 by ken...@google.com: Compiler complains with 'error: extra qualification' http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=155 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-01-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: CannotReproduce Comment #5 on issue 153 by ken...@google.com: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[protobuf] Issue 160 in protobuf: Linker errors when the project is statically linked with MFC in VS2008

2010-01-20 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 160 by gil.levy: Linker errors when the project is statically linked with MFC in VS2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=160 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.Create a proto sample

[protobuf] Re: Issue 160 in protobuf: Linker errors when the project is statically linked with MFC in VS2008

2010-01-20 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #1 on issue 160 by ken...@google.com: Linker errors when the project is statically linked with MFC in VS2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=160 This is not a protobuf bug, but some misconfiguration in your project

[protobuf] Issue 161 in protobuf: mvn install fails to compile the source code.

2010-01-21 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 161 by mohanmca: mvn install fails to compile the source code. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=161 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. mvn install itself fails during compilation 2. 3

[protobuf] Re: Issue 161 in protobuf: mvn install fails to compile the source code.

2010-01-22 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #1 on issue 161 by ken...@google.com: mvn install fails to compile the source code. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=161 It looks like you may have generated DescriptorProtos.java with protoc 2.2.0 instead of 2.3.0

[protobuf] Re: Issue 57 in protobuf: null values should be treated as no value

2010-01-27 Thread protobuf
Comment #38 on issue 57 by christophedehlinger: null values should be treated as no value http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57 Kenton, I'm in the process of migrating from JSON to Protobuf, and I must say I was very surprised and disappointed when I came across

[protobuf] Re: Issue 57 in protobuf: null values should be treated as no value

2010-01-27 Thread protobuf
Comment #39 on issue 57 by christophedehlinger: null values should be treated as no value http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57 D'oh ! The last block of code should read: ProtoPerson.Builder builder = ProtoPerson.Builder.newBuilder(); String eFirstName

[protobuf] Re: Issue 57 in protobuf: null values should be treated as no value

2010-01-27 Thread protobuf
Updates: Owner: ken...@google.com Comment #40 on issue 57 by ken...@google.com: null values should be treated as no value http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=57 OK, look: The vast majority of the people I talk to about this agree that the current behavior is correct

[protobuf] Issue 162 in protobuf: Add #include algorithm for std::swap

2010-02-01 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 162 by dstahlke: Add #include algorithm for std::swap http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=162 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Run cpplint.py --filter=-whitespace,-legal/copyright

[protobuf] Re: Issue 162 in protobuf: Add #include algorithm for std::swap

2010-02-01 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.3.1 Comment #1 on issue 162 by ken...@google.com: Add #include algorithm for std::swap http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=162 revision 314 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[protobuf] Issue 163 in protobuf: protoc cpp invalid #include links

2010-02-04 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 163 by tianhaozhang: protoc cpp invalid #include links http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=163 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create TestRoot message to importTestLeaf in ./src

[protobuf] Re: Issue 163 in protobuf: protoc cpp invalid #include links

2010-02-04 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #1 on issue 163 by ken...@google.com: protoc cpp invalid #include links http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=163 protoc generates includes relative to the top of your proto_path. Try: protoc --proto_path=./Test/Foo --cpp_out

[protobuf] Re: Issue 164 in protobuf: coded_stream.h needs limits.h to compile on Solaris 10 with GCC 4.3

2010-02-08 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: FixedIn-2.3.1 Comment #1 on issue 164 by ken...@google.com: coded_stream.h needs limits.h to compile on Solaris 10 with GCC 4.3 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=164 Revision 316. Thanks. -- You received this message because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-08 Thread protobuf
Comment #10 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 I think what's going on is: 1. easy_install is finding that egg at pypi.python.org is out of date (v2.0.3) as compared to the main download page (v2.3.0) and chooses

[protobuf] Re: Issue 158 in protobuf: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo

2010-02-08 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 158 by dmda...@gmail.com: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=158 A SNAPSHOT mvn option would be nice, too. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-09 Thread protobuf
Comment #11 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Could you try the following from protobuf-2.3.0/python: python setup.py bdist_egg upload Done. Did it work? How do I test it? I think it's possible

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-09 Thread protobuf
Comment #12 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Done. Did it work? How do I test it? Yes, it worked for Python 2.5 (which is the version you're using, presumably). It didn't work for other versions of Python

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-09 Thread protobuf
Comment #13 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Regarding testing, I would use virtualenv: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv It creates an isolated python environment which has setuptools preinstalled. -- You

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-09 Thread protobuf
Comment #14 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Done. It gave me an error because the bdist was already uploaded but I'm guessing that doesn't matter. It looks like the source dist is now listed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 158 in protobuf: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo

2010-02-10 Thread protobuf
Comment #4 on issue 158 by jarek.odzga: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=158 Any prospect on when 2.3.0 is available in maven repo? This should be fairly simple thing to do... -- You received this message because you are listed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 158 in protobuf: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo

2010-02-10 Thread protobuf
Comment #5 on issue 158 by jhuxhorn: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=158 This should really be included in the normal release procedure. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-12 Thread protobuf
Updates: Labels: -Component-Docs Comment #17 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 I have no idea how that label got added to my previous comment. -- You received this message because you are listed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #18 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Alright. What's the schedule for the next release? If there is one, that is. =) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-12 Thread protobuf
Comment #19 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 There's not a schedule. I'd imagine/hope it would happen within the next couple months, but can't guarantee anything. I wish there were a way to test

[protobuf] Re: Issue 165 in protobuf: can not link for mips architecture

2010-02-16 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Accepted Owner: ken...@google.com Comment #4 on issue 165 by ken...@google.com: can not link for mips architecture http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=165 I believe we should try to detect this problem in stl_hash.m4, and fall back

[protobuf] Re: Issue 83 in protobuf: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008

2010-02-17 Thread protobuf
Comment #8 on issue 83 by halostatue: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83 Visual Studio cannot disable warnings for third-party headers. I'm not sure that disabling these warnings in stubs/common.h

[protobuf] Re: Issue 83 in protobuf: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008

2010-02-17 Thread protobuf
Comment #9 on issue 83 by halostatue: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83 Visual Studio cannot disable warnings for third-party headers. I'm not sure that disabling these warnings in stubs/common.h

[protobuf] Re: Issue 165 in protobuf: can not link for mips architecture

2010-02-17 Thread protobuf
Comment #5 on issue 165 by ph.hu...@gmx.com: can not link for mips architecture http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=165 Hi, if you can provide me with any hint to solve or avoid the problem by modifying your source, I'd be very happy to try it. After two days trying

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-18 Thread protobuf
Comment #20 on issue 66 by spaans: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 you could release a 2.3.1 specifically to fix this issue - I've had to add a 2.5 and a 2.6 egg to our svn tree to prevent buildout from fetching the (wrong) zipfile

[protobuf] Re: Issue 165 in protobuf: can not link for mips architecture

2010-02-18 Thread protobuf
Comment #6 on issue 165 by ken...@google.com: can not link for mips architecture http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=165 As I said before, after running configure, just edit config.h (in the root directory of the package) and change the hash-related parts to use hash_map

[protobuf] Re: Issue 165 in protobuf: can not link for mips architecture

2010-02-19 Thread protobuf
Comment #8 on issue 165 by ph.hu...@gmx.com: can not link for mips architecture http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=165 thanks a lot. After manually editing the config.h file according your recommendation, it seams to work! here is, what I changed in the config.h after

[protobuf] Re: Issue 115 in protobuf: JDK 1.6- Incompatibility

2010-02-19 Thread protobuf
Comment #14 on issue 115 by aleh.veraskouski: JDK 1.6- Incompatibility http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=115 guys, this thread saved a lot of time for me. attaching the file for the followers - the most recent protobuf 2.3.0 compiled with Sun's javac 1.6.0_16 Attachments

[protobuf] Re: Issue 134 in protobuf: Build on Solaris with the native STL

2010-02-20 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 134 by blizin...@google.com: Build on Solaris with the native STL http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=134 The min() and max() problem can be solved by adding the following include: {{{ #include sys/ddi.h }}} -- You received this message because you

[protobuf] Issue 166 in protobuf: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12

2010-02-21 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 166 by maciej.blizinski: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=166 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Try to build

[protobuf] Issue 167 in protobuf: Python Docs: HasField lacking documentation

2010-02-22 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 167 by danhomerick: Python Docs: HasField lacking documentation http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=167 HasField raises ValueError rather than returning False when msg type lacks the requested

[protobuf] Re: Issue 167 in protobuf: Python Docs: HasField lacking documentation

2010-02-22 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #1 on issue 167 by ken...@google.com: Python Docs: HasField lacking documentation http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=167 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

[protobuf] Re: Issue 166 in protobuf: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12

2010-02-22 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 166 by ken...@google.com: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=166 If you change make_pair(name, value) to make_pairstd::string,const FileDescriptorProto*(name, value), does it work

[protobuf] Re: Issue 134 in protobuf: Build on Solaris with the native STL

2010-02-22 Thread protobuf
Comment #5 on issue 134 by ken...@google.com: Build on Solaris with the native STL http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=134 If someone has actually tested this on the platform in question and confirmed that it worked (tests pass), send me a patch. -- You received

[protobuf] Re: Issue 158 in protobuf: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo

2010-02-23 Thread protobuf
Comment #7 on issue 158 by jasonab: Push 2.3.0 maven artifact to repo http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=158 The artifact is now in the maven central repository, although not in the Google repository. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

[protobuf] Re: Issue 83 in protobuf: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008

2010-02-23 Thread protobuf
Comment #12 on issue 83 by ken...@google.com: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83 Yikes, adding #pragmas all over like that is pretty ugly. What is the proper way to prevent these warnings in MSVC

[protobuf] Re: Issue 83 in protobuf: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008

2010-02-23 Thread protobuf
Comment #13 on issue 83 by halostatue: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83 Yeah, it's a little ugly, but it's consistent with what I've seen in gtest. The problem with the truncating_cast as you've

[protobuf] Re: Issue 83 in protobuf: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008

2010-02-24 Thread protobuf
Comment #14 on issue 83 by temporal: protobuf does not compile cleanly in 64-bit mode in Visual Studio 2008 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=83 The problem with the truncating_cast as you've specified is that both warning 4244 and 4267 are reported; So disable both

[protobuf] Issue 168 in protobuf: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd()

2010-02-25 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 168 by kaushik.ramajayam: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd() http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=168 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Write

[protobuf] Re: Issue 168 in protobuf: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd()

2010-02-25 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 168 by kaushik.ramajayam: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd() http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=168 Oops, my bad... I was using the wrong jar file (ver. 2.0.3). This isn't a bug. -- You received this message

[protobuf] Re: Issue 66 in protobuf: cannot install using easy_install

2010-02-25 Thread protobuf
Comment #21 on issue 66 by alexei.dvoretskii: cannot install using easy_install http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66 Our python2.6 installation on windows lives in W:\Python\Python26 and I was able to install the egg into W:\Python\Python26\Lib\site-packages\protobuf

[protobuf] Re: Issue 168 in protobuf: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd()

2010-02-25 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #2 on issue 168 by ken...@google.com: Class com.google.protobuf.CodedInputStream has no method named isAtEnd() http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=168 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

[protobuf] Re: Issue 149 in protobuf: maven-protoc-plugin fails during multi-project compile

2010-02-26 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 149 by damian.ryan: maven-protoc-plugin fails during multi-project compile http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=149 I have encountered exactly the same issue having just converted a set of previously separate project builds into multi-module maven build

[protobuf] Re: Issue 169 in protobuf: protoc will not build from a path that contains spaces on OS X 10.6

2010-02-26 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 169 by ken...@google.com: protoc will not build from a path that contains spaces on OS X 10.6 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=169 This appears to be a problem with libtool, one of the tools used in building

[protobuf] Re: Issue 166 in protobuf: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12

2010-02-28 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 166 by maciej.blizinski: by_symbol_.insert(iter, make_pair(name, value)); fails with Sun Studio 12 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=166 I worked around the issue by using an alternative STL implementation. This page has something that might

[protobuf] Re: Issue 170 in protobuf: Can't compile proto file using 'extend' feature

2010-03-03 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 170 by hellwolf.misty: Can't compile proto file using 'extend' feature http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=170 Ok, I figured it out... I should put an ; after import ..., and put -I /path/to/proto/include/dir -I. in the command line. -- You received

[protobuf] Re: Issue 170 in protobuf: Can't compile proto file using 'extend' feature

2010-03-03 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Comment #2 on issue 170 by temporal: Can't compile proto file using 'extend' feature http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=170 Glad you figured it out. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[protobuf] Issue 171 in protobuf: Reference to DescriptorProtos can't be resolved.

2010-03-04 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 171 by ContextWeb.adx: Reference to DescriptorProtos can't be resolved. http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=171 Import maven project in Eclipse. import com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos

[protobuf] Re: Issue 134 in protobuf: Build on Solaris with the native STL

2010-03-05 Thread protobuf
Comment #6 on issue 134 by maciej.blizinski: Build on Solaris with the native STL http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=134 I got it to build and all tests to pass. Here's the set of patches that were used to build it on Solaris 8 for OpenCSW. https

[protobuf] Issue 172 in protobuf: 2.3.0 fails to compile with -Wall -Wextra -Werror

2010-03-08 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 172 by exeonical: 2.3.0 fails to compile with -Wall -Wextra -Werror http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=172 My system: Ubuntu 9.04 gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) Errors: include

[protobuf] Issue 173 in protobuf: Statically linking to libprotobuf.a on QNX 6.4.1 fails, segmentation fault

2010-03-09 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 173 by rajesh.b...@abbott.com: Statically linking to libprotobuf.a on QNX 6.4.1 fails, segmentation fault http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=173 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Write

[protobuf] Re: Issue 172 in protobuf: 2.3.0 fails to compile with -Wall -Wextra -Werror

2010-03-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 172 by exeonical: 2.3.0 fails to compile with -Wall -Wextra -Werror http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=172 I understand. Just thought i let you know about these errors. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[protobuf] Re: Issue 126 in protobuf: corrupted protobuf-java-2.2.0.jar in maven repository

2010-03-14 Thread protobuf
Comment #10 on issue 126 by noam.wolf: corrupted protobuf-java-2.2.0.jar in maven repository http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=126 There still seems to be a problem with the checksums, can someone fix this? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

[protobuf] Issue 174 in protobuf: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false

2010-03-20 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 174 by t.broyer: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=174 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create

[protobuf] Re: Issue 153 in protobuf: 2.3 Python code not importing

2010-03-21 Thread protobuf
Comment #7 on issue 153 by jordanbg: 2.3 Python code not importing http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=153 Yes, that was the problem that I had. Reinstalling the python library fixed the problem. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

[protobuf] Re: Issue 174 in protobuf: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false

2010-03-22 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #1 on issue 174 by ken...@google.com: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=174 Yep, this is an artifact of lite mode having been implemented before

[protobuf] Issue 176 in protobuf: Unresolved Linking errors in the .obj files create by Protobuf

2010-03-29 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 176 by jharr100: Unresolved Linking errors in the .obj files create by Protobuf http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=176 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Installing everything I am

[protobuf] Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-06 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 177 by othy74: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. I use protoc (--cpp_out=) then build my simple cpp

[protobuf] Re: Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-06 Thread protobuf
Comment #1 on issue 177 by jas...@google.com: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 It sounds like you aren't linking against libprotobuf when compiling the generated code from your protoc command. Have you followed

[protobuf] Re: Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-06 Thread protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 177 by othy74: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 I was linking against libprotobuf-lite. Linking libprotobuf does indeed fix the runtime issue. Thanks! But now it's huge. My binary used to be 23 KB

[protobuf] Re: Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-06 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 177 by jas...@google.com: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 If you want to use the lite runtime, you need to make sure that your .proto file includes option optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME; Otherwise

[protobuf] Re: Issue 101 in protobuf: Compiling Protocol Buffer (64) using gcc in Sun 9 (libgcc_s.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32)

2010-04-06 Thread protobuf
Comment #4 on issue 101 by fnjordy: Compiling Protocol Buffer (64) using gcc in Sun 9 (libgcc_s.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32) http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=101 Affects Solaris 10/SPARC with GCC installed from sunfreeware.com The extra GCC package is required because

[protobuf] Re: Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-07 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WorkingAsIntended Owner: jas...@google.com Comment #5 on issue 177 by jas...@google.com: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

[protobuf] Issue 179 in protobuf: Visual C++ error C1091 when compiling protoc generated code with over 64k descriptor

2010-04-08 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 179 by iiro.hietala: Visual C++ error C1091 when compiling protoc generated code with over 64k descriptor http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=179 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1

[protobuf] Re: Issue 179 in protobuf: Visual C++ error C1091 when compiling protoc generated code with over 64k descriptor

2010-04-08 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #1 on issue 179 by ken...@google.com: Visual C++ error C1091 when compiling protoc generated code with over 64k descriptor http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=179 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

[protobuf] Re: Issue 177 in protobuf: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-04-08 Thread protobuf
Comment #7 on issue 177 by othy74: undefined symbol in shared lib on Ubuntu 10.04 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=177 My binary after optimize_for LITE = 450 KB. And after strip --strip-debug = 194 KB. I'm dynamically linking. But best of all: it's moving my objects over

[protobuf] Re: Issue 103 in protobuf: Protobuf 2.1.0 missing some sort of pthread linking?

2010-04-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Accepted Owner: ken...@google.com Comment #7 on issue 103 by ken...@google.com: Protobuf 2.1.0 missing some sort of pthread linking? http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=103 OK, that sounds promising. However, I'm having trouble finding

[protobuf] Re: Issue 149 in protobuf: maven-protoc-plugin fails during multi-project compile

2010-04-19 Thread protobuf
Comment #3 on issue 149 by google@freakmaster.com: maven-protoc-plugin fails during multi-project compile http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=149 I've fixed this issue for our project with the attached modification to AbstractProtocMojo.java Attachments

[protobuf] Re: Issue 174 in protobuf: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false

2010-04-19 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 174 by ken...@google.com: RFE: Allow service defs in optimize_for=LITE_RUNTIME if *_generic_service = false http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=174 Revision 326. -- You received this message because you are listed

[protobuf] Issue 180 in protobuf: Compiler warning for negating a uint64 in compiler/parser.cc:723

2010-04-22 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 180 by jam...@chromium.org: Compiler warning for negating a uint64 in compiler/parser.cc:723 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=180 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/src

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >