subject:"\[Proto\-Scripty\] Re\: $$"

Thanks for your replies. I will look into them, though I have tried to get 
multiple to work - without success. I was wondering if you had read my post 
on stackoverflow? Maybe you could see if there was a different solution to 
my little issue, it's driving me mad!

Den onsdag den 23. januar 2013 13.48.43 UTC+1 skrev Köd:

 Hi guys
 *
 To get a full view of my problem, please read: 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14478903/script-aculo-us-toggle-appear-on-multiple-divs
 *_

 *I have a simple question to ask you:*
 Is it possible to use effect.opacity as a toggle effect?

 The reason why I'm asking this is because when using effect.opacity the 
 assigned function can be spammed, hence making the div appear/fade over and 
 over. I was thinking that it might would be possible to do so by changing 
 something in the scriptaculous.js or effects.js file.


 If this is not possible, I would like to ask how you can use Effect.Toggle 
 (appear) on multiple div's within an a href containing an onclick. An 
 example:

 lia href=# onclick=Effect.toggle('DIV1, DIV2, DIV3', 'appear'); return 
 false;/a


 Thanks.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/4HT0A3QJPDYJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Toggle opacity

Thanks for the quick replies guys, I really appreciate it, +1 for that!

I was just wondering if you have read my post on stackoverflow? You might 
have a different way of handling this problem.

Anyway, I tried to use the Effect.multiple for Appear, without any luck. I 
guess I tried it completely wrong.. since I did something in the lines of:

a href=# 
onclick=Effect.multiple(['portfolioDiv','slideDiv'],function(el){Effect.toggle(el,'appear');});/a



Den onsdag den 23. januar 2013 13.48.43 UTC+1 skrev Köd:

 Hi guys
 *
 To get a full view of my problem, please read: 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14478903/script-aculo-us-toggle-appear-on-multiple-divs
 *_

 *I have a simple question to ask you:*
 Is it possible to use effect.opacity as a toggle effect?

 The reason why I'm asking this is because when using effect.opacity the 
 assigned function can be spammed, hence making the div appear/fade over and 
 over. I was thinking that it might would be possible to do so by changing 
 something in the scriptaculous.js or effects.js file.


 If this is not possible, I would like to ask how you can use Effect.Toggle 
 (appear) on multiple div's within an a href containing an onclick. An 
 example:

 lia href=# onclick=Effect.toggle('DIV1, DIV2, DIV3', 'appear'); return 
 false;/a


 Thanks.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/4MbUaIo5pyoJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Toggle opacity

Guys!

It works! I don't know what was wrong with my code before - but I made the 
Effect.Multiple work, thanks for your guidance! Weee, now I can continue 
being happy :D

Den onsdag den 23. januar 2013 13.48.43 UTC+1 skrev Köd:

 Hi guys
 *
 To get a full view of my problem, please read: 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14478903/script-aculo-us-toggle-appear-on-multiple-divs
 *_

 *I have a simple question to ask you:*
 Is it possible to use effect.opacity as a toggle effect?

 The reason why I'm asking this is because when using effect.opacity the 
 assigned function can be spammed, hence making the div appear/fade over and 
 over. I was thinking that it might would be possible to do so by changing 
 something in the scriptaculous.js or effects.js file.


 If this is not possible, I would like to ask how you can use Effect.Toggle 
 (appear) on multiple div's within an a href containing an onclick. An 
 example:

 lia href=# onclick=Effect.toggle('DIV1, DIV2, DIV3', 'appear'); return 
 false;/a


 Thanks.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/QXlygE0x3SIJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Toggle opacity

I did the following:

a href=# 
onclick=Effect.multiple(['portfolioDiv','slideDiv'],function(el){Effect.toggle(el,'appear');});

both of my divs had the obvious style=display:none

Using the same code to close them, since it's a toggle.

Den onsdag den 23. januar 2013 13.48.43 UTC+1 skrev Köd:

 Hi guys
 *
 To get a full view of my problem, please read: 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14478903/script-aculo-us-toggle-appear-on-multiple-divs
 *_

 *I have a simple question to ask you:*
 Is it possible to use effect.opacity as a toggle effect?

 The reason why I'm asking this is because when using effect.opacity the 
 assigned function can be spammed, hence making the div appear/fade over and 
 over. I was thinking that it might would be possible to do so by changing 
 something in the scriptaculous.js or effects.js file.


 If this is not possible, I would like to ask how you can use Effect.Toggle 
 (appear) on multiple div's within an a href containing an onclick. An 
 example:

 lia href=# onclick=Effect.toggle('DIV1, DIV2, DIV3', 'appear'); return 
 false;/a


 Thanks.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/c-F-3vlBWAsJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Object doesn't support property or method but then kinda works...

2013-01-17 Thread Phil Petree

Hi Greg!

Thanks for looking at this...

Turns out that if I remove the submit handler from the wizard class and
stop trapping the submit button it works just fine...

Not sure why this oddity is but it is and it works...

P~

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, greg i...@wildanimaltracks.com wrote:

 Off the top of my head, I think the target of your form should be the id
 of the iframe.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/sJgH4TRvAu8J.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Object doesn't support property or method but then kinda works...

2013-01-16 Thread greg

Off the top of my head, I think the target of your form should be the id of 
the iframe.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/sJgH4TRvAu8J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Re: Prototype itself throws errors in IE7

2013-01-16 Thread souprgenious

Thanks Lukas!  I somehow did the same thing and your post saved me pulling 
my hair out.  I am not sure how I included it twice but I did.

On Monday, August 29, 2011 3:37:52 AM UTC-4, Luke wrote:

 Ok, thank you guys but the problem was something different. It's almost 
 emberassing ^^. I simply included prototype.js twice. While every normal 
 Browser doesn't care, IE7 throws the above mentioned errors. Thanks though 
 for your responses and sorry for having wasted your time ;)

 Lukas


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/kAa-HnMJ9FkJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: event on leaving page

2013-01-10 Thread sreekala . a

I tried this code before window close.But again i get a pop up like  This 
page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have 
entered may not be saved.Two pop-ups are not needed.
window.onbeforeunload = function() {
var r=confirm(Are you sure you want to navigate away?);
if (r==false)
  {
 return false;
  }
 
 }



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/o0lXyGlNh4cJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-31 Thread Jason Westbrook

I was able to dig this one out of archive.org and I rewrote it a bit -
added a jsfiddle so that people can play with it etc


https://github.com/jwestbrook/Prototype.3DImageReflection


Just look at all of my github repos - they are all PrototypeJS libraries



Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amen... that would definately be a good move!  There are a number of
 things on scripteka that are dead and gone (broken links)


 On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote:


 I'm actually planning on taking whatever is still available on scripteka
 and rehosting it on github so that others can find it, see examples of it
 working, post issues and comment on the scripts

 Good idea! Do you have something to show already? Examples and issue
 tracking sounds good.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OvY44Z4adecJ.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX Tabs Widget

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Petree

Victor,

Thanks for the links... I'd already seen control.tabs and it doesn't appear
to support ajax (if it does its not documented and the api makes no
reference to it).

The one on sourceforge appears to be a fork of the control.tabs and also I
do see references to ajax in the source, it has no documentation or
examples and I'm afraid its beyond my abilities to decipher it.

The tabs.js I was using was working well but I hit a snag in it in that it
has no callback after the ajax onSuccess so I have no ability to trigger
other events... not sure what the workaround is... the author has an
afterOpen: callback but it doesn't get called on new tabs with an ajax load.

Not sure where I will go from here... may switch the entire project to
jq... may have to in order to meet the lauch date (2/1/2013) this seems
to be the sticking point however as all the other functionality is stubbed
in.

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote:

I'm now looking for/at tab controls that support ajax calls. The few
that I've found are pretty static in that you can assign tab A to a
specific AJAX request but you have no ability to dynamically create/destroy
tabs.

LivePipe Control.Tabs: http://livepipe.net/control/tabs + somewhere on
github is extended AJAXified version

or (based on LivePipe, added possibility to load content into tab via AJAX
request)

http://javascripts.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/javascripts/javascripts/js.ui/js/ui/control.tabs.js?revision=322view=markup
(it isn't self-sufficient, it requires CSS and other JS files from the
same project - ask me for details if you want)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/e6ESu2NmfY4J.
To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX Tabs Widget

2012-12-30 Thread Victor

 

 I'm now looking for/at tab controls that support ajax calls.  The few that 
 I've found are pretty static in that you can assign tab A to a specific 
 AJAX request but you have no ability to dynamically create/destroy tabs.


LivePipe Control.Tabs: http://livepipe.net/control/tabs + somewhere on 
github is extended AJAXified version

or (based on LivePipe, added possibility to load content into tab via AJAX 
request)
http://javascripts.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/javascripts/javascripts/js.ui/js/ui/control.tabs.js?revision=322view=markup
(it isn't self-sufficient, it requires CSS and other JS files from the same 
project - ask me for details if you want)



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/e6ESu2NmfY4J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: The buzz is MVC

2012-12-30 Thread Victor

Nobody answered... so I'll try to explain my point of view. In short words:
I don't need full JavaScript MVC framework.

I am working on Java web applications (J2EE or Spring based, running on
JBoss or Tomcat respectively). There are already MVC stacks on server side
(Struts + JSP, JSF + XHTML, Wicket + HTML, Spring MVC etc.) - they have
Java objects for Model, another Java objects for Controller, and HTML-based
markup files for View which is rendered into HTML and returned to client.
Another (pure JavaScript) MVC framework on client side is redundant -
rendering of Model into View (HTML) is perfectly done on server.

Client needs Controller (to work with UI widgets) and part of Model (object
identifiers etc.). Controller sends AJAX requests with needed parameters to
the server, and server returns rendered HTML, which can be inserted into
DOM, and optionally script with Model changes.

No Model to View rendering is done on the client side, all View templates
are stored in HTML-based text files (JSP, HTML).

This way gives possibility to describe few basic AJAX workflow templates
and implement them in single place using event delegation and single global
observer
(http://javascripts.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/javascripts/javascripts/js.ui/js/ui/behavior.ajaxify.js?revision=303view=markup):

1. User clicks on a link. AJAX request is sent to the server. Result is
inserted into desired container. (AJAX tabs, product descriptions, gallery
next/prev links etc.)
2. User clicks on a link. AJAX request is sent to the server. Result is
shown in modal box (lightbox, full-sized images, dialogs).
3. User submits form. Submission is intercepted, form data is sent via
AJAX. Result is inserted into desired container (votes, comments, etc.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/QnnQdDupFmYJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-30 Thread Victor




 I'm actually planning on taking whatever is still available on scripteka 
 and rehosting it on github so that others can find it, see examples of it 
 working, post issues and comment on the scripts

 Good idea! Do you have something to show already? Examples and issue 
tracking sounds good.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OvY44Z4adecJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-30 Thread Phil Petree

Amen... that would definately be a good move!  There are a number of things
on scripteka that are dead and gone (broken links)

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote:


 I'm actually planning on taking whatever is still available on scripteka
 and rehosting it on github so that others can find it, see examples of it
 working, post issues and comment on the scripts

 Good idea! Do you have something to show already? Examples and issue
 tracking sounds good.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OvY44Z4adecJ.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX Tabs Widget

2012-12-28 Thread Phil Petree

I managed to get Rolands tabs.js to work.  Essentially I added another
parameter to the addPanel function called relationship and then used that
in the new Element(). After Roland adds the Panel (creates a new tab) he
calls openPanel which will inturn call the AJAX call back.  Once there it
was easy to supply an AJAX script which then worked just like an existing
tab... actually pretty cool.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Phil Petree phil.pet...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All!

 I'm now looking for/at tab controls that support ajax calls.  The few that
 I've found are pretty static in that you can assign tab A to a specific
 AJAX request but you have no ability to dynamically create/destroy tabs.

 Think of the problem like this: you have a list of items (kits) and you
 want to view the contents of one of these kits so you click on the kit name
 and a user would expect a new tab to open and the contents of the kit to be
 displayed. The contents of the new tab will be a list of parts. Users will
 want to have more than one kit open at a time and, obviously, you don't
 want to download the contents of 10,000 kits.

 Another, simplier example might be like an inbox that list your emails and
 when you want to view one you click it and a new tab opens displaying the
 contents of the email.

 I found a great implementation by Rolan Franssen located here:
 http://roland.devarea.nl/work/tabs/
 and you can easily assign ajax calls to tabs, dynamically create / delete
 tabs etc. which is perfect for what I need except for one small, seemingly
 simple thing... I can't figure out how to get it to create a tab AND load
 the content via an ajax request and his code is a little out of my league.

 Does anyone know of a good tab control that can do this or has anyone
 modified Rolands code to do this?

 Thanks!

 Pete
 P.S. http://scripteka.com/ seems broken just like Walters scroll bars
 were... using ie9, you can't scroll the widgets list down.





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Cast a Class to Object

2012-12-20 Thread petrob

A class instance is an object, the result of the process when a Class is 
instantiated. I don't understand your question! Do you want to do something 
to a defined class constructor, or what?

2012. december 19., szerda 7:57:52 UTC+1 időpontban kstubs a következőt 
írta:

 Is there any way to take an insantiated Class and cast it to an Object?

 Karl..


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/BitAX2ZlhW8J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Difference between $(el).writeAttribute('checked', true) and $(el).checked = true

2012-12-20 Thread MadDog

Bumping this. I am using 1.7. I have tried using writeAttribute on a single 
html element and seems to be doing the same thing mentioned. This only 
happens after I actually click on the checkbox if a refresh the page it 
works as normal, but once I click it stops working.

Here is my code:

$('adminSubContractorPopActiveInput').writeAttribute({checked:jsonSubContractor['active']});
'active' is a boolean

got around this by doing this:
$('adminSubContractorPopActiveInput').checked = jsonSubContractor['active'];

Why would the first not work? Second works even after clicking on element.

Any help would br appreciated.

On Thursday, September 9, 2010 8:31:38 AM UTC-5, RQuadling wrote:

 Hi.

 I'm having all sorts of fun with dynamically setting the check in a 
 checkbox.

 Which way should I do things?

 Initially I thought something like this should work.

 $$('#container label
 input[type=checkbox][checked]').invoke('writeAttribute', 'checked',
 false);

 It doesn't.

 Instead it seems I have to ...

 $$('#container label

 input[type=checkbox]').findAll(function(el){!!el.checked;}).each(function(el{el.checked
 = false;});

 Having worked out this setting the grid became a LOT easier ...

 this.labels = $$(this.cssRuleName).invoke('removeClassName', 
 'cbGridChecked');
 $$(this.cssRuleName + ' input[type=checkbox]')
 .each(
 function(el_Checkbox){
 el_Checkbox.checked = (-1 !=
 this.IDs.indexOf(parseInt(el_Checkbox.value, 10)));
 },
 this
 );

 Any ideas what is happening?
 -- 
 Richard Quadling
 Twitter : EE : Zend
 @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/5pT1usKQb5sJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Maybe missing an other document observe listener?

2012-12-20 Thread tab1ta

*I should probably add*...

Il giorno giovedì 20 dicembre 2012 22:29:41 UTC+1, tab1ta ha scritto:

 The code of the page is a bit confusing cause i made it by myself, but 
 anyway, i have to make the mouseover and the mouseout event work together 
 so i should probably had an event listener.
 Without it i tried to make it work but without success. 
 The code is below:

 ?php
 require_once(tabs.php);
 ?
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN 
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
 html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
 head
 style type=text/css
 @import url(styles.css);
   /style
   script type=text/javascript src=
 http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.7/prototype.js;/script
   script type=text/javascript
   function showResult1()
 {

$('thing_1').replace('div id=thing_1 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }
   function showResult2()
 {

$('thing_2').replace('div id=thing_2 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }
   function showResult3()
 {

$('thing_3').replace('div id=thing_3 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }
   function showResult4()
 {

$('thing_4').replace('div id=thing_4 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }
   function showResult5()
 {

$('thing_5').replace('div id=thing_5 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }
   function showResult6()
 {

$('thing_6').replace('div id=thing_6 class=gallerylinkpa href=
 http://tinyurl.com/cwtt2yq;See Photo/a/p/div');
  
 }

 function hideResult1()
 {
 $('thing_1').replace('img id=thing_1 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/gallery1.jpg.jpg onmouseover=showResult1(); 
 style=position:relative; top:0px; left: 0px;/');
 }
 function hideResult2()
 {
 $('thing_2').replace('img id=thing_2 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/3188832812_573db43c7d.jpg onmouseover=showResult2();/');
 }
 function hideResult3()
 {
 $('thing_3').replace('img id=thing_3 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/3188858500_3437070b8f.jpg onmouseover=showResult3();/');
 }
 function hideResult4()
 {
 $('thing_4').replace('img id=thing_4 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/3188063503_e2b752444f.jpg onmouseover=showResult4();/');
 }
 function hideResult5()
 {
 $('thing_5').replace('img id=thing_5 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/3188039487_5fa50f0d02.jpg onmouseover=showResult5();/');
 }
 function hideResult6()
 {
 $('thing_6').replace('img id=thing_6 class=galleryitem 
 src=images/3188061317_d7a4bb7c27.jpg onmouseover=showResult6();/');
 }
 /script
 titlePython Speculative Interface/title

 /head
 body
 
 
 div class=maindiv id=header
 ?php tabs_start(); ?div class=main
 img class=logo src=images/psi.png //div
 ?php tab( Concept); ?
 
 div class=containere
 div class=boxtab
 form action=
 http://joy.indivia.net/py/cgi-bin/OOpoetry.cgi; method=get

 hPython from a theoretical point of view/h
 pThis interface aims to show and explain some 
 communicative and theoretical aspects 
 inscribed in the mechanisms behind a programming 
 language. The programming language named 
 Python is useful to achieve this goal as it provides 
 an interpreter but it can even run 
 source code as object code./p
 pIf you search for a command of the python 
 programming language in the form below you 
 will get the description of the logical and 
 communicative process executed by it in the 
 machine. The explanation can be of a logical, 
 mathematical or semiological nature./p
 p This is an attempt to enhance python programming 
 language as a signifying language, 
 which can execute not only algebrical processes but 
 even what could be defined as meaning./pbr /
 p
 input id=example name=stringx value=type 
 here/nbsp;nbsp;input id=submit type=submit 
 value=search//form/p
 /div
 ?php tab( Wiki ); ?
 img class=logo src=images/psi.png /
 div class=main
 div class=containere
 div class=boxtab
 hDiscussing about code and poetry/h
 pThe various aspects of python programming language, 
 and more in general of the object 
 oriented programming paradigm as a poetry, are 
 discussed inside this 
 a href=http://joy.indivia.net/wiki/index.php
 wiki/a/p

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Ajax.Request POST failure in Internet Explorer 8

2012-12-16 Thread Parikshit Tiwari

epoch,
How were you able to send the handshake? what did you do to send out 
the handshake was it something in the json packet that caused the browser 
to think that it was a response from the auth server? Please let me know, 
because I am facing a similar issue with IE8 and my server also uses LDAP 
server for authentication. 

Thanks,
Parik

On Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:58:07 AM UTC-7, epoch wrote:

 Hi Again 

 I have finally completed my debugging session and found the problem, 
 the problem was the NTLM authentication, seems like IE 
 needs a handshake from the server when it sends the blank request, as 
 soon as i send the handshake, the original Ajax.Request gets executed 
 again automatically 

 So consider this question closed, hope this thread helps other people 
 aswell. 

 Cheers everyone 

 On Apr 21, 9:58 am, epoch williescho...@gmail.com wrote: 
  Hi Again 
  
  Just an update, i have done further debugging and have finally found 
  the problem after looking at the request headers with fiddler. 
  the problem is that our system uses LDAP, the server is challenged 
  with WWW-Authenticate at the login page only once. 
  
  now only in internet explorer if I wait more than 30 seconds IE seems 
  to add an Authorization header to the Prototype request and drops 
  the query string. 
  So in other words i do not think that this is a prototype error but 
  rather a server side error, i will now try to remove that header 
  before the request. 
  
  If anybody else has any input, please share. 
  
  Thanks guys! 
  
  On Apr 20, 4:12 pm, epoch williescho...@gmail.com wrote: 
  
  
  
   Hi Guys 
  
   This is my first post. firstly i would like to congratulate everyone 
   who helped make prototype awesome! 
  
   Secondly I have a very strange problem, I would consider myself very 
   well versed with Prototype (been using it more than one year) 
  
   It appears my ajax request's stop executing after 20-30 seconds of the 
   previous ajax request (not page load). 
   I have debugged this and found out that prototype does indeed have the 
   parameters and sends it successfully (without errors), but my server 
   side handler (a jsp) returns all request.getParameter(variable) 
   calls null. 
  
   if I then start clicking the button that makes the ajax request 
   quickly in succession, it starts receiving the parameters again? 
  
   this only happens when using the post method which in turn sends using 
   xmlhttp.send(postBody). also if i manually append the parameters to 
   the url and use xmlhttp.send(null), everything works as expected 
  
   This only affects internet explorer, other browsers work perfectly. 
   this made me think that the underlying XMLHttpRequest object has a 
   problem. 
  
   Unfortuntally i do not have the neccesarry skill to continue debugging 
   further. Can anyone please assist me with this? 
  
   here is a code example of how I can create the problem automatically 
   (with IE) : 
  
   var xu = function(o) { 
   new Ajax.Request('AjaxComponentServlet', { 
   parameters: { 
   action: 'TESTER ' + o + ' ' + new Date(), 
   random: Math.random() 
   }, 
   method: 'post' 
   }); 
   window.setTimeout('xu(' + (o + 1) + ')', (o*1)); 
   } 
  
   Event.observe(window, 'load', function() { 
   window.setTimeout('xu(1)', 1 * (1000 * 10)); 
   }); 
  
   -- 
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Prototype  script.aculo.us group. 
   To post to this group, send email to 
   prototype-s...@googlegroups.comjavascript:. 

   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
   For more options, visit this group athttp://
 groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups Prototype  script.aculo.us group. 
  To post to this group, send email to 
  prototype-s...@googlegroups.comjavascript:. 

  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  For more options, visit this group athttp://
 groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. 

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group. 
 To post to this group, send email to 
 prototype-s...@googlegroups.comjavascript:. 

 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype test cases

2012-12-10 Thread Ahmed Ashour

Hi all,

Were the Prototype test cases removed?

Ahmed


On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 2:04:29 PM UTC+3, Ahmed Ashour wrote:

 Hi all,

 I built Prototype 1.7.1 and tried to execute the test cases, however there 
 is no HTML in /test/unit as hinted in http://prototypejs.org/contribute

 Appreciate your response,

 Ahmed


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/eHmVKP26nWkJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-02 Thread Jason Westbrook

I'm actually planning on taking whatever is still available on scripteka
and rehosting it on github so that others can find it, see examples of it
working, post issues and comment on the scripts

Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:21 AM, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:

..and related to all of this is a site like this:
http://scripteka.com

Where a ton of the script that use to be available, well the
underlying/host site for the code have dropped off the WWW universe.
Very sad :( A lot of broken links.

Karl..

On Saturday, December 1, 2012 6:54:42 AM UTC-7, isurge wrote:

We let our IE 6 clients go.

On 12/1/12 1:48 AM, petrob wrote:
I understood why a lot of companies still insist on using IE6 when at
a large hypermarket chain the accounting staff pointed out that their
very expensive accounting software can only be run on IE6 or on IE9+.
The cost efficient solution for them is to go on running their legal
copies of XP on some hundreds of computers with IE6 and ban any
acive-x objects and script (java, javascript, flash etc) on the
company server. So, it is the operating system that is behind the
longevity of IE in the corporate field and , unfortunately, it will
remain the same for a long time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/**msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/**
--r_rxEpnswJhttps://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/--r_rxEpnswJ.

To post to this group, send email to
prototype-s...@**googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+**unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/**group/prototype-scriptaculous?**hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype old documentation

2012-12-01 Thread petrob

The old documentation must have just been replace by the new one... The 
bigger problem is that the most recent one is still far the weakest part of 
the whole project, as it is laconic, incomplete, even faulty in some cases 
and it does not encourage any deeper understanding of the code base.  Just 
search for some keywords like 'error tickets / mistakes in the code base / 
in the documentation', and the like, and you will be quickly up-to date 
about it, but I will leave it now...

The need for using the $break object is based on how iteration is handled 
in Prototype in the 'each' method where any iterator functions are passed 
on to be called in the _each method in a  try- catch structure. 
In this way any errors in any bad function calls at any depth are caught by 
the high level catch branch.. Because the native boiler- plate iteration 
always only takes place in the high-level scope of the  _each method, you 
will get an error if you try to call the break command in an embedded 
method to try to step out of the high-level loop as there is no iteration 
taking place in that deeper scope, at all. Instead, Prototype throws a 
special error object to do exactly that.

In the any method - for instance- 
/*...cut...*/
this.each(function(value, index) {
  if (result = !!iterator.call(context, value, index, this))
throw $break;
}, this);
/*...cut..*/
the $break object is thrown when the iterator function returns a boolean 
true value for the first element. The loop is broken and the result 
variable is returned. In the catch branch of each the special $break error 
object is recognized and evaluated to do nothing then.
catch (e) {
  if (e != $break) throw e;
}


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/0YxJECvdIr8J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-01 Thread petrob

I understood why a lot of companies still insist on using IE6 when at a 
large hypermarket chain the accounting staff pointed out that their very 
expensive accounting software can only be run on IE6 or on IE9+. The cost 
efficient solution for them is to go on running their legal copies of XP on 
some hundreds of computers with IE6 and ban any acive-x objects and script 
(java, javascript, flash etc) on the company server. So, it is the 
operating system that is behind the longevity of IE in the corporate field 
and , unfortunately, it will remain the same for a long time.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/--r_rxEpnswJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-01 Thread James Brake


We let our IE 6 clients go.

On 12/1/12 1:48 AM, petrob wrote:
I understood why a lot of companies still insist on using IE6 when at 
a large hypermarket chain the accounting staff pointed out that their 
very expensive accounting software can only be run on IE6 or on IE9+. 
The cost efficient solution for them is to go on running their legal 
copies of XP on some hundreds of computers with IE6 and ban any 
acive-x objects and script (java, javascript, flash etc) on the 
company server. So, it is the operating system that is behind the 
longevity of IE in the corporate field and , unfortunately, it will 
remain the same for a long time.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/--r_rxEpnswJ.
To post to this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype 
 script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-12-01 Thread kstubs

..and related to all of this is a site like this:
http://scripteka.com

Where a ton of the script that use to be available, well the 
underlying/host site for the code have dropped off the WWW universe.
Very sad :(  A lot of broken links.

Karl..

On Saturday, December 1, 2012 6:54:42 AM UTC-7, isurge wrote:

 We let our IE 6 clients go. 

 On 12/1/12 1:48 AM, petrob wrote: 
  I understood why a lot of companies still insist on using IE6 when at 
  a large hypermarket chain the accounting staff pointed out that their 
  very expensive accounting software can only be run on IE6 or on IE9+. 
  The cost efficient solution for them is to go on running their legal 
  copies of XP on some hundreds of computers with IE6 and ban any 
  acive-x objects and script (java, javascript, flash etc) on the 
  company server. So, it is the operating system that is behind the 
  longevity of IE in the corporate field and , unfortunately, it will 
  remain the same for a long time. 
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
  Groups Prototype  script.aculo.us group. 
  To view this discussion on the web visit 
  https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/--r_rxEpnswJ. 
  To post to this group, send email to 
  prototype-s...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  For more options, visit this group at 
  http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/mmHzcI7zWxMJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype old documentation

2012-12-01 Thread kstubs

This is the link to the old documentation, which has been available for a 
long time but is no longer available
http://prototypejs.org/api

What I like more about the old documentation was there were better examples 
inline with the API code.  The new API, albeit a much better interface, is 
suited more for advanced coders I think.  

Now, having said that, there looks like some additional work has been done 
to these pages:
http://prototypejs.org/learn/

I have been working on an icon factory helper script, which, given an icon 
image sprite lets you pick an icon and gives you back the correct static 
icon factory get method for use in your code, and well I found the *Measuring 
Elements and Offsets* section very useful!
I think we should focus on expanding these articles and I think the API 
should reference these articles wherever possible.  

Karl..

On Saturday, December 1, 2012 2:17:24 AM UTC-7, petrob wrote:

 The old documentation must have just been replace by the new one... The 
 bigger problem is that the most recent one is still far the weakest part of 
 the whole project, as it is laconic, incomplete, even faulty in some cases 
 and it does not encourage any deeper understanding of the code base.  Just 
 search for some keywords like 'error tickets / mistakes in the code base / 
 in the documentation', and the like, and you will be quickly up-to date 
 about it, but I will leave it now...

 The need for using the $break object is based on how iteration is handled 
 in Prototype in the 'each' method where any iterator functions are passed 
 on to be called in the _each method in a  try- catch structure. 
 In this way any errors in any bad function calls at any depth are caught 
 by the high level catch branch.. Because the native boiler- plate iteration 
 always only takes place in the high-level scope of the  _each method, you 
 will get an error if you try to call the break command in an embedded 
 method to try to step out of the high-level loop as there is no iteration 
 taking place in that deeper scope, at all. Instead, Prototype throws a 
 special error object to do exactly that.

 In the any method - for instance- 
 /*...cut...*/
 this.each(function(value, index) {
   if (result = !!iterator.call(context, value, index, this))
 throw $break;
 }, this);
 /*...cut..*/
 the $break object is thrown when the iterator function returns a boolean 
 true value for the first element. The loop is broken and the result 
 variable is returned. In the catch branch of each the special $break error 
 object is recognized and evaluated to do nothing then.
 catch (e) {
   if (e != $break) throw e;
 }




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/PpEtc7HOjkQJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-26 Thread kstubs

Agreed!  I'm not too keen on this idea but have been searching for a 
solution to better encapsulate my code and assets.  I do not consider domo 
the answer, but was an interesting idea.
Something we are doing in prototype with the Template class does put HTML 
markup directly into the JS code.  I am trying to mediate this though by 
collecting all of my template markup in a separate JS namespaced object. 
 This is helping a lot.  And if you don't mind inline style markup in the 
result, you can do the same thing, keep all of your style together in a 
separate JS object.

Karl..



On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 2:53:18 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote:

 Domo

 http://domo-js.com/


 From the J2EE developer's point of view it looks like return back to 
 2000s, to Servlets and tons of HTML/CSS markup in code. IMHO all advanced 
 Java developers agree that moving HTML markup from Java code into separate 
 JSP files was great step forward.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/vCndJz-CfJAJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: setStyle after clonePosition not working

2012-11-26 Thread kstubs

I appreciate the follow up petrob.  I am not new to Prototype, I've been 
using if for 3-4 years now.
Yes, I have stepped through the code, have invoked setStyle from the 
console, etc.. to no evail.   
This particular issue has slipped away a bit, when it comes around again 
and is high priority I will put together that sample code and investigate 
further.

Karl..

On Friday, November 16, 2012 2:18:56 AM UTC-7, petrob wrote:

 Ok.Yes, I have made mistakes in my code that caused Prototype methods not 
 to work. Prototype methods do not work on unextended elements - if you lose 
 the reference to your element in a variable, for whatever reason-, if you 
 try to call element methods on non-elements, or you are calling an element 
 method with a typo in the argument, for instance. Have you checked all 
 these by placing break points in firebug at some critical points in your 
 code? Do you get any error messages in the console? Have you tried setting 
 some style properties on your element directly through the native style 
 declaration object? I would do this latter one first!
 There are always people here to help beginners (in Prototype!)  out if 
 they see an effort.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/VnYxXpYW_QIJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-11-26 Thread kstubs

Great followup T.J., much appreciated.

On Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:06:02 AM UTC-7, T.J. Crowder wrote:

 On Sunday, 23 October 2011 17:43:39 UTC+1, T.J. Crowder wrote:

 Hi, 

 On Oct 23, 5:35 pm, wwwboy www...@pochta.ru wrote: 
  With the speed of which modern browsers release updates and move toward 
 HTML5 - 
  I think there will be no significant differences between them in a 
 year. 
  IE8 will not be alive in a year in the light of Windows8 with IE10 and 
 canceling 
  support XP - so there will be IE9 and IE10 which a close to other 
 browsers. 

 I think you're being very optimistic there, particularly with regard 
 to how quickly Windows users will upgrade. 


 And here we are, a year later, and guess what? IE8 still has more market 
 share (24%) than IE9 (20%). :-)

 http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2qpcustomd=0

 -- T.J.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/w1I0Q58Fr9QJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-26 Thread Marc

At Mad Mimi I created an extension to Template which looks something like 
this:

Template.from = function(id) {
  if(!$(id)) {
console.warn(Missing template for  + id);
  } else {
return new Template($(id).innerHTML.replace(/%23%7B(.*)%7D/g, #{$1}));
  }
};

Then in your HTML you'd have script blocks that look something like this:

script id=my_template type=text/template
  This is a #{template}.
/script

And in your JS you'd simply go:

Template.from('my_template').evaluate({ template: Template in my HTML 
where it should be });

-- Marc

On Monday, November 26, 2012 5:57:27 PM UTC+2, kstubs wrote:

 Agreed!  I'm not too keen on this idea but have been searching for a 
 solution to better encapsulate my code and assets.  I do not consider domo 
 the answer, but was an interesting idea.
 Something we are doing in prototype with the Template class does put HTML 
 markup directly into the JS code.  I am trying to mediate this though by 
 collecting all of my template markup in a separate JS namespaced object. 
  This is helping a lot.  And if you don't mind inline style markup in the 
 result, you can do the same thing, keep all of your style together in a 
 separate JS object.

 Karl..



 On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 2:53:18 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote:

 Domo

 http://domo-js.com/


 From the J2EE developer's point of view it looks like return back to 
 2000s, to Servlets and tons of HTML/CSS markup in code. IMHO all advanced 
 Java developers agree that moving HTML markup from Java code into separate 
 JSP files was great step forward.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/bBsjG76ML9gJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Safe way to access head style element

2012-11-21 Thread kstubs

Excellent.  Thanks for the replies.


On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:07:44 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote:

 Get head element in pure JS:
 var head = document.head || document.getElementsByTagName(head)[0];

 Get first style element in pure JS:
 var style = document.getElementsByTagName(style)[0];

 Get first style element in Prototype JS:
 var style = $$(style).first();

 Modification of text in existing style element IMHO may be different in IE 
 and W3C-compliant browsers - IE can modify content of style via property 
 style.styleSheet.cssText, W3C browsers via DOM style.childNodes[0] or 
 property style.innerText.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/fPSf-7xkKN0J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-20 Thread Victor

Domo

 http://domo-js.com/


From the J2EE developer's point of view it looks like return back to 2000s, 
to Servlets and tons of HTML/CSS markup in code. IMHO all advanced Java 
developers agree that moving HTML markup from Java code into separate JSP 
files was great step forward.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OZ8N-sCXLCwJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-16 Thread Victor

What is domo? Share a link please.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/_0QkXgH3wG4J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: setStyle after clonePosition not working

2012-11-16 Thread petrob

Ok.Yes, I have made mistakes in my code that caused Prototype methods not 
to work. Prototype methods do not work on unextended elements - if you lose 
the reference to your element in a variable, for whatever reason-, if you 
try to call element methods on non-elements, or you are calling an element 
method with a typo in the argument, for instance. Have you checked all 
these by placing break points in firebug at some critical points in your 
code? Do you get any error messages in the console? Have you tried setting 
some style properties on your element directly through the native style 
declaration object? I would do this latter one first!
There are always people here to help beginners (in Prototype!)  out if they 
see an effort.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/UCFqtqFJkVgJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-16 Thread kstubs

Domo
http://domo-js.com/

I'm also looking at Eyeballs and Choco as possible, MVC like, frameworks to 
sit on top of Prototype.

https://github.com/paulca/eyeballs.js
https://github.com/ahe/choco

On Friday, November 16, 2012 2:08:23 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote:

 What is domo? Share a link please.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/YYeBItP3oowJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: domo and protoype.js

2012-11-16 Thread kstubs

Here's sample code:
http://pastie.org/5388646

On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:28:33 AM UTC-7, kstubs wrote:

 Domo
 http://domo-js.com/

 I'm also looking at Eyeballs and Choco as possible, MVC like, frameworks 
 to sit on top of Prototype.

 https://github.com/paulca/eyeballs.js
 https://github.com/ahe/choco

 On Friday, November 16, 2012 2:08:23 AM UTC-7, Victor wrote:

 What is domo? Share a link please.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/e3NTJdLi2KMJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: setStyle after clonePosition not working

2012-11-15 Thread kstubs

 if these are all right, provide a minimal-case code snippet that represents 
 the problem
 not expect other people to do all the job for you..

I was merely looking for verification on the behavior of the two methods in 
code, and wondering if anyone else had experienced similar.
Man I hate forum bashing.

At any rate: I'll try and get a sample together.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/ngXIRo80HKAJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: setStyle after clonePosition not working

2012-11-14 Thread petrob

The clone position method and setting style properties on an element have 
nothing to do with each -other.
Could you:

use firebug to place break points in your code to see the values of your 
variables before / on / after using these methods!
if these are all right, provide a minimal-case code snippet that represents 
the problem
not expect other people to do all the job for you..


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/BGL90LW3sgEJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Getting prototype javascript issue on Googl chrome - ripple emulator

2012-11-12 Thread Victor

Is your code working in Chrome and other browsers? IMHO error is not in 
Prototype - all tests and code for document.getElementsByClassName work in 
Ripple emulator. Maybe you are invoking document.getElementsByClassName() 
for wrong or non-existent object (not HTML element).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/Wb3MuOgsz4kJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Customization event on click and when there is no characters

Try to format your code. It's an unreadable mess. Or, even better, try to 
make working example on jsfiddle.net.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/XL9k96yH4IQJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Getting prototype javascript issue on Googl chrome - ripple emulator

Which platform/runtime you have selected in Ripple?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/Ap1D4ILwyLAJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Getting prototype javascript issue on Googl chrome - ripple emulator

document.body.getElementsByTagName exists in Ripple. Can you give more 
details (stack trace, small code sample etc.)?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/zR7VhA2gyqcJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Getting prototype javascript issue on Googl chrome - ripple emulator

Which version of Prototype you use? As far as I can see almost all unit 
tests pass on this emulator. Maybe error is in your code.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/LhvTeIQ0TWMJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: anyone experiencing issues in IE10

1. Fix all markup errors (check in W3C validator).
2. Place CSS links before any scripts.
3. Move all scripts from onload, onmouseout and other attributes into 
script.
4. Move that script into separate file.
5. Do not use document.images, document.layers, document.forms. Use $() 
instead of document.getElementById(). Learn Prototype.

My Prototype 1.7 applications work fine in IE10 (as in all other Grade A 
browsers).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/niQcB1qKBtMJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Old 1.6.1 library

Sizzle may need to escape special chars in CSS selector like this 
'[ui\:draggable=true]' or '[ui\\:draggable=true]' - not sure about 
count of backslashes, but I've already met similar error in Sizzle.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/hh5YibA7fxwJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Future of Prototyp.js

2012-10-21 Thread T.J. Crowder

On Sunday, 23 October 2011 17:43:39 UTC+1, T.J. Crowder wrote:

 Hi, 

 On Oct 23, 5:35 pm, wwwboy www...@pochta.ru wrote: 
  With the speed of which modern browsers release updates and move toward 
 HTML5 - 
  I think there will be no significant differences between them in a year. 
  IE8 will not be alive in a year in the light of Windows8 with IE10 and 
 canceling 
  support XP - so there will be IE9 and IE10 which a close to other 
 browsers. 

 I think you're being very optimistic there, particularly with regard 
 to how quickly Windows users will upgrade. 


And here we are, a year later, and guess what? IE8 still has more market 
share (24%) than IE9 (20%). :-)
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2qpcustomd=0

-- T.J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/mbafvlZ3-egJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Sysko

Thanks Dave, I'm still not sure why my visible() comparison wrapper was 
registering as null when i originally first attempted to perform the 
functions, because that looks something like what I first tried.

Thanks again to Jason suggestions to use a Hash, I have since modified the 
interface to utilize two hashes, one for the systems, and one for the 8 
modules of each system. the relatively stable navigational interface is 
working mostly how I want it now. http://monkeypanelcom/demo

Sm:)e

On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:30:17 AM UTC-4, DaveK wrote:

 To answer your OP directly (not sure if it has been, I didn't notice it). 

open_div = 'system'+k+''; 
... 
if ($(open_div).visible()==true) { 

 if there is no item with id 'system'+k then $(open_div) returns null 
 (correctly) and so $(open_div).visible() throws an error. (for example 
 if nothing has id='system123' then when k-123 the error wiil throw) 

 You can avoid it with: 

if ($(open_div)) { 
if ($(open_div).visible()==true) { 


 Dave 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/k3nbGQ3PkhgJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Sysko



  http://monkeypanel.com/demo http://monkeypanel.com/demo oops.. a dot 
 usually works before the 'com'  hehe



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/MOTNWle-MywJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

Thanks for the suggestion, Jason. Most people don't run into this problem 
because they do not deal with dynamically assigned div ids from javascript 
variables. I found for what i am doing it was the most efficient way to go 
about referencing the divs. otherwise, switch statements with 33 cases 
would have to do, and that was pretty intensive.

It does appear that the $(element) wrapper doesn't play nice at all with 
javascript variables, you actually have to put the quotes exactly as they 
appear on the div. (unless I am still doing it wrong).. i tried .toString 
functions, parseInt's, double quotes, single quotes, with and without the 
$wrapers, etc.. and finally I looked into the prototype.js script and the 
visible method is really simple, just checks if the display: property of 
the style attribute is set to none and returns a boolean value, so the 
workaround is to get the element with the document.getElementbyID (which*does 
*work fine with javasscript variable as the ID), and do the conditional 
statement custom. In the process of researching this bug I made a series of 
alternative functions as a different way to skin the cat. Currently they 
keep track of which systems are closed, minimized or unopen with some 
innerHTML in a hidden div that references the index (100-133) with the 
letter U, M or O, then rewrites the entire string when it changes.
the initial div looks like this: (all systems unopened):

div id=mb_system_state_references 
style=display:none;100=U:101=U:102=U:103=U:104=U:105=U:106=U:107=U:108=U:109=U:110=U:111=U:112=U:113=U:114=U:115=U:116=U:117=U:118=U:119=U:120=U:121=U:122=U:123=U:124=U:125=U:126=U:127=U:128=U:129=U:130=U:131=U:132=U/div


I have got half of the functions working, you can see what I am working on 
here: http://monkeypanel.com/demo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OHJUzayk4UAJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

2012-10-15 Thread Jason Westbrook

I've never had a problem with putting variables into the $() function

but I do have a suggestion for keeping your open/minimized/closed panels
straight

try declaring a global array or hash and using that as the status variable
- all the javascript functions can use it natively and you don't have to do
the expensive splitting every time you want to know what panels are open

example

var panels = new Hash({system100 : M, system101:U}); //etc

//then

panels.get(system+id);
//or
panels.set(system+id,U);

you can even initialize it easily

for(var t = 100 ; t = 132 ; t++)
{
   panels.set(system+t,U);
}


Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com



On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Peter Sysko petersy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for the suggestion, Jason. Most people don't run into this problem
 because they do not deal with dynamically assigned div ids from javascript
 variables. I found for what i am doing it was the most efficient way to go
 about referencing the divs. otherwise, switch statements with 33 cases
 would have to do, and that was pretty intensive.

 It does appear that the $(element) wrapper doesn't play nice at all with
 javascript variables, you actually have to put the quotes exactly as they
 appear on the div. (unless I am still doing it wrong).. i tried .toString
 functions, parseInt's, double quotes, single quotes, with and without the
 $wrapers, etc.. and finally I looked into the prototype.js script and the
 visible method is really simple, just checks if the display: property of
 the style attribute is set to none and returns a boolean value, so the
 workaround is to get the element with the document.getElementbyID (which*does
 *work fine with javasscript variable as the ID), and do the conditional
 statement custom. In the process of researching this bug I made a series of
 alternative functions as a different way to skin the cat. Currently they
 keep track of which systems are closed, minimized or unopen with some
 innerHTML in a hidden div that references the index (100-133) with the
 letter U, M or O, then rewrites the entire string when it changes.
 the initial div looks like this: (all systems unopened):


 div id=mb_system_state_references
 style=display:none;100=U:101=U:102=U:103=U:104=U:105=U:106=U:107=U:108=U:109=U:110=U:111=U:112=U:113=U:114=U:115=U:116=U:117=U:118=U:119=U:120=U:121=U:122=U:123=U:124=U:125=U:126=U:127=U:128=U:129=U:130=U:131=U:132=U/div


 I have got half of the functions working, you can see what I am working on
 here: http://monkeypanel.com/demo

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/OHJUzayk4UAJ.

 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

whoa i had no idea you could do that with javascript array. i just didn't 
think the data persistence was possible, even if the window was still open. 
but it makes perfect sense, and much simpler than what i'm doing now. I 
will have to give it a shot tomorrow, thank you!

On Monday, October 15, 2012 2:15:23 PM UTC-4, Peter Sysko wrote:

 I love prototype and scriptacualous. I don't combine with jquery so i know 
 i am not having a noclonflict headache,
 and I am just trying to get the visible() function (
 http://prototypejs.org/api/element/visible)
 to not throw null type error exceptions: here is the function I need to 
 fix, syntactically:
 the function creates an associative array to track which of 33 system 
 panels are either open, unopen, or minimized*:
 **(the systems are indexed from 100 to 132)*

 function get_system_states() { 
 var k=0; var sys_array = new Array(); var open_div=''; var min_div='';
 for(k=100;k132;k++){
 open_div = 'system'+k+'';
 min_div = open_div+'_minimized';
 if ($(open_div).visible()==true) {
 sys_array[k] = o; // o = open
 } 
 if ($(min_div).visible()==true) {
 sys_array[k] = m; // m = minimized
 }
 if (($(open_div).visible()==false)($(min_div).visible()==false)) 
 {
 sys_array[k] = c;// u = unopen
 }
 }
 return sys_array;
 }

 Javscript console error says : 

1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'visible' of null
   1. 
   

 the first IF statement in the for loop is throwing the exception, but I 
 assume I am not assigning the div values correctly?
 i have found no answers in this group from a text search and from a 
 general google search. 
 is this a single quotation reference? my div id's are dynamically written 
 in php codeignite, which shouldnt really matter.

 any suggestions for how to properly get the visibility of each div in each 
 current state?
 thanks!!
 -pete



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/dodF3TNhKR0J.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

2012-10-15 Thread Jason Westbrook

to be clear - the example I put is not a javascript array but a Prototype
Hash

you should be able to do the same thing with a javascript array though

Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com



On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Peter Sysko petersy...@gmail.com wrote:

 whoa i had no idea you could do that with javascript array. i just didn't
 think the data persistence was possible, even if the window was still open.
 but it makes perfect sense, and much simpler than what i'm doing now. I
 will have to give it a shot tomorrow, thank you!


 On Monday, October 15, 2012 2:15:23 PM UTC-4, Peter Sysko wrote:

 I love prototype and scriptacualous. I don't combine with jquery so i
 know i am not having a noclonflict headache,
 and I am just trying to get the visible() function (
 http://prototypejs.org/api/**element/visiblehttp://prototypejs.org/api/element/visible
 )
 to not throw null type error exceptions: here is the function I need to
 fix, syntactically:
 the function creates an associative array to track which of 33 system
 panels are either open, unopen, or minimized*:
 **(the systems are indexed from 100 to 132)*

 function get_system_states() {
 var k=0; var sys_array = new Array(); var open_div=''; var min_div='';
 for(k=100;k132;k++){
 open_div = 'system'+k+'';
 min_div = open_div+'_minimized';
 if ($(open_div).visible()==true) {
 sys_array[k] = o; // o = open
 }
 if ($(min_div).visible()==true) {
 sys_array[k] = m; // m = minimized
 }
 if 
 (($(open_div).visible()==**false)($(min_div).visible()=**=false))
 {
 sys_array[k] = c;// u = unopen
 }
 }
 return sys_array;
 }

 Javscript console error says :

1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'visible' of null
   1.


 the first IF statement in the for loop is throwing the exception, but I
 assume I am not assigning the div values correctly?
 i have found no answers in this group from a text search and from a
 general google search.
 is this a single quotation reference? my div id's are dynamically written
 in php codeignite, which shouldnt really matter.

 any suggestions for how to properly get the visibility of each div in
 each current state?
 thanks!!
 -pete

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/dodF3TNhKR0J.

 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

right, i found it: http://api.prototypejs.org/language/dollar-H/
i am used to the idea of assuming zero data persistence in a runtime 
environment
so i'm not sure how this works outside the function scope. in php you have 
to serialize variables,
use a global or superglobal array, use database, files, etc. on a client im 
used to seeing cookies
being used, I am just wondering what the scope limit of this use is, as i 
am used to treating 
javacsript variables scope at function level only, passing them being 
required with get and setter methods
 I'll try the $H idea and see how it works. Thanks again

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/lqdbv0kJ5NoJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?

fpr what its worth, these are some the handler functions I have created.
 the logic s fine, but your suggestion is much less work, it seems, 
and there are a few bugs which i commented out. i am not an expert in JS, 
its not veryintuitive for me


 function get_system_states() {
var ref = document.getElementById('mb_system_state_references');
var systemz = [];
systemz = ref.innerHTML.split(:,33); 
// innerHTML default state reference (U=Unopen, O=Open, M=Minimized) :
//100=U:101=U:102=U:103=U:104=U:105=U:106=U:107=U:108=U:109=U:
//110=U:111=U:112=U:113=U:114=U:115=U:116=U:117=U:118=U:119=U:
//120=U:121=U:122=U:123=U:124=U:125=U:126=U:127=U:128=U:129=U:
//130=U:131=U:132=U   
var mb_statez = [];
for(k=100;k133;k++) {
var n = k-100; // system 100 should be index 0, system 132 should 
be index 32
var sys_string = systemz[n];
var system_statez = sys_string.split(=,2);
var state = system_statez[1]; // index 0 should be the system 
number, index 1 is the letter U, M or O
mb_statez[n] = state;
} // end loop
return mb_statez;
 } // end function
 
 function get_system_state(system_index) {
 system_index+='';
 var s = get_system_states();
 var n = (parseInt(system_index)-100);
 return s[n];
 } 
 
 function set_system_state(system_index,new_state){
 var s = []; s=get_system_states(); var n = 0;
 system_index+=''; var new_ref_string=;
 //alert('setting new system state: '+new_state);
 for(k=100;k133;k++) { n = k-100;
 //if not the setting we are setting, write its current state 
 if ((system_index)==k.toString()) {
 new_ref_string+=k+'='+new_state;
 } else {  // else, write the new one
  new_ref_string+=k+'='+s[n]; 
 } // end else
 new_ref_string+=:;
} // end for loop

document.getElementById('mb_system_state_references').innerHTML=new_ref_string;
//alert('writing new innerHTML as: '+new_ref_string);
  return false;
 } // function

function minimize_mb_system(system_index) {
//if (get_system_state(system_index)==M)
 //{  
system_index+='';
var sp_div_id = 'system'+system_index+'';
var min_div_id = 'system'+system_index+'_minimized';
Effect.SwitchOff(sp_div_id);
Effect.Appear(min_div_id);
set_system_state(system_index,M);
return false;
//}
//else { var warning = system display state is already minimized. 
did not collapse.; return warning; }
}
function restore_mb_system(system_index) {
//if (get_system_state(system_index)==O)
 //{  
system_index+='';
var sp_div_id = 'system'+system_index;
var min_div_id =  'system'+system_index+'_minimized';
Effect.Appear(''+sp_div_id+'');
Effect.SwitchOff(''+min_div_id+'');
set_system_state(system_index,O);
return false;
//}
//else { var warning = system display state is already open. did 
not restore.; return warning; }
}

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/dQqsVP_C75wJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Hi, new to group. Having an issue with visible() method. any suggestions?