Hi,
I have an application that uses Ajax.Request and its onSuccess event
handler in lots of places.
I need to call a function (that will check the response) before all
these onSuccess events fired. I tried using Ajax.Responders.register
with onComplete event but it fires after Ajax.Request's on
perhaps put your code up so someone can evaulate it and put forward a
suggesiton ?
- Original Message -
From: "matte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Extending every Ajax.Request onSuccess event
>
A few bugs have been fixed and some new additions made including double
clicking the title bar to maximize/minify the window, Z-indexes fixed to
position windows accordingly when having multiple smaller windows open in
the container, inner Heights fixed on the content to not overlap the resize
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the reply.
Generic Ajax.Request code:
new Ajax.Request(URL, {
method: 'post',
parameters: OPTIONS,
onSuccess: function(transport) { console.log('Request success'); }
});
And my extension:
Ajax.Responders.register({
onComplete: function(reque
Easier to read those on Pastie:
http://pastie.org/313717
http://pastie.org/313718
-- T.J. :-)
On Nov 13, 9:48 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mert,
>
> You can create a factory function for requests that inserts your
> handler, something like this:
>
> * * * *
> function speci
Hi TJ,
Thank you very much! That is what i wanted. One last question though,
I have lots of (I mean lots lots of) 'new Ajax.Request' calls in the
application source. So is there a way to do this centralized instead
of replacing every 'new Ajax.Request' call. Maybe extending the
Ajax.Request base
Hi Mert,
You can create a factory function for requests that inserts your
handler, something like this:
* * * *
function specialSuccessStuff(transport)
{
// ...whatever your special onSuccess stuff is...
}
function makeRequest(url, options) {
var orig;
orig = options.onSuccess;
Hi,
Yes it is more straight forward but gobally replacing lots of code
seems to be a bit out of control and prone to bugs to me.
Thanks a lot TJ.
Mert.
On Nov 13, 12:38 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Do you have any thoughts or
> > suggestions on this?
>
> Just that i
Hi,
> Yes it is more straight forward but gobally replacing lots of code
> seems to be a bit out of control and prone to bugs to me.
Hmmm, to me it's modifying the Prototype internals that's the riskier,
more error-prone choice. :-)
> Thanks a lot TJ.
No worries, good luck with it.
-- T.J.
O
that is strange for the safari ... i just tested it on my version and they
are in the correct place ...
out of interest what safari version are you running ?
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:20 AM
Subje
Just incase pastie service goes offline in the future, i paste the
code below for future references.
function ajaxRespondToReadyStateWrapper(orig, readyState) {
var state = Ajax.Request.Events[readyState];
var response = new Ajax.Response(this)
if (state == 'Complete') {
Hi I'm getting very odd behaviour with the effects on ie/&ie6
I get an error on:
toggle: function(element, effect) {
element = $(element);
effect = (effect || 'appear').toLowerCase();
var options = Object.extend({
queue: { position:'end', scope:(element.id || 'global'), limit:
Hi,
> Do you have any thoughts or
> suggestions on this?
Just that it will be fragile. The next version of Prototype might not
have respondToReadyState, or may have it with different params, or,
or, ...
Seriously, isn't it more straight-forward to do a global search and
replace changing "new A
Hi,
> I have lots of (I mean lots lots of) 'new Ajax.Request' calls in the
> application source.
Global search and replace? :-)
> Maybe extending the
> Ajax.Request base?
You could do that, sure, in your own copy of prototype.js; just search
for Ajax.Request and modify the initialize function
i just fugured it out ... if you are on a smaller resolution then the title
of the minified window will take up most of the allowed width, ergo sending
the buttons down to compensate ... i should limit the title length really in
smaller windows, i will add the fix to it today at some point
Reg
Cool-I definitely like the minimize/restore/maximize buttons much better!
One strange thing: when I tested on Safari for Windows, the buttons
were slightly below the title bar for a non-maximized window.
I must confess that I have dealt very little with Javascript, and must
say that the Prototyp
thanks ... i would imagine its the resolution viewed at .. mine is 1280/800
and the title text is rather excessive ... normally it would say somehting
like "Address Book - John Doe"
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November
Hi TJ,
Based on your wrap recommendation I have extended prototype (wrapped
Ajax.request.prototype.respondToReadyState function) without modifying
the initialize function and source code of prototype js. Here is the
link to code: http://pastie.org/313738.
I hope this helps someone else too. Do y
Safari 3.1.2, and IE7, not IE6...
I have a Mac at home with Windows and Linux virtual machines, so I
will try these over the weekend.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Alex Mcauley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that is strange for the safari ... i just tested it on my version and they
> are in
Dear all
I'm looking for inspiration. Take a look at this code:
http://pastie.org/313941
In a simple HTML page this does what one would expect.
But the exact same code on a page in my application hangs IE7 on the
evalJSON() line (eventually I get a "Stop running this script?"
prompt).
I would
Looks like Prototype 1.6.0.3 is conflicting with an earlier version
that has been integrated into another app I'm using - MapGuide Fusion.
Is there a way to run two different versions alongside each other?!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because yo
have you tried to remove the single quotes around the json string ?
- Original Message -
From: "gingerbbm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:28 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: evalJSON hangs IE
>
> Looks like Prototype 1.6.0.3 is
Hello.
I need a little help.
I'm developing an application using prototype & php and I want to do
the following:
In a page I have 3 forms: One containing a start calendar, one
containing a end calendar and one that allows the user to select witch
data to show on a graph.
The idea is to allow t
On Nov 13, 11:28 am, gingerbbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like Prototype 1.6.0.3 is conflicting with an earlier version
> that has been integrated into another app I'm using - MapGuide Fusion.
>
> Is there a way to run two different versions alongside each other?!
How is it conflicting? A
On Nov 13, 4:40 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How is it conflicting? Any more details?
>
No more details as yet. If only I had some way of debugging IE like I
do with Firefox (Firebug). I'm not getting any errors but the CPU
starts maxing out and eventually I get that prompt.
--~--~--
Alex Mcauley wrote:
> have you tried to remove the single quotes around the json string ?
evalJSON() is a method on String, so that doesn't work.
At this point in time I'm satisfied it's a conflict: if I remove
references to the other JavaScript (that itself references the old
Prototype code) th
On Nov 13, 11:13 am, Abel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I need a little help.
>
> I'm developing an application using prototype & php and I want to do
> the following:
>
> In a page I have 3 forms: One containing a start calendar, one
> containing a end calendar and one that a
Hi,
I'm running the exact code and do not get any IE7 hangs:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Event.observe(window, 'load', function() {
Event.observe($('btn'), 'click', function() {
var j = ' {"easting": "518353", "northi
Hey,
Kevin Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running the exact code and do not get any IE7 hangs:
[...]
> Event.observe(window, 'load', function() {
> Event.observe($('btn'), 'click', function() {
> var j = ' {"easting": "518353", "northing": "168119"} ';
> var c = j.evalJSON();
>
On Nov 13, 11:13 am, Abel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
> Seeing it's not possible to use nested forms, I need to combine the
> information of all 3 and send it as parameters.
I needed something similar some time ago. Serializing multiple forms
is as easy as merging multiple objects
Thanks for the tip but the code I posted was as a result of
meticulously removing bits of a far bigger piece of code. The JSON is
supposed to be returned by an Ajax.Request() so I assume it'll be
coming through as a string, hence the code above.
In any case, if I removed the link to the code cont
Hi there. I'm working on simple script that must work on all browsers,
which prototype supports.
There are code:
var edit = node.select('a#edit')[0];
if( edit ) {
...
}
In Firefox and Safari this works great: the variable contain
the pointer to the DOM's tag with id attribute. But in IE7
the
Shawnl,
Take a look at the Tween Effect
http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/effecttween
This should accomplish everything you are trying to do.
Cheers.
--
Robert Zotter
Zapient, LLC
Ruby on Rails Development and Consulting
http://www.zapient.com
http://www.fromjavatoruby.com
On N
I've been dynamically building a slideshow based on a list of image
filenames. I use the following code to create thumbnails:
$('placeholder').insert(new Element("img", {id:'something',
src:myImage}))
I would like to display a progress bar, so I'm going to count the
number of images loaded as th
A simple Effect.Move will do.
http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/effect-move
On Nov 12, 11:31 am, shawnl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello scriptaculous people.
>
> I am looking for an effect that will slide a div up from a fixed
> location on the page. For example, I will have a n
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Diodeus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how do I do this? I know I could create the element with the
> onload, then set the src separately later in the code, but I would
> prefer to do it all inside the new Element constructor.
>
I honestly can't see the harm in d
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:17 PM, AlannY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there. I'm working on simple script that must work on all browsers,
> which prototype supports.
>
> There are code:
> var edit = node.select('a#edit')[0];
> if( edit ) {
> ...
> }
What's node?
How to fix it?
$(node).sel
So when does it become a high priority?
On Oct 23, 5:44 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 23, 1:59 pm, laurin1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tested Prototype with 8 Beta 2? I just started and I am
> > getting some error right off the bat. Not positive they are Prototype
On Nov 13, 3:43 pm, Diodeus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been dynamically building a slideshow based on a list of image
> filenames. I use the following code to create thumbnails:
>
> $('placeholder').insert(new Element("img", {id:'something',
> src:myImage}))
>
> I would like to display a pr
I've extensively used class.create for a calendar - each week has a
class containing 7 days, also represented as objects of a class.
1 ) But the problem is it's turned out to be a bit of a memory eater
as there's quite a lot of methods on both classes. Should architecture
like this be a problem w
Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there an updated list of
browsers and versions supported by Prototype? I'm particularly interested in
slightly-older Mac-based browsers like IE5.5 and Safari 2. Thanks!
-Hector
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mess
I've create an Object in my pages script tags, something like this:
a = new A();
and when I want to call a method of a in the script which is actually
the ajax content (evaluated with .evalScripts) everything is fine. but
when the creation and the calling code, both are in the ajax contents
(sep
Hi,
I am not very knowledgeable in Javascript but I am using the Prototpye
framework in one of my projects. I am trying to integrate Google Books
Embedded Preview in the page and it doesn't work when I include the
Framework. The Javascript console in Google Chrome reports this error:
" Uncaught Ty
On Nov 14, 9:54 am, "Hector Virgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there an updated list of
> browsers and versions supported by Prototype?
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs/browse_thread/thread/37d5a3b8da4fb1c7/7f92194bee9e51bd?hl=en&ln
Thanks! This really should be on the main site, as was pointed out in the
thread back in 2007. :)
-Hector
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:19 PM, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 9:54 am, "Hector Virgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there an u
Dio,
Effect.Move is used to move the position of the div but I believe
Shawnl wants to create his own type of Blind animation.
Shawnl you can also check out the wiki for the an example of how to
create your own Effect.BlindRight
http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/effect-blinddown
--
Ehsun,
Can you post some code so we can get a better understanding of what
you are trying to accomplish.
Off the top of my head though it sounds like you may want to look into
scope binding.
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/function/bind
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/function/bindAsEventListener
On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've create an Object in my pages script tags, something like this:
>
> a = new A();
>
> and when I want to call a method of a in the script which is actually
> the ajax content (evaluated with .evalScripts) everything is fine. but
> when th
On Nov 13, 6:22 pm, bluezehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've extensively used class.create for a calendar - each week has a
> class containing 7 days, also represented as objects of a class.
>
> 1 ) But the problem is it's turned out to be a bit of a memory eater
> as there's quite a lot of meth
On Nov 13, 5:29 pm, Nilavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not very knowledgeable in Javascript but I am using the Prototpye
> framework in one of my projects. I am trying to integrate Google Books
> Embedded Preview in the page and it doesn't work when I include the
> Framework. The Java
On Nov 13, 10:30 pm, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> There are work arounds, but best to avoid eval'ing scripts altogether.
Yeah, there's a `globalEval` function scheduled for near future
releases. When running in environment that doe
On Nov 13, 7:19 pm, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 9:54 am, "Hector Virgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I doubt very much that IE 5.5 on Mac OS is supported, Safari 2 should
> be OK.
Safari 2 is actually one of the reasons why we can't use
`Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty`
Is the description correct?
prototype-1.6.0.3 line 1212
if (params = Object.toQueryString(params)) {...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this grou
It's not great style, but yes, I'm fairly certain it really does mean
to be doing an assignment there and then testing the result of the
assignment for falsity. E.g.:
params = Object.toQueryString(params);
if (params) {
Why? Did it just look like a bug to you, or were you looking into
Hi,
> 1 ) But the problem is it's turned out to be a bit of a memory eater
> as there's quite a lot of methods on both classes.
That shouldn't be a problem if you're using Class.create, it assigns
the methods to the prototypes so the methods are shared across all
instances. Are you trying to cr
55 matches
Mail list logo
