RE: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous operating system?

2020-08-21 Thread Phil Muir
You can download any older Apple operating systems from the Internet.  Done 
that here.

 
Warm regards, Phil Muir
Accessibility Training
UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
dingram...@earthlink.net
Sent: 21 August 2020 09:37
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
operating system?

Hi Nils, I first checked with apple to see if the now older operating system 
was available, but I found it not to be unless I take my system in to the 
store.  This is information that I found out.  But my question is whether 
anyone just happens to know whether this new operating system truly supports 
pro tools and other applications? I just heard that there's something new but I 
think that it is nativeaccess but i'm not sure What do you think?  Thank you 
for any information that you might have concerning my questions.


-Original Message-
>From: 'Nils Michalski' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>
>Sent: Aug 20, 2020 11:35 AM
>To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>operating system?
>
>First,
>Try to fix the issue inside your system. 
>In most cases you do not have to reinstall or go back to a previous version. 
>
>Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
>> Am 20.08.2020 um 18:17 schrieb Nick Gawronski :
>> 
>> Hi, I have been able to do this by just loging into my Apple ID and 
>> downloading the installer for the version I wish to restore to and 
>> just using directions on line on how to create an USB installation 
>> key but first make sure you backup all of your data first.  There are 
>> also programs like Super Duper and Carbon Copy Cloner that can make a 
>> bootable drive backup of your system and I find those very accessible 
>> and usable.  Nick Gawronski
>> 
>>> On 8/20/2020 6:57 AM, dingram...@earthlink.net wrote:
>>> How do you create the time machine backup so that you can restore the mac 
>>> mini back to the older operating system?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: John Covici 
>>>> Sent: Aug 20, 2020 6:27 AM
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>>>> operating system?
>>>> 
>>>> Not unless you have a time machine backup with an older OS and you 
>>>> would have to restore your whole disk back to that time machine 
>>>> backup.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:21:01 -0400,  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi list members, i'd like to know if it is possible for me to restore my 
>>>>> mac mini to the previous operating system?  I ask this because I wasn't 
>>>>> sure whether pro Tools and or other programs would work properly using 
>>>>> the most current operating system which is Catalina 10.15.6.  Thank you 
>>>>> for any information that you might have concerning this question.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/606789429.225.1597918861937%40wamui-kristoff.atl.sa.earthlink.net.
>>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
>>>> How do
>>>> you spend it?
>>>> 
>>>> John Covici wb2una
>>>> cov...@ccs.covici.com
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/m3a6ypa76f.wl-covici%40ccs.covici.com.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to 

RE: Accessibility with Pro Tools

2020-08-21 Thread Phil Muir
One final thought on this.  Not necessarily a deal breaker but if you are 
planning to work with sighted individuals or you want to demo Reaper then keep 
in mind that although you can access it, what you are doing has absolutely 
nothing to do with what is displayed visually on screen.  This means that 
sighted people can’t actually see how you are working in Reaper.

 

 

Warm regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk <mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> 
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of Steve 
Sparrow
Sent: 21 August 2020 08:43
To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
Subject: Re: Accessibility with Pro Tools

 

I have used reaper both on windows and mac, and it works very well on both 
platforms. Yes agree with phill regarding sonar. It has not been accessible for 
some years now. 

Steve

 





On 21 Aug 2020, at 6:16 am, Phil Muir mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> > wrote:

 

Sonar hasn’t been accessible since 8.5.3 and I wouldn’t recommend using it on 
Windows 10.  There’s also Samplitude Pro X Suite which is largely based on 
Sequoia.  That’s another accessible alternative on Windows and you can read 
about it here and access the Samplitude Access YouTube channel and join the VIP 
Audio E-mail list on the following website:

 

http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/

 

 

Warm regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk <mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> 
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>  
mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> > On Behalf Of 
Rory McDonald
Sent: 20 August 2020 21:11
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
Subject: Re: Accessibility with Pro Tools

 

There is a mail list for reaper, and an entire wikki on the subject as well 
with guides on getting started and what not. Not sure about sonar though, I 
take it some probably still use it though, version 8 or whatever it is. 

Rory






On Aug 20, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Michael Holmes mailto:m.richard.hol...@gmail.com> > wrote:



Pro Tools is only accessible on Mac. That being said, you have a leg up by 
being familiar with the software and terminology already. There are issues with 
third party plugins sometimes, but PT itself is insanely accessible, as are all 
Avid plugins and most of the established plugin companies like Waves and 
Izotope. Flo Tools makes everything quicker and helps with some of the few 
accessibility gaps.

 

It’ll be a learning curve, but it’s the way to go on a Mac. I was a Windows guy 
before going blind, and didn’t have the chance to use PT with eyesight. I 
always wanted to, so I’m grateful for Avid’s work.

 

If Mac isn’t an option, I hear Reaper or an old edition of Cakewalk Sonar 
should work. There are groups like this list for those softwares’ accessibility 
I think.

 

I hope this helps,

Mike






On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:39, Oran O'Neill mailto:oranone...@gmail.com> > wrote:



H

 

I am a former sighted ProTools user and have been asked to work on a project 
for TV broadcast.  I haven't used ProTools since going blind and am wondering 
how easy it is to get back on the horse from the blind perspective?  I have 
heard about Flo Tools so am wondering how accessible this makes ProTools? The 
project I would be working on is not too track heavy, it is  9 half hour TV 
programmes mainly consisting of sync, nat sound and music. 

 

Could you advise on best place to start learning  ProTools/Flo Tools and let me 
know if the Flo Tools application is mac only or can it run on PC? Also is it 
possible to do all editing/scrubbing/automation mixing and tweaking of 
paramaters for plugins etc.

 

Many thanks for your help.

 

Óran 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/50abd09a-884c-45e3-aa67-264252c0fabbn%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/50abd09a-884c-45e3-aa67-264252c0fabbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@

RE: Accessibility with Pro Tools

2020-08-20 Thread Phil Muir
Sonar hasn’t been accessible since 8.5.3 and I wouldn’t recommend using it on 
Windows 10.  There’s also Samplitude Pro X Suite which is largely based on 
Sequoia.  That’s another accessible alternative on Windows and you can read 
about it here and access the Samplitude Access YouTube channel and join the VIP 
Audio E-mail list on the following website:

 

http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/

 

 

Warm regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk <mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> 
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of Rory 
McDonald
Sent: 20 August 2020 21:11
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Accessibility with Pro Tools

 

There is a mail list for reaper, and an entire wikki on the subject as well 
with guides on getting started and what not. Not sure about sonar though, I 
take it some probably still use it though, version 8 or whatever it is. 

Rory





On Aug 20, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Michael Holmes mailto:m.richard.hol...@gmail.com> > wrote:



Pro Tools is only accessible on Mac. That being said, you have a leg up by 
being familiar with the software and terminology already. There are issues with 
third party plugins sometimes, but PT itself is insanely accessible, as are all 
Avid plugins and most of the established plugin companies like Waves and 
Izotope. Flo Tools makes everything quicker and helps with some of the few 
accessibility gaps.

 

It’ll be a learning curve, but it’s the way to go on a Mac. I was a Windows guy 
before going blind, and didn’t have the chance to use PT with eyesight. I 
always wanted to, so I’m grateful for Avid’s work.

 

If Mac isn’t an option, I hear Reaper or an old edition of Cakewalk Sonar 
should work. There are groups like this list for those softwares’ accessibility 
I think.

 

I hope this helps,

Mike





On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:39, Oran O'Neill mailto:oranone...@gmail.com> > wrote:



H

 

I am a former sighted ProTools user and have been asked to work on a project 
for TV broadcast.  I haven't used ProTools since going blind and am wondering 
how easy it is to get back on the horse from the blind perspective?  I have 
heard about Flo Tools so am wondering how accessible this makes ProTools? The 
project I would be working on is not too track heavy, it is  9 half hour TV 
programmes mainly consisting of sync, nat sound and music. 

 

Could you advise on best place to start learning  ProTools/Flo Tools and let me 
know if the Flo Tools application is mac only or can it run on PC? Also is it 
possible to do all editing/scrubbing/automation mixing and tweaking of 
paramaters for plugins etc.

 

Many thanks for your help.

 

Óran 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/50abd09a-884c-45e3-aa67-264252c0fabbn%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/50abd09a-884c-45e3-aa67-264252c0fabbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B8598766-DD4C-4936-9036-4E7CDC66C9EE%40gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B8598766-DD4C-4936-9036-4E7CDC66C9EE%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/157B3112-E7D1-4A27-94F2-6532D9FB3BDD%40rogers.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/157B3112-E7D1-4A27-94F2-6532D9FB3BDD%40rogers.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/001a01d6772e%24d1e19070%2475a4b150%24%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: 2 problems with ks888 mk2.

2020-08-16 Thread Phil Muir

I wonder if you're running the latest firmware on that keyboard?


On 16 August 2020 09:52:31  wrote:

Hi list members, I'd like to know if anyone else has had the following 
problems with ks88 mk2?  1.  The ks88 mk2 is not being recognized by the 
mac mini.  2.  When I try to turn on accessibility by pressing both the 
shift+mix buttons at the same time nothing happens.  these are the current 
problems that I'm experiencing but I've also read in ni support that other 
people have had the same problems.  I've even tried to turn off the ks88 
and turn it back on again but still nothing.  I even tried to arm a track 
in pro tools but nothing.  I'm not sure what the problem is but I didn't 
find any solution that I thaught could solve at least one of the problems.  
May be someone may be able to do a remote session just to see what i'm 
talking about.  P.S. I also would like to ask if I should try to use the 
ks88 on a windows system just to see what happens?  I'm not sure if it 
would fix the not being recognized by my mac mini but I just thaught I 
would ask.  Thank you for any information that you might have that could 
solve both of these problems.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1196610506.59.1597567946247%40wamui-cinderella.atl.sa.earthlink.net.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/173f807ce80.27de.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

2020-03-28 Thread Phil Muir
well that's good to know that it's working on other DAW software on the Mac 
side. Not good that is not working in Pro tools although you would have 
thought that should be easier to narrow down from a development point of 
view because that's just broken in one particular plug-in format.



On 28 March 2020 21:25:42 TheOreoMonster  wrote:

Its a ProTools AAX issue as The parameters are accessible in Logic and 
Reaper on the Mac with VoiceOver.



On Mar 28, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Phil Muir  
wrote:


that's really unfortunate. Sounds to me like it is a Mac OS voice-over 
thing though because all of those plug-in parameters are definitely 
accessible on the Windows platform in multiple doors.



On 28 March 2020 17:37:45 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform 
which, depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to 
parameters not responding to the accessibility API. With a control surface, 
everything works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the developer and will 
reach out to see if he can do anything about it for future releases.

Slau



On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles  wrote:
I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla delay 
plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 15. Though 
I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change any of them. Is 
anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools?

Sent from my iPhone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CC8AC63F-642A-4336-9E3A-82E20EC2D57F%40gmail.com.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1712306d2f0.27bf.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F986DD57-1309-4099-85B6-60F84B2CE424%40gmail.com.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/171230d7240.27bf.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

2020-03-28 Thread Phil Muir
that's really unfortunate. Sounds to me like it is a Mac OS voice-over 
thing though because all of those plug-in parameters are definitely 
accessible on the Windows platform in multiple doors.



On 28 March 2020 17:37:45 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform 
which, depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to 
parameters not responding to the accessibility API. With a control surface, 
everything works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the developer and will 
reach out to see if he can do anything about it for future releases.

Slau



On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles  wrote:

I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla delay 
plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 15. Though 
I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change any of them. Is 
anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools?


Sent from my iPhone

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CC8AC63F-642A-4336-9E3A-82E20EC2D57F%40gmail.com.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1712306d2f0.27bf.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Kontakt6 plug-in

2019-10-28 Thread Phil Muir
Not dissagreeing with you on this. Was just attempting to explain the 
diference between the Kontakt 5 and 6 interfaces.



On 28 October 2019 23:40:13 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Well, the instruments themselves all have their own specific interface but 
what I'm talking about is the part of the UI that doesn't change and 
remains the same. That's where the toolbar appears and one would normally 
click on various controls to achieve various results. That part of the UI 
has not changed.



On Oct 28, 2019, at 6:53 PM, Phil Muir  
wrote:


I seem to remember that the interface looks the same until you try to load 
a Kontakt 6 instrument.


On 27 October 2019 22:47:25 Slau Halatyn  wrote:


Hi Martin,
I think a couple of things have changed from version 5 to version 6 
including the ability to "add" a Kontakt library so the whole browser 
question might be irrelevant, I'm not sure. I do know that, when Kontakt 6 
came out, I verified that the macros for loading NKIs and batch resaving, 
etc. did work and the interface was largely unchanged. I'll have to revisit 
the whole question of how the browsing might have changed.

HTH,
Slau


On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:54 PM, Martin (Punky) Sopart <mailto:m...@cakewalker.de>> wrote:


Hello Slau and others!

I just imported and activated the Keyboard Maestro macro groups  for 
Kontakt plug-in.

Could I use them with the current version of Kontakt:

When e.g. pressing Control+B to get the browser status, nothing happens.
Same for Control+1.

Thanks for helping.

Best! / Martin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ACF037AD-5372-437C-985D-72065A52EAE7%40cakewalker.de 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ACF037AD-5372-437C-985D-72065A52EAE7%40cakewalker.de>.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0FDC24D4-4733-4701-8FC1-348CC3C9908A%40gmail.com 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0FDC24D4-4733-4701-8FC1-348CC3C9908A%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16e14934878.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16e14934878.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/273E883A-BB26-49F4-9A79-4F189FEBA45F%40gmail.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16e14d18de0.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Kontakt6 plug-in

2019-10-28 Thread Phil Muir
I seem to remember that the interface looks the same until you try to load 
a Kontakt 6 instrument.



On 27 October 2019 22:47:25 Slau Halatyn  wrote:


Hi Martin,
I think a couple of things have changed from version 5 to version 6 
including the ability to "add" a Kontakt library so the whole browser 
question might be irrelevant, I'm not sure. I do know that, when Kontakt 6 
came out, I verified that the macros for loading NKIs and batch resaving, 
etc. did work and the interface was largely unchanged. I'll have to revisit 
the whole question of how the browsing might have changed.

HTH,
Slau



On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:54 PM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:

Hello Slau and others!

I just imported and activated the Keyboard Maestro macro groups  for 
Kontakt plug-in.

Could I use them with the current version of Kontakt:

When e.g. pressing Control+B to get the browser status, nothing happens.
Same for Control+1.

Thanks for helping.

Best! / Martin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ACF037AD-5372-437C-985D-72065A52EAE7%40cakewalker.de 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0FDC24D4-4733-4701-8FC1-348CC3C9908A%40gmail.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16e14934878.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Pro tools accessibility for Windows

2019-09-13 Thread Phil Muir
well it would be fantastic to have Pro tools available on Windows. I think 
as many DAW options as possible on all platforms would be a fantastic thing 
for all :-)



On 13 September 2019 22:07:39 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Avid has expressed their intention to make it accessible on Windows but 
with no timeframe whatsoever. That could mean 3 ears from now, it could 
mean 8 years from now—no way to predict.



On Sep 13, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Steve Sparrow  wrote:

I wonder if there are any plans to make it accessible on windows or is it 
something that is not achievable. I know many blind people who are windows 
users who would jump at protools if it was accessible on windows. It would 
be good to see it up and running on windows one day.

Steve


On 14 Sep 2019, at 1:53 am, Phil Muir <mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>> wrote:


Pro tools is currently not accessible on Windows. If you want to work in 
Windows then you will have to use samplitude or, Reaper.


On 13 September 2019 16:17:08 Pierre PALMER <mailto:pierre.pp.pal...@gmail.com>> wrote:



Hi !
I Would like to know if there is a way to using pro tools with JAWS on 
Windows, or any other possibility for a compatibility with windows.


Thanks a lot !
Pierre

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7a17c7c3-2048-4b2e-a88a-b06a477c907b%40googlegroups.com 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7a17c7c3-2048-4b2e-a88a-b06a477c907b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16d2b54a2b0.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16d2b54a2b0.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5D557E3B-77A6-4640-89F4-EDB624CC867F%40sparrowsound.com.au 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5D557E3B-77A6-4640-89F4-EDB624CC867F%40sparrowsound.com.au?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/88651798-7905-44D1-864A-328C0E6A27DD%40gmail.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16d2c828008.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: Pro tools accessibility for Windows

2019-09-13 Thread Phil Muir
Pro tools is currently not accessible on Windows. If you want to work in 
Windows then you will have to use samplitude or, Reaper.



On 13 September 2019 16:17:08 Pierre PALMER  wrote:


Hi !
I Would like to know if there is a way to using pro tools with JAWS on
Windows, or any other possibility for a compatibility with windows.

Thanks a lot !
Pierre

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7a17c7c3-2048-4b2e-a88a-b06a477c907b%40googlegroups.com.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/16d2b54a2b0.279c.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.


Re: PT-Accessibility under windows?

2019-03-27 Thread Phil Muir
Pro Tools accessibility on Windows is currently the same as it was  last 
time you looked at it :-)



On 27 March 2019 13:03:30 Michael Kuhlmann  wrote:


Hi to the list,

somewhere, some time ago, I heard something about planed accessibility of 
Pro Tools under windows. Just for my interest, is there something new that 
can be told publicly via the list? 2 years ago I tested  the first just 
released PT  12under windows 7 with NVDA and I found it the most part 
inaccessible.


Thanks and best.

Michael

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Electronic EZX library in SD2

2019-03-07 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Martin.  Shall leave it to Slau to comment on that EZX.  I suppose I 
could potentially map up some .s20 files for that EZX and put them in the 
Superior Drummer Dropbox.  That would allow you to load in different kick, 
snares etc.  SHall have to take a look at that EZX though as I seem to 
remember that there are quite a few options in there.  As for your other 
question, no idea as have always used Latten Percussion as is ;-)



On 7 March 2019 15:34:45 "Martin \(Punky\) Sopart"  wrote:


Hi and thanks Phil!

So there is no chance for me and I guess that Slau doesn't own that stuff 
of EZX ;-)


Any idea regarding my midi mapping mail I sent before?

Best! / Martin

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Phil Muir
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:27 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Electronic EZX library in SD2

Hi Martin.  The drums for the Electronic EZX are in different locations
because there are a lot more pads on screen.  I had to take account of this
when programming up an HSC set for use in WIndows.  I doubt that Slau has
taken account of this as it is something that is unique to that EZX :-)


On 7 March 2019 14:24:31 "Martin \(Punky\) Sopart" 
wrote:

> Hello SD2-Users again!
>
> I just got the Electronic EZX.
> Here the midi mapping seams to be ok.
> But the construct tab view does not work as expected.
> Clicking e.g. Library, Drumset and instrument pads works.
> But the instrument assign buttons do not.
> Further the solo buttons act like the mute ones.
>
> What's wrong here?
> Maybe Toontrack changed something?
>
> Best! / Martin
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Electronic EZX library in SD2

2019-03-07 Thread Phil Muir
Hi Martin.  The drums for the Electronic EZX are in different locations 
because there are a lot more pads on screen.  I had to take account of this 
when programming up an HSC set for use in WIndows.  I doubt that Slau has 
taken account of this as it is something that is unique to that EZX :-)



On 7 March 2019 14:24:31 "Martin \(Punky\) Sopart"  wrote:


Hello SD2-Users again!

I just got the Electronic EZX.
Here the midi mapping seams to be ok.
But the construct tab view does not work as expected.
Clicking e.g. Library, Drumset and instrument pads works.
But the instrument assign buttons do not.
Further the solo buttons act like the mute ones.

What's wrong here?
Maybe Toontrack changed something?

Best! / Martin


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: pt sessions saved in different copies of Pro Tools?

2019-02-08 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Slau.  Yes indeed.  However in this particular instance I would imagine 
that the most important aspect of this is actually getting out the data as 
Karen works in radio so it is in fact possible that plug-ins or the lack of 
may not be an issue at all as it's possible that no plug-ins are in the 
sessions at all ;-)



On 8 February 2019 16:47:41 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Precisely my point, though. Older sessions likely have older plug-ins that 
won't exist in the current user's plug-ins folder. In some cases, they're 
RTAS or TDM. No such plug-ins have been supported since Pro Tools 11. Audio 
and edits will work fine but, depending on the age of the sessions and 
which PT version was used, some things will absolutely not translate fully.

Slau


On Feb 8, 2019, at 4:26 AM, Phil Muir  wrote:

Hey Slau.  Good point on plug-ins.  Should have mentioned that although I 
think in Karin's case she was interested in loading up data created in Pro 
Tools and getting the data out :-)


On 8 February 2019 00:19:37 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

The sessions themselves will open but it's likely that all of the plug-ins 
(or most) will be outdated and there's no way to substitute one for 
another. For example, eQ II hasn't been around since Pro Tools version 7. 
If you open a session with the old EQ II instantiated on a track, you'll be 
alerted that those plug-ins are not available and you'll have to manually 
change those plug-ins for the eQ III plug-in. Same goes for the old 
Compressor plug-in that was replaced by the Dyn III compressor, etc. So, 
while it's certainly possible to open old sessions, unless they were 
properly archived, the content will not necessarily sound the same. Without 
an archived session, one would have various degrees of success resurrecting 
old session files. Just something to keep in mind.


slau

On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:08 PM, Karen Lewellen <mailto:klewel...@shellworld.net>> wrote:


Thank you, that is terrific to know.
I have several hours of radio work all produced in pro tools saved on an 
external  hard drive.  I have been concerned that  we might lose those 
sessions   if we upgrade.

Thanks,



On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Phil Muir wrote:


Yes.


On 7 February 2019 22:40:23 Karen Lewellen <mailto:klewel...@shellworld.net>> wrote:



Hi All,
I would hope the answer would be yes given how many years people have been
using Pro Tools in the media industry.  still, can any pro tools session
be opened in the program even if  a different version from that in which
the session was created?
By which I mean, if the session was produced in a prior  version, can  it
be opened and manipulated in later ones?
Thanks,
Karen



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: pt sessions saved in different copies of Pro Tools?

2019-02-08 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Slau.  Good point on plug-ins.  Should have mentioned that although I 
think in Karin's case she was interested in loading up data created in Pro 
Tools and getting the data out :-)



On 8 February 2019 00:19:37 Slau Halatyn  wrote:

The sessions themselves will open but it's likely that all of the plug-ins 
(or most) will be outdated and there's no way to substitute one for 
another. For example, eQ II hasn't been around since Pro Tools version 7. 
If you open a session with the old EQ II instantiated on a track, you'll be 
alerted that those plug-ins are not available and you'll have to manually 
change those plug-ins for the eQ III plug-in. Same goes for the old 
Compressor plug-in that was replaced by the Dyn III compressor, etc. So, 
while it's certainly possible to open old sessions, unless they were 
properly archived, the content will not necessarily sound the same. Without 
an archived session, one would have various degrees of success resurrecting 
old session files. Just something to keep in mind.


slau


On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:08 PM, Karen Lewellen  wrote:

Thank you, that is terrific to know.
I have several hours of radio work all produced in pro tools saved on an 
external  hard drive.  I have been concerned that  we might lose those 
sessions   if we upgrade.

Thanks,



On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Phil Muir wrote:


Yes.


On 7 February 2019 22:40:23 Karen Lewellen <mailto:klewel...@shellworld.net>> wrote:



Hi All,
I would hope the answer would be yes given how many years people have been
using Pro Tools in the media industry.  still, can any pro tools session
be opened in the program even if  a different version from that in which
the session was created?
By which I mean, if the session was produced in a prior  version, can  it
be opened and manipulated in later ones?
Thanks,
Karen



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: pt sessions saved in different copies of Pro Tools?

2019-02-07 Thread Phil Muir

Yes.


On 7 February 2019 22:40:23 Karen Lewellen  wrote:


Hi All,
I would hope the answer would be yes given how many years people have been
using Pro Tools in the media industry.  still, can any pro tools session
be opened in the program even if  a different version from that in which
the session was created?
By which I mean, if the session was produced in a prior  version, can  it
be opened and manipulated in later ones?
Thanks,
Karen





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools 
Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: protools 2018-12 and mohave

2018-12-21 Thread Phil Muir
Pro Tools is only accessible for us on the Mac using Mac OS.  It doesn't work 
with VST instruments but instead uses it's own format.  If you want to use VST 
instruments then you will need to either stay in Windows and use Samplitude or 
Reaper or use compatible VST instruments on the Mac using Logic.  There are 
definitely more free VST instruments on the Windows side than there are on the 
Mac.

On 22 December 2018 07:41:05 GMT, dingram...@earthlink.net wrote:
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>>From: John André Lium-Netland 
>>Sent: Dec 21, 2018 5:42 PM
>>To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>Subject: Re: protools 2018-12 and mohave
>>
>>Hi, 
>>
>>As far as I know, it’s not a problem to install an earlier version of
>the OS when a new machine has arrived… At least not the most recent
>previous system. It’s available in the App Store. Maybe it’s also
>possible to simply restart the machine in recover mode and access the
>installer for a previous system from there?
>>
>>Best,
>>John André
>> 
>>On 21 Dec 2018, at 19:51, Jesse Kragiel 
>wrote:
>>
>>I don't do anything commercial with it, but if I did, and my system
>was functioning amazingly and stable using an older OS, I wouldn't
>change it. The issue is that the new Macs are all coming with Mojave
>preinstalled, so people buying these systems will just have to be
>patient while Avid gets things working correctly. Pro Tools is simply
>the easiest for Voiceover users to get their heads around, so it'$ just
>gonna be a thing for us. Fortunately, there's no real reason to update
>to Mojave. It adds no accessibility functionality.
>>
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>what would be the best os that we can use when using pro tools?  I'm
>trying to get as much information concerning specs because I plan to
>move to pro tools as soon as I check some other things!  I'd also would
>like to know, whether I can use instruments from gospelmusicians.com 
>in pro tools as vst instruments with pro tools!  Thank you for any
>information that you might have concerning my questions!
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Latest Avid downloads for Pro Tools Ultimate

2018-12-21 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Vic.  If you can't get the Avid download manager to play ball then you can 
always grab those files from your account on the Avid website.

On 21 December 2018 07:43:03 GMT, Victor Tsaran  wrote:
>Slightly unrelated but related...
>I am able to download app updates, however, having difficulties with
>plugin 
>updates.
>For example, clicking on either the "download" or "more information" 
>element next to each plugin, does not do anything.
>I understand XPand!2 is available free of charge to Protools users, 
>however, to the best of my ability, I am just not able to either
>download 
>it or read more information about it using Avid's download manager.
>Anyone else tried this procedure?
>
>Thanks.
>Vic
>
>
>On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 8:17:38 AM UTC-8, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gilland 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> So, you say clumsy... Is it even possible without sighted help to
>navigate 
>> the update manager to install updates? If so, general steps with
>Voiceover 
>> would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Well, after logging in, navigate to the category like, for example, 
>> Plug-ins and click once with VoiceOver. Navigate to the various
>plug-ins 
>> that reflect that there's an update available and click on the word 
>> "update." Normally, the word "update" will change to "downloading"
>and then 
>> "install." Click on the word "install" and the installer will be
>launched 
>> in the background. If the application manager doesn't respond, you
>might 
>> need to press Page down and repeat the process of clicking on the
>word 
>> "update." Rinse and repeat. It does work, albeit clumsily, as
>mentioned.
>>
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: State of the Mac

2018-11-14 Thread Phil Muir
True although if you take that rout you are breaking Apple's licencing 
agreement.

On 14 November 2018 16:51:51 GMT, Steve Martin  wrote:
>
>
>> This all seems to be predicated around the cost of hardware, to which
>I’d say there is always the Hackintosh route as an option.
>
>> On Nov 14, 2018, at 9:26 AM, Phil Muir
> wrote:
>> 
>> Took a look at PT in Windows last year. Not much has changed then
>although I guess it is possible that something had changed since last
>year.
>> 
>> On 14 November 2018 14:23:00 GMT, Steve Matzura
> wrote:
>> Anything is possible if enough time and money are poured into it.
>I've never had the opportunity to try Pro Tools in Windows, but I'd
>love to just to see what really can and/or cannot be done with it.
>Screen readers aren't what they used to be, so maybe it's getting on
>toward time to see what, if anything, is better now than it was the
>last time anyone checked, which to my recollection was years ago.
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/13/2018 12:50 PM, Phil Muir wrote:
>>> With regard to Jaws, that depends really. Have found some really
>cheap options available from venders for keeping it up to date with an
>SMA or upgrade option. Of course there are other DAW options on Windows
>such as Reaper which work with all of the screen reader options and I
>think further down the line, Samplitude will not just be a Jaws
>solution. Actually you can already get a lot done in Samplitude with
>NVDA etc but I won't go into that here because it's off topic. Still it
>would be nice to get Pro Tools accessible on the Windows platform but
>have no idea if PT could be made to work with UI Automation on Windows.
>Can't ever see that happening. Would love to be wrong though :-) 
>>> 
>>> On 13 November 2018 17:18:14 GMT, Jesse Kragiel
> <mailto:jessekrag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm sure basic things can be done with key commands, and you're
>absolutely right. It probably would take a miracle to get it working in
>Windows. Voiceover's method of interacting with elements just lends
>itself to quicker navigation. I suppose Jaws scripting could be done,
>but that particular screen reader costs as much as a mid-tier Mac Mini.
>In order to level the playing field, PT would have to be able to run on
>NVDA, or Narrator, which is becoming a pretty capable screen reader in
>its own right. If the way programs drew graphical elements was
>standardized, it probably would help a lot.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Phil Muir
><mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Personally I do wish that PT had the same access on Windows as it
>does on the Mac for the reasons you have stated below and because I
>believe in having any DAW accessible on all of the platforms where it
>is used. Can't ever see that happening though as most visually impaired
>users who use Pro Tools do this on the Mac. Have taken a look at Pro
>Tools on WIndows and I suspect that to make it accessible on the
>Windows platform would not be a trivial task. Having said that I have
>been able to achieve some basic things in Pro Tools on Windows.
>>>> 
>>>> On 13 November 2018 16:23:46 GMT, Jesse Kragiel
>mailto:jessekrag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> I'm very thankful for the level of access we get using the Mac.
>Compared with my past in Windows, I now get things done quickly and
>efficiently in Pro Tools, and love the software. I am concerned,
>however, with the state of the Mac. I realize the Mini has been
>refreshed, and Im thrilled over that, but more and more, Macs are less
>and less user serviceable. the MBP with the touch bar is just obnoxious
>without an external keyboard and dongles, and there's no way to add
>memory after the fact.Apple charges a premium for flash storage, so
>what it used to take to invest in a usable system
>which could be upgraded is just a drop in the bucket compared to what
>I'd pay to buy a new Mac. Has anyone but me considered these things,
>and does anyone but me wish PT had the level of access in Windows it
>does on the Mac?
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/

Re: State of the Mac

2018-11-14 Thread Phil Muir
Took a look at PT in Windows last year.  Not much has changed then although I 
guess it is possible that something had changed since last year.

On 14 November 2018 14:23:00 GMT, Steve Matzura  wrote:
>Anything is possible if enough time and money are poured into it. I've 
>never had the opportunity to try Pro Tools in Windows, but I'd love to 
>just to see what really can and/or cannot be done with it. Screen 
>readers aren't what they used to be, so maybe it's getting on toward 
>time to see what, if anything, is better now than it was the last time 
>anyone checked, which to my recollection was years ago.
>
>
>On 11/13/2018 12:50 PM, Phil Muir wrote:
>> With regard to Jaws, that depends really. Have found some really
>cheap 
>> options available from venders for keeping it up to date with an SMA 
>> or upgrade option. Of course there are other DAW options on Windows 
>> such as Reaper which work with all of the screen reader options and I
>
>> think further down the line, Samplitude will not just be a Jaws 
>> solution. Actually you can already get a lot done in Samplitude with 
>> NVDA etc but I won't go into that here because it's off topic. Still 
>> it would be nice to get Pro Tools accessible on the Windows platform 
>> but have no idea if PT could be made to work with UI Automation on 
>> Windows. Can't ever see that happening. Would love to be wrong though
>:-)
>>
>> On 13 November 2018 17:18:14 GMT, Jesse Kragiel 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure basic things can be done with key commands, and you're
>> absolutely right. It probably would take a miracle to get it
>> working in Windows. Voiceover's method of interacting with
>> elements just lends itself to quicker navigation. I suppose Jaws
>> scripting could be done, but that particular screen reader costs
>> as much as a mid-tier Mac Mini. In order to level the playing
>> field, PT would have to be able to run on NVDA, or Narrator,
>which
>> is becoming a pretty capable screen reader in its own right. If
>>     the way programs drew graphical elements was standardized, it
>> probably would help a lot.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Phil Muir
>> > <mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>> Personally I do wish that PT had the same access on Windows as
>it
>>> does on the Mac for the reasons you have stated below and
>because
>>> I believe in having any DAW accessible on all of the platforms
>>> where it is used. Can't ever see that happening though as most
>>> visually impaired users who use Pro Tools do this on the Mac.
>>> Have taken a look at Pro Tools on WIndows and I suspect that to
>>> make it accessible on the Windows platform would not be a
>trivial
>>> task. Having said that I have been able to achieve some basic
>>> things in Pro Tools on Windows.
>>>
>>> On 13 November 2018 16:23:46 GMT, Jesse Kragiel
>>> mailto:jessekrag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm very thankful for the level of access we get using the
>>> Mac. Compared with my past in Windows, I now get things done
>>> quickly and efficiently in Pro Tools, and love the software.
>>> I am concerned, however, with the state of the Mac. I
>realize
>>> the Mini has been refreshed, and Im thrilled over that, but
>>> more and more, Macs are less and less user serviceable. the
>>> MBP with the touch bar is just obnoxious without an external
>>> keyboard and dongles, and there's no way to add memory after
>>> the fact.Apple charges a premium for flash storage, so what
>>> it used to take to invest in a usable system which could be
>>> upgraded is just a drop in the bucket compared to what I'd
>>> pay to buy a new Mac. Has anyone but me considered these
>>> things, and does anyone but me wish PT had the level of
>>> access in Windows it does on the Mac?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: State of the Mac

2018-11-13 Thread Phil Muir
With regard to Jaws, that depends really.  Have found some really cheap options 
available  from venders for keeping it up to date with an SMA or upgrade 
option.  Of course there are other DAW options on Windows such as Reaper which 
work with all of the screen reader options and I think further down the line, 
Samplitude will not just be a Jaws solution.  Actually you can already get a 
lot done in Samplitude with NVDA etc but I won't go into that here because it's 
off topic.  Still it would be nice to get Pro Tools accessible on the Windows 
platform but have no idea if PT could be made to work with UI Automation on 
Windows.  Can't ever see that happening.  Would love to be wrong though :-) 

On 13 November 2018 17:18:14 GMT, Jesse Kragiel  wrote:
>I'm sure basic things can be done with key commands, and you're
>absolutely right. It probably would take a miracle to get it working in
>Windows. Voiceover's method of interacting with elements just lends
>itself to quicker navigation. I suppose Jaws scripting could be done,
>but that particular screen reader costs as much as a mid-tier Mac Mini.
>In order to level the playing field, PT would have to be able to run on
>NVDA, or Narrator, which is becoming a pretty capable screen reader in
>its own right. If the way programs drew graphical elements was
>standardized, it probably would help a lot.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 13, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Phil Muir
> wrote:
>> 
>> Personally I do wish that PT had the same access on Windows as it
>does on the Mac for the reasons you have stated below and because I
>believe in having any DAW accessible on all of the platforms where it
>is used. Can't ever see that happening though as most visually impaired
>users who use Pro Tools do this on the Mac. Have taken a look at Pro
>Tools on WIndows and I suspect that to make it accessible on the
>Windows platform would not be a trivial task. Having said that I have
>been able to achieve some basic things in Pro Tools on Windows.
>> 
>>> On 13 November 2018 16:23:46 GMT, Jesse Kragiel
> wrote:
>>> I'm very thankful for the level of access we get using the Mac.
>Compared with my past in Windows, I now get things done quickly and
>efficiently in Pro Tools, and love the software. I am concerned,
>however, with the state of the Mac. I realize the Mini has been
>refreshed, and Im thrilled over that, but more and more, Macs are less
>and less user serviceable. the MBP with the touch bar is just obnoxious
>without an external keyboard and dongles, and there's no way to add
>memory after the fact.Apple charges a premium for flash storage, so
>what it used to take to invest in a usable system which could be
>upgraded is just a drop in the bucket compared to what I'd pay to buy a
>new Mac. Has anyone but me considered these things, and does anyone but
>me wish PT had the level of access in Windows it does on the Mac?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/X-ktGcpGEQs/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: State of the Mac

2018-11-13 Thread Phil Muir
Personally I do wish that PT had the same access on Windows as it does on the 
Mac  for the reasons you have stated below and because I believe in having any 
DAW accessible on all of the platforms where it is used.  Can't ever see that 
happening though as most visually impaired users who use Pro Tools do this on 
the Mac.  Have taken a look at Pro Tools on WIndows and I suspect that to make 
it accessible on the Windows platform would not be a trivial task.  Having said 
that I have been able to achieve some basic things in Pro Tools on Windows.

On 13 November 2018 16:23:46 GMT, Jesse Kragiel  wrote:
>I'm very thankful for the level of access we get using the Mac.
>Compared 
>with my past in Windows, I now get things done quickly and efficiently
>in 
>Pro Tools, and love the software. I am concerned, however, with the
>state 
>of the Mac. I realize the Mini has been refreshed, and Im thrilled over
>
>that, but more and more, Macs are less and less user serviceable. the
>MBP 
>with the touch bar is just obnoxious without an external keyboard and 
>dongles, and there's no way to add memory after the fact.Apple charges
>a 
>premium for flash storage, so what it used to take to invest in a
>usable 
>system which could be upgraded is just a drop in the bucket compared to
>
>what I'd pay to buy a new Mac. Has anyone but me considered these
>things, 
>and does anyone but me wish PT had the level of access in Windows it
>does 
>on the Mac?
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Distributing my music o.t

2018-08-13 Thread Phil Muir
That's one option or Distrokid is another.

On 13 August 2018 09:08:11 BST, Ramy Moustafa  wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>I know this is out off list, but hope i can just a starting point.
>I need to start selling my music on Apple music etc.
>i found a website called Tunecore, does anyone try it? or what is the
>best thing to start with?
>thanks in advance
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Linking stereo pan controls

2018-08-13 Thread Phil Muir
Haven't tried this but I would imagine that this could be done with a control 
surface.

On 13 August 2018 01:41:36 BST, "John André Lium-Netland" 
 wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In PT, stereo tracks contains two pan pots, one for each channel. Mono
>tracks have only one. I would like to link the two panners in a stereo
>track, since this makes it easier to quickly control the stereo image
>for the track, and a must when you are going to write automation for
>pan in a stereo track.
>
>I have found that there is a feature for this inside the Output Window,
>contained in each track. Just interact with the track and press the
>Output Window button. The link button should be selected.
>
>However, when this button is selected, my pan pots are still not
>linked. I can move one of them while the other will stay at the same
>value. I think this have something with the fact that when you use
>VoiceOver, the control-option keys are held down, and for a sighted
>user, the option key makes it possible to edit one of the pan pots even
>when the link feature is on.
>
>If you have a suggestion or solution here, I’ll really appreciate to
>hear from you! ;)
>
>Best,
>John André
>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Where to store my samples?

2018-06-29 Thread Phil Muir
You can place all samples on 1 disk.  That's what I do here.  I also record
to the same disk with 0 issues.

 

Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Blatter
Sent: 29 June 2018 11:16
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: AW: Where to store my samples?

 

Hi Phil, is it ok or even recommended to have more than one sample library
on the same disc, or would it be better to have one 512GB SSD for NI
complete and another for par example vienna orchestral instruments?

Thanks

Ben

 

 

 

Von: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag
von Phil Muir
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 11:48
An: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Betreff: RE: Where to store my samples?

 

For what it is worth not running a raid system here but it all runs plenty
fast enough on Mac OS.  Got a Samsung EVO 500GB in the laptop and A Samsung
T3 external 1TB disk for samples and audio projects.

 

 

Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Blatter
Sent: 29 June 2018 05:08
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: AW: Where to store my samples?

 

Hi Steve, I think I might have found a nice multidock for SSDS made by
Blackmagic Design under Thunderbolt 2:

 

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicmultidock

 

>From what I read so far there is really no fan. The main reason against it
would be that maximum speed for one SSD is about 370m/s. but all 4 SSDS are
just separate drives and if it's gonna be to slow I still could make a raid
0 for just two SSDS which could give a bit more than 700m/s.

And it seems to be built well with internal power supply. One could daisy
chain up to 6 multidocks. There are people using it when working with
orchestra libraries. So I guess it could be a good solution.

What do you think?

 

 

Von: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag
von Steve Martin
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018 16:25
An: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Betreff: Re: Where to store my samples?

 

Raid allows for multiple drives to appear to the computer as one drive with
the sum of its storage.  For example it will allow for two 500GB drives to
appear as a 1TB drive. Tis of course a most basic explanation and there are
options where it can use one drive for the data and the other for backing up
the data so even though there is two 500gb drive in that option it will
appear as just one. I say all that to say if you plan to get a 4 bay drive
bay and want to use each of the 4 separate drives for different things, for
example, 1 drive for samples, one drive for recording to, one drive for
media etc etc, then you wouldn't want to use any of the raid options. OWC
has an excellent reputation but is not the most inexpensive either. Samsung
eve are still the SSD's all others are compared to so it's still a safe bet
to go with those. 

 

 

On Jun 28, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Benjamin Blatter 
wrote:

 

Hi all

 

Does anyone of you store your samples on SSDs in a thunderbolt enclosure? Is
a Samsung Evo 850 good enough for this? I imagine this would be the way to
go if I want to have a fast and quiet setup.

I'm looking for a thunderbolt enclosure which can hold 4 SSDs. It should be
very quiet because most of my other things are, best without fan if this is
no problem with SSDs. I have a MacBook Pro 15 from 2015 with thunderbolt 2.

But I think I may get a more powerful mac pro only for music production
after some time which probably would have thunderbolt 3, so this enclosure
should be compatible with both.

My idea would be to use individual SSDs, one for the samples, for the
projects, for temp data ...

I read about enclosures from Akitio or OWC.

Should I even bother with raid 0 for the samples or is this just wasted
effort and money for sample libraries?

I just bought NI complete 11 ultimate and am waiting for the download
instructions. Later I probably will need a serious orchestra library. So
that's why I'm asking if raid 0 is needed or not.

 

Thanks for your thoughts on this and kind regards

Ben

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to  <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"

RE: Where to store my samples?

2018-06-29 Thread Phil Muir
For what it is worth not running a raid system here but it all runs plenty
fast enough on Mac OS.  Got a Samsung EVO 500GB in the laptop and A Samsung
T3 external 1TB disk for samples and audio projects.

 

 

Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Blatter
Sent: 29 June 2018 05:08
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: AW: Where to store my samples?

 

Hi Steve, I think I might have found a nice multidock for SSDS made by
Blackmagic Design under Thunderbolt 2:

 

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicmultidock

 

>From what I read so far there is really no fan. The main reason against it
would be that maximum speed for one SSD is about 370m/s. but all 4 SSDS are
just separate drives and if it's gonna be to slow I still could make a raid
0 for just two SSDS which could give a bit more than 700m/s.

And it seems to be built well with internal power supply. One could daisy
chain up to 6 multidocks. There are people using it when working with
orchestra libraries. So I guess it could be a good solution.

What do you think?

 

 

Von: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag
von Steve Martin
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018 16:25
An: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Betreff: Re: Where to store my samples?

 

Raid allows for multiple drives to appear to the computer as one drive with
the sum of its storage.  For example it will allow for two 500GB drives to
appear as a 1TB drive. Tis of course a most basic explanation and there are
options where it can use one drive for the data and the other for backing up
the data so even though there is two 500gb drive in that option it will
appear as just one. I say all that to say if you plan to get a 4 bay drive
bay and want to use each of the 4 separate drives for different things, for
example, 1 drive for samples, one drive for recording to, one drive for
media etc etc, then you wouldn't want to use any of the raid options. OWC
has an excellent reputation but is not the most inexpensive either. Samsung
eve are still the SSD's all others are compared to so it's still a safe bet
to go with those. 

 

 

On Jun 28, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Benjamin Blatter 
wrote:

 

Hi all

 

Does anyone of you store your samples on SSDs in a thunderbolt enclosure? Is
a Samsung Evo 850 good enough for this? I imagine this would be the way to
go if I want to have a fast and quiet setup.

I'm looking for a thunderbolt enclosure which can hold 4 SSDs. It should be
very quiet because most of my other things are, best without fan if this is
no problem with SSDs. I have a MacBook Pro 15 from 2015 with thunderbolt 2.

But I think I may get a more powerful mac pro only for music production
after some time which probably would have thunderbolt 3, so this enclosure
should be compatible with both.

My idea would be to use individual SSDs, one for the samples, for the
projects, for temp data ...

I read about enclosures from Akitio or OWC.

Should I even bother with raid 0 for the samples or is this just wasted
effort and money for sample libraries?

I just bought NI complete 11 ultimate and am waiting for the download
instructions. Later I probably will need a serious orchestra library. So
that's why I'm asking if raid 0 is needed or not.

 

Thanks for your thoughts on this and kind regards

Ben

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to  <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces

2018-06-27 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Ben.  No worries :-)

On 27 June 2018 20:45:35 BST, Benjamin Blatter  wrote:
>Hi Phil
>
> 
>
>Have many thanks for your advice. And thanks for this link to the demo
>of accessing TotalMix of RME products. This is really awesome. But
>after listening to this I think I’d prefer a bit simpler setup with
>more hands on controls. But I’ll keep my Fireface UC around until it
>dies. Mine actually probably is a monday unit because I had to send it
>in for repair already two times in the last about five years because of
>burned out chips. And when I wanted to use an ADAT connection the small
>cover broke. Since then this connector is unusable. So, I just continue
>it to use on my windows pc. But I guess my device on the mac will be
>something else.
>
> 
>
>I see there are three versions of Pro Tools. I think I’ll give the free
>Pro Tools first a try and see how things are working there.
>
> 
>
>Thanks 
>
>Ben
>
> 
>
>Von: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] Im
>Auftrag von Phil Muir
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2018 10:15
>An: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>Betreff: RE: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces
>
> 
>
>Hey Ben.  I would hold on to your RME interface for a couple of
>reasons.  1: even if you decide not to use Windows for recording there
>is software that makes that interface accessible.  They are also
>working on a Mac version of that software but it’s not quite ready yet.
> You can listen to a demo of Can using the software here:
>
> 
>
>https://www.dropbox.com/s/ao7j620zaz9xe3t/OSC_Demo.m4a?dl=1
>
> 
>
>You could always put Bootcamp on that Mac and purchase a copy of
>Windows 10 Pro retail then you would have the best of both worlds and
>importantly you would be able to configure the RME because the software
>does not depend on any scripts to run although if you have a copy of
>Jaws then it would certainly work with that.
>
> 
>
>2: as accessible as Logic is on the Mac side I personally think that
>when it comes to accessibility in DAW software on the Mac, Pro tools
>wins hands down.  You can use Pro Tools without any third party add-ons
>however if you use it with Flo Tools then it becomes even more
>accessible.
>
> 
>
>3: Logic is becoming more usable on the Mac as is Reaper.  Reaper is
>relatively cheap to purchase if that is a consideration.
>
> 
>
>4: should you decide that you are more comfortable in Windows then
>there are great options such as Samplitude and the free Jaws scripts
>available on the Samplitude Access website:
>
> 
>
>http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/
>
> 
>
>BTW, using Samplitude with Jaws is absolutely nothing like using Cake
>Talking as it just works.  The scripts only provide more feedback in
>the software.
>
> 
>
>Or Reaper and its resources:
>
> 
>
>https://reaperaccessibility.com/index.php/Main_Page
>
> 
>
>As for Komplete Kontrol that wowrks on Mac and Windows and the
>accessibility is the exact same on either platform.  Anyway hope I
>haven’t given you too much information.  It’s fantastic to have so many
>DAW choices on either platform and you will be sorted no matter which
>way you decide to go.
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Regards, Phil Muir
>
>Accessibility Training
>Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-780
>Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
>E-mail:
>i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
>URL:
>www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
>
>  _  
>
>From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>Behalf Of Benjamin Blatter
>Sent: 27 June 2018 05:43
>To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>Subject: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces
>
> 
>
>Hello all
>
> 
>
>I’m a musician, composer and teacher. I got myself a mac a few months
>ago. I bought Caketalk from Dancing dots a few years ago, only to find
>out that it didn’t quiete work on my computer. Now I’d like to give
>music production on the mac a try.
>
>So, my first question here is about getting a fully accessible audio
>interface. What are you using ? I’d like to have a really professional
>device, 8 to 16 channels with digital capabilities. And the interface
>should be really accessible, including software mixer. For the last
>couple years I have an RME Fireface UC. I rely on premade presets from
>a sighted person. For my mac audio interface I’d like to have something
>I can manage myself, if this is possible at all. I don’t mind buying
>extra hardware like a midi controller for this to happen.
>
>And I actually have a secondth question : I just did a little
>experimenting with Logic Pro so far. And I was able to record a small
>test track with the in

Re: AW: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces

2018-06-27 Thread Phil Muir
competition. The Windows DAW scene changed for me in
>2016 with the introduction of accessibility for Samplitude, and
>improved accessibility for Reaper. I got into, or onto, the Mac side
>about a year later with Logic,then earlier this year with Pro Tools. By
>no means do I know any of those four DAW's well, but I *can* get some
>so-called "real work" done in them, and for me, that's enough.
>
>On 6/27/2018 12:43 AM, Benjamin Blatter wrote:
>
>Hello all
>
> 
>
>I’m a musician, composer and teacher. I got myself a mac a few months
>ago. I bought Caketalk from Dancing dots a few years ago, only to find
>out that it didn’t quiete work on my computer. Now I’d like to give
>music production on the mac a try.
>
>So, my first question here is about getting a fully accessible audio
>interface. What are you using ? I’d like to have a really professional
>device, 8 to 16 channels with digital capabilities. And the interface
>should be really accessible, including software mixer. For the last
>couple years I have an RME Fireface UC. I rely on premade presets from
>a sighted person. For my mac audio interface I’d like to have something
>I can manage myself, if this is possible at all. I don’t mind buying
>extra hardware like a midi controller for this to happen.
>
>And I actually have a secondth question : I just did a little
>experimenting with Logic Pro so far. And I was able to record a small
>test track with the integrated instruments this program offers in about
>30 minutes of first use. This was pretty amazing. But aside that I’m
>totally new and aks myself wheter I should start using logic pro or pro
>tools for my work. I got here because someone on the Dancing Dots list
>suggested me posting my audio interface question on this list.
>
>Which DAW is more accessible  out of the box ? Because I never had
>really good experience with jaws scripts using sonar I’m hoping that
>both programs could be used without any scripts which just work in a
>certain system configuration and so on.
>
>I hope I don’t sound too pesimistic and frustrated, alltough I admit
>that I was just that when I found out my purchase of Caketalking was
>for nothing after much fiddling arround at the end. But I’m willing to
>start anew on the mac. I like this OS so far very much.
>
>I’ve got a Macbook Pro 2015. And if things are working out fine and I
>need more power in order to do my things I’m considering to buy a mac
>pro, if there will be a new one eventually that is ...
>
> 
>
>So, thanks for your help and kind regards
>
>Ben
>
> 
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> 
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> 
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK (+44)1903 783-788
Mobile:
(+447968 136-246
E-mail address:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces

2018-06-27 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Ben.  I would hold on to your RME interface for a couple of reasons.  1:
even if you decide not to use Windows for recording there is software that
makes that interface accessible.  They are also working on a Mac version of
that software but it's not quite ready yet.  You can listen to a demo of Can
using the software here:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ao7j620zaz9xe3t/OSC_Demo.m4a?dl=1

 

You could always put Bootcamp on that Mac and purchase a copy of Windows 10
Pro retail then you would have the best of both worlds and importantly you
would be able to configure the RME because the software does not depend on
any scripts to run although if you have a copy of Jaws then it would
certainly work with that.

 

2: as accessible as Logic is on the Mac side I personally think that when it
comes to accessibility in DAW software on the Mac, Pro tools wins hands
down.  You can use Pro Tools without any third party add-ons however if you
use it with Flo Tools then it becomes even more accessible.

 

3: Logic is becoming more usable on the Mac as is Reaper.  Reaper is
relatively cheap to purchase if that is a consideration.

 

4: should you decide that you are more comfortable in Windows then there are
great options such as Samplitude and the free Jaws scripts available on the
Samplitude Access website:

 

http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/

 

BTW, using Samplitude with Jaws is absolutely nothing like using Cake
Talking as it just works.  The scripts only provide more feedback in the
software.

 

Or Reaper and its resources:

 

https://reaperaccessibility.com/index.php/Main_Page

 

As for Komplete Kontrol that wowrks on Mac and Windows and the accessibility
is the exact same on either platform.  Anyway hope I haven't given you too
much information.  It's fantastic to have so many DAW choices on either
platform and you will be sorted no matter which way you decide to go.

 

 

Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK +44 (0) 1903-783-780
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Blatter
Sent: 27 June 2018 05:43
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Hello and first question accessible audio interfaces

 

Hello all

 

I'm a musician, composer and teacher. I got myself a mac a few months ago. I
bought Caketalk from Dancing dots a few years ago, only to find out that it
didn't quiete work on my computer. Now I'd like to give music production on
the mac a try.

So, my first question here is about getting a fully accessible audio
interface. What are you using ? I'd like to have a really professional
device, 8 to 16 channels with digital capabilities. And the interface should
be really accessible, including software mixer. For the last couple years I
have an RME Fireface UC. I rely on premade presets from a sighted person.
For my mac audio interface I'd like to have something I can manage myself,
if this is possible at all. I don't mind buying extra hardware like a midi
controller for this to happen.

And I actually have a secondth question : I just did a little experimenting
with Logic Pro so far. And I was able to record a small test track with the
integrated instruments this program offers in about 30 minutes of first use.
This was pretty amazing. But aside that I'm totally new and aks myself
wheter I should start using logic pro or pro tools for my work. I got here
because someone on the Dancing Dots list suggested me posting my audio
interface question on this list.

Which DAW is more accessible  out of the box ? Because I never had really
good experience with jaws scripts using sonar I'm hoping that both programs
could be used without any scripts which just work in a certain system
configuration and so on.

I hope I don't sound too pesimistic and frustrated, alltough I admit that I
was just that when I found out my purchase of Caketalking was for nothing
after much fiddling arround at the end. But I'm willing to start anew on the
mac. I like this OS so far very much.

I've got a Macbook Pro 2015. And if things are working out fine and I need
more power in order to do my things I'm considering to buy a mac pro, if
there will be a new one eventually that is ...

 

So, thanks for your help and kind regards

Ben

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A way to open SOnar Sessions on mac or covert to Protools sessions?

2018-04-29 Thread Phil Muir
Interesting.  Broadcast  wav has always worked for me.  Set your from and 
through in Sonar then select all of the tracks you wish to export then choose 
broadcast wav in.   the export audio dialog and uncheck all options such as 
affects on tracks, automation on all buses tracks etc and softsynth's and audio 
tracks etc and you should be good to go.

On 29 April 2018 14:48:21 BST, Gordon Kent <dbmu...@cybernex.net> wrote:
>I've tried toe omf stuff a few times.  You don't get any automation,
>and no midi, though you can always export that separately.  And you
>need to freeze all of your soft synth tracks.  You'll do as well just
>to export all your sonar tracks as .wav files and then import them into
>pro tools.  I wish I could get the bwf time stamp stuff working but
>I've never had success with that.  
>Gord
>
>
>From: Phil Muir 
>Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2018 7:03 AM
>To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
>Subject: Re: A way to open SOnar Sessions on mac or covert to Protools
>sessions?
>
>
>No.
>
>
>On 29 April 2018 00:35:33 BST, Ramy Moustafa
><ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>Slau:Thanks so much, i read about OMF but is there a way to  open those
>sessions on mac without converting?need to access my old stuff.thanks
>in advance  On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Slau Halatyn
><slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi Ramy, There's no way to directly
>translate a session from one DAW platform to another. However, it's at
>least possible to export files so that another DAW can open a session
>with the same number of tracks and with the same region or clip
>information. If Sonar supports OMF or AAF exporting (which I believe it
>does), you can export the project from Sonar and open it in Pro Tools.
>Again, no plug-ins will transfer and most likely no automation. I've
>opened Logic projects in Pro Tools and it's at least helpful to have
>things organized the way the client originally intended and all audio
>is exactly where it needs to be. Look into OMF/AAF exporting from
>Sonar. Slau  On Apr 26, 2018, at 5:16 PM, Ramy Moustafa
><ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com> wrote:  Hi all:  I spent about 15 years,
>recording on sonar. and after moving to Protools, I Sometimes needs to
>open a sonar session to take a track or to ask for a tempo, etc. so, is
>there a way to open sonar sessions on mac? i googled it but can not
>find something, just questions, and don’t know if there is something
>that i did not find. any help will be highly abbreciated.  --  You
>received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and
>stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
>https://groups.google.com/d/optout.  --  You received this message
>because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools
>Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>-- 
>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A way to open SOnar Sessions on mac or covert to Protools sessions?

2018-04-29 Thread Phil Muir
No.

On 29 April 2018 00:35:33 BST, Ramy Moustafa  wrote:
>Slau:
>Thanks so much, i read about OMF but is there a way to  open those
>sessions on mac without converting?
>need to access my old stuff.
>thanks in advance 
>
>> On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Slau Halatyn 
>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ramy,
>> There's no way to directly translate a session from one DAW platform
>to another. However, it's at least possible to export files so that
>another DAW can open a session with the same number of tracks and with
>the same region or clip information. If Sonar supports OMF or AAF
>exporting (which I believe it does), you can export the project from
>Sonar and open it in Pro Tools. Again, no plug-ins will transfer and
>most likely no automation. I've opened Logic projects in Pro Tools and
>it's at least helpful to have things organized the way the client
>originally intended and all audio is exactly where it needs to be. Look
>into OMF/AAF exporting from Sonar.
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On Apr 26, 2018, at 5:16 PM, Ramy Moustafa
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> I spent about 15 years, recording on sonar. and after moving to
>Protools, I Sometimes needs to open a sonar session to take a track or
>to ask for a tempo, etc.
>>> so, is there a way to open sonar sessions on mac? i googled it but
>can not find something, just questions, and don’t know if there is
>something that i did not find.
>>> any help will be highly abbreciated.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: A way to open Sonar Sessions on Mac or covert to Protools sessions?

2018-04-29 Thread Phil Muir
No afraid not.  You will have to load up Sonar on a Windows machine to get this 
done or load bootcamp on to a Mac with Windows 10.

On 29 April 2018 00:34:44 BST, Ramy Moustafa <ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Phil:
>Thanks so much for this, don’t think that i will be able to transfer
>all my sonar projects to omf, it’s a very long project.
>at least, i don’t have a windows machine now, and need to access my
>sonar sessions.
>at least, is there a sonar version on mac?
>
>
>> On Apr 27, 2018, at 8:22 PM, Phil Muir
><i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> As Slau said, OMF will work.  Have use broadcast wav to get out wav
>files
>> from Sonar and simply saved out the MIDI data for a track by
>exporting it.
>> Never really bothered much with OMF in Sonar and anyway I think its
>> implementation of OMF is quite old.
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
>Behalf
>> of Ramy Moustafa
>> Sent: 26 April 2018 22:17
>> To: protools mailing list
>> Subject: A way to open SOnar Sessions on mac or covert to Protools
>sessions?
>> 
>> Hi all:
>> 
>> I spent about 15 years, recording on sonar. and after moving to
>Protools, I
>> Sometimes needs to open a sonar session to take a track or to ask for
>a
>> tempo, etc.
>> so, is there a way to open sonar sessions on mac? i googled it but
>can not
>> find something, just questions, and don't know if there is something
>that i
>> did not find.
>> any help will be highly abbreciated.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: A way to open Sonar Sessions on Mac or covert to Protools sessions?

2018-04-27 Thread Phil Muir
As Slau said, OMF will work.  Have use broadcast wav to get out wav files
from Sonar and simply saved out the MIDI data for a track by exporting it.
Never really bothered much with OMF in Sonar and anyway I think its
implementation of OMF is quite old.


-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
of Ramy Moustafa
Sent: 26 April 2018 22:17
To: protools mailing list
Subject: A way to open SOnar Sessions on mac or covert to Protools sessions?

Hi all:

I spent about 15 years, recording on sonar. and after moving to Protools, I
Sometimes needs to open a sonar session to take a track or to ask for a
tempo, etc.
so, is there a way to open sonar sessions on mac? i googled it but can not
find something, just questions, and don't know if there is something that i
did not find.
any help will be highly abbreciated.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Exporting big session to wave tracks

2018-04-22 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Slau.  Agreed :-)

On 22 April 2018 19:35:39 BST, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>These were originally single WAV files per track. He then edited them.
>If he exports the original folder of WAV files, the original, unedited
>files will import into the new session. He needs to export the files
>anew in order to reflect the edits. Either way, an export is necessary.
>Yes, it's not essential to consolidate files and, providing they are
>true BFW WAV files, they will import into the correct spot on the
>timeline but now the person at the other end needs to account for
>multiple clips with the same name and different numbers importing to
>separate tracks rather than multiple clips on the same track. To me,
>it's leaves less room for error to consolidate all of the clips, select
>the whole timeline, export and have 15 WAV files to import to 15 tracks
>as originally intended.
>Best,
>Slau
>
>> On Apr 22, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Phil Muir
><i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Slau. I hear you. On the other hand have received files here from
>clients that were exactly as you described E.G. multiple clips of
>vocals but because Pro Tools wav files are broadcast wav then it didn't
>matter at all as they imported into the timeline in Samplitude or Sonar
>and lined up perfectly.
>> 
>> On 22 April 2018 19:08:54 BST, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> No, he edited the files and needs to export them rather than simply
>forwarding the original wAV files.
>> 
>>> On Apr 22, 2018, at 12:16 PM, Phil Muir
><i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
><mailto:i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> No you don't. Simply supply the folder that contains all of the wave
>files to your friend and he can import those broadcast wav files into
>Pro Tools.
>>> 
>>> On 22 April 2018 16:59:45 BST, Ramy Moustafa
><ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com <mailto:ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> I need to export my session to waves, to give them to my friend that
>is not using Protols.
>>> so, i can remember that i can select the tracks and press
>cmd+shift+K to export, but it’s not working.
>>> don’t know if am right or wrong. but it’s not working.
>>> i press VO+Tab then hit CMD+Shift+K but nothing happened.
>>> can anyone tell me how please?
>>> thanks in advance 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
><https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
><https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Exporting big session to wave tracks

2018-04-22 Thread Phil Muir
No you don't.  Simply supply the folder that contains all of the wave files to 
your friend and he can import those broadcast wav files into Pro Tools.

On 22 April 2018 16:59:45 BST, Ramy Moustafa  wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>I need to export my session to waves, to give them to my friend that is
>not using Protols.
>so, i can remember that i can select the tracks and press cmd+shift+K
>to export, but it’s not working.
>don’t know if am right or wrong. but it’s not working.
>i press VO+Tab then hit CMD+Shift+K but nothing happened.
>can anyone tell me how please?
>thanks in advance 
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OT:ni komplete kontrol and Omnisphere 2 nks issues...

2018-03-18 Thread Phil Muir
Well not sure if you are a Samplitude user but Steve has scripted the interface 
for that and stylus and you can purchase those scripts as add-ons to the free 
Samplitude package.

On 17 March 2018 18:59:13 GMT+00:00, Cameron Strife  
wrote:
>Hi everybody. Sorry if this is off topic but the native instruments
>komplete kontrol list seems to have no traffic.
>
>I recently purchased the ni kontrol s88 keyboard which included
>komplete select 11. I also purchased Omnisphere 2 as well as a
>Omnisphere nks package from a third party which is supposed to give
>one access to almost all of the Omnisphere 2 presets using their Ni
>Kontrol keyboard and the Komplete plug in in your daw.
>
>I was really excited to get this up and running but I'm having some
>issues. Hopefully someone on here will have a solution!
>
>I bought everything besides the nks package from sweetwater so I had
>them remote into my machine where the tech support guy proceeded to
>register/install the komplete select package as well as Omnisphere 2.
>
>So, the good news first.
>
>when I load komplete kontrol in my daw, I can browse the various
>komplete select libraries like drumlab, massive, the gentlemen,
>reactor, and west Africa etc and load patches no problem.
>
>Now the bad news...
>
>Omnisphere 2 however is nowhere to be found. The sweetwater tech
>support guy said that it does show up as an available plug in in
>komplete kontrol so I don't know what the issue is here...
>
>I placed the correct folders into the presets, images, and dist
>database directories and had someone rescan the plug ins and library
>directories but no luck. When I browse catagory or product using the
>keyboard, Omnisphere is simply not there.
>
>While I love the speech enabled browsing on the keyboard, it's
>frustrating that nothing is accessible in native access or komplete
>kontrol even if I use the jaws cursor and OCR etc.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Finally, I am a new Ni Komplete user so sorry if this is a basic
>question...
>
>Even if I had one preset loaded, I'm getting a nasty brick wall
>limiting effect. I looked on a forum and it said that the volume on
>the master bus may have been set above 0db which could cause this to
>happen.
>
>I'm not having luck with the komplete kontrol window so is this
>something I can change using the komplete keyboard itself?
>
>Track volume and master bus volume in my daw don't effect this one way
>or another and no, I have no compressor or limiter on the master bus
>for example.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Cameron.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Dropbox question

2018-03-06 Thread Phil Muir
Yes indeed.  Changing that will allow access to the folder on Windows.  Down to 
Slau or Vinny to fix that :-)

On 6 March 2018 13:26:20 GMT+00:00, "Martin (Punky) Sopart" 
<m...@cakewalker.de> wrote:
>Yes, perfect.
>Isn't there an "and sighn" in the name?
>Could someone - kind of admin - change that?
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of Chi Kim
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 2:22 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Dropbox question
>> 
>> My suspicion that it's because all MacOS, Android, and iOS are Linux
>based.
>> 
>> Just speculating, but that particular folder must have either some
>> character in its name not permitted in Windows, or properties that
>are
>> not allowed in Windows.
>> 
>> 
>> Chi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/6/2018 8:11 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart wrote:
>> > Yes, but why?
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> >> On Behalf Of Phil Muir
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 1:52 PM
>> >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> >> Subject: Re: Dropbox question
>> >>
>> >> What is fascinating about this is those folders not showing up on
>Windows
>> >> but they do also show up on Android.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 6 March 2018 12:47:38 GMT+00:00, Chi Kim
>> <chigook...@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>   Martin,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>   Iphone is the correct one.
>> >>
>> >>   Accessmtech.com has all the tutorials from Dropbox under the Pro
>> >> Tools
>> >>   category.
>> >>
>> >>   Except one for iLok license manager which is under other
>category.
>> >>
>> >>   Chi
>> >>
>> >>   On 3/6/2018 5:17 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Hello all!
>> >>
>> >>When browsing the PT Access Dropbox folder with the
>> >> iPhone app, the first
>> >>sub folder ist the one named "Demos, Tutorials etc".
>> >>Doing the same under Windows, the "Demos..." sub folder is
>> >> not there.
>> >>
>> >>Which version is the correct one?
>> >>
>> >>Thanks in advance and best! / Martin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my
>brevity.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> >> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> .
>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Dropbox question

2018-03-06 Thread Phil Muir
What is fascinating about this is those folders not showing up on Windows but 
they do also show up on Android.

On 6 March 2018 12:47:38 GMT+00:00, Chi Kim  wrote:
>Martin,
>
>
>Iphone is the correct one.
>
>Accessmtech.com has all the tutorials from Dropbox under the Pro Tools 
>category.
>
>Except one for iLok license manager which is under other category.
>
>Chi
>
>On 3/6/2018 5:17 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart wrote:
>> Hello all!
>>
>> When browsing the PT Access Dropbox folder with the iPhone app, the
>first
>> sub folder ist the one named "Demos, Tutorials etc".
>> Doing the same under Windows, the "Demos..." sub folder is not there.
>>
>> Which version is the correct one?
>>
>> Thanks in advance and best! / Martin
>>
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Test

2018-03-05 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Steve.  Your question came through.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steve Matzura
Sent: 05 March 2018 09:27
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Test

Sorry for the test message. I have posted a question but never saw it 
come through. If this one does, I'll re-post.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Protools vs Logic Pro, accessibility and productivity

2018-02-06 Thread Phil Muir
Slau wrote: I believe that the only person truly qualified to give the
fullest answer to this question is Chi Kim. Chi's primary DAW for years has
been Logic. However, Chi has also been a Windows user and is familiar with
the offerings on that side of the fence. More important, he's quite well
versed in Pro Tools. I'd say he's perhaps equally knowledgeable on both
platforms.

 

Phil replied: possibly although don't think Chi has dug into Samplitude on
Windows and not sure how much of a Reaper user he is either.  There in lies
the problem for any of us who work in multiple DAW's.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 06 February 2018 15:20
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: Protools vs Logic Pro, accessibility and productivity

 

Hi Victor,

 

I believe that the only person truly qualified to give the fullest answer to
this question is Chi Kim. Chi's primary DAW for years has been Logic.
However, Chi has also been a Windows user and is familiar with the offerings
on that side of the fence. More  important, he's quite well versed in Pro
Tools. I'd say he's perhaps equally knowledgeable on both platforms. while I
consider myself an experienced Pro Tools user, I'm really not at all
acquainted with Logic. Despite owning it and poking around in it, I have
virtually no true hands-on experience using it in any meaningful way. That
said, I've observed others and how they get around the interface and I base
my comments on this experience.

 

Recent versions of Pro Tools, especially the latest, are very accessible
right out of the box. The two main windows, the Mix and Edit windows, are
simple and offer channel-strip type groupings of controls aside from the
toolbar in the Edit window, which is just laid out in a horizontal line of
clusters. The Mix and Edit windows share a table of track list and groups
list and the Edit window can also display a clips list. That is essentially
the entirety of the interface with only two levels of "interaction as far as
VoiceOver is concerned. In fact, apart from the insert and sends sub groups
in each channel strip, I can't think of an instance where one has to drill
down more than one level to get to anything in any window in Pro Tools. To
me, it seems like Logic requires more jumping around and drilling of
interactions to accomplish similar tasks.

 

What Flo Tools has done is dramatically increase efficiency by reporting
things like how many tracks are showing, how many are hidden, what's muted
soloed or record-enabled, etc. what the current start, end and length values
are, etc. Largely, the kind of information that Windows users were used to
getting in Sonar, for example. Regarding Flo Tools, this is just barely
scratching the surface of what it can now do for Pro Tools. To me, the
current state of access in Pro Tools along with Flo Tools,  is unparalleled.
Of course, we all know that other DAWs are quite useable and Logic offers a
decent degree of access. However, it's not yet at the level of Pro Tools
with Flo Tools. Ah, one more qualification: in my opinion, the greatest
access to Pro Tools, even with Flo Tools, is gained by the use of a control
surface. This is not to say that one cannot access everything without a
surface but the degree to which and speed with which one can access things
is simply hands down faster with a surface and I would venture to say that's
true for a blind user using any workstation out there. So, let's say that
factor is a given but I think it's worth mentioning.

 

If anybody can help get Logic to a higher level of accessibility, it'll be
Chi. The issues that Logic has are things like windows not being titled in
ways that are conducive to scripting the UI. Image recognition helps but is
still a bit quirky and not 100% reliable.

 

My sighted colleagues who use both Logic and Pro Tools virtually all agree
that they like Logic for composition and its sounds and Pro Tools for its
editing and mixing environment. With the advent of Komplete Kontrol and the
MIDI editing enhancements built into Pro Tools, to me, I don't feel any lack
of MIDI or virtual instrument capabilities. It's clear that some other DAWs
have more advanced or flexible MIDI implementation but that's the kind of
thing that people who are MIDI and VI-based composers care most about. I use
plenty of MIDI and virtual instruments and the degree to which I can edit
MIDI now, even on the fly, is way more than I even need. That said, a person
trying to compose and mix EDM, and I mean a blind user here, would have a
challenge on their hands when it comes to certain aspects of that type of
production. That has more to do with the interfaces of the virtual
instruments, however, and that's the area where every DAW poses a challenge
for blind users.

 

I've been openly accused of being both a Mac and Pro Tools snob. This mostly
comes from people who are equally snobbish about Windows and other DAWs
while proclaiming 

RE: Protools vs Logic Pro, accessibility and productivity

2018-02-06 Thread Phil Muir
No doubt about it.  With regard to accessibility on the Mac in DAW software
even without Flo Tools which takes it to another level, Pro Tools wins hands
down.  Also they have done a ton of cool stuff in Pro Tools 2018 with regard
to MIDI which is very cool indeed!!

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Victor Tsaran
Sent: 06 February 2018 06:25
To: Pro Tools Accessibility
Subject: Protools vs Logic Pro, accessibility and productivity

 

Hello all!

Please please no flame wars!

I would really like to hear from expert users who used both Logic and
Protools with VoiceOver on Mac OS. To be more precise, I mean the
Flotools/Protools combination vs Flogic/Logic one.

After reading various release notes on Flotools.org, I came to conclusion
that protools combined with Flotools offers an unparalleled productivity and
efficiency with VoiceOver compared to that of Logic. Of course, you can deal
with the quirks of the latter, but judging from the feature set of Flotools,
querying, editing and manipulating the audio content in Protools is much
faster than in Logic Pro.

 

Yes, I understand the difference between two DAWs. The purpose of this
message is to affirm my conclusions, especially from users who are experts
in using both.

 

Would you agree with my observations above? Are there any remaining weak
points in Protools as far as accessibility is concerned?

Thanks for any pointers, tutorials, podcasts, etc.

Vic

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: new features and shortcuts in the new Pro Tools 2018.1

2018-01-27 Thread Phil Muir
Slau wrote: My understanding, when I brought this up around 2 years ago, was
that it simply didn't work with bars and beats. I did wonder, however, if it
couldn't be facilitated by pressing asterisk then plus first and then minus
and the bars to have PT essentially recognize that it's about to receive a
number entry but, while it's waiting, if a minus key is pressed, it's made
aware that this minus, which was preceded by a plus, is meant to designate
an offset rather than a bar number. To me, it makes perfect sense but, then
again, maybe there's a good reason why they can't do that or why it wouldn't
work logically.

Phil replied: from a programmers stand-point I can see some potential issues
with this.  E.G. how  long would you have PT wait for the next input etc.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 27 January 2018 02:01
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: new features and shortcuts in the new Pro Tools 2018.1

My understanding, when I brought this up around 2 years ago, was that it
simply didn't work with bars and beats. I did wonder, however, if it
couldn't be facilitated by pressing asterisk then plus first and then minus
and the bars to have PT essentially recognize that it's about to receive a
number entry but, while it's waiting, if a minus key is pressed, it's made
aware that this minus, which was preceded by a plus, is meant to designate
an offset rather than a bar number. To me, it makes perfect sense but, then
again, maybe there's a good reason why they can't do that or why it wouldn't
work logically. I'll run it by them again.
Cheers!
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 7:05 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart 
wrote:
> 
> Hello Slau!
> 
> Ah ok, of corse I'm working with bars etc.
> Thanks for pointing out.
> I understood the manual that it is also possible.
> 
> Best! / Martin
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:47 PM
>> To: PTAccess List 
>> Subject: Re: new features and shortcuts in the new Pro Tools 2018.1
>> 
>> Hi Martin,
>> 
>> Actually, it does work. I did it just now. Perhaps what you're thinking
of is
>> that it doesn't work when you're in bars and beats. In that case, a minus
in
>> front of the bar number would assume there are negative count-in bars
>> before bar 1, which is a common thing. I've pointed this out and asked if
it
>> might be possible to somehow move backwards by a fixed number of bars
>> with a key sequence but that hasn't been tackled yet. As for minutes and
>> seconds, the sequence does work.
>> Cheers,
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On Jan 26, 2018, at 2:02 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Slau!
>>> 
>>> Sounds very interesting.
>>> Thanks for supporting us over there.
>>> 
>>> Maybe you could ask for another all time bug.
>>> I reported it several times to Avid.
>>> 
>>> Moving e.g. 7 bars forward by pressing Numpad-Star, Numpad-Plus,
>> Numpad-7, Numpad-Enter works great.
>>> But the opposed direction - using Numpad-Minus instead of Numpad-Plus -
>> does not work at all but is still in the Pro Tools manual.
>>> 
>>> Best! / Martin
 -Original Message-
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
 Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:28 PM
 To: PTAccess List 
 Subject: new features and shortcuts in the new Pro Tools 2018.1
 
 There are a bunch of new features and shortcuts in Pro Tools 2018.1
 announced today at NAMM. Yes, the version numbers are different now
>> and
 reflect year dot month of release. Anyway, below is  a brief look at
the
>> new
 shortcuts and their functions but first, the big news:
 
 The track record button now accurately reports when it is selected. No
>> more
 having to read the button multiple times to verify whether it's armed
or
>> not
 because of it flashing on and off. The same applies to the Global
Record
 button in the Transport. This has been an issue from day one and I
asked
>> that
 this be made a priority fix last time I visited Avid and it went
through a few
 iterations in beta before they got it right but they did nail it. Yay
for fixes!
 
 
 Designate current playlist as target playlist
 Command+Shift+right arrow
 Any playlist can now be designated as the target playlist to which
clips or
 selections from any other playlist can be copied or moved. When a
playlist
>> is
 selected, pressing Command+Shift+Right Arrow designates that playlist
as
 the target playlist.
 
 Copy selection to target playlist
 Shift+Option+up arrow
 Let's say you've  created a track called Vocal and you've recorded a
>> number
 of takes on playlists. Let's assume you have four recorded takes on

RE: Focusrite audio interfaces.

2018-01-22 Thread Phil Muir
Think this is on the Mac side.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: 22 January 2018 15:42
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's great to
know!

Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation ones?

At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>I use the focusrite scarlette
>, It is accessible. It is 599
>Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>  wrote:
> >
> > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Which 
> are accessible to us?
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
cats." - Albert Schweitzer 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Thunderbolt Ports

2018-01-11 Thread Phil Muir
The specks for that machine will tell you if you Google that Mac.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andre Jarreau
Sent: 11 January 2018 18:43
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Thunderbolt Ports

 

Hi everyone.  Does anyone know how to determine if TB ports on a Mac Book
Pro are TB2 or TB3?  Called Apple twice and one tech said it was TB2 then
another tech said TB3.

 

I have a Mac Book Pro 15, late 2016.  Any help appreciated.

Thanks

Andre

 


 
 

Virus-free.
 www.avast.com 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Samplitude Pro X3 Suite Offer Extended Until The 4th Of January 2018

2018-01-01 Thread Phil Muir
Hey all!

 

If you work at all in Windows then the following may be of interest to you.
In case you missed it you can still purchase the full version of Samplitude
Pro X3 Suite until the 4th of January 2018 for a very special price of
£114.99, 149 euros or 149 dollars.  The inclusion of Sound Forge Pro 11 in
the package, mastering tools, analogue suite, tons of softsynths and
plug-ins, DDP import and export is worth the cost of that alone.  Links
follow:

 

UK web page:

 

http://www.magix.com/index.php?id=24877=38_source=newsletter_mediu
m=mail_campaign=2017_50_SPsut_music_CRG_GB_content=SPsut_term=_4
384=7YKQjhOy2axFASZJ

 

US web page:

 

http://www.magix.com/index.php?id=24739=52=9wsnAiYJ77GWu8YE_sour
ce=newsletter_medium=mail_content=spsut_campaign=US_48_spsut

 

Euros web page:

 

http://www.magix.com/index.php?id=24739=111

 

Jaws scripts to use Samplitude:

 

http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/ 

 

BTW, feel free to pass this offer along to any other E-mail lists that may
be interested.

 

 

Regards, Phil Muir

Accessibility Training
Telephone: UK+44-1903-783-788
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Is Flotools free?

2017-12-29 Thread Phil Muir
Flowtools is free however in order to use that set of macros you will need
to purchase Keyboard Maestro which has a 30 day demo.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rory McDonald
Sent: 29 December 2017 03:11
To: PTAccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Is Flotools free?

 

Hey, I have finally installed pro tools. However, I don't seem to have the
demo session anywhere to play around with. I am also kind of confused, on
flotools.org it says it is free software, but on the readme on the GitHub
page it says you need to pay after a 30 day trial. Is this the case? If so,
how much is it? I also saw something about a flo numpad that could create a
virtual numpad using keys on the keyboard. Is this any good? I wonder if
that would save me having to get a full size apple keyboard.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Questions about pro tools when starting out

2017-12-27 Thread Phil Muir
Agreed.  The Windows keyboard will work fine.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steve Sparrow
Sent: 26 December 2017 22:39
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Questions about pro tools when starting out

yeah agree chuck. 

I can't say enough about protools with speech. I learned to use PT this way.
Things have certainly progressed with newer versions, and flo tools has made
things so much quicker and easier. But it's probably good to know how to use
protools without flo tools first incase something goes a miss with keyboard
Mystro. 
I think it would be very difficult to use protools without a Num pad. I'd
get a full size mac keyboard if it were me, But not sure about the windows
keyboard, it might work but never tried this.
Steve


> On 26 Dec 2017, at 11:40 pm, CHUCK REICHEL
 wrote:
> 
> Amen Ricky!
> Full size quarty keyboard # 1!
> Pro Tools with speech absolutely!
> The nice thing about Pro Tools is the keyboard commands don't change they
just ad new ones with the new features
> Thats the cool thing about PT since I started using it in 2001. :)
> 
> Chuck
> "God does not play dice with the universe"
> "Albert Einstein'
> 
> 
> On Dec 26, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Ricky Prevatte wrote:
> 
>> Get Protools with speech he will not regret that nor will you regret
getting a number pad. I think they are musts.
>> 
>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154
>> 
>>> On Dec 26, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Rory McDonald  wrote:
>>> 
>>> How much can I do without a number pad, is it even needed? Like I
understand that it would make things easier but is there other ways to do
things you'd normally do with the number pad?
>>> 
 On Dec 25, 2017, at 4:25 PM, John Covici  wrote:
 
 You can certainly  use the windows keyboard, the command and options
 keys will be reversed, but otherwise there is no really bad
 consequence.  I think the tutorials are still OK for beginners, some
 things have changed, but to start out they seem fine to me.
 
 On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:17:06 -0500,
 Rory McDonald wrote:
> 
> Hey all! I got pro tools as a christmas present! I don't have it yet,
but its coming in a few days, the ilock. I will get the software online.
However, I do not yet have a full size mac keyboard, so do not have a num
pad. I have my pc keyboard for my desktop, but that, i imagine, wouldn't
work as its ment for windows. Is there simple things I can do when just
starting out that don't require a num pad? Keep in mind also that I know
basically nothing about how to use pro tools, and am still debating whether
to buy the pro tools with speech tutorials as i've heard they are no longer
worth it for learning since so much has changed. Are they something I should
buy? Or is there too many changes to bother? I imagine they'll still be good
for beginners right?

> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
 
 -- 
 Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
 How do
 you spend it?
 
  John Covici wb2una
  cov...@ccs.covici.com
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit 

RE: Superior Drummer versions

2017-11-30 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Pete.  You can get the latest version of Superior Drummer 2 witch is
2.4.4 from the Toontrack website.  Superior Drummer 3 is currently
inaccessible.  Slau and I have made them aware of the issues and it's down
to the fact that they wrote SD3 using the Juce platform.  Unfortunately
there is no accessibility API available in the Juce platform so unless this
is addressed in the future I can't see SD3 becoming accessible any time
soon.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Bosher
Sent: 30 November 2017 12:21
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Superior Drummer versions

Hi All,


I have SD 2 on DVD which I've been using under Windows.


When I try to install it on the Mac it refuses, saying  I need OS 10.4 
or higher.  I'm actually running Sierra.  Question:  will the last 
version of SD2 run under Sierra?   If so, then I guess I can get this 
via the Product Manager.  If not, then from recent messages I see that 
there are doubts about the accessibility of SD3, so in short, what's my 
best option for SD with PT?


Best,


Peter


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Track bounce question

2017-11-24 Thread Phil Muir
Well if you are happy with the data in the wav file of the vocal track,
simply navigate to the Audio Files folder inside the name of the session
folder and copy the wave file out.  You can then re import it later once the
clicks have been removed.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 24 November 2017 13:24
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Track bounce question

Hello all!

Having a vocal track with some unwanted clicks an audio engineer is willing
to remove that clicks.

What is the most common way to export / bounce that single track out of a
session for external editing and reimporting again.

Thanks for your help and regards! / Martin


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

2017-11-23 Thread Phil Muir
No idea Chris.  Would have expected him to put it up on a website somewhere
with instructions with regard to configuring it.  Then folks could get on
and sort things out.  Shall put Can's E-mail at the bottom of this message.
Anyway here's the  latest for all of you:

"  Hello friends,

I'm here. I moved my house to an other city and getting maried as well.
Sorry for the delay. Will help you as soon as possible. There are many new
things in the new city and workplace so need to set for my life, it takes
extra time that I planned.

Firstly, I will help to Brian to configure his device as I promised, after
that, you can send  a private email.
For my records, please send your emails as soon as possible, so we can
pesify a time."

Can's E-mail address is:

canki...@gmail.com

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: 23 November 2017 16:02
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

Oh shoot Phil. So he's not even going to make it public, after he 
demonstrated it to a bunch of us on TeamTalk?
It was very impressive and gave 100% access to the TotalMix FX application.

I hope anybody who spent good money on an RME interface, thinking 
they would get access, was able to get a copy of the program from him.

At 04:49 AM 11/23/2017, you wrote:
>Would love to but Can hasn't put it on a website anywhere.  Further more,
he
>is about to get married so I doubt I would be able to get it for you even
if
>I did drop him an E-mail.  I don't have it here as still using my Saffire
>Liquid 56 and Pro 24 with my HSC set on Windows 10 so not required here.
>Shall drop him a note in a couple of weeks and see if I can persuade him to
>put it up somewhere so that everyone can get access to it.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf
>Of TheOreoMonster
>Sent: 22 November 2017 22:41
>To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>Subject: Re: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question
>
>Can you point me to where one can get a copy of this OSC application for
>windows accessibility?
>This is why stuff like the Arturia AudioFuse and the PreSonus Quantum is
>promising. All the routing is done in the DAW as the latency is low enough
>now that we won't need  stuff like the total mix app to keep latency down.
>Of course in the case of stuff like the x32 or other mixers with fx and
>internal routing for live sound etc. OSC still makes sense if its
>implemented. UAD on the other hand, if their latency figures are what they
>are reporting, and their plug ins can already see which UAD cards are
>installed, why not just enable the native plug ins to activate Unison  from
>with in the DAW and ditch the UAD console. Of course if they did that we
>would still need UAD  to make activating demos or purchase licenses
>accessible.
>
> > On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> >
> > Implement accessibility for Mac and Windows folks you mean? Not all
blind
>audio professionals are using the Mac.
> >
> > Another option would be to request support for OSC, Open Sound Control
>protocol, similar to how RME have done with their hardware, since we now
>have a utility to access that with our Windows screen readers - hopefully
>soon to be ported to the Mac as well.
> >
> > In the RME case, we can now fully access the hardware, the DSP, set up
all
>the routing etc. in RME's extensive application called TotalMix FX.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > At 05:17 PM 11/22/2017, you wrote:
> >> Hi Nate,
> >> No not yet!
> >> Everybody Join me in emailing Scott Greiner the product manager for
>Apollo, <sgrei...@uaudio.com>  again.
> >> Bill Putnam only has to say to  Scott Greiner implement VoiceOver
>accessibility for the UA console app and bang its done!
> >>
> >> The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
> >> Chuck
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>> I went a head and pulled the trigger on an Apollo blackface 8P with
the
>free satellite. The Sweet water took off around $500 so I said, what the
>heck.
> >>> Question, I know that the plugins can be run natively, but can the UA
>concil be accessed with voice over yet?
> >>> Any thoughts are appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nate Kile,
> >>> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
> >>> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low
vision/virtual
>instruction for schools
> >>> Also Private training to your needs
> >>> 907-444-3707
> >>> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC,
Office
>products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes:
>www.yourtechvision.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this 

RE: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

2017-11-23 Thread Phil Muir
Would love to but Can hasn't put it on a website anywhere.  Further more, he
is about to get married so I doubt I would be able to get it for you even if
I did drop him an E-mail.  I don't have it here as still using my Saffire
Liquid 56 and Pro 24 with my HSC set on Windows 10 so not required here.
Shall drop him a note in a couple of weeks and see if I can persuade him to
put it up somewhere so that everyone can get access to it.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of TheOreoMonster
Sent: 22 November 2017 22:41
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

Can you point me to where one can get a copy of this OSC application for
windows accessibility? 
This is why stuff like the Arturia AudioFuse and the PreSonus Quantum is
promising. All the routing is done in the DAW as the latency is low enough
now that we won't need  stuff like the total mix app to keep latency down.
Of course in the case of stuff like the x32 or other mixers with fx and
internal routing for live sound etc. OSC still makes sense if its
implemented. UAD on the other hand, if their latency figures are what they
are reporting, and their plug ins can already see which UAD cards are
installed, why not just enable the native plug ins to activate Unison  from
with in the DAW and ditch the UAD console. Of course if they did that we
would still need UAD  to make activating demos or purchase licenses
accessible. 
 
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> 
> Implement accessibility for Mac and Windows folks you mean? Not all blind
audio professionals are using the Mac.
> 
> Another option would be to request support for OSC, Open Sound Control
protocol, similar to how RME have done with their hardware, since we now
have a utility to access that with our Windows screen readers - hopefully
soon to be ported to the Mac as well.
> 
> In the RME case, we can now fully access the hardware, the DSP, set up all
the routing etc. in RME's extensive application called TotalMix FX.
> 
> Chris
> 
> At 05:17 PM 11/22/2017, you wrote:
>> Hi Nate,
>> No not yet!
>> Everybody Join me in emailing Scott Greiner the product manager for
Apollo, <sgrei...@uaudio.com>  again.
>> Bill Putnam only has to say to  Scott Greiner implement VoiceOver
accessibility for the UA console app and bang its done!
>> 
>> The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I went a head and pulled the trigger on an Apollo blackface 8P with the
free satellite. The Sweet water took off around $500 so I said, what the
heck.
>>> Question, I know that the plugins can be run natively, but can the UA
concil be accessed with voice over yet?
>>> Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nate Kile,
>>> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
>>> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual
instruction for schools
>>> Also Private training to your needs
>>> 907-444-3707
>>> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office
products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes:
www.yourtechvision.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to
ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegro
ups.com.
>>> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to
ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegro
ups.com.
>> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats."
- Albert Schweitzer 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To 

RE: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

2017-11-23 Thread Phil Muir
Agreed.  I jump between both OS's Pro Tools on the Mac and Samplitude and
Reaper on Windows and want to see accessibility for this across the board.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: 22 November 2017 22:27
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

Implement accessibility for Mac and Windows folks you mean? Not all 
blind audio professionals are using the Mac.

Another option would be to request support for OSC, Open Sound 
Control protocol, similar to how RME have done with their hardware, 
since we now have a utility to access that with our Windows screen 
readers - hopefully soon to be ported to the Mac as well.

In the RME case, we can now fully access the hardware, the DSP, set 
up all the routing etc. in RME's extensive application called TotalMix FX.

Chris

At 05:17 PM 11/22/2017, you wrote:
>Hi Nate,
>No not yet!
>Everybody Join me in emailing Scott Greiner the product manager for 
>Apollo, <sgrei...@uaudio.com>  again.
>Bill Putnam only has to say to  Scott Greiner implement VoiceOver 
>accessibility for the UA console app and bang its done!
>
>The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
>Chuck
>
>
>On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote:
>
>>Hello everyone,
>>I went a head and pulled the trigger on an Apollo blackface 8P with 
>>the free satellite. The Sweet water took off around $500 so I said, 
>>what the heck.
>>Question, I know that the plugins can be run natively, but can the 
>>UA concil be accessed with voice over yet?
>>Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>Nate Kile,
>>Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
>>Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low 
>>vision/virtual instruction for schools
>>Also Private training to your needs
>>907-444-3707
>>Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, 
>>Office products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with 
>>keystrokes: www.yourtechvision.com
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>send an email to 
>>ptaccess+unsubscribe@googleg
roups.com.
>>For more options, visit 
>>https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>send an email to 
>ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegr
oups.com.
>For more options, visit 
>https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
cats." - Albert Schweitzer 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Biginner in protules helps needed...

2017-11-23 Thread Phil Muir
These audio tutorials are a wee bit old now but are not to expensive and
will get you started in Pro Tools:

 

www.protoolswithspeech.com/

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Anne Davis
Sent: 23 November 2017 03:00
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Biginner in protules helps needed...

 

I am a beginner in pro tools as well.  In fact, I tried tosend a message to
the group a while back, but it bounced.

I am getting ready to start a master class through voices for all and I
could use a crash course in ProTools.  I'm literally brand new to the
industry and on a tight budget.

Any thoughts?

Thank you,

Annie

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of adarsh nair nandanam
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:01 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Biginner in protules helps needed...

 

Hi all... hope you all are doing good..
I'm adarsh. I'm a musician...
Now I am thinking to start programming
But I don't know where is the starting point
.. 
so, wich device you all are using?  What about the config??

I need your support

Thanks and regards:

Adarsh nair nandanam 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: What external hard drives are being used?

2017-11-22 Thread Phil Muir
Agreed.  Having said all that if like me you are using Pro Tools with a
single drive for samples and recording then a good SSD such as the Samsung
T3 1TB or Samsung EVO or pro are great options.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of TheOreoMonster
Sent: 22 November 2017 07:36
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: What external hard drives are being used?

 

SSD's load faster and sample libraries operate at their best wen they have
quick access to read /load the data they need to be playing back in real
time while you are playing the instrument. Recording is writing  to the
drive and your standard HDD is plenty fast these days to handle the writing
of recorded files. Also HDD's are a lot cheaper per Gigabyte than SSD's are.

On Nov 21, 2017, at 11:58 PM, Andre Jarreau 
wrote:

 

Flau, thanks for the insight.  Is there a TB SSD drive that should be
considered.

 

I have heard recordings should be done on a HDD and sample sound libraries
on an SSD.  Sounds backwards to me.

 

Thanks

 

Andre

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:18 PM
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: What external hard drives are being used?

 

Hi Andre,

 

It's perfectly normal to use the second Thunderbolt port for things like
drives. Some folks use peripherals like Thunderbolt Docks to gain multiple
format I/O for more flexibility. It's definitely recommended to use a
separate drive for the system and recording/media. If you're using an SSD,
it's not as critical to use yet another separate drive for samples but, if
you have the resources, it's definitely not a bad idea.

Hope that helps,

Slau

 

On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:16 PM, Andre Jarreau <
 andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> wrote:

 

Interesting question.  I have two TB ports on my Mac.  One for Audio
interface and I thought the other for external drives.  Is this a waste of
an TB port?

 

Secondly.  Is it true it is best to have PT and all other associated
recording software on one drive with a dedicated recording drive.  Mac
software being on the internal drive.

 

Third.  Should the midi sound library be on it's own drive.

 

Be patient with the newbee.

 

Andre

 

 

 

From:   ptaccess@googlegroups.com [
 mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 6:59 PM
To:   ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: What external hard drives are being used?

 

I got that one from Sweetwater. It is a great drive Nate  you will enjoy it.
I have had it as long as I have been on this Protools list so I guess that's
around four or five years never a problem. It runs for days or weeks.

Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154


On Nov 20, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Slau Halatyn < 
slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:

Cool. I had a Glyph CD burner at one point and the thing that amazed me was
that it had a 5-year warranty. It crapped out after 4 years and Glyph
replaced it, no questions asked and gave me another 5-year warranty on the
second drive. Can't beat that customer service.

Slau

 

On Nov 20, 2017, at 2:26 AM, Nathaniel Kile <
 heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Hello Slau,

I went with a Glyph Studio 2TB USB 3 drive. It was recommended by Avid and
after I read the specs I pulled the trigger.

Thanks for the input,

 

Nate Kile,

Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision 

Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual
instruction for schools

Also Private training to your needs

907-444-3707

Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office
products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes:
 www.yourtechvision.com

 

 

 

From:   ptaccess@googlegroups.com [
 mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 10:39 AM
To: PTAccess List < 
ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: What external hard drives are being used?

 

Hi Nate,

I've had great experiences with both Western Digital and seagate drives. In
every case, they were either seventy-two hundred or ten thousand rpm drives
for the HDD models. I've used the same brands for the SSD drives for sample
libraries but not for recording. I've never used them via USB, although
these days, USB 3 is plenty fast. Thus far, I've used 1 terabyte drives but
now looking into eight or ten terabyte models for HDD. As always, SSDs are
crazy expensive when getting into those capacities. If this is for
recording, 7200 rpm HDDs are plenty fast and you can pick them up for around
seventy dollars.

Slau

 

On Nov 19, 

RE: APOGEE Thunderbolt & monitor decoupling

2017-11-14 Thread Phil Muir
Brian.  Great post.  Just to add that long term there could be some better
options available also on the Mac side.  E.G. the Open Sound Control app
that has been developed for use on Windows is also being ported to Mac
although Can needs to work out a few bugs on it.  Still if your interface
uses the Open Sound Control network protocol then this could be potentially
great news.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brian Casey
Sent: 14 November 2017 09:34
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: APOGEE Thunderbolt & monitor decoupling

Extremely well put, I am coming from the perspective of using an analog
oriented workflow on the tracking side, I supose my underlying point is we
should carefully examine our actual needs and what we can and can't live
without.

The UA stuff is great and tracking through unison would be wesome to have
access to, but they are great products without touching that I'd imagine.
Presumably you could save a preset work space to always track through a neve
front end or something, which would extract some of the extra value/fun of
unison. 

Audient interfaces are another fine USB option but again no accessibility on
their mixer software, so to me RME is the most accessible I've found once
you have a control surface and some patience. 

This is an important discussion to have I think because blind and visually
impaired users are almost more restricted with interface options in the
medium term than with software. 

As someone running a studio as a business myself I tend to feel I am best
served by letting as little of the work as possible to the
software/interface systems, but that isn't the entirely the way to go
because of modern workflows and creativity. 

Sorry for the meandering message! 

I better get mixing!

Brian. 

Sent from my smart-ish phone!

> On 14/11/2017, at 8:57 AM, TheOreoMonster 
wrote:
> 
> Fair points, however Except in the cases of the high end interfaces
(Antelope & RME) USB latency isn't as low as TB. Granted anything under 10ms
may not be noticeable but USB still has the CPU hit that FW & TB doesn't.
Also FW ports are disappearing so you will need a dongle or a doc to use
them in the future. Also if you notice on the Antelope devices the USB
limits the number of I/O which isn't limited when the same devices are used
over Thunderbolt. So yes I agree a lot of it is marketing hype, but my real
world experiences of having used all 3 (I too had an A FW mixer for years)
and especially having used TB and USB in the last year especially, When it
comes to running big sessions and tracking through plug ins, USB still feels
sluggish in comparison to TB devices.I say all that to say , the AudioFUse
is USB 3, and claims to get 3ms of latency which is only about 1.5ms more
than TB devices, and has everything you will need available on the physical
hardware unit so you will probably never need to launch its control panel.
So yeah, exceptions to the rule and all. 
> 
>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Brian Casey 
wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Nate, 
>> 
>> As a quick note, firewire and usb aren't as restrictive as thunderbolt
marketing hype might suggest, for example the Allem and Heath interface card
in my console does 32 in and 32 out over firewire 400 with no problem, RME
and antilope also get huge results with usb based interfaces. 
>> 
>> I had an RME fireface UFX in the past, while its own mixer and routing
software wasn't accessible with a screenreader I was able to create monitor
mixes, route audio and use many of its monitor control type functionality as
it could be controled with a control surface using HUI protocol. At the time
I controled it with a BCF 2000 and it was actually a great system and I was
omly missing out on access to a small portion of its functions. 
>> 
>> Unfortunately the trend in interfaces is towards proprietary  on board
features that are as inaccessible as they ar awesome. 
>> 
>> Sent from my smart-ish phone!
>> 
>>> On 14/11/2017, at 3:16 AM, Nathaniel Kile 
wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> I am still going back and forth between the Apogee and the Apollo but
neither seem to be completely accessible. I am looking at the new Apollo's
with the quad shark processors, but the unison technology does not seem to
be accessible and I don't want to buy something and only be able to use half
of its features. What are you using? I am in the $1500 to $2000 range.
>>> Any suggestions? I have a couple clean pres, and thought about simply
picking up a Black Lion Audio AD converter, but then I would still have to
push audio through my 003 and it is only fire wire and I want a stronger
data transfer than fire wire can offer. 
>>> 
>>> Nate Kile,
>>> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision 
>>> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual
instruction for schools
>>> Also Private training to 

RE: WhatsApp group

2017-11-08 Thread Phil Muir
Good stuff!!  Also copied it to the complete drop box and wanna play drop
box links folders as there could be PT users there that don't know about the
group.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 08 November 2017 15:06
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: WhatsApp group

Hi Phil,
Yep, already did that. Cheers!

> On Nov 8, 2017, at 4:30 AM, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:
> 
> Slau.  You may wish to consider posting a link to the Whatsapp group in
the
> PT Access Drop Box
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: WhatsApp group

2017-11-08 Thread Phil Muir
Slau.  You may wish to consider posting a link to the Whatsapp group in the
PT Access Drop Box

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Plug-in Views - SD2 - Computer ID

2017-10-23 Thread Phil Muir
It could however I think registering the plug-in online is easier as once
logged in SD2 remembers all of that info E.G. username password etc.  That's
how we do it on Windows with my HSC set.  I have been in touch with Slau as
have all of those coordinates and am happy to provide them to Slau and
there's no reason why this wouldn't work on the Mac.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 23 October 2017 15:43
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Plug-in Views - SD2 - Computer ID

Hello Slau and list!

Using your great plug-in views I'm able to find a pup-up called "Help".
Do you know if it's possible to start the so called offline registration via
that pop-up? 
Maybe also the computer id could be retrieved by that way.
Having that id the installation and registration of sD2 could be possible
for blind users.

Thanks and best! / Martin


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Hopefully final SD2 questions

2017-10-17 Thread Phil Muir
Martin wrote: Hello SD2 users!

I found some stores still offering the DVD version of SD2.
Is this the recommended starting point regarding an accessible installation
etc?

Phil replied: that's a good starting point although once everything is
installed then you will probably need to get some help on the Mac with
authorising all of that in the product manager.

Martin wrote: When then buying additional SDX libraries for SD2...
Should I still try to get the DVD ones or could I use the Toontrack online
store.

Phil replied: you can get them from the Toontrack store or online although
if you do get them online then you may need to use the product manager to
get those files down and that's not very accessible on the Mac.  Having said
that once you have those files downloaded then they use standard Mac
installers.

Martin wrote: Just keeping in mind that maybe software platforms have
changed.

Phil replied: I would imagine that you will still be able to get those SDX's
online.  Anyway all SD2 content is compatible with SD3 so if at some point
SD3 becomes accessible then you will be able to use that SD2 content in SD3.

Martin wrote: Finally searching Phil's preset zip file for available SDX
libraries, is this the correct result?

To use Phil's "SL Allaire SDX preset": I have to buy the "New York Studios
Vol.2 SDX"?

To use Phil's "SL Avatar SDX preset": I have to buy the "New York Studios
Vol.3 SDX"?

To use Phil's "SL CVMKII SDX preset": I have to buy the "Custom and Vintage
SDX" and an upgrade to MK II or is MKII the current standard version?

Phil replied: MKII  is the current version.

Martin continues: To use Phil's "SL HitFactrory SDX preset": I have to buy
the " New York Studios Vol.2 SDX"?

To use Phil's "SL MusicCity SDX preset": I have to buy the "Music City USA
SDX"?

Phil replied: with regard to the rest of the SDX's you have listed there,
correct.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-10-17 Thread Phil Muir
Well if I have the SDX in question then chances are that I will get around
to making some presets for it.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 17 October 2017 09:45
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

Hi Phil!

OK, I found a store with some SDX for version 2 left.

What if I'll buy one or more SDX with no corresponding project presets out
of your zip file?
Having no assistant available, could I contact you for that job?

Best! / Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:40 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Version 3 is out for the moment as they have migrated to the Juce platform
> which at this point does not have an accessibility UI for Mac or Windows
so
> your best bet would be to use Superior Drummer 2 if you happen to have it.
> No currently no accessibility at all for Superior Drummer 3 on the Mac or
> Windows and most likely won't ever be unless we can get an accessibility
API
> built into the Juce platform.  Rest assured Toontrack are aware of the
issue
> and want to address it.  Put the Avatar routing below.  Note: this is the
> format that all of the s20 files follow:
> 
> Avatar Multy Out Routing
> Kick In
> 1/2
> Kick Out
> 3/4
> Kick Sub
> 5/6
> Snare Top
> 7/8
> Snare Bottom
> 9/10
> Snare FX
> 11/12
> Hi-hats
> 13/14
> Rack Tom 1
> 15/16
> Rack Tom 2
> 17/18
> Rack Tom 3
> 19/20
> Floor Tom 1
> 21/22
> Floor Tom 2
> 23/24
> Overheads
> 25/26
> Ambient
> 27/28
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf
> Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> Sent: 16 October 2017 12:28
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Hi Phil and list!
> 
> Could you provide me with your document regarding routing etc. in Superior
> Drummer II?
> Will all the plug-in views and presets also work with the current version
> III?
> 
> Thanks! / Martin
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:15 AM
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Just to add to this that although Pro Tools can't audition MIDI Loops
> without
> > importing them it looks like Reaper can so perhaps an alternative method
> to
> > audition all of the MIDI drum loops that ship with Superior could be to
> load
> > up Reaper and use that as an auditioning tool then load up the ones you
> like
> > into a PT session.  Here's a video showing Reaper in action doing this:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLnILdmx-8U
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
> > Sent: 23 April 2017 19:32
> > To: PTAccess List
> > Subject: Re: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> >
> >
> > It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because it
> involves
> > "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the same in
> > terms of dollars or whatever currency. Before I offer an opinion, first
> let me
> > say that Flo Tools offers access to UI elements within Superior Drummer
II
> > which is the only version you can currently buy. While Superior Drummer
> > does have MIDI loops available, the browser is not currently accessible.
> > Therefore, one must program drums manually. Manual drum programming
> is
> > not for everyone and, even for those who do it, for some it comes easy
> and
> > for others it's somewhat time-consuming. If one knows how to play drums
> or
> > knows how drummers play, it's a fairly straight-forward matter of
playing
> > parts on pads or keyboard. Superior Drummer comes with one library and
> > there are about a dozen other Superior Drummer libraries with the
letters
> > SDX before the library name. Superior can also play Easy drummer
libraries
> of
> > which there are dozens and those have an EZX in front of the library
name.
> > Superior Drummer costs around $300 but it often goes on sale for $199 or
> less
> > and that includes the default Avatar libr

RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-10-17 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Martin.  Great question.  Am assuming that any new SDX's released from
the end of September 2017 will be SD3 only.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 17 October 2017 09:23
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

Hello Phil!

Thanks.
Regarding the additional libraries...
Is there an indication to know if a library is compatible with version 2.

Thanks a lot and regards! / Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 9:26 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> No idea.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf
> Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> Sent: 16 October 2017 14:43
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Phil!
> 
> I just found some older II versions in the web.
> Do you know, if the version II of Superior Drummer and the additional
> libraries are High Siera ready?
> 
> Thanks! / Martin
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 3:01 PM
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Perhaps not.  Some retailers have SD2 boxes lying around so you may be
> able
> > to get hold of one.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf
> > Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> > Sent: 16 October 2017 13:48
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Hello Phil!
> >
> > So I'm a little to late. :-(
> >
> > But thanks for explaining.
> >
> > Best! / Martin
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:40 PM
> > > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> > >
> > > Version 3 is out for the moment as they have migrated to the Juce
> platform
> > > which at this point does not have an accessibility UI for Mac or
Windows
> > so
> > > your best bet would be to use Superior Drummer 2 if you happen to have
> > it.
> > > No currently no accessibility at all for Superior Drummer 3 on the Mac
> or
> > > Windows and most likely won't ever be unless we can get an
accessibility
> > API
> > > built into the Juce platform.  Rest assured Toontrack are aware of the
> > issue
> > > and want to address it.  Put the Avatar routing below.  Note: this is
> the
> > > format that all of the s20 files follow:
> > >
> > > Avatar Multy Out Routing
> > > Kick In
> > > 1/2
> > > Kick Out
> > > 3/4
> > > Kick Sub
> > > 5/6
> > > Snare Top
> > > 7/8
> > > Snare Bottom
> > > 9/10
> > > Snare FX
> > > 11/12
> > > Hi-hats
> > > 13/14
> > > Rack Tom 1
> > > 15/16
> > > Rack Tom 2
> > > 17/18
> > > Rack Tom 3
> > > 19/20
> > > Floor Tom 1
> > > 21/22
> > > Floor Tom 2
> > > 23/24
> > > Overheads
> > > 25/26
> > > Ambient
> > > 27/28
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > > On Behalf
> > > Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> > > Sent: 16 October 2017 12:28
> > > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> > >
> > > Hi Phil and list!
> > >
> > > Could you provide me with your document regarding routing etc. in
> > Superior
> > > Drummer II?
> > > Will all the plug-in views and presets also work with the current
> version
> > > III?
> > >
> > > Thanks! / Martin
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > > > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:15 AM
> > > > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> &g

RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-10-17 Thread Phil Muir
No idea.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 16 October 2017 14:43
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

Phil!

I just found some older II versions in the web.
Do you know, if the version II of Superior Drummer and the additional
libraries are High Siera ready?

Thanks! / Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 3:01 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Perhaps not.  Some retailers have SD2 boxes lying around so you may be
able
> to get hold of one.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf
> Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> Sent: 16 October 2017 13:48
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Hello Phil!
> 
> So I'm a little to late. :-(
> 
> But thanks for explaining.
> 
> Best! / Martin
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:40 PM
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Version 3 is out for the moment as they have migrated to the Juce
platform
> > which at this point does not have an accessibility UI for Mac or Windows
> so
> > your best bet would be to use Superior Drummer 2 if you happen to have
> it.
> > No currently no accessibility at all for Superior Drummer 3 on the Mac
or
> > Windows and most likely won't ever be unless we can get an accessibility
> API
> > built into the Juce platform.  Rest assured Toontrack are aware of the
> issue
> > and want to address it.  Put the Avatar routing below.  Note: this is
the
> > format that all of the s20 files follow:
> >
> > Avatar Multy Out Routing
> > Kick In
> > 1/2
> > Kick Out
> > 3/4
> > Kick Sub
> > 5/6
> > Snare Top
> > 7/8
> > Snare Bottom
> > 9/10
> > Snare FX
> > 11/12
> > Hi-hats
> > 13/14
> > Rack Tom 1
> > 15/16
> > Rack Tom 2
> > 17/18
> > Rack Tom 3
> > 19/20
> > Floor Tom 1
> > 21/22
> > Floor Tom 2
> > 23/24
> > Overheads
> > 25/26
> > Ambient
> > 27/28
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf
> > Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> > Sent: 16 October 2017 12:28
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Hi Phil and list!
> >
> > Could you provide me with your document regarding routing etc. in
> Superior
> > Drummer II?
> > Will all the plug-in views and presets also work with the current
version
> > III?
> >
> > Thanks! / Martin
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:15 AM
> > > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> > >
> > > Just to add to this that although Pro Tools can't audition MIDI Loops
> > without
> > > importing them it looks like Reaper can so perhaps an alternative
method
> > to
> > > audition all of the MIDI drum loops that ship with Superior could be
to
> > load
> > > up Reaper and use that as an auditioning tool then load up the ones
you
> > like
> > > into a PT session.  Here's a video showing Reaper in action doing
this:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLnILdmx-8U
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
> > > Sent: 23 April 2017 19:32
> > > To: PTAccess List
> > > Subject: Re: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because
it
> > involves
> > > "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the same
> in
> > > terms of

RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-10-16 Thread Phil Muir
Perhaps not.  Some retailers have SD2 boxes lying around so you may be able
to get hold of one.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
Sent: 16 October 2017 13:48
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

Hello Phil!

So I'm a little to late. :-(

But thanks for explaining.

Best! / Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:40 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Version 3 is out for the moment as they have migrated to the Juce platform
> which at this point does not have an accessibility UI for Mac or Windows
so
> your best bet would be to use Superior Drummer 2 if you happen to have it.
> No currently no accessibility at all for Superior Drummer 3 on the Mac or
> Windows and most likely won't ever be unless we can get an accessibility
API
> built into the Juce platform.  Rest assured Toontrack are aware of the
issue
> and want to address it.  Put the Avatar routing below.  Note: this is the
> format that all of the s20 files follow:
> 
> Avatar Multy Out Routing
> Kick In
> 1/2
> Kick Out
> 3/4
> Kick Sub
> 5/6
> Snare Top
> 7/8
> Snare Bottom
> 9/10
> Snare FX
> 11/12
> Hi-hats
> 13/14
> Rack Tom 1
> 15/16
> Rack Tom 2
> 17/18
> Rack Tom 3
> 19/20
> Floor Tom 1
> 21/22
> Floor Tom 2
> 23/24
> Overheads
> 25/26
> Ambient
> 27/28
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf
> Of Martin (Punky) Sopart
> Sent: 16 October 2017 12:28
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> 
> Hi Phil and list!
> 
> Could you provide me with your document regarding routing etc. in Superior
> Drummer II?
> Will all the plug-in views and presets also work with the current version
> III?
> 
> Thanks! / Martin
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Phil Muir
> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:15 AM
> > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> > Just to add to this that although Pro Tools can't audition MIDI Loops
> without
> > importing them it looks like Reaper can so perhaps an alternative method
> to
> > audition all of the MIDI drum loops that ship with Superior could be to
> load
> > up Reaper and use that as an auditioning tool then load up the ones you
> like
> > into a PT session.  Here's a video showing Reaper in action doing this:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLnILdmx-8U
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
> > Sent: 23 April 2017 19:32
> > To: PTAccess List
> > Subject: Re: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> >
> >
> > It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because it
> involves
> > "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the same in
> > terms of dollars or whatever currency. Before I offer an opinion, first
> let me
> > say that Flo Tools offers access to UI elements within Superior Drummer
II
> > which is the only version you can currently buy. While Superior Drummer
> > does have MIDI loops available, the browser is not currently accessible.
> > Therefore, one must program drums manually. Manual drum programming
> is
> > not for everyone and, even for those who do it, for some it comes easy
> and
> > for others it's somewhat time-consuming. If one knows how to play drums
> or
> > knows how drummers play, it's a fairly straight-forward matter of
playing
> > parts on pads or keyboard. Superior Drummer comes with one library and
> > there are about a dozen other Superior Drummer libraries with the
letters
> > SDX before the library name. Superior can also play Easy drummer
libraries
> of
> > which there are dozens and those have an EZX in front of the library
name.
> > Superior Drummer costs around $300 but it often goes on sale for $199 or
> less
> > and that includes the default Avatar library. The SDX expansions cost
> around
> > $150 each but they sometimes go on sale for half price. The EZX
libraries
> cost
> > around $100 but also go

RE: Plugin Presets?

2017-09-18 Thread Phil Muir
No.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: 18 September 2017 13:28
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Plugin Presets?

 

Is it possible to save plugin presets, within ProTools, as either an FXP or
FXB file?

 

Chris.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: question about new audio interface for travelling purposes and good microphone suggestions

2017-09-14 Thread Phil Muir
I think they will.  Especially if you explain why you are doing this and how
many visually impaired end users could benefit.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of TheOreoMonster
Sent: 14 September 2017 09:34
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question about new audio interface for travelling purposes and
good microphone suggestions

Yes I have had Focusrite support remote in and set up  Focusrite Control,
and pair the iOS app. Also saved presets for different scenarios I was
likely to use before the iOS app was available. All that is great but there
have been times I wanted to change or set up an interface for the first time
outside of support hours . Would be curious to see if they would stay on the
call long enough to do an extensive keyboard maestro set.  That being said
It would be nice if more interface went the route of the Behringer UMC or
the AudioFuse. All single knob/button per  control on the hardware and all
the routing can be done from your DAW. The AudioFuse Latency is supposed to
be down to 3ms, so I suppose its as good as USB is gonna get, and should be
low enough to track through plug ins without issues. 


> On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:56 AM, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:
> 
> Well if you had the Focusrite hardware you could then call technical
> support.  They are quite happy to remote into your machine with Team
viewer
> and no doubt would help create an accessible solution for their software
> with Keyboard Maestro.  Had them take a look on machines here and they are
> always happy to help.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: 14 September 2017 04:14
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: question about new audio interface for traveling purposes and
> good microphone suggestions
> 
> The second gen scarlet and the Clarett are using the same control
software.
> The difficulty  with Keyboard Maestro may be if it shows a different
> interface for each device type. Any idea if the Element Mac software is
> accessible or will we have to rely on the iOS software? 
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Apogee Element is a bit more expensive but 8 I/O and the iOS app is
> accessible. regarding the focusrite panel, I can probably make it pretty
> accessible through Keyboard Maestro. Curious if the Scarlet and Claret
> panels are the same. My brother just got one of those and I can probably
> grab it for testing purposes for the software.
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Steve Martin <monkeypushe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Portable and 8 combi inputs? Not sure that exist as anything with that
> many inputs usually ends up being atleast 1 rack space, or a larger
desktop
> format. THe Focusrite Clarett 4 pre has 8 inputs but only 4 are mic/line.
> The other 4 are just line inputs. Also it relies on the Focusrite control
> software for switching between line and instrument level on the first two
> inputs, Switching between the standard mic pres or the ones designed after
> their ISA preamps, and switching on the High Pass Filter. In my experience
> the iOS app was accessible with the 8prex so i assume the 4pre would work
> with it accessibly as well. The Mac app is not accessible last i looked.
> Regarding the mic, BLUE looks to be doing a buy one get one free on the
> Hummingbird till end of december. Not sure if they have switchable polar
> patterns but they seem well reviewed so may be worth a look especially
> considering the price for two during the promotion. 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 4:51 PM, Nick Gawronski <n...@nickgawronski.com>
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, I have been waiting until I really want to do some work before
> buying a new interface as my Digi 003 is rather large and it probably
won't
> be supported much longer so I want to get something before that happenss.
I
> would like around 8 inputs that are preferabley the combo jacks that can
> take both XLR and quarter inch connections.  I am not set on a brand as
long
> as I can effectively use it with Pro Tools 12 or higher.  I would like
> something that is easy to configure and can be taken places when I travel.
> For my microphone suggestion I would like a microphone that is able to
> switch between picking up everything in a room and just around the front
of
> it or is it better to buy two different microphones for this purpose?
Again
> I am not for any brand just as long as it is not one of those fall apart
> microphones and works well.  USB or

RE: question about new audio interface for travelling purposes and good microphone suggestions

2017-09-14 Thread Phil Muir
Well if you had the Focusrite hardware you could then call technical
support.  They are quite happy to remote into your machine with Team viewer
and no doubt would help create an accessible solution for their software
with Keyboard Maestro.  Had them take a look on machines here and they are
always happy to help.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of TheOreoMonster
Sent: 14 September 2017 04:14
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question about new audio interface for traveling purposes and
good microphone suggestions

The second gen scarlet and the Clarett are using the same control software.
The difficulty  with Keyboard Maestro may be if it shows a different
interface for each device type. Any idea if the Element Mac software is
accessible or will we have to rely on the iOS software? 
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Apogee Element is a bit more expensive but 8 I/O and the iOS app is
accessible. regarding the focusrite panel, I can probably make it pretty
accessible through Keyboard Maestro. Curious if the Scarlet and Claret
panels are the same. My brother just got one of those and I can probably
grab it for testing purposes for the software.
> 
> Slau
> 
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Steve Martin 
wrote:
>> 
>> Portable and 8 combi inputs? Not sure that exist as anything with that
many inputs usually ends up being atleast 1 rack space, or a larger desktop
format. THe Focusrite Clarett 4 pre has 8 inputs but only 4 are mic/line.
The other 4 are just line inputs. Also it relies on the Focusrite control
software for switching between line and instrument level on the first two
inputs, Switching between the standard mic pres or the ones designed after
their ISA preamps, and switching on the High Pass Filter. In my experience
the iOS app was accessible with the 8prex so i assume the 4pre would work
with it accessibly as well. The Mac app is not accessible last i looked.
Regarding the mic, BLUE looks to be doing a buy one get one free on the
Hummingbird till end of december. Not sure if they have switchable polar
patterns but they seem well reviewed so may be worth a look especially
considering the price for two during the promotion. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 4:51 PM, Nick Gawronski 
wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, I have been waiting until I really want to do some work before
buying a new interface as my Digi 003 is rather large and it probably won't
be supported much longer so I want to get something before that happenss.  I
would like around 8 inputs that are preferabley the combo jacks that can
take both XLR and quarter inch connections.  I am not set on a brand as long
as I can effectively use it with Pro Tools 12 or higher.  I would like
something that is easy to configure and can be taken places when I travel.
For my microphone suggestion I would like a microphone that is able to
switch between picking up everything in a room and just around the front of
it or is it better to buy two different microphones for this purpose?  Again
I am not for any brand just as long as it is not one of those fall apart
microphones and works well.  USB or thunderbolt connections probably
thunderbolt is best as that is what the future is going to version two of
thunderbolt or better probably is best but if it only supports version one
that is fine I want to buy for the future. Anymore questions please ask.  I
am going to look into a control surface as well would think it is best if
that is not part of the interface and if there is one that has automated
controls that move when Pro Tools moves the fadors and supports changing
plugin settings that would be nice.  Nick Gawronski
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, 

RE: Thunderbolt or Firewire

2017-08-25 Thread Phil Muir
Or as you are not requiring a lot of inputs you could even go USB if
required.

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Nickus de Vos
Sent: 25 August 2017 15:08
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thunderbolt or Firewire

 

Hi in my opinion FireWire is pretty much dead, yes you still get the
converters to connect FireWire devices to newer Mac's, but buying a new
FireWire device at this stage when you can go for thunderbolt directly,
won't be such a smart move.

Thunderbolt is much newer technology with much faster throughput and it will
be supported for some time to come, where some manufacturers already started
discontinuing support for FireWire.

 

As for your issue of only having one thunderbolt port, most fundable devices
monitors, drives, and audio interfaces,  have more than one port on them
which allows you to daisy chain devices.  Look for a interface with 2
Thunderbolt ports, run out off your computer into the interface, and out of
the Interface into your monitor. 

 

Look at the Focusrite Clarett interfaces, just keep in mind from what I
understand there Control software isn't accessible on the Mac. 

 

 

Nickus

Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos...


On 25 Aug 2017, at 15:37, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:

Doesn't matter really because firewire is still a good choice.  Also you are
still future proofed because as long as there's thunderbolt then chances are
you can get a firewire to thunderbolt converter and still use the firewire
device.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Bosher
Sent: 25 August 2017 14:29
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Thunderbolt or Firewire

Hi All,


I need to choose a new audio interface, and looking around suggests that 
Thunderbolt may be better than FireWire.   I only have one Thunderbolt 
port which is used by the monitor, so what would be the best way of 
connecting an interface?


Secondary question, do you have a recommendation for an interface with 
at least 4 (but not more than 8) independent inputs and MIDI in, from 
the likes of Focusrite or Mackie, whether TB or FW?

Best,

Peter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Thunderbolt or Firewire

2017-08-25 Thread Phil Muir
Doesn't matter really because firewire is still a good choice.  Also you are
still future proofed because as long as there's thunderbolt then chances are
you can get a firewire to thunderbolt converter and still use the firewire
device.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Bosher
Sent: 25 August 2017 14:29
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Thunderbolt or Firewire

Hi All,


I need to choose a new audio interface, and looking around suggests that 
Thunderbolt may be better than FireWire.   I only have one Thunderbolt 
port which is used by the monitor, so what would be the best way of 
connecting an interface?


Secondary question, do you have a recommendation for an interface with 
at least 4 (but not more than 8) independent inputs and MIDI in, from 
the likes of Focusrite or Mackie, whether TB or FW?

Best,

Peter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Accessible loudness meter plug-ins for mastering

2017-08-25 Thread Phil Muir
Tools Alt T followed by the letter S for statistics.  You can then tab over
and copy the data to notepad and it will most likely look something like
this:

Left Channel
Right Channel   
Cursor position (Time)  00:00:00.000
00:00:00.000
Sample value at cursor (dB) -92.029
-90.585 
Minimum sample position (Time)  00:00:55.606
00:01:08.721
Minimum sample value (dB)   -1.021
-1.021  
Maximum sample position (Time)  00:00:56.092
00:00:12.405
Maximum sample value (dB)   -1.022
-1.022  
RMS level (dB)  -15.548
-15.556 
Average value (dB)  -Inf.
-Inf.   
Zero crossings (Hz) 1,703.44
1,585.26
Maximum true peak sample position (Time)00:02:21.047
00:02:18.652
Maximum true peak sample value (dB) -0.989
-0.993  
Maximum filtered true peak sample position (Time)   00:00:16.736
00:00:20.089
Maximum filtered true peak sample value (dB)-0.000
-0.186  

Integrated Loudness (LUFS)  -12.24
Loudness Range (LU)  3.80
Maximum True Peak Loudness (dBTP)   -0.99
Maximum Short-Term Loudness (LUFS)  -10.13
Maximum Momentary Loudness (LUFS)   -8.48

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Bosher
Sent: 25 August 2017 14:22
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Accessible loudness meter plug-ins for mastering

Hi Phil,


You wrote:


  Can also easily check LUFS in Sound Forge 11

How do you do that please?

Best,

Peter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Accessible loudness meter plug-ins for mastering

2017-08-25 Thread Phil Muir
Hey Nickus.  That's one reason I still work in Windows as I can use the TT
Dynamic Range meter to check levels when mastering in Samplitude using
iZotopes oZone 6 Advanced.  Can also easily check LUFS in Sound Forge 11
again on Windows.  Don't know of any tools like this on Mac OS.  Also the TT
Dynamic range meter is now discontinued.  It's been replaced by the MAAT DR
Meter witch is inaccessible because it uses the Juce platform.  I have been
in touch with MAAT who develop this and there isn't anything that can be
done at the moment but they would like to make it accessible if at all
possible.  Really glad I have some great tools on Windows to do this.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
of Nickus de Vos
Sent: 25 August 2017 11:53
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Accessible loudness meter plug-ins for mastering

Hi all
Are their anyone who found a usable loudness meter plug-in enabling you to
master to specific loudness standards? From time to time I must master some
things for TV or radio and I'm finding this harder and harder to do with the
enforcement of loudness standards getting more strict.

All these type plug-ins like Izotope Loudness Controll are purely visual,
making them impossible to use for a blind person. Anyone came across a semi
accessible plug-in or have some clever work around? I'm sure there are some
of you on this list who came across this problem before, I know there's
someone on here who does a lot of mastering, I can't remember the name now.

Nickus

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Changing parameters in Waves plugins

2017-08-18 Thread Phil Muir
Personally a huge fan of Valhalla Vintage Verb and all of his plug-ins are
great value at $50.00 for each one.  Low CPU footprint and extremely easy to
authorise.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 17 August 2017 04:00
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: Changing parameters in Waves plugins

Hey Nate,

If there was an easy way to simply copy and paste the hundreds of plug-ins
into my reply, that would make things a whole lot easier :) To generalize, I
take full advantage of all of the stock plug-ins plus the bundles that Avid
has put out over the years. That includes things like the Pultec, Fairchild,
Joe Meek, Voce bundles, among others. I'm also a fan of the stomp box
plug-ins that came out a couple of years ago. I use the Sound Toys plug-ins
a lot and a number of Plug-in Alliance offerings. There are some things that
I use all the time and some things that occasionally get instantiated. There
are the meat and potato plug-ins that virtually always get used like the
stock plug-ins and there are those that are more utilitarian like Pitch'n
Time, RX6, Drum Leveler, SPL Transient Designer, etc. Then there are things
like Altiverb, Arousor and some of the Sound Toys stuff that are more a
matter of taste from project to project.

All of that stuff is, of course, more on the audio side. Virtual Instruments
naturally includes Komplete Ultimate, all of the AIR expansions, Mach 5,
Ravenscroft, Ivory and… I can't think of what else off the top of my head
right now. Hope that answers your question.
Slau

> On Aug 16, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Nathaniel Kile 
wrote:
> 
> Hello Slau,
> Out of curiosity, what plugins are you using now a days? 
> Thanks,
> Nate
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 5:56 AM
> To: PTAccess List
> Subject: Re: Changing parameters in Waves plugins
> 
> I don't use Waves plug-ins anymore but, if you're using Flo Tools, you can
create a Plug-in View that will click on the coordinates for the parameters
so you can simply type in the value. It would take some sighted assistance
to initially find those places on screen but, from then on, you'll be able
to enter values after navigating and clicking the mouse. Of course, that
would have to be done for each separate plug-in. Just an option.
> Slau
> 
>> On Aug 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, John André Lium-Netland
 wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> When interacting with the parameters in E-Channel and other Waves
plugins, I find that it takes a whole lot of arrowing to change the
parameters. Any tricks out there to change the parameters faster or set a
specific value for a parameter? I miss the way it works in the AVID plugin
parameters :)
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Anone tried the Presonus Faderport 8?

2017-08-12 Thread Phil Muir
>From what I hear it's a great control surface and very accessible.

On 12 August 2017 13:42:04 BST, Nickus de Vos  wrote:
>Hi all
>Have anyone tried the Presonus Faderport 8 control surface? I would
>like to hear your thoughts on it of course from a VO users perspective.
>
>I read reviews on it and watched videos, I also had around 5 minuts
>with it the other day at a expo, but couldn’t actually try it out. A
>big positive for us I guess is that it has no touch screens or pads so
>we’re not missing out on anything in terms of that. Another big
>positive for me is how usable it’s in PT even though it’s primarily not
>a device designed for use with PT. Then there’s of course also the
>price, $500 for a 8 motorized fader control surface is very decent.
>
>Your thoughts?
>
>Nickus
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Pro Tools Accessibility for pupils who are severely sight impaired

2017-08-03 Thread Phil Muir
I wouldn't personally recommend using Pro Tools on the Windows side.  Note:
this is from someone who uses it on the Mac and have occasionally used it on
Windows in order to get out stuff.  Having said that if you were to move to
Windows then other options such as Samplitude Pro X 3 Suite which is
basically 9697 % Sequoia is extremely accessible using the Jaws screen
reader and the scripts available on:

 

http://www.samplitudeaccess.org.uk/

 

.  Reaper is another option on Windows although not personally used it much
and I appreciate all of the above may be taking you away from using Pro
Tools.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of doobie Mac
Sent: 03 August 2017 19:10
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pro Tools Accessibility for pupils who are severely sight
impaired

 

Hi Christopher,

 

I appreciate your candour here. Pro Tools is complex and the priority needs
to be the development of their VoiceOver skills. 

 

One work around, given the limited time available in a single school
session, would be to use a laptop / pc workstation with Dolphin Supernova
(screen enlargement) and the latest PC version of Pro Tools. I'm waiting to
hear back from Pro Tools about this. 

 

Thank you again,

 

Paul

 

 

 

On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 at 18:55, Christopher-Mark Gilland
 wrote:

Having not seen a beta version of ProTools, and being what I know about
betas, you're probably on a nondisclosure agreement, and cannot reveal
anything about it, which is fair, but, honestly, Paul, I don't mean to be
blunt about this, but, I feel like they really need to get their Voiceover
skills down pat before trying to take on a complex DAW like ProTools. We'll
definitely help you along the way, please don't misinterpret what I'm saying
here, as that's indeed what we're all here on this list for, but having a
lower skill in the assistive tech side of it... (in this case, Voiceover,)
is going to pose some issues inevitably.

---
Christopher Gilland
Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries

 

http://www.gshministry.org
(980) 500-9575

- Original Message - 

From: doobie   Mac 

To: Pro Tools Accessibility   

Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 1:50 PM

Subject: Re: Pro Tools Accessibility for pupils who are severely sight
impaired

 

Hi Christopher, 

 

Thank you for your swift reply. The pupil's skills with VoiceOver are not
that advanced, which in itself is an issue, and we will be supporting and
assisting the pupil in developing these this session. 

 

Pro Tools is also brand new to the pupil and the licences that we currently
have are dated versions of Pro Tools. We will be addressing this also.

 

Can I ask what you would suggest?

 

Kind regards,

 

Paul

On Thursday, 3 August 2017 18:33:36 UTC+1, Chris wrote: 

Paul,

 

Are these students not using Voiceover on the mac in combination with
ProTools?

---
Christopher Gilland
Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries

 

http://www.gshministry.org
(980) 500-9575

- Original Message - 

From: doobie Mac 

To: Pro Tools Accessibility 

Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 1:28 PM

Subject: Pro Tools Accessibility for pupils who are severely sight impaired

 

Hello all, 

 

This is my first post to this Google Group. I work in a Scottish Secondary
School and we support pupils, who are severely sight impaired, to access the
curriculum and learning.

 

However, we are having great difficulty in making Pro Tools accessible for a
senior pupil, as the level of detail that is displayed on the Monitor is far
too small. The pupil's Near Vision is around N36.

 

Can anyone offer advice in relation to this please?

 

Kind regards,

 

Paul

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message 

Re: Beginner guide or video for blind users

2017-07-25 Thread Phil Muir
The IC Music training is great.  Also Kevin Reaves on list does training so it 
may be worth chatting to him.

On 21 July 2017 06:47:18 BST, Andre Woods  wrote:
>You really should try i see music 3128101001. Ask for Byron Harde. I
>just completed an 7 week class. They provide training and help you get
>equipment  312 810 1001 byron harden. Tell him Andre referred you. 
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen 
>wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Ramy
>> This is Jørgen from Denmark.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your answer, I will buy this training stuff, and
>begin to learn about using it.
>> 
>> After that I will buy a blind ProTools teacher for tips for using
>ProTools, for blind people, maybe I will ask some questions here on the
>mailing list, but if I can help others here on the list I will be glad,
>
>> I have also a seeing music engineer I can ask for help with my
>control panel on my soundcard, because it is not accessible for
>VoiceOver users. 
>> One of my sighted music engineers have produced A ProTools template
>for me and some sessions for my UAUDIO Apollo 8 soundcard.
>> He said, it is possible to make more advanced templates in ProTools,
>that can use my effects on my Apollo 8 soundcard.
>> I can also ask my seeing audio Engineer friends to help me sometimes
>but mostly with advanced stuff.
>> 
>> But all i can do it myself is the best. :)
>> 
>>  best regards
>> Jørgen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 19 Jul 2017, at 01.03, Ramy Moustafa 
>wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello:
>>> 
>>> Ramy is here From Egypt.
>>> am new like you, but I got all my
>> 
>>> mation through this great mailing list,
>>> 
>>> I   Think, you can start from the protools with speech. there are
>>> tutorials that use the Pt with Voice over, I must say that the
>>> tutorial is old, but can be a very very good point to start.
>>> 
>>> after that , you can see what are you doing to do.
>>> 
>>> Have a great day
>>> 
 On 7/18/17, Jørgen Skov Nielsen  wrote:
 Hello all
 
 I am using the newest version of ProTools with the newest Flo tools
>together
 with my Apollo 8 Quad, if you want to read more about my studio
>setup, you
 can do that on my post with the subject My home studio should I buy
>more
 before I can begin
 For more than 10 years ago, I have used my windows computer to make
>music
 with, but for about 10 years ago, the programs was not very
>accessible with
 a screenreader.
 I have used a harddisk recorder on my Tyros keyboard. But I want to
>have
 more control over my recordings and I want to mex my music better.
 In 2008 I bought my first Mac, I have now used it about 9 years,
>and I have
 tried to record before in ProTools on a old sound device.
 Now I have bought my dream setup, and now I should learn to make my
>music on
 my Mac with ProTools, but can I find some video guides or podcast
>with
 accessibility in mind.
 I want to learn to record my own music, and if there is a person
>that will
 helping me with some recording tips for blind users, I will be
>glad.
 If there is a ProTools user, that can teach me about the Protools
>use, I
 will be glad, I want to pay for a teacher, , so are you a good
>ProTools user
 and you want to teach a blind person on the internet over skype or
>Facetime,
 feel free to contact me,
 I hope anyone can help me with my questions.
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Best regards
 Jørgen Skov Nielsen
 
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Ramy MoustafaSaber
>>> Music instructor @:
>>> Faculty ofmusical education
>>> Music arranger and Sound engineer @:
>>> Harmony Recording Studio
>>> https://www.facebook.com/HarmonyRecordingStudio.eg
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

Re: the pt access dropbox folder that's shared

2017-07-01 Thread Phil Muir
That Windows utility was called unlocker.  So much for predictive text ;-)

On 1 July 2017 23:03:38 BST, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:
>Not sure on Mac but used a utility on Windows called unlocked.  Seem to
>remember being careful when installing it though as it offered some
>other packages that I didn't want.
>
>On 1 July 2017 22:01:19 BST, Jed Barton <j...@jedbarton.com> wrote:
>>any idea what kind of utility i could get?  This is basicly holding
>>everything up.  Any ideas?
>>
>>On 7/1/17, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:
>>> You are going to have to get some kind of utility that allows you to
>>unlock
>>> a folder from a drive because you don't have permission for that
>>Dropbox
>>> folder.
>>>
>>> On 1 July 2017 21:41:52 BST, Jed Barton <j...@jedbarton.com> wrote:
>>>>Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>>OK, i am trying to change the location of my dropbox folder.  I want
>>>>to put it on 1 of my external drives.  There was already an old
>>folder
>>>>on there called dropbox.  I can not delete it at all, cause it keeps
>>>>saying access denied.  The problem is the ptaccess  shared folder,
>it
>>>>won't let me delete it.  Any ideas what i should do?  It's annoying
>>>>cause i need to fix this and it's standing in my way.  Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>send
>>>>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>-- 
>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: the pt access dropbox folder that's shared

2017-07-01 Thread Phil Muir
Not sure on Mac but used a utility on Windows called unlocked.  Seem to 
remember being careful when installing it though as it offered some other 
packages that I didn't want.

On 1 July 2017 22:01:19 BST, Jed Barton <j...@jedbarton.com> wrote:
>any idea what kind of utility i could get?  This is basicly holding
>everything up.  Any ideas?
>
>On 7/1/17, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:
>> You are going to have to get some kind of utility that allows you to
>unlock
>> a folder from a drive because you don't have permission for that
>Dropbox
>> folder.
>>
>> On 1 July 2017 21:41:52 BST, Jed Barton <j...@jedbarton.com> wrote:
>>>Hey guys,
>>>
>>>OK, i am trying to change the location of my dropbox folder.  I want
>>>to put it on 1 of my external drives.  There was already an old
>folder
>>>on there called dropbox.  I can not delete it at all, cause it keeps
>>>saying access denied.  The problem is the ptaccess  shared folder, it
>>>won't let me delete it.  Any ideas what i should do?  It's annoying
>>>cause i need to fix this and it's standing in my way.  Any ideas?
>>>
>>>--
>>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: the pt access dropbox folder that's shared

2017-07-01 Thread Phil Muir
You are going to have to get some kind of utility that allows you to unlock a 
folder from a drive because you don't have permission for that Dropbox folder.

On 1 July 2017 21:41:52 BST, Jed Barton  wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>OK, i am trying to change the location of my dropbox folder.  I want
>to put it on 1 of my external drives.  There was already an old folder
>on there called dropbox.  I can not delete it at all, cause it keeps
>saying access denied.  The problem is the ptaccess  shared folder, it
>won't let me delete it.  Any ideas what i should do?  It's annoying
>cause i need to fix this and it's standing in my way.  Any ideas?
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Vintage reverb

2017-06-28 Thread Phil Muir
There are presets for it but the preset manager for it is inaccessible on
Windows.  No idea on Mac.  Still make up my own presets and use those.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Bosher
Sent: 28 June 2017 13:21
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Vintage reverb

Hi All,


Thanks to Chris and Phil for recommending Vintage Reverb from 
ValhallaDSP.  I have it working and it does generally sound good, but is 
there a trick to adjusting parameters?  when I interact with them and 
try the usual VO-up/down the values speak but don't change.


Also, there don't seem to be any default presets.  Is that right or is 
there another trick?

Best,


Peter


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Waves VoiceOver Accessibility up date.

2017-06-22 Thread Phil Muir
Chuk wrote: Real engineers use Mac!

 

Phil replied: LOL, unless if like me you happen to be working in Samplitude
Pro X 3 Suite on a Bootcamped Mac in Windows which includes DDP import, DDP
export, and Samplitude Pro X3 Suite's codebase is around 96 97% Sequoia,
LOL!  Do also have Pro Tools 12.7.1 on the Mac side and can hop between the
2 although Samplitude Pro X3 Suite is my primary DAW ;-)

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of CHUCK REICHEL
Sent: 22 June 2017 18:55
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Waves VoiceOver Accessibility up date.

 

Hi Chris,

Real engineers use mac!

Just kidding!

>From my communications I think "$" might be supported!

Talk soon

 

CHUCK REICHEL

soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com

www.SoundPictureRecording.com  

954-742-0019

Isaiah 26 : 3

 Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because
he trusteth in thee.

 

In GOD I Trust

 

On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Chris Smart wrote:





Absolutely! Mentioning accessibility in the actual release notes speaks
volumes.
I just hope they include the Windows side in these efforts.


At 12:51 PM 6/22/2017, you wrote:



That looks like a  significant public step forward to me!

 

Very nice

 

Sent from my smart-ish phone!

 

On 22/06/2017, at 5:47 pm, CHUCK REICHEL
<soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com>
wrote:

 

Hi Guys,

Heres the first fruits!

http://www.wave
s.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements

Enjoy

Chuck

 

 

 

CHUCK REICHEL

soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com

www.SoundPictureRecording.com

954-742-0019

Isaiah 26 : 3

Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because
he trusteth in thee.

 

In GOD I Trust

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to
ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegro
ups.com.

For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to
ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegro
ups.com.

For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." -
Albert Schweitzer 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Waves VoiceOver Accessibility up date.

2017-06-22 Thread Phil Muir
Correct.  Nothing for Windows users.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: 22 June 2017 17:51
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Waves VoiceOver Accessibility up date.

So this accessibility work, laudible as it is, applies only to Mac folks?

At 12:47 PM 6/22/2017, you wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>Heres the first fruits!
>http://www.wav
es.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements
>Enjoy
>Chuck
>
>
>
>CHUCK REICHEL
>soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
>www.SoundPictureRecording.com
>954-742-0019
>Isaiah 26 : 3
>  Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: 
> because he trusteth in thee.
>
>In GOD I Trust
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>send an email to 
>ptaccess+unsubscribe@googlegr
oups.com.
>For more options, visit 
>https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
cats." - Albert Schweitzer 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Go-to reverb

2017-06-22 Thread Phil Muir
Agreed.  All of his verbs are great.  Use Vintage Verb all the time.  Really
low on CPU and way better than the Pantheon that Pete mentioned :-)

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: 22 June 2017 15:57
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Go-to reverb

ValhallaDSP's Vintage Verb is excelent and only $50. All of their 
reverbs are worth having: Vintage, Room, Plate and Shimmer.

At 10:15 AM 6/22/2017, you wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>
>When possible, I prefer to have one really good plug-in that I get 
>to know well, rather than a whole bunch with different 
>interfaces.For reverb, That used to be Lexicon Pantheon.  I find 
>PT's native D-verb remarkably horrible, so my question is, if you 
>had to choose just one go-to reverb plug-in, to use with PT, for 
>quality first, and accessibility too, which one would you recommend, 
>and a rough price and website would be really helpful too if easy to do
please.
>
>
>Whilst writing, I just have to add my heartfelt thanks and 
>appreciation to Slau, Chi and the others for Flotools 2.2.  It rocks.
>
>
>Best,
>
>
>Peter
>
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
cats." - Albert Schweitzer 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

2017-06-17 Thread Phil Muir
Maybe we should start talking to them on Twitter.  Worth a try.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 17 June 2017 10:50
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

 

Phil, I'd like to get involved as well. I've sent them quite a number of
males regarding RX five and six. Is there anything more I can do?

Best,

JPR

 

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 17/06/2017 à 11:47, Phil Muir a écrit :

In the case of iZotope I got together with Chris Smart and wrote them a
letter explaining why they may wish to make products accessible.  They were
very open to the idea and we managed to get a number of visually impaired
testers on to the beta program.  Unfortunately they have had some internal
restructuring done and the person who would have been able to restart the
beta doesn’t have the power to do that.  I am still in talks with iZotope
about resurrecting this beta program because I think it’s needed both on
Windows and Mac and a number of you have been in touch with me expressing an
interest in getting involved.

 


  _  


From:  <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> ptaccess@googlegroups.com
[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 17 June 2017 00:02
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

 

Slau. that sounds very discouraging doesn't it?

Let me ask you, What motivated Avid to work on ProTools accessibility? I
suppose they started by Giving you all this market share blah blah, but
then, what made them change their minds?

Even smaller companies like Izotope made some of their products accessible
like Rx, even though Rx accessibility is declining with newer versions, but
it seems they were Concerned with accessibility, at least temporarily. I
wonder why. Did the boss Have a blind friend or family member? It would be
interesting to know what motivates people to do unprofitable things.

Best,

JPR

 

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 16/06/2017 à 19:53, Slau Halatyn a écrit :

The subject of accessibility as it relates to the JUCE platform has been
discussed on the JUCE forum. One of the guys from Sound Radix posted earlier
this year on a few key points: 

https://forum.juce.com/t/accessibility-for-blind-people-using-voiceover/2104
0

 

As far as Avid is concerned, there is no financial consideration, per se,
but there most certainly was a point when I had suggested crowd funding.
There's no question that, in the long run, having the company make it part
of their standard workflow is the way to go. Of course, you can't compare
Avid to an open-source company so it's quite different. Further, most
developers are one-man operations and will definitely shy away from that
kind of financial hit. In my opinion, it simply won't happen. If JUCE
developers follow the practices set forth by Sound Radix, we're in good
shape across dAW platforms. The remaining issue would be the presets problem
and that is currently being looked at by several companies including Avid.
The idea would be to create an industry-standard format that could be read
by any dAW on any platform. It was raised earlier this year by a developer
and, coincidentally, by one of the biggest software developers in the
industry and Avid, along with others, has signed on to try and make it
happen.

 

BTW, the whole iLok thing had nothing to do with JUCE but QT. Regardless,
the best solutions will have to address all platforms.

 

Slau

 

On Jun 16, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:

 

JPR.  Juce can already be made to be somewhat accessible.  You just need to
know how to do that.  For instance.  The Ilok Licence manager on Windows and
Mac is somewhat accessible on both platforms.  I think Slau may have had
discussions with Pace on the Ilok application.  No reason why that same
accessibility couldn't be ported to other apps.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 16 June 2017 16:23
To: viplist; ptaccess@googlegroups.com; logic-accessibil...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

Dear friends,

this one could change our musical lives For good, so I hope you don't mind
me posting it to several lists at a time.
Juce Is A set of libraries that are used to develop music applications. It
is already being used by about 500 companies, among which Pianoteq, UVI,
Korg, Max, SampleModeling...
for those with a better skill Than mine in computer science, here is their
website.

http://juce.com

Juce Provides tools for developers that allows them to build applications
that are compatible with every oper

RE: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

2017-06-17 Thread Phil Muir
JPR.  Not sure.  Shall try asking the guy who set up the original beta again
to see what can be done.  Have been pushing this door for a number of years
and unfortunately not expecting it to open any time soon :-(

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 17 June 2017 10:50
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

 

Phil, I'd like to get involved as well. I've sent them quite a number of
males regarding RX five and six. Is there anything more I can do?

Best,

JPR

 

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 17/06/2017 à 11:47, Phil Muir a écrit :

In the case of iZotope I got together with Chris Smart and wrote them a
letter explaining why they may wish to make products accessible.  They were
very open to the idea and we managed to get a number of visually impaired
testers on to the beta program.  Unfortunately they have had some internal
restructuring done and the person who would have been able to restart the
beta doesn’t have the power to do that.  I am still in talks with iZotope
about resurrecting this beta program because I think it’s needed both on
Windows and Mac and a number of you have been in touch with me expressing an
interest in getting involved.

 


  _  


From:  <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> ptaccess@googlegroups.com
[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 17 June 2017 00:02
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

 

Slau. that sounds very discouraging doesn't it?

Let me ask you, What motivated Avid to work on ProTools accessibility? I
suppose they started by Giving you all this market share blah blah, but
then, what made them change their minds?

Even smaller companies like Izotope made some of their products accessible
like Rx, even though Rx accessibility is declining with newer versions, but
it seems they were Concerned with accessibility, at least temporarily. I
wonder why. Did the boss Have a blind friend or family member? It would be
interesting to know what motivates people to do unprofitable things.

Best,

JPR

 

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 16/06/2017 à 19:53, Slau Halatyn a écrit :

The subject of accessibility as it relates to the JUCE platform has been
discussed on the JUCE forum. One of the guys from Sound Radix posted earlier
this year on a few key points: 

https://forum.juce.com/t/accessibility-for-blind-people-using-voiceover/2104
0

 

As far as Avid is concerned, there is no financial consideration, per se,
but there most certainly was a point when I had suggested crowd funding.
There's no question that, in the long run, having the company make it part
of their standard workflow is the way to go. Of course, you can't compare
Avid to an open-source company so it's quite different. Further, most
developers are one-man operations and will definitely shy away from that
kind of financial hit. In my opinion, it simply won't happen. If JUCE
developers follow the practices set forth by Sound Radix, we're in good
shape across dAW platforms. The remaining issue would be the presets problem
and that is currently being looked at by several companies including Avid.
The idea would be to create an industry-standard format that could be read
by any dAW on any platform. It was raised earlier this year by a developer
and, coincidentally, by one of the biggest software developers in the
industry and Avid, along with others, has signed on to try and make it
happen.

 

BTW, the whole iLok thing had nothing to do with JUCE but QT. Regardless,
the best solutions will have to address all platforms.

 

Slau

 

On Jun 16, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:

 

JPR.  Juce can already be made to be somewhat accessible.  You just need to
know how to do that.  For instance.  The Ilok Licence manager on Windows and
Mac is somewhat accessible on both platforms.  I think Slau may have had
discussions with Pace on the Ilok application.  No reason why that same
accessibility couldn't be ported to other apps.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 16 June 2017 16:23
To: viplist; ptaccess@googlegroups.com; logic-accessibil...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

Dear friends,

this one could change our musical lives For good, so I hope you don't mind
me posting it to several lists at a time.
Juce Is A set of libraries that are used to develop music applications. It
is already being used by about 500 companies, among which Pianoteq, UVI,
Korg, Max, SampleModeling...
for those with a better skill Than mine in computer s

RE: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

2017-06-17 Thread Phil Muir
In the case of iZotope I got together with Chris Smart and wrote them a
letter explaining why they may wish to make products accessible.  They were
very open to the idea and we managed to get a number of visually impaired
testers on to the beta program.  Unfortunately they have had some internal
restructuring done and the person who would have been able to restart the
beta doesn’t have the power to do that.  I am still in talks with iZotope
about resurrecting this beta program because I think it’s needed both on
Windows and Mac and a number of you have been in touch with me expressing an
interest in getting involved.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 17 June 2017 00:02
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

 

Slau. that sounds very discouraging doesn't it?

Let me ask you, What motivated Avid to work on ProTools accessibility? I
suppose they started by Giving you all this market share blah blah, but
then, what made them change their minds?

Even smaller companies like Izotope made some of their products accessible
like Rx, even though Rx accessibility is declining with newer versions, but
it seems they were Concerned with accessibility, at least temporarily. I
wonder why. Did the boss Have a blind friend or family member? It would be
interesting to know what motivates people to do unprofitable things.

Best,

JPR

 

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 16/06/2017 à 19:53, Slau Halatyn a écrit :

The subject of accessibility as it relates to the JUCE platform has been
discussed on the JUCE forum. One of the guys from Sound Radix posted earlier
this year on a few key points: 

https://forum.juce.com/t/accessibility-for-blind-people-using-voiceover/2104
0

 

As far as Avid is concerned, there is no financial consideration, per se,
but there most certainly was a point when I had suggested crowd funding.
There's no question that, in the long run, having the company make it part
of their standard workflow is the way to go. Of course, you can't compare
Avid to an open-source company so it's quite different. Further, most
developers are one-man operations and will definitely shy away from that
kind of financial hit. In my opinion, it simply won't happen. If JUCE
developers follow the practices set forth by Sound Radix, we're in good
shape across dAW platforms. The remaining issue would be the presets problem
and that is currently being looked at by several companies including Avid.
The idea would be to create an industry-standard format that could be read
by any dAW on any platform. It was raised earlier this year by a developer
and, coincidentally, by one of the biggest software developers in the
industry and Avid, along with others, has signed on to try and make it
happen.

 

BTW, the whole iLok thing had nothing to do with JUCE but QT. Regardless,
the best solutions will have to address all platforms.

 

Slau

 

On Jun 16, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Phil Muir <i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk>
wrote:

 

JPR.  Juce can already be made to be somewhat accessible.  You just need to
know how to do that.  For instance.  The Ilok Licence manager on Windows and
Mac is somewhat accessible on both platforms.  I think Slau may have had
discussions with Pace on the Ilok application.  No reason why that same
accessibility couldn't be ported to other apps.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 16 June 2017 16:23
To: viplist; ptaccess@googlegroups.com; logic-accessibil...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

Dear friends,

this one could change our musical lives For good, so I hope you don't mind
me posting it to several lists at a time.
Juce Is A set of libraries that are used to develop music applications. It
is already being used by about 500 companies, among which Pianoteq, UVI,
Korg, Max, SampleModeling...
for those with a better skill Than mine in computer science, here is their
website.

http://juce.com

Juce Provides tools for developers that allows them to build applications
that are compatible with every operating system, Windows, OS X, Linux,
without
having to recode For each System.
This also means these Developers depend on Juce for things like their
graphic interface.
I just spoke to someone from the Juce support team about our accessibility
issues.
Useless to say that, if Juce  could give its clients an accessibility
module, that would be the end of our problems, And all Plug-ins developed
withJuce  could instantly become
accessible at once. But Such a tool would take about six months and
Approximately $111000 To develop. Who has this money?
Of course, Juce  is not Apple, not eaven Avid, and they cannot afford to pay
for this development by themselves, espe

RE: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

2017-06-17 Thread Phil Muir
Seem to remember that NI use QT.  If that is the case then maybe the need to
talk to Pace as they used that and made the Ilok manager somewhat accessible
both on Mac and Windows.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 16 June 2017 23:45
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

Hi Andre.

unfortunately no. Native instruments does not use Juce.

best regards,

JPR


http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

Le 16/06/2017 à 21:33, Andre Woods a écrit :
> Hello,
>   
>   I appreciate your advocacy for us. Would native instruments happen
to be one of the 500  company's?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Jean-Philippe Rykiel 
wrote:
>>
>> Dear friends,
>>
>> this one could change our musical lives For good, so I hope you don't
mind me posting it to several lists at a time.
>> Juce Is A set of libraries that are used to develop music applications.
It is already being used by about 500 companies, among which Pianoteq, UVI,
Korg, Max, SampleModeling...
>> for those with a better skill Than mine in computer science, here is
their website.
>>  http://juce.com
>>
>> Juce Provides tools for developers that allows them to build applications
that are compatible with every operating system, Windows, OS X, Linux,
without
>> having to recode For each System.
>> This also means these Developers depend on Juce for things like their
graphic interface.
>> I just spoke to someone from the Juce support team about our
accessibility issues.
>> Useless to say that, if Juce  could give its clients an accessibility
module, that would be the end of our problems, And all Plug-ins developed
withJuce  could instantly become
>> accessible at once. But Such a tool would take about six months and
Approximately $111000 To develop. Who has this money?
>> Of course, Juce  is not Apple, not eaven Avid, and they cannot afford to
pay for this development by themselves, especially since, after these six
initial
>> months, comes an unpredictable time of maintenance, as things never work
as expected…
>> So, two things could be done. One would be crowdfunding. but how many
Blind musicians would be ready to pay, and how much, ?
>> Another solution would be to make companies that use Juce  for their
plug-ins concerned With accessibility. If each company Invested a small
amount of
>> money, something like 5000 each, if they feel accessibility would Also
improve their image and reputation, Then the goal would be reached.
>> For this to work, they need testimonials from As many blind musician as
Possible, who dream to use such plug-ins but can't.
>> I would be happy to be your Intermediate, and transmit all these
testimonials to the Juce team, who will Transmit these to their 500 partners
on our behalf.
>>
>> So, what do you say?
>> Best regards,
>> JPR
>>
>> http://www.jprykiel.com
>> http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
>> http://twitter.com/ryksounet
>> http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: putting the full pro tools 12 installers for the mac along with the avid plugins into the ptaccess dropbox folder for ease of location

2017-06-17 Thread Phil Muir
Rather than putting those installers in the folders you would be better to
maybe put them somewhere on your own dropbox then post a link to those files
as those take up quite a lot of space.  Or you could contact Avid technical
support who no doubt would sort you out with direct links to the files.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Nick Gawronski
Sent: 17 June 2017 00:27
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: putting the full pro tools 12 installers for the mac along with the
avid plugins into the ptaccess dropbox folder for ease of location

Hi, I was trying to redownload Pro Tools 12 as I had to reinstall my mac 
and as usual as I had bought the student teacher version of Pro Tools 12 
I was not able to locate the downloads as in the my products section I 
only see Pro Tools 11 when I had Pro Tools 12 installed before.  If 
possible could someone please place the Pro Tools 12 installer along 
with the other Avid plugins for ease of use into the ptaccess dropbox 
folder?  I have tried on both windows 10 pro 64 bits along with a mac to 
get access to my downloads in my Avid account and am unable to do so 
because of the web sites not very good accessibility.  I am not sure if 
this has anything to do with the student teacher version but I do think 
this needs to be brought to Avid's attention.  Nick Gawronski

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

2017-06-16 Thread Phil Muir
JPR.  Juce can already be made to be somewhat accessible.  You just need to
know how to do that.  For instance.  The Ilok Licence manager on Windows and
Mac is somewhat accessible on both platforms.  I think Slau may have had
discussions with Pace on the Ilok application.  No reason why that same
accessibility couldn't be ported to other apps.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Sent: 16 June 2017 16:23
To: viplist; ptaccess@googlegroups.com; logic-accessibil...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Juce accessibility, How to get the money?

Dear friends,

this one could change our musical lives For good, so I hope you don't mind
me posting it to several lists at a time.
Juce Is A set of libraries that are used to develop music applications. It
is already being used by about 500 companies, among which Pianoteq, UVI,
Korg, Max, SampleModeling...
for those with a better skill Than mine in computer science, here is their
website.
  
http://juce.com

Juce Provides tools for developers that allows them to build applications
that are compatible with every operating system, Windows, OS X, Linux,
without
having to recode For each System.
This also means these Developers depend on Juce for things like their
graphic interface.
I just spoke to someone from the Juce support team about our accessibility
issues.
Useless to say that, if Juce  could give its clients an accessibility
module, that would be the end of our problems, And all Plug-ins developed
withJuce  could instantly become
accessible at once. But Such a tool would take about six months and
Approximately $111000 To develop. Who has this money?
Of course, Juce  is not Apple, not eaven Avid, and they cannot afford to pay
for this development by themselves, especially since, after these six
initial
months, comes an unpredictable time of maintenance, as things never work as
expected.
So, two things could be done. One would be crowdfunding. but how many Blind
musicians would be ready to pay, and how much, ?
Another solution would be to make companies that use Juce  for their
plug-ins concerned With accessibility. If each company Invested a small
amount of
money, something like 5000 each, if they feel accessibility would Also
improve their image and reputation, Then the goal would be reached.
For this to work, they need testimonials from As many blind musician as
Possible, who dream to use such plug-ins but can't.
I would be happy to be your Intermediate, and transmit all these
testimonials to the Juce team, who will Transmit these to their 500 partners
on our behalf.

So, what do you say?
Best regards,
JPR

http://www.jprykiel.com
http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet
http://twitter.com/ryksounet
http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Flo Tools 2.2 is live

2017-06-15 Thread Phil Muir
Been listening to the demo of Flo Tools 2.2 posted at:

 

http://flotools.org/Flo-Tools-2.2-release/

 

Very impressive!!  Great job all!!

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 15 June 2017 18:12
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Flo Tools 2.2 is live

 

For those who already have Flo Tools 2.01 installed, the next time you
launch Pro Tools, you should get a notification that the new version of Flo
Tools, version 2.2, is available. Alternatively, you can just go to
floTools.org and download the installer. Which ever way you go about it,
it's out in the wild. Go get it!

 

For what it's worth, I'm pasting the "What's New" below but that's also
available at the web site.

 

Cheers,

 

slau

 

What's New in Flo Tools 2.2

 

Wait, 2.2? What happened to 2.1? What about 2.0.2? While we're at it, was
there a 2.0.1b? Well, let's not get too hung up on the numbers and instead
take a look at what's new in the version formerly known as 2.whatever.

 

Speak / Toggle Tab to Transients  Command+Option+Tab

Blind Pro Tools users are quite familiar with navigating through tracks by
using the Tab key with modifiers to jump to clip boundaries. One of the
really helpful modes when editing with keyboard shortcuts is the Tab to
Transients feature. If you've ever done a lot of drum editing, you'll know
how useful and time-saving a feature it is. However, there often comes a
point where the line between what's a transient and what's a clip boundary
becomes confusing, especially when you begin to cycle back and forth between
Tab to Transients being on or off. You might find yourself pressing Tab ,
thinking you're moving by transient and you're suddenly editing a clip that
you didn't intend to change. Since we often gather information by tabbing
and playing to verify certain things upon playback rather than navigating to
a control to check its status, it can potentially get a bit tedious when
doing a lot of editing with many clips and many transients.

 

The "Speak / Toggle Tab to Transients" macro reports the status of the Tab
to Transients button. Double-tapping the shortcut toggles the state. This
macro makes it easy to quickly verify the current mode and switch back and
forth swiftly and reliably.

 

Speak / Toggle Insertion Follows Playback   Control+n

If you had to guess what this macro does. you'd probably be correct. Need we
say more?

 

Speak / Select Shuffle Mode f1

Speak / Select Slip Mode f2

Speak / Select Spot Modef3

Speak/Select Grid Mode  f4

Naturally, these macros are virtually self-explanatory. All you need to know
is that a single tap reports the state of the edit mode and double-tapping
the shortcut toggles the state, just like the aforementioned macros. Note
that Grid Mode has two states: Absolute and Relative. Once Grid Mode has
been selected, further double-tapping will toggle between Absolute and
Relative Grid Mode.

 

Speak / Toggle QuickPunch  Command+Shift+p

Speak / Toggle Loop Playback Command+Shift+l

speak / Toggle Loop RecordOption+l

Speak/Toggle Pre/Post Roll  Command+k

Most users will remember that these record and playback mode shortcuts are
found under the Options menu. You've probably gotten used to the shortcuts
and maybe even have them memorized. The thing is, most of these modes cannot
be changed while the transport is engaged. Now, imagine you've hit the play
button and are getting ready to punch in a vocalist's performance but you're
unaware or at least forgot that you turned off QuickPunch earlier in the
session. That singer might  very well the about to give the performance of
their lives while you're about to sit there listening to the previous take,
unaware that pressing the Record button won't work because QuickPunch is not
enabled. Well, now you can verify whether QuickPunch is on while the
transport is rolling. While it is true that if QuickPunch is not enabled,
you won't be able to turn it on before the punch-in point but at least you
can instantly stop the transport and double-tap the same shortcut to quickly
toggle it on. What's more, if QuickPunch was on to begin with, you will have
saved yourself the trouble of stopping in the first place.

 

The same idea holds true for Loop Record and Loop Playback although the
stakes might not be as high as when it comes to the pressure of a punch-in.
Still, it's nice to be able to verify before engaging the transport rather
than having everything stop at the end of a selection when you thought you
were in loop mode all along.

 

While it's possible to toggle Pre/Post-Roll during playback, having the
ability to report the state before toggling it, if necessary, Helps avoid
having to toggle and playing to verify the Pre/Post-Roll status.

 

Increase / Decrease Instrument Volume Command+Option+up/down arrows

The Flo Tools Inspector offers shortcuts for just about everything in a
track's channel strip. 

RE: Apple's fusion drives

2017-06-07 Thread Phil Muir
Agreed.  Don't waste your time with fusion drives.  Go SSD.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Niklas Karlsson
Sent: 07 June 2017 13:18
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: SV: Apple's fusion drives

Hi,

>From what I've heard, the fusion drives are not working correctly with PT,
since it continuisly is moving files from the rotating drive to the SSD.

I think the best and quickest way to run it is via a hard drive that is only
SSD.
I have it here and it works great!

Best,
Niklas

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] För
Martin (Punky) Sopart
Skickat: den 7 juni 2017 09:26
Till: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Apple's fusion drives

Hi list!

Are the fusion drives by Apple compatible with PT, when installing both the
os and PT on that one drive.
Regarding reading and writing of audio/midi data.

Thanks! / Martin


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: RX6 installer

2017-05-30 Thread Phil Muir
All of the latest iZotope installers on Mac and Windows are totally
inaccessible.  I have told iZotoep about this but heard nothing back thus
far.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Niklas Karlsson
Sent: 30 May 2017 11:17
To: 'ptaccess@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RX6 installer

Hi all,

I downloaded a demo of Izotope:s RX6 the other day, but when I tried to
install it I wasn't able to navigate through the setup window with VO.
I just wonder if someone else on here has experienced the same issue with
RX6, or if there's just something I'm doing wrong? ??

All the best,
Niklas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: question about markers

2017-05-24 Thread Phil Muir
Very cool!!

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steve Martin
Sent: 24 May 2017 18:48
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question about markers

 

Logic does ask you if you want to import tempo information when importing a
midi file with it.

 

Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> 





On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:36 PM -0400, "Phil Muir"
<i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk> wrote:

Not exactly markers related but still important.  One cool feature of Pro
Tools is the fact that when you export MIDI you can also export the MIDI
properties.  When a MIDI track is brought into another DAW such as
Samplitude, Samplitude will ask you if you want to import the tempo map.
This could be important to some as it was for me recently as I had been sent
a session in which the file gradually speeded up.  When I looked in
Samplitude's markers manager I could see all of the location points and
where the tempo map changed and this had all been done in Pro Tools.  Also I
was asked to do some drum replacement with Superior Drummer and was able to
easily do that with the same MIDI file that the producer had used with other
drum software and it all synced up beautifully.  Would be interesting to see
if Logic can do something similar.
 
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 13 May 2017 18:29
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: question about markers
 
Hi Brian,
Marker info is not embedded in a WAV. Clip information can be but I'm not
sure if Logic will interpret clip info in the same way. In other words, clip
info for a continuous WAV file is embedded and the host application imports
that file and sees the associated clips and recognizes their timestamps.
Pure Marker location information can be exported separately as text and
imported into a spreadsheet or text editor but then you'd have to manually
recreate those markers elsewhere in another DAW. Come to think of it,
markers can only be imported into Pro Tools from other session files rather
than from text so there's certainly a limitation going the other way but,
who knows, maybe Logic can import markers from a text file.
HTH,
Slau
 
> On May 12, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Brian Howerton  wrote:
> 
> Hello folks,
> When exporting audio multitracks out of pro tools, is it possible to also
export the marker information?  I'm wanting to import these tracks in to
logic, and I want the marker information to come in as well.  Thanks so
much,
> Brian
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: question about markers

2017-05-24 Thread Phil Muir
Not exactly markers related but still important.  One cool feature of Pro
Tools is the fact that when you export MIDI you can also export the MIDI
properties.  When a MIDI track is brought into another DAW such as
Samplitude, Samplitude will ask you if you want to import the tempo map.
This could be important to some as it was for me recently as I had been sent
a session in which the file gradually speeded up.  When I looked in
Samplitude's markers manager I could see all of the location points and
where the tempo map changed and this had all been done in Pro Tools.  Also I
was asked to do some drum replacement with Superior Drummer and was able to
easily do that with the same MIDI file that the producer had used with other
drum software and it all synced up beautifully.  Would be interesting to see
if Logic can do something similar.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 13 May 2017 18:29
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: question about markers

Hi Brian,
Marker info is not embedded in a WAV. Clip information can be but I'm not
sure if Logic will interpret clip info in the same way. In other words, clip
info for a continuous WAV file is embedded and the host application imports
that file and sees the associated clips and recognizes their timestamps.
Pure Marker location information can be exported separately as text and
imported into a spreadsheet or text editor but then you'd have to manually
recreate those markers elsewhere in another DAW. Come to think of it,
markers can only be imported into Pro Tools from other session files rather
than from text so there's certainly a limitation going the other way but,
who knows, maybe Logic can import markers from a text file.
HTH,
Slau

> On May 12, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Brian Howerton  wrote:
> 
> Hello folks,
> When exporting audio multitracks out of pro tools, is it possible to also
export the marker information?  I'm wanting to import these tracks in to
logic, and I want the marker information to come in as well.  Thanks so
much,
> Brian
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Using Protools with Mackie MCU pro

2017-05-23 Thread Phil Muir
Submit a question?  No link required.  Just ask whatever you want to ask and
we shall see if we can help ;-)

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andre Woods
Sent: 23 May 2017 19:42
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Using Protools with Mackie MCU pro

 

Hello, can someone send a link to where you submit a question 

Sent from my iPhone


On May 18, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Donal Fitzpatrick 
wrote:

Hi there peoples,

 

Ok, this is probably so far beneath most of you that it doesn't bear asking,
but I'm going to do so anyway.  Before I do, I just want to give a
disclaimer:  I'm not an audio engineer, musician, or anything like that.
I'm actually an assistant prof. who teaches software development and HCI
who mucks around with audio stuff in whatever spare time is available.

 

So to the point.  I've got my hands on a Mackie MCU-Pro.  I've connected it
up to Protools, and opened the mixing session from the fantastic Protools
with speech tutorials..  Now:  Can any of you point me at an "idiot's guide"
to using PT with a control surface?  I've done my work (and it's basic basic
stuff) using keyboard only thus far.  I've produced a few podcasts,
screencast audio tracks (and the like) but that's about it.  however, I may
be undertaking an M.Sc. in music technology in the autumn, and part of that
is based around Protools; so I'm trying to get a head-start.

 

Thanks again for any answers, and your patience.

 

Donal

 

Séanadh Ríomhphoist/Email Disclaimer

Tá an ríomhphost seo agus aon chomhad a sheoltar leis faoi rún agus is lena
úsáid ag an seolaí agus sin amháin é. Is
  féidir tuilleadh a
léamh anseo. 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for use by the addressee. Read more
  here.

 
 


   

   


 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: album pre order and are there any mastering engineers on this list?

2017-05-18 Thread Phil Muir
Yes indeed.  Among other things I am a mastering engineer.  Have E-mailed
you off list.

Regards, Phil Muir

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cameron Strife
Sent: 18 May 2017 17:51
To: ptaccess
Subject: album pre order and are there any mastering engineers on this list?

Hi everybody.

Two quick things...

Using the link below, you can pre order my next solo album for only
$5! If people want to put another amount into the kitty, I have
different things at various levels. please check it out and feel free
to send feedback my way! You'll find background info as well as the
first batch of demos...

http://www.gofundme.com/2kjjphuh

Everybody that shares this link on facebook will be entered into a
drawing to win a previous album of mine either in mp3 format, or, a
physical cd if you'd prefer something tangible.

While we're on the subject, do any of you have recommendations for
getting this link to more people? My facebook and twitter reach isn't
that big and I'm just not getting a lot of traction with this. If I
were friends with Satriani, Santana, or Oprah, getting it to a ton of
people would probably be a lot easier but I'm not in that boat. Lol. I
know there are tons of people doing the same thing I am with this and
I feel I'm not standing out.

Finally, are there any mastering engineers on this list? If so, could
you send me some before and after clips off list please? I'm
interested in finding someone to master this and it'd be nice if I
could pay someone in this community to do the job. You can reach me
off list at: came...@cameronstrife.com

Thanks,

Cameron.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Two questions

2017-05-10 Thread Phil Muir
The groups that used Roger have moved to wechat.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stefan Albertshauser
Sent: 10 May 2017 10:16
To: Pro Tools Access
Subject: Two questions



 Hi,


I have two questions:
1. How would you edit mouth clicks?
2. How would you time stretch a clip from 30 seconds to 2 minutes without
using the mouse?

Thanks in advance.

Stefan
P.S.: What's going on with the groups, that used roger?Von meinem iPhone
gesendet

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Ravens croft Update

2017-04-29 Thread Phil Muir
Ah the joys of shared folders on Drop box.  I suspect you may have copied
the folder from Dropbox on to your system or an external drive attached to
your system.  The problem then is that because you only have read access
wrights then you can't remove the folder from your system or even an
external drive because you are not the admin for the folder.  I too had an
issue with the PT Access Dropbox being locked on my system and couldn't
delete it because I had move my dropbox folders else where so it was no
longer required.  Hat to locate a utility on Windows called unlocker which
was able to unlock the folder from the file system and ultimately remove.  I
couldn't remove it until I had done that because I didn't have file
permissions to do that.  I suspect there would be a similar application
available for the Mac.  You won't be able to get rid of that folder on the
Mac until it's unlocked.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brian Howerton
Sent: 29 April 2017 16:02
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Ravenscroft Update

Hi Slau,
That worked.  Now when I am trying to delete the true piano presets from the
folder, it is saying that it cannot be completed because the operation is
locked.  Any suggestions as to why it might be saying that?  It tries to
move them to the trash but then I get that error message.  Thanks,
Brian
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Hi Brian,
> The folder structure in the Plug-In  Settings folder within the Drop Box
is the same as for your local Plug-In Settings folder. In other words, you
can copy an entire folder from the Drop Box version and paste it into your
local Plug-In Settings folder and it'll work. Copy the UVI Workstation
folder and paste it into Plug-In Settings on your system. Unless you have
the True Keys grand pianos from VI Labs, you won't need those so you can
delete them if you want.
> HTH,
> Slau
> 
>> On Apr 29, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Brian Howerton 
wrote:
>> 
>> Guys,
>> Disregard last message.  I finally found where it needed to go.  Now, my
only other question is I am assuming that I would copy the three pro tools
ravens croft presets in to my plugin settings folder for PT.  Do I need to
create any folder within that folder for the ravens croft, and if so what do
I need to call it for this to work?  I did this once before, but it has been
forever.  Also, within the UVI workstation folder in dropbox, I see other
presets in there, but I am assuming the only ones I need to copy are the
multi out preset, the close preset, and the default preset.  I seem to
remember having to create a UVI workstation folder within my plugin settings
folder as I am writing this, is that correct?  Thanks guys, help is much
appreciated.
>> Brian
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-04-23 Thread Phil Muir
To add a bit of clarity.  You could load up Superior Drummer 2 in Reaper
then audition the MIDI loops that way.

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Phil Muir
Sent: 23 April 2017 23:15
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

 

Just to add to this that although Pro Tools can't audition MIDI Loops
without importing them it looks like Reaper can so perhaps an alternative
method to audition all of the MIDI drum loops that ship with Superior could
be to load up Reaper and use that as an auditioning tool then load up the
ones you like into a PT session.  Here's a video showing Reaper in action
doing this:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLnILdmx-8U

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 23 April 2017 19:32
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

 

Hi Steve,

 

It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because it
involves "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the
same in terms of dollars or whatever currency. Before I offer an opinion,
first let me say that Flo Tools offers access to UI elements within Superior
Drummer II which is the only version you can currently buy. While Superior
Drummer does have MIDI loops available, the browser is not currently
accessible. Therefore, one must program drums manually. Manual drum
programming is not for everyone and, even for those who do it, for some it
comes easy and for others it's somewhat time-consuming. If one knows how to
play drums or knows how drummers play, it's a fairly straight-forward matter
of playing parts on pads or keyboard. Superior Drummer comes with one
library and there are about a dozen other Superior Drummer libraries with
the letters SDX before the library name. Superior can also play Easy drummer
libraries of which there are dozens and those have an EZX in front of the
library name. Superior Drummer costs around $300 but it often goes on sale
for $199 or less and that includes the default Avatar library. The SDX
expansions cost around $150 each but they sometimes go on sale for half
price. The EZX libraries cost around $100 but also go on sale for half price
perhaps once a year or so.

 

So, all told, you might spend as little as $150 or as much as a thousand
dollars, depending on when and what you buy. It's hard to say whether it's
worth it. To me, it's undoubtedly the best sounding virtual drum library out
there. I've heard pretty much all of them and, while some are great, I think
Superior Drummer is a cut above. Now that it's fairly accessible in Pro
Tools, I think it's a great way to go if you're adept at programming drum
parts.

 

HTH,

Slau

 

On Apr 22, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote:

 

Hi guys i know this is going back a while now, how ever i'm thinking about
purchasing superior drummer, I've just reread the below email. 

is this the best accessible solution for us to create drum tracks using  p
t. How well does this work. what version of superior drummer is this
compatible with. is it superior drummer 2 how easy is this to use, and is
this a good solution. Sorry a few questions. I guess to sum up is this worth
getting.

Steve

 

.

 

On 29 Dec 2016, at 8:48 am, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

For those not sharing in the Drop Box for bandwidth concerns, here
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/6f8s5fhmuiy08y9/Plug-In%20Views%20shared.zip?dl=1
>  are the initial plug-in view files for Superior Drummer. Also, here
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/lb5p4jn2hskzq76/Superior%20Drummer%202%20Project%
20Presets.zip?dl=1>  are a bunch of multi-out files that Phil Muir created. 

Long story short (and you'll have to fill in some blanks as I'm in a bit of
a rush right now), if you want to use Phil's multi-out routings:

Instantiate Superior on  a stereo  instrument track.

Use Control plus the arrow keys to navigate to the Load/Save menu and select
"Load."

Navigate to one of Phil's multi SD2 files and make sure it's a library that
you own and load it.

Create 15 stereo aux tracks.

Interact with the input of the first aux track and, with
Command+Option+Shift pressed,  set it to Plug-In>Superior Drummer Insert
A>bus 3-4.

 

Now any sequence on the Instrument track will be split out to kick in, kick
out, sub kick, snare top, snare bottom, etc.

 

This is a very quick and dirty explanation but that's the basic story. Phil
might chime in with more of a description and possibly paste in the text of
the document he created explaining the routing and what's on each set of
busses.

 

Later,

slau

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email t

RE: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

2017-04-23 Thread Phil Muir
Just to add to this that although Pro Tools can't audition MIDI Loops
without importing them it looks like Reaper can so perhaps an alternative
method to audition all of the MIDI drum loops that ship with Superior could
be to load up Reaper and use that as an auditioning tool then load up the
ones you like into a PT session.  Here's a video showing Reaper in action
doing this:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLnILdmx-8U

 

  _  

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Slau Halatyn
Sent: 23 April 2017 19:32
To: PTAccess List
Subject: Re: Superior Drummer plug-in views docs

 

Hi Steve,

 

It's difficult to answer an "is it worth it" kind of question because it
involves "worth" which translates into money and not everybody thinks the
same in terms of dollars or whatever currency. Before I offer an opinion,
first let me say that Flo Tools offers access to UI elements within Superior
Drummer II which is the only version you can currently buy. While Superior
Drummer does have MIDI loops available, the browser is not currently
accessible. Therefore, one must program drums manually. Manual drum
programming is not for everyone and, even for those who do it, for some it
comes easy and for others it's somewhat time-consuming. If one knows how to
play drums or knows how drummers play, it's a fairly straight-forward matter
of playing parts on pads or keyboard. Superior Drummer comes with one
library and there are about a dozen other Superior Drummer libraries with
the letters SDX before the library name. Superior can also play Easy drummer
libraries of which there are dozens and those have an EZX in front of the
library name. Superior Drummer costs around $300 but it often goes on sale
for $199 or less and that includes the default Avatar library. The SDX
expansions cost around $150 each but they sometimes go on sale for half
price. The EZX libraries cost around $100 but also go on sale for half price
perhaps once a year or so.

 

So, all told, you might spend as little as $150 or as much as a thousand
dollars, depending on when and what you buy. It's hard to say whether it's
worth it. To me, it's undoubtedly the best sounding virtual drum library out
there. I've heard pretty much all of them and, while some are great, I think
Superior Drummer is a cut above. Now that it's fairly accessible in Pro
Tools, I think it's a great way to go if you're adept at programming drum
parts.

 

HTH,

Slau

 

On Apr 22, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote:

 

Hi guys i know this is going back a while now, how ever i'm thinking about
purchasing superior drummer, I've just reread the below email. 

is this the best accessible solution for us to create drum tracks using  p
t. How well does this work. what version of superior drummer is this
compatible with. is it superior drummer 2 how easy is this to use, and is
this a good solution. Sorry a few questions. I guess to sum up is this worth
getting.

Steve

 

.

 

On 29 Dec 2016, at 8:48 am, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

For those not sharing in the Drop Box for bandwidth concerns, here
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/6f8s5fhmuiy08y9/Plug-In%20Views%20shared.zip?dl=1
>  are the initial plug-in view files for Superior Drummer. Also, here
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/lb5p4jn2hskzq76/Superior%20Drummer%202%20Project%
20Presets.zip?dl=1>  are a bunch of multi-out files that Phil Muir created. 

Long story short (and you'll have to fill in some blanks as I'm in a bit of
a rush right now), if you want to use Phil's multi-out routings:

Instantiate Superior on  a stereo  instrument track.

Use Control plus the arrow keys to navigate to the Load/Save menu and select
"Load."

Navigate to one of Phil's multi SD2 files and make sure it's a library that
you own and load it.

Create 15 stereo aux tracks.

Interact with the input of the first aux track and, with
Command+Option+Shift pressed,  set it to Plug-In>Superior Drummer Insert
A>bus 3-4.

 

Now any sequence on the Instrument track will be split out to kick in, kick
out, sub kick, snare top, snare bottom, etc.

 

This is a very quick and dirty explanation but that's the basic story. Phil
might chime in with more of a description and possibly paste in the text of
the document he created explaining the routing and what's on each set of
busses.

 

Later,

slau

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr

RE: [ddots-l] Fwd: Home Mastering Masterclass Open for sign-ups now !

2017-04-13 Thread Phil Muir
It certainly is!!

-Original Message-
From: ddots-l-bou...@freelists.org [mailto:ddots-l-bou...@freelists.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smart
Sent: 13 April 2017 15:48
To: midimag...@mailman.midimag-xt.org
Cc: ddot...@freelists.org; vipaudioacc...@freelists.org;
ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: [ddots-l] Fwd: Home Mastering Masterclass Open for sign-ups now !

As Phil and I can attest, this course is well 
worth the money if you want to learn the basics of mastering.

Chris


>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:01:07 +
>From: "Ian Shepherd @ Production Advice" 
>Subject: Open for sign-ups now !
>Sender: "Ian Shepherd @ Production Advice"
>  

RE: Upgrading to pt 12.7

2017-03-14 Thread Phil Muir
Log into your Avid account and download PT from the website.

-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Ramy Moustafa
Sent: 14 March 2017 13:09
To: protools mailing list
Subject: Re: Upgrading to pt 12.7

Hello all:

I Downloaded the latest Ilok Mamager, and I still can not get my Pt
12.7, I have my contract until 17-april 2017

what can I do?

Thanks


On 3/9/17, Ramy Moustafa  wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> I have now my Pro tools v12.5, `II didn't see the upgrade to V12.7, i read
> about this on avid `website, and they said that i must change something in
> my avid account, frankly i can't understand, what can i do.
> so, can you guide me to what should i do to get the update?\
>
> Thanks
>
>


-- 
Ramy MoustafaSaber
Music instructor @:
Faculty ofmusical education
Music arranger and Sound engineer @:
Harmony Recording Studio
https://www.facebook.com/HarmonyRecordingStudio.eg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  1   2   >