Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

On 10/2/14 7:15 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote: Can we at least publish a new WD so people stop referring to the old TR/? Yes of course. (And certainly continue to work with Anne, Marcos, etc. on a mutually agreeable way forward for Issue 75.) And speaking of Issue 75: On 9/25/14 9:26 AM, Mounir

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

On 9/25/14 9:26 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote: On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, at 21:52, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 9/25/14 6:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: It effectively comes down to the fact that the specification describes something, but Chrome implements it in another way per how I suggested it should

Re: PFWG request for abstract and introductions

On 9/4/14 8:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi Michael, All, Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just noticed it)! Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Edit

PSA: Michael van Ouwerkerk is a co-Editor of Push API

I'm happy to announce that based on the recommendation of Bryan and Eduardo, Michael van Ouwerkerk is now a co-Editor of the Push API. -Thanks, AB

[admin] PSA = Public Service Annoucement

Someone did indeed ask, so here it is: PSA = Public Service Announcement. Sorry I hadn't made that clear to everyone.

Re: Looking for a home for a proposed Credential Management API.

On 9/24/14 10:00 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: On 09/24/2014 03:57 PM, Mike West wrote: (I'd originally sent this just to the folks on to: and cc:. Art reminded me that public is better, so I'm resending to public-webapps@, and BCCing public-webappsec@ for visibility). Hello, chairs of the WebApps,

PSA: publish new WD of Push API on October 2

Subject: Re: [Webpush] IETF proposes new "Web-Based Push Notifications" Working Group Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:59:21 +0100 From: Peter Beverloo To: Arthur Barstow CC: Michael van Ouwerkerk , Bryan Sullivan , EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA , public-webapps On Fri, Sep 26,

Re: [Webpush] IETF proposes new "Web-Based Push Notifications" Working Group

On 9/26/14 10:42 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: If you would prefer that the IETF wg charter refer to something else, please let me know promptly. A small correction is still possible, but the window is closing. Well, it seems like IETF process would suggest/prescribe what should be done. (I d

Re: [Webpush] IETF proposes new "Web-Based Push Notifications" Working Group

On 9/24/14 1:21 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk wrote: The linked working draft is now more than a year old. The latest editor's draft has some inconsistencies while we transition to a service worker based system, but it's much closer to the current discussions: https://w3c.github.io/push-api/ Tha

CfC: to using new pub process; deadline October 2

On 9/25/14 9:32 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: Ok so, let's start getting consensus on the new pub work flow [1]. I want us to be the first using the new pub process the second it is available. Does anyone object to Editors in this group using [1]? [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/pubworkflow.html T

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

On 9/25/14 6:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: It effectively comes down to the fact that the specification describes something, but Chrome implements it in another way per how I suggested it should work (using "animation frame tasks"). So this appears to be [Issue-40] and I think a one-line su

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

On 9/24/14 12:06 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: There is no point in putting anything on /TR/ until the W3C fixes the ability to have documents sync with what is on GH. Otherwise, we will just find ourselves here again in a few months. The stability of the document doesn't have any correlation to i

[Webpush] IETF proposes new "Web-Based Push Notifications" Working Group

[ Bcc webp...@ietf.org ] Hi All, I recall the IETF's intent to create a web-based push notifications protocol standard was previously announced on this list. Please note the draft charter for this WG explicitly mentions WebApps: [[ ...

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

n 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis: <https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/> The spec has three

CfC: publish FPWD of Selection API; deadline Sept 30

Ryosuke proposes WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of Selection API and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following Editor's Draft as the basis (draft FPWD is [1]): This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group

Re: [selection-api] Moving toward First Public Working Draft

On 9/22/14 3:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I think the latest documentation is pretty complete except it’s missing one major feature: selection.modify [1]. There was a discussion that took place in WHATWG [2] and there was a disagreement on the use case and the purpose of this particular API amon

CfC: Publishing Uniform Messaging Policy (UMP) as a WG Note; deadline Sept 27

All - I just noticed the Uniform Messaging Policy (UMP) [TR] (which WebApps abandoned several years ago) was never published as a WG Note, thus someone could mistakenly think the spec is still in development. To help prevent such a mistake, this is a Call for Consensus to: a) publish a WG Note

[selection-api] Moving toward First Public Working Draft

Hi Ryosuke, Ben, Kenji, All, I'm looking for feedback about moving the Selection API [ED] to First Public Working Draft (FPWD) ... A `rule of thumb` I generally use when considering if a spec is ready for a FPWD is if the feature set is mostly complete although there is no expectation all fe

Re: [admin] Towards making ED boilerplates more useful and consistency

On 9/10/14 10:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi Editors, All, Speaking of ED boilerplate data ... do we want to try to get some consistency regarding boilerplate data in our EDs? We have

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Clipboard API and events on Sept 18

On 9/15/14 4:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us know before the 18th. Although there were some technical comments in reply to this PSA (and that's great, please keep the comments coming!), as we previously agreed, those com

Re: PSA: Extensible Web Summit in Berlin September 11

On 7/9/14 4:15 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ Bcc: public-pointer-events ] FYI, Robin reports the availability of minutes from the September 11 EWS in Berlin: [[ as you may know, last week the second edition of the "Extensible Web Summit" took place in Berlin. It was fun an interest

PSA: publishing new WD of Clipboard API and events on Sept 18

This is a heads-up Hallvord intends to publish a WD of "Clipboard API and events" and he is targeting a publication date of September 18. The ED If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us know before the 18th.

CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis: The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement an

PSA: publishing new WD of URL spec

[ Sorry for the cross-posting but this is about a joint WD publication between WebApps and TAG. ] This is heads-up (aka PublicServiceAnnoucement) about the intent to publish a new WD of the URL spec (on or around Sept 16) using this ED as the basis: As previ

[TPAC2014] Reminder: f2f meeting registration deadline is October 8

This is a reminder WebApps will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 27 and 28) during [TPAC2014]. Registration for WebApps' meeting (as well as all other meetings and events that week) is mandatory. The registration deadline is October 8. The

Re: PFWG request for abstract and introductions

Hi Michael, All, Thanks for your e-mail. I'm _really_ sorry for the delayed reply [this email was accidentally moved to my "Back Burner" folder where I just noticed it)! Although I will check all of WebApps' specs and ask Editors to update their documents accordingly, are there any specs tha

[admin] Towards making ED boilerplates more useful and consistency

Hi Editors, All, Speaking of ED boilerplate data ... do we want to try to get some consistency regarding boilerplate data in our EDs? We have quite a bit of variation now. For example Clipboard and others are toward the more minimalist end of the spectrum:

[admin] Revised Proposed changes regarding references to editors' drafts

Original Message Subject: [Pubrules] Revised Proposed changes regarding references to editors' drafts Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:13:48 -0500 From: Ian Jacobs To: spec-p...@w3.org Prod CC: Arthur Barstow , Marcos Caceres Hello spec-prod, Several months ago I send a lis

Re: {Spam?} Re: [xhr]

On 9/3/14 8:25 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: That I think what is unclear from the writing of the warning are two things: Per the specs' "Participate" boilerplate, perhaps you should file a bug (^1). -Thanks, AB ^1

Re: {Spam?} Re: [xhr]

On 9/2/14 9:10 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: Sorry. As with showModalDialog() we would really like to make this > feature disappear. I realize this makes some forms of code generation > harder, but hopefully you can find a way around that in time. Perhaps we should s

RfC: LCWD of Battery Status API; deadline October 2

WebApps received a Request for Comments re DAPWG's August 28 Last Call WD of Battery Status API (last published as a [CR], see [Diff]): Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. If anyone in WebApps wants to pro

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

On 8/27/14 7:33 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 8/27/14, 4:50 PM, Daniel Appelquist wrote: with a few minimal editorial changes. What are the changes, specifically? The following service indicates only the boilerplate (start of doc through the Status of the Document section) plus a change in th

[streams-api] Seeking status of the Streams API spec

lic/public-sysapps/2014Jun/0014.html>. -Thanks, AB Original Message Subject:RE: Update on Streams API Status Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:57:05 + From: Paul Cotton To: Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@gmail.com) , Charles McCathie Nevile (cha...@yandex-team.ru

RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18

[ Bcc: www-tag, public-script-coord, public-web-security, public-web-mobile ; please Reply-to: public-webapps ] Hi All, Marcos and Mounir, the Editors of WebApps' Screen Orientation API, consider their spec feature complete with only a few minor [Bugs] open. As such, we seek wide review on th

PSA: Extensible Web Summit in Berlin September 11

[ Bcc: public-pointer-events ] On 7/8/14 6:50 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote: ... to continue the energy of the Extensible Web Summit in San Francisco [1], W3C is helping to organize the Extensible Web Summit on September 11, 2014, in Berlin, Germany. The summit is designed to bring in platform de

Fwd: RFC723x (replace RFC2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1)

Editors - please see Yves' e-mail re RFC2616 replacement and update your spec(s) accordingly. -Thanks, AB Original Message Subject: RFC723x (replace RFC2616 - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1) Resent-Date:Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:19:52 + Resent-From:cha...@w3.o

[streams-api] FYI, some status from Domenic

FYI, if you are interested in some status of Streams, here's some info from Domenic:

Re: WebIDL Spec Status

On 6/25/14 11:58 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: In the case of WebIDL, my personal preference would be to not spend precious effort on WebIDL 1 CR, but instead to: (1) publish WebIDL 1 CR as a WG Note without attempting to resolve outstanding issues, other than by clearly annotating the existence of

Re: WebIDL Spec Status

On 6/24/14 5:28 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: I've put Web IDL work on my list of Q3 goals, so I will resume work on it next month. I still think that before publishing another draft on TR/ that we should resolve the open issues that apply to v1. Boris and I will be dividing up the open issue

PSA: LCWD of Beacon spec published; deadline July 29

This is a PSA regarding the publication of a LCWD of the Beacon API: WebApps wasn't specifically asked to review the LCWD but I wanted to mention it since this spec was previously discussed in this group. If you have any comments, please send t

FYI: IETF Webpush Proposed charter

FYI. Original Message Subject:Fwd: [Webpush] Proposed charter Resent-Date:Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:37:30 + Resent-From:www-...@w3.org Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:37:24 +0100 From: Daniel Appelquist To: TAG List FYI - there is a group forming in IETF (We

Re: WebIDL Spec Status

On 6/23/14 4:04 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: What is the plan, i.e., schedule timeline, for moving WebIDL to REC? We have now a two year old CR that appears to be stuck and a 2nd Edition that I'm not sure has made it to FPWD. Hi Glenn, All, I don't have any new info re v1 beyond what Boris said a f

RfC: OASIS' Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) WebSocket Binding (WSB) Version 1.0; deadline 19 July

Below is an request for comments for OASIS' "Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) WebSocket Binding (WSB) Version 1.0" Community Specification Draft: If you have any comments, please submit them by J

RfC: LCWD of 'HTML Media Capture', 'Ambient Light Events' and 'Vibration API'; deadline 24 July

WebApps has been asked to review three LCWDs published by DAPWG: * HTML Media Capture - * Ambient Light Events - * Vibration API -

[TPAC2014] Registration Now Open for October 27-31 meeting week; deadline Oct 8

Registration is now open for the October 27-31 Technical Plenary and all Working Group meeting week: WebApps will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 27 and 28). Registration for WebApps' meeting (as well as any other meetings and events that

CfC: to add Robust Anchoring API to WebApps' charter; deadline June 23

u need? Regards- -Doug On 5/14/14 8:54 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/25/14 8:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Art– There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annot

Re: PSA: publishing FPWD of D3E KeyboardEvent {key,code} Values specs and WD of UI Events

On 5/28/14 10:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ Bcc: public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom ] As previously discussed, Gary and Travis have moved the D3E event key and codes from the D3E and UI Events specs to the following new specs: FYI, these three docs were published today: http://www.w3

Re: [webcomponents]: Telcon on as-needed basis from now on

On 6/9/14 12:09 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: I think it might be best to flip the "regular" bit to "off" for now, and only use this time slot when we have other participants. Thus, consider the weekly call cancelled unless there's an announcement otherwise. That sounds like a good plan Dimitri.

Re: [admin] Process/Policy/Expectations for spec-specific distributed meetings

On 6/4/14 10:41 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/WorkMode#Meetings.3F_What_Meetings.3F> I just added an important point to the above doc related to decisions at meetings. This point is a c-&-p of the following text in the group's charter: [[

Re: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

On 6/6/14 8:39 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: I am a big fan of the giant warning at the bottom of the document. Will it be maintained in the published version? That would be ideal. My current plan is to submit the document for publication `as is`. That said, I do think a small part of the expan

PSA: publish new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

This is a heads-up that Hayato-san created a draft WD of Shadow DOM and the plan is to publish it on June 12: If anyone has any comments or concerns about this plan, please let us know by June 9 at the latest. -Than

Re: [editing] CommandQuery Object and Event

On 6/5/14 1:42 PM, Ben Peters wrote: From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com] Can this be an attribute on elements instead? Otherwise, browsers would have to repeatedly call these functions to update edit menu, etc... This may be an issue, I agree. But since it's dynamic and changes every t

Re: Editing Conference Call June 6th

On 6/4/14 11:42 AM, Ben Peters wrote: There will be a conference call on June 6th at 08:00 (8am) San Francisco time (PST) to discuss the recent editing topics contentEditable=minimal and CommandEvent[1]. We will be on #webapps with Zakim and will send minutes to this list. The pin and further

[admin] Process/Policy/Expectations for spec-specific distributed meetings

Hi All, Yesterday I received a request to hold a "spec-specific distributed meeting", with the expectation the meeting would use the #webapps IRC channel as well as the Consortium's voice conference system. Although I fully support this proposal, and encourage all Editors and active contribut

RfC: Last Call WD of "Encoding"; deadline July 1

All, This is a Request for Comments for the June 3 "Encoding" specification that WebApps was asked to review: Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official group resp

Re: File API - Writer suspension

On 6/2/14 11:28 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Julian Ladbury > wrote: I fail to understand why work on this API has been suspended. Just to be clear, by “this API” I think you mean: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/file-sys

[admin] Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions [Was: Fwd: Re: CommandEvent for user intentions]

Hi Piotr, All, This is a reminder the W3C's Patent Policy has a goal of assuring W3C Recommendations can be implemented Royalty-Free and this requires all spec contributions include a commitment to that policy. This topic was last discussed in September 2013 and I encourage all Contributors an

Re: WebApps and permission list?

On 5/31/14 3:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I have a question about WebApps manifests and permissions. The page is part of Manifest for Web Applications located at http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/manifest/. The document provides a permission member and the following description: The permission

CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline June 4

[ Bcc public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom] Two bugs were raised against the May 1 LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization [LC]. Travis created a tracking document for these Bugs [Track] and considers the two patches ([P1] and [P2]) that address the comments as non-substantive. As such, he p

PSA: publishing FPWD of D3E Keyboard {key,code} Values specs and WD of UI Events

[ Bcc: public-webapps; please Reply-to: www-dom ] As previously discussed, Gary and Travis have moved the D3E event key and codes from the D3E and UI Events specs to the following new specs: * DOM Level 3 KeyboardEvent key Values

Re: [charter] Joint work with TAG on their Packaging on the Web spec?; deadline May 21

On 5/14/14 2:46 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: NOTE: in the absence of any non-resolvable feedback, this proposal will carry i.e. [3] will be updated to include this joint spec. FYI, this has been done. (I also explicitly added the Selection API and made a couple of additional edits based on

Re: CfC: to create a new developer's list for WebApps' specs; deadline May 28

On 5/21/14 10:47 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: I've kind of thought of Web Platform Docs as the developer end of things and w3c specs for implementers and wgs - is it possible to set something up under that banner? Perhaps; I haven't followed WPD so if anyone has data about its actual usage by

Re: CfC: to create a new developer's list for WebApps' specs; deadline May 28

On 5/21/14 11:17 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: I've been in several discussions on this topic over the past months, a good example of which is: https://twitter.com/tobie/status/457075677851037696 In reaction to that, I'm running an experiment to hold such discussions in a manner that may prove

IndexedDB >> Proposed API Change: cursor.advance BACKWARD when direction is "prev"

[ Bcc www-tag ; Marc - please use public-webapps for IDB discussions ] On 5/20/14 7:46 PM, marc fawzi wrote: Hi everyone, I've been using IndexedDB for a week or so and I've noticed that cursor.advance(n) will always move n items forward regardless of cursor direction. In other words, when th

Re: CfC: to create a new developer's list for WebApps' specs; deadline May 28

On 5/21/14 7:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Developers seem to complain about us using mailing lists to communicate rather than GitHub or some other centralized platform that is not email. Might be worth checking with them first. Yes, good point Anne. I tweeted this Q with some tags that were

CfC: to create a new developer's list for WebApps' specs; deadline May 28

Hi All, About two years ago I proposed in [1] creating a new list (f.ex. public-webapps-devs) that is targeted toward developers using WebApps' specs. Such a list would be used by developers using the APIs (as opposed to implementers) as well as other related purposes such as announcing relev

[webcomponents] Minutes from 20 May 2014 call

The minutes from the May 20 Web Components call are available at the following and copied below: If anyone has any corrections, please reply to this e-mail. -Thanks, ArtB W3C - DRAFT - WebApps / Web Components

[charter] Joint work with TAG on their Packaging on the Web spec?; deadline May 21

[ Bcc: www-tag; please Reply-to: public-webapps ] Hi All, In case you did not know, the TAG has been working on a "Packaging (format) on the Web" spec [1]. They have an initial draft they believe is ready for FPWD [2]. However, due to the IP constraints of the TAG's charter, they cannot curre

Re: [charter] Addressable Ranges?

On 4/25/14 8:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Art– There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annotator [1]. https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/ OK, so at this

[push] protocol drafts

Hi Martin, Doug, I noticed there are two drafts related to push protocol: What are the plans and expectations for these specs (f.ex. do they address different use cas

PSA: First Public Working Draft of Service Workers published

The First Public Working Draft of Service Workers was published today: Congrats Jungkee and Alex and thanks to Philippe for preparing the `pub ready` version. -AB

Re: [push-api] Push API draft migrated to the W3C GitHub repo

On 5/5/14 12:51 PM, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote: Push API draft has been migrated to the W3C GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/push-api And this means the ED is now .

Re: [webcomponents]: Regular Conference Call Survey

On 5/1/14 5:13 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I'm not, however, opposed to others having such conference calls as long as minutes/summary of discussions are posted on the mailing list. The expectation is the meeting will be announced at least 24 hours in advance and that minutes will be taken in #we

RfC: LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline May 22

[ Bcc: public-webapps and public-html-admin; please Reply-to: www-dom ] WebApps requests comments on the May 1 Last Call Working Draft of "DOM Parsing and Serialization (DOMParser, XMLSerializer, innerHTML, and similar APIs)": If you hav

Re: [admin] putting Push API in W3C's Github repo [Was: Re: Progress on Push API]

On 4/30/14 1:19 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, at 1:50, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote: On 30 abr 2014 at 16:52:49, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/30/14 10:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: I'll work with Mike/Robin to create a new "push-api" project, unless you reques

Re: [admin] putting Push API in W3C's Github repo [Was: Re: Progress on Push API]

On 4/30/14 10:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: I'll work with Mike/Robin to create a new "push-api" project, unless you request otherwise. OK? Eduardo - Mike created this project <https://github.com/w3c/push-api>.

[admin] putting Push API in W3C's Github repo [Was: Re: Progress on Push API]

On 4/30/14 3:25 AM, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote: We developing the new version at [1], though not yet updated with the changes in my previous email. But if may be a good idea to migrate is to the W3C GitHub official repo. Hi Eduardo, WebApps already has a few specs using github.org/W3C so t

[admin] Please use IRC and #webapps for ad hoc "meetings"

Hi All, In addition to what Chaals said below, when folks meet to discuss WebApps' specs, please do use the #webapps channel to record the discussion (log is at [1]). There are a number of "cheat sheets" re the IRC bots (f.ex. [2]) so please do use those bots and if desired, we can easily as

RfC: LCWD of Tracking Preference Expression (DNT); deadline June 18

Hi All, The Tracking Protection WG asked WebApps to review their April 24 LCWD of "Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)" so this is a Request for Comments: Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. If anyone i

Re: [charter] Addressable Ranges?

On 4/22/14 9:40 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Art– There are different approaches that could be taken, but one concrete implementation in JavaScript is from the Hypothes.is Annotator [1]. https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/ OK, so at this point, I think it would be helpful if you would

[admin] public-webapps-testsuite is now Closed

As discussed a few weeks ago, public-webapps-testsuite is now closed and all previous subscribers have been unsubscribed. For all testing related discussions specific to WebApps, please use the public-webapps list and infrastructure type discussions, please use the public-test-infra list. -

Re: [charter] Addressable Ranges?

Hi Doug, Do you have some prior art/work for this functionality (that could help people get a bit deeper understanding of the proposal)? All - if you have any feedback - both positive/+1 or negative - please do speak up by April 25 at the latest. -Thanks, AB On 4/18/14 3:45 PM, Doug Schepe

Re: [selection] [editing] Selection API Bugzilla is available

> Are there any objections? If not, we will be moving some bugs over (in case you're tracking them). Ben - thanks for the heads-up. I think you should go ahead and move them. -Thanks, AB On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ben Peters wrote: > The Selection API Bugzilla component [1] is now avail

CfC: publish LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline April 25

Travis has now closed the last open bug [1] for DOM Parsing and Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of the spec, using the following ED as the basis: This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "re

Re: An error in document "http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/"

On 4/18/14 10:53 AM, ext Xiaoqian Cindy Wu wrote: on 18/04/2014 02:59, Marcos Caceres wrote: On April 17, 2014 at 12:21:06 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: I also noticed: the REC has a link to an ED that now 404s and the errata doc has a link to a "differences document&

Re: An error in document "http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/"

On 4/17/14 12:09 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On April 17, 2014 at 5:46:17 AM, Wang, Peter H (peter.h.w...@intel.com) wrote: Hi all, I’ve found a small error in document http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/. In “7.12.4 Example of Usage”: 古老瓷地图 Ancient Chinese Maps should be 古老中国地图 Ancient Chinese

Re: Screen Orientation Status

On 4/4/14 3:29 PM, ext Lars Knudsen wrote: what happened to the initiative to take a holistic view on DeviceOrientation, Media Queries and orientation lock all together? Hi Lars, Based on the minutes from today's Web Mobile meeting [1], it appears you and others have found a venue to discuss

CfC: publish FPWD of Service Workers; deadline April 18

Alex and Jungkee propose WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of Service Workers and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following Editor's Draft as the basis: This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "

Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

On 4/10/14 11:41 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I've uploaded the first cut the selection API specification unofficial draft at https://github.com/rniwa/selection-api Wow, that was quick; thanks! To facilitate review, I think it would be helpful if you would please create a `directly readable`

[April2014Meeting] Draft minutes for April 10

art LC2 ... CfC to stop work on File API specs. ... no one objected Ryo:any test on DOM P&S *ACTION:*barstow update testing info in PubStatus for DOM P&S spec [recorded inhttp://www.w3.org/2014/04/10-webapps-minutes.html#action01] Created ACTION-714 - Update testing info in pubstatu

Re: [April2014Meeting] New PushAPI ED uploaded

Thanks for this information Bryan! Yesterday, Jungkee and Wonsuk said they would like to discuss Push API during today's meeting and suggested a good time slot would be after the Service Worker slot (which is 13:30-14:30). Can you join via Zakim at 14:30(+) today? I've tentatively updated the a

[admin] WebApps and the Proposed changes to the TR Process

TL;DR: April 21 is the deadline for comments for LC#2 of a revised Technical Reports (TR) process . If you have any comments about LC#2 itself, please send them to the public-w3process list

Re: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

On 4/9/14 1:06 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: On 4/9/14 11:19 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote: On 04/09/2014 09:10 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: My recollection is that during the TPAC2013 meeting, Jonas said that functionality was implemented so yes, it would be good if someone would please clarify

Re: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

On 4/9/14 11:19 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote: On 04/09/2014 09:10 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: My recollection is that during the TPAC2013 meeting, Jonas said that functionality was implemented so yes, it would be good if someone would please clarify the situation and plan. Gecko doesn't

Re: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

On 4/9/14 10:19 AM, ext Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote: From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com] * IDB: Zhiqiang; test suite status; plan to create an Implementation Report I've reviewed the open pull requests and moved all tests into https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/m

Re: [April2014Meeting] Seeking status and plans from Editors not attending meeting; deadline April 9

On 4/8/14 10:33 PM, ext Kinuko Yasuda wrote: On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Arthur Barstow <mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com>> wrote: * Quota: Kinuko Spec status: working on an ED to address TAG feedback. Probably we need further discussion on some of the specific request

Re: [clipboard-apis] spec status

On 4/8/14 2:22 PM, ext Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote: So - regarding the short status, plans, expectations and such for your spec(s). Some details are still being discussed with implementors (special thanks to Ben Peters at Microsoft for bringing up issues recently). In particular, it's still s

Re: [April2014Meeting] Building an Issue and Bug focused agenda

On 4/9/14 12:03 AM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote: Would the WG be willing to put Web Components related topics on Friday when building the agenda? (Note: there are at least some Apple folks who will be there both days in any case.) On Apr 8, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Dimitri Glazkov

Re: Should events be preferably sent to the Window or the nearest object?

On 4/7/14 5:33 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote: On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, at 8:37, Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Marcos Caceres wrote: On March 20, 2014 at 2:30:55 PM, Marcos Caceres (w...@marcosc.com) wrote: On March 20, 2014 at 12:58:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: Agreed. The exact target isn

[testing] "unstable" tests: eventsource, workers, websockets, webmessaging, webstorage

James identified tests "that aren't producing consistent results" . For WebApps, the test suites indentified are: eventsource, workers, websockets, webmessaging and webstorage. Please review these tests and if needed, create an issue and/or submit a fix

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >