Martyn Hill wrote:
> I guess I am missing some understanding of the way PE windows work -
> what I would like to achieve is to treat the job 0 windows in the same
> way as any other job and have them hidden by the QDT desktop whenever
> QDT is brought to the top, just as one might click 'Show Desk
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
> But, actually, it's a good question. If Windows did mount a third USB
> floppy as, say, F: would QPC mount it as FLP3_?
No, QPC supports only 2 FLP drives.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
gdgqler wrote:
>> ... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
>> do and what not.
> I would have said the same until, a long time ago, I found someone
> using my code, usefully, for a purpose I had not imagined.
That can happen, but the difference here is that the SMSQ
matras...@aol.com wrote:
> Yes he has, but I will try George's suggestion just in case, as it
> will only take a miniscule amount of time to try and if it delivers
... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
> Its a pity that QPC2 does not support dire
John Sadler wrote:
> You can have your QXL win files anywhere you ike by editing the dos executable
> with a suitable dos editor.
> That is what I have done and so I keep my QXL files in a seperate parition and
> directory.
Well, you could also turn it into a Tetris game if you hex edit enough
of
matras...@aol.com wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
> channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Nope, no way, sorry.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.ht
P Witte wrote:
> Of course this isnt half as clever as it looks, as nowadays you arnt
> guaranteed (AFAIK) that ALCHP wont return a negative address.
Is that so? ALCHP returns a memory address, so at least on QPC you
would have to have more than 2GB of memory to achieve this. On MMU
based systems
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> It's so long since I last used a QXL, can anyone tell me if the QXL
> has DOS drives (like QPC2's DOS1_ etc)?
No, that's a QPC exclusive. Until quite recently even the WIN devices
were hard-linked (WIN1 -> C:\QXL.WIN, WIN2 -> D:\QXL.WIN etc.)
Marcel
___
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> I just have received Vol14 Issue 1 of QL-Today. Oh dear, I have eaten the 11
> pages of Tony's first article in a rush...just to find out that I want more.
Damn, it didn't arrive her in time, starting very early tomorrow I'll
be away for a week. Well, will have to wait for th
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
> I'm running QPC II 3.34 beta 3 on Vista, working on some upgrades to
> the utilities that I wrote many years ago. Does anyone know if there
> is a fix for SysMon 2.03? - it starts up OK but then just displays a
> blank window.
Yes, latest release was 2.09 and that should wo
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Do a booking search from http://hotels.luzern.com for a triple room, and
> you get CHF160 per night for the *room* including breakfast.
> Going through to the booking, including city tax for two days that comes
> to a total of CHF330.50 for three people and breakfast.
> See h
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Bed and breakfast is E20 less per room per day.
> Mind you E10 per person for diner is good value - for Friday only of
> course!
No no, it's not 100 EUR per room but 100 EUR per person. Without diner
it comes to 80 EUR per person. A bit expensive for my taste. Is there
any
Tony Firshman wrote:
>> Wow, that is 2 countries and over 700km away from the venue. Are you
>> sure you want to stay there?
>>
>>
> (8-)#
>
> Are you coming Marcel.
It's only 300km for me, in QL meeting terms that's practically next
door ;-) , so I intend to attend, yes. Haven't booked any
acc
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Dilwyn and Ann are at http://www.villamaria.cz/english.htm and Simon
> Goodwin and I could well be there too. It is one of the Urs recommended
> ones.
Wow, that is 2 countries and over 700km away from the venue. Are you
sure you want to stay there?
Marcel
Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> I tried Clavier_obj (but it is too old for SMQSQ/E v3, obviously),
Is it? The latest Clavier should work fine, I think.
Frankly, the key mapping is somewhat of a mystery to me, on Linux
there are so many layer that somehow tamper with the keyboard input
that I can't real
Tony Firshman wrote:
>>> After some weeks if not months of evaluation and talks of what's
>>> next in the QL is 25 storyline I’m very happy to announce that an
>>> international "QL & Mac are 25" event will be hosted in Lucerne,
>>> Switzerland on Sat/Sun Oct 31-Nov 1, 2009.
> That sounds interesti
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> I think I pestered Marcel a bit with the app window stuff and I rather think
> he got a bit fed up of me finding obscure little oddities happending! Fair
> play, Marcel has laboured long and hard with Easyptr to make it the great
> programming tool that it is. Marcel never co
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Is this RECOL bug something which might get updated in time, or is MODE 8
> redundant as far as you are concerned?
The fix is one additional line of code and thus beyond simple. The
question is just when a new SMSQ/E release gets released. Doing a new
release just for RECOL t
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
>> It is highly unlikely that the program includes its own MDV access
>> code, so the entries to the MDV vectors might be a good starting
>> point.
> Hmm, the programmers at "Pyramide" were very clever;-)
It's just a starting point. As somebody who has written and cracked a
aup...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
> I was playing around with the disassembler on QemuLator, and am
> prepared to spend time working on this - do you think removing the
> protection is an achievable aim (I have some programming knowledge,
> and a basic grasp of assembly language, but very little knowledg
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> RECOL #0,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,0 turns white to blue instead of black
> RECOL #0,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,2 turns white to magenta instead of red
> RECOL #0,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,4 turns white to cyan instead of green
> RECOL #0,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,6 turns white to white instead of yellow
>
> and so on. Anybo
Daniele Terdina wrote:
> [The QL User Manual implies that COPY also copies the headers, as
> there is a COPY_N command to copy without headers, but it doesn't
> seem to work that way]
Well, COPY does copy the header if it can, i.e. if the target device
supports headers. If not, it behaves exactly
Arnould wrote:
> I did something like this in 1986/87 but only for pure ASCII text
> files. After the file was copied over, the PC still needed an end of
> file control code to understand what happened, CTRL+Z I think, wich
> had to be sent manually with something like:
That's what the "z" in "ser
aup...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
> I think what's going on is that there's a combination of characters
> within the file body that is being interpreted as an EOF (ctrl-z).
Yes, you can't transfer binary files this way as there is no way of
knowing when the file ends. You'd have to abort the COPY comman
Rich Mellor wrote:
> Also does anyone have the ROM for 68K/OS - now there is a blast from the
> QL's past. I have 2 microdrive cartridges labelled 68K/ASM and 68K/OS
> but I cannot read either on the QL - I guess you need the ROM installed
> to read the format!
I have the ROMs on an additional ha
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Marcel's website still lists Wolfgang's site, so I guess we'll have to wait
> until Wolfgang tells us what's happening.
I also just noticed that it disappeared 2 days ago. I have no idea.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://ww
matras...@aol.com wrote:
> I have acquired the Black Knight Chess Program. I was informed it
> would not work on modern QL systems but have found that it will when
> the memory in the system is reduced. That is Black Knight will not
> run unless memory is reduced to 8MB or less, if this is done it
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Both can see a folder called SharedDocs on Computer C, but
> attempting to view files fails with the error message telling me I
> do not have permission to access it, yet I have set sharing on for
> SharedDocs on C, configured the firewalls to allow printer/file
> sharing, run
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Hmm, does this explain, why the little window of Qtyp does not disappear an
> T87's window get restored?
Sure. That's what it all was about, wasn't it?
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Ok, wee need a statement from Marcel (the Whodini of text87 in GD2 ;-)).
Well, I was simply not aware of the problem. I've allocated an hour to
check this out and fortunately I could do it in this time. It's just a
bug in one of my calculations.
The problem with the cursor n
Andy Barber wrote:
> Warning! I got a Virus alert when I downloaded the file!
I'd rather believe there's something wrong with your PC or virus
scanner than believing Mark publishes an infected file. ;-) (the file
is signed and thus cannot be manipulated without Windows noticing).
Seriously, it's
P Witte wrote:
> I prefer Process Explorer, available from
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/default.aspx
Process Explorer (sister application of the Process Monitor I
mentioned) is always a good idea if you want to replace the Windows
Task Manager (I did). But massive HD activity
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> The FileOpen etc activity seems to be caused by a 'softmodem' and the
> wireless RaLink card. Even when turned off and not connected to the router.
Well, whatever this is, try to kill the process that causes all those
lines and see whether it helps. Take the exakt task name "
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Help. My laptop has been driving me mad today with the constant
> disk activity. I've spent most of the day trying to find out what is going on
> and drawn a blank.
Check out ProcMon, it will perhaps tell you what caused the activity:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysi
Andy Barber wrote:
>>I have downloaded the torrent and wow, this is a very cool collection.
>
> Where do I get the torrent?
The link was in the original article I answered to.
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4636229/Sinclair_QL_documents_manuals_and_magazines
Marcel
sinclairql.es wrote:
> More than 100 manuals, books and magazines (yes, in English) that have
> gone through the scanner with better or worse luck in terms of quality
> concerns, but that insurance will be useful for the community because
> this material years ago which has started to dwindle and u
Very nice presentation Urs. But what's the story behind the David Karlin
picture?
Cheers, Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote:
> Suspecting my problems could be caused by some other extensions my boot
> program loads, I tried a clean boot with only QLiberator runtimes -
> still no luck.
I had a quick jab at debugging the problem. As far as I can see this
is a race condition.
The main j
Norman Dunbar wrote:
>> Of course, that way would be very slow. Hmm, does anyone know, how this
>> works in Windows? No flicker or anything else. How do they do it?
>
> Charles Petzold (Petzhold?) is your friend!
>
> In Windows, when the window is being dragged around, a message is sent
> to the ap
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Yes, the loose menu item select was done in Basic of course (ok, therefor
> CURSEN/CURDIS, if no PE is present), but how did they manage the "outline"
> of the loose item, when the pointer is above?
It's a simple WINDOW followed by a BORDER call.
> How have you investigated
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> many years ago, I was thinking about the way, QLib handles it's own
> "Applikation Window" under PE. I do not really think, it heavily uses WMAN,
> but I always wanted to know, how it does, what it does.
Actually it doesn't use WMAN at all. They've implemented their own
littl
gdgqler wrote:
>> Had that at first, too. But after the first click (when you get the
>> sprite), click again and keep holding the mouse button.
> I think the "manual" says this.
Actually I didn't get how you meant it in the README, especially as
the behaviour is somewhat unexpected (being used to
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> A, you have configured blk2_bin as standard;-)). OK, it works. Is it
> possible to give thin lines for the new size? I just see the little sprite.
Had that at first, too. But after the first click (when you get the
sprite), click again and keep holding the mouse butto
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> OK, a clean QPC 3.33 also gave Ill.ins.
I guess you haven't configured tresze_bin correctly. It needs to know
the location of blk_bin and doesn't seem to fail gracefully if it is
not found. This would have been a good candidate for the "home
directory" functionality of later
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Hmm, I discover a problem when tapping the resize button of tresze_bin in
> getting an Ill.ins. from QMON. I am running QPC v3.32 with QDT and the usual
> other stuff loaded. I have to try it with a clean QPC.
I guess George uses 68020+ instructions, try QPC2 v3.33 or later.
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Yes, I know. My point being that Prowess was built on top of WMAN wasn't
> it?
Actually it's more of a replacement for WMAN and as such I don't think
so. Actually I'm 99,9% sure, bit it's been a long time for me, too.
All in all WMAN is just a collection of routines running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure how I should use/call QPCPrint from QPC to get it to
> print, I seem to be missing something somehow ( is it old age ), I
> did not download and install the redmon thing as I only want to
> print from QPC. In the ser/par settings I have set Par1 to "Printer"
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> If I want load (e.g. in an editor) a file from another directory, I simply
> use e.g. "flp1_\anotherdir_source_asm". Maybe not the most elegant way, but
> it works.
Then you have again a 36 character limit, have you not?
Marcel
__
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Hmm, why have all apps to know, where they are?
They don't need to know where they are, but most apps I use work with
files, be it source-code, spread-sheets, word-processor documents, you
name it.
> If the system let them believe, they are in their root (if
> necessary), th
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Ok, to be really honest, I can think of one reason - someone will have
> to write it as part of SMSQ.
Yes, that and that basically ALL applications would have to be updated
to make use of the new facilities. Difficult to pull off. One more
reason was the cry for staying QDOS
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> It cannot cope with the new High colour window definitions, palettes and
> so on, only the old fashioned (!) mode 4 and mode 8 stuff. But once you
> get the initial menu definition converted, substituting palette entries
> is easy enough.
Of course there is also the EP4 vers
Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> Thierry.
Wow, a blast from the past. Good to see you around :-)
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> I don't know what has happenned with the Quanta logo image, one of those
> odds things that it doesn't open now. As it was not changed.
Many web servers are case sensitive when it comes to file names. In
this case you refer to the logo as "Quanta.gif" in the HTML, but it
s
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> There is no problem with printing from Xchange etc which ave their own
> configurable drivers. The real problem comes for jobs like SBASIC e.g. when
> I want to print a listing. I can of course send the codes from something
> like Norman's PrinterMaster 2, but using that, ther
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I want to put the default sprites for move, sleep, wake, resize etc into
> loose items so that I don't end up having the clunky mode 4 sprites
> showing when I'm in high colour and so on.
The document Per pointed to answers it all (of course, as I wrote it
;-) ). But the sor
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
>> did you try using "parda" as device (d stands for "no translations
>> used")
>> Otherwise the SMSQ translation tables might garble your control codes.
> Hmm, the QPC manual state, it does not translate (page 10).
In that sentence a different kind of translation is meant (the
George Gwilt wrote:
> I have never before used this trap but have just now tried it out. It
> appears that you have to put the return address on the (user) stack
> before Trap #1 otherwise the return is to whatever happens to be on
> the user stack which can be rather nasty.
Yes, the normal sc
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> What has to be converted and why? Old routines...?
P.S.: And as to the "why", you usually have your sprites in one bitmap
format and the video screen in a different pixel format.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.d
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> What has to be converted and why? Old routines...?
Colours.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> Hmm, but I think, it is not so easy to detect collision and similar things,
> isn't it? That was easy with DP's SSG.
That's why I write "If sprite drawing is the only thing you need".
There is no up-to-date sprite drawing library that I'm aware of.
Though collision detection
Engstler Karsten wrote:
> is there any extnsions to SuperBasic or packages for C who provide
> sprite for game programming on the QL ?
Depends on what you need. If sprite drawing is the only thing you
need, I'd recommend to simply "abuse" the PE sprite routines. This way
you get colour depth (=mac
Actually I was going to write something about this yesterday, too.
Wine 1.0 has been released a week ago and my tests so far were pretty
promising. It worked very well, even though I was only able to check
it out from work over a remote connection, i.e. the PC running QPC was
10km away! Still it wa
desin wrote:
> System QPC
> Program Xchange 3.90L/N
> Easel/Abacus
>
> date(0)
> date(1)
> date(2)
>
> gives wrong date eg. 28/-1/2108
>
> can anyone reproduce this ?
This is a clash of the languages. Most abbreviated months are spelled
the same in English and German (like "Apr"), but May is "May"
John Gilpin wrote:
> "I have Question - though whether it can be answered may be a problem
> What is the possibility of QPC 3.34 being able to read/write 4MB Floppy
> Disks ??"
No, it was hard enough to get HD working reliably and as ED was never
really a thing on PC hardware there is no support f
James Hunkins wrote:
> Below is a log of the capture movie. I can forward the movie to you
> directly if it would help - 24k compressed. It shows the activity
> very well. Just let me know.
24k? That would be pretty small ;) I guess you mean 24M, but that
should be okay for my mailbox, too.
Per Witte wrote:
> Thanks. Just now I got 3 mails in return. The return information goes:
I'm at about 15 now and it gets more by the minute...
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
George Gwilt wrote:
> I notice that many people have a problem with fast cursor flashing.
Well, I only noticed 3, none of those running QPC under Windows. And I
currently do not have any further ideas in this area because the
things told do not add up:
- Fast key repeat and fast cursor flashing i
James Hunkins wrote:
> I can't imagine it using 100% of a CPUs band width unless it is
> running code without any pauses.
Well, of course it's running code without any pause! The only
alternative would be to artificially slow down the CPU emulation
(which, as said, is done when SMSQ/E is idle. But
Per Witte wrote:
> Might make a nice "QL" system with uQLx or XP and QPC. Probably couldnt
> handle Wine..
Wine per se doesn't need to be slower than a native Windows
environment. In some tests it is apparently even faster.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing
James Hunkins wrote:
> The problem is that the CPU meter is pegging and it kills my laptop
> battery. On my office computer I don't care.
That is not a bug, it's a feature. Previously QPC used 100% all the
time, only when I introduced the power saving option it throttles the
CPU emulations when S
James Hunkins wrote:
> I don't have PW or PL commands on my system so this fails to run.
It's a pure SBASIC program that specifically was written to not use
any outside keywords. As François wrote there might be a name clash
with a loaded toolkit, but then it's better to run the program on a
clean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Much faster than on Windows. On a very unscientific test, I counted
> about 20 cursor on-off cycles in about 8 seconds.
Could you (and anybody else having increased cursor blink frequency)
run this Basic program? Tell me what values it's printing (47 to 50 is
normal).
1
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> QPC needs RAW sector access to read/write floppies. Not sure whether
> WINE emulates this at all and cannot test as my server doesn't have a
> floppy drive.
Follow up: you might want to try creating two symlinks like
cd ~/.wine/dosdevices
ln -s /dev/fd0
Norman Dunbar wrote:
>> OK, so get 0.9.52
> Version 0.9.52 obtained and installed. QPC runs, slowly, and still gives
> repeating characters - but not all the time. It is now workable - sort of.
Hmm. Even on my trusty P3-600 server over a virtual VNC X session over
a WLAN link QPC ran pretty usable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, that's today's "something new" then. I had no idea that
> assembly under Linux would be so different to Windows. (Which
> assembler do you use on Windows by the way?)
It used to be TASM (Turbo Assembler), but when Borland discontinued it
and certain bugs made devel
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> I've typed this entire message in QD under QPC/Wine, then copied it to
> the scrap and ctrl-c'd it into the mail prog.
Good to know that it works for you. They are rewriting the graphics
part and I still got a problem with it on my desktop, but I've
submitted a but report
David McCann wrote:
> Could your software run under QemuLator? That works fine with Linux and
> I think it accepts SMSQ now.
Since when is there a Linux version of QemuLator?
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Up to XP at least, Windows 32 bit can address only 4GB of memory.
Not entirely true, using a processor feature called PAE (Physical
address extension) some Windows server version can address more memory
(up to 64GB). But in practise this will not help you because
application
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> A good theory, in practice it is let down by either the design of the
> Core Duo chip or the OS not utilising things properly - I'm not sure which.
>
> In a Core Duo, all accesses to the Input Output sub-systems *must* be
> done by the first core and only by the first core.
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> and I can almost hear Marcel groaning right now, I'm wondering what
> the possibility of getting a Linux version of QPC is?
>
> Do I hear the work 'slim' or even 'no chance at all' out there?
Actually I prefer "not a frigging chance" ;-) Not from me, anyway.
> I use QT4 for
Billy wrote:
> Is there an upgrade to a QPC version that works with Vista?
Yes, 3.34 beta 3 is on my site. Don't be fooled by the beta, nobody
has reported any problems so far.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
P Witte wrote:
> There are only 10 kinds of people: nerds, and the rest
I know that as "There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand
binary and those who don't".
In the same vain, why do some people celebrate Christmas on Halloween?
Because Dec 25 = Oct 31.
Get it? Yes, that hurts :-)
Ma
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> I then ran its setup.exe and decompressed a copy to the memory stick.
> When I started it, shock horror, it came up as a 'registered' version.
> So I unregistered it, and lo and behold my own registered copy also
> unregistered. Whichever you registered or unregistered, both
P Witte wrote:
> I thought it nicer just to have an icon in the root of the device
> rather than opening a folder first to locate the executable.. A batch
> file does the trick:
>
> /qpc2/qpc2.exe
>
> Problem is the console wont go away until I quit QPC2..
Using
start \qpc2\qpc2.exe
in the file
P Witte wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, what he said. ;-) Per's answer is right to the point.
> I can configure the shortcut to "start in" %CD%\QPC2\ (%CD% being a
> system variable for the current directory). However the "target" and
> icon locations appear, stupidly, to have to be specified exactly:
> K
hitchies wrote:
> To my surprise it appears to offer platforms for other (than MS's) OS's.
VirtualPC was originally not an MS product, they just bought the
company which made it (Connectix).
> I have no complaints re: QPC2, (thanks Marcel!) but I do not know enough to
> know if there is any advan
ZN wrote:
> The actual sharing is quite complex and effectively slows down the CPU
> access buy some 40% or so, unless there is shadowing involved, like with
> the GC and SGC.
[...]
Ah, look who's still alive :-) Thanks for the details, that was
interesting for me, too.
Marcel
_
Tony Firshman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Ich werde ab 20.08.2007 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
>> 27.08.2007.
>>
>> Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
> Could you please repeat this in English.
It's an automated message saying he's not in the office...
George Gwilt wrote:
>> PAR_WAIT (presumably something to do with parallel port)
> This is part of SMSQ/E but its definition is not in my QPC2 manual.
> The code seems to set a pause for a period of time. Perhaps the
> author knows what for?
That would be Tony.
According to the QDOS Cla
Palenicek Jan wrote:
> I am working on some timing critical routines for standard QL w/wo
> SandyQboard 512 (no GC, no Aurora). Do you know how is memory shared
> between CPU and ULA? Do you know how (if at all) is memory delayed
> when you need to access videoram at the same time ULA is accessing
David Gilham wrote:
> Hardware Q60 with 64meg memory visible to smsqe Physical memory 128M
> System SMSQE 3.13
> Qpac2 version 1.45
> It would seem that there is a maximum file which can be copied
> using the files menu of Qpac2. the maximum is just under 32M.
QPAC2 does not have any such limit,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Finally, are any of the QL Emulators now able to run under it ?
> I'm pretty sure QPC does, but I have a vague recollection of Marcel
> posting something here a while back about Vista. I can't remember what though
> !
Actually current QPC releases do not start under V
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Thanks Laurence. It's in SMSQ/E and a JM ROM on my Aurora, but I
> haven't tried a Minerva yet.
Actually it's not the LRESPR command but the RAM drive which has
this "feature". All other devices are okay.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Maili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have been trying the same syntax to open the channel I have used
> successfully on the Q60 to open direct sector access to CDROMs and FAT16
> formatted PC CF
> cards but does not work on QPC2 to access Qx0 formatted CF cards! I get
> error -1.
I'm afraid there is no w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What it was, was that the program I had written to copy files to the
> CF card on the Q60 made a mess of the DOS file date. So the file had
> a created date in 2087 - only got 1 digit wrong but it was enough.
> Once I removed the file created and last accessed dates from
Tony Firshman wrote:
>> Does anyone know the file structure of the Qx0 hard disk. Is it the same as
>> the QXL.win format?
>> Is there any documentation anywhere.
> I am sure Peter Graf will answer, but isn't it the same (or similar) to
> Qubide, and therefore Rebel?
No, QDOS Classic uses the QubI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Per. Have found I can also copy other files larger than 1Mb to Win1_.
> It leaves me puzzled as to what is going on as windows has no problem with
> the file
If you are using a virus scanner, try disabling it.
Marcel
___
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
>> almost there now ! :-)
>
> Both wrong.
>
CompactFlash-->>>CF/IDE adapter-->>Aurora
Oops, that should be
CompactFlash-->>CF/IDE adapter-->>QubIDE
of course...
Marcel
___
QL-Users
Neil Riley wrote:
CompactFlash--->>Pcmcia adaptor->IDE interface--> Aurora
>
> or
>
CompactFlash--->>Pcmcia adaptor->Aurora
>
> almost there now ! :-)
Both wrong.
CompactFlash-->>CF/IDE adapter-->>Aurora
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing
Neil Riley wrote:
> Thats a shame, we just got rid of a dozen or so of those PCMCIA compact
> flash cards, only a few Mb each though.
First of all, CompactFlash and PCMCIA are two separate things,
CompactFlash is the flash format and PCMCIA are the slots in notebooks
which can hold pretty much eve
601 - 700 of 933 matches
Mail list logo
