"Shane Wise" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to setup qmail with sendmail's Fallback MX host
option?
No, qmail doesn't need that capability since it's not a bloated,
inefficient pig. :-)
My
DSL line sometimes has problems with certain places and i would like to
route it out my ISDN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. A more devious hack might be to adjust the mtime of the info file to be
time() + QMAILQUEUELIFETIME - control/queuelifetime. The cost would be
much closer to zero then - albeit at the cost of a misleading info file...
And qmail-send would be using the tail end of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone help me, why sendmail is used to send mail although qmail is
running.
Because you didn't replace /usr/lib/sendmail and/or /usr/sbin/sendmail
with symlinks to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.
-Dave
"Kadre, Da" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone share with me how to customize the bounce messages and any other
default message wordings?
The only way to do that is to modify the source code and rebuild. If
you do modify the bounce message, *please* make sure your modification
conforms to
"Len Scotney"[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after 20 years with PCs/DOS/Win, i am now trying to help with something
completely new
Congratulations on having the gumption to try something new.
starting qmail execvp - no such file or directory ???
what worries me is that the history page for
Wilson Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to send an absent message but I am finding it difficult.
Grab qmail-vacation via the link on www.qmail.org.
-Dave
"Slider" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
another maildir as well as for him to get a copy to go to another maildir.
1)[EMAIL PROTECTED] looks in the joebloggs maildir on the mailserver
whilst checking mail ... correct?
2) Create an additional maildir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3)Create the maildir eg [EMAIL
J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some odd reason... one of my qmail machines is
"blind" to mail going to the same domain! smtpd just
places them in the que and qmailsend doesn't see
them until I kill/restart qmailsend. After I restart,
it sends them and then becomes stupid again and
doesn't
send
Sergei Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all mail to my domain my isp send to user "domain". every 600 sec
fetchmail flush received mail. but in local server the mail stored to
maildir owner "domain". normal, the mail must store to maildir owner
"anyuser"
fetchmail-5.4.5 are running:
fetchmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have the information step by step?
Yes, and it's even been translated to Spanish:
http://www.es.qmail.org/documentacion/usuarios/lwq/
I need install it on a Digital-Alpha with Tru64 4.0F ... The Qmail
will run very good?
Si.
The qmail no need the file
"Ihnen, David" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if I could specify more than one possible relay-to address,
in case an address is down. For instance:
test.com:mail1.test.com
test.com:mail2.test.com
test.com:mail3.test.com
Would relay only to mail3 if mail1 and 2 were down, mail 2
"Slider" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to create a small Sun Solaris 5.7 development server!
You've got your work cut out, then, because there's no such thing as
"Solaris 5.7". There's SunOS 5.7, and there's Solaris 7, but no
Solaris 5.7.
Yes, this is confusing...that's why I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 user A has enable auto reply and put some text
2 user B has also enabled auto reply and has put some auto reply text
3 now if user A will send any mail to user B then A will get an auto
reply from B ,again as user A has set his auto reply enabled
so A will sent
Kornyakov Yevgeny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several virtualdomians.
How I can to sort users whith identical names,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] must be as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] must be as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
may be via ~/alias/ ???
If you use control/virtualdomains, each virtual domain
Dave Kitabjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. Newbies: check out http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
Aargh. No XXL's. :-(
-Dave
Eric Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. The mailserver then contacts teh first server on teh list, says "here's
an e-mail message", along with a list of addresses (usually 20 or so).
Sometimes all those addresses are on that server, somtimes not.
4. To stop spam, the receiver then checks the
"David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interesting thing about this scheme, I think, is that servers that
supported it might not test as open to ORBS / RSS. Maybe that's why
somebody is trying to push the idea?
Perhaps, but, of course, if the idea catches on, spammers will catch
onto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, I've defined a user, Jim.Morley. When I send test
msgs to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", the Qmail Mailer-
Daemon returns "Sorry, no mailbox here by that name."
qmail doesn't deliver mail to users whose usernames contain uppercase
letters. See:
Eric Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still agree that it is a bizarre theory, but why does qmail deny the
delivery of mail from this server to the legit user on my system?
What evidence do you have that it does? I just did a quick test:
$ telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still no success however, but logs did shed a bit of light. Delivery
errors for my tests have changed from "no mailbox here by that
name" to "delvery deferred:_dot-forward:_command_not_found".
Is the "dot-forward" a package that I've failed to install, or is my
Say you're having a problem with qmail, and you want to request help
from some people who might be able to help, and--at the same time--you
want to annoy the hell out of them. Here are a few tips:
1) Post the message multiple times. To be even more annoying, change
the subject each time--or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any one who knows how to install qmail on AIX 4.3 , i have
installed it on RedHat 6.1,
but in case of AIX i dont know how to remove sendmail and creation of the
links /usr/sbin/sendmail, /usr/lib/sendmail etc
please help me ASAP , else i have to switch
Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, could anybody tell me if this is possible using qmail under RH 6.2
and secondly how to configure qmail mail to do this.
Dan's fastforward package will do this via /etc/aliases. See:
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/fastforward.html
-Dave
"Kevin Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I can't relay any email, the error I got when the email was returned
is.
and my ISDN dial IP address is 212.159.51.38, so it should go through.
mail returned
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at merlins.force9.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to
Michael Fiumano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having troubles receiving mail with qmail. Here is my setup: I am
running qmail on my linux box behind a NAT device. My MX record points to
a name not in my domain (dynamic dns) and that name points to my IP
address (that shouldn't matter much).
"UrBuN DeGeNeRaTe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently have Qmail 1.03 setup on an Intel based RedHat Linux 6.1
machine. It is working fine except for a problem which I keep on getting
when trying to check mail through a POP client .. I'm using qmail-pop3d as
my POP server, and this is the
"Tyler J. Frederick" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's trying to receive mail for fiumano.com, and he has that in his
locals already.
OK, I was just going by what he said:
... What seems to be happening is that
my server is looping the mail back to itself because it can't realize that
"Tyler J. Frederick" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*nod* Any other thoughts on his problem? Seems like if his domain is in
locals, then it should attempt local delivery and either A) bounce or
B) deliver, but it's trying to fwd it out. His smtproutes is empty also.
If I were him, I'd restart
"Tony Campisi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our qmail server has been up for 2 days and everything is working fine. I
would like to use qmailanalog to analyze activity.
I have read through the archive but need more answers.
I installed qmailanalog-0.70
qmailanalog requires timestamps in a
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think someone has recently subscribed an email harvester to the qmail list.
Nope. They're sending the spam directly to the list.
-Dave
"P.Y. Adi Prasaja" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is your previous post:
He apparently confused incoming concurrency with outgoing
concurrency.
What are you trying to say in this regard?
Motonori seems to have thought that the "smtp" service entry in
master.cf controlled outgoing
"Bernard (Brian) J. Duffy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a problem where several users are getting email that is being
sent to another person. One guys email in particular is being received by
four other people. This problem has now spread to several other individuals.
I checked
Martin Sckopke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we're using a little script to do some header rewriting.
Sorry, that voids your qmail warranty. :-)
It is called via .qmail-fixup-default.
The output of the script is the fed into qmail-inject,
QMAILINJECT=i.
Almost everything works as expected, there's
"John McCoy, Jr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know to stop them by putting this in [badmailfrom]
@friend.zzn.com
@yes.zzn.com
Can I do it this way?
@*.zzn.com
No, but you could block their IP addresses using tcpserver.
-Dave
"David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 4 August 2000 at 09:37:29 -0400
Eval 1 Eval 2 Eval 3
MTA timedns timedns timedns
qmail 155 1250 127 1230 127 1235
Jesús Arnáiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4)
Can anybody tell me something about this problem?.
It means just what it says: qmail couldn't
"P.Y. Adi Prasaja" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:14:32AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
He apparently confused incoming concurrency with outgoing
concurrency. Luckily, Postfix defaults to 50, so the results are still
valid.
Then you wrong either :-)
No, I'm
Kornyakov Yevgeny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use procmail, and if "| preline procmail" line is exist in the .qmail
file, I get two identical letters.
First letter from qmail delivery
Second letter from procmail delivery
I need use only procmail delivery.
If the only line in the .qmail file is
"Eddie Greer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for responding. The answer that I am trying to find is whether the
maildirmake command creates a file of any sort that keeps track of the
mailboxes.
No, maildirmake makes a maildir. That's all; nothing else.
We changed someone's mailbox,
What do
J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed the alias to:
.qmail-joe:bob
with the contents: bobj
I restarted all qmail daemons.. and unfortunatly I
still get the "no mailbox here by that name".
Any other sugguestions?
No, that ought to work--assuming bobj is a valid mail user. For
example:
Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eindex.html
I saw, at least at evaluation 3, postfix beat qmail ;)
Check again. qmail won all three tests. In Evaluation 3, qmail
finished in ~125 seconds, and Postfix took over 150 seconds--next to
last place.
So
"P.Y. Adi Prasaja" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this information could be gathered from:
http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eoperation.html
then one can make a conclusion that the authors no nothing about
postfix. /etc/postfix/master.cf has nothing todo with concurrency
control in
Fernando Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irwan Hadi wrote:
At 08:45 PM 8/1/00 -0300, you wrote:
Im setting a mailing list system that will require a VERY good
performance. After search for a lot of options, Ive decided to use qmail
because I think it is the most quick and
"Chris, the Young One" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 09:12:27AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
! ! This is the output of ls -dln...
! !
! ! drwxr-sr-x2 400 400 163 Jul 30 17:50 /var/qmail/alias/
!
! Looks good.
!
! Yes and no. That's the right uid but
Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02-Aug-2000, Dave Sill wrote:
I don't think it's quite as secure as qmail
Would you care to shed some light on why you don't think so?
Two reasons:
1) Postfix only uses a single uid. qmail uses six.
2) Wietse's code is buggier than Dan's. Check
J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the users have accounts on this qmail server, but
the account names are
different than their email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.. Job Bob's userid
on the unix machine is "bobj" /home/bobj
Under the alias directory I created a .qmail-joe-bob
(also tried
Fernando Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im wondering what can I change to improve the performance of my
mailing list, I already read the documentation and found a lot of thinks
like the number of paralell proccess and other things.
I really need a great performance in this mailing
Sten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill writes:
DS "message id" does the trick.
Not any better than 'message-id'. It finds what it should,
but also tosses in extraneous messages (like
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/03/msg00099.html
- 'id' do
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 06:04:12PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Use any version of PGP or "PGP for Windows" and use the clipboard encryption
features:
1) select all text (Ctrl-A)
2) "copy" (Ctrl-C)
3) click on PGP tray icon
4) click "sign encrypt"
Toens Bueker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From inetd(8):
The optional `max'' suffix (separated from `wait'' or `nowait'' by a dot)
specifies the maximum number of server instances that may be spawned from
inetd within an interval of 60 seconds. When omitted, `max'' defaults to 40.
That's a rate
Sten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see anything in the FAQ that seemed to be relevant to
this, and the ORNL search engine wants to split 'message-id' into
'message' and 'id'.
"message id" does the trick.
I just received a pair of messages from PayPal, which appears
to be
Patrick Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Each SMTP server could compute a random set of keys when it
is installed, and a simple new command could be added to retrieve
the public key. When any connection is made between the servers,
a public key would be fetched. If the remote server has not been
Blackey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"
The Bill means the UK government - specifically the Home Office and
Home Secretary Jack Straw - can demand encryption keys to any and all
data communications, with a prison sentence of two years for those who
do not comply with the order.
(source
Anders Kvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install a new qmail
How? From source? RPM?
Jul 28 15:21:21 tux qmail: 964790481.074367 delivery 18: deferral:
+Sorry,_message_has_wrong_owner._(#4.3.5)/
qmail expects messages in the queue to be owned by the qmailq user.
The set of qmail
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a one move handy way to restart qmail?
If you install "Life with qmail"'s "qmail" script--which uses DJB's
daemontools--restarting qmail is done by:
qmail restart
The complete set of commands is:
stop -- stops mail service (smtp connections
"Craig L. Ching" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've checked the log in
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current and I don't see any errors (I'm at work
and the log is at home, so I can't send the log, but it seems that smtpd is
fat and happy! I can get them and repost if someone thinks they're
of use),
"Craig L. Ching" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, will do. Can anyone post what the log should look like for a
successful receive by smtpd?
Sure:
964802107.045958 new msg 5878737
964802107.048026 info msg 5878737: bytes 640 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp
313391 uid 49491
964802107.175420 starting
"Craig L. Ching" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
k, thanks! If I remember correctly (I know, this is purely speculation!),
this is pretty much what my smtpd log looked like, only I'm looking in
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current. I didn't realize there were logs in
/service, so maybe I'll see
[Dan, please configure your mailer to wrap lines that are longer than
80 characters.]
"flitcraft33" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran the tai64local program against a copy of a log and got human
time stamps. I followed the steps on the matchup and got as far as a
file that had my log with a
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you install "Life with qmail"'s "qmail" script--which uses DJB's
daemontools--restarting qmail is done by:
qmail restart
OK, so much for the quessing game. I find no address to acquire t
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, starting to get somewhere here. Setting QMAILHOST has stopped my
outgoing messages from bouncing. That now works.
With /var/qmail/rc containing the stock procmail usage rc file:
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
Geir Ove =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ksnes?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My customers have paid for like 100 email accounts
and one postmaster account... how to i restrict him
from making more than 100 email accounts?...
this is on a virtual domain..
Run a cron job periodically that removes/disables any
Jochen E. Führing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I do forwarding to another host ? I have setup several
virtualdomains and now all the mail for the domain example.com should
be redirected to host.mydomain.com.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do since you mention
virtual domains,
Ruchir Chandra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have Virtual domains and locals running on my qmail server. For the
domains hosted in locals, any incoming mail to a wrongly spelled ID gets
bounced immediately to the sender.
Right.
In case of domains under virtualdomains file the incoming mail for
"Neil D. Roberts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a little problem with creating a double alias. The situation is
the following: I have a mail server running qmail, which holds normal
mail boxes for POP3 clients, it also holds virtual domains which get
forwarded to local mail boxes for POP3
Nicklas af Ekenstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My /var/qmail/controls/virtualdomain looks like this:
fett.org:nille-fett
nille.org:nille-nille
In ~nille/ I have the following files:
.qmail-fett-default
.qmail-nille-default
The both contain this line:
nille
I have also set rcpthosts locals so
... This migration will not only address
performace issues that have arisen due to the number of lists/members on Red
Hat lists, but also highly improve ease of use for list members.
They don't mention whether their performance issues were Smartlist or
qmail related. If they have evidence
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written a benchmark that iterates over message sizes from 1000 to
64000 bytes, and from 1 to 16 recipients, and times how long it takes to
send the same message to all the recipients using qmail-remote. It
calls qmail-remote once with all the
Thomas Duterme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've looked at VERPS and it looks pretty good for being able to handle
bounces and guaranteeing correct mail addresses, but this still doesn't
address the issue of automated bounce handlers. More to the point: I'm
trying to find out what rules these
"Michael T. Babcock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, is there a discussion in the past that I've missed about 'void
main' declarations? :-)
Yes. A quick search of the archives for "void main" yields:
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1996/12/msg01898.html
-Dave
"James Blondin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question I have is, and
excuse my ignorance if it's something silly: why not just accept the bare
linefeeds? From what I can understand in RFC822, there's nothing wrong
with bare linefeeds in the body of the messages as long as the headers
have all
"Bob Ross" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The questoin is I want to add the new domain righ now so that users will be
able to collect mail sent to either domain to make the transiction easier.
Do I just add the new domain in the same locations as the old domain under
the /var/qmail/control files? to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrique Vadillo) wrote:
I'm using qmail 1.03, i'd like to log every IP connection to my qmail
smtp server, i've noticed that tcpserver is not logging this info for now,
my tcpserver runs like follows:
tcpserver -R -c 100 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u 7170 -g 1100 0 smtp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'problem' as it relates to RFCs, not to Qmail's implementation,
is probably the original question.
Probably? If you don't know, why bother guessing? I answered the
question I thought was asked. If the person who asked the question
isn't satisfied with that answer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see how "If there is ever a compiler dumb enough to break
void main(), I will happily advise everyone to use a different
compiler" engenders any trust in someone's ability to write C code.
The proof of Dan's pudding is in the eating. Theoretically, "void
main"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) wrote:
Theoretically, BIND's noncompliance with standards is wrong. In
practice, it interoperates with most of the world (i.e., itself) just
fine. But I care.
I'll care about "void main" when it causes me problems. Until then,
I've got real problems to worry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are free to tell me where I was supposed to agree to a license
agreement before downloading it and/or where the LICENSE file is
and/or where the license is embedded in C source files ...
qmail is copyrighted by DJB. You have no rights to copy or use it
other than
"James Blondin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer you gave was useful, Dave, but although I didn't realize it at
first, my question is really relating to the RFCs more than to qmail's
implementation. It's just that qmail's implementation of it led me to
asking the question.
In that case,
"David Bouw" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything works nicely, but I would like to have all mail be delivered in
the the /var/spool/mail directory instead of $HOME/$USER/Mailbox..
I read the INSTALL files, but I can't figure out something..
You run the command 'qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, in a case-law country, I can do pretty much whatever I think
is legal to do until he sues me. At that point, the courts decide.
Most importantly, will he allow full-modification and redistribution
with a new name (GPL style). IE, forking.
It's clear from
"James Blondin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill wrote:
In that case, qmail is not strictly RFC822 compliant in rejecting
messages with bare linefeeds. Apparently Dan felt that the effort
necessary to allow messages to contain LF's was more trouble than it
was worth--especially
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) wrote:
Well, qmail-local can deliver to maildirs or mboxes anywhere, but
there's no way to describe a maildir or mbox in a user-dependent way
except by using a path relative to the user's home directory. So
/var/spool/mail/user can be used in users' .qmail files,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to force qmail to queue mail rather than
bouncing it?
No need. It does that automatically.
i.e., qmail is set to relay all mail to a different mail server.
But then the mail server process on the second machine goes down, so
the
Lars Brandi Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to telnet to port 25 ( telnet 10.1.x.x 25 ) locally and it
works fine. I have send and recived mails locally and it works out fine.
I have send mails outside my net and it works fine. But to recieve mails
from outside isn't working. I have
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to start a mailer holy war,
Uh oh.
but you might want to try Mutt -- it's
MIME support is excellent, along with pgp/gpg support, and total
configurability. Try www.mutt.org.
Mutt is a fine mailer. Really. I use it at home and occasionally at
work,
"Julian Brown" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here's my configuration. If anyone can tell me why I have slow mail
delivery, I checked the Trigger permissions and they are supposedly fine.
Any insight would be so greatly appreciated.
Pentium III 550
256 Megs of Ram
FreeBSD 3.3
Rackspace.Com
"Julian Brown" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok so you guys want me to attach my log or something? If you're sure that's
what you need I would be more than happy. Let me know I'll send it to your
private boxes.
No, I don't want a copy of your entire mail log. If you can't post the
last 30 lines or
Mark Mentovai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail-send's behavior for remote deliveries (which includes how it deals
with qmail-rspawn and qmail-remote) is something that's bothered me for a
while. The system really should manage remote deliveries better. At
present, we have one SMTP connection per
"Michael T. Babcock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Petr Novotny wrote:
This horse has been beaten to death. What do you mean by
"should"? And why "limited number"?
To be friendly to your neighbours ...
Ah... And are your HTTP, FTP, etc. clients and servers also "friendly
to your neighbours"? Or
"Frank Tegtmeyer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If VERPs are used you have different senders.
Different *envelope* senders, yes: that's how VERP works. But the
originator is one entity (a user or a mail list handler).
So bundling receivers of
the same message at one host is a non issue at all (at
Mark Mentovai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not? You can have your cake and eat it too. Efficient network
utilization doesn't mean delayed or slow delivery.
Say you have 100 different messages to deliver to various users at
AOL. Which will be faster:
1) Opening one connection to a single AOL
Mark Mentovai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use "should" in the same manner that it is used in the documents which
define the very standards and practices over which we are arguing. In order
to be a good 'net neighbor, an MTA (note that I am not singling any MTA out
here) should not open 25 SMTP
"Michael T. Babcock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft ended up with good software at some point in time ... best of its
class even ... then stopped making it better.
For a second there I thought you were serious. Ha, ha. Good one.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I have been digging and digging, but to no avail as of yet. How
can I force qmail to arbitrarily queue /all/ outgoing mail and
deliver nothing until I "flip the switch" back, so to speak.
To stop delivery, set concurrencyremote and concurrencylocal to 0,
restart
Kimberly Vher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i set up a virtual domain then got this error
ul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.040630 delivery 50: failure:
This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)/
Jul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.041007 status: local 0/10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cut--
Hi. This is the maildirbounce program at terramenta.de.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
195.20.224.204 said: 503 Valid RCPT TO recipient must precede DATA
---
Robert Spraggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking( I know a dangerous concept :-) ) would putting the
following in the tcp.smtp.cbd file be as effective:
127.0.0.1:allow
199.175.103.1:allow --- the IP of the mail host ---
That would make sure that only local messages would be
"Devinder" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added | preline procmail in my ~user/.qmail file
When the the new mail arrives procmail is spawned and the mail is processed
and sento the appropriate folder
However everyone who has logged into the machine get a warning..
***
ourserv
Thomas Haberland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sample:
mail.one.com(users A, B, C)
mail.two.com(users D, E, F)
mail.three.de (users G, H and A, D)
Of course a mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is not allowed, and so on. Any mail domai
has it own user base.
Qmail is
"Hitesh Thakkar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I have IBM's WEBSPHERE with EJB and servelts in JAVA applets developed in
JDK 1.1.6. I can use JAVA MAIL API to write mail message for specific users
as per the logic in java scripts. I am stuck with how can invoke QMAIL so
that, it delivers a load of
601 - 700 of 1816 matches
Mail list logo
