Hi to all,
I am going to implement a mail server based on qmailtoaster. I saw that
qmailtoaster comes with a mysql-based installation. As I need an authentication
method qmail-based, do you think it is easily switchable teh authentication
from mysql to ldap?
Thanks for your answers.
Stefano.
Dear all,,
Can somebody post me tips to stop Image SPAM.
You must use the ocr plugin for spamassassin .
Basically the mail will be converted in ascii from this plugin and
spamassassin will do its job
in the same way .
Some tips at: http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/OCRmain
have
ashok wrote:
Dear all,,
Can somebody post me tips to stop Image SPAM.
The SARE_STOCK ruleset does a decent job of catching the GIF pill ads.
Other than that, there's not really an easy way.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Stefano Scalise wrote:
Hi to all,
I am going to implement a mail server based on qmailtoaster. I saw
that qmailtoaster comes with a mysql-based installation. As I need an
authentication method qmail-based, do you think it is easily
switchable teh authentication from mysql to ldap?
Thanks
Hello. I use qmailadmin to handle my accounts of mail, but necesitaria to
know if the accounts by commentaries and not by name of accounts can be
looked for, be ordered Gracias
web actual
accountReal Name
ariel pepe-pepe
arielb jaun-juan
quiero esto
arielbjuan-juan
Hi People
AM trying to build a new toaster here but the packages are coming down very
very slow??? Anything the matter with the qmailtoaster.com site??
my distro Fedora 5
ALex
I need some help trying to troubleshoot a very serious problem that
has cropped up. The last two days, the amount of email coming through
to my user accounts on my server has dropped dramatically. I have not
changed a single setting on the server. Accounts that were previously
receiving on
Nothing is wrong with http://www.qmailtoaster.com/
However, going to the site without qmailtoaster.com is an issue.
Erik
On 1/10/07, Kisakye Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi People
AM trying to build a new toaster here but the packages are coming down very
very slow??? Anything the matter
I meant going to the site without the www (ie
http://qmailtoaster.com/) will bring up a password prompt.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing is wrong with http://www.qmailtoaster.com/
However, going to the site without qmailtoaster.com is an issue.
Erik
On 1/10/07,
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Nothing is wrong with http://www.qmailtoaster.com/
However, going to the site without qmailtoaster.com is an issue.
Leaving out the www. part will make it fail as well.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I have my new toaster up and running and have restored my email and users
with Jake's backup and restore scripts. I commented out the djbdns and
spamassassin parts of the scripts as I don't use djbdns and the
spamassassin parts seemed to cause error messages on previous attempts.
I now have my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have my new toaster up and running and have restored my email and users
with Jake's backup and restore scripts. I commented out the djbdns and
spamassassin parts of the scripts as I don't use djbdns and the
spamassassin parts seemed to cause error messages on previous
Thanks Jake,
I looked up the section in the faq but I'm not sure what is meant by 'Then
install the enw packages as normal.' Is it possible to advise me how to
install the new packages?
Many thanks in advance,
Kind regards,
Mark.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have my new toaster up and
These files are now on the main site.
Erik
On 1/10/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have my new toaster up and running and have restored my email and users
with Jake's backup and restore scripts. I commented out the djbdns and
spamassassin parts of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jake,
I looked up the section in the faq but I'm not sure what is meant by 'Then
install the enw packages as normal.' Is it possible to advise me how to
install the new packages?
That's for if you're doing a new install. Just reinstall those 2
packages with
I am assuming it is possible to set up a list of addresses from whom
email should never be rejected as SPAM, regardless of what the
blacklists and Spamassassin say otherwise. But I cannot seem to find
in the documentation where such a list does or should reside, or what
format it should be in.
Oops!
Don't'cha love it when programs find their own bugs? ;)
That's indeed a bug. I'll get right on it.
Sérgio Costa wrote:
Hi,
theres a problem on new qtp-newmodel when select development packages
Do you want to select libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.4.1.src.rpm from
Development?
Shall we
Bug is fixed in new release 0.2.5-1.3.7
Thanks Sérgio.
P.S. This subject should have read 0.2.4-1.3.6!
Eric Shubes wrote:
Oops!
Don't'cha love it when programs find their own bugs? ;)
That's indeed a bug. I'll get right on it.
Sérgio Costa wrote:
Hi,
theres a problem on new
Nice Job ES
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug is fixed in new release 0.2.5-1.3.7
Thanks Sérgio.
P.S. This subject should have read 0.2.4-1.3.6!
Eric Shubes wrote:
Oops!
Don't'cha love it when programs find their own bugs? ;)
That's indeed a bug. I'll get right on it.
Hello there!
I have a customer that has two sendmail servers and what they have been
doing is adding domains and e-mail addresses to
/etc/mail/local-mail-hosts and /etc/mail/virtusertable by hand, and
creating the exact same UNIX logins on both Linux servers. Then, for
all of the domains set up
Server works fine, but too many spam pass true.
This is heder of SPAM mail and score is very low (1.7), can some give
advice how to raise scoring?
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 15558 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan
David Milholen wrote:
So, should I upgrade my whole package? or just the qmail part?
That depends on how critical the server is. The development packages are
generally very stable, but there is still a (slightly) higher risk of
running into a problem with them than with the stable ones. If
Igor Vukotić wrote:
Server works fine, but too many spam pass true.
This is heder of SPAM mail and score is very low (1.7), can some give
advice how to raise scoring?
Add some additional rules from rulesemporium.com, enable URIBL from the
wiki, train your Bayes (some info also on the wiki),
Jake you killing me :)
I will tray from step 1
Tnx
On 2007.01.10, at 20:07, Jake Vickers wrote:
Igor Vukotić wrote:
Server works fine, but too many spam pass true.
This is heder of SPAM mail and score is very low (1.7), can some
give advice how to raise scoring?
Add some additional rules
In general, the development and serious testing happens on multiple
distros (centos4, fc6, and soon opensuse) on a machine running OpenVZ
provided by Lightspeed Wireless (they've really helped the development
of this project).
By the time it's on the devel site, the packages have undergone some
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
I need some help trying to troubleshoot a very serious problem that has
cropped up. The last two days, the amount of email coming through to my
user accounts on my server has dropped dramatically. I have not changed
a single setting on the server. Accounts that were
Igor Vukotić wrote:
Jake you killing me :)
I will tray from step 1
Tnx
On 2007.01.10, at 20:07, Jake Vickers wrote:
Igor Vukotić wrote:
Server works fine, but too many spam pass true.
This is heder of SPAM mail and score is very low (1.7), can some
give advice how to raise scoring?
Add
This should handle spam checking ok, but blacklists would still apply. To
bypass rbl checking for a domain (by IP address), add an entry in
/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp with RBLSMTPD=. See
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/RBLs at the bottom of the page.
Don't forget to
# qmailctl cdb
to activate
Note, you can use qtp-newmodel (which doesn't require updating for new
packages) instead of the install scripts. ;)
Erik Espinoza wrote:
In general, the development and serious testing happens on multiple
distros (centos4, fc6, and soon opensuse) on a machine running OpenVZ
provided by
Thanks for the pointer, George. Nice thing to know!
To be more specific, is that the last one listed by ifconfig? (and what
determines that?)
George Sweetnam wrote:
One thing to keep in mind when adding multiple ip's on a machine... the smtp
services will use the LAST ip listed on the box.
Thanks Jake,
I ran the re-installs but spamassassin does not seem to be working. I
have copied the header below of a spam from my inbox that seems to show no
spamassassin activity.
Can you point me to a source of information that will take me through
getting it going?
Kind regards,
Mark.
Great, i add only 2 additional rules from rulesemp. and enable URIBL
and scoring is great !!
Tnx again Jake..
On 2007.01.10, at 20:32, Jake Vickers wrote:
Igor Vukotić wrote:
Jake you killing me :)
I will tray from step 1
Tnx
On 2007.01.10, at 20:07, Jake Vickers wrote:
Igor Vukotić
Hello
sorry if I missed the answer (couldnt find it on the mail archive)
What does this option do again in the tcp.smtp file
NOP0FCHECK=1
Thx for the answer
-Philip
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Well, let's see.
1) qmlog doesn't work on my system. I'm going to go out on a limb and
assume that to be because I don't have the latest Toaster installed. I
installed back in early June, and have not updated. I've had other
projects on my plate and in my way, and I've been terrified to bring
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Well, let's see.
1) qmlog doesn't work on my system. I'm going to go out on a limb and
assume that to be because I don't have the latest Toaster installed. I
installed back in early June, and have not updated. I've had other
projects on my plate and in my way, and
Is SA turned on in the /var/qmail/control/simscan file?
What does your /var/log/qmail/spamd/current file show?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jake,
I ran the re-installs but spamassassin does not seem to be working. I
have copied the header below of a spam from my inbox that seems to show
Y'all may have heard already (or even noticed directly, as I have) that
Spamhaus' PBL list has now become active as part of the zen.spamhous.org list.
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/
PUBLIC BETA NOW LIVE
Sat Jan 6 2007
17:30 UTC
Spamhaus is now serving PBL data in the DNSBL zone:
Hi all,
My company wants to prevent people from deleting email via POP3.
The problem is that by default, outlook express will delete all emails
after it downloaded them. This is something that we have no control over,
nor can we force the users to switch to another email client.
So do you know
There is no way to do this without hiring a team of coders to re-write
the pop3 server for you to ignore deletes, yet not show duplicates
once they've been downloaded. Otherwise the client will keep
downloading the same messages as new.
Either that, or get people to change their default
Dairenn Lombard wrote:
Sure, rather easy. Setup the 10 MX machine so that it has the
domain in
it's /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file and it will accept
email for that
domain, then send it off to the 20 MX machine. Putting in the
smtproute
will speed this up and stop DNS lookups. That's it.
Trung Pham wrote:
Hi all,
My company wants to prevent people from deleting email via POP3.
The problem is that by default, outlook express will delete all emails
after it downloaded them. This is something that we have no control over,
nor can we force the users to switch to another email
Quinn Comendant wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:58:33 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote:
So, how is testing of the mail submission port 487 addition to
qmail-toatser going? ;P
I meant port 587.
And qmail-toadster.
I'm not sure if Erik's moved the submission port into the main trunk
yet,
Trung Pham wrote:
Our goal is to retain all the emails that were ever received for record
tracking. And we can not afford to leave it up to the users to disable
this option since not all users will play nice and follow instruction.
That would definitely be taps. You can set it to send a copy
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 13:02 -0800, Trung Pham wrote:
Hi all,
My company wants to prevent people from deleting email via POP3.
I assume this is for archival (fascist government regulation) purposes?
If so the easiest way I know of is when you setup a mailbox you also set
a user.archive
Hehe, no NFS for me, thanks.
Actually, I take back what I said; I don't want to have whatever does
the SMTP AUTH on MX 10 query MX 20's database, because if MX 20 goes
down, MX 10 becomes brainless.
So, actually my original plan/idea seems best: Write two scripts:
/usr/local/sbin/vpmdump.sh
I'd wait for Alexey's OK before trying out DomainKeys. He's written some
patches for it, and has been knows it as well as anybody. I think that the
fixes are all in the current devel version, but you might want to wait for
some success stories from the stable branch before trying to deploy it.
Jake,
I don't have a simscan file at all in that location.
Here is an extract from the ...current file
@400045a406451146d80c [2919] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK'
@400045a4064511481474 [2919] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE
has
Thanks all.
I will use Taps for this purpose.
Vince Callaway wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 13:02 -0800, Trung Pham wrote:
Hi all,
My company wants to prevent people from deleting email via POP3.
I assume this is for archival (fascist government regulation) purposes?
If so the easiest way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake,
I don't have a simscan file at all in that location.
Sorry, that's /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
That's probably ok though, given that SA appears to be scanning based on the
log messages.
Here is an extract from the ...current file
@400045a406451146d80c
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
weeks time.
Thanks,
Erik
Sounds encouraging. There isn't a file named simcontrol either...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake,
I don't have a simscan file at all in that location.
Sorry, that's /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
That's probably ok though, given that SA appears to be scanning based on
the
log messages.
Thanks for the advice, Eric. I'll wait to do the upgrade until the
DomainKeys is ready to deploy. Once I can upgrade, I can hammer on
SpamAssassin a bit more to get it to learn the SPAM that is coming in
and dump it into SPAM folders, which will mean we don't lose it, we
just don't have to
What version of the toaster are you running?
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds encouraging. There isn't a file named simcontrol either...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake,
I don't have a simscan file at all in that location.
Sorry, that's /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
Since you've installed qmailtoaster-plus, you can do
# qtp-set-rbls -default
and it will restore the (toaster) default rbl, which is sbl.spamhaus.org.
(You can also run it from qtp-menu if you like).
That should be safe if I understand things correctly, and still cut down on
spam quite a bit.
Or,
I've attached a text file with the result and also the directory listing.
Kind regards,
Mark.
What version of the toaster are you running?
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds encouraging. There isn't a file named simcontrol either...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake,
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
type sa-update
And then spamassassin -D --lint and check the output for things
missing.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached a text file with the result and also the directory listing.
Kind regards,
Mark.
You should have this (the stock default):
# cat /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.exe:.src:.bat:.pif
# ls -l
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by
default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its
Is there a link to download an earlier verious module?
I lost my copy of qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.9.src.rpm
Regards
Jakin Lee
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Yes.
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No.
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant safe*
On
Hi Jakin,
The only difference between qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.9.src.rpm and the
current release on the main site is that you can enable an extra
patch, namely srs. By merely not enabling the patch with --define
'srs 1', you are building the same package as you would have if you
started with
However, if you use qtp-newmodel with qtp-build-rpms v0.2.3
(qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.3-1.3.5 or later), the --define 'spambox 1'
parameter will be used unconditionally for qmailadmin-toaster, so you should
be sure to upgrade to the latest maildrop-toaster if you upgrade
qmailadmin-toaster using
Greetings, qmailtech.
7 ?? 2007 ?., 5:29:19 you have wrote:
I'm trying my first install of QMT on CentOS 4.4. I've installed
minimal
for OS Install and am following the CentOS install procedure. I'm
running
each command in the scripts line by line to insure all is well, and when
I
Greetings, qmailtech.
7 ?? 2007 ?., 5:29:19 you have wrote:
I'm trying my first install of QMT on CentOS 4.4. I've installed
minimal
for OS Install and am following the CentOS install procedure. I'm
running
each command in the scripts line by line to insure all is well, and when
I
70 matches
Mail list logo
