On my RHEL 4 system, it comes with the MAIL variable set in /etc/profile:
MAIL=/var/spool/mail/$USER
What should this be set to for the qmail toaster?
MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ ?
Q
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
It's not necessary, but it's a pretty darned good idea.
Are you running any periodical (cron) sync or expire options with sa-learn?
Training mechanisms? I'm venturing to setup a setup within Horde/IMP so users
can flag spam/ham message to help train the database. But I'm still a bit short
in
Are you running any periodical (cron) sync or expire options with sa-learn?
Training mechanisms? I'm venturing to setup a setup within Horde/IMP so
users can flag spam/ham message to help train the database. But I'm still a
bit short in the know-how of executing scripts via valias (see my related
I was testing this again this morning, as it was some time ago that I did
this, and it seems it's not just the -H it's a combination of the -l0 and
-H.
They do the following I believe. (based on tcpserver paramaters.)
-H: Do not look up the remote host name in DNS; remove the environment
Hi Erik
Thanks =, this is exactly what I was thinking, but is there a way to know
for sure that it wll lcik down any emails that only coem fromt his
specific server?
If not that's ok, just curious...
Nozy
Ah, 4 domains and two will be in mailguard. Got itI missed
something when I
slamp slamp wrote:
did you try Craig Smith's solution for the same issue he was having?
If removing the DNS check from the pop run file fixes the issue, then
that should also answer your question of where the problem is.
I'd say this is a band-aid, not a fix.
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm trying to create an alias that pipes a message to sa-learn. I've created
the alias:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1 ~]$valias -s strangecode.com | grep spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - |sa-learn --ham --no-sync
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - |sa-learn --spam --no-sync
That didn't work, so I
Hello shubes,
just wanted to let you know the following message I am now geting during
upgrade. In my my previous upgrade I answered yes when prompted to remove
the sandbox.
/opt/qtp-sandbox exists, and is apparently not a sandbox
Please use a different value for SANDBOX and try again
I did try the fix with the run file and it didn't work for me. But I
did get it fixed. Once I got bind working for localhost, 127, and
x.1.168.192 and with forwarders to my ISP dns servers it is working
fine. I just don't understand why I had to have this. I had a previous
qmailtoaster
Jeremy Runner wrote:
I did try the fix with the run file and it didn't work for me. But I
did get it fixed. Once I got bind working for localhost, 127, and
x.1.168.192 and with forwarders to my ISP dns servers it is working
fine. I just don't understand why I had to have this. I had a
Cordial Saludo, lista quiciera saber si alguien me
puede explicar o darme un enlace donde puedan haber ejemplos de los archivos .qmail
por ej, si necesito hacer que los mails pasen por determinados filtros, que
variables puedo utilizar, a donde van los amils después de pasar por un filtro
Busca en el manual de dot-qmail
Ya sabes:
man dot-qmail
Así
mismo, te recomiendo estas utilidades http://www.superscript.com/qtools/intro.html
Ah, por favor, escribe en ingles en la lista, o al menos incluye la
traduccion, o indica en el subject que hablas en castellano,
gracias.
ENG
On Tue, November 7, 2006 2:45 am, David Sánchez Martín wrote:
Maybe this is usefull for somebody.
I've a cronjob like this
that was *very* useful. i am a noob, yet i was able to follow your post
and implement squirrel spam training for my toaster...after installing
spam_buttons and
Can someone help me figure out how to not send the bounce messages back
to the sender which are being returned by spamassasin?
I am having issues with my server bombarding unsuspecting people whose
email was hijacked with spam bounces.
Thanks
set up account to catchall deleted
It is under qmailadmin.
Alex wrote:
Can someone help me figure out how to not send the bounce messages back
to the sender which are being returned by spamassasin?
I am having issues with my server bombarding unsuspecting people whose
email was hijacked
Thank you. I already have that set and that only deletes the incoming
wrong user mail, not the email sent out as bounces.
-Original Message-
From: abdul khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:35 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re:
Returned by spamassassin???
Ok, let's figure it out the problem:
The problem is one spammer sends you a forged From mail.
1.- If the mail From is not valid, is rejected by chkuser, no bounces
2.- If the mail Recipient is not a valid user on your mailserver is rejected
by chkuser, so no
I disabled the baysian filter and autolearn to see if that would help.
I also checked the smtp logs again, and I'm still seeing entries like this:
2006-11-07 11:57:13.124734500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote dom1:unknown:83.6.253.146
rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found
On Nov 7, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Joshua Zukerman wrote:
None of those accounts exist, yet it says found existing recipient ?
I don't understand that part.
do you have a catchall account defined? look in qmailadmin to find out.
you may want to configure your domains to drop (not bounce) messages
I meant to say in my original e-mail that the catchall was set to
delete. I set that up again just to be sure.
Josh
On 11/7/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Joshua Zukerman wrote:
None of those accounts exist, yet it says found existing recipient ?
I
Thank you. You cleared it up for me.
-Original Message-
From: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:25 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces
Returned by spamassassin???
Quinn Comendant wrote:
It's not necessary, but it's a pretty darned good idea.
Are you running any periodical (cron) sync or expire options with sa-learn?
Not yet. I've been leaving that out in hopes of pinpointing what the problem
really is. I wait for it to break, run something, and wait
hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce.
bounce message:
rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your
email is considered spam (17.50 spam-hits) (in reply to end of DATA
command))
smtp log:
2006-10-24 16:56:47.566033500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello shubes,
just wanted to let you know the following message I am now geting during
upgrade. In my my previous upgrade I answered yes when prompted to remove
the sandbox.
/opt/qtp-sandbox exists, and is apparently not a sandbox
Please use a different value for
Following up on this. Can this be enabled by
Drop Message option
(http://qmailwiki.inter7.com/Simscan/Guide#Drop_Message_option)
Some sites have security policies in place which require them to
accept every email. For these sites there is an option to do all the
normal simscan processing, but
Gracias
Ok thanks
De: David Sánchez
Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Martes, 07 de
Noviembre de 2006 08:54 a.m.
Para:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster]
.qmail-default
Busca en el manual de dot-qmail
Ya sabes:
man dot-qmail
--enable-dropmsg accepts the e-mail and silently drops the message. We
generate error 500's which sends a message to spammers to hit someone
else. It also makes legitimate senders generate bounces to their
sender.
This would be a bad thing, and is not necessary for the QmailToaster operation.
Is qtools something that people use very much? Should we include it in a
future release of qmailtoaster-plus?
If so, please go to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QTP_Wish_List and
state your case. ;)
David Sánchez Martín wrote:
Busca en el manual de dot-qmail
Ya sabes:
man
hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce.
bounce message:
rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your
email is considered spam (17.50 spam-hits) (in reply to end of DATA
command))
You are generating a REJECT NOT A BOUNCE
IMHO the bounce is
I do not use it at this moment, but it can be a good idea. :-)
It lets you easy scripting with dot-qmail files, but it can be more
powerful if supported by qmailadmin or something.
Qmailadmin (at least older versions) tend to mesh with .qmail and undoing
what i've done via CLI.
Is qtools
mail.rollernet.us is my secondary mx (its for free). unfortunately
they don't like receiving bounce or reject messages coming from my
primary mx so they disable my account automatically (they call this
backscatter). this is something i dont want because i dont have a
backup if my network goes
Ok, understood.
You are using a backup MX that doesn't filter any spam.
You can enabl RELAY for that host 208.11.75.2 in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
Something like adding a line like this:
I was exploring this yesterday. I found the latest version of QmailAdmin does
add/change/delete user's .qmail files.
But I found a solution! Example for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
QmailAdmin will modify the following .qmail file (so if you edit this file vi
CLI expect your changes to be
I was exploring this yesterday. I found the latest version of QmailAdmin
does add/change/delete user's .qmail files.
But I found a solution! Example for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
QmailAdmin will modify the following .qmail file (so if you edit this file
vi CLI expect your changes to be
I've heard that it's not uncommon for spammers to use a secondary (or lowest
priority) MX server listed on DNS because the backup servers often don't
scan for spam. Sneaky little devils. ;)
It appears that what you need to able to do is to tailor the way spam is
handled according to the IP
It's true. It is a better idea to deliver to a mailbox so you can save the
messages if you ever need to retrain SA.
I found my original problem now... /root/bin directory was not searchable by
user vpopmail (chmod 700) so qmail-local could not execute the program.
Thanks!
Quinn
On Tue, 07
List,
I need to send a mail of information to all the mailboxes of the qmail
There is form to make it automatic, that is a mail and that is talked
back to all, without concerning the dominion that is?Gracias*Lista , necesito enviar un correo de informacion a todos los
Try the Email Users-0.5 button on the http://yourdomain.com/admin-toaster/
screen. I don't know which domain(s) it will be sent to. I'm guessing all,
since there's no place to specify.
Ariel wrote:
List, I need to send a mail of information to all the mailboxes of the
qmail There is form to
Uhm, that doesn't work. It's why the scripts don't install
sends-email-toaster package.
Erik
On 11/7/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try the Email Users-0.5 button on the http://yourdomain.com/admin-toaster/
screen. I don't know which domain(s) it will be sent to. I'm guessing all,
Just out of curiosity, what is it that would be in a /root/bin directory?
That's not a typical directory, is it?
Quinn Comendant wrote:
It's true. It is a better idea to deliver to a mailbox so you can save the
messages if you ever need to retrain SA.
I found my original problem now...
Oh. The newmodel script installs send-mails-toaster. Should it not?
Any idea what's broken? Perhaps someone would like to fix it?
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Uhm, that doesn't work. It's why the scripts don't install
sends-email-toaster package.
Erik
On 11/7/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List, I need to send a mail of information to all the mailboxes of the
qmail
There is form to make it automatic,
that is a mail and that is talked back to all, without concerning the
dominion that is?
Gracias
*
Suelo hacerme un script para esto, pero me parece
Not a typical directory. I have a habit of creating a directory structure for
each of my unix user accounts that does mirror typical unix directory
structures. In /root/bin I put all the admin scripts that I create that are
used by all administrators of the server.
Also, on my Mac laptop, I
Hey Jake,
Just saw on the list that you were upgrading the backup scripts. I use
these things all the time and they work pretty well. Just wanted to say
thanks.
Thanks
Q
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hey Jake,
Just saw on the list that you were upgrading the backup scripts. I use
these things all the time and they work pretty well. Just wanted to say
thanks.
No problem at all. Should have a new release out in the next couple days
that backs up just about
Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hey Jake,
Just saw on the list that you were upgrading the backup scripts. I use
these things all the time and they work pretty well. Just wanted to say
thanks.
Thanks
Q
Yes, but how well does the *restore* work?
The proof of the pudding is in the eating! :)
Well that is the Great thing about QMail toaster
Never needed to use it. LOL
I just knocked on wood!!
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 18:15 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hey Jake,
Just saw on the list that you were upgrading the backup scripts. I use
these things all
Dear all,
Recently, some of my users, all of them are roaming users,complaint that they can't send email through our qmail server. The bounce back message is similar to this:
Subject: RE: Sent: 11/7/2006 11:44 PMThe following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
' on
Greetings,
I've written a script that I think many may find useful.
It basically deletes mail in the .Trash folder that is older than 28
days. It also sa-learns and deletes from the .Spam folder on mails
older than 28 days.
It is available from here:
Actually I think I was wrong on this. For sa-learn, -C is for the *distributed*
config files (i.e. /usr/share/spamassassin)...
-C path, --configpath=path, --config-file=path
Use the specified path for locating the distributed configuration
files. Ignore the default
So is it better to recompile simscan with -drop-message option to not
have bounces sent to the sender and silently discard them?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:12 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re:
Bounces aren't being sent. The rollernet servers are the ones
generating the bounces, based on your error 500 rejection.
Sounds like in your case the best thing to do would be to enable
drop-message, or just exempt them by putting their servers in
tcp.smtp.
Erik
On 11/7/06, Alex [EMAIL
I am having a bizarre issue. I have per domain/user scanning enabled on
simscan and crafty spammers are faking headers in such a way that
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
deliver-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In simcontrol I have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:clam=yes,spam=yes
mydomain.com:clam=no,spam=no
the simscan does
I did not manually do anything on /opt/sandbox, however boot/ is not there
as you can see,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qtp-sandbox]# ls -hal /opt/qtp-sandbox/
total 68K
drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4.0K Nov 7 14:20 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Nov 1 09:02 ..
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4.0K Nov 1 09:02 backup
Is there an easy way to disable CHKUSER_RCPT_MX or do I need to recompile
chkuser?
It seems this one should be disabled by default. It is pretty annoying to be
sending an email to a couple dozen people and not be able to send because one
domain is wrong -- then having to go over the list
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Is there an easy way to disable CHKUSER_RCPT_MX or do I need to recompile
chkuser?
It seems this one should be disabled by default. It is pretty annoying to be
sending an email to a couple dozen people and not be able to send because one
domain is wrong -- then having
You have to rebuild qmail. See the procedure provided by Nick Hemmesch:
Nick Hemmesch wrote:
The easy way: rpm -Uvh qmail-toaster*.src.rpm cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS (assuming you are using CentOS 4) edit qmail-toaster.spec find 'sleep 5' (should be line 606)
change 5 to 300 (5 seconds to
Ok, that was easy enough. Actually instead of modifying the sleep length, I
found it more convenient to just stop the rpmbuild job (control z) and edit
chkuser_settings.h, the restart the rpmbuild job (fg return).
Regarding disabling CHKUSER_RCPT_MX. And regrets to doing so? Works great for
I don't have much concern about it. Especially when some of the senders / recipients use a not-that-standard email ID, such as having '' or '/' characters in the email ID, you have to disable that rules anyway.
Best regards,Bill
On 11/8/06, Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that was
59 matches
Mail list logo
