From: juergen perlinger
[]
If running NTP, Windows Time Service should be disabled anyway.
!!! s/should/MUST/ !!!
1.) two services competing for port 123/UDP is a bad idea.
2.) Two services trying to adjust the clock is an even worse idea!
=
Yes, indeed! This was
Hi, Yes The issue goes away if I disable the execution of ntpq.exe, Please
check the link I have shared in my earlier comment. I'm tracking the problem
down and so far I have found that the issue doesn't occur if you have the
windows time service disabled.
===
If
Thanks for your report.
On a newly installed PC running Windows-10 Pro, using standard NTP I see a
loss of "Available" memory of about 16 kB per ntpq invocation.
Numbers: running ntpq in a Perl script. This Perl script is called (with
different parameters) four times for each node. I'm
-Original Message-
From: Sadique Urf Arbaz Sayyed
We started with a brand new windows server 2019 datacenter edition and
installed an infrastructure monitoring agent on it and strictly no other
program. The machine had 8 GB of memory. As part of monitoring NTP offset
from sync'd host we
Hello,
I wonder what's a realistic ballpark for the jitter I can expect when
feeding a GPS PPS into ntpd?
[]
Thanks, regards
Andreas
===
Andreas,
I have some offset plots here:
https://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/performance_ntp.php
and a few experimental clock
Why? Repetition? Is PST time also annoying?
Universal Time Coordinate time is not really repetitious anyway, since
the noun is Coordinate. And UTC time means the type of time defined by
UTC-- since there are lots of other types of time one could use--
including decimal time ( 100 sec/min/
Hi Team,
I am new to NTP .
I want to estimate my machines configurtion that can be good enough to run
NTP server and give time to the network nodes.
1.Is NTP package comes with Ubuntu 14 version
or I only need to install it from internet.
2. Basically I do not have internet connction on my
From: Dan Drown
The system's time (kernel "clocksource") on the RPI is actually not
running at the same speed as the CPU clock.
From dmesg: arch_timer: cp15 timer(s) running at 19.20MHz (phys).
This gives you around 52ns of resolution. I believe it's the same on
all the rpi models.
I
There is a Garmin GPS 18x High-Sensitivity LVC Sensor 010-00321-36 for sale
on eBay here:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Garmin-GPS-18x-High-Sensitivity-LVC-Sensor-010-00321
-36-/77215324?hash=item33c0c1245c:g:L-gAAOSwOyJX-6Dn=mtr for only
$45.86 USD, $59.99 C in Canada. I bought one from eBay for
It is there:
http://www.npl.co.uk/science-technology/time-frequency/products-and-services/time/msf-outages
Greetings,
=
.. and about time, too!
Thanks,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web:
Op 15 apr. 2014, om 08:32 heeft David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid het volgende geschreven:
On 15/04/2014 07:24, William Unruh wrote:
[]
No, I meant that Windows at least did (pre Win7?) use local time as
system time.
And I seem to recall that even now it can use localtime as
From: Charles Swiger
Yes, you need to add --with-yielding_select=yes.
(Or no, depending on what select() does on the target platform.)
./configure normally runs a set of tests to figure all of this stuff out,
but those tests
need to run on the target and not on the build platform when
From: Charles Elliott
Cc: questions@lists.ntp.org
The result of reading the timestamp counter can vary wildly due to EIST
(speed step technology), turbo modes, and owner overclocking, in addition to
differences in CPUs, as noted. There is quite a bit about this on the
Internet. As I recall,
Sorry for top posting, but Outlook is quoting things correctly.
I did check out your site and based my original setup on it. Lots of
impressive stuff there!
The part I couldn't figure out the fudge time2 values. Using the one that
was pointed out to me by Wolfgang is working very nicely
I checked my home FreeBSD 8.2 NTP server for the clk_jitter reads zero bug,
and yes, I see it too when using PPS kernel discipline.
server 127.127.22.1 flag3 1
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/drivers/driver22.html
So, I need to understand what Controls the kernel PPS discipline
David,
running RPi with GPS+PPS here.
I compiled my own kernel and the one major gotcha I had was an RTFM
issue. The kernel used on the RPi is not the compressed vmlinuz
kernel used on PC's. I recompiled my kernel 10 times or more before I
went back scouring the 'net to find out the kernel in
For maximum eventlog/syslog/ntp.log verbosity:
logconfig =clockall +peerall +syncall +sysall
If you're using recent 4.2.7 and don't expect to ever use older
versions, you can abbreviate:
logconfig =allall
The default without logconfig is:
logconfig =syncall
Cheers,
Dave Hart
Dave Hart wrote in message
news:CAMbSiYAqZsDnuNtcyYGn1XU0JBcK4DB3DHUVnsOiJy6hop6w=w...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 06:20 UTC, David J Taylor wrote:
Presumably, Dave, if the leap second /had/ been inserted, the second
message
would not have happened?
The would have gone
Dave Hart wrote in message
news:CAMbSiYByhGbjTzN8HXwuJVd_1_ez_J-HWE0BNF=ivf_e8_f...@mail.gmail.com...
[]
So there are at least two problems here. First the insertion is not
happening, second when a 1s step occurs later, there's a would have
gone backward that shouldn't be reported. I have an
For what it's worth, I saw no showstopper bugs with either my FreeBSD or
Windows systems.
- The FreeBSD 8.2 fed from the Garmin GPS 18 LVC behaved perfectly. ntpd
4.2.7p255
- The Windows PCs fed from either Garmin GPS 18/x LVC or Sure Electronics
GPS boards appear to have reset itself some
From: Dave Hart
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 5:12 PM
To: David J Taylor
[]
As I mentioned on the pool list, I think there's a bug in the
application of the leap second to the local clock in recent ntpd.
Please check the event log on each of your Windows systems around the
event. If everything
Dave Hart suggested I post the following event log information about leap
second behaviour on various Windows stratum-1 and stratum-2 PCs here..
___
Stratum-1 server PC Alta (Win-7/64 + Sure GPS) (runs 24 x 7)
LevelDate and Time
If your ntpd is relying upon other NTP servers (that is, is stratum 2
or higher), it will not announce the pending leap second starting
exactly at midnight UTC in a few minutes, but should within a few
polling intervals. With the default maximum interval of 1024 seconds
being about 17 minutes,
Michael Tatarinov wrote in message
news:CABrG=ZyThJQchY_q90vNk=mnfwzsjeu0eocjbn0h5ovrmxu...@mail.gmail.com...
Interesting program but not necessary. ntpq need only.
ntpd 4.2.7
ntpq mrv 1 99 srcadr,leap,refid
or for old ntpd
ntpq mrv 59605 59614 srcadr,leap,refid
Folks, I have received the following notice:
__
NOTIFICATION OF A GPS JAMMING EXERCISE SENNYBRIDGE TRAINING AREA, WALES,
DURING THE PERIOD 24 SEPTEMBER - 5 OCTOBER 2012
Details of Low Power Jamming.
Dates: Between 24-28 September and 1-5
Hi again David,
I ran your Leap Trace program against my gps-based time servers and not one
is showing a leap second pending. Not even this one that is leap-second
configured.
GPSCON is showing a leap second pending on my HP Z3801.
This is very mysterious.
R
With all this discussion of leap-seconds, perhaps it's timely to mention my
simple tools for leap-second checking across servers. You will find NTP
Leap trace here:
http://www.satsignal.eu/software/net.htm#NTPLeapTrace
At this instant, fewer than 1 in 10 of the remote servers I'm using are
Folks, I have received the following notice:
__
Notice of Interruption to MSF 60 kHz Time and Frequency Signal
The MSF 60 kHz time and frequency signal broadcast from Anthorn Radio
Station will be shut down over the period:
14 June 2012
from 10:00 BST until
Hi.
From the title, you might (maybe) guess this is about the Raspberry Pi,
and NTP.
I've only had the thing a few days, but been experimenting (playing)
with the default NTP behaviour as seen with ntpq -p on the command line.
[]
It's said, that the RasPi, has about the same cpu grunt as a
I have received the following notice:
__
NOTIFICATION OF GPS JAMMING EXERCISES RAF SPADEADAM, CUMBRIA, SEPTEMBER
2012
Dates: Between the 10th of Sept to the 14th of Sept 2012 inclusive.
Times: 0700 -2000 GMT.
Location of MULTIPLE jammers: Land
Dave Hart h...@ntp.org wrote in message
news:CAMbSiYBLnxaj_x4vch3eNDqwUDX+d5sGcHyr8zBe3Jh0C2K=y...@mail.gmail.com...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Chris Albertson
albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of good discussion here but I found an easy way to stay on-time
while the Internet is down
I must admit I find NTP fascinating, depending on my mood. About 20
years
ago I had written something that attempted to measure the drift in my
computer's clock based on daily *manual* settings while listening to WWV
or
CHU. Room temperature was the biggest factor. I'm still interested in
Hi,
i check ntp with ntpq -p and get:
# ntpq -p
remoterefidst t when poll reach delay offset jitter
=
LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 52 64 3770.000 0.000 0.001
*pluto.mydom 78.79.86.76
It seems that, on Windows at least, ntpq -crv gives results in local time,
and not in UTC. Is that intended? Is there a switch for results in UTC?
ntp 4.2.7p265
Thanks,
David
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
Dave Hart h...@ntp.org wrote in message
news:cambsiyakrebebf3xkohy+v4dyavynqnmeymwhwhhu2ze1g1...@mail.gmail.com...
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 06:05, David J Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
It seems that, on Windows at least, ntpq -crv gives results in local
time,
and not in UTC
David Lord sn...@lordynet.org wrote in message
news:t1bk49-6hi@me6000g.home.lordynet.org...
[]
I'm not sure which value you are referring to. From the
ntpq -p billboard over a day, I see values of jitter
of the GPS as low as 0.002
jitter No of
0.002156
0.003 50
Hi all,
I finally got around to attaching a serial cable to the motherboard
header on my desktop computer and attaching the Sure gps to it. This
NTP+GPS has been a long and winding road, and has been much more
difficult to get a handle on than I anticipated, including ordering a
number of
I have received the following notice
___
NOTIFICATION OF GPS JAMMING EXERCISES SCOTLAND, NORTH AND WEST COASTS,
16-26th APRIL 2012
Dates: Between 16 to 26 April 2012 inclusive.
Times: Intermittent for 1hr slots between 0800BST and 2130BST.
Location
Just wondering:
1) Is the UK govt doing this?
The notice is from a UK Government agency.
2) Is the USA doing anything similar?
I would be surprised if they were not, but they may have more remote areas
to carry out such tests.
3) What's the purpose?
I understand that it's for the
Hi David,
See below.
[]
That's a great tip about PNG files. I never knew anything about them.
They replaced GIF files for many purposes, and not only do they have full
colour, they have better algorithms than GIF so may produce more compact
files. IIRC the major reason for their
All these parameters and permutations are confusing, particularly if
experimenting with Windows and Linux.
Agreed!
Thanks to David Taylor for encouraging me to experiment with
interpolation, using the environment variable
NTPD_USE_INTERP_DANGEROUS=1 to turn on and NTPD_USE_SYSTEM_CLOCK=1 to
Kenyon Ralph ken...@kenyonralph.com wrote in message
news:20120324223442.gd26...@kenyonralph.com...
[text was an attachment]
Please give details of your Internet connection. I wonder about
asymmetrical trip delays.
Cheers,
David
___
A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote in message
news:4f6d5d8f.8080...@acarver.net...
On 3/23/2012 20:48, unruh wrote:
On 2012-03-24, A Cagcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
How often should an individual peer write an entry to the peerstat
log?
Is it supposed to occur every time the peer is
I now have the PPS circuit working on the Sure board. I have not
soldered it yet. I just taped a jumper wire between the PPS test point
at the edge of the board and the DCD pin 1 on the RS-232 port. The
serial data is coming in through the Trendnet TU-S9 serial - USB
converter, which is
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f6dda72.30...@c3energy.com...
[]
Hi David,
You appear to be up early. I'm curious to know what time this email
says it arrived. If it says it arrived at about 1030, then that's my
time. If it says it arrived at about
NOTIFICATION OF GPS JAMMING EXERCISES SALISBURY PLAIN, WILTSHIRE, 7TH MAY
2012
Dates: Between the 7th of May and the 11th of May 2012 (Inclusive).
Times: : 0700 - 2000 GMT.
Location of MULTIPLE jammers: Land based within 5km of N51° 12', W001°
58.5'.
Frequency: A 24 MHz band centred around
Hi all,
YEA! My Sure Electronics GPS just arrived. I ordered on 03/05/12 and
it arrived on 03/23/12, so it took 18 days.
[]
I have a question for someone with experience with the board. If I
unplug the board, will it retain it's programming, or will it lose it?
If it retains it, how long
Folks,
I have received notice that the MSF 60 KHz signal from Anthorn, Cumbria,
UK will be off-air 08:00 UTC Mon 2012-Mar-26 to 20:00 2012-Apr-06. The
service may be off-air continuously during the period, but will be
restored overnight and at the weekend whenever possible.
Cheers,
David
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:xLHar.38386$iq1.34...@newsfe18.iad...
[]
Measure what? Why do you think that ntp reporting the offset with an
extra three decimal points would allow you to measure anything? What in
your mind would you expect to see in that output that would allow
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:uNJar.12581$qc3.8...@newsfe16.iad...
[]
Most likely I would be looking at a histogram of the reported offsets,
and
see whether it was gaussian, flat, or whatever, and how wide. I might
learn something from that.
No. Not if it is just noise.
..
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:7RLar.8362$yd7.6...@newsfe15.iad...
[]
If your system had a precision of -22, I could understand your annoyance
that the reporting was just to usec. But since it is -19, I have much
less understanding of why you are getting upset. That is what I am
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote in message
news:jkgjpo$vf$1...@dont-email.me...
[]
I checked two typical desktops here: ntpq -c rv 0
processor=x86, system=Windows, leap=00, stratum=3, precision=-21,
~477ns ?
.. and I
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote in message
news:e1sa6us-000kpj...@stenn.ntp.org...
David wrote:
2164 needs discussion, unless altering the number of significant digits
in
the ntpq output wouldn't break anything. Do we need to have this
discussion? I have looked through ntpq.c, but I can't
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:dG5ar.18461$pc1.11...@newsfe11.iad...
[]
No confusion. I understood completely. Ron had a machine on GPS which
ran away. You got a report of a 1 sec slippage. The question is whether
or not a 1 sec slippage in the GPS could trigger a runaway on a
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f692255.2020...@c3energy.com...
On 3/20/2012 11:21 AM, David J Taylor wrote:
[]
You /will/ see variation in the serial output from the Sure device, as
you will in many NMEA devices. For the Sure device, one measurement
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:49, David J Taylor wrote:
(Is jitter RMS, SD, peak-to-peak?).
NTP's jitter is root mean squares of offsets from the clock filter
register (last 8 responses, more or less).
Dave Hart
Thanks, Dave. Makes good sense.
Cheers,
David
Markus Schöpflin no.s...@spam.spam wrote in message
news:jkc7l7$o9o$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Am 20.03.2012 13:46, schrieb Harlan Stenn:
On Mar 20, 3:45=A0am, David J Taylordavid-
tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
Any chance of getting bug 2164 moving? =A0Greater precision needed
for n=
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:itmar.5841$yd7@newsfe15.iad...
[]
But -19 is about 2 microseconds if I understand it correctly. That means
that the clocks are incapable of delivering more than about 2
microseconds of accuracy. What is you that last decimal digit of
accuracy in
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f69e531.7070...@c3energy.com...
[]
C) What your ntp plotter plots as the red line on the jitter tab with a
loopstats file. Not sure how that's derived.
Red-line: jitter straight out of the loopstats data. Scale on
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote in message
news:e1satsh-000mhb...@stenn.ntp.org...
My take is the precision output might say your device is -19 so you
know its accuracy is around 2/microseconds. But the offset several
decimal places allows you to see its ever changing accuracy within
that
Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote in message
[]
Since this is an all volunteer service, the fastest, and maybe the
only, way to get this enhancement is to write the code yourself! If you
lack programming skills you could try paying someone to do it.
Richard,
I do have
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:JDU9r.22132$_c5.11...@newsfe09.iad...
[]
Of course the question still is why in the world did the system go nuts
when it was on Local. That itself should not have happened.
If some software had told the system clock to run fast, it simply stays
Any chance of getting bug 2164 moving? Greater precision needed for ntpq
offset report.
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2164
While I'm asking, nothing seems to have happened with bug 1577 in over 18
months. Request that SNMP support be added for the Windows port
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote in message
news:e1s9ysb-000kqp...@stenn.ntp.org...
On Mar 20, 3:45=A0am, David J Taylor david-
tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
Any chance of getting bug 2164 moving? =A0Greater precision needed
for n=
tpq
offset report.
=A0http://bugs.ntp.org
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
[]
Hypothetically speaking, what if I don't want it to distribute time if
it's working in internet mode?
Run a Perl script one a minute, looking for the GPS line in ntpq -p
output, and if the tally code isn't * (or whatever,
It seems that the types of different variables are stored in a
table, and offset has type FL. Latter on, there is a block of
code like this:
case FL:
output(fp, name,
[]
David Taylor is right that it is normal for Windows to keep running
the clock at whatever rate was last set after the program setting the
rate goes away. It's also true that Windows does not have any rate
limits itself -- you can easily tell Windows to advance the clock 1
usec per tick
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:d13ar.7952$gv1.7...@newsfe12.iad...
[]
It is really really hard to imagine any gps device doing that.
Yes, I agree, and yet what just popped up in my mail box but a reference
to:
an inexplicable 1 second slip of 3 GPS based NTP time sources.
I
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:Ur4ar.15722$iq1.15...@newsfe18.iad...
On 2012-03-20, David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid
wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:d13ar.7952$gv1.7...@newsfe12.iad...
[]
It is really really hard to imagine any gps device
Hi all,
I was doing some GPS research and found this site with lots of GPS's and
accessories. Just thought I'd pass it along.
http://www.gpssensors.com/
I don't know which ones are timing GPS's.
Sincerely,
Ron
Ron,
The one I recognise as being a timing GPS with PPS and suitable for NTP
I prefer fiber: 50/50 Mbit, very consistent ping times of a couple of ms
to most no.pool.ntp.org servers. :-)
Cost is about $75/month.
Terje
Maybe I should move to Norway! You are lucky!
I pay US $48 (equivalent) for my 30/1 service!
Cheers,
David
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f65006d.4090...@c3energy.com...
[]
Come to think of it, my comment about the polling interval not
increasing may only apply to a local refclock, not a local server.
You may be right - all the servers on this test system
Rob nom...@example.com wrote in message
news:slrnjmbdn3.9ce.nom...@xs8.xs4all.nl...
Uwe Klein u...@klein-habertwedt.de wrote:
Regular DSL here has quite large and spread line delays
though speed is much higher delay is similar or slightly larger than
forex ISDN.
PING 87.186.242.38
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f65ee78.20...@c3energy.com...
I'm forking the subject line, which didn't really seem relevant any
more.
more below
[]
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Win-8+Internet.html
[]
From my point of view, those look pretty good.
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f65ee78.20...@c3energy.com...
I'm forking the subject line, which didn't really seem relevant any
more.
more below
[]
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Win-8+Internet.html
[]
From my point of view, those look pretty good.
Terje Mathisen terje.mathisen at tmsw.no wrote in message
news:is9e39-6ve2@ntp6.tmsw.no...
[]
You should never accept much more than 10:1 speed difference between
down and up.
Terje
Should - I agree. But in the UK from Virgin Media I have 30 Mb/s down,
1 Mb/s up. I have been promised
John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com wrote in message
news:87sjh7mlqs@thumper.dhh.gt.org...
David J Taylor writes:
But in the UK from Virgin Media I have 30 Mb/s down, 1 Mb/s up. I
have been promised an upload speed increase about 18 months ago to 2
Mb/s up, which is more sensible
You'd get less jitter with DSL.
--
John Hasler
John,
You have piqued my interest. I have just set up a Windows-8 PC with an
ntp configuration not dissimilar to Ron's, in that it's using purely
Internet servers but trying to monitor a local stratum-1 server as well.
In essence:
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f64d793.9010...@c3energy.com...
[]
Hi David,
I'm not sure what will happen if you simultaneously prefer and noselect
the local server. Assuming the local stratum 1 server is the most
stable time source, you'll get a
Hi David,
I really appreciate all these suggestions you shared, as well as past
ones.
Based somewhat on been there, done that!
If I decide to revamp my network, I'll probably put some of them into
use. However, that's not really practical right now. All the
networking gear is in the
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f61168b.8030...@c3energy.com...
[]
PS to my prior message.
I don't think the problem so much is the delay to the internet servers,
or even to get out of my house. NTPD is supposed to take care of that
as long as it's
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:56, David J Taylor
wrote:
If I have a configuration including:
_
server 192.168.0.7 minpoll 5 maxpoll 5iburst
server 0.uk.pool.ntp.org iburst minpoll 10
_
how often should the loopstats
Is that unit compatible with the Sure board? Wouldn't you need some
sort of antenna connector adapter? Will the Sure board provide power to
it?
Sincerely,
Ron
- compatible, probably. Is +26 gain dB enough? It's the lower end of
specifications for puck antennas.
- adapter required,
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote in message
news:jjqdat$82m$1...@dont-email.me...
Folks,
I'm interested to know whether my install of NTP on FreeBSD 8.2 includes
SNMP support or not. If it doesn't, then I may try a recompile, but
first:
1 - can anyone point me
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f61e4df.4080...@c3energy.com...
[]
I mainly meant that operating conditions will vary the frequency of the
oscillator. Speaking of which, is there a way to run ntpd and have it
NOT adjust the clock at all, but still
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:Fdo8r.12214$v11.9...@newsfe20.iad...
[]
The clock filter selects the data with the smallest round trip time, to
fix the problem with asymmetric round trips (on the theory tht the
shortest time is more likely to be symmetric round trip).
The filter is
Hi David,
OK, you've convinced me. I've put noselect on the GPS and taken it away
on the New York NIST server. The NY NIST server is now preferred and
polling from 1 - 4 minutes. Hopefully they won't ban me for hitting it
too often. I think the NIST server will have more jitter,
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:I1T7r.36416$l12.35...@newsfe23.iad...
[]
Did you shut down and restart your computer? Did you perchance do this
during the daylight savings time transition on a Windows system? Could
the error be related to the fact that Windows like time on
Alby VA alb...@empire.org wrote in message
news:2ece7b6a-e150-432d-b23a-a4bde46df...@j11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
[]
Hm, what do you think about this command for getting
loopstat data?
tail -n1 -r loopstats | awk '{print $3}'
tail -n1 -r loopstats = This looks at the last line of the
Alby VA alb...@empire.org wrote in message
news:0d4f588e-bab6-4706-826e-299149054...@i2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
[]
Thanks. That bug report sounds like the best plan of attack.
Can that bug report be tracked to see if any action is taken?
Yes, it's number 2164. See:
Hi David,
OK. You asked for it. 8-)
Well, I actually suggested /all/ the Internet servers being enabled,
allowing NTP to make its best choice.
When I'm through testing, I'll open up the other internet servers as a
backup in case the GPS fails. For now, I'm just running with one clock
Alby VA alb...@empire.org wrote in message
news:ed7bfa7e-3754-43f0-bd72-0efc709cd...@s7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
[]
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2164
Thanks. I'm going to watch and see what comes of this bug.
I agree, the ntpq output should be able to give you nanosecond
Folks,
I'm interested to know whether my install of NTP on FreeBSD 8.2 includes
SNMP support or not. If it doesn't, then I may try a recompile, but
first:
1 - can anyone point me to the correct place to download the appropriate
MIB? I did find:
Ron Frazier (NTP) timekeepingntpl...@c3energy.com wrote in message
news:4f60bc0c.8040...@c3energy.com...
[]
OK. Here are the loopstats from another computer for 7 days (in the
chart). I don't have any peerstats for it. It has the same server
list. One is preferred. All servers are active.
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:HI48r.39505$zd5.1...@newsfe12.iad...
On 2012-03-14, David J Taylor wrote:
[]
Windows uses UTC internally, not local time. Local time is simply a
presentation layer issue. Windows is unaffected by a DST transition.
That must be new, since
Hi David T,
NOW you understand.
I have 4 PC's connected to the LAN, plus my wife's work computer 3 days
/ week, and on rare occasions my son's computer. All are connected by
wifi. All do pretty mundane things: web browser, email, sometimes
downloading patches, sometimes doing online
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote in message
news:wf78r.33384$kv1.26...@newsfe03.iad...
[]
Just wanted to report here. I switched the antennae on the two Sure GPS
I have. Both worked fine for about 4 days, and suddenly the antenna that
had failed before failed again-- no sattelites found.
So, I am
Alby VA alb...@empire.org wrote in message
news:66d5d8bc-f063-4f3e-a6d8-676a9b045...@w1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
[]
The Stratum 0 devices is SureGPS and its running on FreeBSD as the OS
and AMD for the chip.
FreeBSD godzilla.empire.org 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue
Feb 21
Alby VA alb...@empire.org wrote in message
news:7824f31d-b72c-44eb-9eeb-b219a7543...@gr6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
[]
ntp2.usno.navy. .USNO. 1 u 11h 1280 21.392
11.022 0.000
-ntp0.usno.navy. .USNO. 1 u 512 128 370 25.747
-0.242 3.378
+ntp1.usno.navy.
Okay. My whole understanding of NTP and Clocks is now
becoming clearer. My apologies, I'm still a n00b.
So what you are saying is the GPS time via the SureGPS
device is now being ignored and the time of my machine is
now being held in check by the PPS signal? If yes, does
that mean seeing
1 - 100 of 1159 matches
Mail list logo
