gnette could use a metadata line to declare strong
vignette dependencies, for example:
%\VignetteDepends{StepReg, BiocStyle, kableExtra}
Indeed, having it listed in Suggests plus the \VignetteDepends
declaration should suffice.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
(I haven't checked if this list is complet
is apparently different from
the one you are using here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
rust code. This
was not indicated in your mail, hence you got direct rejection.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks, we see:
Size of tarball: 18099770 bytes
Please reudce to less than 5 MB for a CRAN package.
Best,
Yes, prqlr is a great Rust-based package! My other Rust base
On 18.04.2024 15:48, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 18.04.2024 15:43, Ben Bolker wrote:
To clarify, from an off-list conversation:
AFAICT the chain is
dotwhisker Imports
margins, which Imports
prediction, which Enhances
ffbase (archived in 2022 for 'coercion
pointed out that Enhances is a dependency *in
the opposite direction* -- i.e. if A Enhances B, it's not entirely clear
why the disappearance of B should matter at all ...)
The year old check notes in prediciton matter, not the level of any
dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 2024-04-18
CRAN has still not received an update and asked for this each
month this year, so in Jan, Feb, and March without a response, so we
assume prediction is unmaintained. Also, this was escalated to reverse
depends.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 2024-04-18 9:28 a.m., Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
The cascade is e
Use the URL firld of the package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.04.2024 20:27, Ruff, Sergej wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if its possible to link the toturial site for a package on the
CRAN Cite to the package?
I want to publish the next version of our package.
The CRAN site (https://cran.r
s software directly, I believe.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.04.2024 16:05, Jan van der Laan wrote:
Interesting. That would also mean that putting a company repo first does
not protect against dependency confusion attacks (people intentionally
uploading packages with the same name as compan
On 02.04.2024 14:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 April 2024 at 17:44, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| Untested:
|
| install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
| are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
| That can be a user defined filter.
Untested:
install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
That can be a user defined filter. It should be possible to write a user
defined filter which prefers the packages in your local repo.
that depends on
Matrix ABI ...
This is only in the on demand check queue (not the daily CRAN repository
checks nor the incoming checks) due to a recently checked Matrix in that
queue (that would be auto-removed soon, but I'll trigger this manually now).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 2024-03-17 4:42 p.m
Unfortunately, due to a temporary bug in R-devel, the check result
changed before you looked at it.
Now foxed and back to the older state where the check.log was sufficient
to see the issue.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.03.2024 17:09, Maciej Nasinski wrote:
Hey All,
I want to help fix the M1mac
your mail
message's "From" field ...
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Suggested packages should be used conditionally. If available, use it,
otherwise the code should fail gracefully.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.03.2024 11:58, Yohann Foucher wrote:
Dear R-Members,
I just have submitted an update of the ‘survivalSL' package because the last version
depends
OK, can you pls submit that one to CRAN again?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.03.2024 16:53, Christophe Dervieux wrote:
Hi,
yes I have defined in DESCRIPTION
VignetteBuilder:
quarto
and running `tools:::loadVignetteBuilder` on the package source
directory reads it correctly
So you have defined
VignetteBuilder: quarto
??
Best,
Uwe
On 26.02.2024 21:28, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:50 PM Christophe Dervieux wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to release a new version of the quarto R package. This new
version is adding support for a new vignette engine
There is one Uwe Ligges but > 2 packages.
On 12.02.2024 20:52, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 20 January I submitted a revised version of my eglhmm package, to
CRAN. I very rapidly got an email, emanating from Uwe Ligges' address,
saying:
Dear maintainer,
thanks, package eglhmm_0.1-2.tar
Your users may also use old versions of clang. Hence please correct it.
CRAN is also checking with the clang18 release candidate.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 09.02.2024 15:59, Marcin Jurek wrote:
Dear community,
I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied on
Boost
Dear Naras,
the queues are empty, so everything has been processed.
Which package are you talking about? Then I can take a look what went wrong.
Best,
Uwe
On 01.02.2024 15:53, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote:
Just FYI: Winbuilder seems to be unresponsive. My uploads over the last
2 days have
For the BioC installation:
For all CAN work, I simply use install.packages() after adding/setting
the BioC repo/mirror which perfectly well resolves the dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.01.2024 16:56, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
Hello R-package-devel,
What would you
quot;cre" role and that's all the
further involvement of the CRAN team with the package (besides the
excellent checks on CRAN)?
Ideally the latter.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
For anyone considering it, I analyzed a bit the situation of XML and
RCurl: https://llrs.dev/post/2023/05/03/cran-mainta
On 24.01.2024 15:59, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:51 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
Dear package developers,
the CRAN team (and Professor Ripley in particular) has been the defacto
maintainer of CRAN package 'XML'.
Our hope was that maintainers of packages depending on XML
.
I won't spend more time on any discussions. We are just looking for a
volunteer.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best
Le 24/01/2024 à 15:59, Jeroen Ooms a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:51 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
Dear package developers,
the CRAN team (and Professor Ripley in particular) has been
dozens of strong dependencies on XML.
So we are looking for a person volunteering to take over 'XML'.
Please let us know if you are interested.
For the CRAN team,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo
Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO.
But I really cannot resist:
You omitted a line from our message that actually explains it. We wrote:
"Do remember to look at the 'Additional issues'."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 20.01.2024 20:38, Johann Gaebler wrote:
Hi ev
are random, there is no straightforward way to tell the defender about
exceptions. Hence please follow the advice and tell cmake to compile
static libraries instead of executables (an excellent idea, thanks!).
[Microsoft knows about this for several weeks now without action.]
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I am un
not resolve to servers in your part of the world.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 13.01.2024 15:01, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Fascinating, now it worked with the latest winbuilder submission 3 times
in a row when I checked it manually. So maybe Ivan was right and there
was a very demanding set of other packages compiling at the same time?
I don't know.
Serge, Can you somply
to CRAN?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.01.2024 14:12, Uwe Ligges wrote:
I can take a look, but not sure if I get to it before monday.
I haven't seen it for any other packages recently.
My suspicion is currently a strange mix of cmd.exe and sh.exe calls. But
this is a very wild guess.
Best,
Uwe
I can take a look, but not sure if I get to it before monday.
I haven't seen it for any other packages recently.
My suspicion is currently a strange mix of cmd.exe and sh.exe calls. But
this is a very wild guess.
Best,
Uwe
On 13.01.2024 14:08, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 13.01.2024 10:10, Ivan
On 13.01.2024 10:10, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:19:00 +0100
Serge пишет:
After somme minor midficiations, I make a try on the winbuilder site.
I was able to build the archive with the static library
but I get again a Bad address error. You can have a look
repos=r)
i.e. needs PACKAGES files and sources/binaries in relevant directories
such as
./src (at least)
and ideally also
./bin/windows/contrib/4.2/
./bin/windows/contrib/4.3/
./bin/windows/contrib/4.4/
and similarly for mac.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Regardless, thank you for the feedback! I'll adjust
that package or say something like
" and if an authorization token is to be extracted on Windows, the
'arcgisbinding' package is needed that can be installed as explained at
<https://r.esri.com>."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Is there another approach that can be taken here? The one requested
feels like
rs have to choose a non-default setting to include Suggests.
Also note that the maintainer builds the vignette whe calling
R CMD build
CRAN checks whether the vignette can be build.
If a user installs a package, the already produced vignette (on the
maintainers machine by R CMD build) is instaled. The
field of
the DESCRIPTION file (as a comma-separated list of repository URLs) or
for other means of access, described in the ‘Description’ field. "
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.01.2024 18:19, Josiah Parry wrote:
Thanks, both. I'm not familiar with Additional_repositories. Must the
pack
On 03.01.2024 17:58, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/01/2024 11:33 a.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
I have a scenario where I have an exported function that requires the
installation a package that *is not* available on CRAN. The body of the
function is generally:
fx <- function() {
oncranpkg::gx()
}
As required, this package is in the Suggests field. But this results in a
note:
checking package dependencies ... NOTE
Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘noncranpkg’
Can this be safely ignored?
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
[[alternative HTML ve
on to toy examples and wrap
in \donttest{}.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I haven’t encountered the miktex exception file before but i suspect its a
side effect of a miktex error. Packages should not leave files behind in
the temp directory. If you expect a miktex error you need to remove the
file. If you
to reproduce...
The third note I am unsure what it means:
* checking for detritus in the temp directory ... NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
'lastMiKTeXException'
This can typically be ignored.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Kind regards
Christiaan
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 15:55, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Dear package developers,
reminder as announced on the CRAN web page for some months now:
the CRAN submission queue closes and will be offline from Dec 22 to Jan
8 due to CRAN team vacations and maintainance work on the CRAN check farm.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This was a temporary hicc up on the machine and we triggered new checks.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 15.12.2023 02:29, Wilke, Claus O wrote:
Hello,
I just tried to submit my package ggridges to CRAN and got an error during the
pretest on Windows. I have no idea what the error means, and my package
/sh: line 1:
/x86_64-w64-mingw32.static.posix/bin/g++: Bad address |
A search indicate that the problem is from the "D:" (not sure it is the correct
answer)
Well, the missing d: or /d/ in the last line of your cited output.
Which package is this? Then I could take a look into
Have you sent a note to the Mac maintainer already?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.12.2023 21:52, Jonathan Keane wrote:
Thank you to the CRAN maintainers for maintenance and keeping the all
of the CRAN infrastructure running.
I'm seeing a long delay in builds on CRAN for r-oldrel-macos-x86_64.
I'm
Thanks for your offer to providing us with capable multicore servers and
support staff for continuing support of recent Fedora systems.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.12.2023 18:09, andrew--- via R-package-devel wrote:
I do think that its a reasonable ask that the test machines be running
operating
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks!
Sharon
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
,
Uwe Ligges
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 9:54 AM Rafael Ayala Hernandez <
rafael.ayalahernan...@oist.jp> wrote:
ello,
I have added some functions to read binary files in my asteRisk package.
The binary files that are read contain just arrays of coefficients and
metadata about these.
I woul
ersion of the retired winbuilder severs we kept the same OS
version for almost 10 years.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Tatsuya
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package
rhaps CRAN
occasionally adjusts its User-Agent to avoid some of these challenges? Not
sure.
Aron
This (status 400) underlies manual inspection and we let this pass.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/
upon submission of axt2axt that paropt is well
prepared for submissions once ast2ast got released.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best Konrad
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
-devel because of the
settings of my Windows system?
Best, Ulrike
Am 14.11.2023 um 17:16 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
On 14.11.2023 15:45, Ulrike Groemping wrote:
Dear package developers,
I am struggling with an error on R devel (all flavors) that I cannot
reproduce with a freshly installed R-devel
o plotmath as in the instance further above in
your code where you already wrote
titel <- as.expression(bquote("Plot for "*.(xnam)*", "*alpha ==
.(alpha)))
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Calls: halfnormal ... -> plot -> plot.default -> localTitle
-> title
Execu
and otherwise, e.g., in examples, use
tempdir() as a location for writing files.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I don't know really what this note mean and can I put the package
anyway to Cran?
Best regards,
Karolina
[[alternative HTML version deleted
On 01.11.2023 03:51, Mikael Jagan wrote:
Thanks. It seems that we were mistaken in our feeling (IIRC) that it would
be "OK" to implicitly require '--no-manual' on versions of R from 3.5.0 to
4.2.1, not changing our Depends.
We will fix this in Matrix 1.6-2, probably by conditionalizing or
It was 0.0-20 that had another issue now explained privately. 0.0-21
passes cleanly.
Best,
Uwe
On 17.10.2023 20:45, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:08:28 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look.
This seems to be about the eglhmm
of those examples?
2) If this is the case:
Is it possible to load it only once per CMD check?
Typically it is loaded once for the examples, once for each test file
and once for each vignette that uses it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Sincerely,
Leonard
__
R
Certainly there was more in the output that caused rejection as the
stuff you describe below seems to be fine.
I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look.
Best,
Uwe
On 16.10.2023 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Whoops, I just read the next line. Sorry!
On 15/10/2023 9:34
This is under discussion with the CRAN team now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.10.2023 09:06, Tony Wilkes wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to publish an R package to CRAN. Their checks come back with 2 NOTES. The first one is
saying that the package is a new submission, and the second one
your package (after acceptance) with R versions linked
against OpenBLAS, MKL, ATLAS etc.
Binaries are always linked against Rblas for maximal compatibility.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
--Sameh
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
efficient, but it does the job.
Or perhaps you simply look for defining a new class (I'd use S3) where
the output is a specific data frame (with some prefedined columns) to
which you assign a class attribute?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r
y to check where things go wrong regarding the
number of cores? It is not easy to find the source of the problems
when there are many examples and tests.
If it is OK on winbuilder but not on Linux, then likely something makes
use of multithreading.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Regard
On 14.09.2023 23:35, Leonard Mada wrote:
Dear Uwe,
I found out what is going on. There is an example:
## Write the pdb object in file "Rpdb.pdb" into the current directory
write.pdb(pdb, file = "Rpdb.pdb")
In examples, you should write to tempdir(), if at al
The spellng is fine and not a problem.
For
* checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
‘Rpdb.pdb’
You need to move this to ./inst or a subdirectory or, if data, consider
./extdata See Writing R Extensions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
nless you want
to add additional restrictions that are permitted by GPL-3 such as
attribution requirements.
No idea what usethis::use_gpl3_license() does.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
* Many examples use `\%in\%` instead of `%in%.
Hopefully, this is fixed now. But it was quit a hassle to find out which
f
John can you point us to an example?
Where is it in your package and what is the R CMD check output?
Guess: Within an Rd file you have to escape the % characters otherwise
they start a comment.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.09.2023 00:30, Spencer Graves wrote:
I've encountered similar issues
.
If that (relicensing) is nt possible, you cannpt bundle such software
components in a single package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.08.2023 17:04, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
About licensing,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 17:30, SHIMA Tatsuya wrote:
Hi Ivan, thanks for taking the time to look at all the details
that packages do
not use more than 2 cores by default.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.08.2023 02:05, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Aug 26, 2023, at 11:01 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 25 August 2023 at 18:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| The real problem is that there are two stubborn groups opposing
wing
the "using_rust" documentation.
In addition, it was mentined already to get the authorship straight.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.08.2023 17:28, SHIMA Tatsuya wrote:
Hi Tim, thank you for sharing this information. i didn't know this.
If this is the cause, the problem seems to ha
Thanks.This was pending a manual inspection for newbies (packages).
ALthough, we also have no mail with test results (I guess a CRAN
server's mail issue when this hot checked), so I just triggered new checks.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 28.08.2023 00:37, John Harrold wrote:
Oh I'm sorry. It's
. That generally doesn't take very long (typically less than
an hour). I wanted to know if there was something on the backend that was
causing a delay, or if there was something wrong and I needed to resubmit
it.
Not that I know. If you told us which package this is about ...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
of behaviour?
Yes, that would be my hope, too.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Scott
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 14:30, Uwe Ligges
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
I (any many collegues here) have been caught several times by the
following example:
1. did something in
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [577s/63s] NOTE
Re-building vignettes had CPU time 9.2 times elapsed time
--> Do not use more than 2 cores
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 24.08.2023 13:42, Fred Viole wrote:
Hi, I am receiving a NOTE upon submission regarding the re-building of
vignet
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I would vote for explicitly addressing this (rhetorical?) question to the CRAN
server administrators...
On August 23, 2023 6:31:01 AM PDT, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
I (any many collegues here) have been caught several times by the following
example:
1. did something in parallel
aim for more should be
able to increase the defaults.
Do you believe a software that auto-occupies a 96 core machines with 96
threads by default is sensible?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 21.08.2023 21:59, Berry Boessenkool wrote:
If you add that to each exported function, isn't that a lot
R CMD check --as-cran on the package gives
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
URL: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/18M1186411
From: man/llig.Rd
Status: 403
Message: Forbidden
CRAN will snpect this manually and let is pass.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I can access
akeCluster() for
paallelization, but the underlying code does multihreading on 20 cores.
Then we end up in 20*20 threads on the machine slowing down the machine
and processes of other uers.
Hence, defaults should also not be more than 2. Simply allow the user to
ask for more.
Best,
On 12.08.2023 23:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 12 August 2023 at 18:12, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| On 12.08.2023 15:10, Jamie Lentin wrote:
| > The system call in question is done by the TMB package[2], and not ours
| > to tinker with:
| >
| > cmd <- paste("R --vanil
ot declare any SystemRequirements. Please do
so and mention gdb.
Wrapping it in "if (gdb is on the path)" seems a good solution.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
If this is a silly idea, which I suspect it is, would a resubmission
removing the example be accepted or just raise red flags? Thi
term workarounds that'd bring
the package back without changing maintainers? If so I will give a bit more
time before re-submitting with myself as the maintainer.
Right.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Cheers,
Ogan
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:16 PM Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:56:31 -0700
Ogan
ge.png
Just sharing in case you hadn't noticed that yet.
Cheers,
-James
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:33 PM Uwe Ligges
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
On 12.07.2023 09:40, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> CRAN submissions are curre
On 12.07.2023 09:40, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Dear developers,
CRAN submissions are currently partly not possible due to some
infrastructure issues. Please so NOT contact us if you see "Unpacking
failed. Please make sure the tar.gz was created with R CMD build. [...]".
In addition,
ages (CRAN
pretest) is currently delayed by 2 days.
Both issues are known and CRAN sysadmins will work on the issues.
Note that this year's CRAN submission summer break will be from Jul 21,
2023 to Aug 7, 2023.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
for the CRAN team
__
,
Uwe Ligges
The ‘Additional_repositories’ field is a comma-separated list of repository
URLs where the packages named in the other fields may be found. It is currently
used by R CMD check to check that the packages can be found, at least as source
packages (which can be installed on any
for CRAN packages is the 5MB threshold
for the source package size.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Note that the package was smaller when it started (in 2013). (Note that the
last time I checked its size, the largest (not just headers) package I know
of on CRAN still was about twice as large still.)
Anyway
namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... NOTE
Package suggested but not available for checking: 'dartR.sim'
This is OK, once the former is explained.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Can I explain when I submit that dartR.sim will be there (as mentioned the
examples run fine
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_emmeans.html).
Since we want to submit v1.5-5 of PowerTOST soon, any ideas?
Please go ahead. Simon rarely updates the check results, so I guess this
was a coincidence at the time and never got updated. I'd ignore this one.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
ll so you have to do that (directly and not via this list). My sense is
that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.
Yes, CRAN will accept this case.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Good luck, Dirk
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.c
nicode character 冷 (U+51B7) (inputenc) not set up for
Can you send me a minimal example package with these characters in an Rd
file?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
> use with LaTeX. [and many more of the same] * checking
> PDF version of manual without index ... ERROR
> -
On 16.05.2023 14:02, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 5/16/23 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 16.05.2023 01:46, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello, All:
The sos package is failing some CRAN checks, complaining:[1]
LaTeX errors:
! Missing $ inserted.
$
l.303 {\tt pspline_
got from some sos
request? I cannot reproduce it currently.
So check:
Does your package pass check if some function names including an
underscore in the name is retunred from an sos request?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
! Emergency stop.
$
l.303 {\tt pspline_
packages are preinstalled).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Ideally, Bioconductor packages would be in Suggests, because if they are not,
the package binary will be effectively broken for most users as they cannot
install it without additional steps (and no stable state can be guaranteed,
either). That's
Indeed, a hicc up of the Windows builder.
Should be resolved.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.04.2023 10:48, Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your prompt advices.
I am not an expert….
I have sent an email to explain that those are likely to be issues on the
CRAN’s end, and to inform
anyone know the best procedure?
Also, given that this isn't a transfer of ownership, I'm still the same
person with a different name, would that make this process easier?
Same process as we do not know whether it is the same person behind the
other mail address.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thank you
the file to R-release, and I get
automatic emails every other day from Uwe Ligges telling me my package
has been checked and built.
Interesting, you shouild receive one mail for each upload.
Can yoiu tell me when you got an unexpected one? Can you forward it to me?
I do not see a package in any
have to have qpdf installed and on your PATH.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
The user should set the CRAN+BioC via setRepositories() and then run
install.packages() will install all dependencies automatically.
Of course, if you install from a local repository without the required
packages or from a USB drive, R cannot resolve dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.03.2023 13:09, Ruff, Sergej wrote:
Thanks,
I thought about changing it to "Imports", but will it cause any issues when
CRAN runs checks on my package and limma isn´t available on CRAN?
No, BioC is a mainstream repository.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
-devel-windows-x86_64 machine (at the very
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
least, the CPU description of win-builder matches that from
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_flavors.html#r-devel-windows-x86_64>).
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org
/in a browser.
This link is a harmless bit of fluff (click through if you want to
see), but I don't want it causing hiccups in my CRAN submission (i.e., I
could take it out if necessary but would prefer not to ...)
Suggestions?
Keep and submit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
===
* checking CRAN
it) as corresponding graphics hardware is not available on the
build/check machines, but if possible you shopudl support that users
with the required hardware can compile the package from sources on
Windows, too.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r
bout 70/95 seconds on most other platforms)
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang/lme4-00check.html
Not shown anymore, I guess ome hicc up on the check machine.
Or in case you download data some internet access issue?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Does anyone have i
1 - 100 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
