Welcome Constantin, please take a look at the slides.
Hans
Chris Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, May 09, 2001 04:54:00 AM -0700 Hans Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:26:23PM +0200, Philippe Gramoulle wrote:
Just wanted to let you know my benchmarks on a dual 650Mhz, SCSI disks
and 2.4.4 + 1.5 Go
Andrey Tulenev wrote:
Hello reiserfs-list,
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.1/0358.html
http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626
--
Best regards, [Team òõäîÉË]
Andrey mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pager: 913-5353
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
For now we do not want it to be ran by boot scripts. So, 3.x.0k will just ignore
-f and -a.
Ooops, I meant: -f and -a will make reiserfsck to do nothing but print its version.
whereas -r and -p are ignored.
Thanks,
vs
Dirk Haage wrote:
On 18 May 2001 10:17:03 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
You should use ftp.namesys.com.
Thanks,
vs
It should be fixed by now, and reiserfs.org and reiserfs.net should work by now.
Hmm, I just get some Infos from domaindiscover
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a company
waiting for the server to come up.
Then they should have a sysadmin that knows how to disable it.
This is not a policy, its just a reasonable
Chris Mason wrote:
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 06:40:48 PM +0200 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sam, 19 Mai 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
fsck should never be run automatically. That sysadmin might have a
company waiting for the server to come up.
Then they should have
Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 22:10, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Peter Braam writes:
File system journal recovery can corrupt a snapshot, because it
copies data that needs to be preserved in a snapshot. During
journal replay such data may be copied again, but the source
Xuan Baldauf wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 02:00:36 AM +0200 Jens Benecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
when working on files (i.e. having open files) on my laptop reiserfs
accesses the disk every 5 seconds. this effectively prevents the disk from
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
ReiserFS developers:
What is the status of the reiserfs-raw branch? Is it still being
maintained, or has it been completely postponed awaiting finding
space/resources/time for a more generic filesystem interface mechanism
for such applications?
The last known
Philip R. Auld wrote:
Hi folks,
I noticed recently that a good number of the files in the
reiserfsprogs-3.x.0j contain only a Copyright Hans Reiser with no
reference to the README file that puts them under the GPL. Are these files
intentionally non-GPLed
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Dirk Haage wrote:
Am 03 Jul 2001 21:18:34 +0400 schrieb Nikita Danilov:
[some performance tests]
[Table skipped.]
ReiserFS is extremely fast with simple file system operations; as soon as
parallel
accesses of several processes takes place, the
Florin Andrei wrote:
- XFS is very fast when it comes to reading/writing to/from very large
files, especially when you need high sustained I/O rates, and more
especially under concurrent access and in multi-CPU environments (no
wonder it does that, because that's what it was designed for).
Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS is
crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it uses 4x as much
processing power to do metadata operations, and in general is slower
because of the journal. My benchmarks don't
Xuan Baldauf wrote:
* Tails-directories are slower by factor 3.7 than notails-directories. Is there any
way to optimize? My intuition says that tails-directories should be faster than
notails-directories, because due to the less data to be read, there should be less
disk accesses needed to
Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:
The hash is only 23 bits. From 7 up to 30. Low bits (0-6) are used to store
generation counter. Highest bit (31) is left 0, because offset in file in GNU
system is signed integer (off_t which is long int).
Thanks for all your help.
The new hash is now working
Christian Gottschalch wrote:
re All !
i've to set up a low coast filer(NFS-Server)on an dual
intel(866MHz) machine, an icp scsi raid controller, an
easyraid(HW-Raid with 250Gig) now i've to check some
filesystems(reiserfs,xfs,jfs,gfs...), how stable it works, performace etc. now i
need an
so we will have to try testing them more individually (or find the bug).
Thanks for your patience.
Hans
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi
Hans Reiser wrote:
Observations:
* Creating the files on reiserfs is twice as fast as xfs
* With notail it's even four times faster, 8 times faster than xfs!
* XFS much faster then reiserfs for duing find . -type f|xargs cat
Suprising to me
Stefan Fleiter wrote:
Hi Dirk!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Dirk Mueller wrote:
--- dir.c~ Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.cWed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
[..]
This chunk is still missing in 2.4.7-pre6. Is it possible to submit this to
Linus ?
You are perfectly right and for me it
pcg@goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:53:59PM +0200, Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me packing tails sounds like an excellent way to improve performance,
(not only for you)
especially for lots of small files. That it performs much worse than
Spacemonkey! wrote:
On 17 Jul 2001 13:33:23 +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi
Spacemonkey! wrote:
Greetings from the land of cheese.
Which one is that?
Uh, well this one happens to be Switzerland; but I forget myself! I
guess that this could also be France, Tillamook
simone gps wrote:
-- Messaggio inoltrato --
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Help! Redhat 7.1 and reiserfs!
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:54:57 +0400
From: Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: simone gps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
simone gps wrote:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Fre, 20 Jul 2001, Jan Johansson wrote:
automatically checks? I looked trough the list archives, but couldnt find
much.. or i didnt look closely enough.
man 5 fstab:
The sixth field, (fs_passno), is used by the fsck(8) pro
gram to determine
Federico Sevilla III wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 at 16:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for some documentation relating to the differences
between the main 3 journaling filesystems, and why some would be more
appropriate in some situations than others.
Comparing the three will
David Rees wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:44:24PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but if you were to write a 1gb file, then type halt,
you could get a corrupted file instead of a perfect one, yes?
I don't know, you're reiserfs expert. ;-) I would guess
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:40:43PM -0700, Gregory S. Youngblood
wrote:
The problem is that ls -U (for unsorted list), or just place ls or
du, on this specific directory does not return anything and just
thrashes the hard drive ( and CPU to a lesser
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:40:43PM -0700, Gregory S. Youngblood
wrote:
The problem is that ls -U (for unsorted list), or just place ls or
du, on this specific directory does not return anything and just
thrashes the hard drive ( and CPU to a lesser
The starvation occurs when some process sends large requests to the same scsi
controller as our journal replay which sends one block requests, and the one
block requests starve. Raid-resync is one known instance where this happens.
Edward's patch cures that instance.
Hans
Edward Shushkin
So I bet you that our patches that you assembled didn't go in simply because he
was packing suitcases, and not for any reason deeper than that. We'll try for
2.4.10.
Hans
buags wrote:
i installed reiserfs on my disk and the same file(s) are bigger on the
reisefs partition then a ext2
Did the files have holes, and did you use cp instead of tar? Did you account
for space used by the log?
Hans
Chris Dukes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:26:23PM -0700, Max Clark wrote:
Is there a way to create a Raid Volume spanning multiple disks using
Reiserfs? I would like to create a Raid 5 group across four hard drives.
Software RAID on Linux (md devices) have nothing to do with
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Aug 31, 2001 15:43 +0200, Groo, El Errante wrote:
Apologize me about my ignorance, but with this procedure can be any data
lost?.. I don't have any other 260GB to make a backup. If this procedure is
safe, I will do it immediatly and send you the reports.
Nikita Danilov wrote:
Philippe Gramoulle writes:
Object: Latest kernel to use.
Hi,
I've seen in the 2.4.10pre4 ChangeLog that there have been some
ReiserFS update. (but i dont know wich ones in fact)
I also saw that latest ac kernel includes NFS client update which can
Philippe Gramoulle wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
Hmmm, you didn't quite answer his question. Philippe, whether you use the -ac
series or 2.4.10-pre4 is not a reiserfs issue, and we honestly don't yet know
which is more stable in matters not reiserfs. Both should be equally the most
Chris Mason wrote:
On Friday, September 07, 2001 11:45:31 AM +0400 Hans Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is worth noting that what started it off was:
It all started with a small patch to the journaling flash filesystem
(JFFS) code which caused the following to be printed
There are two possible reasons you had trouble with mkreiserfs:
* it writes to different blocks on the drive than mke2fs (and presumably hit the
bad blocks you later remapped).
* random chance.
Maybe we should put it on our feature wish list to have mkreiserfs do some light
testing of the
Hubert Chan wrote:
This may be a bit of an unusual request but...
I'm just starting my Master's degree in Computer Science (actually a
month ago), and I'm looking around for possible thesis topics (or maybe
for my Ph.D. too). I thought that maybe the ReiserFS crowd may have run
into
Volkmar Woinke wrote:
Dear Mr. Reiser:
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to contribute
towards your filesystem!
As far as my preparation goes: are there any
publications that you might suggest off the top of
your head, that would help me gain an insight and
better understanding
Hans Reiser wrote:
How about looking at how writes and reads are performed 4k at a time, and
evaluating whether you can cause large writes and reads to be performed as large
writes and reads? flx, put him on the reiserfs-dev mailing list so that he is
kept aware of iicache code
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi
Harald Barth wrote:
I do not think so. The problem probably appeared not recently, but
some time ago. But, if you found a reliable way (either with this
arlad or with something else) to get files sharing one objectid that
would help us to find
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi
Rutger Swarts wrote:
Can you provide description of names and sizes of those files?
The files are small (between 1894 and 3682) images that together make up a
huge high-detail map. The names look like this:
Map.xXX.yYY.gif
where
avante avante wrote:
I just read you're not supposed to mix reiserfs and
linux 2.4.3.
Unfortunately I didn't know that until today and
that's exactly what I've been doing with Mandrake 8.
Nothing unusual has happened so far but does anyone
know what could happen and if I should move
Wait, this is a user who is afraid to compile a kernel, and you are advising he
go with some non-standard experimental kernel?
He should get the latest Linus Torvalds standard kernel, install it, if he gets
lost doing it he should go to www.namesys.com/support.html and we will support
him all
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Oct 31, 2001 17:09 +0100, Klaus Ridder wrote:
This limits the filesize to 16 ExaBytes. Still enough, I
think. :-)
However, assuming that disc capacity is doubled every 12 month, and assuming
that 1 Terabyte is what we have today, we will have 16
Nikita will help with this.
Hans
Dave Mason wrote:
Further to my previous comments, I made a big ext2 partition so I
could copy over the whole directory. It worked fine. I have now run
it several times copying to reiserfs over nfs, with the following
result:
[root@fs /home]# du -sk *
Jens Benecke wrote:
What I meant is this: AFAIK, if you exclude broken hardware, in ext2 there
is no chance of a file that was never written to since mounting being
corrupted on a crash, even if the fs was mounted read-write.
Is this the same thing with ReiserFS?
Yes.
Torrey Hoffman wrote:
I've been putting together a new workstation, and in the process of
building and testing it I ran into an odd performance anomaly. It
probably only matters for people benchmarking different reiserfs
setups, but I'd like to know what causes it.
In short: If you make
Adam Goryachev wrote:
I usually lurk here, but here is my 0.022c worth..
That's entirely correct point. Because it can be viewed as a situation
where one man pays for everybody in the pub.
Situation with custom development of software is more often goes
this way: Someone gets to some
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 04:59:59PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
Sure, because they have not so much money, BUT they are trying to get
as much as possible for their money.
If persented with choice to get 15Gb drive for $110 + advanced filesystem
for
it for $11 (10
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 10:26 schrieben Sie:
Dieter Nützel wrote:
On Thursday, 13. December 2001 03:15 you wrote:
Hi all,
After I've run reiserfsck on my disk, I have a file with 0
permission:
# ls -l
0- 1 root root 238 Dec 11 22:52
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Could reiserfs developers take a look at this for me ?
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:03:50 -0600
From: Gary White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.17-rc1 boot problem
Here's the output from
FYI.
Nate, if the 3ware guys want to work with us, happy to do so.
Hans
Nate Amsden wrote:
hi hans.
im sure your a very busy guy so i will try to keep it brief. I have found
what appears to me to be a critical bug in the interaction between
3ware raid10 IDE arrays and reiserfs 3.5.32. I
Jens Benecke wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:16:59AM +1100, Soragan Kwok wrote:
which 2.4 kernel that work best with reiserfs without any problem ?
I am using 2.4.15pre1, new format, simple partitions and LVM volumes, about
300G in total, without any problems so far. My kernel packages can
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Shouldn't you try to force Marcelo to integrate all pending stuff
(O-inode-attrs.patch, quota)?
Thanks,
Dieter
Actually, Marcello takes our patches very very quickly without fail when
we send them in. (Alan was also good in this regard.) I have
confidence
_nasturtium wrote:
Go over to
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/Dec01/12-17pss.asp in
Konqueror, Lynx or your favorite web browser and you will find gasp
unprecedented range of no-charge services and support tools just in time
for holiday season. Now thats a nice touch (but
Jens Benecke wrote:
Just as file systems like NTFS never stabilize. NT 3.51's NTFS was infamous
for panicking in the middle of a swap operation and umounting all disks,
then crashing because it couldn't note this crash in the event log on one
of the umounted disks ;) NT4 still did this
Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
Raphael Bosshard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 02 Jan 2002 14:51:03 +0100:
What do you think about the filetype beeing just another
attribute? How difficult would it be to realize? Not so
difficult, in my oppinion, but I am most certainly wrong.
BeOS does do
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
echo requires good stereo to sound good filename/..comments
Then what about the following:
$ ls -aF
./ ../ somename somename_dir/
$ cp ~/file somename
when I meant
$ cp ~/file somename_dir/
but missed the typo? Does cp need someway to know that file
isn't
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Let us get a bit more specific. You should
echo text/plain /etc/passwd/..mime-type
Note the prepending with '..', as this allows distinguishing directory
meta-data from files by use of a style convention. Folks, if you don't
like .. as a prefix for meta-data,
Hubert Chan wrote:
The
.. just means something special to the OS,
It doesn't mean something special to the OS, you guys are missing my
intention, it is a style convention, not more.
Hans
Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
David L. Parsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 04 Jan 2002 19:23:11 -0500:
I'll agree that I initially thought the 'file as directory' idea had a
very high cool factor - but Linus, Al Viro, etc. convinced me otherwise.
This also makes me think you'll have a hard
Bram Stolk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:21:30 +0300
Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bram Stolk writes:
Hello,
I'm trying to delay the writes to disk.
Normally, this can be achieved by editting
/proc/sys/vm/bdflush
I believed reiserfs does not use bdflush nor
Chris Mason wrote:
On Monday, January 21, 2002 04:45:44 PM +0300 Hans Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that I requested that meta-data and data be given the same
delay (30 seconds)? What happened to my request?
Oleg, track and resolve this issue please.
metadata writes
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Vitaly,
I think Andrew could easily turn out to be right.
How about adding a clause to your $25 per hour?
If, in our opinion, the bug turns out to be the result
of a reiserfs problem, all changes will be waived.
Ed Tomlinson
On January 27, 2002 06:49 am, Vitaly
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Hi,
the reiserfsprogs link on the namesys download page seems to be wrong.
It points to:
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.x.1.tar.gz
where it should point to:
If I understand you right, your scheme has the fundamental flaw that one
dcache entry on a page can keep an entire page full of slackers in
memory, and since there is little correlation in usage between dcache
entries that happen to get stored on a page, the result is that the
effectiveness
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002 04:08:47 PM -0600 Matthew Hunter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent some time recently building a new system, and trying
to optimize the HD setup on that system. That means a 3-disk
RAID for most of the important data (RAID5 for important data,
Matt Simonsen wrote:
Just a wild guess, but perhaps you should look at LSOF to see if the process
is keeping a file open which has already been deleted.
I have seen many times a du not show this file, while df has a partition
being totally full. Kill the process that's keeping the file
Oliver Xymoron wrote:
Can we get you to agree that basically all subpage objects are immovable?
No. Certainly not in the general case, and I think Josh found ways to
handle the dcache case. If we can simply free the old objects, we don't
actually have to move the hot ones, as he points
Mike Hodson wrote:
Hello.
I am not a member of Namesys, nor a partner, nor even a business
affiliate. I just happen to use their ReiserFS filesystem on my computer.
This is how I recieved your unsolicited commercial message. Hundreds if
not Thousands of others have also recieved your message,
Nikita Danilov wrote:
Andreas Dilger writes:
On Feb 23, 2002 15:01 +0100, Marek 'Marecki' Szuba wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote:
There is an attribute patch for reiserfs which is compatible with the
ext2 attributes interface, and e2fsprogs 1.26+ has support for the
Bradley Kite wrote:
Hi there
I currently have too much time on my hands and am looking
into the possibilities (and feasibility) of implementing ReiserFS
on FreeBSD
Does any body know if someone is currently doing this? I dont want to
duplicate the effort involved, and would much rather join an
We'll try to reproduce your results We haven't run postmark recently I
think Elena can you try to reproduce?
Can you describe your hardware? Do you have tails on or off?
Hans
Ray Bryant wrote:
I've been working on a draft of a file systems performance paper
comparing ext2, ext3,
Ray Bryant wrote:
The list sofwtare apparently stripped this off because it was a binary
file (I had to gzip it to get it below the 40KB message size limit for
this list) Anyway, if you are interested in a copy of the benchmark,
please email me and I will send it along to you
Please send to
Anders Widman wrote:
On Saturday, March 02, 2002 06:55:24 PM +0300 Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 07:16:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I have some observation here that I cannot explain to myself.
It seems as though ReiserFS impaired my throughput on
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Mar 04, 2002 00:32 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Ok, I'm not going to be able to replicate the entire test, but I can
at least demonstrate the high number of subdirectories is slowing down
the creation time I'm guessing it is either caused by the
subdirectory inodes not
Ray Bryant wrote:
I can do that once the current benchmark run stops. In the meantime,
here is how it is being mounted:
mount -t reiserfs -o notail /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1
Is that not good enough?
Chris Mason wrote:
On Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:02:52 PM -0600 Ray Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RALF wrote:
we can offer ...
IBM DDYS 07N3255
9 GB 10K RPM 1 80 pin
price : US$ 69,00
1 year warranty
Min. order 100 units
NEW Factory sealed in IBM boxes
Ralf H Heiss
GM A-Tec Subsystems Inc
18261 Enterprise Lane
HB CA 92648 USA
www.atecsubsystems.com
P: 714 848 3599 x29
F: 714 848 9679
C:
Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Leo Comerford.
Content-Description: Forwarded message - failure notice
On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 07:41, Hans Reiser wrote:
The trouble with subfile metadata; an alternative suggested
Leo Comerford mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (Homepage)
http://www.st
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:43:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is somehow related to knfsd, I think. I will tell you what I will be able
to find.
The fact, that only ext3 does not show this problem made me also think
about, that the kernel locking code might
bo wrote:
Reiser teams,
I am sorry if any one of you received the VIRUS via my email address
today.
I have no idea how it spread by my email. I am the one that received
the same
VIRUS, too.
Could I get any data related with stability test(stress test, 48 hours
long test,
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:51:06PM -0800, bo wrote:
Could I get any data related with stability test(stress test, 48 hours long test,
...)
with ext2 and reiserfs?
There are way too many stress tests out threre. Also any particular load you
want to handle on your
Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 00:21, Joe Cooper wrote:
Don't
Well I don't, but when newbies who are used to computing on win32 systems
hear that they may not just accept the word don't. Actually its hard to find
the reasons exactly why one does not defrag.
;-)
ReiserFS
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Defragging is a missing feature. It will be the most important feature
of V4.1
4.1 seems pretty exciting, but why the need to defrag on these filesystems vs
others. Or do we not yet have the data? Guess I am intrigued on how these
work. Will defrag be included for
Bill Rees wrote:
Hi,
I've got a appication I'm testing that writes millions
of 15K files to an 800gb raidset (5x160 gb Maxtor
drives on a 3ware 7450 controller). The basic format
of the directory structure is as follows:
/partition/00/mmdd/hhmm/file1 (15k)
Bill Rees wrote:
Hi,
I've got a appication I'm testing that writes millions
of 15K files to an 800gb raidset (5x160 gb Maxtor
drives on a 3ware 7450 controller). The basic format
of the directory structure is as follows:
/partition/00/mmdd/hhmm/file1 (15k)
Thomas Wiedemann wrote:
hi reiserfs-developers,
i cannot mount my reiserfs partition any more, because of that:
super-459: read_super_block: super found at block 16 is within its own log. It must
not be of this format type.
so, here's the story how i created this error and some details:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:56:59 +0200, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Barring write cache effects, fsync() only returns after all blocks are
on disk. While I'm not sure if and if yes, which, Linux file systems are
affected, but for portable applications, be
Phil Howard wrote:
Continuing from an earlier discussion I had regarding the use of reiserfs
based files in place of databases, I was thinking about the issues involved
in serving DNS data directly from files. The concern I had previously was
the performance hit from open(),read(),close() to
Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I've seen HEAVY file corruption on unwanted reboots (like pressing the reset
button accidently) on reiserfs with this kernel on 3 machines now.
The symptom is that it finds a LOT of files to unlink on journal replay,
which I find suspicious as those machines are
glob is implemented by the shell not the filesystem. This is not for
good reason, it just is. We could write something for you to do it in
the filesystem and it would be faster. Is your need for speed critical
enough to justify writing something special for it?
Hans
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 10:59, Hans Reiser wrote:
So how about if you revise fsync so that it always sends data blocks to
the journal not to the main disk?
This gets a little sticky.
Once you log a block, it might be replayed after a crash. So, you have
to protect
Steve Pratt wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:42:48PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
Second, what is the option to keep fsck from prompting for 'Yes' when
running. I need to exec this without additional input. Seems like
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:59:46AM -0500, Steve Pratt wrote:
This is because non-standard journal support is only included in 2.5
kernel
series.
2.4 support is available as separate patch for now.
So just to be sure I understand this:the
Steve Pratt wrote:
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:11:37AM -0500, Steve Pratt wrote:
superblock. Neither 3.5 nor 3.6 superblock appear to have a label
field,
but mkfs has an option for it.
Labels are supported in reiserfs v3.6
pcg( Marc)@goof(A.).(Lehmann )com wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Kuba Ober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm thinking of is this:
to the user, which most users w/o intimate filesystem knowledge won't be able
to answer at all?
Unix traditionally wasn't aimed at the
It is a pity we don't have more folks like Rob working on Linux.
Hans
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/lexnames.html
Title:
data
Lexical File Names in Plan 9
or
Getting Dot-Dot Right
Rob Pike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, 07974
ABSTRACT
Symbolic links make
while our upstream Internet service provider installs new wireways.
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 22, 2002 18:33 +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
It is a pity we don't have more folks like Rob working on Linux.
I haven't read the whole paper, but at first glance it would appear
to be trivial to do this under Linux, because the dentries maintain
1 - 100 of 1054 matches
Mail list logo
