In the recent daily parade of BFG releases, 1.0a4 is out. It's a bugfix
release. Here is the change log:
1.0a4 (2009-06-25)
==
Features
- Cause ``:segment`` matches in route paths to put a Unicode-decoded
and URL-dequoted value in the matchdict for the value matche
On 6/25/09 7:10 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:39 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Iain Duncan wrote:
>>> I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want
>>> ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:39 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Iain Duncan wrote:
> > I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want
> > ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and
> > have it *just work*. I p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Iain Duncan wrote:
> I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want
> ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and
> have it *just work*. I plan on this project being a stupidly well
> document stand alone adm
Hello again, Cezary!
Cezary said:
> Just a quick question: what about repoze.who (using sql database) and
> users/groups/permissions? is it also, like you said,"optional"? from what
> I've seen in the docs for repoze.what quickstart, setup_sql_auth needs
> user, group and permission class as argum
I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want
ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and
have it *just work*. I plan on this project being a stupidly well
document stand alone admin interface scaffold for cases where explicit
is better than auto-generat
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 03:43 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 6/25/09 3:34 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> > First off, I am super impressed by the effort put into the bfg docs. The
> > ratio of docs to code is fantastic and IMHO bodes very well for
> > adoption. =)
> >
> > Second, I'm finding some small
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:32 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 6/25/09 5:35 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 04:09 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> >> Just a heads up.
> >>
> >> BFG currently uses Routes (http://routes.groovie.org) to do URL pattern
> >> matching.
> >>
> >> While fl
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:56 +0200, Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Iain Duncan :
> > For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a
> > negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as
> > one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary n
Thanks for your answer Gustavo!
Just a quick question: what about repoze.who (using sql database) and
users/groups/permissions? is it also, like you said,"optional"? from what
I've seen in the docs for repoze.what quickstart, setup_sql_auth needs user,
group and permission class as arguments. but a
On 6/25/09 9:08 AM, Jens W. Klein wrote:
> Am Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:54:23 -0400 schrieb Chris McDonough:
>
>> On 6/25/09 3:38 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>>> Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for
Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to
Hello.
(Cezary has just confirmed that he meant to say repoze.what. Sorry about the
confusion)
Cezary said:
> I'd like to extend basic user model available in repoze, and add additional
> class called "Gallery".
> this addition is needed because I'd like to create an app for photo
> galleries. I
On 6/25/09 5:35 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 04:09 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Just a heads up.
>>
>> BFG currently uses Routes (http://routes.groovie.org) to do URL pattern
>> matching.
>>
>> While fleshing out URL generation and matching support for BFG "url
>> dispatch",
Cezary said:
> ps. i'm using repoze with pylons
Hold on, you're talking about the Web authorization framework *repoze.what*,
not the Web application framework *repoze.bfg*, right?
Cheers. :)
--
Gustavo Narea .
| Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me: =Gustavo/about |
___
Am Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:54:23 -0400 schrieb Chris McDonough:
> On 6/25/09 3:38 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>> I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for
>>> Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to pin the version of all
>>> packages, but I don't
2009/6/25 Cezary Biele :
> Thanks for your reply!
> could you please point me to some documentation?
Try looking here:
http://docs.repoze.org/bfg/narr/security.html#assigning-acls-to-your-model-objects
\malthe
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@list
2009/6/25 Iain Duncan :
> For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a
> negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as
> one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary nature to
> pylons. And conversely, one of the turn offs for me
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 04:09 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Just a heads up.
>
> BFG currently uses Routes (http://routes.groovie.org) to do URL pattern
> matching.
>
> While fleshing out URL generation and matching support for BFG "url
> dispatch",
> I've come to the conclusion that it's prob
Thanks for your reply!
could you please point me to some documentation?
cezary
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Cezary Biele :
> > i'd be grateful for any suggestions how this should be achieved "the
> right
> > way" using repoze.
>
> The default supplied securit
2009/6/25 Cezary Biele :
> i'd be grateful for any suggestions how this should be achieved "the right
> way" using repoze.
The default supplied security policy consults the ``__acl__``
attribute; you could make this attribute dynamic (descriptor) and
grant permissions based on some "owner" attribu
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to extend basic user model available in repoze, and add additional
class called "Gallery".
this addition is needed because I'd like to create an app for photo
galleries. I'd like to have one user have access to many galleries and have
different roles in each of them (i.e user
On 6/25/09 3:38 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for
>> Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to pin the version of all
>> packages, but I don't think that's what Jens and I want in this case.
>
> yep, the only
On 6/25/09 3:34 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> First off, I am super impressed by the effort put into the bfg docs. The
> ratio of docs to code is fantastic and IMHO bodes very well for
> adoption. =)
>
> Second, I'm finding some small typos that could be confusing to total
> beginners. What's the routin
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for
> Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to pin the version of all
> packages, but I don't think that's what Jens and I want in this case.
yep, the only thing buildout is missing is a command to dump
First off, I am super impressed by the effort put into the bfg docs. The
ratio of docs to code is fantastic and IMHO bodes very well for
adoption. =)
Second, I'm finding some small typos that could be confusing to total
beginners. What's the routing for helping out here?
thanks
Iain
25 matches
Mail list logo
